Gender Profile of Voters That Participated in the Elections

Local General Elections 2019 GENDER PERSPECTIVE List of abbreviations

PSRM Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova BE ACUM Electoral Bloc „ACUM Platforma DA și PAS” PDM Democratic Party of Moldova PPȘ Political Party "Șor" PCRM Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova PLDM Liberal Democratic Party of Moldova PN Political Party "Partidul Nostru" PL Liberal Party PUN Political Party "Partidul Unității Naționale" USB Political Party "Uniunea Salvați Basarabia" PPEM Political Party "Partidul Popular European din Moldova" CEC Central Electoral Commission PVP Political Party "Voința Poporului" CCET Center for Continuous Electoral Training PNL National Liberal Party DEC II District Electoral Council (second level) PVE Political Party "Partidul Verde Ecologist" DEC I District Electoral Council (first level) PPR Political Party "Partidul Popular Românesc" PEB Precinct Electoral Bureau PDA Political Party "Democraţia Acasă" PAD Democratic Action Party MSP FN Socio-political Movement "Forța Nouă" PPRM Political Party "Partidul Popular din Republica Moldova" PMPA Political Party "Mişcarea Populară Antimafie" MSP SN Professionals' Movement "Speranţa-Надежда" POM Political Party "Partidul Oamenilor Muncii" PSE Political Party "Partidul Stînga Europeană" PPM Political Party "Patrioţii Moldovei" PRSM Political Party "Partidul Ruso-Slavean din Moldova" PLD Party of Law and Justice PSM Socialist Party of Moldova 1. Electoral management

1.1 Structure of the Central Electoral Commission 1.2 Structure of electoral management bodies

Men 38.3%

DEC II 9 16.2% 61.7%

Women PEB

0 12.8% 83.8%

DEC I Women 87.2%

Men 1. Electoral management

2015 2019 Chairperson

Deputy Chairperson CEC Secretary

Members

Chairperson 29% 71% 41% 59%

Deputy Chairperson 46% 54% 53% 47% DEC II Secretary 83% 17% 79% 21%

Members 52% 48% 63% 37%

Chairperson 79% 21% 86% 14%

Deputy Chairperson 81% 19% 83% 17% DEC I Secretary 97% 3% 98% 2%

Members 85% 15% 86% 14%

Chairperson 80% 20% 85% 15%

Deputy Chairperson 78% 22% 82% 18% PEB Secretary 96% 4% 97% 3%

Members 80% 20% 82% 18%

Women Men Women Men 2. Training of electoral officials

2.1. Trained electoral officials (total)

87.1% 12.9%

5 606 831 Women Men

Total 6 437

2.2. DEC II electoral officials trained 2.3. DEC II electoral officials trained

62% 38% 89% 11% 202 124 1 903 235

Total 326 Total 2 138

2.4. PEB electoral officials trained 2.5. PEB operators trained

88.1% 11.9% 74.1% 25.9% 3 501 472 2 286 799

Total 3 973 Total 3 085 2. Training of electoral officials

2.6. Comparative analysis of trained electoral officials

2015 Local General Elections 2019 Local General Elections

46% 54% 62% 38% DEC II

85% 15% 89% 11% DEC I

87% 13% 88% 12% PEB

Women Men 3. Election observation

Women Men

3.1. National observers accredited by the CEC 3.2. National observers accredited by the CEC

55.8% 44.2% 35.9 % 64.1% 927 734 52 93 Total 1 661 Total 145

3.3. Share of women among accredited observers

National observers 1 180 2 315 3 399 3 389 1 661 International observers 544 139 636 776 145

Total 1 724 2 454 4 035 4 165 1 806

2 029 1 614 1 413 927 453

348 National observers 190 262 38 52 Women International observers

Parliamentary Local Presidential Parliamentary Local 2014 General 2016 2019 General 2015 2019 4. Electoral competitors

4.1. Electoral competitors

Candidates for Mayor Candidates for Local Council Candidates for District / Total Municipal Council candidates

189 567 4 049 5 082 458 651 PSRM 10 996 Total: 756 Total: 9 131 Total: 1 109

191 490 3 653 4 648 410 583 9 975 ACUM Total: 681 Total: 8 301 Total: 993

176 470 3 822 4 326 460 624 9 878 PDM Total: 646 Total: 8 148 Total: 1 084

205 270 2 611 2 184 416 424 6 110 PPȘ Total: 475 Total: 4 795 Total: 840

34 161 1 360 1 572 297 427 3 851 PCRM Total: 195 Total: 2 932 Total: 724

44 172 1 257 1 539 275 379 3 666 PLDM Total: 216 Total: 2 796 Total: 654

41 109 942 1 116 283 372 2 863 PN Total: 150 Total: 2 058 Total: 655

Women Men 4. Electoral competitors

4.1. Electoral competitors (continued)

Candidates for District / Total Candidates for Mayor Candidates for Local Council Municipal Council candidates

19 57 450 495 207 216 1 444 Total: 76 Total: 945 Total: 423 PL

7 48 304 393 118 173 1 043 Total: 55 Total: 697 Total: 291 PUN

8 32 232 289 94 114 769 USB Total: 40 Total: 521 Total: 208

7 15 165 190 72 84 533 PPEM Total: 22 Total: 355 Total: 156

3 20 151 174 71 87 506 PVP Total: 23 Total: 325 Total: 158

3 11 86 93 75 73 341 Total: 14 Total: 179 Total: 148 PNL

4 12 106 107 56 46 331 Total: 16 Total: 213 Total: 102 PVE

Women Men 4. Electoral competitors

4.1. Electoral competitors (continued)

Total Candidates for Mayor Candidates for Local Council Candidates for District / Municipal Council candidates

1 15 79 110 49 62 316 PPR Total: 16 Total: 189 Total: 111

2 9 58 71 45 61 PDA Total: 11 Total: 129 Total: 106 246

8 91 69 11 15 194 PAD Total: 8 Total: 160 Total: 26

2 7 37 44 22 32 144 MSP FN Total: 9 Total: 81 Total: 54

5 22 28 8 8 71 PPRM Total: 5 Total: 50 Total: 16

2 15 26 7 12 62 Total: 2 Total: 41 Total: 19 PMPA

2 8 10 11 15 46 Total: 2 Total: 18 Total: 26 MSP SN

Women Men 4. Electoral competitors

4.1. Electoral competitors (continued) Women Men

Candidates for Mayor Candidates for Local Council Candidates for District / Total Municipal Council candidates

1 2 11 14 8 10 46 POM Total: 3 Total: 25 Total: 18

3 5 3 14 17 42 PSE Total: 3 Total: 8 Total: 31

19 22 41 PPM Total: 41

2 14 19 35 PRSM Total: 2 Total: 33

1 4 6 9 11 31 PLD Total: 1 Total: 10 Total: 20

1 1 8 12 22 PSM Total: 2 Total: 20

Independent 81 251 158 735 14 111 1 350 candidates Total: 332 Total: 893 Total: 125

1 019 2 742 19 709 23 365 3 498 4 619 Total: Total: 3 761 Total: 43 074 Total: 8 117 54 952 4. Electoral competitors

4.2. Candidates for Mayor

17.3% 1. Chișinău mun. 22 105 Total: 127 14.3% 2. Bălți mun. 3 18 Total: 21 26% 3. ATU Găgăuzia 25 71 Total: 96 38.2% 4. Anenii Noi 42 68 Total: 110 20.7% 5. Basarabeasca 6 23 Total: 29 24.5% 6. Briceni 25 77 Total: 102 32,6% 7. Cahul 43 89 Total: 132 24.8% 27.1% 1 019 8. Călărași 25 76 Total: 101 26.8% 9. Cantemir 30 82 Total: 112 Total 27.6% 3 761 10. Căușeni 34 89 Total: 123 72.9% 28% 2 742 11. Cimișlia 23 59 Total: 82 29.8% 12. Criuleni 31 73 Total: 104 22.7% 13. Dondușeni 17 58 Total: 75 24% 14. Drochia 31 98 Total: 129 19% Women Men 15. Dubăsari 8 34 Total: 42 35.9% 16. Edineț 46 82 Total: 128 35.3% 17. Fălești 54 99 Total: 153 28.7% 18. Florești 49 122 Total: 171 4. Electoral competitors

4.2. Candidates for Mayor (continued)

24.2% 19. Glodeni 23 72 Total: 95 19.3% 20. Hîncești 29 121 Total: 150 20.4% 21. Ialoveni 23 90 Total: 113 31.7% 22. Leova 26 56 Total: 82 16.2% 23. Nisporeni 12 62 Total: 74 27.1% 24. Ocnița 23 62 Total: 85 28.6% 25. Orhei 56 140 Total: 196 27.1% 26. Rezina 29 78 Total: 107 30.5% 27. Rîșcani 40 91 Total: 131 33.9% 28. Sîngerei 43 105 Total: 127 29.8% Women candidates: 29. Șoldănești 25 59 Total: 84 27.1% < 20% 30. Soroca 42 113 Total: 155 20% 31. Ștefan Vodă 19 76 Total: 95 20% - 25% 25.7% 32. Strășeni 27 78 Total: 105 25% - 30% 28.3% 33. Taraclia 15 38 Total: 53 28.3% 30% - 35% 34. Telenești 32 81 Total: 113 25.8% > 35% 35. Ungheni 41 118 Total: 159 5. Participation in elections (first round)

5.1. Gender profile of voters that participated in the elections

Turnout 41.68% 1 173 834 43.1637 % 625 total on the lists 54.3% 47.7% 637 625 1 478 778 637 625 536 209 40.5% total on the lists 536 209 1 324 520

5.2. Gender profile of voters aged 18

Turnout 37.4% 11 902 39.3% total on the lists 51.2% 48.8% 6 092 15 502 6 092 5 810 35.7% total on the lists 5 810 16 280

Women Men 5. Participation in elections (first round)

5.3. Gender profile of voters that participated in the elections (by gender and age)

included on the lists

313 659 935 396 714 543 637 845 201 855

51.4% 55.4%

Women 62.6% 63.1% 51% 53.2%

41.3% 44.6% 61.1% 37.4%

25.8% 48.6% 49% 29.1% 46.8% Men 18 - 25 26 - 40 41 - 55 56 - 70 71+ years years years years

6.9% 23.2% 25.2% 34.3% 10.5%

% share of group out of the total voters that participated in the elections 1 173 834 5. Participation in elections (first round)

5.4. Youth voter turnout (aged 18 - 35)

included on the lists

203 975 33 011 45 565 209 728 303 860 151 486

52% 52.9% 53.7%

28.8% 52.6%

55.3% 28.3 % Women 50.9%

48% 23.8 % 26.5% 46.3% 47.1% 47.4% 29.1% 25.1% 44.7% 49.1%

Chișinău Bălți ATU North Center South Men mun. mun. Găgăuzia 20.9% 3.2% 5.1% 23% 33.9% 13.9% % share of group out of the total voters that participated in the elections 258 728 5. Participation in elections (first round)

5.5. Voter turnout in the Chișinău municipality

included on the lists

135 733 91 868 72 029 96 320 117 299 121 066

56% 58% 56.3% 55.6% 56.8% 52.7% Women 44% 33% 36.7%

44.4% 36% 43.2% 47.3%

42% 34.5% 43.7% 42.2% 34.2%

Men Botanica Buiucani Center Ciocana Rîșcani Suburbs 20.2% 13.8% 11.5% 13.8% 18.4% 22.2% % share of group out of the total voters that participated in the elections

229 668 5. Participation in elections (first round)

5.6. Participation in the elections Urban vs rural

47.7% 397 917 43.7% 347 764

Rural Total on the lists: Total on the lists: 833 516 796 702

188 445 37.1% 239 708 35.7%

Urban

Total on the lists: Total on the lists: 645 262 527 818

Women Men 5. Participation in elections (first round)

5.7. Participation in the elections

Voter Women Men turnout 36.2% total on the lists 36.2% total on the lists 1. Chișinău mun. 36.2% 128 117 353 608 101 520 280 707 37.7% 34.4% 2. Bălți mun. 36.2% 21 611 57 309 15 757 45 830 46.6% 43.7% 3. ATU Găgăuzia 45.2% 31 848 68 394 27 351 62 659 42.9% 40.1% 4. Anenii Noi 41.6% 1536.2% 342 35 737 13 367 33 317 38.6% 36.6% 5. Basarabeasca 37.6% 4 743 12 288 4 195 11 453 45.5% 42.7% 6. Briceni 44.2% 14 550 31 960 12 352 28 951 41.1% 37.4% 7. Cahul 39.4% 21 316 51.825 17 478 46 688 39.4% 39.4% 8. Călărași 39.4% 12 363 31 381 11 808 29 984 38.3% 36,7% 9. Cantemir 37.5% 9 528 24 900 9 050 24 652 45% 39.8% 10. Căușeni 42.5% 16 602 36 892 14 124 35 466 38.8% 40% 11. Cimișlia 39.4% 9 982 25 705 9 670 24 147 50.2% 46.6% 12. Criuleni 48.4% 15 414 30 704 13 381 28 733 54.1% 50% 13. Dondușeni 52.2% 9 462 17 496 7 790 15 584 45.7% 41.4% 14. Drochia 43.7% 16 677 36 504 13 588 32 806 44.4% 40% 15. Dubăsari 42.2% 6 276 14 124 5 642 14 089 47.9% 44.2% 16. Edineț 46.2% 16 341 34 099 13 229 29 919 50.2% 41.8% 17. Fălești 46.1% 18 387 36 649 14 409 34 449 48.5% 42.8% 18. Florești 45.8% 17 828 36 759 14 536 33 924 5. Participation in elections (first round)

5.7. Participation in the elections (continued)

Voter Men turnout Women 48.2% 43.1% 19. Glodeni 45.8% 1116.602 766 2436.892 403 9 698 22 492 39.6% 39.2% 20. Hîncești 39.4% 2016.602 205 36.892 51 002 18 827 47 973 45.9% 44.1% 353 608 21. Ialoveni 45% 19 938 43 464 18 250 41 354 43.3% 40.4% 22. Leova 41.9% 9 447 21 799 8 487 21 011 42.6% 43.1% 23. Nisporeni 42.8% 11 600 27 256 11 264 26 110 53.3% 46.9% 24. Ocnița 50.3% 1136.2% 477 21 550 8 934 19 037 49.8% 44.9% 25. Orhei 47.4% 25 677 51 524 21 736 48 439 50.7% 46.2% 26. Rezina 48.5% 9 767 19 267 8 814 19 060 50.3% 44.8% 27. Rîșcani 47.7% 13 870 27 592 11 278 25 171 46.3% 38.0% 28. Sîngerei 42.3% 16 673 35 977 13 045 34 284 52% 46.5% 29. Șoldănești 49.3% 8 713 16 749 7 483 16 083 47.3% 42.4% 30. Soroca 45.0% 19 394 40 979 15 751 37 137 45.1% 40.4% Voter turnout 31. Ștefan Vodă 42.8% 13 047 28 937 11 313 28 022 of women 43.7% 42.7% 32. Strășeni 43.2% 17.295 39 621 15 801 37 040 < 40% 45.7% 39.8% 40% - 43% 33. Taraclia 42.9% 8 117 17 751 6 627 16 654 49.3% 44.7% 43% - 46% 34. Telenești 47% 13 851 28 082 12 321 27 589 43.9% 39.7% 46% - 49% 20 401 46 491 17 333 43 706 35. Ungheni 41.8% > 49% 5. Participation in elections (first round)

5.8. Top 10 localities with the highest voter participation (rural area)

Voter Men turnout Women

79.3% total on the lists 84.1% total on the lists Corjova, Dubăsari 81,5% 449 566 382 454

75.4% 67.1% Bulboaca, Briceni 71.4% 276 366 230 343

71.4% 69.2% Teleşeuca, Dondușeni 70.3% 197 276 189 273

71.8% 68.3% Mihăileni, Briceni 70.1% 201 280 179 262

72.4% 67% Rural Rudi, Soroca 69.8% 283 391 238 355

71.7% 67.6% Pocrovca, Dondușeni 69.8% 320 446 282 417

70.6% 67.7% Mihălăşeni, Ocnița 69.2% 381 540 338 499

72.7% 61.9% 67.6% Mereşeuca, Ocnița 320 440 240 388

69.2% 65.6% Horodişte, Dondușeni 67.5% 231 334 193 294

68.8% 64.6% Sturzeni, Rîșcani 66.7% 313 455 277 429 5. Participation in elections (first round)

5.9. Top 10 localities with the highest voter participation (urban area)

Voter Men turnout Women

57.7% total on the lists 49.8% total on the lists 53.9% Tvardiţa, Taraclia 1 377 2 385 1 095 2 199

49.3% 50.8% Comrat 50% 5 718 11 598 4 999 9 836

50.5% 43.6% Costeşti, Rîșcani 47.2% 834 1 651 649 1 490

48.8% 44.9% 47% Vulcăneşti 3 628 7 430 2 857 6 362

49.1% 43.5% Urban Orhei 46.5% 7 051 14 358 5 170 11 896

42.7% 49.2% Cricova, Chișinău 46% 1 603 3 757 1 881 3 823

46.3% 45.3% Vatra, Chișinău 45.8% 760 1 641 629 1 389

47.4% 42.6% Mărculeşti, Florești 45.2% 332 700 249 584

45.1% 43.3% Frunză, Ocnița 44.3% 253 561 201 464

46.5% 38.7% Ghindeşti, Florești 42.9% 393 845 286 739 5. Participation in elections (first round)

5.10. Top 10 localities with the lowest voter participation (rural area)

Voter turnout Women Men total on the lists total on the lists 27.7% 25.5% Corjeuţi, Briceni 26.6% 831 2 995 732 2 871

30.6% 31.2% Mingir, Hîncești 30.9% 662 2 161 668 2 139

26.7% 35.6% Caracuşenii Vechi, Briceni 30.9% 458 1 718 567 1 594

30.6% 31.3% Mereni, Anenii Noi 31% 815 2 663 740 2 361

31.7% 30.6% Porumbeşti, Cantemir 31.2% 224 706 202 661 Rural

31.9% 30.8% Cociulia, Cantemir 31.3% 473 1 485 469 1 524

29.2% 34.3% Voinescu, Hîncești 31.8% 341 1 167 396 1 154

32.6% 31% Ţiganca, Cantemir 31.8% 435 1 335 398 1 284

31.9% 31.8% Selemet, Cimișlia 31.8% 489 1 535 438 1 376

35.2% 29.6% Colibaşi, Cahul 32.4% 852 2 420 706 2 388 5. Participation in elections (first round)

5.11. Top 10 localities with the lowest voter participation (urban area)

Voter Women Men turnout

30.9% total on the lists 30.5% total on the lists Căinari, Căușeni 30.7% 603 1 952 585 1 915

31.2% 31% Călăraşi 31.1% 2 216 7 096 1 925 6 207

31.8% 32.8% Cantemir 32.2% 694 2 185 625 1 907

34.1% 30.8% Soroca 32.6% 5 368 15 732 4 080 13 257

35.1% 32% Floreşti 33.7% 2 596 7 401 2 022 6 316

34.4% 33.2% Leova 33.8% 1 795 5 213 1 582 4 764 Urban 37.1% 32.2% Făleşti 33.8% 2 685 7 236 2 073 6 434

35% 34.9% Hînceşti 35% 2 804 8 008 2 385 6 827

36.9% 32.8% Ştefan Vodă 35% 1 486 4 024 1 151 3 511

34.5% 36.5% Cimişlia 35.4% 2 332 6 766 2 108 5 783 6. Participation in elections (second round)

6.1. Gender profile of voters that participated in the elections

Voter turnout 647 781 Participation rate 40.34% 41.21% 351 621 39.61% 296 160

Women Total on the lists Total on the lists Men 853 322 747 742

6.2. Gender profile of voters aged 18

Voter turnout

3 194 6 238 37.55% 34.10% 3 044 Participation rate 35.78%

Women Men Total on the lists Total on the lists 8 507 8 927 6. Participation in elections (second round)

6.3. Voter turnout in the Chișinău municipality

included on the lists

135 888 91 986 72 084 96 377 117 408 121 188

55.8% 57.7% 55.9% 55.3% 56.9% 52.2%

44.2% 35.4% 39.5%

44.7% 39.2% 43.1% 47.8%

42.3% 37.2% 44.1% 38.9% 37.3%

Botanica Buiucani Center Ciocana Rîșcani Suburbs

21.1% 14.2% 11.8% 14.2% 19.1% 19.6% % share of group out of the total voters that participated in the elections 240 603 6. Participation in elections (second round)

6.4. Participation in the elections Urban vs rural

183 133 162 014 46.6% 43.2%

Women Men Rural Total on the lists Total on the lists 392 883 374 708

168 488 134 146 36.6% 36%

Women Men Urban Total on the lists Total on the lists 460 439 373 034 6. Participation in elections (second round)

6.5. Top 10 localities with the highest voter participation (rural area)

Voter Women Men turnout 72.7% total on the lists 67.6% total on the lists Goleni, Edineț 70.4% 343 472 265 392

70% 69.3% Branişte, Rîșcani 69.7% 374 534 352 508

71.6% 67.3% Sturzeni, Rîșcani 69.5% 326 455 288 428

75.2% 62.8% Răcăria, Rîșcani 69.1% 539 717 428 682

70.5% 67.2% Mihălăşeni, Ocnița 68.9% 382 542 334 497

Rural 68.4% 66.3% Sămănanca, Orhei 67.3% 201 294 193 291

69.7% 64.6% Trifăuţi, Soroca 67.3% 285 409 230 356

65.4% 64.7% Lalova, Rezina 65% 321 491 330 510

66.4% 62.8% Tătărăuca Veche, Soroca 64.7% 517 779 449 715

66% 62.5% Şestaci, Șoldănești 64.3% 311 471 290 464 6. Participation in elections (second round)

6.6. Top 10 localities with the highest voter participation (urban area)

Voter Women Men turnout 50.6% total on the lists 42.7% total on the lists Tvardiţa, Taraclia 46.8% 1 206 2 385 939 2 199

42.8% 44.7% Sîngera, Chișinău 43.7% 1 735 4 050 1 608 3 601

41.2% 43.9% Codru, Chișinău 42.4% 3 078 7 479 2 852 6 491

42.1% 41.1% Teleneşti 41.6% 1 718 4 076 1 490 3 627

39.4% 37.9% Donduşeni 38.7% 1 606 4 079 1 298 3 427 Urban 40% 36.9% Anenii Noi 38.6% 1 751 4 377 1 357 3 682

39.1% 35.3% Sîngerei 37.3% 2 497 6 379 1 988 5 631

37.8% 36% Căuşeni 37% 3 345 8 851 2 801 7 774

35.4% 36.8% Durleşti, Chișinău 36.1% 3 720 10 502 3 329 9 044

39.6% 31.9% Otaci, Ocnița 36% 1 185 2 991 835 2 617 6. Participation in elections (second round)

6.7. Top 10 localities with the highest voter participation (urban area)

Voter Women Men turnout 27.1% total on the lists 28.3% total on the lists Mereni, Anenii Noi 27.7% 723 2 663 668 2 360

27.2% 30.6% Cojuşna, Strășeni 28.8% 874 3 215 901 2 941

28.8% 32% Voinescu, Hîncești 30.4% 336 1 167 370 1 155

34.2% 28.3% Alexăndreni, Sîngerei 31.3% 817 2 391 658 2 326

31.7% 31.1% Nicoreni, Drochia 31.4% 422 1 330 389 1 252 Rural 31.8% 31.4% Olăneşti, Ștefan Vodă 31.6% 740 2 327 642 2 043

31.5% 32.7% Cania, Cantemir 32.1% 498 1 579 528 1 614

31,8% 32.8% Nemţeni, Hîncești 32.3% 242 760 235 716

32.4% 32.4% Recea, Strășeni 32.4% 355 1 096 348 1 074

35.4% 32% Pelinia, Drochia 33.8% 1 126 3 179 890 2 784 6. Participation in elections (second round)

6.8. Top 10 localities with the lowest voter participation (urban area)

Voter Men turnout Women

25.3% total on the lists 26.5% total on the lists Călăraşi 25.8% 1 794 7 095 1 643 6 209

26.9% 24.8% Floreşti 25.9% 1 986 7 396 1 568 6 321

29.5% 26.8% Soroca 28.3% 4 634 15 712 3 546 13 238

30.5% 29.5% Leova 30% 1 589 5 210 1 408 4.767

32.7% 29.8% Ştefan Vodă 31.3% 1 317 4 026 1 047 3 514 Urban 31.1% 32.3% Cantemir 31.7% 681 2 188 616 1 909

33.1% 32.2% Edineţ 32.7% 2 702 8 156 2 171 6 742

34.6% 30.6% Făleşti 32.7% 2 501 7 235 1 971 6 432

33.9% 31.8% Rezina 32.9% 1 624 4 788 1 358 4 274

33.5% 33.2% Şoldăneşti 33.3% 1 114 3 330 1 001 3 015 7. Participation in elections (comparative analysis)

7.1. Gender profile of voters that participated in the recent elections

Total 1 649 402 1 390 537 881 667 1 440 733 1 614 023 1 453 013 1 184 779 647 781

54.31% 53.46% 53.2% 53.3% 52.97% 53.25% 53.18% 54.28%

46.54% 46.8% 46.7% 47.03% 46.75% 46.82% 45.69% 45.72%

Parliamentary Local Local Presidential Presidential Parliamentary Local Local 2014 General General 2016 2016 2019 General General 2015 2015 2019 2019 (1st round) (2nd round) (1st round) (2nd round) (1st round) (2nd round)

Women Men 8. Gender profile of the elected local officials

8.1. Gender profile of the Moldovan Mayors

196 21.83%

Total 898

78.17% 702

8.2. Gender profile of the Local Council 8.3. Gender profile of the District / Municipal members Council members

6 649 63.49% 27.08% 300

Total Total 10 472 1 108

36.51% 72.92% 808 3 823 8. Gender profile of the elected local officials

8.4. Gender profile of the Moldovan Mayors (comparative analysis)

82% 82%

79.4% 78.2%

20.6% 21.8% 18% 18%

2007 2011 2015 2019

Women Men 8. Gender profile of the elected local officials

8.5. Gender profile of the Local Council members (comparative analysis)

73.5% 71.4% 70% 63.5%

36.5%

28.6% 30% 26.5%

2007 2011 2015 2019

Women Men 8. Gender profile of the elected local officials

8.6. Gender profile of the District / Municipal Council members (comparative analysis)

86.8% 82.6% 81.5% 72.9%

27.1%

18.5% 17.4% 13.2%

2007 2011 2015 2019

Women Men 8. Gender profile of the elected local officials

8.7. Results of the 2019 General Local Elections

Mayors Local Council members District / Municipal Council members

51 210 1 035 1 611 59 179 Total: 261 Total: 2 646 Total: 238 PDM

42 164 1 087 1 899 94 232 Total: 206 Total: 2 986 Total: 326 PSRM

41 131 896 1 515 79 184 Total: 2 411 Total: 263 ACUM Total: 172

11 37 194 353 13 53 Total: 48 Total: 547 Total: 66 PLDM

13 30 257 264 22 50 Total: 43 Total: 521 Total: 72 PPȘ

7 17 78 171 20 31 Total: 24 Total: 249 Total: 51 PN

1 9 83 164 9 34 Total: 10 Total: 247 Total: 43 PCRM

Women Men 8. Gender profile of the elected local officials

8.7. Results of the 2019 General Local Elections (continued)

Mayors Local Council members District / Municipal Council members

1 6 17 59 1 8 Total: 7 Total: 9 PUN Total: 76

4 18 43 3 Total: 4 Total: 3 USB Total: 61

22 42 1 1 42 1 3 Total: 2 Total: 64 Total: 4 PL

1 1 13 27 1 3 Total: 4 PPEM Total: 2 Total: 40

1 1 4 8 Total: 2 PDA Total: 12

1 1 9 2 MSP FN Total: 1 Total: 10 Total: 2

1 5 12 1 Total: 1 Total: 17 Total: 1 PPR

Women Men 8. Gender profile of the elected local officials

8.7. Results of the 2019 General Local Elections (continued)

Mayors Local Council members District / Municipal Council members

1 8 11 1 PVE Total: 1 Total: 19 Total: 1

1 2 Total: 2 MSP SN Total: 1

1 4 14 Total: 1 PVP Total: 18

1 1 9 PAD Total: 10 Total: 1

3 6 PPM Total: 9

PLD

4 8 Total: 12 PNL

Women Men 8. Gender profile of the elected local officials

8.7. Results of the 2019 General Local Elections (continued) Women Men

Mayors Local Council members District / Municipal Council members

1 2 Total: 3 PRSM

PSE

PMPA

POM

1 1 Total: 2 PPRM

PSM

1 23 Independent 26 86 91 419 candidates Total: 112 Total: 510 Total: 24

196 702 3 823 6 649 300 808 Total: Total: 898 Total: 10 472 Total: 1 108 Local General Elections 2019 GENDER PERSPECTIVE

The infographics are produced by the Central Electoral Commission of Moldova, with the support of the "Enhancing democracy in Moldova through inclusive and transparent elections" Project, implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP Moldova) with the financial support of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the British Embassy in Chisinau through the Good Governance Fund and the Embassy of the Netherlands through the Matra Program.