DOCSLIB.ORG

New Dock at Raley's Landing Project Addendum No. 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Dock at Raley's Landing Project Addendum No. 4 NEW DOCK AT RALEY’S LANDING PROJECT ADDENDUM NO. 4 June 4, 2019 __________________________________ James Strand, Project Manager Page 1 of 185184 CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO Department Of Public Works 1110 West Capitol Avenue, 1st Floor West Sacramento, California 95691 ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO NEW DOCK AT RALEY’S LANDING PROJECT THIS ADDENDUM shall be considered as part of the contract documents and shall be signed and attached to the volume of proposal documents, which must be submitted with the bid. The following revision is to be made to the Contract Documents: 1. See Attached Response to Questions 2. See Attached Detail Sketch to Item 7 of Response to Questions 3. See Attached Detail Sketch to Item 56 of Response to Questions 4. See Attached EEO Certification Form 5. See Attached Revised Bid Schedule 6. See Attached Permits *Note: To save paper, please print only the first page of Attachment #6 when submitting signed copy of Addendum No.4 with your bid. The cost of meeting these requirements shall be included in the bid prices for the respective items of work and no additional compensation will be allowed therefore. I acknowledge receipt of Addendum Number 4 to the subject project and accept all conditions contained herein. The information and revisions presented in this Addendum has been considered in preparation of my proposal. Bidder___________________________________ Signature:________________________________ Date:________________ Title:_____________________________________ Page 2 of 185 ATTACHMENT 1 RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS ITEM# RFI QUESTIONS ANSWERS The Contract Documents (General Conditions 5.25 and Special Provisions Section 6), require contractor to indemnify the City without any exclusion for the indemnitee’s sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct (See California Civil Code Section 2782(b). Please confirm that the City’s intent is that the Indemnity provisions of the contract comply with applicable Section 5.25 clearly exempts claims “caused by law and please modify the Contract Documents the active negligence, the sole negligence, or the 1 accordingly. willful misconduct of the City.” Please clarify if USL&H Workers Compensation Insurance (US Longshore Insurance) will be a requirement for this project? Please further clarify if landside contractors will be required to Refer to 2-8, CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFCATE 2 carry USL&H Insurance, as this is not typical. REGARDING WORKERS COMPENSATION Are there any geotechnical reports available to review? Do bidders need to provide the See Addendum #3. No, this has been provided by 3 geotechnical engineering services? GHD and paid by the City. Regarding the design-build nature of the floating dock system, the project specifications and drawings show prescriptive design details for the floating dock system. The drawings show specific design details including waler sizing, etc. that will not take into account the float manufacturers standards and own engineering creativity to meet the performance requirements of the floating dock system. In addition, the specification provided contains several differences from the float manufacturer’s standards (wall thickness, etc.). The specifications state that the dock manufacturer is required to submit stamped, signed Design Drawings and Design Calculations sealed by a Professional Engineer for the floating dock system (i.e. Float Designer). Since the floating dock manufacturer is responsible to design the final product, we would like clarification that the drawings and specifications are provided for reference to The bid documents present performance describe performance requirements and the float specifications for the floating docks and are not manufacturer shall be responsible for the final intended to be prescriptive. The dock design and performance of the floating dock manufacturer will be responsible for final design 4 system. Please clarify. and performance of the system. Page 3 of 185184 The engineer of the floating dock system would like to propose an alternate match-cast, post-tensioned robust concrete floating dock system as opposed to the 58’ long x 24’ wide x 5’-6” deep steel berthing dock. Will the berthing dock system be allowed to be constructed of a series of precast, match-cast, EPS foam-filled concrete modules, which are held together using a bonded post-tensioned strands or bars so they create a continuous concrete beam? This technology is exactly what has been constructed on several other projects with a long proven history. This includes most recently, the USS Arizona Memorial Ferry Dock in Pearl Harbor where GHD was the Owner’s Engineer. Will the City accept an alternate concrete match-cast, post- tensioned dock system designed by the dock system engineer, while complying with the design criteria? The match-cast, post-tensioned concrete dock system is a better solution for the following reasons: a. The concrete dock system is an unsinkable structure. The steel platform is hollow, therefore, upon a heavy impact incident, it runs the risk of a hole being punctured into the hollow pontoon and subsequently sinking. b. The concrete dock system does not require the maintenance of a steel platform. The steel platform would need to be removed from the location at unknown intervals for maintenance. The concrete dock system would be a permanent structure equivalent or better to a steel barge with a designed service life of up to 50 years. c. The match-cast, post-tensioned alternate dock system would realize greater longevity and durability when compared to a steel barge system for a lesser cost. By utilizing the alternate dock system, the Contractor would be responsible for the design and construction (without pointing fingers to manufacture a prescriptive design). Match-cast, post-tensioned construction has a long history of successful use worldwide, and is common in the construction of large bridge projects where fatigue resistance and environmental durability are crucial. The post-tensioning elements will be protected from corrosion by filling the PT duct with an appropriate grout or grease product. Concrete shear keys are used to provide continuity and shear transfer at the float joints. This configuration forms a continuous floating structure where the post-tensioning force is sufficient A concrete float would be acceptable provided all to prevent the float joints from opening at the tension performance and service life requirements are face during the design vertical and lateral loading events. Fabrication of the precast modules in a met. Please note that mudline elevations at the controlled factory setting results in a more consistent dock location require a float draft no greater than and reliable product when compared to onsite shown for the steel float to avoid grounding the 5 construction. float during low river levels. Page 4 of 185 “The Contractor shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees, and give all notices necessary and incident to the lawful prosecution of the work. All permits and licenses shall be obtained in sufficient time to prevent delays to the Work. The Contractor shall, at a minimum, possess and maintain the licenses and permits set forth in the Contract Provisions.” At the prebid meeting, it was stated that the Contractors are not responsible for permitting. a. Please clarify if the City be responsible for all permitting requirements. a & b. Yes, the City has been wokring with project b. Has the City started the permitting process with respective agencies and will pay all fees & any regulatory entities? permits, contractor will coordinate and follow c. Please provide copies of any permits obtained requirements of conditions and permits. C. see thus far. attachment #5 d. Please clarify if the Contractor has any d. Prime Contractor's and subcontractors will be 6 responsibility for obtaining any required permits. responsible to obtain a local buisiness liscense. There is not a detail provided for the attachment of the cast-in-place concrete to the steel framing Please see sketch detail provided for framing to for the ramps leading to the gangways. Please CIP concrete deck connection detail in 7 provide a specified attachment. Attachment #2 Precast deck panels will be acceptable provided May the cast-in-place concrete be substituted all structural load requirements are met and with precast panels mechanically attached to the supporting calculations are submitted for 8 steel framing? attachment of precast panels to the steel framing. Will the City allow the Contractor to utilize the E Street access to enter the Riverwalk Park in order Yes. Contractor will coordinate access with CalStrs 9 to access the staging area? Project and the City. The City has specified PCI Certification Program for Quality Control of the Concrete Floating Dock System. Please confirm that the ISO 9001 Quality Assurance and Certification program is an ISO 9001 Quality Assurance and Certification 10 acceptable program. program will be acceptable. Required License for Prime Contractor. In addition to the requirement of a Class A Contractors License, can the City please confirm that the Contractor will be required to possess a A C-10 Electrical liscense will be required for 11 C-10 Electrical License? electrical work. Can the City please clarify the waterside access location that will be provided to the Contractor to launch the pile barge and floating docks into the Broderick Boat Ramp will be accessible for loading water? Will the Broderick boat launch ramp be and unloading and must be coordinated and 12 available for the Contractor’s waterside access? approved with the City for public access and use. Page 5 of 185 Section 35 40 00; Paragraph 1.2.A: Would a post- Post-tensioned concrete dock system will be 13 tensioned concrete dock system be acceptable? acceptable. Section 35 40 00; Paragraph 2.1.D.1: Confirm that reinforcing steel will be industry standard, epoxy Reinforcing steel for concrete docks shall be 14 coated (ASTM 775). epoxy coated per ASTM A775.) Section 35 40 00; Paragraph 2.1.D.2: Typical industry standard is ASTM A-185.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sacramento Historic Trails
    Sacramento Historic Trail Hike And Sacramento Historic R. R. Trail Hike 1 Sacramento Historic Hike How to take the hike 1) Railroad Museum (requires admission fee, save ticket stubs) 2) Sacramento History Museum 3) Big Four Building. From the RR Museum, exit to the right. Big Four Building is located and the RR Library and the Hardware store is located within. 4) The earliest Sacramento, a tent city. 5) Central Pacific RR Passenger Station 6) Eagle Theatre. Across the street from the CPRP Station 7) Cobblestone Streets 8) The Globe and the Delta King. 9) Pony Express Rider statue. NE Corner of 2nd and J 10) Sacramento Southern RR. From Front Street, go up K. St. to see the Lady Adams Building. Return to Front St. and you can go to the Visitor’s Center. Continue on Front St. to the Old Schoolhouse Museum on the SW corner of Front and L Streets. 11) Hike down K Street past the Convention Center to the State Indian Museum. Go to L Street to Sutter’s Fort. 12) From Sutter’s Fort, hike down L Street over to the State Capitol and take a self-guided tour. 13) From the State Capitol, hike down Capitol Avenue to 9th Street and head south to N Street. Visit Stanford House (Currently closed for renovations) 14) From Stanford House, head west on N Street and turn left on 3rd Street to Crocker Art Gallery. 2 15) From the Crocker Art Gallery, hike to SVRR Station and then back to Old Town. 16) Head back up Front Street and under Capitol to Old Town.
    [Show full text]
  • Delta King (Bulk 1990-1994, N.D.)
    Guide to the Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency Downtown Development Collection - Delta King (bulk 1990-1994, n.d.) Collection Number: 2000/019 Sacramento Archives and Museum Collection Center Sacramento, California 2 Descriptive Summary Collection Name: Downtown Development Collection – Delta King Collection Number: 2000/019 Collector: City of Sacramento Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency Extent: 1 cubic foot Repository: Sacramento Archives & Museum Collection Center 551 Sequoia Pacific Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 264-7072 Abstract: Created in 1973, the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (SHRA) is the lead public agency and public developer regarding affordable housing, housing issues, and redevelopment projects for the city and the county. SHRA oversees residential and commercial revitalization activities in redevelopment areas throughout the city. The Agency offers a variety of financial assistance programs for first-time homebuyers, and provides several loan programs and other assistance to the business community. This collection contains in-depth information from the City of Sacramento and the Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency and their concurrence to establish the best master plan to demonstrate opportunities and constraints for the riverfront project area of Old Sacramento with emphasis on how the Delta King as a riverfront attraction could contribute to the economy of the area and become solvent. These plans also include recommendations for land use, building areas, layout of open space, opportunities for public, art culture, recreation, and services (shops, hotel, eateries), parking, marine access, and pedestrian access. 3 Administration Information Access: Collection is open for research. Publication Rights: Copyright has not been assigned to the Sacramento Archives and Museum Collections Center (SAMCC) for private collections.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency Records
    This thesis/project/dissertation has been reviewed for 508 compliance. To request enhancements, please email [email protected]. THE SACRAMENTO HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECORDS: DEVELOPMENT IN DOWNTOWN SACRAMENTO, 1960s TO 1990s A Project Presented to the faculty of the Department of History California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History (Public History) by Jason Partida FALL 2018 © 2018 Jason Partida ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii THE SACRAMENTO HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECORDS: DEVELOPMENT IN DOWNTOWN SACRAMENTO, 1960s TO 1990s A Project by Jason Partida Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Lee Simpson, Ph.D. __________________________________, Second Reader Dylan McDonald ____________________________ Date iii Student: Jason Partida I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the project. __________________________, Graduate Coordinator ___________________ Anne Lindsay, Ph.D. Date Department of Public History iv Abstract of THE SACRAMENTO HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECORDS: DEVELOPMENT IN DOWNTOWN SACRAMENTO, 1960s TO 1990s by Jason Partida The practice of urban renewal in Sacramento has a long history, with the first signs of urban redevelopment taking place after natural disasters afflicted the city. Like the rest of the nation, urban renewal took center stage as a response to the spread of blight in cities. This thesis project explores the work of the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency, particularly in the second half of the twentieth-century. The work undertaken by the agency, reflects the city’s demand in preserving and redeveloping their West End and the downtown district.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento Ephemera Collection
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c89g5nmz No online items Guide to the Sacramento Ephemera Collection Amanda G. DeWilde Sacramento Room, Sacramento Public Library 828 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 264-2976 Fax: (916) 264-2884 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.saclibrary.org Copyright 2013 Sacramento Public Library. All rights reserved. Guide to the Sacramento EC 1 Ephemera Collection Guide to the Sacramento Ephemera Collection Sacramento Public Library Sacramento Room Sacramento, California Processed by: Amanda DeWilde, Sarah Sault, Kristy Molnar and James Scott Date Completed: 2013 Encoded by: Sarah Sault, James Scott and Amanda DeWilde Copyright 2013 Sacramento Public Library. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Sacramento Ephemera Collection Dates: 1859-2019 Collection number: EC Collection Size: 37.5 linear ft.(87 archival boxes) Repository: Sacramento Public Library. Sacramento Room Sacramento, California 95814 Abstract: The Sacramento Ephemera Collection consists of printed material produced by Sacramento businesses, chambers of commerce, sports teams, schools, government agencies, theaters and clubs. A range of formats includes tickets, programs, leaflets, advertisements, cards, letters, invoices and other forms of ephemeral material. Physical location: For current information on the location of these materials, please contact the Sacramento Room. Languages: Languages represented in the collection: English Access Collection is open for research. Publication Rights Use of the described materials may be subject to U.S. and international copyright laws. Permission for publication is given on behalf of the Sacramento Public Library as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained by the reader.
    [Show full text]
  • Delta Narratives: Saving the Historical and Cultural Heritage of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
    Delta Narratives: Saving the Historical and Cultural Heritage of The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Delta Narratives: Saving the Historical and Cultural Heritage of The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta A Report to the Delta Protection Commission Prepared by the Center for California Studies California State University, Sacramento August 1, 2015 Project Team Steve Boilard, CSU Sacramento, Project Director Robert Benedetti, CSU Sacramento, Co-Director Margit Aramburu, University of the Pacific, Co-Director Gregg Camfield, UC Merced Philip Garone, CSU Stanislaus Jennifer Helzer, CSU Stanislaus Reuben Smith, University of the Pacific William Swagerty, University of the Pacific Marcia Eymann, Center for Sacramento History Tod Ruhstaller, The Haggin Museum David Stuart, San Joaquin County Historical Museum Leigh Johnsen, San Joaquin County Historical Museum Dylan McDonald, Center for Sacramento History Michael Wurtz, University of the Pacific Blake Roberts, Delta Protection Commission Margo Lentz-Meyer, Capitol Campus Public History Program, CSU Sacramento Those wishing to cite this report should use the following format: Delta Protection Commission, Delta Narratives: Saving the Historical and Cultural Heritage of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, prepared by the Center for California Studies, California State University, Sacramento (West Sacramento: Delta Protection Commission, 2015). Those wishing to cite the scholarly essays in the appendix should adopt the following format: Author, "Title of Essay", in Delta Protection Commission, Delta Narratives: Saving the Historical and Cultural Heritage of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, prepared by the Center for California Studies, California State University, Sacramento (West Sacramento: Delta Protection Commission, 2015), appropriate page or pages. Cover Photo: Sign installed by Discover the Delta; art by Marty Stanley; Photo taken by Philip Garone.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Vista Museum Newsletter
    RIO VISTA MUSEUM NEWSLETTER www.riovistamuseum.org June 2019 Inaugural Mad Hatter’s Tea Party Big Success Our first fundraiser of the year was our Mad Hatter's Tea Party which was held on Saturday, April 27. It was truly fun for all ages! We started with a walk through the rabbit hole led by two of the cutest Alices ever, Sarah Call and Cali Slonski. Along with games, a photo booth, and lots of prizes, it was a huge success, and we are already looking forward to next year. There are so many people to thank: Birdtown Designs/Cindy Stewart, Brian Crane, California Endive Farms, Catherine Schultz, Chris Carter, Christy Ricketts, Delta Pharmacy, DNL Creations, Fran & Chris Seegmiller, Geraldine Naughton, Janet Blegen, Kathy Meers, Lira's, Marianne Aleck, Mary Anne Peterson, Petals on Main, Pets4All, Pizza Factory, Renee Tingey, Rio Gift & Souvenir, Rio Vista Muffler, and Tiffany Call for raffle and door prizes. We are grateful to those who lent us their items. Last, but not least, none of this would have been possible without the committee members and servers: Christy and Jake Ricketts, Dana Lapp, Janet Blegen, Kathy and Zack Meers, Lora Farley, MaryAnne Peterson, and Renee Tingey. And a big thank you to all who attended! Annual Membership Meeting and Presentation The museum membership gathered at the museum on the evening of January 28. After the installation of new officers, the time was turned over to our guest speaker, Robert Benedetti, who gave a fascinating presentation on the waves of immigrants into the Sacramento Delta from 1850 to 1960.
    [Show full text]
  • Routes and Schedules
    Linda Budge Steve Hansen Jeff Harris Pat Hume Rick Jennings, II Patrick Kennedy Steve Miller Andy Morin Don Nottoli Jay Schenirer Phil Serna Service Changes This book includes service change updates effective since the publication of the September 2015 Bus & Light Rail Timetable Book. The changes are as follows: Service with Schedule and/or Route Changes: 28, 51, 54 (6/16), 72, 80, 81, 84, 205, 206, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 226 (9/16), 227 (9/16), 228, 246, 248, 252, 255, McClellan Park Shuttle and Rancho CordoVan Route and schedule changes are implemented periodically and typically occur in January, April, June and September. Service change summaries are posted online at sacrt.com prior to implementation and passengers are encouraged to check for updated timetables. 1 Subject Index 24-Hour Automated Information Line ........................3 Monthly Passes .....................................................6-7 Accessible Services ...........................................26-27 Neighborhood Ride ...................87, 92, 132, 150-153 Alert SacRT ............................................................45 North Natomas Flyer ....................................156-160 Bike-and-Ride & Lockers ..................................21, 65 Notice and Complaint Procedures .....................28-31 Bus Route Maps & Timetables ........................46-149 RT Tracker/RT Mobile Site .................................3, 61 Capital City Hospital Shuttles ........................165-166 Online Sales .......................................................7,
    [Show full text]
  • University of California-Davis, the Transcontinental Railroad
    Narrative Section of a Successful Proposal The attached document contains the narrative and selected portions of a previously funded grant application. It is not intended to serve as a model, but to give you a sense of how a successful proposal may be crafted. Every successful proposal is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the program guidelines at http://www.neh.gov/grants/education/landmarks-american-history- and-culture-workshops-school-teachers for instructions. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Education Programs staff well before a grant deadline. The attachment only contains the grant narrative and selected portions, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: The Transcontinental Railroad: Transforming California and the Nation Institution: University of California, Davis Project Directors: Eric Rauchway and Ari Kelman Grant Program: Landmarks of American History and Culture Workshops 400 7th Street, S.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20506 P 202.606.8500 F 202.606.8394 E [email protected] www.neh.gov The Transcontinental Railroad: Transforming California and the Nation The History Project at University of California, Davis, in partnership with California State Parks (including the California State Railroad Museum, Old Sacramento State Historic Park and the Leland Stanford Mansion State Historic Park), the Historic Old Sacramento Foundation, Crocker Art Museum, and Stanford University seeks $180,000 to fund two, week-long Landmarks of American History and Culture workshops for teachers in 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • David L. Joslyn Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8cr618s No online items Guide to the David L. Joslyn papers Julie Dominguez and Judith Ann Lewinski Center for Sacramento History 551 Sequoia Pacific Blvd. Sacramento, California 95811-0229 Phone: (916) 808-7072 Fax: (916) 264-7582 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.centerforsacramentohistory.org/ © 2013 Center for Sacramento History. All rights reserved. Guide to the David L. Joslyn MS0056 1 papers Guide to the David L. Joslyn papers Collection number: MS0056 Center for Sacramento History Sacramento, CA Processed by: Julie Dominguez and Judith Ann Lewinski Date Completed: 1979 Encoded by: Sean Heyliger © 2013 Center for Sacramento History. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: David L. Joslyn papers Dates: circa 1850-1963 Bulk Dates: 1875-1948 Collection number: MS0056 Creator: Joslyn, David L. Collection Size: 2.5 linear feet(2 boxes) Repository: Center for Sacramento History Sacramento, California 95811-0229 Abstract: The David L. Joslyn papers consist of photographs and manuscripts mostly documenting Joslyn's work as a photographer and his early memories of living in Sacramento, California. Most of the photographs were taken by David Joslyn during the 1920's while he was an employee of the Southern Pacific Railroad. Therefore, many of the photos deal with the Southern Pacific and Central Pacific Railroad Lines. Some of the photographs are copied from earlier photos, drawings and lithographs. Joslyn also took numerous photographs of the State Capitol and the surrounding park as well as many shots from rooftops around the area of downtown Sacramento. These photographs are invaluable when searching for specific locations or businesses in early 20th century Sacramento.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Ephemera Collection SF SUB COLL
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt2p30342b No online items Finding Aid to the San Francisco Ephemera Collection SF SUB COLL Finding aid prepared by David Krah, Stephanie Walls, and California Ephemera Project staff; updated by San Francisco History Center staff. The California Ephemera Project was funded by a Cataloging Hidden Special Collections and Archives grant from the Council on Library and Information Resources in 2009-2010. San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library 100 Larkin Street San Francisco, CA 94102 [email protected] URL: http://www.sfpl.org/sfhistory 2010, revised January 2020 Finding Aid to the San Francisco SF SUB COLL 1 Ephemera Collection SF SUB COLL Title: San Francisco ephemera collection Date (inclusive): 1850-present Identifier/Call Number: SF SUB COLL Physical Description: 265.0 Linear feet(in 153 file drawers) Contributing Institution: San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library 100 Larkin Street San Francisco, CA 94102 415-557-4567 [email protected] URL: http://sfpl.org/sfhistory Abstract: Consists of ephemeral materials, city records and clippings relating to the city of San Francisco and its citizens. Materials date from the 1850s to the present, the bulk from the 20th century. Subjects cover a diverse array of San Francisco history and primarily pertain to: municipal government; city planning; urban policy; environmental engineering; transportation; social history; labor history; community relations; notable events; public events, fairs and celebrations; and various aspects of local popular culture. Subjects also relate to specific local entities, such as: businesses; schools, colleges and universities; political parties; and associations, groups and clubs.
    [Show full text]
  • Index-1966.Pdf
    2 administered trine Metal ^nflsB tw^^t^tanMBM^ttma*^ ^H ^mmm)ttmmm\^mMrV\,9^* .jrepernesZ Jan 1, 1966 contents page 1 Summary of areas administered by the National Park Service 1 Areas administered by the National Park Service (alphabetical listing) 26 Authorized areas for which lands have not been acquired 28 National Historic Sites not owned by the Federal Government 29 Authorized areas which the National Park Service will not administer 30 Sites declared eligible for the National Registry of Natural Landmarks 31 Sites declared eligible for the Registry of National Historic Landmarks 44 Areas administered by the National Park Service (by category) SUMMARY OF AREAS ADMINISTERED BY THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE [Note: See page 44 for list of areas by category] LANDS WITHIN EX­ CATEGORY NUMBER FEDERAL LAND TERIOR BOUNDARIES TOTAL LANDS WITHIN (ACRES) NOT FEDERALLY EXTERIOR BOUND­ OWNED (ACRES) ARIES (ACRES) NATIONAL PARKS 32 13,619,099.36 207,068.32 13,826, 167.68 NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARKS 10 33,358.91 6, 259. 74 39,618.65 NATIONAL MONUMENTS 77 8,941,778.02 121,209. 13 9,062,987.15 NATIONAL MILITARY PARKS il 29,367.63 2,570.00 31,937.63 NATIONAL MEMORIAL PARK 1 69,000.34 1,435.66 70,436.00 NATIONAL BATTLEFIELDS 5 2,733.01 1,4%. 35 4,229.36 NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARKS 4 7,162. 76 2,105.29 9,268.05 NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD SITES 780.04 5.83 785. 87 NATIONAL HISTORIC SITES 23* 3,088. 95 281.56 3,370. 51 NATIONAL MEMORIALS 16 5,319.80 206.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification
    Form No 10-300 (Rev 10-74) ^^ UNITED STATES DEP/fRlVlENTOE THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES ftlEpllVtCJ INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS NAME HISTORIC "Big Four" House AND/OR COMMON "BigFour" House [LOCATION STREETS, NUMBER (no number) North side of I Street between Front and Second Streets _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Sacramento . VICINITY OF MUL STATE CODE COUNTY CODE California 06 Sacramento 067 CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _DISTRICT X. PUB LIC —OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM X-BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE ^-UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH XXWORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT —IN PROCESS X-YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL _TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY MOTHER work in ___________ ___progress OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation STREETS NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE Sacramento _ VICINITY OF California HLOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, County Recorder's Office REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC. STREET* NUMBER 901 G Street (P. 0. Box 1206) CITY. TOWN STATE Sacramento California Q REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE DATE —FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY. TOWN STATE DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED _ ORIGINAL SITE XGOOD RUINS JSALTERED X.MOVED DATf 1966 —FAIR __UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Leland Stanford, Collis Huntington, and Mark Hopkins built three adjacent stores for themselves in 1852, at 220-226 K Street in Sacramento. The simple, two-storey brick commercial-style buildings were originally separate, but with the union of the three in the railroad venture, the buildings were united into one structure also.
    [Show full text]