Gender Profile of Voters That Participated in the Elections

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gender Profile of Voters That Participated in the Elections Local General Elections 2019 GENDER PERSPECTIVE List of abbreviations PSRM Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova BE ACUM Electoral Bloc „ACUM Platforma DA și PAS” PDM Democratic Party of Moldova PPȘ Political Party "Șor" PCRM Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova PLDM Liberal Democratic Party of Moldova PN Political Party "Partidul Nostru" PL Liberal Party PUN Political Party "Partidul Unității Naționale" USB Political Party "Uniunea Salvați Basarabia" PPEM Political Party "Partidul Popular European din Moldova" CEC Central Electoral Commission PVP Political Party "Voința Poporului" CCET Center for Continuous Electoral Training PNL National Liberal Party DEC II District Electoral Council (second level) PVE Political Party "Partidul Verde Ecologist" DEC I District Electoral Council (first level) PPR Political Party "Partidul Popular Românesc" PEB Precinct Electoral Bureau PDA Political Party "Democraţia Acasă" PAD Democratic Action Party MSP FN Socio-political Movement "Forța Nouă" PPRM Political Party "Partidul Popular din Republica Moldova" PMPA Political Party "Mişcarea Populară Antimafie" MSP SN Professionals' Movement "Speranţa-Надежда" POM Political Party "Partidul Oamenilor Muncii" PSE Political Party "Partidul Stînga Europeană" PPM Political Party "Patrioţii Moldovei" PRSM Political Party "Partidul Ruso-Slavean din Moldova" PLD Party of Law and Justice PSM Socialist Party of Moldova 1. Electoral management 1.1 Structure of the Central Electoral Commission 1.2 Structure of electoral management bodies Men 38.3% DEC II 9 16.2% 61.7% Women PEB 0 12.8% 83.8% DEC I Women 87.2% Men 1. Electoral management 2015 2019 Chairperson Deputy Chairperson CEC Secretary Members Chairperson 29% 71% 41% 59% Deputy Chairperson 46% 54% 53% 47% DEC II Secretary 83% 17% 79% 21% Members 52% 48% 63% 37% Chairperson 79% 21% 86% 14% Deputy Chairperson 81% 19% 83% 17% DEC I Secretary 97% 3% 98% 2% Members 85% 15% 86% 14% Chairperson 80% 20% 85% 15% Deputy Chairperson 78% 22% 82% 18% PEB Secretary 96% 4% 97% 3% Members 80% 20% 82% 18% Women Men Women Men 2. Training of electoral officials 2.1. Trained electoral officials (total) 87.1% 12.9% 5 606 831 Women Men Total 6 437 2.2. DEC II electoral officials trained 2.3. DEC II electoral officials trained 62% 38% 89% 11% 202 124 1 903 235 Total 326 Total 2 138 2.4. PEB electoral officials trained 2.5. PEB operators trained 88.1% 11.9% 74.1% 25.9% 3 501 472 2 286 799 Total 3 973 Total 3 085 2. Training of electoral officials 2.6. Comparative analysis of trained electoral officials 2015 Local General Elections 2019 Local General Elections 46% 54% 62% 38% DEC II 85% 15% 89% 11% DEC I 87% 13% 88% 12% PEB Women Men 3. Election observation Women Men 3.1. National observers accredited by the CEC 3.2. National observers accredited by the CEC 55.8% 44.2% 35.9 % 64.1% 927 734 52 93 Total 1 661 Total 145 3.3. Share of women among accredited observers National observers 1 180 2 315 3 399 3 389 1 661 International observers 544 139 636 776 145 Total 1 724 2 454 4 035 4 165 1 806 2 029 1 614 1 413 927 453 348 National observers 190 262 38 52 Women International observers Parliamentary Local Presidential Parliamentary Local 2014 General 2016 2019 General 2015 2019 4. Electoral competitors 4.1. Electoral competitors Candidates for Mayor Candidates for Local Council Candidates for District / Total Municipal Council candidates 189 567 4 049 5 082 458 651 PSRM 10 996 Total: 756 Total: 9 131 Total: 1 109 191 490 3 653 4 648 410 583 9 975 ACUM Total: 681 Total: 8 301 Total: 993 176 470 3 822 4 326 460 624 9 878 PDM Total: 646 Total: 8 148 Total: 1 084 205 270 2 611 2 184 416 424 6 110 PPȘ Total: 475 Total: 4 795 Total: 840 34 161 1 360 1 572 297 427 3 851 PCRM Total: 195 Total: 2 932 Total: 724 44 172 1 257 1 539 275 379 3 666 PLDM Total: 216 Total: 2 796 Total: 654 41 109 942 1 116 283 372 2 863 PN Total: 150 Total: 2 058 Total: 655 Women Men 4. Electoral competitors 4.1. Electoral competitors (continued) Candidates for District / Total Candidates for Mayor Candidates for Local Council Municipal Council candidates 19 57 450 495 207 216 1 444 Total: 76 Total: 945 Total: 423 PL 7 48 304 393 118 173 1 043 Total: 55 Total: 697 Total: 291 PUN 8 32 232 289 94 114 769 USB Total: 40 Total: 521 Total: 208 7 15 165 190 72 84 533 PPEM Total: 22 Total: 355 Total: 156 3 20 151 174 71 87 506 PVP Total: 23 Total: 325 Total: 158 3 11 86 93 75 73 341 Total: 14 Total: 179 Total: 148 PNL 4 12 106 107 56 46 331 Total: 16 Total: 213 Total: 102 PVE Women Men 4. Electoral competitors 4.1. Electoral competitors (continued) Total Candidates for Mayor Candidates for Local Council Candidates for District / Municipal Council candidates 1 15 79 110 49 62 316 PPR Total: 16 Total: 189 Total: 111 2 9 58 71 45 61 PDA Total: 11 Total: 129 Total: 106 246 8 91 69 11 15 194 PAD Total: 8 Total: 160 Total: 26 2 7 37 44 22 32 144 MSP FN Total: 9 Total: 81 Total: 54 5 22 28 8 8 71 PPRM Total: 5 Total: 50 Total: 16 2 15 26 7 12 62 Total: 2 Total: 41 Total: 19 PMPA 2 8 10 11 15 46 Total: 2 Total: 18 Total: 26 MSP SN Women Men 4. Electoral competitors 4.1. Electoral competitors (continued) Women Men Candidates for Mayor Candidates for Local Council Candidates for District / Total Municipal Council candidates 1 2 11 14 8 10 46 POM Total: 3 Total: 25 Total: 18 3 5 3 14 17 42 PSE Total: 3 Total: 8 Total: 31 19 22 41 PPM Total: 41 2 14 19 35 PRSM Total: 2 Total: 33 1 4 6 9 11 31 PLD Total: 1 Total: 10 Total: 20 1 1 8 12 22 PSM Total: 2 Total: 20 Independent 81 251 158 735 14 111 1 350 candidates Total: 332 Total: 893 Total: 125 1 019 2 742 19 709 23 365 3 498 4 619 Total: Total: 3 761 Total: 43 074 Total: 8 117 54 952 4. Electoral competitors 4.2. Candidates for Mayor 17.3% 1. Chișinău mun. 22 105 Total: 127 14.3% 2. Bălți mun. 3 18 Total: 21 26% 3. ATU Găgăuzia 25 71 Total: 96 38.2% 4. Anenii Noi 42 68 Total: 110 20.7% 5. Basarabeasca 6 23 Total: 29 24.5% 6. Briceni 25 77 Total: 102 32,6% 7. Cahul 43 89 Total: 132 24.8% 27.1% 1 019 8. Călărași 25 76 Total: 101 26.8% 9. Cantemir 30 82 Total: 112 Total 27.6% 3 761 10. Căușeni 34 89 Total: 123 72.9% 28% 2 742 11. Cimișlia 23 59 Total: 82 29.8% 12. Criuleni 31 73 Total: 104 22.7% 13. Dondușeni 17 58 Total: 75 24% 14. Drochia 31 98 Total: 129 19% Women Men 15. Dubăsari 8 34 Total: 42 35.9% 16. Edineț 46 82 Total: 128 35.3% 17. Fălești 54 99 Total: 153 28.7% 18. Florești 49 122 Total: 171 4. Electoral competitors 4.2. Candidates for Mayor (continued) 24.2% 19. Glodeni 23 72 Total: 95 19.3% 20. Hîncești 29 121 Total: 150 20.4% 21. Ialoveni 23 90 Total: 113 31.7% 22. Leova 26 56 Total: 82 16.2% 23. Nisporeni 12 62 Total: 74 27.1% 24. Ocnița 23 62 Total: 85 28.6% 25. Orhei 56 140 Total: 196 27.1% 26. Rezina 29 78 Total: 107 30.5% 27. Rîșcani 40 91 Total: 131 33.9% 28. Sîngerei 43 105 Total: 127 29.8% Women candidates: 29. Șoldănești 25 59 Total: 84 27.1% < 20% 30. Soroca 42 113 Total: 155 20% 31. Ștefan Vodă 19 76 Total: 95 20% - 25% 25.7% 32. Strășeni 27 78 Total: 105 25% - 30% 28.3% 33. Taraclia 15 38 Total: 53 28.3% 30% - 35% 34. Telenești 32 81 Total: 113 25.8% > 35% 35. Ungheni 41 118 Total: 159 5. Participation in elections (first round) 5.1. Gender profile of voters that participated in the elections Turnout 41.68% 1 173 834 43.1637 % 625 total on the lists 54.3% 47.7% 637 625 1 478 778 637 625 536 209 40.5% total on the lists 536 209 1 324 520 5.2. Gender profile of voters aged 18 Turnout 37.4% 11 902 39.3% total on the lists 51.2% 48.8% 6 092 15 502 6 092 5 810 35.7% total on the lists 5 810 16 280 Women Men 5. Participation in elections (first round) 5.3. Gender profile of voters that participated in the elections (by gender and age) included on the lists 313 659 935 396 714 543 637 845 201 855 51.4% 55.4% Women 62.6% 63.1% 51% 53.2% 41.3% 44.6% 61.1% 37.4% 25.8% 48.6% 49% 29.1% 46.8% Men 18 - 25 26 - 40 41 - 55 56 - 70 71+ years years years years 6.9% 23.2% 25.2% 34.3% 10.5% % share of group out of the total voters that participated in the elections 1 173 834 5. Participation in elections (first round) 5.4.
Recommended publications
  • Media Monitoring During the Electoral Campaign for the Early Parliamentary Elections of July 11, 2021
    Media monitoring during the electoral campaign for the early parliamentary elections of July 11, 2021 Report no. 5 July 2-10, 2021 This report has been prepared with the financial support of the Office of the Embassy of the Netherlands in Moldova. General data Purpose and objectives of the project: Monitoring and informing the public about media behavior during the electoral campaign and access of electoral competitors to the media. The monitoring aims to analyze reporting trends that may affect the performance of media outlets and compromise their ability to provide truthful, unbiased, and pluralistic information to the public. Monitoring period: June 1 – July 10, 2021 Criteria for selecting media outlets for monitoring: • Audience / impact: national, regional • Type of media: audiovisual • Form of ownership: public, private • Language of broadcasting: Romanian, Russian List of monitored media outlets: Moldova 1 (19:00) – public television, national coverage, broadcasts in Romanian and Russian Prime TV (21:00) – private television, national coverage, broadcasts in Romanian and Russian Primul în Moldova (18:00) – private television, national coverage, broadcasts in Romanian and Russian Publika TV (online version) – private television, national coverage, broadcasts in Romanian and Russian Jurnal TV (19:00) – private television, regional coverage, broadcasts in Romanian and Russian NTV Moldova (19:00) – private television, regional coverage, broadcasts in Romanian and Russian RTR Moldova (20:00) – private television, regional coverage,
    [Show full text]
  • Report 4, Promo-Lex, June 15-24, 2015
    THE CIVIC COALITION FOR FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS PROMO-LEX ASSOCIATION REPORT No 4 Monitoring of the General Local Elections of 14 (28) June 2015 Monitoring period: 15-24 June 2015 Published on 26 June 2015 Chisinau, 2015 1 All rights reserved. The content of the Report may be used and reproduced for not-for-profit purposes and without the preliminary consent of Promo-LEX Association, provided that the source of information is indicated. The Monitoring Effort of the General Local Elections of 14 (28) June 2015 is supported financially by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Council of Europe, and benefits of technical assistance provided by the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI). The opinions presented in the Report belong to authors and do not necessarily reflect the donors’ view. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 FINDINGS .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 DEFICIENCIES OF THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF THE SECOND ROUND OF ELECTIONS ............................................................................................................. 5 ELECTORAL BODIES .................................................................................................................................. 6 ACCREDITATION
    [Show full text]
  • Moldova 2021 STATEMENT of PRELIMINARY
    ENEMO International Election Observation Mission Early Parliamentary Elections, 11 July - Moldova 2021 STATEMENT OF PRELIMINARY FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 12 July, 2021 ENEMO preliminarily assesses that the electoral process, including the Election Day, was conducted mostly in line with international standards. Elections were administered efficiently and in a transparent manner by the electoral administration, although some of the most important CEC decisions put into question the impartiality of some of its members. The campaign was competitive but marred by a number of alleged violations including misuse of administrative resources, illegal financing, and vote-buying. The polarized and largely biased media landscape, as well as the dissemination of false information, have limited the range of political views presented to voters. Delays in complaints adjudication as well as inconsistent decisions on key aspects of the electoral process additionally affected legal certainty. 1 | P a g e On 1 June the European Network of Election Monitoring Organizations (ENEMO) deployed an International Election Observation Mission (IEOM) to Moldova to observe the Early Parliamentary Elections of 11 July 2021. This is ENEMO’s fifth mission to Moldova. ENEMO has accredited a total of 7 Core Team experts and ten long-term observers (LTOs). Due to health risks created by the COVID-19 pandemic, the IEOM is operating partially remotely, with only a part of the Core Team being deployed in the country. LTOs were additionally deployed in Moldova for Election Day, to observe a selected number of polling stations. ENEMO observed the opening of polling stations, voting and counting processes at 158 polling stations. Additionally, up until July 10, the ENEMO IEOM conducted 738 meetings, 274 with election management bodies, 98 with political parties, 58 with candidates, 94 with state officials, 59 with media, 138 with domestic civil society organizations and 17 with other stakeholders, in addition to observing 23 campaign activities (meetings or rallies).
    [Show full text]
  • Media Monitoring Moldova 1St Round
    Moldova – Local Elections 2007 OSCE/ODIHR EOM’s Media Monitoring prior to the 1 st round of elections Since the start of the campaign on 4 May, the OSCE/ODIHR EOM has monitored six TV stations and nine daily and weekly newspapers. In addition, the monitoring team has undertaken analysis of the main news broadcasts of two regional TV channels and two radio stations. The media unit has been analyzing the programs and daily publications, assessing and producing findings on the time or space allocated to all candidates and parties running in the local elections, as well as the time/space allocation given to all the relevant political entities. The tone of the coverage was also evaluated. Quantitative analysis measures the total amount of time and space devoted to election contestants on news and information programs. Qualitative analysis evaluates the tone in which the relevant political subjects have been portrayed – positive, neutral or negative. While the monitoring focused on all political and election-related programs and broadcasts in the prime time (from 18:00 till 24:00), the enclosed charts show only coverage of relevant political subjects in the prime time news programs. While the monitoring included all the registered political subjects and entities, the enclosed charts show only those subjects receiving significant amounts of time/space. Complete results of media monitoring, including the patterns observed on other TV channels, radios and newspapers, as well as the coverage provided in the run-up to the 17 June second round contests, will be published concurrently with the final report. Explanation of the charts The pie charts show the total percentage of airtime or space allocated to relevant political subjects for each media outlet in the defined period.
    [Show full text]
  • National Dataset ZA4793
    TECHNICAL Reports 2010|17 EVS 2008 Method Report Country Report - Republic of Moldova Documentation of the full data release 30/11/10 Related to the national dataset Archive-Study-No. ZA4793, doi:10.4232/1.10184 European Values Study and GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Acknowledgements The fieldwork of the 2008 European Values Study (EVS) was financially supported by universities and research institutes, national science foundations, charitable trusts and foundations, companies and church organizations in the EVS member countries. A major sponsor of the surveys in several Central and Eastern European countries was Renovabis. Renovabis - Solidarity initiative of the German Catholics with the people in Central and Eastern Europe: Project No. MOE016847 http://www.renovabis.de/. An overview of all national sponsors of the 2008 survey is provided in the “EVS 2008 Method Report” in section funding agency/sponsor, the “EVS 2008 Guidelines and Recommendations”, and on the web- site of the European Values Study http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/evs/sponsoring.html. The project would not have been possible without the National Program Directors in the EVS member countries and their local teams. Gallup Europe developed a special questionnaire translation system WebTrans, which appeared to be very valuable and enhanced the quality of the project. Special thanks also go to the teams at Tilburg University, CEPS/INSTEAD Luxembourg, and GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Cologne. 2 GESIS-Technical Reports No. 17 Contents Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • ENEMO International Election Observation Mission Early Parliamentary Elections, 11 July
    ENEMO International Election Observation Mission Early Parliamentary Elections, 11 July - Moldova 2021 INTERIM REPORT 01.06.2021-25.06.2021 30 June, 2021 ENEMO considers that the existing electoral legislation provides the main preconditions for conducting competitive early parliamentary elections. However, there are a number of insufficient and unclear regulations requiring to be addressed in order to avoid contradicting interpretations and improve the electoral legislation. The electoral administration mostly managed their activities within the legal deadlines and acted transparently, though some decisions of the CEC raised questions regarding impartiality of some of its members. On 1 June 2021, the European Network of Election Monitoring Organizations (ENEMO) officially deployed an International Election Observation Mission (IEOM) to Moldova to observe the upcoming Parliamentary Elections of 11 July 2021. ENEMO has accredited a total of 7 Core Team experts and ten long-term observers (LTOs) working in five teams. Due to health risks created by the COVID-19 pandemic, the IEOM is operating partially remotely, with only a part of the Core Team being deployed in the country. On Election Day ENEMO will observe the opening of polling stations, voting and counting processes. The Mission is headed by Dr. Zlatko Vujovic. This is ENEMO’s fifth mission to Moldova. The presence of ENEMO during the 2021 Early Parliamentary Elections in Moldova will provide the national and international community with elaborate information about the electoral process. Up until 25 June, the ENEMO IEOM has conducted 408 meetings, 132 with election management bodies, 64 with political parties, 37 with candidates, 50 with state officials, 31 with media and 82 with domestic civil society organizations, 12 with other stakeholders, in addition to observing 20 campaign activities (meetings or rallies).
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring of the General Local Elections of 20 October 2019 from the Perspective of the Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities
    Monitoring of the General Local Elections of 20 October 2019 from the Perspective of the Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities Monitoring period: 18 October 2019 – 13 November 2019 Project funded by the Project co-financed by Sweden European Union The Report was produced as part of the Project ‘Civil Society Advocacy for Inclusive and Fair Elections in Moldova, Compliant with EU and OSCE/ODIHR Recommendations and Human Rights Commitments’, implemented by the East Europe Foundation (EEF) in partnership with the ‘Partnership for Development’ Center (PDC), Piligrim Demo, and Tarna Rom, funded by the European Union and co-funded by Sweden. The opinions expressed herein belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the donors’ view. Chisinau, 13 November 2019 TABLE OF CONTENS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................4 METHODOLOGY...............................................................................................6 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................7 KEY FINDINGS ON THE FOLLOWING: I. Degree of persons with disabilities’ inclusion by the election candidates in the election campaign. Representation of persons with disabilities on the lists of candidates and their involvement in election campaign activities...............................................................................9 II. Accessibility of the information on election candidates’ platforms for persons with mobility, sensory, mental,
    [Show full text]
  • Moldovan Headaches
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by eDoc.VifaPol Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg Claus Neukirch Moldovan Headaches The Republic of Moldova 120 days after the 2001 Parliamentary Elections Working Paper 3 Moldovan Headaches The Republic of Moldova 120 days after the 2001 Parliamentary Elections 1. Introduction The 2001 Parliamentary Elections in the Republic of Moldova were conducted in an atmos- phere of extreme social and economic hardship. The average monthly salary in the former Soviet Republic, sandwiched between Romania and Ukraine, is around 30 US-Dollar today and the real GDP of the country has fallen to 30 percent of the pre-independence level1. Moldova, which has no natural resources and whose economy is dominated by the agricul- tural sector, has now replaced Albania as the poorest country in Europe. When Moldovans were asked in a recent opinion poll what they fear most, 39 percent of the respondents an- swered ‘poverty’. In the same poll 87 percent stated that their income is hardly enough to cover their minimum expenses and 52 percent said that they would leave Moldova for good or at least for a certain period of time2. Already today over 700,000 Moldovan citizens are said to be abroad. Ten years after independence, Moldova has become a country without much hope, battered not only by economic decline, corruption3 and debt4 but also by an identity crises. The discussions of the early nineties, on whether Moldova is a nation in its own right or simply an offshoot of Romania, have quieted down, but not disappeared altogether.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 3, Promo-Lex, May 21
    THE CIVIC COALITION FOR FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS PROMO-LEX REPORT No 3 Monitoring of the General Local Elections of 14 (28) June 2015 Monitoring period: 21 May - 10 June 2015 Published on 12 June 2015 Chisinau, 2015 1 All rights are protected. The content of the Report may be used and reproduced for not-for-profit purposes and without the preliminary consent of Promo-LEX Association, provided that the source of information is indicated. The Monitoring Effort of the General Local Elections of 14 (28) June 2015 is supported financially by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Council of Europe, and benefits of technical assistance provided by the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI). The opinions presented in the report belong to authors and do not necessarily reflect the donors’ view. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 4 FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1. ELECTORAL BODIES ...........................................................................................................................5 2. CIVIL SOCIETY .................................................................................................................................. 12 3. LOCAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Survey on Party Ideology in Former Socialist Countries, 1990-2017
    EXPERT SURVEY ON PARTY IDEOLOGY IN FORMER SOCIALIST COUNTRIES, 1990-2017 Data set on ideology of ruling political parties and coalitions in former socialist states of Central and Eastern Europe. Data is retrieved from an expert survey which included a multinational panel of 273 experts on party systems of 16 countries. The survey was conducted online in June and July 2017 by Dejan Bursać, researcher at the Belgrade-based Institute for Political Studies, as a part of his doctoral research at the University of Belgrade. The respondents were asked to locate each party on a general left-right scale, considering all aspects of party policy and all relevant information about a party position. Ideology of each party is presented numerically in the one-dimensional policy space, ranging from 0 (extreme left) to 10 (extreme right), for every parliamentary term/government since the first multi-party elections after the fall of socialism (and in some cases, after achieving national independence) in all 16 countries of the sample. Average ideology of every government is presented as a weighted mean of member parties, in relation to their parliamentary strength. This document is accompanied by a separate excel database. Please cite accordingly: Bursac, Dejan (2018). Expert survey on party ideology in former socialist countries, 1990-2017. Retrieved from: http://www.ips.ac.rs/researchers/dejan-bursac/ 1 Table of Contents POLAND ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vocea Basarabiei, Russkoe Radio
    Monitoring of Mass Media Coverage of Campaign for General Local Elections General Report1 The project is financed by Eurasia Foundation, from the funds of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), National Endowment for Democracy (NED), USA, and the OSCE Mission to the Republic of Moldova. The opinions expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the funding organizations. The publication of this report was possible with the financial support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The opinions expressed in this document belong to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of USAID or American Government. 1 1. General data 1.1 Project goal: to monitor and inform the public opinion about the behavior of mass media during the campaign for general local elections in Moldova. 1.2 Monitoring period – 10 April 2007–17 June 2007 – covers the electoral campaign with two rounds. 1.3 Criteria for the selection of media outlets subject to the monitoring: • type of ownership (public and private) • audience/ impact • broadcasting language 1.4 Monitored mass media: TV Moldova 1, PRO TV, NIT, Euro TV Chişinău, TV 7, N 4 Radio Radio Moldova, Antena C, Vocea Basarabiei, Russkoe Radio Print media Moldova suverană, Nezavisimaia Moldova, Săptămîna, Flux, Moldavskie vedomosti, Jurnal de Chişinău, Timpul de dimineaţă, Komsomolskaia pravda; Unghiul, Căuşenii, SP (Bălţi), Golos Bălţi, Vesti Gagauzii, Realitatea (Soroca), Observatorul de nord (Soroca), Farul nistrean (Rezina) 1.5 Monitoring time schedule TV Monday-Friday 06:30 – 09:00 and 17:00 – 22:30 Saturday-Sunday 06:30 – 22:30 Radio Monday-Sunday 06:00 – 24:00 1.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Document
    REPORT No 3 Promo-LEX Observation Mission for the Early Parliamentary Elections of 11 July 2021 Observation period: 2 6 May – 8 June 2021 Published on 10 June 2021 June 8, 2021 June 8, 20212021 Chisinau, 2021 All rights reserved. The content of the Report may be used and reproduced for not-for-profit purposes and without the preliminary consent of Promo-LEX Association, provided that the source of information is indicated. The content of this report can be subject to editing. The report is developed as part of the Observation Mission for the Early Parliamentary Elections of 11 July 2021 conducted by Promo-LEX Association with the financial support of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) via the ‘Democracy, Transparency and Accountability’ Program, of the Council of Europe through the project “Support for the civic observation of the early parliamentary elections of 2021 in polling stations created abroad”, as well as the Embassy office of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Moldova through the project “Support for informing citizens and civic observation of Early Parliamentary Elections in 2021 in the polling stations created by voters in the Transnistrian region”. ‘Hate speech’ component is supported by Justice and Human Rights Department of Soros Foundation Moldova under ‘Consolidation of a platform for the development of activism and education in the area of human rights in Moldova – stage IV’ Project. The responsibility for the view shared in this Report belongs to Promo-LEX Association and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of donors. If there are any discrepancies between the text in Romanian and its translation, the provisions formulated in Romanian shall prevail.
    [Show full text]