Cross Correct Questions for Pedestrians and Wait for the Cars to Stop Has No Traffic Lights Has Zig-Zag Lines Equestrian Animals (Horses) Before Crossing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Cross correct questions For pedestrians and Wait for the cars to stop Has no traffic lights Has zig-zag lines equestrian animals (horses) before crossing Stands for Pedestrian User- Also known as equestrian Has WAIT on the signal For pedestrians and cyclists Friendly Intelligent Crossing crossings control Shows the green and Stands for pedestrian light- Uses sensors to control the Because ‘two can’ cross red man on the traffic controlled crossing traffic lights light pole Shows the green and You should wait for the Has flashing amber (yellow) Has traffic lights red man above the green man before crossing beacon lights button Vehicles should stop when Pedestrians need to press Vehicles must stop when Has white and black they see a pedestrian the button to control the the light is red lines on the crossing approaching the crossing lights 1 © The Scout Association. Registered charity numbers: 306101 (England and Wales) and SC038437 (Scotland) Zebra crossing 2 © The Scout Association. Registered charity numbers: 306101 (England and Wales) and SC038437 (Scotland) Pelican crossing 3 © The Scout Association. Registered charity numbers: 306101 (England and Wales) and SC038437 (Scotland) Puffin crossing 4 © The Scout Association. Registered charity numbers: 306101 (England and Wales) and SC038437 (Scotland) Toucan crossing 5 © The Scout Association. Registered charity numbers: 306101 (England and Wales) and SC038437 (Scotland) Pegasus crossing 6 © The Scout Association. Registered charity numbers: 306101 (England and Wales) and SC038437 (Scotland) Answers Question Answer Question Answer Has no traffic lights Zebra crossing Has zig-zag lines All For pedestrians and cyclists Toucan crossing Also known as equestrian crossings Pegasus crossing Puffin crossing Uses sensors to control the traffic Because ‘two can’ cross Toucan crossing Pegasus crossing lights Toucan crossing Has flashing amber (yellow) beacon Has traffic lights All except zebra crossings Zebra crossing lights Vehicles must stop when the light is Pedestrians need to press the button All except zebra crossings Pelican crossing red to control the lights For pedestrians and equestrian Wait for the cars to stop before Pegasus crossing All animals (horses) crossing Stands for Pedestrian User-Friendly Puffin crossing Has WAIT on the signal control Pelican crossing Intelligent Crossing Stands for pedestrian light-controlled Shows the green and red man on the Pelican crossing Pelican crossing crossing traffic light pole You should wait for the green man Shows the green and red man above All except zebra crossings Puffin crossing before crossing the button Vehicles should stop when the see a Has white and black lines on the Zebra crossing Zebra crossing pedestrian approaching the crossing crossing 7 © The Scout Association. Registered charity numbers: 306101 (England and Wales) and SC038437 (Scotland) .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

District of Epping Forest Local Highway Panel – 25 November 2010 Report by Area Highway Manager – Essex County Council
DISTRICT OF EPPING FOREST LOCAL HIGHWAY PANEL – 25 NOVEMBER 2010 REPORT BY AREA HIGHWAY MANAGER – ESSEX COUNTY COUNCIL Purpose of report To provide Members with a report on Highway issues within Epping Forest District. To provide sufficient information on schemes so that decisions on local priorities can be made. Members are invited to offer suggestions and requests for future works. Background A programme of Capital works for 2010/11 has been implemented. This report will provide details of the programme with the status of the schemes. Members are asked to consider the schemes District wide and suggest additional schemes that might be investigated for possible inclusion in a future programme of works. Maintenance Appendix A (page 9 and 10) details the proposed Capital Maintenance Programme. Members will be pleased to note that the majority of schemes are now complete. Traffic Improvements The capital traffic schemes set for the Epping Forest District are detailed within Appendix B (page 11 and 12) Safer Roads Improvement Programme Within the Epping Forest District, two locations have been identified for the 2010/11 programme: A414 Canes Lane, North Weald Bassett The design for this scheme is now complete and a start date on site is currently being agreed with the Contractor. Officer currently anticipate that this will be December, subject to the results of the safety audit. Common Road, Roydon This scheme is now complete. Officers are also currently carrying out a route study along A113, Abridge from Ongar to Passingford Bridge. A safety audit is currently underway on the proposed design. 1 Signage for speed limit review The review within the District on speed limits to ensure that they are within the guidelines set by the Department for Transport (DfT) circular 1/2006 and the new ECC Speed Management Strategy is on going.
[Show full text]
Sustrans Design Manual Chapter 7 Junctions and Crossings: Cycle Friendly Design (Draft)
Sustrans Design Manual • Chapter 7: Junctions and crossings: cycle friendly design (draft) Sustrans Design Manual Chapter 7 Junctions and crossings: cycle friendly design (draft) February 2015 February 2015 1 Sustrans Design Manual • Chapter 7: Junctions and crossings: cycle friendly design (draft) Contents This chapter of the Sustrans Design Manual should be read 7. Crossings in conjunction with Chapter 1 “Principles and processes for General Principles and Guidance 42 cycle friendly design.” That chapter includes key guidance Cycle priority crossings 46 on core design principles, whether to integrate with or segregate from motor traffic, the space required by cyclists Uncontrolled crossings 48 and other road users as well as geometrical considerations. Types of controlled crossing 52 Readers are also directed towards the “Handbook for Signalised crossings 54 cycle-friendly design” which contains a concise illustrated Grade separated crossings 58 compendium of the technical guidance contained in the Design Manual. This chapter has initially been issued as a draft and it is intended that it be reviewed during 2015; 8. Interface with carriageway feedback on the content is invited and should be made by Overview 59 31 May 2015 to [email protected] Low angle merge and diverge facilities 60 1. Key Principles 3 Perpendicular (or high angle) transitions 62 2. Introduction 4 Culs-de-sac and road closures 65 3. General Principles and Guidance 4 Flush Kerbs 65 4. Priority Junctions 9. References 67 Overview 8 Raised table junctions 10 Modifying existing junction geometry 12 About Sustrans 5. Signalised junctions Sustrans makes smarter travel choices possible, General considerations 14 desirable and inevitable.
[Show full text]
Advice on Road Crossings for Equestrians in England and Wales
Advice on The British Road Crossings for Equestrians Horse in England and Wales Society The law and management of public access rights vary widely between the four countries of the United Kingdom. This advice note is written for England and Wales and although elements of the advice may be applicable in Scotland and Northern Ireland this cannot be assumed. If this is a saved or printed copy, please check www.bhs.org.uk/accessadvice for the latest version (date top of page 2). In providing specifications for ways and facilities for equestrians, the British Horse Society considers all equestrian users (those riding, leading or driving horses). This may result in a high specification which might not be appropriate in all circumstances. The recommendations should be read with this in mind. If the specification seems inappropriate in a situation, the Society strongly advises consultation with its local representative to establish what may be acceptable at a particular site. Sites vary so much that BHS specifications can only be general in nature and may require tailoring for any site. Routes used by equestrians include bridleways, byways, unsurfaced unclassified roads, quiet lanes, permissive paths, commons and public open space; most of which leave riders and carriage-drivers no choice but to use busy roads to reach them. Generally, crossing a main road is much preferred by equestrians as far safer than proceeding for any distance along it. An underpass or overpass are the ideal for crossing a busy road but commonly cannot be provided on the grounds of cost or available space and an at grade crossing is the only option.
[Show full text]
Committee Management Information System
EXECUTIVE DATE: 20 OCTOBER 2003 SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT OF FORMAL PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS REPORT BY: HEAD OF ENGINEERING & TRANSPORTATION CONTACT OFFICER: PETER TILBURY 01582 547161 IMPLICATIONS: LEGAL STAFFING EQUALITIES COMMUNITY SAFETY FINANCIAL RISKS OTHER CONSULTATIONS: COUNCILLORS CONSULTED SCRUTINY COMMITTEE CONSULTED STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTED OTHER WARDS AFFECTED: ALL LEAD EXECUTIVE MEMBER(S): COUNCILLOR R. DAVIES RECOMMENDATION(S) 1. Executive is recommended to agree the proposed assessment criteria for the provision of formal pedestrian crossing facilities. REPORT 2. The purpose of this report is to inform the Executive of proposed assessment criteria for the provision of formal pedestrian crossing facilities. 3. In April 1995, the then Department of Transport (now the Department for Transport - DfT) issued Local Transport Notes 1/95 and 2/95 giving guidance on the assessment and design of pedestrian crossings. These guidance notes altered the previous government advice significantly, with a more thorough yet flexible approach being advocated. The guidance is solely aimed at zebra and pelican/puffin crossings and does not apply to pedestrian crossing facilities at traffic signal-controlled junctions. Based on this guidance a new criterion for the assessment of pedestrian crossings in Luton is being proposed. While the assessment is clearly somewhat involved, Members are asked to acknowledge that a wide range of factors are now taken into consideration in determining whether a pedestrian crossing is provided and can be used to rank the provision of pedestrian crossings in terms of priority. Page 1 of 13 BACKGROUND 4. The old (pre-1995) Department of Transport guidance suggested that formal pedestrian crossing facilities should be assessed on the basis of the PV² value (the factor of the square of the vehicle flow [V] at the location and the volume of pedestrians crossing [P]).
[Show full text]
A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road Appendices
Appendices A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road Monitoring and Evaluation Baseline Report Appendix A. Scheme Description Atkins A6MARR Baseline Report | Version 2.6 | April 2016 | 5124908 48 ` A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road Application for Full Approval Annex 1 Scheme Description October 2014 5124908/A6MARR_MSBC_Annex_1_Scheme_Description.docx A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road Application for Full Approval Annex 1 Scheme Approval October 2014 Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council’s information and use in relation to the A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road scheme proposal. Atkins Limited assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. Document History JOB NUMBER: 5214908 DOCUMENT REF: A6MARR_MSBC_Annex_1_Scheme_Description.docx 1 Draft GR 16/10/14 Rev Purpose Description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date 5124908/A6MARR_MSBC_Annex_1_Scheme_Description.docx A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road Application for Full Approval Annex 1 – Scheme Description Contents Section Page 1. Introduction 4 Purpose of this Document 4 2. Scheme Description 4 About the Scheme 4 Key Elements of the A6MARR Scheme 6 The Proposed A6MARR Scheme 7 Appendices Appendix A - A6MARR Highway Alignment/ Block Plans 5124908/A6MARR_MSBC_Annex_1_Scheme_Description.docx 3 A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road Application for Full Approval Annex 1 – Scheme Description 1. Introduction Purpose of this Document 1.1 This document is an Annex to the Application for Full Approval, and provides a description of the A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road (A6MARR) scheme, identifying the location and individual components of the scheme.
[Show full text]
Part D – Section 12
Streetscape Guidance Part D – Physical design and materials 12. Crossings ............................................................................................ 276 12.1. Vision ............................................................................................................... 276 12.2. Tactile paving ................................................................................................... 276 12.3. Controlled crossings ........................................................................................ 289 12.4. Design objectives ............................................................................................. 292 12.5. Uncontrolled crossings .................................................................................... 303 12.6. Traffic signals and control boxes ..................................................................... 315 12.7. Grade-separated pedestrian crossings ............................................................ 319 12.8. Subways .......................................................................................................... 322 12.9. Footbridges ...................................................................................................... 326 12.10. Road bridges ................................................................................................... 327 12.11. Road underpasses ........................................................................................... 329 Crossings 275 Streetscape Guidance Part D – Physical design
[Show full text]
Ch4 Junctions and Crossings
London Cycling Design Standards consultation draft – June 2014 127 Chapter 4 – Junctions and crossings Chapter 4 Junctions and crossings 4.1 Junction design issues 128 Junction design considerations 131 Junction geometry and corner radii 132 4.2 Crossings 135 Selecting the crossing type 136 Crossings at signal-controlled junctions 137 Stand-alone signal-controlled crossing 139 Parallel priority crossings 140 Priority (zebra) crossing 141 Uncontrolled crossings 143 Pedestrian crossing of cycle tracks 144 4.3 Priority junctions 146 Refuge islands 147 Entry treatments, raised tables and footway build-outs 150 Road markings through junctions 154 4.4 Signal-controlled junctions 156 Procedures for traffic signals 158 Separate signalling for cyclists 159 Managing conflict with left-turning traffic 162 Support for cyclists making right turns 165 Banning selected vehicle movements 167 Lanes marked through junctions 168 Advanced Stop Lines 169 Bus lanes at signal controlled junctions 176 4.5 Roundabouts and gyratories 177 Normal and signalised roundabouts 178 Mini-Roundabouts 180 Compact and continental roundabouts 180 Roundabouts with annular cycle lanes 182 'Dutch style' roundabouts with segregated cycle lanes 183 Informal roundabouts 184 Gyratories and one-way systems 185 London Cycling Design Standards consultation draft – June 2014 128 Chapter 4 – Junctions and crossings 4.1 Junction design issues 4.1.1 This chapter provides design guidance on the use and adaptation of junctions and crossings to form safer, coherent and comfortable cycling provision, while maintaining optimum accessibility for pedestrians. It is organised according to four categories: crossings, priority junctions (where vehicles on one route have priority over an intersecting route), signal controlled junctions, and roundabouts (including gyratories).
[Show full text]
01491 825038 E-Mail: [email protected]
BENSON PARISH COUNCIL Benson Parish Hall, Sunnyside, Benson, Wallingford, OX10 6LZ Tel: 01491 825038 E-mail: [email protected] Minutes of the Full Council meeting of Benson Parish Council held on Thursday 25th July 2019 at 7:30pm in the Parish Hall Committee Room Present: Cllr B Pattison (Chairman) Cllr P Baylis Cllr R Jordan Cllr T McTeague Cllr P Murray Cllr J Sharman Cllr I Skeels Cllr T Stevenson Cllr M Winton Proper Officer: E Stanley (Parish Clerk) In attendance: SODC Cllr A Powell Reporter from the Henley Standard 17 Members of the Public Item 12 on the agenda was brought forward (see item 12) 1. Apologies Apologies were received from Cllrs F Lovesey, S McCann and D Olley, and District Cllr S Cooper 2. Declarations of interest Cllrs J Sharman and T Stevenson declared interests in item 15.c.i. 3. To receive reports from the following: a. Cllr M Gray – OCC Member Cllr Gray was not present. b. Cllr S Cooper – SODC Member Cllr Cooper was not present c. Cllr A Powell – SODC Member Cllr A Powel presented her written report (see attached) Cllr B Pattison expressed the importance of cycleways needing to be maintained and kept clear of overgrowth. Cllr P Murray asked if SODC is consulting with Oxford City Council and Cllr A Powell confirmed that Oxford City Council is in the Oxfordshire Partnership and part of consultations. Cllr J Sharman asked if SODC has plans to scrap or review the non-disclosure agreement that was signed by the previous term’s Council with relation to the Oxford-Cambridge Expressway.
[Show full text]
The Best Things in Museums Are the Windows Archive Organized by Project Title
Portland State University PDXScholar The Best Things in Museums are the Windows Archive Organized by Project Title 7-18-2013 The Best Things in Museums are the Windows Harrell Fletcher Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/museum_windows Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Fletcher, Harrell, "The Best Things in Museums are the Windows" (2013). The Best Things in Museums are the Windows. 1. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/museum_windows/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Best Things in Museums are the Windows by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. THE BEST THINGS IN MUSEUMS ARE ■mm. Walking, Participation & the Expanded Classroom f THE BEST THINGS IN MUSEUMS ARE THE WINDOWS Walking, Participation & the Expanded Classroom HARRELL FLETCHER • THE EXPLORATORIUM y CONTENTS Let’s Take a Walk Marina McDougall 4 The Best Things in Muséums Are the Windows Harrell Fletcher 8 Everyone Is You and Me Jordan Stein 10 Seven Windows Shannon Jackson 18 Walking Harrell Fletcher 26 A Walking Acrostic jason Groves 28 A View from the Edge: The Peripatetic Perspective Jason Groves 34 Collaboration Harrell Fletcher 40 Where We Went and What We Did 42 (pages 4-8) As a pedestrian one encounters,oddities and marvels such as these found along The Windows' four-day trek. Let’s Take a Walk In the summer of 2013, the Exploratorium hosted Harrell Fletcher’s The Best Things in Museums Are the Marina McDougall Windows, an ambitious four-day trek to the top of Mount Diablo from the eastern end of our site at Pier 15 on San Francisco’s downtown waterfront.
[Show full text]
Leicester Street Design Guide First Edition June 2020 Leicester - Street Design Guide
Leicester Street Design Guide First Edition June 2020 Leicester - Street Design Guide FOREWORD The Leicester Street Design Guide draws on best practice from within our city, from across the UK This First Edition of the Leicester Street Design and internationally. Whilst our city is unique, Guide is published during the unprecedented the challenges we face are not. Adopting the Covid-19 crisis, giving it a new relevance we could Healthy Streets Assessment method will help us have never imagined when we first embarked on to identify priorities, consider design options and this major project many months ago. achieve accessible and consistent street design that recognises the needs of all our residents. We Back then climate change, economic uncertainty encourage other local authorities to apply this and matters of public health and wellbeing acted as guide, to their unique place, where applicable. a stimulus, but now we have a climate emergency to respond to and all the health, economic and This document is the result of work and input from wider social uncertainty that the present pandemic very many experts and stakeholders. Particular brings. thanks must be given to Brian Deegan of Urban Movement as the City Mayor’s Healthy Streets A decade ago, we began the Connecting Leicester Advisor, Phil Jones Associates who gave specific programme. Since then new public squares, support for the Planning & Design Element improved cycling and walking infrastructure Sheets, Officers of Leicester City Council and and even wider pedestrianisation of our city has those many representatives of disability groups, transformed the city’s landscape: promoting transport campaign organisations and others, who sustainable, active travel and a healthy economy.
[Show full text]
Report Report
2020/05/06 21:05 1/68 Report Report Smart pedestrian crossing Author(s): Bárbara Cruz Caruso David van Duivenboden Jens Hoernschemeyer Solenne Peytard Jan Starosta Charlie Stenskie Acknowledgement Glossary Abbreviation Description EPS European Project Semester ISEP Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto USB Universal Serial Bus NCHS The National Center for Health Statistics National Highway Traffic Safety NHTSA Administration LF Low Frequency HF High Frequency UHF Ultra High Frequency NFC Near-Field Communication RFID Radio-Frequency Identification USB Universal Serial Bus HID Human Interface Device SPI Serial Peripheral Interface EPS@ISEP - http://www.eps2020-wiki6.dee.isep.ipp.pt/ Last update: 2020/05/06 15:35 report http://www.eps2020-wiki6.dee.isep.ipp.pt/doku.php?id=report Abbreviation Description ISP Internet Service Provider CAN Controller Area Network ADC Analog to Digital Converter DAC Digital to Analog Converter HD High-Definition HDMI High-Definition Multimedia Interface X10CrNi18-8 Stainless Steel PE-HD Polyethylene High-Density ABS Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene POM-C Polyoxymethylene ECEC European Council of Engineers Chambers 1 Introduction In this chapter our project will be introduced to you. You will discover our team, the goals of this project and why we decided to work on this subject. Then, you will have an overview of the organization of the project and of the structure of the report. 1.1 Presentation Team 6, better known as Team Schnabeltier (German for platypus), consists of six team members from different countries
[Show full text]
Pedestrian Crossings
Appendix 10 Pedestrian Crossings The design of controlled pedestrian crossing facilities (Puffin, Toucan, Pegasus and Zebra) will be in accordance with all relevant current standards and will take into account all current design guidance. Any departure from current design standards and any significant departure from current design guidance must be approved by the Service Director, Infrastructure Management & Operations. Choosing which crossing is most appropriate and indeed where it should go is a sometimes difficult job as there are many competing demands and criteria related to safety and amenity that must be fulfilled in order for the crossing to be well used and beneficial to the travelling public. A PUFFIN CROSSING is a signal controlled pedestrian crossing where the lights controlling the pedestrians are on the near side of the road. The system also utilises sensors which detect the presence of pedestrians waiting at the crossing and as they are crossing the road. If after pushing the button the pedestrian decides to cross before the 'green man' appears, the sensor detects this movement and can automatically cancel the requested 'demand' if there is no one else waiting to cross. A TOUCAN CROSSING is a signal controlled pedestrian crossing that also allows bicycles to be ridden across. A PEGASUS CROSSING is a signalised pedestrian crossing with special consideration for horse riders. At a minimum, these crossings are in the form of a pelican crossing but simply have two control panels, one at the normal height for pedestrians or dismounted riders, and another one two metres above the ground for the use of mounted riders.
[Show full text]