The Challenge of Constructing Legitimacy in Peacebuilding: Case of Timor-Leste
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CENTRE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS CIR Working Paper No. 48 March 2009 UN Photo by Marco Dormino The Challenge of Constructing Legitimacy in Peacebuilding: Case of Timor-Leste Daisaku Higashi CIR Working Paper No. 48 i Abstract It appears to be a widely shared understanding that it is imperative for peacebuilders to construct legitimacy in the eyes of local people and leaders. Surprisingly, however, the concrete methods or policies to obtain this “local legitimacy” have not been fully examined. The objective of this report is to address this critical question by examining key policies regarding legitimacy construction in Timor-Leste peacebuilding. The report is based on more than 45 individual interviews with key political leaders as well as a total of 319 opinion surveys in three districts. ii Challenge of Constructing Legitimacy in Peacebuilding: Timor-Leste The Author Daisaku Higashi is a doctoral candidate in Political Science at the University of British Columbia. Obtaining a research grant awarded by the Toyota Foundation, Higashi is currently conducting field research in both Afghanistan and Timor-Leste. Higashi’s another report “Challenge of Constructing Legitimacy in Peacebulding: Case of Afghanistan” was published from the Department of Peacekeeping Operations at the UN Headquarters. CIR Working Paper No. 48 iii Preface and Acknowledgements Legitimacy in world politics has been the focus of both global attention and scholarly study in recent years, yet its role in peacebuilding has not been well studied. It is often remarked in both public and scholarly discourse that legitimacy is critical for success in creating sustainable peace in war-torn states; Larry Diamond, a political scientist who worked as a political advisor to the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq, asserts, “the first lesson of America’s experience in Iraq is that… any effort at administration and reconstruction of the post-conflict state must mobilize legitimacy, both internally in the post-conflict country as well as internationally.”1 It appears to be a widely shared understanding that it is imperative for peacebuilders to obtain or construct legitimacy in the eyes of local people and leaders. Surprisingly, however, the concrete methods or policies to obtain this “local legitimacy” in the host states have not been fully examined. The objective of this report is to address this critical question by examining key policies regarding legitimacy construction in the specific context of Timor-Leste peacebuilding. I have already conducted research with the same question in Afghanistan and completed my report titled, “Challenge of Constructing Legitimacy in Peacebuilding: Case of Afghanistan”, which has been posted on the website of the Best Practices Section in the Department of Peacekeeping Operations at the UN Headquarters, and was widely shared by UN officials, government officials (in both the Afghan government and donor states), and academic scholars. I believe that accumulated case studies will demonstrate policy implications for both ongoing and future peacebuilding efforts. I wish to thank Carolyn McAskie, former Assistant Secretary-General for Peacebuilding Support, who introduced me and my research proposal to numerous UN peacebuilders and key officials in UN missions. In her letter, she endorsed my project as research “which will shed much-needed light on an issue which perhaps more than any other affects the success or failure of international peacebuilding efforts.” Yukio Takasu, the Permanent Representative of the Japanese Mission at the UN, and Kenzou Oshima, the former Permanent Representative of the Japanese Mission at the UN, also supported my research with written endorsements. Nelson Santos, Timor-Leste Ambassador to the United Nations also gave me great cooperation to realize my field research. The United Nations Integration Mission in Timor-Leste (UNMIT) gave me special cooperation to accomplish this research. I also appreciate the cooperation of the Japan embassy in Timor-Leste, including Iwao Kitahara, the Japanese ambassador in Timor-Leste. I am sincerely thankful for the precious advice I received from Fatemeh Ziai, the former acting director of the best practices unit at the Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) and current director of the integrated training section at DPKO. I am also extremely grateful to Dr. Richard Price, Dr. Katharina Coleman, and Dr. Brian Job for their academic support and advice at UBC. 1 Diamond 2006, 34. Emphasis added. iv Challenge of Constructing Legitimacy in Peacebuilding: Timor-Leste Financially, I deeply appreciate the Toyota Foundation, which funded my field research in Afghanistan and Timor-Leste. I also would like to send my many thanks to all UN officials, officials in ISF (International Stabilization Forces), and all Timorese who cooperated with my interviews. Thanks to their cooperation, I conducted individual interviews with over 20 international officials, several cabinet members of the Timor-Leste government, more than 10 central government officials, several top leaders from FRETILIN, currently the largest opposition party, leaders in F-FDTL (Timor-Leste National Army), and leaders in PNTL (Timor-Leste National Police), as well as 319 ordinary Timorese citizens who responded to my opinion survey. This paper reflects the views of the author and does not represent the policies of the Department of Peacekeeping Operations or of the United Nations or the Government of Japan. I hope that my research and report can make a contribution to ongoing efforts for peacebuilding in Timor-Leste as well as future peacebuilding efforts in the world. CIR Working Paper No. 48 v Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. i Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 • Hypothesis and Methods • Key Recommendations I. Enhancing the Dialogue in Local Areas to Address Gap among People with Regard to the Legitimacy of the Government and Elections..................................................................................... 3 • Background • Embedded Divide in Legitimacy of the Government and Elections • Policy Recommendations II. Setting up a Joint Field Monitoring Committee that Will Monitor the “Security Sector Reform” to assess the Timing of UN Police Withdrawal ...................................................................................... 6 • Background • Security Situation, Expectation, and Reality • Challenge of Reforming PNTL (1) Capacity Building • Challenge of Reforming PNTL (2) Avoid Politicization • Policy Recommendations III. Initiating Community-Based Development Projects to Create Job Opportunities for Timorese People across the Country by Using the Sustainable Petroleum Fund ........................................... 10 • Background • Challenge: How to Satisfy the Young Labors in Timor-Leste • Policy Recommendations IV. Lesson from the Past on Timor-Leste Peacebuilding ................................................................. 13 • Substantial Support for “Timorization efforts” by UNTAET and Sergio de Mello • Outcomes of Cheap Exits: Automatic Transfer from Constitutional Assembly to Parliament • Role of the UN: Comparative Advantage of UN Peacekeepers and Multinational Forces V. Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 17 Appendix 1: Results of Opinion Survey in Timor-Leste in November 2008 ..................................... 19 Appendix 2: Graphs: Hypothesis on Constructing Domestic Legitimacy in Peacebuilding.............. 31 Appendix 3: Acronyms ..................................................................................................................... 32 Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................... 33 vi Challenge of Constructing Legitimacy in Peacebuilding: Timor-Leste CIR Working Paper No. 48 1 Introduction peacebuilding process. And repeated compliance with these political developments will enhance the creation of legitimate Hypothesis and Methods governments; on the other hand, repeated noncompliance will erode the legitimacy of governments. The purpose of this research is to address the question, “What are effective policies for In my hypothesis, there is one intermediate international and domestic peacebuilders to factor between these five factors and construct domestic legitimacy in the process compliance behaviors: the “credibility as of peacebuilding?” In other words, the impartial,” which peacebuilders should research seeks effective policies for create and enhance. For example, when peacebuilders to create “legitimate domestic factions perceive that governments,” under which a majority of peacebuilders are credible, fair, and people comply with the rules of government impartial, it is more likely that domestic in voluntary mode. As for the definition of factions will participate in elections and legitimacy, Thomas Frank argues “legitimacy accept their results, as they can perceive that exerts a pull to compliance which is powered their political rights will be protected even by the quality of the rule or of the rule-making after they lose elections, and their institution and not by coercive authority. It