Active Travel Guidance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Active Travel Guidance Welsh Government Active Travel Guidance February 2020 Image courtesy of Chandra Prasad / Sustrans Contents PART 1 - Delivery Chapter 1: Part 1 Introduction 11 Chapter 2: Policy and Legislative Context 17 2.1 Introduction 17 2.2 Well-being of Future Generations Act 17 2.3 Environment (Wales) Act 2016 19 2.4 Programme for Government 19 2.5 Planning Policy Wales 20 2.6 Equalities 21 2.7 WelTAG 23 2.8 Sustainable Drainage 24 Chapter 3: The Duties on Local Authorities 25 3.1 The Duties under the Active Travel Act 25 3.2 Timescale for the Submission of the Active Travel Network Map 26 3.3 Where the Duties Apply 26 Chapter 4: Definitions 28 4.1 Definition of Active Travel and Active Travel Routes 28 4.2 Terminology 28 4.3 Definition of Active Traveller - walkers, cyclists and other highway users 28 Chapter 5: Planning the Network 31 5.1 Who the network is for? 31 5.2 Designated Localities 32 5.3 Crossing Administrative Boundaries 32 5.4 Rurality 32 5.5 Mapping the network 33 5.6 Prioritisation and Network Coverage 35 5.7 Preparing the Map 36 © Crown copyright 2020 WG40120 Mae’r ddogfen yma hefyd ar gael yn Gymraeg / This document is also available in Welsh 2 Consultation Draft 2020 5.8 Planning Status 37 5.9 Routes that are not owned by a local authority 37 5.10 Training and Support 38 5.11 Approving the Map 38 5.12 Publishing the Map 38 5.13 Reviewing the Map 39 5.14 Partial Review of the Map 41 5.15 Continuous improvement 42 5.16 Funding the Network 42 Chapter 6: Consultation and Engagement 44 6.1 Preparation of the Map 44 Chapter 7: Promoting Active Travel 47 Chapter 8: Monitoring and Reporting 48 8.1 Reporting Duties 48 8.2 Review of the Act 48 Chapter 9: Provision for Walkers and Cyclists when Changes are Made to the Highway 49 9.1 Duties under the Act 49 9.2 Creation and Maintenance of the Highway 49 9.3 Interference with Highways 50 9.4 Acquisition of Land for Highway Purposes 50 9.5 Traffic Regulation and Traffic Regulation in Special Cases 51 9.6 Parking 51 9.7 Obstructions 51 9.8 Street Works 52 9.9 Traffic Management 52 3 Consultation Draft 2020 PART 2 - Planning and Design Chapter 10: Part 2 Introduction 55 10.1 Activ e Travel Wales 63 10.2 Highway Desin and the Active Travel Act 64 10.3 Status of the Guidance 68 10.4 Trunk Roads 68 10.5 Local Roads 68 10.6 New Develoment 69 10.7 Innovation and Experimentation 69 10.8 Design Elements 69 10.9 Keeping Standards Up to Date 70 Chapter 11: Stakeholder Participation, Engagement and Consultation 63 11.1 Introduction 63 11.2 Principles of Good Practice 63 11.3 Tools for Participation and Consultation 66 11.4 Action Travel Network Map Consultation 68 11.5 Scheme Delivery and Sultation 70 Chapter 12: User Needs 72 12.1 Similarities and Differences 72 12.2 Design Principles 73 12.3 Inclusive Design 73 12.4 Pedestrians’ Needs 76 12.5 Widths for Pedestrian Routes 81 12.6 Gradients for Pedestrian Routes 83 12.7 Surface Material for Pedestrian Routes 83 12.8 Reference for Pedestrian User Needs 84 12.9 Cyclists’ Needs 84 12.10 Why do People Cycle? 85 12.11 Minimising the Effort Required to Cycle 86 12.12 Dimensions of Cycles commonly in use 89 12.13 Headroom for Cycle Routes 92 4 Consultation Draft 2020 12.14 Typical Cycling Speeds 92 12.15 Visibility Dimensions for Cycle Routes 93 12.16 Gradients on Cycle Routes 94 12.17 Space required for Cycling 95 12.18 Widths for Cycle Tracks 96 12.19 Widths for Cycle Lanes 97 12.20 Additional Width Adjacent to Vertical Features 98 12.21 Width Considerations for On-Carriageway Cycling 99 12.22 General Lane Widths on Carriageways 99 12.23 Width at Pinch Points 100 12.24 Surfaces for Cycle Routes 101 Chapter 13: Network Planning 104 13.1 Introduction 104 13.2 Showing the Existing Routes on the Active Travel Network Map 107 13.3 Showing Proposed Routes on the Active Travel Network Map 107 13.4 Integration with Policies, Plans, Programmes and Infrastructure 108 13.5 Network Planning for Walking 110 13.6 Network Planning for Cycling 117 13.7 Validation of Active Travel Network Maps 128 13.8 Prepare and Submit Active Travel Network Map 129 13.9 Prioritising and Delivering the Active Travel Schemes 129 Chapter 14: Design for Walking & Cycling 133 14.1 Introduction 133 14.2 Co-Production of design 134 14.3 General design considerations 135 14.4 Basic Network 137 14.5 General Design Approachs 138 14.6 Reducing the Speed and Volume of Motor Vehicles 139 14.7 Filtered Permeability 139 14.8 Reallocation of road space 140 14.9 Vehicle Restricted Areas 141 14.10 Pedestrian prioritised and informal streets 143 14.11 Link Design Considerations 144 5 Consultation Draft 2020 14.12 Segregration between Cyclists and Pedestrians DE023, DE024, DE032 and DE033 146 14.13 Type of segregation 148 14.14 Monitoring and Management 150 14.15 Pedestrians on Links - DE001, DE002, DE003 and DE004 152 14.16 Gradients, Ramps and Steps 154 14.17 Cycling on Links - Introduction 152 14.18 Traffic Lane Widths and Car Parking 154 14.19 Cycling in All-Purpose Traffic Lanes 156 14.20 Reducing Traffic Volumes and Speeds DE005, DE006, DR007 156 14.21 Contraflow Cycling DE009 and DE010 157 14.22 Traffic Calming DE005, DE006 and DE007 157 14.23 Quiet Streets DE011 159 14.24 Cycle Streets DE012 159 14.25 Cycle Lanes DE009, DE013, DE014, DE015, DE016 and DE017 160 14.26 Car parking / loading and Cycle Lanes DE015 161 14.27 Cycle Lanes at Side Roads DE016 161 14.28 Removal of centre lines DE017 161 14.29 Cycle lanes with light segregation DE018, DE019, DE020 162 14.30 Stepped Cycle Tracks DE021 and DE022 163 14.31 Cycle Tracks Alongside the Carriageway DE023 and DE024 164 14.32 Cycle track crossing of side roads DE025 DE026 165 14.33 Side Road Entry Treatments and Blended Junctions DE039 and DE040 167 14.34 Cycle tracks in centre of carriageway DE027 168 14.35 Cycle Lanes/Tracks at Bus Stops DE028 DE029 DE030 DE031 170 14.36 Cycle Tracks away from Roads DE032 and DE033 172 14.37 Design and Construction of Routes away from the Highway 173 14.38 Cycling on Rural Roads 175 14.39 Transitions between Cycle Tracks and the Carriageway DE034 177 14.40 Cyclists and public transport routes 179 14.41 Bus lanes and bus-only streets DE035 180 14.42 Cycling and Trams 180 14.43 Crossing and Junction Design - General Principles 181 14.44 Considerations for Pedestrian and Cycle Crossings 183 14.45 Crossing Types 185 6 Consultation Draft 2020 14.46 Uncontrolled Crossings DE036 DE037, DE038, DE039 and DE040 186 14.47 Central median strips DE041 187 14.48 Zebra crossings DE042 188 14.49 Signalised crossings away from junctions DE044 and DE045 188 14.50 Crossings at signal-controlled junctions 189 14.51 Cycle priority crossings DE037 190 14.52 Simple uncontrolled crossings DE036 191 14.53 Uncontrolled crossing with refuge DE038 191 14.54 Parallel Crossing for Pedestrians and Cyclists DE043 191 14.55 Signalised Cycle and Pedestrian Crossings (Toucan) DE045 192 14.56 Pedestrian and Cycle Bridges DE046 193 14.57 Subways and Underbridges DE047 193 14.58 Wheeling Ramps DE048 195 14.59 Cyclists at Priority Junctions 195 14.60 Unmarked Informal Junctions DE048 196 14.61 Signalised Junctions for Cyclists - General Considerations 197 14.62 Advanced stop lines (ASLs) DE050 198 14.63 Cycle signal stages 200 14.64 Exemption from banned turns 202 14.65 Intergreen Times 202 14.66 Permanent green cycle signal on bus gate 202 14.67 Diagonal cycle crossing stage during all red 202 14.68 Cycle bypass at traffic signals DE051 203 14.69 Uncontrolled cycle crossing at signalled junction 205 14.70 Guiding cyclists through signalised junctions DE052 205 14.71 Two stage right turn at traffic signals DE053 206 14.72 Hold the Left Turn DE054 207 14.73 Simultaneous green signals DE055 208 14.74 Trixi Mirrors (Blind spot mirrors) 208 14.75 Cycle provision at signalised roundabouts 209 14.76 Cycle Provision at Unsignalised Roundabouts 209 14.77 Mini Roundabout DE056 210 14.78 Compact (or “Continental”) roundabouts DE055 211 14.79 Conventional Unsignalised Roundabouts 212 14.80 Dutch Style Roundabout DE058 213 14.81 Informal roundabouts at unmarked junctions 214 7 Consultation Draft 2020 Chapter 15: Integration with Public Transport 217 15.1 Introduction 217 15.2 Improving Walking Access to Public Transport 217 15.3 Improving Cycling Access to Public Transport 218 15.4 Carriage of Cycles on Public Transport 218 15.5 Cycle hubs and Services at interchanges 221 15.6 Park and Cycle 223 Chapter 16: Street Furniture and Cycle Parking 225 16.1 Introduction 225 16.2 Seating 226 16.3 Public toilets 227 16.4 Signs for Pedestrians 228 16.5 Planting and Hard Landscaping 231 16.6 Litter Bins 233 16.7 Cycle Count Displays 234 16.8 Cycle Parking 234 16.9 Signs for Cyclists 243 Chapter 17: Related Facilities 250 17.1 Introduction 250 17.2 General Processes for Highway Works 250 17.3 Highways Created by Welsh Government and Highway Authorities 253 17.4 Highways Created by Private Sector Developments 253 17.5 Highway Improvement Schemes 256 17.6 Highway Maintenance Schemes 257 17.7 Managing Highways 258 Chapter 18: Construction, Maintenance and Management 262 18.1 Introduction 262 18.2 On-carriageway cycle routes 262 18.3 Coloured surfacing 263 18.4 Footway construction 263 18.5 Footpath construction 263 18.6 Cycle Track Construction 264 8 Consultation Draft 2020 18.7 Tactile paving 266 18.8 Kerbs, edgings and verges 267 18.9 Drainage 239 18.10 On-Carriageway Drainage 269 18.11 Off-Carriageway Drainage 270 18.12 Access Controls 272 18.13 Fencing and Hedgerows 273 18.14 Lighting 274 18.15 Maintenance - Introduction 275 18.16 Design with maintenance in mind
Recommended publications
  • District of Epping Forest Local Highway Panel – 25 November 2010 Report by Area Highway Manager – Essex County Council
    DISTRICT OF EPPING FOREST LOCAL HIGHWAY PANEL – 25 NOVEMBER 2010 REPORT BY AREA HIGHWAY MANAGER – ESSEX COUNTY COUNCIL Purpose of report To provide Members with a report on Highway issues within Epping Forest District. To provide sufficient information on schemes so that decisions on local priorities can be made. Members are invited to offer suggestions and requests for future works. Background A programme of Capital works for 2010/11 has been implemented. This report will provide details of the programme with the status of the schemes. Members are asked to consider the schemes District wide and suggest additional schemes that might be investigated for possible inclusion in a future programme of works. Maintenance Appendix A (page 9 and 10) details the proposed Capital Maintenance Programme. Members will be pleased to note that the majority of schemes are now complete. Traffic Improvements The capital traffic schemes set for the Epping Forest District are detailed within Appendix B (page 11 and 12) Safer Roads Improvement Programme Within the Epping Forest District, two locations have been identified for the 2010/11 programme: A414 Canes Lane, North Weald Bassett The design for this scheme is now complete and a start date on site is currently being agreed with the Contractor. Officer currently anticipate that this will be December, subject to the results of the safety audit. Common Road, Roydon This scheme is now complete. Officers are also currently carrying out a route study along A113, Abridge from Ongar to Passingford Bridge. A safety audit is currently underway on the proposed design. 1 Signage for speed limit review The review within the District on speed limits to ensure that they are within the guidelines set by the Department for Transport (DfT) circular 1/2006 and the new ECC Speed Management Strategy is on going.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustrans Design Manual Chapter 7 Junctions and Crossings: Cycle Friendly Design (Draft)
    Sustrans Design Manual • Chapter 7: Junctions and crossings: cycle friendly design (draft) Sustrans Design Manual Chapter 7 Junctions and crossings: cycle friendly design (draft) February 2015 February 2015 1 Sustrans Design Manual • Chapter 7: Junctions and crossings: cycle friendly design (draft) Contents This chapter of the Sustrans Design Manual should be read 7. Crossings in conjunction with Chapter 1 “Principles and processes for General Principles and Guidance 42 cycle friendly design.” That chapter includes key guidance Cycle priority crossings 46 on core design principles, whether to integrate with or segregate from motor traffic, the space required by cyclists Uncontrolled crossings 48 and other road users as well as geometrical considerations. Types of controlled crossing 52 Readers are also directed towards the “Handbook for Signalised crossings 54 cycle-friendly design” which contains a concise illustrated Grade separated crossings 58 compendium of the technical guidance contained in the Design Manual. This chapter has initially been issued as a draft and it is intended that it be reviewed during 2015; 8. Interface with carriageway feedback on the content is invited and should be made by Overview 59 31 May 2015 to [email protected] Low angle merge and diverge facilities 60 1. Key Principles 3 Perpendicular (or high angle) transitions 62 2. Introduction 4 Culs-de-sac and road closures 65 3. General Principles and Guidance 4 Flush Kerbs 65 4. Priority Junctions 9. References 67 Overview 8 Raised table junctions 10 Modifying existing junction geometry 12 About Sustrans 5. Signalised junctions Sustrans makes smarter travel choices possible, General considerations 14 desirable and inevitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Advice on Road Crossings for Equestrians in England and Wales
    Advice on The British Road Crossings for Equestrians Horse in England and Wales Society The law and management of public access rights vary widely between the four countries of the United Kingdom. This advice note is written for England and Wales and although elements of the advice may be applicable in Scotland and Northern Ireland this cannot be assumed. If this is a saved or printed copy, please check www.bhs.org.uk/accessadvice for the latest version (date top of page 2). In providing specifications for ways and facilities for equestrians, the British Horse Society considers all equestrian users (those riding, leading or driving horses). This may result in a high specification which might not be appropriate in all circumstances. The recommendations should be read with this in mind. If the specification seems inappropriate in a situation, the Society strongly advises consultation with its local representative to establish what may be acceptable at a particular site. Sites vary so much that BHS specifications can only be general in nature and may require tailoring for any site. Routes used by equestrians include bridleways, byways, unsurfaced unclassified roads, quiet lanes, permissive paths, commons and public open space; most of which leave riders and carriage-drivers no choice but to use busy roads to reach them. Generally, crossing a main road is much preferred by equestrians as far safer than proceeding for any distance along it. An underpass or overpass are the ideal for crossing a busy road but commonly cannot be provided on the grounds of cost or available space and an at grade crossing is the only option.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Management Information System
    EXECUTIVE DATE: 20 OCTOBER 2003 SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT OF FORMAL PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS REPORT BY: HEAD OF ENGINEERING & TRANSPORTATION CONTACT OFFICER: PETER TILBURY 01582 547161 IMPLICATIONS: LEGAL STAFFING EQUALITIES COMMUNITY SAFETY FINANCIAL RISKS OTHER CONSULTATIONS: COUNCILLORS CONSULTED SCRUTINY COMMITTEE CONSULTED STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTED OTHER WARDS AFFECTED: ALL LEAD EXECUTIVE MEMBER(S): COUNCILLOR R. DAVIES RECOMMENDATION(S) 1. Executive is recommended to agree the proposed assessment criteria for the provision of formal pedestrian crossing facilities. REPORT 2. The purpose of this report is to inform the Executive of proposed assessment criteria for the provision of formal pedestrian crossing facilities. 3. In April 1995, the then Department of Transport (now the Department for Transport - DfT) issued Local Transport Notes 1/95 and 2/95 giving guidance on the assessment and design of pedestrian crossings. These guidance notes altered the previous government advice significantly, with a more thorough yet flexible approach being advocated. The guidance is solely aimed at zebra and pelican/puffin crossings and does not apply to pedestrian crossing facilities at traffic signal-controlled junctions. Based on this guidance a new criterion for the assessment of pedestrian crossings in Luton is being proposed. While the assessment is clearly somewhat involved, Members are asked to acknowledge that a wide range of factors are now taken into consideration in determining whether a pedestrian crossing is provided and can be used to rank the provision of pedestrian crossings in terms of priority. Page 1 of 13 BACKGROUND 4. The old (pre-1995) Department of Transport guidance suggested that formal pedestrian crossing facilities should be assessed on the basis of the PV² value (the factor of the square of the vehicle flow [V] at the location and the volume of pedestrians crossing [P]).
    [Show full text]
  • A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road Appendices
    Appendices A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road Monitoring and Evaluation Baseline Report Appendix A. Scheme Description Atkins A6MARR Baseline Report | Version 2.6 | April 2016 | 5124908 48 ` A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road Application for Full Approval Annex 1 Scheme Description October 2014 5124908/A6MARR_MSBC_Annex_1_Scheme_Description.docx A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road Application for Full Approval Annex 1 Scheme Approval October 2014 Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council’s information and use in relation to the A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road scheme proposal. Atkins Limited assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. Document History JOB NUMBER: 5214908 DOCUMENT REF: A6MARR_MSBC_Annex_1_Scheme_Description.docx 1 Draft GR 16/10/14 Rev Purpose Description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date 5124908/A6MARR_MSBC_Annex_1_Scheme_Description.docx A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road Application for Full Approval Annex 1 – Scheme Description Contents Section Page 1. Introduction 4 Purpose of this Document 4 2. Scheme Description 4 About the Scheme 4 Key Elements of the A6MARR Scheme 6 The Proposed A6MARR Scheme 7 Appendices Appendix A - A6MARR Highway Alignment/ Block Plans 5124908/A6MARR_MSBC_Annex_1_Scheme_Description.docx 3 A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road Application for Full Approval Annex 1 – Scheme Description 1. Introduction Purpose of this Document 1.1 This document is an Annex to the Application for Full Approval, and provides a description of the A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road (A6MARR) scheme, identifying the location and individual components of the scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Part D – Section 12
    Streetscape Guidance Part D – Physical design and materials 12. Crossings ............................................................................................ 276 12.1. Vision ............................................................................................................... 276 12.2. Tactile paving ................................................................................................... 276 12.3. Controlled crossings ........................................................................................ 289 12.4. Design objectives ............................................................................................. 292 12.5. Uncontrolled crossings .................................................................................... 303 12.6. Traffic signals and control boxes ..................................................................... 315 12.7. Grade-separated pedestrian crossings ............................................................ 319 12.8. Subways .......................................................................................................... 322 12.9. Footbridges ...................................................................................................... 326 12.10. Road bridges ................................................................................................... 327 12.11. Road underpasses ........................................................................................... 329 Crossings 275 Streetscape Guidance Part D – Physical design
    [Show full text]
  • Ch4 Junctions and Crossings
    London Cycling Design Standards consultation draft – June 2014 127 Chapter 4 – Junctions and crossings Chapter 4 Junctions and crossings 4.1 Junction design issues 128 Junction design considerations 131 Junction geometry and corner radii 132 4.2 Crossings 135 Selecting the crossing type 136 Crossings at signal-controlled junctions 137 Stand-alone signal-controlled crossing 139 Parallel priority crossings 140 Priority (zebra) crossing 141 Uncontrolled crossings 143 Pedestrian crossing of cycle tracks 144 4.3 Priority junctions 146 Refuge islands 147 Entry treatments, raised tables and footway build-outs 150 Road markings through junctions 154 4.4 Signal-controlled junctions 156 Procedures for traffic signals 158 Separate signalling for cyclists 159 Managing conflict with left-turning traffic 162 Support for cyclists making right turns 165 Banning selected vehicle movements 167 Lanes marked through junctions 168 Advanced Stop Lines 169 Bus lanes at signal controlled junctions 176 4.5 Roundabouts and gyratories 177 Normal and signalised roundabouts 178 Mini-Roundabouts 180 Compact and continental roundabouts 180 Roundabouts with annular cycle lanes 182 'Dutch style' roundabouts with segregated cycle lanes 183 Informal roundabouts 184 Gyratories and one-way systems 185 London Cycling Design Standards consultation draft – June 2014 128 Chapter 4 – Junctions and crossings 4.1 Junction design issues 4.1.1 This chapter provides design guidance on the use and adaptation of junctions and crossings to form safer, coherent and comfortable cycling provision, while maintaining optimum accessibility for pedestrians. It is organised according to four categories: crossings, priority junctions (where vehicles on one route have priority over an intersecting route), signal controlled junctions, and roundabouts (including gyratories).
    [Show full text]
  • 01491 825038 E-Mail: [email protected]
    BENSON PARISH COUNCIL Benson Parish Hall, Sunnyside, Benson, Wallingford, OX10 6LZ Tel: 01491 825038 E-mail: [email protected] Minutes of the Full Council meeting of Benson Parish Council held on Thursday 25th July 2019 at 7:30pm in the Parish Hall Committee Room Present: Cllr B Pattison (Chairman) Cllr P Baylis Cllr R Jordan Cllr T McTeague Cllr P Murray Cllr J Sharman Cllr I Skeels Cllr T Stevenson Cllr M Winton Proper Officer: E Stanley (Parish Clerk) In attendance: SODC Cllr A Powell Reporter from the Henley Standard 17 Members of the Public Item 12 on the agenda was brought forward (see item 12) 1. Apologies Apologies were received from Cllrs F Lovesey, S McCann and D Olley, and District Cllr S Cooper 2. Declarations of interest Cllrs J Sharman and T Stevenson declared interests in item 15.c.i. 3. To receive reports from the following: a. Cllr M Gray – OCC Member Cllr Gray was not present. b. Cllr S Cooper – SODC Member Cllr Cooper was not present c. Cllr A Powell – SODC Member Cllr A Powel presented her written report (see attached) Cllr B Pattison expressed the importance of cycleways needing to be maintained and kept clear of overgrowth. Cllr P Murray asked if SODC is consulting with Oxford City Council and Cllr A Powell confirmed that Oxford City Council is in the Oxfordshire Partnership and part of consultations. Cllr J Sharman asked if SODC has plans to scrap or review the non-disclosure agreement that was signed by the previous term’s Council with relation to the Oxford-Cambridge Expressway.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best Things in Museums Are the Windows Archive Organized by Project Title
    Portland State University PDXScholar The Best Things in Museums are the Windows Archive Organized by Project Title 7-18-2013 The Best Things in Museums are the Windows Harrell Fletcher Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/museum_windows Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Fletcher, Harrell, "The Best Things in Museums are the Windows" (2013). The Best Things in Museums are the Windows. 1. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/museum_windows/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Best Things in Museums are the Windows by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. THE BEST THINGS IN MUSEUMS ARE ■mm. Walking, Participation & the Expanded Classroom f THE BEST THINGS IN MUSEUMS ARE THE WINDOWS Walking, Participation & the Expanded Classroom HARRELL FLETCHER • THE EXPLORATORIUM y CONTENTS Let’s Take a Walk Marina McDougall 4 The Best Things in Muséums Are the Windows Harrell Fletcher 8 Everyone Is You and Me Jordan Stein 10 Seven Windows Shannon Jackson 18 Walking Harrell Fletcher 26 A Walking Acrostic jason Groves 28 A View from the Edge: The Peripatetic Perspective Jason Groves 34 Collaboration Harrell Fletcher 40 Where We Went and What We Did 42 (pages 4-8) As a pedestrian one encounters,oddities and marvels such as these found along The Windows' four-day trek. Let’s Take a Walk In the summer of 2013, the Exploratorium hosted Harrell Fletcher’s The Best Things in Museums Are the Marina McDougall Windows, an ambitious four-day trek to the top of Mount Diablo from the eastern end of our site at Pier 15 on San Francisco’s downtown waterfront.
    [Show full text]
  • Leicester Street Design Guide First Edition June 2020 Leicester - Street Design Guide
    Leicester Street Design Guide First Edition June 2020 Leicester - Street Design Guide FOREWORD The Leicester Street Design Guide draws on best practice from within our city, from across the UK This First Edition of the Leicester Street Design and internationally. Whilst our city is unique, Guide is published during the unprecedented the challenges we face are not. Adopting the Covid-19 crisis, giving it a new relevance we could Healthy Streets Assessment method will help us have never imagined when we first embarked on to identify priorities, consider design options and this major project many months ago. achieve accessible and consistent street design that recognises the needs of all our residents. We Back then climate change, economic uncertainty encourage other local authorities to apply this and matters of public health and wellbeing acted as guide, to their unique place, where applicable. a stimulus, but now we have a climate emergency to respond to and all the health, economic and This document is the result of work and input from wider social uncertainty that the present pandemic very many experts and stakeholders. Particular brings. thanks must be given to Brian Deegan of Urban Movement as the City Mayor’s Healthy Streets A decade ago, we began the Connecting Leicester Advisor, Phil Jones Associates who gave specific programme. Since then new public squares, support for the Planning & Design Element improved cycling and walking infrastructure Sheets, Officers of Leicester City Council and and even wider pedestrianisation of our city has those many representatives of disability groups, transformed the city’s landscape: promoting transport campaign organisations and others, who sustainable, active travel and a healthy economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Report
    2020/05/06 21:05 1/68 Report Report Smart pedestrian crossing Author(s): Bárbara Cruz Caruso David van Duivenboden Jens Hoernschemeyer Solenne Peytard Jan Starosta Charlie Stenskie Acknowledgement Glossary Abbreviation Description EPS European Project Semester ISEP Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto USB Universal Serial Bus NCHS The National Center for Health Statistics National Highway Traffic Safety NHTSA Administration LF Low Frequency HF High Frequency UHF Ultra High Frequency NFC Near-Field Communication RFID Radio-Frequency Identification USB Universal Serial Bus HID Human Interface Device SPI Serial Peripheral Interface EPS@ISEP - http://www.eps2020-wiki6.dee.isep.ipp.pt/ Last update: 2020/05/06 15:35 report http://www.eps2020-wiki6.dee.isep.ipp.pt/doku.php?id=report Abbreviation Description ISP Internet Service Provider CAN Controller Area Network ADC Analog to Digital Converter DAC Digital to Analog Converter HD High-Definition HDMI High-Definition Multimedia Interface X10CrNi18-8 Stainless Steel PE-HD Polyethylene High-Density ABS Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene POM-C Polyoxymethylene ECEC European Council of Engineers Chambers 1 Introduction In this chapter our project will be introduced to you. You will discover our team, the goals of this project and why we decided to work on this subject. Then, you will have an overview of the organization of the project and of the structure of the report. 1.1 Presentation Team 6, better known as Team Schnabeltier (German for platypus), consists of six team members from different countries
    [Show full text]
  • Pedestrian Crossings
    Appendix 10 Pedestrian Crossings The design of controlled pedestrian crossing facilities (Puffin, Toucan, Pegasus and Zebra) will be in accordance with all relevant current standards and will take into account all current design guidance. Any departure from current design standards and any significant departure from current design guidance must be approved by the Service Director, Infrastructure Management & Operations. Choosing which crossing is most appropriate and indeed where it should go is a sometimes difficult job as there are many competing demands and criteria related to safety and amenity that must be fulfilled in order for the crossing to be well used and beneficial to the travelling public. A PUFFIN CROSSING is a signal controlled pedestrian crossing where the lights controlling the pedestrians are on the near side of the road. The system also utilises sensors which detect the presence of pedestrians waiting at the crossing and as they are crossing the road. If after pushing the button the pedestrian decides to cross before the 'green man' appears, the sensor detects this movement and can automatically cancel the requested 'demand' if there is no one else waiting to cross. A TOUCAN CROSSING is a signal controlled pedestrian crossing that also allows bicycles to be ridden across. A PEGASUS CROSSING is a signalised pedestrian crossing with special consideration for horse riders. At a minimum, these crossings are in the form of a pelican crossing but simply have two control panels, one at the normal height for pedestrians or dismounted riders, and another one two metres above the ground for the use of mounted riders.
    [Show full text]