So Much to Learn: Dye Tracing the Current River Landscape, Part III | the Confluence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

So Much to Learn: Dye Tracing the Current River Landscape, Part III | the Confluence spring/summer ’19 pg. 13 SO MUCH TO LEARN: It rained hard a few days before Anne Dye Tracing the Current Keller injected dye into the Halbrook Branch of Upper Gladden Creek in the Meramec River Landscape, Part III headwaters. She estimated that it was running at about 75 gallons per minute over a low water bridge in Dent County. A half-mile downstream by quinta scott of her injection point, the stream dried out and remained dry for several miles. She recovered her packets from Welch Spring with positive results.1 Tuesday November 10, 1818: It was Henry Rowe Schoolcraft Millions of years ago the the edge of a prairie where we had described the progression of Ozarks region was a peneplain, halted. Wood was rather scarce; but landscapes in the eastern Current a relatively flat plateau, across we made shift to build a good fire. River watershed in the journal he which the rivers the Meramec, kept as he explored the Ozarks the Current, the Gasconade, Wednesday November 11, 1818: In in 1818 and 1819. He began his and others meandered. At passing two miles, we crossed a small tour in Potosi; traveled south least 320,000,000 years ago, stream running south-east, which through the Cortois and Huzzah maybe more recently, a slow uplift evidently had its source in the little valleys; crossed the West Fork of pushed up the plain. The rivers lake at our last night’s encampment. the Black River to the headwater responded by cutting deep val- Welch Spring: Halbrook The trail beyond this was often faint; streams of the Meramec; crossed leys, maintaining their meanders Branch of Upper Gladden upland savannas pockmarked by and leaving behind remnants of Creek-Meramec Headwaters in the course of eight or ten miles, we began to ascend elevations covered little lakes (sinkholes); entered the peneplain—Schoolcraft’s with pines, but of so sterile and hard the forested lands that clothe prairies—on ridges between a soil that we lost all trace of it. We the valleys of Current River watersheds. All are relatively level wound about among those desolate tributaries; and descended plains, where local relief is seldom pine ridges a mile or two, till, from through their sheer valleys to the more than 100 feet. Sinkholes one of the higher points, we descried river itself. He crossed the river litter all. Some deliver water to a river in a deep valley, having a just south of Montauk Spring. underground systems. Major dense forest of hard wood, and every Schoolcraft described the tributaries to the Current, Big indication of animal life. Overjoyed Current River landscape of 1818 in and Spring Valley creeks, which at this, we mended our pace, and, by much the same way the Missouri are also losing streams, head at the dint of great caution, led our pack- Department of Conservation barren (prairie) edge and deliver horse into it. It proved to be the river (MDC) would describe it in 2002 water to springs. In Schoolcraft’s Currents, a fine stream, with fertile when it published its Atlas of time, stubby post oaks grew on banks, and clear sparkling waters. Missouri Ecoregions and defined it fragipan, poorly drained soils on - henry rowe schoolcraft, 18182 as the Current River Hills ecoregion. the ridges. Today, we find cattle grazing on fescue pastures. The MDC named such landscapes Oak Savanna/Woodland Plains. spring/summer ’19 pg. 14 On the process of selecting a dye injection site: pg. 15 “It is based on lots of field work and lots of walking the hollows of the Ozarks. It is a combination of art and science, and an ability to understand the land and how it functions.” The MDC described much as 250 feet. At the end River, Schoolcraft crossed narrow, the forested breaks remain intact. This is the last of a three-part The third part explores Schoolcraft’s “desolate pine of the nineteenth century, rugged ridges that dropped down Hardwoods covered the river series on our undetstanding of the Current River country, its ridges” as the Oak-Pine loggers moved in and stripped as much as 500 feet along steep floodplain, which is lined in tall Ozark National Scenic Riverways prairies, its losing tributaries, Woodland/Forest Hills, where the woodlands. Today, dense slopes, anchored by oaks, into bluffs. Huge springs, which draw in the Current River watershed and its springs. Again, Thomas the soil is cherty. Historically, a second-growth oak and or oak- the fertile Current River Valley. water from all parts of the since 1964. The first covered the Aley’s work guides us through woodland mix of oaks and pines pine forests dominate the hills. The MDC named this region the watershed, feed a steady stream establishment of the Ozark the landscape. In 1973 Aley covered the rolling hills, where Current River Oak Forest Breaks. of water to the river. 3 National Scenic Riverways and completed the Hurricane Creek the landscape rises and falls as As he approached the Current Unlike the oak/pine woodland, our early forays into understanding project, opened his Ozark its watershed. Research began Underground Laboratory at in 1912 when Thomas Jacob Protem, Missouri, and began Rodhouse measured the flow of working as a consultant on the Current above and below Big hydrogeology, caves, and the Spring and continues to this day. management of karst regions. One Between 1968 and 1973, Thomas of his first clients was the Ozark Aley conducted his study of the National Scenic Riverways, for Hurricane Creek watershed and whom he delineated the recharge delineated the extent of the areas of the springs that feed Big Spring Recharge area. The the Current River. Schoolcraft’s “desolate creek, a classic losing stream and pine ridges” a tributary of the Eleven Point River, delivers water through subterranean channels that run under the drainage divide between the Eleven Point and the Current to Big Spring, a tributary to the Current River. Aley’s conclusions focused on the interplay between land use on the surface and groundwater quality.4 Sunklands Conservation The second part discussed Area: the Doe Run applications to McHenry Hollow mine lead in the Hurricane Creek watershed and the explosion of research that followed. It Tom Aley described the focused on the efforts of the U.S. process of selecting a dye Geological Survey to map the injection site: “It is based on lots karst landscape of the Current of field work and lots of walking River watershed between 1995 the hollows of the Ozarks. It is and 2001. The project provided a a combination of art and science, geological inventory of the Ozark and an ability to understand National Scenic Riverways. the land and how it functions. The Missouri Department of Losing stream segments are often Conservation sorted out the ideal locations. They are best progression of landscapes in the when most or all of the flow of watershed, catalogued it its Atlas the stream is sinking in a very for Missouri’s Ecoregions, and localized area. This often means published maps in 2002. that you need to be there during or shortly after rainstorms. You spring/summer ’19 pg. 16 pg. 17 “No Dumping.” Montauk Spring Brook so said a sign at the sinkhole. don’t always guess right and may springs and assessed areas that disbursed and emerged from get to a point you have selected are hazardous to the water several smaller pools, gravel bars, only to find that conditions are quality of each spring. In a second and creek beds. Walk along not suitable. contract in 1977 and 1978 he the creek that emerges from delineated the recharge areas of the spring. “You will see water “You also need dye introduction springs north of the Jacks Fork springing from very small points that will give you as much and west of the Current. In 1982 ponds, from seeps, from its useful information as possible. Aley crossed the Current and gravel bed.” If you are concerned with began tracing the sources of protecting water quality, then a springs in its eastern watershed The sources of Montauk site downstream of a source of and north of U.S. 60. By the time Spring puzzled geologists for contaminated water is routinely he and Catherine Aley published decades. It puzzled geologists more useful than a site way out in their Groundwater Study: Ozark James Maxwell and David the woods somewhere. A site National Scenic Riverways in 1987, Hoffman. In the fall of 1971 the near the potential boundary they had conducted at least one pair toured the region east of between a couple of recharge trace of every major spring that Licking for their study of Water areas is more useful than a site feeds the Current. They included Resources of the Current River and where it is pretty obvious where a series of maps delineating the speculated on suitable places 5 the water is likely to go.” recharge areas for all major springs.6 where they could inject dye the following spring. They ruled In 1972 soon after the out Monty Spring, which spills dedication of the Ozark into a stream that cuts through a Montauk National Scenic Riverways in steep-sided hollow, where beaver and Welch Springs: 1971, the National Park Service had built a dam across the stream. results: positive, but very weakly “No Dumping.” So said a sign demonstration of the role of Bean Creek embarked on a series of studies They considered a huge sinkhole, positive. Aley considered, for the at the sinkhole; so said Tom Aley. sinkholes and losing streams in the Injection Site on management of the new park, 600 feet wide northeast of first time, that the springs in the Aley concluded his Hurricane contamination of groundwater including a groundwater study Licking, which drained Current River watershed share Creek study by noting: came in 1920 when the of the Current River watershed.
Recommended publications
  • September 2017 Volume 84, No. 3
    September 2017 Volume 84, No. 3 The Audubon Society of Missouri Missouri’s Ornithological Society Since 1901 The Audubon Society of Missouri Officers Regional Directors Mark Haas*+, President (2018) Charles Burwick+ (2017) 614 Otto Drive; Jackson MO 63755; Springfield (417) 860-9505 (573) 204-0626 Lottie Bushmann+ (2018) [email protected] Columbia, (573) 445-3942 Bill Eddleman*+, Vice-President Jeff Cantrell+ (2017) (2018); 1831 Ricardo Drive, Cape Neosho (471) 476-3311 Girardeau, MO 63701, (573) 335-1507, [email protected] Mike Doyen+ (2017) Rolla (573) 364-0020 Scott Laurent*+, Secretary (2017) 610 W. 46th Street, #103; Kansas City, Sherry Leonardo+ (2018) MO 64112; (816) 916-5014 Grandview (816) 763-1393 [email protected] Brent Galliart+ (2018) Pat Lueders*+, Treasurer (2017) St. Joseph (816) 232-6038 1147 Hawken Pl., St. Louis, MO Greg Leonard+ (2019) 63119; (314) 222-1711 Columbia (573) 443-8263 [email protected] Terry McNeely+ (2019) Honorary Directors Jameson, MO (660) 828-4215 Richard A. Anderson, St. Louis** Phil Wire+ (2019) Nathan Fay, Ozark** Bowling Green (314) 960-0370 Leo Galloway, St. Joseph** Jim Jackson, Marthasville Lisle Jeffrey, Columbia** Chairs Floyd Lawhon, St. Joseph** Bill Clark, Historian Patrick Mahnkey, Forsyth** 3906 Grace Ellen Dr. Rebecca Matthews, Springfield** Columbia, MO 65202 Sydney Wade, Jefferson City** (573) 474-4510 Dave Witten, Columbia** John Wylie, Jefferson City** Kevin Wehner, Membership Brad Jacobs, 2016 Recipient of the 510 Ridgeway Ave. Rudolf Bennitt Award Columbia, MO 65203 Jim Jackson, 2012 Recipient of the (573) 815-0352 [email protected] Rudolf Bennitt Award Dr. David Easterla, 2006 Recipient of the Rudolf Bennitt Award + Board Position * Executive Committee Member Paul E.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MSS LIAISON VOLUME 58 NUMBER 9-10 September - October 2018 AFFILIATE ORGANIZATIONS: CHOUTEAU-KCAG-LEG-LOG-MMV-MSM-MVG-OHG-PEG-RBX- SPG-SEMO-MCKC-CCC-CAIRN
    THE MSS LIAISON VOLUME 58 NUMBER 9-10 September - October 2018 AFFILIATE ORGANIZATIONS: CHOUTEAU-KCAG-LEG-LOG-MMV-MSM-MVG-OHG-PEG-RBX- SPG-SEMO-MCKC-CCC-CAIRN. Distributed free on the MSS website: http://www.mospeleo,org/ Subscription rate for paper copies is $10.00 per year. Send check or money order made out to the Missouri Speleological Survey to the Editor, Gary Zumwalt, 1681 State Route D, Lohman, MO 65053. Telephone: 573-782-3560. Missouri Speleological Survey President's Message October 2018. Despite the foreboding forecast of biblical rains, the Fall MSS meeting at Current River State Park was a great time. Before the weekend began, we had a long list of objectives and a sizable group of cavers expected to come, as well as ambitious plans for a large map and gear display for the public. Weathermen across the region however, conspired to keep people home with predictions of heavy rain throughout the weekend and flash flood warnings across the state. As the weekend drew nearer, the number of cavers bowing out increased by the day. Nevertheless, while it did rain all day Friday and poured on us during the drive down Friday night, the rest of the weekend was fairly dry and beautiful. The Current didn't rise, so one small group monitored caves via kayak and a much larger group went to Echo Bluff State Park to work on graffiti removal, left over the Camp Zoe events, as well as to perform a bio survey, per request of the park, to see whether the cave closure had any noticeable impact on the presence of cave life.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of Randolph County, Arkansas Steve M
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 31 Article 8 1977 Fishes of Randolph County, Arkansas Steve M. Bounds Arkansas State University John K. Beadles Arkansas State University Billy M. Johnson Arkansas State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Bounds, Steve M.; Beadles, John K.; and Johnson, Billy M. (1977) "Fishes of Randolph County, Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 31 , Article 8. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol31/iss1/8 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. ! Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 31 [1977], Art. 8 Fishes ofRandolph County, Arkansas STEVE M. BOUNDS,' JOHN K.BEADLESand BILLYM.JOHNSON Divisionof Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University I State University, Arkansas 72467 ! ABSTRACT Asurvey of the fishes of Randolph County in northcentral Arkansas was made between June 1973 and March 1977. Field collections, literature records, and museum specimens re- n vealed the ichthyofauna of Randolph County to be composed of 128 species distributed among 24 families.
    [Show full text]
  • HERITAGE Newsletter of the Missouri Parks Association Post Office Box 30036, Columbia, MO 65205
    HERITAGE Newsletter of the Missouri Parks Association Post Office Box 30036, Columbia, MO 65205 Volume 34, No. 2 August 2016 Susan Flader, Editor Parks, Soil and Water Tax on November 8 Ballot Renewal of the State tax revenue that had led to a Parks, Soil, and Water veritable renaissance of the Sales Tax is up for a vote park system by that time now of the citizenry at the gen- had to support basic opera- eral election November 8 tions of the parks with very as Amendment #1, and little left over for major re- supporters of the measure pairs and improvements. The are urging strong citizen result has been the buildup of support. a nearly $400 million backlog Amendment 1 asks: of infrastructure rehabilitation Shall Missouri continue for and other facility needs that 10 years the one-tenth of Governor Nixon and leaders of the Citizens Committee at the will have to be addressed one percent sales/use tax state fair August 18 discuss the benefits of the tax and the need through other means. that is used for soil and for its continuation. Missouri Farm Bureau photo. The sales tax is now more water conservation and for critical than ever, because it state parks and historic sites, and resub- five-year sunset on the tax. When cross- provides 75 percent of total park opera- mit this tax to the voters for approval in currents prevented action by the legisla- tions, with the other 25 percent coming 10 years? ture, the Citizens Committee had to mostly from fees for services like camp- mount an arduous initiative petition This is a continuation of a tax that ing, lodging, boat rentals, and the like.
    [Show full text]
  • A Legacy of Neglect: the Ozark National Scenic Riverways
    A Legacy of Neglect: The Ozark National Scenic Riverways Susan Flader Missouri’s Current River and its tributary, the Jacks Fork, were the nation’s first fed- erally protected rivers. Congressionally authorized in 1964 as the Ozark National Scenic Riverways (ONSR), they served as a prototype for the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968. But in May 2011 ONSR was identified by American Rivers as one of America’s ten most endangered rivers, owing to a history of inadequate management by the National Park Service (NPS). The spring-fed, bluff-lined Current and Jacks Fork are the preeminent “float streams” in a state where floating, fishing, and camping by johnboat or canoe have long been favorite pastimes (Figure 1). The state’s first Republican governor since Reconstruction, Herbert Hadley, led well-publicized float trips on Current River as early as 1909 in an effort to pro- mote tourism and build support for a state park system. When Missouri acquired its first state parks in 1924, they included Round Spring and Big Spring on the Current River and Alley Spring on the Jacks Fork. The rivers early attracted admirers from afar; Aldo Leopold came from Wisconsin in 1926 to float the Current from Van Buren to Doniphan with his brothers (Leopold 1953; Figure 2), then in 1929 bought a shanty on its bank as a base for annual hunts, years before he acquired his celebrated shack in the sand country of Wisconsin. Like many other rivers that eventually won designation as national wild and scenic rivers, the Current was threatened by proposed hydroelectric dams.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichthyofaunal Survey of the Current River Within Arkansas Joe F
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 28 Article 9 1974 Ichthyofaunal Survey of the Current River Within Arkansas Joe F. Green Arkansas State University John K. Beadles Arkansas State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Green, Joe F. and Beadles, John K. (1974) "Ichthyofaunal Survey of the Current River Within Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 28 , Article 9. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol28/iss1/9 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 28 [1974], Art. 9 Ichthyofaunal Survey ofthe Current River Within Arkansas JOE F. GREEN* and JOHN K. BEADLES Divisionof Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University, State University, Arkansas 72467 ABSTRACT Current River is a clear predominantly spring-fed stream draining the southeastern face of the Ozark escarpment. Beginning at Montauk Springs, Dent County, Missouri, it meanders southward for 180 km to the Arkansas-Missouri state line.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers: Revised November 2008; Caves: Revised July 2007; Trails: Revised March 2010; High Adventure: Revised September 2007
    Everything you need to know about more than 90 of the best camps in the region Including more than 60 High Adventure opportunities Images courtesy of: http://signal.baldwincity.com/news/2011/oct/20/local-boy-scouts-troop-remained-busy-during-summer/ http://i4.ytimg.com/vi/obn8RVY_szM/mgdefault.jpg http://www/sccovington.com/philmont/trek_info/equipment/tents.htm This is a publication of Tamegonit Lodge, the Order of the Arrow lodge affiliated with the Heart of America Council, BSA. Updated: December 2012 Additional copies of this publication are available through the Program Services Department at the Heart of America Council Scout Service Center 10210 Holmes Road Kansas City, Missouri 64131 Phone: (816) 942-9333 Toll Free: (800) 776-1110 Fax: (816) 942-8086 Online: www.hoac-bsa.org Camps: Revised December 2012; Rivers: Revised November 2008; Caves: Revised July 2007; Trails: Revised March 2010; High Adventure: Revised September 2007 HOAC – Order of the Arrow – ON THE LOOSE RIVERS – Page 1 Welcome to the adventures which the scenic rivers in southern Missouri offer. In the next pages many rivers are described, both in general and by specific sections. You will also find within this section a compilation of many public outfitters, which regularly provide all necessary equipment for a canoe trip. The river sections that are profiled are probably not the exact sections of river that you will float if you rent your canoes and equipment form an outfitter. Each outfitter has “normal” floats that you may choose from, and few, if any, of these floats will match with the sections profiled in On The Loose, or with the sections any other outfitter would float! After spending some time with the River Section of On The Loose, I feel that you will agree there are many more rivers, which can be floated than the ones commonly mentioned (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Confluence Is a Nonprofit Semi-Annual Publication of Lindenwood University, St
    A publication of Lindenwood University Press Spring/Summer 2019 vol. 10, no. 2 ®® pg. 1 Spring/Summer 2019 A publication of Lindenwood University Press vol. 10, no. 2 EDITORIAL BOARD STAFF CONTENTS Mark Abbott, harris stowe state university editor, Jeffrey E. Smith, PhD Steve Belko, missouri humanities council art director, Michael B. Thede pg. 13 Lorri Glover, saint louis university archivist, Paul Huffman Andrew Hurley, university of missouri-st. louis pg. 43 Meredith Marsh, lindenwood university SUBSCRIPTIONS Robert J. Moore, Jr., gateway arch national park pg. 3 Kristine Runberg Smith, lindenwood university ISSN 2150-2633 The Confluence is a nonprofit semi-annual publication of Lindenwood University, St. Charles, Missouri. Andrew Theising, southern illinois university edwardsville pg. 31 All rights reserved. and Lindenwood University Kenneth Winn The Confluence are not responsible for statements of fact or opinion expressed in signed contributions. Requests to reprint any part of ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Confluence should be sent to Editor, The Confluence, c/0 Lindenwood University, 209 South Kingshighway, St. Charles, An undertaking like The Confluence doesn’t happen without the help Missouri 63301, or via email to [email protected]. of many people, both within Lindenwood University and beyond. © Lindenwood University 2019 We owe particular thanks to Provost Marilyn Abbott and the Board of Trustees at Lindenwood for supporting this venture. We’d Manuscripts. Any manuscripts should be sent to Editor, like to take this opportunity to extend our gratitude to the following The Confluence, c/o Lindenwood University, 209 S. people, institutions, and companies for their contributions Kingshighway, St. Charles, Missouri 63301, or via e-mail to this issue of The Confluence; we could not have to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • CURRENT RIVER CAVE-IN Fall Meetings of the Missouri Speleological Survey and Missouri Caves and Karst Conservancy Current River State Park September 7-9, 2018
    THE MSS LIAISON VOLUME 58 NUMBER 5-6 May - June 2018 AFFILIATE ORGANIZATIONS: CHOUTEAU-KCAG-LEG-LOG-MMV-MSM-MVG-OHG-PEG-RBX- SPG-SEMO-MCKC-CCC-CAIRN. Distributed free on the MSS website: http://www.mospeleo,org/ Subscription rate for paper copies is $10.00 per year. Send check or money order made out to the Missouri Speleological Survey to the Editor, Gary Zumwalt, 1681 State Route D, Lohman, MO 65053. Telephone: 573-782-3560. CURRENT RIVER CAVE-IN Fall meetings of the Missouri Speleological Survey and Missouri Caves and Karst Conservancy Current River State Park September 7-9, 2018 Join us at this historic site for a weekend of cave education, restoration, monitoring, and survey. The Alton Club was built in the late 1930’s and served as a corporate retreat for 50 years before being purchased by the state of Missouri. This cluster of buildings and associated recreational structures is now listed on the National Register of Historic Sites. Cave activities include: restoration and monitoring of caves at Echo Bluff State Park, public education at Echo Bluff and Current River State Parks, cave monitoring along the Current River, cave map and poster display, cave survey, cave files and cartography help desks, bat flight watch, and more. This is a public event and our main goal is public interpretation of how cavers promote cave conservation. 1 Most of these activities will be scheduled for Saturday. Organization meetings are scheduled for Sunday morning. Cave map display and organizational booths will be in the historic gymnasium. A limited number of NPS canoes will be available for canoe monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri State Parks 21 for ‘21 Challenge
    Missouri State Parks 21 for ‘21 Challenge Long before statehood, Missouri’s natural resources formed into livable, sustainable landscapes for animals and humans. These landscapes would eventually become the main features for many of our Missouri State Parks. Explore unique natural wonders, learn about native peoples, and experience Missouri as people 200 years ago would have. Listed here are 21 parks and sites to explore in 2021. The Missouri State Parks 21 for ‘21 Challenge is sponsored by Missouri State Parks, a division of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources. Missouri State Parks preserves and interprets the state's most outstanding natural landscapes and cultural landmarks, and provides outstanding recreational opportunities compatible with those resources. The state park system includes 91 state parks and historic sites plus the trails at Roger Pryor Pioneer Backcountry. The system includes sites that preserve the archaeological record of indigenous people that lived in the region long before Missouri became a state; homes of famous Missourians and Civil War battlefields; and reminders of yesterday such as gristmills and covered bridges. The state's most outstanding landscapes are also preserved for everyone's enjoyment – deep forests, glades, prairies and blue streams and lakes. There is something for everyone at Missouri State Parks! Missouri State Parks 21 for ‘21 Challenge … Visit at least 5 sites. Remember: Missouri Explorers must be registered in the program, and they are responsible for checking hours and availability of sites. Upload your verification photographs using the online submission form at https://missouri2021.org/missouri-explorers/ to receive your merit badge button. Remember, Missouri Explorers, you are responsible for checking hours and availability of sites before arriving.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Traffic Crashes Rank-Order County Listing 2016 - 2018
    Missouri Traffic Crashes Rank-Order County Listing 2016 - 2018 Rank County Total Crashes % 1 ST. LOUIS 94,667 20.2 2 JACKSON 72,687 15.5 3 ST. LOUIS CITY 45,393 9.7 4 ST. CHARLES 26,275 5.6 5 GREENE 18,086 3.9 6 CLAY 17,392 3.7 7 JEFFERSON 14,369 3.1 8 JASPER 8,586 1.8 9 CAPE GIRARDEAU 8,032 1.7 10 FRANKLIN 7,885 1.7 11 BUCHANAN 7,849 1.7 12 PLATTE 7,299 1.6 13 BOONE 7,058 1.5 14 CASS 6,073 1.3 15 COLE 4,682 1.0 16 TANEY 4,611 1.0 17 PHELPS 4,296 .9 18 ST. FRANCOIS 3,985 .8 19 BUTLER 3,925 .8 20 CHRISTIAN 3,813 .8 21 NEWTON 3,666 .8 22 PETTIS 3,615 .8 23 CALLAWAY 3,200 .7 24 JOHNSON 3,171 .7 25 LACLEDE 3,075 .7 26 CAMDEN 2,706 .6 27 PULASKI 2,627 .6 28 LINCOLN 2,617 .6 29 SCOTT 2,613 .6 30 WARREN 2,474 .5 31 HOWELL 2,383 .5 32 MARION 2,366 .5 33 LAWRENCE 2,124 .5 34 LAFAYETTE 2,095 .4 35 WEBSTER 1,931 .4 36 BARRY 1,877 .4 37 STONE 1,703 .4 38 RANDOLPH 1,649 .4 39 DUNKLIN 1,630 .3 40 POLK 1,619 .3 41 STODDARD 1,606 .3 42 SALINE 1,593 .3 43 CRAWFORD 1,574 .3 44 MILLER 1,518 .3 45 PEMISCOT 1,463 .3 46 NEW MADRID 1,458 .3 47 PERRY 1,432 .3 48 AUDRAIN 1,316 .3 49 COOPER 1,308 .3 50 MCDONALD 1,303 .3 51 TEXAS 1,284 .3 52 HENRY 1,248 .3 53 WASHINGTON 1,206 .3 54 VERNON 1,201 .3 55 MORGAN 1,169 .2 Rank County Total Crashes % 56 NODAWAY 1,103 .2 57 RAY 1,053 .2 58 STE.
    [Show full text]
  • Current River Watershed and Inventory Assessment
    Current River Watershed and Inventory Assessment, January 2003 Prepared by Thomas F. Wilkerson Jr., Fisheries Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation, West Plains, Missouri Table of Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 6 Location .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Geology ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Physiographic Region ............................................................................................................... 11 Soils .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Geology and Karst .................................................................................................................... 12 Stream Order, Mileage and Permanency .................................................................................. 13 Drainage Area ........................................................................................................................... 14 Stream Channel Gradient .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]