DOCSLIB.ORG

Associated Direction No 19 Entry Into South Australia Table

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Associated Direction No 19 Entry Into South Australia Table Cross Border Travel - Associated Direction No 19 Entry into South Australia Table People who have been at a New South Wales COVID-19 Case Location • COVID-19 test on day 1, 5, & 13. People who have been at a NSW COVID-19 Case Level • Quarantine for 14 days. Location* who arrived in SA before 2pm Thursday 17 June 2021 5 • Must wear a face mask (covering mouth and nose) at any time that they come into contact with the public for a period of 14 days after their arrival in South Australia. People who have been at a NSW COVID-19 Case Location* who (including Essential Travellers and Level • Not permitted to enter South Australia SA residents) arrived in SA after 2pm Thursday 17 6 June 2021 • COVID-19 test on day 1, 5, & 13. People who are escaping Domestic Violence and Level • Quarantine for 14 days. have been at a NSW COVID-19 Case Location* arriving in SA after 2pm Thursday 17 June 2021 5 • Must wear a face mask (covering mouth and nose) at any time that they come into contact with the public for a period of 14 days after their arrival in South Australia. People who have been in the Waverley Council Area, New South Wales People who have been in the Waverley Council Area**, NSW in the 14 days before (not before 11 Level • Not permitted to enter South Australia June 2021) arriving in SA after 7.48pm Saturday 19 6 June 2021 • COVID-19 test on day 1, 5, & 13. SA Residents, People Relocating and People • Self-quarantine for 14 days. Escaping Domestic Violence who have been in Level the Waverley Council Area**, NSW in the 14 days • Must wear a face mask (covering mouth and nose) at any time that they come into before (not before 11 June 2021) arriving in SA after 4 contact with the public for a period of 14 days after their arrival in South Australia. 7.48pm Saturday 19 June 2021 • Must not enter or remain in a high risk setting in South Australia for a period of 14 days after their arrival. Essential Travellers entering South Australia from Level • Essential Travellers from Waverley Council Area have modified Level 4 restrictions. Waverley Council Area 4 Please refer to the individual Essential Traveller Table for more information. People who have been in the Randwick City, Bayside, City of Canada Bay Inner West, City of Sydney, Woollahra Municipal Council Areas, New South Wales All people (including Essential and Permitted Travellers) who have been in Randwick City, • COVID-19 test on day 1, 5, & 13. Bayside, City of Canada Bay Inner West, City of Level • Self-quarantine until undertaken the first test (do not need to wait for the result). Sydney, Woollahra Municipal Council areas*** 3 • No entry into high risk setting for 14 days after arrival, unless clause 9 applies. in the 14 days before (not before 11 June 2021) • No entry to COVID Management Plan events >1000. arriving in SA after 12.01am Tuesday 22 June 2021 *A New South Wales COVID- Case Location is defined under the Direction as a New South Wales Restricted Zone A Arrival. These people have been at New South Wales COVID-19 Case Locations who have attended a location at a date and time specified on the Government of New South alesW website: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/ covid-19/Pages/case-locations-and-alerts.aspx. (with the exception of those COVID-19 case locations whose date is the 3, 4 or 5 June 2021). This includes all close and casual contacts as specified on the Government of New South Wales website. ** The Waverley Council Area is defined under the Direction as a New South Wales Restricted Zone B Arrival. The suburbs captured in this area include; The Waverley Council area includes the suburbs of Bondi, Bondi Beach, Bondi Junction, Bronte, Dover Heights, North Bondi, Queens Park, Rose Bay, Tamarama, Vaucluse and Waverley. A map can be viewed on: https://profile.id.com.au/waverley/about?WebID=10. *** Randwick City, Bayside, City of Canada Bay Inner West, City of Sydney, Woollahra Municipal Council areas are defined under the Direction as New South Wales Restricted Zone C Arrivals. The suburbs in these areas can be found at https://www.covid-19.sa.gov.au/emergency-declarations/cross-border-travel Category 1 and 2 Essential Travellers can be found under the Direction at https://www.covid-19.sa.gov.au/emergency-declarations/cross-border-travel In effect from 12.01am 22 June 2021 This is a guide only. Go to SA.GOV.AU to view specific requirements relating to your personal circumstances. Information updated 21 June 2021.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Truck Noise Measurements Clyde Transfer Terminal August 2016
    Annual Truck Noise Measurements Clyde Transfer Terminal August 2016 Annual Truck Noise Measurements Quality Information Completed by: ……………………………………… Sara Maddison Environmental Engineer – Resource Recovery Reviewed by: ……………………………………… Stephen Bernhart Project Manager – Resource Recovery Authorised by: ……………………………………… Ramona Bachu NSW Environment Officer (Acting Environmental Management Representative) Address: Veolia Australia & New Zealand Corner Unwin and Shirley Streets, Rosehill, NSW, 2142 Date: August 2016 Reference: CTT_TRUCK_0816 Status: FINAL Revision History and Distribution List: Rev No. Details Issued to Date 0 Draft • Veolia (internal QA) August 2015 1 Final • Veolia (internal QA) September 2015 This page intentionally left blank Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 2. Noise Limit Criteria ............................................................................................................................................ 7 3. Measurement Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 8 4. Noise Measurements Results ........................................................................................................................... 9 5. Discussion ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Society of New South Wales. Report on Historical Significance
    Journal & Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, Vol. 139, p. 75–99, 2006 ISSN 0035-9173/06/020075–25 $4.00/1 The Royal Society of New South Wales Report on Historical Significance peter tyler Keywords: Royal Society of NSW, Library Collection, Community Heritage Grant THE BRIEF ture.1 The name was changed to ‘Philosophical Society of New South Wales’ in 1856, the year In November 2005 the Royal Society was that the Colony gained responsible government. awarded a Community Heritage Grant to fund In May 1866, Queen Victoria granted permis- a Significance and Preservation Survey. The sion to assume the present title ‘The Royal So- Community Heritage Grants Program is man- ciety of New South Wales’. The Society was aged by the National Library of Australia and incorporated under this name by Act of the jointly funded and supported by the Australian NSW Parliament on 16 December 1881 ‘for the Government through the Department of Com- encouragement of studies and investigations in munications, Information Technology and the Science, Art, Literature and Philosophy’. Arts, the National Library of Australia, Na- Because the Royal Society was incorporated tional Archives of Australia, the Australian under its own Act of Parliament, it can only Film Commission and the National Museum of be dissolved by legislation, unlike most corpo- Australia. rate bodies where this power is vested in the The grant is seen as a first step in support- members. Until 1935 women were not admit- ing the effort to preserve the Royal Society’s ted to the Society, although scholarly papers collection of scientific books, journals and his- by women such as by Fanny Cohen and Marie torical documents by engaging professional ex- Bentivoglio were accepted for reading or pub- pertise to guide the ongoing management and lication.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Funding Performance Monitor
    UDIA NSW | 2020 Infrastructure Funding Performance Monitor $2.7 billion is currently held as a restricted asset by Councils for the delivery of infrastructure • The current total balance of contributions held across the Greater Sydney megaregion is $2.7 billion, with the average amount held by a Council sitting at $56 million. • Every year new housing contributes almost $900 million to local infrastructure, Executive roads, stormwater, open space and community facilities across the Greater Sydney megaregion through the infrastructure charging framework. It is expected Summary that this infrastructure is built with the funds that are paid. • However, only 64% of the contributions that are paid for were spent in the last three years. Average Total Expenditure Total Income Balance E/I ($’000) ($’000) ($’000) Total 0.64 $650,679 $876,767 $2,653,316 Contributions Under a s7.11 0.85 $564,670 $711,912 $2,330,289 or s7.12 Under a s7.4 0.62 $41,640 $124,180 $259,501 The amount of unspent funding has increased over the past three years • Since FY16 total unspent contributions have increased 33% from $1.98 billion to over $2.65 billion. Executive • In the last year alone unspent contributions increased by 7.8%, or almost $191 million. Summary • Local Government must resolve local issues to ensure that infrastructure is actually provided on the ground. If necessary, the State Government should step-in to support Councils get infrastructure on the ground. Increased funding does not correlate to increased infrastructure delivery • The scatter graphs here show an extremely weak relationship between cash held and expenditure ratios.
    [Show full text]
  • Bushfires in New South Wales
    EARLIER, MORE FREQUENT, MORE DANGEROUS: BUSHFIRES IN NEW SOUTH WALES CLIMATECOUNCIL.ORG.AU Thank you for supporting the Climate Council. The Climate Council is an independent, crowd-funded organisation providing quality information on climate change to the Australian public. Published by the Climate Council of Australia Limited ISBN: 978-1-925573-36-7 (print) 978-1-925573-37-4 (web) © Climate Council of Australia Ltd 2017 This work is copyright the Climate Council of Australia Ltd. All material contained in this work is copyright the Climate Council of Australia Ltd Professor Lesley Hughes except where a third party source is indicated. Climate Councillor Climate Council of Australia Ltd copyright material is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License. To view a copy of this license visit http://creativecommons.org.au. You are free to copy, communicate and adapt the Climate Council of Australia Ltd copyright material so long as you attribute the Climate Council of Australia Ltd and the authors in the following manner: Earlier, More Frequent, More Dangerous: Bushfires in New South Wales by Professor Lesley Hughes and Dr David Alexander. Dr David Alexander Researcher, Climate Council The authors retain sole responsibility for the contents of this report. We would like to thank Martyna Kotowska and Dylan Pursche for their assistance in preparing the report. — Cover image credit: “Bushfire close up at night“ by VanderWolf Images, Shutterstock image library. This report is printed on 100% recycled paper. facebook.com/climatecouncil [email protected] twitter.com/climatecouncil climatecouncil.org.au CLIMATE COUNCIL 1 Contents Key Findings ...................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City of Canada Bay Bike Plan, East-West Bike Route
    7th December, 2020 To Whom It May Concern, RE: City of Canada Bay Bike Plan, East-west bike route Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed City of Canada Bay Bike Plan, East-west bike route. Bicycle NSW has been the peak bicycle advocacy group now in NSW for over forty-four years, and has over 30 affiliated local Bicycle User Groups. We agree with the ptc report and resident feedback that the current route via Gibbs Street and Queens Road is manifestly inadequate. Stenciling bicycles on the roadway, or on the road shoulder where cars park, will do nothing to prevent crashes or convince concerned riders to cycle. It is regrettable that Starve data was used in place of cyclist surveys. Strava is an app used by confident/ fearless riders whose focus is racing and competition. This app literally encourages riders to map the fastest travel times on particular routes, as a form of urban fitness challenge. This is not the audience Canada Bay Council is trying to encourage to ride bikes, and it is a shame that the report failed to canvas riders on the Bay Run who use the cycleway and shared user path, parents and school children. Some of the Bicycle NSW team travel through Canada bay to reach our office in Olympic Park and have direct experience of the many dangerous pinch-points along the Gibbs Street and Queens Road route, as well as better alternatives on quieter streets. We are also acutely aware of the heavy vehicles obstructing road shoulder bike lanes, and of the challenges children face trying to ride to school when crossings between footpaths are unsafe.
    [Show full text]
  • LAYING CLIO's GHOSTS on the SHORES of NEW HOLLAND* the Title Does Not Foreshadow an Ex
    EMPTY HISTORICAL BOXES OF THE EARLY DAYS: LAYING CLIO'S GHOSTS ON THE SHORES OF NEW HOLLAND* By DUNCAN ~T ACC.ALU'M HE title does not foreshadow an exhumation of the village Hampdens, as Webb T called them,! buried on the shores of Botany Bay. In fact, they were probably thieves, but let their ;-emains rest in peace. No, the metaphor in the title is from an analogy from a memorable controversy in value theory in Economics. 2 The title was meant to suggest the need for giving some historical content to the emotions that have accompanied discussions of the early period. Some of the figures which seem to have been conjured up by historical writers have been given malignancy but 110t identity. Yet these faceless men of the past, and the roles for which they have been cast, seem to distort the play of life. And indeed, it is perhaps because the historical boxes have remained unfilled, and because the background-the rest of the play and action-has not been fully explored, that some people of the early period, well known to us by name, have been interpreted in the light of twentieth-century prejudice and political controversy. We know all too little about the quality of day-to-day life in early Australia, the spiritual and material existence of the early Europeans, their energies, their activities and outlook. In the first stage of an inquiry I have been pursuing into our early social history, I am concerned not with these more elusive yet in a way more interesting questions, but in what sort of colony it was with the officers, the gaol and the port.
    [Show full text]
  • Nineteenth-Century Lunatic Asylums in South Australia and Tasmania (1830-1883)
    AUSTRALASIAN HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY, 19,2001 Convicts and the Free: Nineteenth-century lunatic asylums in South Australia and Tasmania (1830-1883) SUSAN PIDDOCK While most ofus are familiar with the idea ofthe lunatic asylum, few people realise that lunatic asylums were intended to be curative places where the insane were return to sanity. In the early nineteenth century a new treatment regime that emphasised the moral management of the insane person in the appropriate environment became popular. This environment was to be provided in the new lunatic asylums being built. This article looks at what this moral environment was and then considers it in the context ofthe provisions made for the insane in two colonies: South Australia and Tasmania. These colonies had totally different backgrounds, one as a colony offree settlers and the other as a convict colony. The continuing use ofnineteenth-century lunatic asylums as modern mental hospitals means that alternative approaches to the traditional approaches ofarchaeology have to be considered, and this article discusses documentary archaeology as one possibility. INTRODUCTION and Australia. In this paper a part of this study is highlighted, that being the provision of lunatic asylums in two colonies of While lunacy and the lunatic asylum are often the subject of Australia: South Australia and Tasmania. The first a colony academic research, little attention has been focused on the that prided itself on the lack of convicts within its society, and asylums themselves, as built environments in which the insane the second a colony which received convicts through the were to be bought back to sanity and returned to society.
    [Show full text]
  • Greening Our City Grant Guidelines March 2021
    Greening our City Grant Program Cooler Suburbs Grant Guidelines March 2021 Acknowledgement NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of the land and pays respect to all Elders past, present and future. Greening our City Grant Program Grant Guidelines March 2021 Copyright notice © State of New South Wales through Department of Planning, Industry and Environment 2021. You may copy, distribute, display, download and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose, provided that you attribute the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment as the owner. However, you must obtain permission if you wish to charge others for access to the publication (other than at cost); include the publication in advertising or a product for sale; modify the publication; or republish the publication on a website. You may freely link to the publication on a departmental website. Disclaimer The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (March 2021) and may not be accurate, current or complete. The State of New South Wales (including the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment), the author and the publisher take no responsibility, and will accept no liability, for the accuracy, currency, reliability or correctness of any information included in the document (including material provided by third parties). Readers should make their own inquiries and rely on their own advice when making decisions related to material contained
    [Show full text]
  • SA Climate Ready Climate Projections for South Australia
    South East SA Climate Ready Climate projections for South Australia This document provides a summary of rainfall The region and temperature (maximum and minimum) information for the South East (SE) Natural Resources The SE NRM region (from the Management (NRM) region generated using the northern Coorong and Tatiara districts latest group of international global climate models. to the coast in the south and west, Information in this document is based on a more and Victoria to the east) has wet, cool detailed regional projections report available winters and dry, mild-hot summers; at www.goyderinstitute.org. with increasing rainfall from north to south; coastal zones are dominated by Climate projections at a glance winter rainfall, whilst more summer rain is experienced in inland areas. The future climate of the SE NRM region will be drier and hotter, though the amount of global action on decreasing greenhouse The SA Climate Ready project gas emissions will influence the speed and severity of change. The Goyder Institute is a partnership between the South Decreases in rainfall are projected for all seasons, Australian Government through the Department of Environment, with the greatest decreases in spring. Water and Natural Resources, CSIRO, Flinders University, Average temperatures (maximum and minimum) are University of Adelaide, and the University of South Australia. projected to increase for all seasons. Slightly larger increases In 2011, the Goyder Institute commenced SA Climate Ready, in maximum temperature occur for the spring season. a project to develop climate projections for South Australia. The resulting information provides a common platform on which Government, business and the community can By the end of the 21st century develop solutions to climate change adaptation challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT ARTESIAN BASIN Responsibility to Any Person Using the Information Or Advice Contained Herein
    S O U T H A U S T R A L I A A N D N O R T H E R N T E R R I T O R Y G R E A T A R T E S I A N B A S I N ( E RNturiyNaturiyaO M A N G A B A S I N ) Pmara JutPumntaara Jutunta YuenduYmuuendumuYuelamu " " Y"uelamu Hydrogeological Map (Part " 2) Nyirri"pi " " Papunya Papunya ! Mount Liebig " Mount Liebig " " " Haasts Bluff Haasts Bluff ! " Ground Elevation & Aquifer Conditions " Groundwater Salinity & Management Zones ! ! !! GAB Wells and Springs Amoonguna ! Amoonguna " GAB Spring " ! ! ! Salinity (μ S/cm) Hermannsburg Hermannsburg ! " " ! Areyonga GAB Spring Exclusion Zone Areyonga ! Well D Spring " Wallace Rockhole Santa Teresa " Wallace Rockhole Santa Teresa " " " " Extent of Saturated Aquifer ! D 1 - 500 ! D 5001 - 7000 Extent of Confined Aquifer ! D 501 - 1000 ! D 7001 - 10000 Titjikala Titjikala " " NT GAB Management Zone ! D ! Extent of Artesian Water 1001 - 1500 D 10001 - 25000 ! D ! Land Surface Elevation (m AHD) 1501 - 2000 D 25001 - 50000 Imanpa Imanpa ! " " ! ! D 2001 - 3000 ! ! 50001 - 100000 High : 1515 ! Mutitjulu Mutitjulu ! ! D " " ! 3001 - 5000 ! ! ! Finke Finke ! ! ! " !"!!! ! Northern Territory GAB Water Control District ! ! ! Low : -15 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! FNWAP Management Zone NORTHERN TERRITORY Birdsville NORTHERN TERRITORY ! ! ! Birdsville " ! ! ! " ! ! SOUTH AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!! !!!! D !! D !!! DD ! DD ! !D ! ! DD !! D !! !D !! D !! D ! D ! D ! D ! D ! !! D ! D ! D ! D ! DDDD ! Western D !! ! ! ! ! Recharge Zone ! ! ! ! ! ! D D ! ! ! ! ! ! N N ! ! A A ! L L ! ! ! ! S S ! ! N N ! ! Western Zone E
    [Show full text]
  • European Discovery and South Australian Administration of the Northern Territory
    3 Prior to 1911: European discovery and South Australian administration of the Northern Territory The first of five time periods that will be used to structure this account of the development and deployment of vocational education and training in the Northern Territory covers the era when European explorers initially intruded upon the ancient Aboriginal tribal lands and culminates with the colony of South Australia gaining control of the jurisdiction. Great Britain took possession of the northern Australian coastline in 1824 when Captain Bremer declared this section of the continent as part of New South Wales. While there were several abortive attempts to establish settlements along the tropical north coast, the climate and isolation provided insurmountable difficulties for the would-be residents. Similarly, the arid southern portion of this territory proved to be inhospitable and difficult to settle. As part of an ongoing project of establishing the borders of the Australian colonies, the Northern Territory became physically separated from New South Wales when the Colonial Office of Great Britain gave control of the jurisdiction to the Government of the Colony of South Australia in 1863 (The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia 1974, p. 83) following the first non-Indigenous south to north crossing of the continent by the South Australian-based explorer John McDouall Stuart in the previous year. 35 VocatioNAL EducatioN ANd TRAiNiNg On the political front, in 1888 South Australia designated the Northern Territory as a single electoral district returning two members to its Legislative Assembly and gave representation in the Upper House in Adelaide. Full adult suffrage was extended by South Australia to all Northern Territory white residents in 1890 that demonstrated an explicit and purposeful disenfranchisement of the much more numerous Asian and Aboriginal populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    1 | COMMON EQUITY ANNUAL REPORT | 1 2 | COMMON EQUITY ANNUAL REPORT | 1 2 | COMMON EQUITY ANNUAL REPORT | 3 4 | COMMON EQUITY Programs Capacity building of Multicultural Senior Establishment of the Community Co-op in Guildford and Tenant Support Program Co-op for Women in Jannali Organisational Development Relocated office to new Procured an IT infrastructure central location and software upgrade Improved information management systems to support accuracy and efficiency Improved business Developed a Disaster mapping processes Recovery Plan Property Procured a new cloud-based asset Developed Improved tendering management solution for improved process for upgrade works property lifecycle planning Project Plans for the Croydon and Vietnamese Seniors underway and achieving milestones Advocacy Founding member of the Australian Co-operative Housing Alliance (ACHA) Proud partner in key research UWS Social Value of initiatives including: Co-operative Housing UTS Collaborative Housing ANNUAL REPORT | 5 5 Byron 1 Shire Council Lismore City Bellingen 7 Council Shire Council Regional Local 9 Port Stephens Government Areas Council 30 Great Lakes Council 18 Wollongong 19 City Council City of Albury Number of # properties in local government area 3 39 City of Blacktown 1 City of 61 Parramatta City of Council 1 Ryde Cumberland Council City of Canada Bay 115 90 7 42 10 City of Fairfield City Council 10 Sydney Burwood Inner Council West Waverley Council Council City of Canterbury 26 Bankstown 1 Bayside Council Georges River Council 16 23 Campbelltown Sydney
    [Show full text]