Calculcating the World W Cover.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Calculcating the World W Cover.Pdf “The little northern town of Bergen, sea-port, Ellingsen Gunnar Hornnes Rune Vollset Magnus Calculating the World The history of geophysics fishing-haven, market town, has done more for as seen from Bergen science in the last two or three generations than many – not to say most – university towns.” (Nature, July 21, 1928). Bergen, in Western Norway, is the birthplace of modern weather forecasting and of physical oceanography. It has been a center for daring polar expeditions, for NATO research and for climate modeling. In 2017, the internationally oriented Geophysical Institute celebrated its 100th anniversary. This book tells the scientific history of geophysics as seen from Bergen. Calculating the World the Calculating as seen from Bergen from as seen of geophysics history The Magnus Vollset is a historian and researcher at the University of Bergen. His research interests include transnational history and the history of meteorology. Gunnar Ellingsen is a historian, and the director of the Norwegian Fisheries Museum. His research interests include the history of oceanography and meteorology. ISBN: 978-82-450-2197-4 Rune Hornnes is a historian and researcher at the Magnus Vollset University of Bergen. He has also worked with the Rune Hornnes history of fisheries management. Gunnar Ellingsen 12121 Calculating the World Cover_02.indd 2,6 06.07.2018 14:36 Calculating the World Magnus Vollset, Rune Hornnes, Gunnar Ellingsen Calculating the World The history of geophysics as seen from Bergen Foreword Ten years ago, the (Norwegian) book I vinden was published in con- nection with the Geophysical Institute’s 90th anniversary. Historical material about the Institute has been published in other books previ- ously. For some of us, at least, it was therefore unclear whether new perspectives on our history could be written a relatively short time after 2007. However, during the work with the last book, which focused on institutional history, it became evident that the Institute has a science history that is not well known and definitely deserves to be publicized. This is what the present book, Calculating the World, sets out to do. Here, the main topics are concentrated on activities, theories, instru- ments and interaction between staff at the Geophysical Institute and other geophysical communities. When the Geophysical Institute was founded, a pioneering era in geophysics was taking place internationally. Several breakthroughs were made, including some very important ones by the small, newly established institute in Bergen that was funded mainly by private donations from local citizens. It is quite remarkable that within this institute, solutions were discovered for scientific problems that have puzzled mankind for generations. Initially, the Geophysical Institute was an independent body, and its leaders made a deliberate decision not to engage in teaching. Today, as a university department, we do conduct extensive teaching activities in meteorology, oceanography, climate dynamics, biogeochemistry and, recently, renewable energy (related to solar wind and water). Approximately 130 students are affiliated with the Institute today, dis- tributed among our various bachelor’s and master’s programs. Teach- 5 ing is vital for our development, and it is a great responsibility to be chosen by young talented people to give them an education. We believe their competence is important for society, and we will work to recruit even more students in the years to come. Compared to the pioneering era, there are additional and different overall drivers behind the development of the academic community in geophysics today. Modern technology and infrastructure drive a demand for forecasting services of a much greater variety and com- plexity than before. This presents us with a serious challenge. Even more important is that our global environment and ecological systems are approaching stress levels that can be critical due to the climate challenge, resource shortages, ocean acidification, and environmen- tal pollution, to name the most important factors. Knowledge and its applications in geophysics are central components in finding solutions to develop a more sustainable society. With increased demands, it is satisfying to observe considerable growth in the Institute’s activities over the last few decades. At present, we number approximately 120 employees from 20 nations working in various areas, and we have a productive and dynamic collaboration with the other partners in the Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research (UniRes, the Nansen Centre, and the Institute of Marine Research). This is indeed worth celebrating, and I take this opportunity to congratulate staff and students at the Geophysical Institute with the anniversary and with this book, which you are a part of. At the same time, I would like to thank the University’s Rector, Dag Rune Olsen, for the financial contribution that made it possible to make this book project a reality. Lastly, I am very grateful to the three authors, espe- cially the main author, Magnus Vollset, for their valuable, efficient, and productive collaborative efforts. Bergen, May 2018 Nils Gunnar Kvamstø Head of the Geophysical Institute Acknowledgments The occasion for writing this book is the 100th anniversary of the Geo- physical Institute in Bergen. The authors are grateful for the economic support the Institute has provided, and the exemplary access, support and patience offered by the head of the Institute, Nils Gunnar Kvam- stø. Likewise, we wish to thank the members of the book committee, who have provided valuable feedback that has greatly improved the manuscript: Peter Mosby Haugan, Peder Roberts, Svein Atle Skålevåg, and Ellen Marie Viste. We also wish to acknowledge the Department of Archaeology, History, Cultural Studies and Religion (AHKR) for hosting the project, and the research group Health, Welfare and the History of Science for feedback during the process. Throughout the project, we have been met with open arms by geo- physicists who have shared their time and expertise, when giving inter- views, answering questions over the phone and by email, commenting on drafts, and providing access to source material. We are grateful for your generous help and guidance: Lennart Bengtsson, Helge Drange, Anton Eliassen, Arne Foldvik, Gunnar Furnes, Tor Gammelsrød, Yngvar Gjessing, Sigbjørn Grønås, Eystein Jansen, Ola M. Johannes- sen, Thor Kvinge, Erland Källén, Steinar Myking, Karsten Storetvedt, Svein Sundby and Svein Østerhus. We would also like to thank those who have helped us to gain access to images: Marianne Økland Borge, Frank Cleveland, Ilker Fer, Arne Foldvik, Ola. M. Johannessen, Moss Kunstforening, Nils Gunnar Kvamstø, Algot Kristoffer Peterson, Lasse H. Pettersson, and Ola Søndenå. Finally, we wish to thank the archivists, librarians and others who have helped us to gain access to sources and literature that would other- 7 wise have been unavailable, in particular Ola Søndenå at the University of Bergen Library, who catalogued the archives from the Geophysical Institute while this project was taking place; Berit Bjørndal, who orga- nized access to the troves of documents hidden in the Institute’s attic; and Kjersti Dahle at the University’s Division of Human Resources for providing access to newer source material. We are also grateful for valuable feedback from an anonymous reviewer. Bergen, March 2018 Gunnar Ellingsen, Rune Hornnes, Magnus Vollset Contents Foreword 5 Acknowledgments 7 1 Calculating the world 11 The third in the world 15 The chapters 18 2 The first Bergen school 23 A Norwegian Challenger 25 Into the Arctic unknown 34 Going high and low with the circulation theorem 37 The Bergen school of oceanography 44 Drifting apart 53 3 Useful curiosity 55 Institutionalizing Norwegian geophysics 57 The Bergen school of meteorology 60 The salt works 70 Connecting the dots in climate variations 72 A center for collaboration 78 Seven years in the ice 81 The curious case of the “Nansen monument” 87 A geophysical capital 91 4 Moving in and moving on 93 Under the same roof 94 Helland-Hansen’s big project 96 Bjerknes reaches for the skies 103 From geomagnetism to particle physics 107 The instrument maker 113 Moving on and opening doors 118 Working together? 122 5 The ocean and atmosphere as field 125 The field in oceanography and meteorology 127 A glimpse out on the ocean – the Armauer Hansen 129 The field person 132 Observing westward and upward 136 Much ado about balloons 137 6 The oceans under surveillance 143 A new dawn 145 A new leader for a new age 148 Of ships and men 151 Oceanography internationally 155 Tools for a new age 159 Hunting submarines? 165 Guests and destinations 167 Local collaboration – or lack thereof 171 Publication practices 174 The Helland Hansen sinks 243 An oceanographic transformation 245 7 Matters of scale in meteorology and earth physics 247 A farewell to forecasting 249 Postwar expansion of weather forecasting 252 Turning to the local 257 Let the machine do the calculations? 264 A matter of prestige 267 Introducing geological time 271 8 New ways of organizing geophysical research 279 Interdisciplinary collaboration and contract research 281 Economic realities versus economistic ideologies 283 A call for useful research 289 How to achieve “further progress” in ocean studies 291 A new site for geophysical knowledge production 293 Chasing external funding 300 The Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research 302 Adding events and sites 306 9 Geophysics in the age of climate change 309 Global warming becomes a matter of concern 310 Entering the niche of interdisciplinary climate research 313 Building and coupling models 318 Reaching up, reaching out 320 Can CO2 be drowned in the sea? 322 Where to locate offshore windmills 327 Remaining on top? 330 A crisis of credibility? 331 10 Reflections 335 The Bergen school remembering itself 337 Striking continuities 345 Nature is also acting 350 Motivations and publications 352 Making the invisible visible 354 Appendix 357 Bibliography 358 Notes 379 Index 412 1 Calculating the world The North Sea, July 9th, 1922: the research vessel Armauer Hansen is almost back in Bergen, a city on the west coast of Norway, after two and half months at sea.
Recommended publications
  • April 2021 Volume 46 No
    mars og april 2021 Volume 46 No. 2 Fosselyngen Lodge No. 5-082, Sons of Norway PO Box 20957, Milwaukee, WI 53220 FOSSELYNGEN LODGE – CALENDAR OF EVENTS For each of the following Zoom meetings, an email with the Zoom invitation will be sent approximately three days before the meeting. If you do not receive an invitation and want to join us, please contact Sue at 414-526-8312 or [email protected] . MARCH 8 Monday Virtual Lodge Social Meeting & Program for All Members via Zoom @ 7PM. Program: “Coming Home”: Documentary Video About Kayaking on Fjords In Norway We will see the 25 minute documentary, “Coming Home”, by adventurer-author- speaker David Ellingson, about his one month kayak adventure on the Sogne and Hardanger Fjords in Norway. David will join our Zoom meeting to answer our questions. David will also talk about his book, “Paddle Pilgrim: Kayaking the Fjords of Norway.” APRIL 12 Monday Virtual Lodge Social Meeting & Program for All Members via Zoom @ 7PM. Program: Presentation via Zoom by Timothy Boyce About Odd Nansen’s . Secret Diary Written in a World War II Concentration Camp See a more detailed description of the program on Page 3. MAY 10 Monday Virtual Lodge Meeting for All Members via Zoom @ 7PM. Put on your calendar. See May/June 2021 Runespeak for details. Contents of This Issue: Pg. 1: Calendar of Events; Table of Contents Pg. 2: President’s Report; Officers Pg. 3: April 12th Program by Timothy Boyce RE: Odd Nansen; Story of Nina Hasvoll; Mr. Boyce’s Blog Pg. 4: Sympathy; King Harold’s 84th Birthday; 7 Nordic-Inspired Ways to Celebrate Spring Pg.
    [Show full text]
  • 404064-Rosten Nr4 2020.Pdf
    August 2020 // Nr. 4 // 76. årgang For jeg vet de tanker jeg tenker om dere, sier Herren. Det er fredstanker, og ikke tanker til ulykke. Jeg vil gi dere fremtid og håp. Jer.29,11 UTGITT AV INDREMISJONSFORBUNDET SØR – MED GUDS ORD TIL FOLKET » Kontakt » Leder KJENNER DU BUSKAPEN DIN? Med Guds Ord til folket I ordspråkene 27, 23 kan vi lese: på årsaken til at de er borte, men som leiter fordi de er savnet, og som Indremisjons forbundet Sør Du bør vite nøye hvordan sauene Postadresse: Pb. 166, 4524 Lindesnes leder dem til Jesus. Besøksadresse: Spangreidveien 366, dine ser ut. Ha omsorg for din 4520 Lindesnes buskap! Denne våren har vært spesiell med Tlf. 38 25 83 80 lengre perioder med fravær av møter. Jesus brukte ofte sauen som bilde på E-post: [email protected] Kanskje er det for en tid som denne, Giro nr.: 3138.25.32573 oss mennesker i møte med hyrden Vippsnr.: 110518 Jesus kaller oss til å være hyrder som Jesus. I Joh. 10 sier han blant annet: leiter. Leite etter de som ikke dukker Kretsstyre: Arild Fjeldskår, Jeg er den gode hyrde. Den gode opp når møtene settes i gang igjen. Marilyn Sørensen, Wenche Slimestad, hyrde setter sitt liv til for fårene. Øystein Persson, Arne Arnesen, Andre Som ikke bare opplever at vi sit- Heradstveit, Terje Kvinlog og Jonny Og i Lukas 15,4 møter vi hyrden som Stensland (vara) ter stille og savner dem, men der vi har 100 sauer og mister en av dem:… våger å gå – ta en telefon – invitere – Konfirmasjon: «vil han da ikke forlate de nittini i Ingunn Holm tlf.
    [Show full text]
  • Masarykova Univerzita Filozofická Fakulta Brno 2013
    Masarykova univerzita Filozofická fakulta Ústav germanistiky, nordistiky a nederlandistiky Eva Dohnálková Nansenhjelpens historie og aktiviteter. En norsk humanitær organisasjon i tsjekkisk perspektiv. Magisterská diplomová práce Vedoucí práce: doc. PhDr. Miluše Juříčková, CSc. Brno 2013 Prohlašuji, že jsem diplomovou práci vypracovala samostatně s využitím uvedených pramenů a literatury. …………………………………………….. Podpis autora práce 2 Innholdsliste 1 Innledning.............................................................................................................................4 1.1 Oppgavens utgangspunkt og problemstilling.....................................................................4 1.2 Avgrensning av oppgaven..................................................................................................5 1.3 Oppgavens oppbygging.....................................................................................................5 1.4 Kilder.................................................................................................................................6 2 Jøder i Norge........................................................................................................................7 2.1 Fra vikingtiden til året 1899...............................................................................................7 2.2 Fra 1900 til 1939 ...............................................................................................................9 2.2.1 Det jødiske barnehjemmet............................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Nordlit 29, 2012 NORSK-RUSSISKE VITENSKAPELIGE RELASJONER
    NORSK-RUSSISKE VITENSKAPELIGE RELASJONER INNEN ARKTISK FORSKNING 1814-1914 Kari Aga Myklebost Vitenskapshistorikere har pekt på at de femti årene forut for 1. verdenskrig, som ofte betegnes som nasjonalismens epoke, hadde sterke internasjonale trender.1 Det foregikk internasjonaliseringsprosesser innenfor et bredt spekter av samfunnssektorer, som industri, handel, finans, politikk og demografi. Denne utviklinga hadde nær sammenheng med de tekniske nyvinningene innenfor transport og kommunikasjoner, som førte til økte muligheter for samkvem over landegrenser og bredere bevissthet om endringer i andre land. Internasjonaliseringa innenfor vitenskapen var i tillegg nært knyttet til profesjonaliseringa og institusjonaliseringa av forskningssektoren i andre halvdel av 1800-tallet. Dette foregikk som parallelle prosesser i en rekke land. Vitenskapen var en sektor i ekspansjon, både kvantitativt, kvalitativt og organisatorisk, - og samtidig en sektor som levde i spennet mellom nasjonalisering og internasjonalisering. Nasjonaliseringsprosessene innenfor polarforskninga kjenner vi godt; det handlet om fronting av nasjonalstatens interesser og status gjennom vitenskapelige oppdagelser og nyvinninger. Prosessene i retning av internasjonalisering hadde en todelt bakgrunn: For det første var de basert på tradisjonene fra 1600- og 1700-tallets Republic of Letters eller de lærdes republikk på tvers av landegrenser, hvor latin og etter hvert også tysk sto sterkt som felles akademisk arbeidsspråk. For det andre hadde de opphav i en erkjennelse av at de profesjonaliserte, nye vitenskapsdisiplinene var avhengige av internasjonal koordinering, kommunikasjon og samarbeid for å oppnå gode forskningsresultater. Det har også blitt pekt på et økende behov for å sikre kognitiv homogenitet, eller felles begreps- og forståelsesrammer, etter hvert som antallet forskningsdisipliner og forskere økte i ulike land.2 I tiårene fra ca 1860 og fram mot 1914 ble det etablert en rekke internasjonale vitenskapelige møteplasser i form av kongresser og organisasjoner.
    [Show full text]
  • Locked in Ice: Parts
    Locked in A spellbinding biography of Fridtjof Nansen, the Ice pioneer of polar exploration, with a spotlight on his harrowing three-year journey to the top of the world. An explorer who many adventurers argue ranks alongside polar celebrity Ernest Shackleton, Fridtjof Nansen contributed tremendous amounts of new Nansen’s Daring Quest information to our knowledge about the Polar Arctic. At North Pole a time when the North Pole was still undiscovered for the territory, he attempted the journey in a way that most experts thought was mad: Nansen purposefully locked his PETER LOURIE ship in ice for two years in order to float northward along the currents. Richly illustrated with historic photographs, -1— —-1 Christy Ottaviano Books 0— this riveting account of Nansen's Arctic expedition —0 Henry Holt and Company +1— celebrates the legacy of an extraordinary adventurer who NEW YORK —+1 pushed the boundaries of human exploration to further science into the twentieth century. 3P_EMS_207-74305_ch01_0P.indd 2-3 10/15/18 1:01 PM There are many people I’d like to thank for help researching and writing this book. First, a special thank- you to Larry Rosler and Geoff Carroll, longtime friends and wise counselors. Also a big thank- you to the following: Anne Melgård, Guro Tangvald, and Jens Petter Kollhøj at the National Library of Norway in Oslo; Harald Dag Jølle of the Norwegian Polar Institute, in Tromsø; Karen Blaauw Helle, emeritus professor of physiology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Carl Emil Vogt, University of Oslo and the Center for Studies of Holocaust and Religious Minorities; Susan Barr, se nior polar adviser, Riksantikvaren/Directorate for Cultural Heritage; Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary Pollicy Report 1 2010
    Monetary Policy Report 1 10 March Reports from the Central Bank of Norway No. 1/2010 Monetary Policy Report 1/2010 Norges Bank Oslo 2010 Address: Bankplassen 2 Postal address: Postboks 1179 Sentrum, 0107 Oslo, Norway Phone: +47 22 31 60 00 Fax: +47 22 41 31 05 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.norges-bank.no Governor: Svein Gjedrem Deputy Governor: Jan F. Qvigstad Editor: Svein Gjedrem Cover and design: Burson-Marsteller Printing: 07 Lobo Media AS The text is set in 10½ point. Times New Roman / 9½ point Univers ISSN 1504-8470 (print) ISSN 1504-8497 (online) Monetary Policy Report The Report is published three times a year, in March, June and October/November. The Report assesses the inte- rest rate outlook and includes projections for developments in the Norwegian economy and analyses of selected themes. At its meeting on 3 December, the Executive Board discussed relevant themes for the Report. At the Executive Board meeting on 11 March, the economic outlook was discussed. On the basis of this discussion and a recom- mendation from Norges Bank’s management, the Executive Board adopted a monetary policy strategy for the pe- riod to the publication of the next Report on 23 June 2010 at the meeting held on 24 March. The Executive Board’s summary of the economic outlook and the monetary policy strategy is presented in Section 1. In the period to the next Report, the Executive Board’s monetary policy meetings will be held on 5 May and 23 June. 4 Table of contents Editorial 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Vedtekter for SFO I Lindesnes Kommune Gjeldende Fra 01.08.2020
    Lokal forskrift Vedtekter for SFO i Lindesnes kommune Gjeldende fra 01.08.2020 Vedtektene er hjemlet i § 13-7 i opplæringsloven, og ble fastsatt av formannskapet 26.03.20 § 1 Eierforhold. Lindesnes kommune driver skolefritidsordning i tilknytning til alle kommunens barneskoler: Nyplass, Spangereid, Furulunden, Ime, Frøysland, Holum, Øyslebø, Laudal og Bjelland. I tillegg drifter kommunen skolefritidsordning via barnehagen på Vigmostad for elever ved friskolen på Vigmostad. Skolefritidsordningen drives etter gjeldende lovverk og retningslinjer vedtatt av kommunestyret i Lindesnes. § 2 Målsetning Skolefritidsordningen skal gi barna omsorg og tilsyn, og legge til rette for at barna får innflytelse over egen hverdag. Det skal legges til rette for lek og kultur- og fritidsaktiviteter med utgangspunkt i alder, funksjonsnivå og interesser hos barna. § 3 Styring og ledelse - SFO er administrativt underlagt skolen. På Vigmostad er SFO i barnehagen administrativt underlagt Nyplass skole. - Rektor har overordnet pedagogisk og administrativt ansvar. - SFO skal ha en egen daglig leder med pedagogisk utdanning. SFO-leder er delegert pedagogisk-, personal- og økonomisk ansvar for den daglige driften. - Det velges foreldrekontakt for SFO. - Daglig leder og foreldrerepresentant har møte- og uttalerett i skolens samarbeidsutvalg når saker angående SFO behandles. § 4 Opptak. - Lindesnes kommune, ved den enkelte SFO, er opptaksmyndighet. Tildeling av plass, avslag på søknad om plass og oppsigelse av plass i SFO er enkeltvedtak etter forvaltningsloven. Ved enkeltvedtak som gjelder SFO er kommunens klagenemd klageinstans. - SFO ved den enkelte barneskole gir tilbud til barn fra 1-4.trinn. - Kommunens SFO-tilbud til barn med særskilte behov på 5.-7.trinn er lokalisert på Furulunden skole. For elever der foreldre har valgt bort tilbudt skoleplass på Furulunden Pluss, til fordel for nærskolen, åpnes det for at det kan gjøres unntak fra hovedregelen om SFO-tilbud ved Furulunden skole.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport Innbyggerundersøkelse Om Fremtidig Kommunestruktur
    Rapport Innbyggerundersøkelse om fremtidig kommunestruktur Lindesnes kommune Mai 2015 www.momentanalyse.no Innledning Hensikten med undersøkelsen er å avdekke innbyggernes syn på fremtidig kommunestruktur. Spørrerammen som danner grunnlag for undersøkelsen er utarbeidet i et samarbeid mellom kommunereformutvalget og rådmann i Lindesnes kommune og Moment Analyse. Undersøkelsen er gjennomført telefonisk mot et tilfeldig utvalg av innbyggerne 18 år og eldre i Lindesnes kommune. Intervjuene er gjennomført 26. og 27. mai. 18 år + 501 innbyggere er intervjuet. Dataene er vektet for kjønn og alder. Statistiske feilmarginer for undersøkelsen på totalnivå er omkring pluss/minus 1,9 – 4,5 %, noe høyere for undergruppene i undersøkelsen. Kristiansand 29.05.2015 Moment Analyse AS 501 respondenter Christian Dversnes Daglig leder s. 02 Hovedfunn Klart flertall for kommunesammenslåing 62% av innbyggerne i kommunen som er 18 år eller eldre er for en • kommunesammenslåing. 22% er mot(0-alternativet) en sammenslåing. 16% har ingen bestemt mening om de er for eller mot en kommunesammenslåing. Både Lyngdal 4 og Nye Lindesnes har stor oppslutning, men Lyngdal 4 er det mest foretrukne alternativet 55% av innbyggerne i kommunen som er 18 år eller eldre foretrekker Lyngdal 4 som • fremtidig kommunestruktur. 37% av innbyggerne foretrekker Nye Lindesnes. 9% har ingen bestemt mening om de foretrekker Lyngdal 4 eller Nye Lindesnes. s. 03 Er du for eller mot en kommunesammenslåing av Lindesnes kommune med en eller flere kommuner? 80 • Flertallet, 62%, er for kommunesammenslåing. 22% av innbyggerne er mot. 70 • 62 De resterende (16%) har ingen bestemt mening. 60 • • Andelen menn som er for er 8 prosentpoeng høyere enn kvinner. 50 40 30 12% 22 20% 20 16 22% 66% 58% 22% 10 0 For Mot Vet ikke Mann Kvinne s.
    [Show full text]
  • Enslige Asylbarn Og Historiens Tvetydighet1
    Barn nr. 3-4 2007:41–58, ISSN 0800–1669 © 2007 Norsk senter for barneforskning Enslige asylbarn og historiens tvetydighet1 Ketil Eide Sammendrag Denne artikkelen aktualiserer hvilke samfunnsmessige og omsorgspolitiske dilemmaer som oppstår i det norske samfunnet når det ankommer barn som er uten sine foreldres nære om- sorg og beskyttelse – barn som har en annerledes kulturell og etnisk bakgrunn, og som er flyktninger fra samfunn preget av væpnede konflikter eller annen organisert vold. Artikkelen fokuserer på hvordan samfunnet har oppfattet disse barnas situasjon på ulike tidspunkt og under ulike historiske omstendigheter, og hvilken praksis som har blitt utøvet når det gjelder mottak og omsorg. Den aktuelle historiske perioden er fra 1938 og fram mot år 2000. Utval- get består av fire grupper av flyktningbarn som kom til Norge uten sine foreldre.2 Disse fire utvalgene er jødiske barn som ankom 1938–39, ungarske barn som kom i 1956, tibetanske barn som kom i 1964, og enslige mindreårige flyktninger med ulik etnisk bakgrunn som kom i perioden 1989–92.3 1 Denne artikkelen bygger på avhandlingen: Tvetydige barn. Om barnemigranter i et historisk komparativt perspektiv. Universitetet i Bergen/IMER (Eide 2005). 2 Datamaterialet består av historiske dokumenter og 34 intervjuer med representanter fra de fire utvalgene, i tillegg til 19 intervjuer av hjelpere og beslutningstakere. Intervjuene er fore- tatt i perioden 1999–2002. De ulike utvalgene er ikke kronologisk framstilt i denne artikke- len, og de er også ulikt vektlagt i framstillingen. Dette er bevisst gjort uti fra hvilken tematikk som artikkelen aktualiserer. For mer detaljer om de fire utvalgene og metodisk tilnærming vises til avhandling (Eide 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • About Odd Nansen
    Odd Nansen and His The writings of Odd Nansen, June 1945: Odd nansen is reunited with his family son of Norway’s beloved statesman, after WWII. chronicle an important chapter in WWII history. By Timothy J. Boyce ost Norwegian-Americans know of Fridtjof Nansen—polar explorer, statesman and M humanitarian. His memory and achievements are widely celebrated in Norway, as attested by the October 2011 sesquicentennial celebration of his birth. But far fewer in America know about the remarkable y L life and achievements of his son, Odd Nansen, and in i M FA s particular his World War II diary, “From Day to Day.” ’ Odd Nansen, the fourth of five children of Fridtjof NANSEN and Eva Nansen, was born in 1901. He received a f ODD f O degree in architecture from the Norwegian Institute of esy rt u Technology (NTH), and from 1927 to 1930 lived and O PH c PH a worked in New York City. His father’s failing health R g brought Odd back to Norway, and after Fridtjof’s death PHOTO in May 1930 Nansen decided to remain. Following in 16 Viking May 2013 sonsofnorway.com sonsofnorway.com Viking May 2013 17 Nansen never intended to publish the diary, Fridtjof’s humanitarian secret diary, recording his From Day to Day Norwegians arrested during His entries also reveal but wrote it simply as a way to communicate with footsteps, Odd Nansen experiences, hopes, dreams The diary, later published the war, almost 7,500 were the quiet strength, and his wife Kari, and as a means of sorting out his helped establish and fears.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Place Names in Northern East Greenland
    Catalogue of place names in northern East Greenland In this section all officially approved, and many Greenlandic names are spelt according to the unapproved, names are listed, together with explana- modern Greenland orthography (spelling reform tions where known. Approved names are listed in 1973), with cross-references from the old-style normal type or bold type, whereas unapproved spelling still to be found on many published maps. names are always given in italics. Names of ships are Prospectors place names used only in confidential given in small CAPITALS. Individual name entries are company reports are not found in this volume. In listed in Danish alphabetical order, such that names general, only selected unapproved names introduced beginning with the Danish letters Æ, Ø and Å come by scientific or climbing expeditions are included. after Z. This means that Danish names beginning Incomplete documentation of climbing activities with Å or Aa (e.g. Aage Bertelsen Gletscher, Aage de by expeditions claiming ‘first ascents’ on Milne Land Lemos Dal, Åkerblom Ø, Ålborg Fjord etc) are found and in nunatak regions such as Dronning Louise towards the end of this catalogue. Å replaced aa in Land, has led to a decision to exclude them. Many Danish spelling for most purposes in 1948, but aa is recent expeditions to Dronning Louise Land, and commonly retained in personal names, and is option- other nunatak areas, have gained access to their al in some Danish town names (e.g. Ålborg or Aalborg region of interest using Twin Otter aircraft, such that are both correct). However, Greenlandic names be - the remaining ‘climb’ to the summits of some peaks ginning with aa following the spelling reform dating may be as little as a few hundred metres; this raises from 1973 (a long vowel sound rather than short) are the question of what constitutes an ‘ascent’? treated as two consecutive ‘a’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles in Newspapers and Journals and Made Lecture Tours All Over Scan- Dinavia and Germany, Contributing to Enhance the Public Educational Level and Awareness
    CMYK RGB Hist. Geo Space Sci., 3, 53–72, 2012 History of www.hist-geo-space-sci.net/3/53/2012/ Geo- and Space doi:10.5194/hgss-3-53-2012 © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Access Open Sciences Advances in Science & Research Sophus Peter Tromholt: an outstanding pioneerOpen inAccess Proceedings auroral research Drinking Water Drinking Water K. Moss1 and P. Stauning2 Engineering and Science Engineering and Science 1Guldborgvej 15, st.tv., 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Open Access Access Open Discussions 2Danish Meteorological Institute (emeritus), Lyngbyvej 100, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Correspondence to: K. Moss ([email protected]) Discussions Earth System Earth System Received: 14 November 2011 – Revised: 12 February 2012 – Accepted: 18 February 2012 – Published: 7 March 2012 Science Science Abstract. The Danish school teacher Sophus Peter Tromholt (1851–1896) was self-taught in physics, astron- Open Access Open omy, and auroral sciences. Still, he was one of the brightest auroral researchers of the 19th century.Access Open Data He was the Data first scientist ever to organize and analyse correlated auroral observations over a wide area (entire Scandinavia) moving away from incomplete localized observations. Tromholt documented the relation between auroras and Discussions sunspots and demonstrated the daily, seasonal and solar cycle-related variations in high-latitude auroral oc- currence frequencies. Thus, Tromholt was the first ever to deduce from auroral observations theSocial variations Social associated with what is now known as the auroral oval termed so by Khorosheva (1962) and Feldstein (1963) Open Access Open Geography more than 80 yr later. He made reliable and accurate estimates of the heights of auroras several decadesAccess Open Geography before this important issue was finally settled through Størmer’s brilliant photographic technique.
    [Show full text]