The Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Global Financial Markets: a Qualitative Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Global Financial Markets: a Qualitative Analysis 2994 Brazilian Journals of Business The impact of covid-19 pandemic on global financial markets: a qualitative analysis El impacto de la pandemia del covid-19 en los mercados financieros globales: un análisis cualitativo DOI: 10.34140/bjbv2n3-075 Recebimento dos originais: 20/05//2020 Aceitação para publicação: 20/06/2020 Richard A. Ajayi University of Central Florida 12744 Pegasus Drive, Orlando, FL, USA E-mail: [email protected] Fuzuli Aliyev Baku Engineering University Baku, AZ0101 Azerbaijan E-mail: [email protected] Teymur Sarkhanov Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC) Baku, Istiqlaliyyat str.6, AZ1001 Azerbaijan Sakarya University, Turkey teymur E-mail: [email protected] RESUMEN Justo después del acuerdo comercial de fase uno acordado entre los EE. UU. Y China, el mundo se ve envuelto en una gran pandemia de infección por coronavirus. El coronavirus ha afectado a casi todos los sectores de la vida, incluidos todos los lados de la economía y los mercados financieros. Ha provocado fuertes caídas en la demanda y ha ralentizado considerablemente las actividades económicas. El brote del virus se ha convertido en una de las mayores amenazas para la economía mundial y los mercados financieros. Las empresas en la era de la globalización son muy interdependientes a través de la integración económica y las cadenas de suministro globales. Debido a los bloqueos concomitantes de la pandemia, las empresas globales experimentan interrupciones en las producciones, suministros, transportes y ventas. Estos resultan en fuertes disminuciones de los ingresos y en quiebras de varias empresas. Los precios de las acciones reaccionan rápidamente a estos choques. Pero no todas las acciones de la empresa reaccionan de la misma manera. Por lo tanto, separamos los impactos en dos grupos. Analizamos el impacto del coronavirus en los mercados financieros desarrollados y emergentes. Los mercados financieros desarrollados representados por los mercados de EE. UU. Y Europa son capaces de gestionar de manera justa las turbulencias iniciales en los mercados de acciones y bonos. Los bancos centrales de estas economías pueden responder de inmediato recortando las tasas de interés, aunque estas acciones no estabilizaron el mercado de manera adecuada. Los mercados emergentes representados por China, India, Brasil, México, Rusia, Indonesia y Turquía sufren en mayor medida el virus en forma de trastornos económicos, devaluaciones monetarias y altos aumentos del desempleo. Este documento destaca los impactos del virus en los dos grupos de mercados financieros de forma cualitativa. Los hallazgos sugieren que los responsables de la formulación de políticas, las autoridades reguladoras y los inversores deben tomar medidas para mantener los mercados financieros funcionando de manera eficiente en estos tiempos Braz. J. of Bus., Curitiba, v. 2, n. 3, p. 2994-3001, jul. /set. 2020. ISSN 2596-1934 2995 Brazilian Journals of Business difíciles. Esta es la versión revisada del documento presentado en la Conferencia 55th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development en Bakú, Azerbaiyán. Palabras-clave: Coronavirus, mercados financieros, mercados emergentes, mercados desarrollados ABSTRACT Just after the agreed Phase One trade deal between the US and China, the world becomes gripped ina major pandemic of coronavirus infection. The coronavirus has affected almost all sectors of life, including all sides of the economy and financial markets. It has caused sharp decreases in demand and greatly slowed down economic activities. The virus outbreak has become one of the biggest threats to the global economy and financial markets. Companies in the age of globalizationare very interdependent through economic integration and global supplychains. Due to attendant lockdowns of the pandemic, global companies experience disruptions in productions, supplies, transportations and sales. These result in sharp decreases in incomes as well as bankruptcies of several firms. Stock prices react to these shocks rapidly. But not all company stocks react the same way. Thus, we separate the impacts into two groups. We analyse the impact of coronavirus on developed and emerging financial markets. Developed financial markets represented by the US, and European markets are able to fairly manage the initial turbulences in stock and bond markets. Central banks of these economies are able to immediately respond by cutting interest rates, thoughthese actions did not stabilize the market adequately. Emerging markets represented by China, India, Brazil, Mexico, Russia, Indonesia and Turkey suffer greater from the virus in the forms of economic disruptions, currency devaluations and high increases in unemployment. This paper highlights the impacts of the virus on the two groups of financial markets in a qualitative way. The findingssuggest steps to be taken bypolicy makers, regulatory authorities and investors to keep financial markets operating efficiently in these troubled times. Keywords: Coronavirus, financial markets, emerging markets, developed markets 1 INTRODUCCIÓN The world continues to experience a major pandemic of coronavirus (Covid-19) infection. The new pandemic began in Wuhan, Hubei, China, in late 2019. It was originally called 2019-nCoV and renamed COVID-19 by the World Health Organization (WHO) on February 11, 2020. The WHO, on March 11, declared COVID-19 a pandemic, pointing to the over 118,000 cases of the virusinfection at that time in over 110 countries and territories around the world and the potential risk of further global spread. By late January 2020 Chinese authorities confirmed that the virus had killed 80 people and infected almost 3,000 more. They warned that its spread could accelerate still, with the millions of people traveling all over the country for the Chinese Lunar New Year celebrations. These trips could spreadthe virus abroad. The outbreak of Coronavirus has caused a pandemic of respiratory diseases for which vaccines and targeted therapeutics for treatment are unavailable (Wang et al. 2020). The coronavirus has affected almost all sectors of life, including economies and financial markets. The Braz. J. of Bus., Curitiba, v. 2, n. 3, p. 2994-3001, jul. /set. 2020. ISSN 2596-1934 2996 Brazilian Journals of Business virus outbreak has now become one of the biggest threats to the global economy and financial markets. Even though the novel virus outbreak started in December 2019, financial markets did not react immediately as there was little information on how long it might last, whether China would be able to quickly contain it and prevent it from spreading to other countries, and the risks that a spread would pose for the global economy. There are several papers in literature studying impact of epidemics and a few specifically of Covid-19 on the economy and finance. Chen et. al (2007) examine the impact of the SARS outbreak on Taiwanese hotel stock performance. They find Taiwanese hotel stocks show significantly negative cumulative mean abnormal returns, indicating a significant impact of the SARS outbreak on hotel stocks performance. Yang et al. (2020) study the impact of the coronavirus outbreak on tourism. Employing dynamic, stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models, they report that the coronavirus outbreak hinders tourism, consumption, and healthcare systems, and induces welfare levels decline. To facilitate post-crisis tourism recovery, they propose stimulus vouchers for residents to support tourism. Kim et al. (2020) research the impact of infectious and macroscopic epidemic disease outbreaks on financial performance of the restaurant industry. They find negative influence of epidemic disease outbreaks on the restaurant industry, and identify firm characteristics that serve as risk-mitigating factors. Financial markets have reacted to recent unpredictability in economic activities with large drops, triggering circuit breakers on US exchanges four times in March 2020. This safeguard mechanism pauses trading for 15 minutes in hopes that the market will calm down. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission mandated the creation of market-wide circuit-breakers to prevent a repeat of the Oct. 19, 1987 market crash, in which the DOW plunged 22.6%. Since then, circuit-breakershave only been triggered once in 1997 before the four times in March 2020. 2 IMPACT OF OUTBREAK ON THE DEVELOPED MARKETS US tech companies rely heavily on China to manufacture their products, so it’s no surprise to see supply chain disruptions severely impact tech giantslike Microsoft, Apple, HP and etc. Microsoft’s shares fell in February 2020, and so did those of chipmakers Intel and AMD, two of its major suppliers. Then again, late February 2020 saw the four consecutive days of virus-related declines for the whole of the US stock market. And as if to add fuel to the fire, new data arrived showing US factory orders for big-ticket items (like cars and appliances) falling in January – even before the worst of the virus had emerged. On Monday, February 24, 2020, the DowJones Industrial Average and FTSE 100 dropped more than 3% as the outlook for the spreadof coronavirusworsened Braz. J. of Bus., Curitiba, v. 2, n. 3, p. 2994-3001, jul. /set. 2020. ISSN 2596-1934 2997 Brazilian Journals of Business substantiallyoutside China over the weekend. This was followedby benchmark indices falling sharply in continental Europe after steep declines across Asia. Developed market indices such as DAX, CAC-40 and IBEX 35 each fell by about 4% and the FTSE MIB fell
Recommended publications
  • Panic, Prosperity, and Progress Founded in 1807, John Wiley & Sons Is the Oldest Independent Publishing Company in the United States
    PANIC, PROSPERITY, AND PROGRESS Founded in 1807, John Wiley & Sons is the oldest independent publishing company in the United States. With offices in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia, Wiley is globally committed to developing and marketing print and electronic products and services for our customers’ professional and personal knowledge and understanding. The Wiley Trading series features books by traders who have survived the market’s ever changing temperament and have prospered—some by reinventing systems, others by getting back to basics. Whether a novice trader, professional, or somewhere in-between, these books will provide the advice and strategies needed to prosper today and well into the future. For more on this series, visit our website at www.WileyTrading.com. PANIC, PROSPERITY, AND PROGRESS Five Centuries of History and the Markets Timothy Knight Cover Design: Wiley Cover Illustration: top: © gettyimages.com/Robin Bartholick; background: © gettyimages.com/ Keystone-France; bottom: © gettyimages.com/DEA/A. Dagli Orti Copyright © 2014 by Timothy Knight. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the Web at www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Explanation, Idealization, and Universality in Econophysics
    Market Crashes as Critical Phenomena? Explanation, Idealization, and Universality in Econophysics Jennifer Jhun Department of Philosophy Lake Forest College Patricia Palacios Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München James Owen Weatherall Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science University of California, Irvine Abstract: We study the Johansen-Ledoit-Sornette (JLS) model of financial market crashes (Johansen, Ledoit, and Sornette [2000,]. "Crashes as Critical Points." Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finan 3(2) 219- 255). On our view, the JLS model is a curious case from the perspective of the recent philosophy of science literature, as it is naturally construed as a “minimal model” in the sense of Batterman and Rice (Batterman and Rice [2014] “Minimal Model Explanations.” Phil. Sci. 81(3): 349–376. ) that nonetheless provides a causal explanation of market crashes, in the sense of Woodward’s interventionist account of causation (Woodward [2003]. Making Things Happen. Oxford: Oxford University Press). Keywords: Johansen-Ledoit-Sornette Model; Econophysics; Renormalization group; Minimal Models; Explanation; Universality; Infinite Idealization 1. Introduction Mainstream economic models of financial markets have long been criticized on the grounds that they fail to accurately account for the frequency of extreme events, including market crashes. Mandelbrot and Hudson (2004) put the point starkly in their discussion of the August 1998 crash: “By the conventional wisdom, August 1998 simply should never have happened. The standard theories estimate the odds of that final, August 31, collapse, at one in 20 million, an event that, if you traded daily for nearly 100,000 years, you would not expect to see even once.
    [Show full text]
  • Weak-Form Efficiency in Karachi Stock Exchange; Evidence from Random Walk Hypothesis
    Weak-Form Efficiency in Karachi Stock Exchange; Evidence from Random Walk Hypothesis A thesis submitted as the partial requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Economics) by Ms. Musarrat Shamshir M.A.S. (Economics) Applied Economics Research Center, University of Karachi MSc. (Economics) University of Karachi Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences University of Karachi, Pakistan February 2015 Declaration I hereby declare that the thesis, entitled, “Weak-Form Efficiency in Karachi Stock Exchange; Evidence from Random Walk Hypothesis,” contains no such material that has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at any university or equivalent institution and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference is made in the text of the thesis. This thesis includes two original papers published entitled, “Presence of Day-of-the-Week Effect in the Karachi Stock Market” and “Efficiency in stock markets; A review of literature”, in international peer reviewed journals. The subject matter of the thesis is based on weak-form efficiency of Karachi stock market. I am responsible for the idea and development of the thesis under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Khalid Mustafa. Musarrat Shamshir February 12, 2015. ii Department of Economics University of Karachi February 14, 2015 Approval of PhD Thesis This is to certify that Ms. Musarrat Shamshir, D/o Shamshir Ahmad (late) has completed her dissertation entitled “Weak-Form Efficiency in Karachi Stock Exchange; Evidence from Random Walk Hypothesis,” as the partial requirement for PhD degree, under my supervision.
    [Show full text]
  • Based on Machine Learning Methods a Thesis Submitted in Partial
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Stock Trend Prediction: Based on Machine Learning Methods Athesissubmittedinpartialsatisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Applied Statistics by Yuan Song 2018 c Copyright by Yuan Song 2018 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Stock Trend Prediction: Based on Machine Learning Methods by Yuan Song Master of Applied Statistics University of California, Los Angeles, 2018 Professor Yingnian Wu, Chair Nowadays, people show more and more enthusiasm for applying machine learning methods to finance domain. Many scholars and investors are trying to discover the mystery behind the stock market by applying deep learning. This thesis compares four machine learning methods: long short-term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent units (GRU), support vector machine (SVM), and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) to test which one performs the best in predicting the stock trend. I chose stock price indicators from 20 well-known public companies and calculated their related technical indicators as inputs, which are Relative Strength Index, the Average Directional Movement Index, and the Parabolic Stop and Re- verse. Experimental results show that recurrent neural network outperforms in time-series related prediction. Especially for gated recurrent units, its accuracy rate is around 5% higher than support vector machine and eXtreme gradient boosting. ii The thesis of Yuan Song is approved. Nicolas Christou Hongquan Xu Yingnian Wu, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2018 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ...................................... 1 2 Literature Review .................................. 4 2.1 Previous Stock Prediction . 4 2.2 NeuralNetwork.................................. 4 2.3 Classification . 6 3 Financial Definition ................................. 7 3.1 Stock Market . 7 3.2 Stock Trend Definition .
    [Show full text]
  • FX Execution Algorithms and Market Functioning
    Markets Committee FX execution algorithms and market functioning Report submitted by a Study Group established by the Markets Committee The Group was chaired by Andréa M Maechler (Swiss National Bank) October 2020 JEL classification: F31, G14, G15 Keywords: FX market, price discovery, execution trilemma This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). © Bank for International Settlements 2020. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. ISBN 978-92-9259-428-2 (online) Preface The FX market has undergone significant structural change in recent years. The proliferation of multiple trading venues has led to increased fragmentation, and trading has become more electronic and automated. This has fuelled an increase in the use of FX execution algorithms (EAs), including by bank and non-bank financial institutions, and certain non-financial corporates. To understand the drivers and implications of the rising use of EAs in FX markets, the Markets Committee established in mid-2019 a Study Group chaired by Andréa M Maechler (Swiss National Bank). This report presents the Group’s findings. In addition to data analysis and research, it draws on a unique survey among providers and users of EAs, as well as extensive industry-wide outreach. The key takeaway of the report is that EAs support price discovery and market functioning in an increasingly fragmented market. However, they also contribute to the ongoing changes in market structure, and with increasing scale of use, give rise to new risks and challenges that warrant close monitoring. The report provides unique insights into central banks’ use of EAs, and preliminary observations on the performance and use of EAs during a period of high volatility due to the COVID-19 crisis-induced market disruption in March 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncorrected Proof
    International Review of Economics and Finance xxx (xxxx) xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Review of Economics and Finance journal homepage: www.elsevier.com A survey on the magnet effect of circuit breakers in financial markets Imtiaz Mohammad Sifat a, Azhar Mohamad b,∗ a Department of Economics and Finance, Sunway University, No. 5, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Sunway, 47500, Selangor, Malaysia b Department of Finance, Kulliyyah of Economics and Management Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia, 53100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia PROOF ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT JEL classification: Proponents of circuit breakers justify the practice citing its utility in placating stressed markets, D47 persuading agents to reflect on available information, and to trade rationally. Opponents counter D53 by calling it an infringement on laissez-faire price discovery process citing the lack of conclusive G15 evidence of their effectiveness in market crises. After nearly three decades of theoretical and em- G18 pirical scrutiny, this discord persists. Most of the empirical focus in this domain revolves around ex-post performance of circuit breakers in cooling off the market, interference in trading, volatility Keywords: splattering, and delayed assimilation of information. A less explored hypothesis is a potential for Circuit breakers traders to hasten trading plans fearing illiquidity or trading blockade. Thus, the existence of the Financial markets circuit breaker alone can induce its tripping. Known formally as the magnet effect, this hypothe- Price limits sis remains less explored due–inter alia–to paucity of data and methodological limitations. Greater Trading halts Volatility spillover availability of high-frequency datasets in recent times, however, has spurred a growth in empiri- cal works focusing purely on the magnet effect hypothesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Trading Glossary
    A shares This term has two distinct meanings with relatively equal usage. For stocks... Abandon To not exercise or sell an option by expiry. An Abandoned Option is one that... Abandonment option To not exercise or sell an option by expiry. An Abandoned Option is one that... Abatement Generally, abatement is a reduction or lessoning in intensity. In taxes, abatement... ABC agreement When a brokerage firm purchases a New York Stock Exchange membership for an... ABC Consumer Comfort Index - United States Assessment of consumer sentiment toward the economy based on telephone interviews... Abeyance Estate with no legal title holder or owner. Property is typically set in Abeyance... Ability to pay Generally, ability to pay refers to one's ability to meet existing or future... Above par Refers to the situation where the market value of a security (stock or bond)... Absolute advantage The ability of one state, country, or entity to produce a given service or good... Absolute priority rule The absolute priority rule specifies the peeking order of creditors during bankruptcy... Absorbed The term is applied in financial context similarly to its laymen use1 When business... Absorption rate Absorption Rate refers to the ability at which properties are able to be sold... Abstract of title A transaction record for a piece of land, recording transfers and claims that... Abusive tax shelter An abusive tax shelter refers to illegally reducing one's tax obligations.... Accelerated benefits Accelerated Benefits are an insurance option where policy holders may access... Accelerated Cost Recovery System The current method of gauging asset depreciation, as required by the United..
    [Show full text]
  • Assets of Money Market Mutual Funds
    <TEXT TYPE="BRIEF">&#2; 1094 ******<TITLE>ASSETS OF MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS ROSE 720.4 MLN DLRS IN LATEST WEEK 1095: </TITLE>Blah blah blah. 1096 &#3; 1097 .... 1112 <TEXT TYPE="BRIEF">&#2; 1113 ******<TITLE>U.S. TAX WRITERS SEEK ESTATE TAX CURBS, RAISING 6.7 BILLION DLRS THRU 1991 1114: </TITLE>Blah blah blah. 1115 &#3; 1116 .... 2454 <TEXT TYPE="BRIEF">&#2; 2455 ******<TITLE>U.S. COMMERCIAL PAPER FALLS 375 MLN DLRS IN FEB 18 WEEK, FED SAYS 2456: </TITLE>Blah blah blah. 2457 &#3; 2458 .... 2473 <TEXT TYPE="BRIEF">&#2; 2474 ******<TITLE>N.Y. BUSINESS LOANS FALL 195 MLN DLRS IN FEB 18 WEEK, FED SAYS 2475: </TITLE>Blah blah blah. 2476 &#3; 2477 .... 2492 <TEXT TYPE="BRIEF">&#2; 2493 ******<TITLE>NEW YORK BANK DISCOUNT WINDOW BORROWINGS 64 MLN DLRS IN FEB 25 WEEK 2494: </TITLE>Blah blah blah. 2495 &#3; 2496 .... 2908 <TEXT TYPE="BRIEF">&#2; 2909 ******<TITLE>U.S. M-1 MONEY SUPPLY RISES 2.1 BILLION DLRS IN FEB 16 WEEK, FED SAYS 2910: </TITLE>Blah blah blah. 2911 &#3; 2912 .... 2951 <TEXT TYPE="BRIEF">&#2; 2952 ******<TITLE>U.S. BANK DISCOUNT BORROWINGS AVERAGE 310 MLN DLRS IN FEB 25 WEEK, FED SAYS 2953: </TITLE>Blah blah blah. 2954 &#3; 2955 .... 2970 <TEXT TYPE="BRIEF">&#2; 2971 ******<TITLE>U.S. BANK NET FREE RESERVES 644 MLN DLRS IN TWO WEEKS TO FEB 25, FED SAYS 2972: </TITLE>Blah blah blah. 2973 &#3; 2974 .... 4084 <TEXT TYPE="BRIEF">&#2; 4085 ******<TITLE>NORTHERN TELECOM PROPOSES TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK SPLIT 4086: </TITLE>Blah blah blah. 4087 &#3; 4088 ...
    [Show full text]
  • Sovereign Wealth Funds Under Austerity the Sky Did Not Fall
    cover_report_SIL.2016 oK_cover_report_SIL.2016.qxd 23/06/16 12:23 Pagina 2 BAFFI CAREFIN Centre for Applied Research on International Markets, Banking, Finance and Regulation Luigi Bocconi Sovereign Investment Lab Università Commerciale The Sky Did Not Fall Sovereign Wealth Fund contact info Annual Report 2015 phone +39.02 58365306 [email protected] Sovereign Wealth Funds www.bafficarefin.unibocconi.it/sil under Austerity Sovereign Wealth Fund Annual Report 2016 With the support of cover_report_SIL.2016 oK_cover_report_SIL.2016.qxd 23/06/16 12:23 Pagina 4 design: studio Cappellato e L aurent – Milan aurent design: studio Cappellato e L Sovereign Investment Lab Research and educational partner of The Sovereign Investment Lab is a group of researchers brought together in the Baffi Carefin Centre For Applied Research on International Markets, Banking, Finance and Regulation at Bocconi University. The Lab tracks the trends of sovereign fund investment activity worldwide and conducts path- breaking research on the rise of the State as an investor in the global economy. Research output aims to meet the highest scientific standards, but also to be accessible for a variety of stakeholders also outside academia: institutional investors, policymakers, regulators, and the media. Editor Bernardo Bortolotti Director, Sovereign Investment Lab Bocconi University and Università degli Studi di Torino [email protected] int_report_SIL.2016_int_report_SIL.2016.qxd 23/06/16 12:10 Pagina 1 Contents 3 From the Editor 7 Introducing Sovereign
    [Show full text]
  • CFTC Concept Release on Risk Controls and System
    Futures Industry Association 2001 Pennsylvania Ave. NW 202.466.5460 Suite 600 202.296.3184 fax Washington, DC 20006-1823 www.futuresindustry.org December 11, 2013 Via Electronic Submission Ms. Melissa D. Jurgens, Secretary of the Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street NW. Washington, DC 20581 Re: Concept Release on Risk Controls and System Safeguards for Automated Trading Environments RIN 3038-AD52; 78 FR 56542 Dear Ms. Jurgens: The Futures Industry Association 1 (“FIA”) appreciates the opportunity to respond to the questions posed in the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (“CFTC’s”) Concept Release on Risk Control and System Safeguards for Automated Trading Environments published in the Federal Register on September 12, 2013. As acknowledged throughout the Concept Release and described more fully in our responses, FIA member firms have been in the forefront of efforts to strengthen risk controls and system safeguards across the futures marketplace. The FIA, the FIA Principal Traders Group (“FIA PTG”), and the FIA European Principal Traders Association (“FIA EPTA”) 2 have identified industry best practices with respect to risk controls that reduce the risk of market disruptions due to unauthorized access, software changes, 1 FIA is the leading trade organization for the futures, options and over-the-counter cleared derivatives markets. It is the only association representative of all organizations that have an interest in the listed derivatives markets. Its membership includes the world's largest derivatives clearing firms as well as leading derivatives exchanges from more than 20 countries. As the principal members of the derivatives clearing organizations, our member firms play a critical role in the reduction of systematic risk in the financial markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Commodities Brief This Daily Newsletter Is Available to Reuters Customers on Their Desktop Terminals Using the Code [COM/BRIEF] Or Via Email
    Compiled on Tuesday, May 11, 2010 Daily Commodities Brief This daily newsletter is available to Reuters customers on their desktop terminals using the code [COM/BRIEF] or via email. If you would like to receive it directly, please register at http://online.thomsonreuters.com/commodities%5Fpreference/ Index (Total Return) Close10May Change YTD Change Contract (AS OF 0719GMT) Price Change Net Change YTD Reuters/Jefferies CRB 261.09 1.58% -6.29% NYMEX light crude $76.23 -0.74% -$0.57 -3.23% S&P GSCI 4288.078 1.82% -5.43% NYMEX RBOB gasoline $2.17 -0.25% -$0.04 5.85% Rogers International 3076.78 -0.63% -6.04% ICE gas oil $670.25 -0.22% -$671.75 5.70% NYMEX natural gas $4.16 -0.29% -$0.01 -25.16% Dow Jones - UBS 128.6608 1.22% -6.43% Spot Gold $1,206.40 0.37% $4.50 9.69% Cont Commod Indx 466.45 0.95% -2.79% LME Copper $7,010 -1.61% -$115.00 -3.46% Other Market Performance LME Aluminium $2,115 -1.17% -$25.00 -3.72% US STOCKS (DJI) 10380.43 3.90% 3.42% CBOT Corn $3.61 -0.55% -$0.02 -12.42% US DOLLAR INDEX 84.156 -0.35% 8.09% CBOT Wheat $4.82 -0.05% $0.00 -10.90% US BOND INDEX (DJ) 255.05 -0.18% 3.41% Malaysia Palm Oil (3M) R2,510 -0.75% -R19 -5.03% CHART OF THE DAY (Click on the chart for full-size image) Join Reuters Editorial Live on 11 May to Discuss USDA Crop Report The Global Ags Forum, Thomson Reuters online chatroom for grain traders and analysts, will host a chat with columnist Gavin Maguire starting at 7:45 am CDT (1245 GMT) Tuesday 11 May after USDA issues its May crop report.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2020 Stock Market Crash Is a Global Stock Market Crash That Began on 20 February 2020
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE 2020 EVENTS IN THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY (UP TO APRIL 1ST, 2020) The 2020 stock market crash is a global stock market crash that began on 20 February 2020. On 12 February, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the NASDAQ Composite, and S&P 500 Index all finished at record highs (while the NASDAQ and S&P 500 reached subsequent record highs on 19 February). From 24 to 28 February, stock markets worldwide reported their largest one-week declines since the 2008 financial crisis, thus entering a correction. Global markets into early March became extremely volatile, with large swings occurring in global markets. On 9 March, most global markets reported severe contractions, mainly in response to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic and an oil price war between Russia and the OPEC countries led by Saudi Arabia. This became colloquially known as Black Monday I, and at the time was the worst drop since the Great Recession in 2008. Three days after Black Monday I there was another drop, Black Thursday, where stocks across Europe and North America fell more than 9%. Wall Street experienced its largest single-day percentage drop since Black Monday in 1987, and the FTSE MIB of the Borsa Italiana fell nearly 17%, becoming the worst-hit market during Black Thursday. Despite a temporary rally on 13 March (with markets posting their best day since 2008), all three Wall Street indexes fell more than 12% when markets re-opened on 16 March. At least one benchmark stock market index in all G7 countries and 14 of the G20 countries has been declared to be in bear markets.
    [Show full text]