DOCSLIB.ORG

Exhibit 96 Case 1:11-Cr-10286-DPW Document 131-3 Filed 06/15/12 Page 2 of 124

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Case 1:11-cr-10286-DPW Document 131-3 Filed 06/15/12 Page 1 of 124 Exhibit 96 Case 1:11-cr-10286-DPW Document 131-3 Filed 06/15/12 Page 2 of 124 HOW TO FIND MISSING-PERSONS A Handbook For Investigators Revised and Expanded Second Edition Ronald Eriksen_ Case 1:11-cr-10286-DPW Document 131-3 Filed 06/15/12 Page 3 of 124 ' ' -~06/11 ICMIPR0l 22:08:36 Page 1 .le a~d Character of Case: ORGANIZED CRIME DRUG INVESTIGATION Date Property Acquired: Source from which Property Acquired: 1012 3RD ST, APT 303 07/06/2011 SANTA MONICA CA Anticipated Disposition: Acquired By: Case Agent: KOCH KRISTIN D TEAHAN RICHARD E Description of Property: Date Entered lB 172 ITEM 25: BOOK "HOW TO FIND MISS.ING PERSONS", WESTERN UNION BUSINESS CARD (ROOM B, BOOKSHELF) Barcode ,. - · · · Location: ECRl 07/06/2011 • Case Number: Om.ing Office: LOS ANGELES ,......,,11.4,..._ Case 1:11-cr-10286-DPW Document 131-3 Filed 06/15/12 Page 4 of 124 Exhibit 97 Case 1:11-cr-10286-DPW Document 131-3 Filed 06/15/12 Page 5 of 124 Murders Charged in Third Superseding Indictment • United States v. Bulger etal, Criminal No. 99-10371-RGS 1. Michael Milano (March 8, 1973) 2. Al Plummer (March 19, 1973) 3. William O'Brien (March 24, 1973) 4. James O'Toole (December I, 1973) 5. Al Notorangeli (February 21, 1974) 6. James Sousa(October 1974) 7. Paul McGonagle (November 1974) 8. Edward Connors (June 12, 1975) 9. Thomas King (November 5, 1975) 10. Francis "Buddy" Leonard (November 6, 1975) 11. Richard Castucci (December 30, 1976) • 12. Roger Wheeler (May 27, 1981) 13. Debra Davis (Late 1981) 14. Brian Halloran (May 11, 1982) 15. Michael Donahue (May 11, 1982) 16. John Callahan (August I, 1982) 17. Arthur "Bucky" Barrett (July 1983) 18. John McIntyre (November 30, 1984) 19. Deborah Hussey (early 1985) • Case 1:11-cr-10286-DPW Document 131-3 Filed 06/15/12 Page 6 of 124 Exhibit 98 Case 1:11-cr-10286-DPW Document 131-3 Filed 06/15/12 Page 7 of 124 Page I 670 F.3d 48 • (Cite as: 670 F.3d 48) H Affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated in part, United States Court of Appeals, and remanded. First Circuit. John E. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra West Headnotes Davis; Robert P. Davis, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis; Marion Hussey, in her capacity as Ad· l!l Death 117 €;:;:,,17 ministratrix of the Estate of Deborah Hussey, Plain- tiffs, Appellees/Cross-Appellants, ill Death V. 1I 7Ill Actions for Causing Death UNITED STA TES of America, Defendant, Appel- l I 711l(A) Right of Action and Defenses lant/Cross-Appellee I l 7k 12 Grounds of Action John J. Connolly; John M. Morris; Lawrence Sarhatt; ll 7kl 7 k. Proximate cause of death. H. Paul Rico; Robert Fitz.patrick; James Ring; Rode­ Most Cited Cases rick Kennedy; James Greenleaf; James Abeam; James Bulger; Stephen Flemmi; John Does 1-50, Defen• dants. To establish liability under Massachusetts' Wrongful Death Act, in addition to wrongfulness, it must be shown that defendant's conduct was a but-for Nos. 10-1418, 10-1419, 10-1465, 10-1466, cause of plaintiffs injury, and that defendant's conduct l 0-2368, I0-2369, 11-2254, 11-2256. was a substantial legal factor in bringing about the Heard Oct. 6, 2011. alleged harm to the plaintiff M.G.L.A. c. 229, § 2 . Decided Jan. 20, 2012. Federal Courts 170B €:=>776 Background: Families and estates of two women ill • killed by organized crime gang members who were also Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) informants 170B Federal Courts brought action against the United States under the l 70BVIII Courts of Appeals Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) in connection with I 70BVIIl(K) Scope, Standards, and Extent the murders. The United States District Court for the I 70BVIII(K)I In General District of Massachusetts, William G. Young. J., en• I 70Bk776 k. Trial de novo. Most Cited tered judgment for the families and estates, 682 F,Supp.2d 60, and awarded sanctions against the United States, 739 ESupp.2d 64. The United States Federal Courts 170B €:=>871 appealed, and the families and estates cross-appealed, seeking an increase in damages. 170B Federal Courts 170BVIIJ Courts of Appeals Holdings: The Court of Appeals, Boudin, Circuit I70BVIIl(K) Scope, Standards, and Extent Judge, held that: I 70BVlll(K)5 Questions of Fact, Verdicts ill district court's finding that FBl's negligence was and Findings the "but for" causation of the women's deaths was not l 70Bk870 Particular Issues and Ques- clearly erroneous; tions l2) murders of the two women were foreseeable; 170Bk871 k. Damages and extent of Q) mother's claim for loss of consortium survived as a relief. Most Cited Cases claim for "other damage to the person"; and @) award of $350,000 for each murder victim's con­ Review of Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) scious pain and suffering was not so low as to bench trial awards is for clear error as to factual issues • represent an abuse of discretion. and de novo as to questions oflaw. 28 U .S.C.A. §§ © 2012 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. Case 1:11-cr-10286-DPW Document 131-3 Filed 06/15/12 Page 8 of 124 Page2 670 F.3d 48 (Cite as: 670 F.3d 48) 1346, 2671 et seq. (FBI) informants, that FBI's negligence, in connection • with its handling of the informants, was the "but for" ill Federal Courts 1708 €=875 causation of the deaths of the two women, was not clearly erroneous, in light of evidence that the FBI frustrated the capture and prosecution of the infor­ 170B Federal Courts mants. 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671 etseg. l 70BVIII Courts of Appeals 170BVl1J(K) Scope, Standards, and Extent 170BVlll(K)5 Questions of Fact, Verdicts Ifil Death 117 ,C::,,17 and Findings J 70Bk870 Particular Issues and Ques- ill Death tions I 17Ill Actions for Causing Death 170Bk875 k. Personal injuries and I l 7111(A) Right of Action and Defenses death. Most Cited Cases l l 7k 12 Grounds of Action l l 7k17 k. Proximate cause of death. United States 393 €:=>143 Most Cited Cases 393 United States United States 393 ,C::,,78(9) 3931X Actions 393kl43 k. Trial. Most Cited Cases 393 United States 393V Liabilities Under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), the 393k78 Torts existence and extent of a duty of care are questions of 19Jk78(5) Nature of Act or Claim law; whether any such duty has been breached and 393k78(9) k. Personal injuries in gen­ whether proximate cause exists are questions for the eral. Most Cited Cases factfinder, whose determination is binding on appeal unless clearly erroneous. 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671 In applying Massachusetts law to Federal Tort et seg. Claims Act (FTCA) action brought by the families and • estates of two women killed by organized crime gang ~ Death 117 €=t7 members who were also Federnl Bureau of Investiga­ tion (FBI) informants, the murders of the two women were foreseeable following the reckless in the extreme ill Death conduct of FBI agents in deliberately intervening to 117111 Actions for Causing Death prevent the informants from being caught and prose- · l!]IJJ(A) Right of Action and Defenses cuted; although there was no evidence that the FBI I 17k I 2 Grounds of Action agents focused on the two women or had special rea­ l 17kl7 k. Proximate cause of death. Most Cited Cases son to believe that the informants would act violently toward them, the agents knew they were protecting extraordinarily violent men who had already see­ United States 393 €:=>78(9) mingly murdered others. 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671 et seg. United States J93V Liabilities Ifil Dea th 117 <C;::;>ss 393k78_ Torts 393k78(5) Nature of Act or Claim Death 393k78(9) k. Personal injuries in gen­ ill l Actions for Causing Death eral. Most Cited Cases 171H ill!JJ.ill.l Damages or Compensation l 17k80 Elements of Compensation District court's finding, in Federal Tort Claims l I 7k88 k. Loss of society. Most Cited Act (FTCA) action brought by the families and estates Cases of two women killed by organized crime gang mem­ • bers who were also Federal Bureau of Investigation © 20!2 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. Case 1:11-cr-10286-DPW Document 131-3 Filed 06/15/12 Page 9 of 124 Page 3 670 F.3d 48 (Cite as: 670 F.3d 48) Under Massachusetts' law, mother's claim for loss awards in similar cases involving either asphyxiation • of consortium arising from the death of her daughter or murder. 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq. survived as a claim for "other damage to the person." M.G.L.A. c. 228. § l. 121 Federal Civil Procedure 170A ~768 11l Death 117 <C=>s2 170A Federal Civil Procedure 170AXX Sanctions ill Death 170AXX(B) Grounds for Imposition 117lll Actions for Causing Death 170Ak2767 Unwarranted, Groundless or I 17lll(H) Damages or Compensation Frivolous Papers or Claims I I 7k80 Elements of Compensation I 70Ak2768 k. In general. Most Cited I 17k82 k. Suffering of deceased. Most Cited Cases A court may sanction a completely baseless ar­ Death 117 €°=95(1) gument. ill Death *50 Thomas M. Bondy. Appellate Staff, Civil Divi­ I 17lll Actions for Causing Death sion, Department of Justice, with whom Tony West, I l 71Il(H) Damages or Compensation Assistant Attorney General, and Jonathan H.
Recommended publications
  • Lil^S^ OWNER©S NAME: Harbour Square Owners, Inc

    Lil^S^ OWNER©S NAME: Harbour Square Owners, Inc

    Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (Rev. 6-72) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE COUNTY: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY ENTRY DATE (Type all entries - complete applicable sections) C OMMON: Wheat Row AND/OR HISTORIC: STREET ANCJNUMBER: 1315, 1317, 1319, and 1321 Fourth Street, S.W. CITY OR TOWN: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: Congressman Washington Walter E STATE COUNTY: District of Columbia IT District of Columbia 001 CATEGORY ACCESSIBLE OWNERSHIP STATUS (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC D District (3 Building Public Public Acquisition: (X] Occupied Yes: jjj] Restricted CD Site Q Structure Private Q In Process [ I Unoccupie©d | | Unrestricted D Object Both | | Being Considered n Preservation work in progress a NO PRESEN T USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) I I Agricultural I | Government D Park Transportation Q Commercial Q Industrial [K] Private Residence Other (Sped #....*"V/> T> X^ I | Educational O Military | | Religious ft7%0\.. I | Entertainment II Museum | | Scientific liL^s^ OWNER©S NAME: Harbour Square Owners, Inc. STREET AND NUMBER: 500 N Street, S.W. CITY OR TOWN: Washington District : of Columbia COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: Recorder of Deeds STREET AND NUMBER: 6th and D Streets, N«W. CITY OR TOWN: Washington District of Columbia 11 TITLE OF SURVEY: Proposed Distr ict of Columbia Additions to the National Regis ter of Historic Places recommended by the Joint Committp.p. nn DATE OF SURVEY: Federal State | | County Local 7< DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: National Capital Planning Commission STREET AND NUMBER: 1325 G Strp.Pi- CITY OR TOWN: Washington District of Columbia JLL (Check One) llent Q Good Fair Deteriorated I I Ruins fl Unexposed CONDITION (Chock One) (Check One) Altered | | Unaltered Moved [3 Original Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (if known) PHYSICAL.
  • Social Life in the Early Republic: a Machine-Readable Transcription

    Social Life in the Early Republic: a Machine-Readable Transcription

    Library of Congress Social life in the early republic vii PREFACE peared to them, or recall the quaint figures of Mrs. Alexander Hamilton and Mrs. Madison in old age, or the younger faces of Cora Livingston, Adèle Cutts, Mrs. Gardiner G. Howland, and Madame de Potestad. To those who have aided her with personal recollections or valuable family papers and letters the author makes grateful acknowledgment, her thanks being especially due to Mrs. Samuel Phillips Lee, Mrs. Beverly Kennon, Mrs. M. E. Donelson Wilcox, Miss Virginia Mason, Mr. James Nourse and the Misses Nourse of the Highlands, to Mrs. Robert K. Stone, Miss Fanny Lee Jones, Mrs. Semple, Mrs. Julia F. Snow, Mr. J. Henley Smith, Mrs. Thompson H. Alexander, Miss Rosa Mordecai, Mrs. Harriot Stoddert Turner, Miss Caroline Miller, Mrs. T. Skipwith Coles, Dr. James Dudley Morgan, and Mr. Charles Washington Coleman. A. H. W. Philadelphia, October, 1902. ix CONTENTS Chapter Page I— A Social Evolution 13 II— A Predestined Capital 42 Social life in the early republic http://www.loc.gov/resource/lhbcb.29033 Library of Congress III— Homes and Hostelries 58 IV— County Families 78 V— Jeffersonian Simplicity 102 VI— A Queen of Hearts 131 VII— The Bladensburg Races 161 VII— Peace and Plenty 179 IX— Classics and Cotillions 208 X— A Ladies' Battle 236 XI— Through Several Administrations 267 XII— Mid-Century Gayeties 296 xi ILLUSTRATIONS Page Mrs. Richard Gittings, of Baltimore (Polly Sterett) Frontispiece From portrait by Charles Willson Peale, owned by her great-grandson, Mr. D. Sterett Gittings, of Baltimore. Mrs. Gittings eyes are dark brown, the hair dark brown, with lighter shades through it; the gown of delicate pink, the sleeves caught up with pearls, the sash of a gray shade.
  • The Fbi's Controversial Handling Of

    The Fbi's Controversial Handling Of

    THE FBI’S CONTROVERSIAL HANDLING OF ORGA- NIZED CRIME INVESTIGATIONS IN BOSTON: THE CASE OF JOSEPH SALVATI HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MAY 3, 2001 Serial No. 107–25 Printed for the use of the Committee on Government Reform ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/congress/house http://www.house.gov/reform U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 76–507 PDF WASHINGTON : 2001 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 10:05 Jan 22, 2002 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\76507.TXT HGOVREF1 PsN: HGOVREF1 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM DAN BURTON, Indiana, Chairman BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York HENRY A. WAXMAN, California CONSTANCE A. MORELLA, Maryland TOM LANTOS, California CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut MAJOR R. OWENS, New York ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania STEPHEN HORN, California PATSY T. MINK, Hawaii JOHN L. MICA, Florida CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York THOMAS M. DAVIS, Virginia ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, Washington, MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana DC JOE SCARBOROUGH, Florida ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland STEVEN C. LATOURETTE, Ohio DENNIS J. KUCINICH, Ohio BOB BARR, Georgia ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH, Illinois DAN MILLER, Florida DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois DOUG OSE, California JOHN F. TIERNEY, Massachusetts RON LEWIS, Kentucky JIM TURNER, Texas JO ANN DAVIS, Virginia THOMAS H.
  • UNITED STATES ) ) V. ) Civil Action No

    UNITED STATES ) ) V. ) Civil Action No

    Case 1:99-cr-10371-DJC Document 912 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS __________________________________________ ) ) UNITED STATES ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 99-10371-DJC ) JAMES J. BULGER ) ) ) __________________________________________) MEMORANDUM & ORDER CASPER, J. May 14, 2013 I. Introduction Defendant James J. Bulger (“Bulger”) has filed a series of motions seeking certain discovery from the government. The Court addresses the remaining three of these motions, D. 847, 878 and 883, in this Memorandum and Order. II. Relevant Factual Background and Procedural History Bulger has been charged in a 111-page, 48-count indictment charging him with participation in a racketeering conspiracy involving, among other things, murder, extortion and money laundering and separate charges of racketeering, money laundering, extortion and a range of firearms crimes. Trial in this matter is scheduled to begin on June 10, 2013. The government’s 21-day disclosures pursuant to Local Rule 116.2(b)(2) are due on or before May 20, 2013. The government, however, at the April 26, 2013 hearing (“April 26th hearing”) indicated that it had produced all Brady exculpatory evidence, 90% of Giglio information about its anticipated trial witnesses and 90% of the statements of these witnesses under the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, and confirmed its intent to produce the balance of same to counsel for Bulger 1 Case 1:99-cr-10371-DJC Document 912 Filed 05/14/13 Page 2 of 12 before the 21-day deadline. D. 901 at 68. Bulger has filed a series of discovery motions.
  • Greenleaf Family

    Greenleaf Family

    GENEALOGY OF THE Greenleaf Family COMPILED BY JAMES EDWARD GREENLEAF. " l}); Mctf) tl)e name atone de,scend,s ; •lour f)onor on iour,sdf depend5." -Gay. BOSTON: FRANK WOOD, PRINTER, 352 WASHINGTON STREET. 1896. COPYRIGHT BY JAMES E, GREENLEAF, 18g6. All rigkts reservtd. CONTENTS. PREFACE v. INTRODUCTION xi. NEWBURY, MASS. NOTES . 63, 49o PERSONAL HISTORY 71 MILITARY AND NAVAL SERVICE 161 GENEALOGY 190 UNCONNECTED F AMlLIES 47 2 NEWBURY RECORDS 493 IPSWICH RECORDS 494 HAVERHILL RECORDS 495 BOSTON RECORDS 495 GOVERNORS OF MASSACHUSETTS 501 ERRATA 502 ADDENDA 503 GENERAL INDEX 513 ILLUSTRATIONS. FRONTISPIECE OLD GARRISON HousE IN NEWBURY CAPT. STEPHEN GREENLEAF, JR. 8c PAINTED 1722. REV, DANIEL GREENLEAF • 82 FROM PORTRAIT BY COPLEY. HON. WILLIAM GREENLEAF 90 FROM PORTRAIT BY BLACKBURN. MARY (BROWN), WIFE OF HON. WILLIAM GREENLEAF FROM PORTRAIT DY BL.ACKBURN. JoHN GREENLEAF, SON OF HoN. WILLIAM GREE:l\'LEAF IO0 JAMES GREENLEAF, SON OF HoN. WILLIAM GREENLEAF IOI FROM PORTRAIT BY STUART. REBECCA, DAUGHTER OF HON. WILLIAM GREENLEAF, AND WIFE OF DR. NOAH \VEBSTER IOI SILHOlJRT'l'E, JEREMIAH GREENLEAF II4 PROFESSOR SIMON GREENLEAF 137 BENJAMIN GREENLEAF PREFACE. HE custom of prefacing books with introductory remarks, or explanations,-which the author desires to bring to the T notice of the reader,-is a pleasant way of saying, "Pause, before you pass the threshold 'of this house : it con­ tains many things which you should behold understandingly; and although the door stands wide open for you to enter therein, a cordial greeting awaits you, the guests are already assembled, and you are to take possession, I stand here to make the transfer, and we will, if you please, enter together.
  • Whitey Bulger and Prisoner Welfare - the Prindle Post a Requiem of Retribution at a Black Mass: Whitey Bulger and Prisoner Welfare

    Whitey Bulger and Prisoner Welfare - the Prindle Post a Requiem of Retribution at a Black Mass: Whitey Bulger and Prisoner Welfare

    8/9/2021 A Requiem of Retribution at a Black Mass: Whitey Bulger and Prisoner Welfare - The Prindle Post A Requiem of Retribution at a Black Mass: Whitey Bulger and Prisoner Welfare By Rachel Robison-Greene - Nov 30, 2018 "554T9816" by Cliff licensed under CC BY 2.0 (Via Flickr). On October 31, 2018, crime boss Whitey Bulger was found beaten to death in a West Virginia prison. Bulger was infamous for racketeering, committing murder, and evading capture for 16 years. His place on the FBI’s most wanted list was second only to Osama Bin Laden. He was finally captured in 2011 at the age of 81. He was convicted for his crimes and sentenced to two consecutive life sentences, but served only six years before more than one fellow inmate beat him to death with a padlock stuffed inside a sock. Bulger was infamous for his crimes and was reasonably well known among the population at large. He was the motivation for Jack Nicholson’s character in Martin Scorsese’s The Departed and his life story was told in the 2015 film Black Mass starring Johnny Depp as Bulger. There were good reasons to think that Bulger might be at a greater risk of victimization while incarcerated than other prisoners. He made many enemies during his career as a mafia boss, and many of those enemies either went to prison themselves or had connections in the prison system. To make matters worse, Bulger was an FBI informant for 15 years, and prisoners don’t tend to be particularly fond of “snitches.” With these considerations in mind, prison administrators might have done well to think carefully about Bulger’s safety in prison.
  • HSCA Volume V: 9/28/78

    HSCA Volume V: 9/28/78

    378 Obviously, the possibility cannot be dismissed, although it can hardly be said to have been established. At this point, it is, in your words, Mr. Chairman, perhaps only a little more than a "suspicion suspected," not a "fact found." The committee decided early in its investigation, as soon as it realized that a Mafia plot to assassinate the President warranted serious consideration, to assemble the most reliable information available on organized crime in the United States. The details of this phase of the committee's investigation will, of course, appear, hopefully in full, in its final report, a report that will consider the background of organized crime in America, the structure o£ the Mafia in the early 1960's, the effort by the Kennedy administration to suppress the mob, and the evidence that the assassination might have been undertaken in retaliation for those efforts. To scrutinize the possible role of organized crime in the assassi- nation, the committee early brought on one of the country's lead- ing experts on the subject. He is Ralph Salerno, whose career as an organized crime investigator with the New York City Police De- partment goes back to 1946. Mr. Salerno has since retired from the New York City Police Department and I would note that on the day of his retirement, the New York Times was moved to comment that he perhaps knew more about the Mafia than any nonmember in the United States. It would be appropriate at this time, Mr. Chairman, to call Ralph Salerno. Chairman STOKES . The committee calls Mr.
  • United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

    United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

    United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 03-1823 EMILY MCINTYRE, as Administrator of the Estate of John L. McIntyre; CHRISTOPHER MCINTYRE, as Co-administrator of the Estate of John L. McIntyre, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, Appellee, H. PAUL RICO; JOHN MORRIS; JOHN J. CONNOLLY; RODERICK KENNEDY; ROBERT FITZPATRICK; JAMES RING; JAMES GREENLEAF; JAMES AHEARN; KEVIN J. WEEKS; JAMES J. BULGER; STEPHEN FLEMMI; JOHN DOES, Nos. 1-50, Defendants. No. 03-1791 LAWRENCE A. WHEELER, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Roger M. Wheeler; PATRICIA J. WHEELER, Individually and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Roger M. Wheeler; PAMELA (WHEELER) NORBERG; DAVID B. WHEELER; MARK K. WHEELER, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, Appellee, JOHN J. CONNOLLY, JR.; JOHN M. MORRIS; H. PAUL RICO; ROBERT FITZPATRICK; JAMES A. RING; JAMES GREENLEAF; JAMES AHEARN; JAMES J. BULGER, a/k/a Whitey; STEPHEN J. FLEMMI, a/k/a The Rifleman; JOHN V. MARTORANO; JOHN DOES, Nos. 1-50, Defendants. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Reginald G. Lindsay, U.S. District Judge] Before Lynch, Circuit Judge, Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge, and Howard, Circuit Judge. William E. Christie, with whom Steven M. Gordon and Shaheen & Gordon, P.A. were on brief, for appellants Emily McIntyre and Christopher McIntyre. Richard A. Olderman, Attorney, Appellate Staff, with whom Robert S. Greenspan, Attorney, Appellate Staff, Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, and Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attorney, were on brief, for appellee United States in the McIntyre case.
  • United States District Court District of Massachusetts

    United States District Court District of Massachusetts

    Case 1:99-cr-10371-DJC Document 756 Filed 10/28/12 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 99-10371-RGS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES J. BULGER MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION FOR RECUSAL October 28 2012 STEARNS, D.J. Other than the identification of Jeremiah O’Sullivan as the member of the New England Organized Crime Strike Force who allegedly granted the defendant immunity for indictable criminal activity, defendant’s renewed motion raises no new issues of material fact or law, and will be DENIED for the same reasons as his earlier motion. Defendant has not connected any action of the Strike Force with regard to defendant to my tenure as a supervisory Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA), nor is there one. Nor is the court persuaded by defendant’s declaration that he might attempt to summons the undersigned judge as a witness. As the court has previously pointed out to counsel, a witness is only properly summoned to testify if he or she has something of relevance to say on a material issue. See Mem. and Order, at 8 (July 17, 2012) (“Because at no Case 1:99-cr-10371-DJC Document 756 Filed 10/28/12 Page 2 of 3 time during my service as an AUSA did I participate in or have any knowledge of any case or investigation in which defendant was a subject matter or target, I have nothing of a relevant or material nature to offer with regard to this case or any claim of immunity.”).
  • Whitey: United States of America V. James J

    Whitey: United States of America V. James J

    www.influencefilmclub.com Whitey: United States of America v. James J. Bulger Discussion Guide Director: Joe Berlinger Year: 2014 Time: 107 min You might know this director from: Hank: 5 Years from the Brink (2013) Under African Skies (2012) Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory (2011) Crude (2009) Metallica: Some Kind of Monster (2004) Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 (2000) Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hills (1996) Brother’s Keeper (1992) FILM SUMMARY James “Whitey” Bulger carved out a name for himself as a mastermind of the underworld, a ruthless murderer, gambler, drug dealer, and extortioner with a penchant for wrongdoing. Rising through the ranks of the Boston mob, contact with the FBI was inevitable. Rather than questioning his innocence as a devious criminal, WHITEY turns the camera on the American legal and justice system, unearthing corruption everywhere it points. The public’s decades long fascination with Bulger, both as a criminal and fugitive, was immense, something director Berlinger shared. As the FBI and Bulger prepared to come head to head in court in 2013, Berlinger met with the vast gang of characters connected to Bulger’s reign of crime: family members of murder victims, fellow mob members, the defence and prosecution, and journalists who have followed his career. A red thread emerges: no matter where one stands in the line of Bulger’s fire, no one considers him an innocent man. The question they all want answered: were FBI agents controlled by Bulger’s bribing reigns or was he a paid confidential informant? Coming in at 107 minutes, names and testimonies arrive at a fiery speed as one thing becomes crystal clear: the need to establish if Bulger was an informant or not.
  • Federalist Politics and William Marbury's Appointment As Justice of the Peace

    Federalist Politics and William Marbury's Appointment As Justice of the Peace

    Catholic University Law Review Volume 45 Issue 2 Winter 1996 Article 2 1996 Marbury's Travail: Federalist Politics and William Marbury's Appointment as Justice of the Peace. David F. Forte Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation David F. Forte, Marbury's Travail: Federalist Politics and William Marbury's Appointment as Justice of the Peace., 45 Cath. U. L. Rev. 349 (1996). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol45/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Law Review by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES MARBURY'S TRAVAIL: FEDERALIST POLITICS AND WILLIAM MARBURY'S APPOINTMENT AS JUSTICE OF THE PEACE* David F. Forte** * The author certifies that, to the best of his ability and belief, each citation to unpublished manuscript sources accurately reflects the information or proposition asserted in the text. ** Professor of Law, Cleveland State University. A.B., Harvard University; M.A., Manchester University; Ph.D., University of Toronto; J.D., Columbia University. After four years of research in research libraries throughout the northeast and middle Atlantic states, it is difficult for me to thank the dozens of people who personally took an interest in this work and gave so much of their expertise to its completion. I apologize for the inevita- ble omissions that follow. My thanks to those who reviewed the text and gave me the benefits of their comments and advice: the late George Haskins, Forrest McDonald, Victor Rosenblum, William van Alstyne, Richard Aynes, Ronald Rotunda, James O'Fallon, Deborah Klein, Patricia Mc- Coy, and Steven Gottlieb.
  • Why Investigative Journalism Matters

    Why Investigative Journalism Matters

    Credits © 2015 by The Boston Globe All rights reserved under the Pan-American and International Copyright Conventions. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system now known or hereafter in- vented, without written permission from the publisher. 1 Spotlight is launched On September 27, 1970, The Boston Globe announced in the newspaper the creation of a “special, three-man investigative team” that would provide deeper coverage on the stories driving the discus- sions of the day. The team was modeled after the “Insight” team that worked at the Sunday Times of London, which had gained recognition as a leading investigative newspaper authority. The Globe’s announcement got straight to the point for its readers. “The team’s mission will be to reconstruct major news events as rapidly and comprehensively as possible, with an emphasis on the ‘why’ rather than the ‘what’ of an event. The unit will also seek to expose public corruption and malfeasance. Articles by the team will appear under the signature of “Spotlight.” Almost a half-century later, that mission endures, as Spotlight remains the oldest, continuously op- erating investigative unit at a newspaper in the United States. With its aggressive coverage of the Catholic church, the healthcare industry, the shady world of taxicabs, and the unregulated college housing crisis, to name a few examples, the Spotlight team embodies investigative journalism at its best. Spotlight gives a voice to the voiceless, by shining a light into corners of our society that demand accountability.