Core Strategy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Core Strategy South Lakeland Local Development Framework Core Strategy ADOPTED 20 OCTOBER 2010 Lawrence Conway, Chief Executive, South Lakeland District Council www.southlakeland.gov.uk/ldf Alternative formats of this document are available by calling 01539 733333 ext.7102 South Lakeland Local Development Framework Core Strategy Foreword South Lakeland’s superb natural setting shapes the district’s image and plays a major role in its development, making it a very attractive location for residents and visitors alike. However, while the district can offer a quality of life that is second to none, it does experience problems common to many rural areas. There is a need to deliver more balanced communities and reduce inequality, including reducing dependency on high-level services and jobs in towns outside the district, increasing provision of affordable housing and developing and maintaining high-quality modern sustainable transport networks. The challenge is to secure a sustainable level and pattern of development that creates balanced communities and meets local needs whilst protecting the environment that makes the district special. The Core Strategy document sets out the development strategy for South Lakeland outside the National Park areas up to 2025. It is a long-term plan. It draws together strategies of the council and other organisations whose activities have implications for the development and use of land. It puts the aspirations of the Sustainable Community Strategy into effect – seeking to create a sustainable district that is the best possible place to live, work and visit. The Core Strategy is a document which forms part of the South Lakeland Local Development Framework (LDF). The LDF is a series of documents which will eventually replace the South Lakeland Local Plan that was adopted in 1997 and the Alterations to the Local Plan adopted in 2006. The LDF will consider how the District (outside the two National Parks) will develop over the next fifteen years and will form part of the statutory Development Plan for the District. The Core Strategy does not set out site-specific proposals or allocations; rather it looks at the broad locations for delivering new development such as for housing, employment, transport, retail, public services etc. The delivery of the Core Strategy will require a partnership approach. It involves other organisations and groups who will work within the framework of their own strategies and plans as well as the spatial plan for the District – the LDF. Evidence of how well the policies in the Core Strategy are being achieved against clear targets set out within the Monitoring and Implementation Framework is highlighted in the Annual Monitoring Report. The Core Strategy has resulted in some minor changes needing to be made to the 2006 Local Plan Proposals Map. These changes relate to the inclusion of an inset map showing the boundary of the Kendal Canal Head Area Action Plan as well as the removal of settlement boundaries relating to those settlements not identified as a Principal, Key or Local Service Centre. Further amendments to the Proposals Map will be required when other Development Plan Documents are published, primarily the Allocations of Land DPD. Cllr Peter Thornton Housing and Development Portfolio Holder Foreword i SouthSouth Lakeland Local Local Development Development Framework Framework ProposedCore Strategy Submission Document Contents Section Policy Sub Section Page Number 1. Introduction Spatial portrait – South Lakeland today... 1 Key issues 7 South Lakeland tomorrow… 9 Strategic objectives – how we will get there… 11 2. The Development Strategy CS1.1 Sustainable development principles 15 for South Lakeland CS1.2 The development strategy 17 3. Spatial Strategy for Kendal Kendal today… 26 Key issues 30 Kendal tomorrow… 31 CS2 How we will get there… 32 4. Spatial Strategy for Ulverston Ulverston and Furness today… 40 Key issues 44 Ulverston and Furness tomorrow… 45 CS3.1 How we will get there… 46 CS3.2 Ulverston Canal Head and corridor 46 5. Spatial Strategy for Cartmel Cartmel Peninsula today… 55 Peninsula Key issues 58 Cartmel Peninsula tomorrow… 57 CS4 How we will get there… 60 6. Spatial Strategy for the East The East (including Milnthorpe 65 (including Milnthorpe and Kirkby Lonsdale) today… and Kirkby Lonsdale) Key issues 69 The East (including Milnthorpe 69 and Kirkby Lonsdale) tomorrow… CS5 How we will get there… 70 CORE POLICIES 7. Housing CS6.1 Meeting the housing requirement 76 CS6.2 Dwelling mix and type 79 CS6.3 Provision of affordable housing 81 CS6.4 Rural exception policy 82 CS6.5a Gypsies and Travellers 83 CS6.5b Travelling Showpeople 84 CS6.6 Making effective and efficient use of land 85 and buildings ii Contents South Lakeland Local Development Framework Core Strategy Contents Section Policy Sub Section Page Number 8. Jobs, Skills and Regeneration Land for jobs and business 86 CS7.1 Meeting the employment requirement 88 CS7.2 Type of employment land required 89 and sectoral split CS7.3 Education and skills 90 CS7.4 Rural economy 92 CS7.5 Town centre and retail strategy 95 CS7.6 Tourism development 96 CS7.7 Opportunities provided by energy 97 and the low carbon economy 9. Quality Environment CS8.1 Green infrastructure 98 CS8.2 Protection and enhancement 99 of landscape and settlement character CS8.3a Accessing open space, sport and recreation 100 CS8.3b Quantity of open space, sport and recreation 101 CS8.4 Biodiversity and geodiversity 102 CS8.5 Coast 103 CS8.6 Historic environment 103 CS8.7 Sustainable construction, energy efficiency 107 and renewable energy CS8.8 Development and flood risk 108 CS8.9 Minerals and waste 109 CS8.10 Design 110 10. Health and Wellbeing CS9.1 Social and community infrastructure 111 CS9.2 Developer contributions 113 11. Accessing Services CS10.1 Accessing services 115 CS10.2 Transport impact of new development 116 APPENDICES Appendix 1 Monitoring and Implementation Framework 117 Appendix 2 Local Plan Policies Replaced by the Core Strategy 157 Appendix 3 Glossary 165 Contents iii South Lakeland Local Development Framework Core Strategy iv South Lakeland Local Development Framework Core Strategy Section 1 – Introduction Spatial portrait – South Lakeland today… 1.1 South Lakeland district lies in the southernmost part of Cumbria between the districts of Lancaster, Craven and Richmondshire to the south and east, and the Cumbrian districts of Eden, Barrow-in- Furness, Copeland and Allerdale to the north, south west and west. 1.2 This Core Strategy covers those areas of South Lakeland outside the Lake District and Yorkshire Dales National Park areas, whose authorities will produce their own Core Strategies. The area covered by the South Lakeland Core Strategy is shown on the map below. Figure 1 - The area covered by this Core Strategy 1.3 The area covered by this Core Strategy can be split into: • Kendal and its Rural Hinterland1 to the east • Ulverston and Furness to the west • Cartmel Peninsula to the south 1.4 The total population of the area of South Lakeland District is around 105,000, with over a quarter of local residents being older than working age. The population is projected to grow to around 117,000 by 2026, during which time it is expected that the number of children and young people will decrease with an increase in the proportion of retired people in the area. 1 For the purpose of this document, the rural hinterland of Kendal will be referred to as The East (including Milnthorpe and Kirkby Lonsdale) Section 1 – Introduction 1 South Lakeland Local Development Framework Core Strategy 1.5 Kendal is the main town in the Core Strategy area. It is located in the southeast and accounts for 38 per cent of the total population. Ulverston, in Furness, is the second largest town, with 15 per cent of the population. Both are Key Services Centres – places that provide things such as jobs, shops and leisure facilities for many people in the surrounding areas. 1.6 Grange-over-Sands, Kirkby Lonsdale and Milnthorpe are smaller settlements that also act as Key Service Centres. Together they make up 12 per cent of the total population. 1.7 The rest of the population lives in villages and hamlets scattered across the countryside. Some of these act as Local Service Centres, which are like Key Service Centres but offer fewer services. Figure 2 - Population density The economy 1.8 South Lakeland has low unemployment compared to other authorities in Cumbria. Business survival rates are high. Kendal College and the newly formed University of Cumbria, which has a number of sites across Cumbria (but not within the area), provide further and higher education for local residents. 1.9 The area also provides economic opportunities for communities in the neighbouring National Parks, where there are more constraints on development. Kendal and Ulverston in particular are well located to cater for the needs of a large number of residents within the Lake District National Park without them having to travel long distances to work. 1.10 Tourism is successful, but many jobs in the sector have relatively low pay. Young people who leave the area for higher education often do not return. Those residents who are well-qualified commonly have to travel outside the district for work. Travel-to-work patterns show that more people travel out of South Lakeland than into South Lakeland for employment – with workers commuting as far as Manchester and Warrington. 2 Section 1 – Introduction South Lakeland Local Development Framework Core Strategy 1.11 The number of young people leaving the area, together with the heavy reliance on tourism, causes communities to become unbalanced. Regeneration becomes more difficult. 1.12 Some communities in South Lakeland face other, specific economic challenges. Ulverston is having to adapt to the changing business plans of major employers such as GlaxoSmithKline.
Recommended publications
  • THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION for ENGLAND Farm O P Violet Pit (Dis) Pond D
    SHEET 9, MAP 9 Proposed electoral division boundaries in Barrow-in-Furness borough Pond A Ethel Pit 5 9 (dis) 5 Sandscale Haws (Nature Reserve) Roanhead Housethwaite Peggy Pit Iron Mines Pond Hill (dis) South Lakes (disused) 90 Pond Wild Animal Park 5 k A c e B Chapel Hills a Sandscale k a THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Farm o P Violet Pit (dis) Pond D i s DALTON NORTH ED nel m n ELECTORAL REVIEW OF CUMBRIA ll l Tu a Gi inda n Pit No 2 agg L t H l (17) e (dis) d Ponds Tip R a i l w ASKAM AND IRELETH CP Gill a Dub Nursery Final recommendations for electoral division y boundaries in DALTON NORTH WARD Maidenlands Elliscales P Rickett Quarry the county of Cumbria July 2012 Quarry o Hills a LINDAL AND MARTON CP Pond k (dis) (dis) a B e c Maidenlands Sheet 9 of 9 k Hawthwaite 'S N Farm House E Re L Elliscale Farm d Gutter E H T S Allotment Allotment HA Gardens Sports WTHWAITE Gardens LANE D Field D A A O O R R N O M T Our Lady of G A H This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of K George Romney G o S U The Rosary RC l d A Junior School O the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. m R Primary School B i r Golf e T Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document
    • Herefordshire O Council Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document April 2008 0 0 hfdscouncil herefordshire.gov.uk Contents Page Summary 1 Part 1 Context 5 1.1 Purpose of Supplementary Planning Document 5 1.2 Consultation 5 1.3 Definitions and Purpose of Planning Obligations 6 1.4 Types and Use of Planning Obligations 6 1.5 Grampian Conditions 7 1.6 Planning Policy Context 7 1.7 Council Priorities 8 1.8 Community Involvement in Pre-Application Consultation 9 1.9 Sustainability Appraisal 9 Part 2 Code Of Practice 10 2.1 The Council’s Approach 10 2.2 Procedure for Negotiating a Planning Obligation 10 2.3 Monitoring 12 2.4 Development Viability 12 2.5 Management 12 Part 3 Community Infrastructure 15 3.1 Accessibility, Transport and Movement 15 3.2 Affordable Housing See Affordable Housing SPD 2021 20 3.3 Biodiversity 24 3.4 Community Services 26 3.5 Children and Young People 29 3.6 Flood Risk Management, Water Services and Pollution Control 33 3.7 Heritage and Archaeology 34 3.8 Landscape 35 3.9 Open Space, Sports and Recreation Facilities 36 3.10 Town Centres, Community Safety and Public Realm 42 3.11 Waste Reduction and Recycling 45 Appendices 46 1 UDP Policies 46 2 Average Occupancy per Dwelling 47 3 Employee/Floorspace Ratios 48 4 Costs of Providing CCTV 49 Figures S1 Thresholds for Planning Obligations 1 S2 Summary Table of Planning Obligations 4 1 Procedure for Negotiating, Preparing and Completing a Planning Obligation 14 2 Example of Transport Contributions 18 3 Transport Accessibility Zones 19 4 Commuted Payments for
    [Show full text]
  • DC and R Report
    DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AND REGULATION COMMITTEE 26 August 2015 A report by the Assistant Director of Environment & Regulatory Services _____________________________________________________________________ Application No: 5/15/9005 District: South Lakeland Applicant: Lafarge Tarmac Ltd Parish: Urswick Fell Bank, Birtley, Chester Le Street Received: 31 MarchChester-le-Street 2015 PROPOSAL: Section 73 application to amend Condition 1 of planning permission 5/05/9013 to allow additional time to complete mineral extraction in the deep extension part of the quarry. LOCATION: Stainton Quarry, Long Lane, Stainton with Adgarley, Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria, LA13 0NN _____________________________________________________________________ 1.0 RECOMMENDATION 1.1 That planning permission is Granted for the reasons stated in Appendix 1 and subject to the conditions in Appendix 2. 2.0 THE PROPOSAL 2.1 This application seeks planning permission to extend the time limit for the extraction of high purity limestone from the deep extension area of Stainton Quarry for a further ten years until 31 March 2025, and thereby delay restoration of this area until 31 March 2026. 3.0 CONSULTATIONS AND REPRESENTATIONS 3.1 South Lakeland District Council’s Planning Department reports that it has no comments to make as regards the application. 3.2 Urswick Parish Council has no objections or comments. Dalton with Newtown Parish Council were also consulted however no reply had been received when this report was prepared. In the event a reply is received in advance of Committee this will be reported to Members on the update sheet. N.B. Dalton with Newton’s Parish boundary is in close proximity to the western boundary of the quarry and the deepening is located within the western side of the quarry.
    [Show full text]
  • Enjoyed by the Rev. John .Macauley, .MA, Who Resides A
    372 HISTORY OF FURNESS AND CARTMEL. the Duchy of Lancaster, is now worth about £1,093. per annum, and i~:~ enjoyed by the Rev. John .Macauley, .M.A., who resides at the rectory house, a pleasant dwelling near the church. The Rev. John Stonard, D.D., late rector, who died April 22nd, 1849, in the 81 st year of his age, was author of several works which evinced great talent and research. Bayrlijfo is a hamlet in Aldingham township, situate near the shore, five miles S. of Ulverston; Newbiggin is another hamlet in the same township, four miles S.E. of Dalton, and Rossbeck, another hamlet, four and a half miles S.S.E. of Dalton. Scales is a village in Aldingham, five miles S. of Ulverston. The hill called Scales haggs contains many large subterraneous eavities, in one of which some human skeletons have been found. Sunbreak is another small hamlet in this township, three and a half miles S. of Ulverston. GLEASTON township contains a village in a low situation, near a brook, two and a half miles S.E. of Dalton. The name is probably a contraction of Giasserton, which is derived from the British words, glas, green, er, fallow or ploughed land, and ton, a town or village. A little to the north-east of the village appear the venerable ruins of Gleaston Castle. whose shattered walls of massy thickness, and mouldering towers lighted by small apertures, demonstrate the design for which it was erected, and awaken in the mind "historical associations, contrasting widely with the calm and settled tran­ quillity of the present age.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakeland Life
    LAKELAND LIFE 1954-1960 Alan Macfarlane 1 Contents Preface 3 Arriving Moving North 5 First experience of the Lakes 9 A Home in the Lakes 14 The place and the people 23 Home Life 1955 36 1956 39 1957 51 1958 66 1959 70 1959 – Tour Round Europe 76 1960 90 Interlude between Sedbergh and Oxford 100 Lakeland Life Walking the dog 111 Motorbike freedom 121 Passion for fishing 124 Rock and skiffle 135 Dances and girlfriends 140 Searching for God and Jesus 154 Afterwards 163 Sedbergh and Lakes Timeline 164 2 Preface Lakeland Life is part of a series of books which I am writing which describe my early life and education. Indian Infancy covers the years in India from my birth in December 1941 to my return to England in 1947. Dorset Days and Dragon Days (with Jamie Bruce Lockhart) cover my life from 1947 to 1954 in Dorset and 1955 at the Dragon School. My own account of the Dragon experience is in Becoming a Dragon. Lakeland Life describes my home life in the Lake District from 1954 to 1960 and is paralleled by Sedbergh Schooldays, an account of my time at Sedbergh School in Yorkshire 1955-60. Later volumes will take the story on to Oxford University for six years and beyond. All of the volumes are principally based on contemporary documents, especially letters written by members of the family. This volume is based on several sets of letters, my mother’s to me and to my father (when she was away from him on home leave), my letters to my parents and my sister Fiona’s letters to my parents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chalet Bank Terrace, Bowness-On-Windermere, LA23 3BJ
    The Chalet Bank Terrace, Bowness-on-Windermere, LA23 3BJ Price £80,000 www.matthewsbenjamin.co.uk Ellerthwaite Square, Windermere, Cumbria LA23 1DU 015394 47717 015394 47617 [email protected] www.matthewsbenjamin.co.uk 'Locality' shall mean the administrative areas of the Parishes of: Located in the heart of Bowness-on-Windermere with a range of Broughton East; Cartmel Fell; Crook; Crosthwaite and Lyth; shops, restaurants and cafes right on the doorstep and plenty of Helsington; Kentmere; Lakes; Longsleddale; Skelwith; Staveley local amenities. Positioned on a private road just off the main in Cartmel; Staveley with Ings; Underbarrow and Bradleyfield; thorough through, a single storey dilapidated chalet sits on the site Upper Allithwaite; Windermere; Witherslack; Meathop and Ulpha; but has been granted permission to be demolished for the and those parts of the Parishes of Fawcett Forest; Strickland replacement dwelling. Ketel; Strickland Roger; and Whitwell and Selside which lie within the administrative area of the Lake District National Park. From our Windermere office proceed towards Bowness on the An 'Only or Principal Home' is a dwelling house which is New/Lake Road. Entering the shops passing the Cinema, the occupied continuously for a minimum period of six months in turning for Bank Terrace is opposite the car park and adjacent to every twelve month period. For the avoidance of doubt the Fat Olives brasserie. The chalet is the first property on the left hand dwelling shall not be occupied as a second home or for holiday side. letting accommodation. The development opportunity enables the existing chalet structure All mains services provided to the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Final DMP 2012-2014
    DESTINATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 2012 - 2014 Destination Management Plan: The Visitor Economy Action Plan for Cumbria 2012-14 Contents: Page: 3 1. Introduction 2. Process and Partnership 4 3. Strategic Framework 3.1 VisitEngland: A Strategic Framework for Tourism 2010-2020 5 3.2 The Tourism Strategy for Cumbria 2008-18, Making The Dream A Reality: 6 3.3 The 2030 Vision for the Lake District National Park 8 4. Tourism Volume and Value 4.1 Tourism in the UK 4.2 Tourism in the North West 4.3 Tourism in Cumbria 13 5. Industry Performance 5.1 Tourism Business Survey March 2012 15 5.2 Occupancy Surveys 16 5.3 Visitor Attractions 17 6. Consumer Trends and Market Forecasts 19 7. Tourism Challenges and Opportunities 20 7.1 VisitEngland Regional Growth Fund - Growing Tourism Locally 7.2 RDPE and the Rural Economy Grant 22 8. Targets and Performance Indicators 22 9. Future Investments and Plans - Priorities for Action 24 9.1 Major Tourism Investment Proposals 26 Tourism Investment Proposals - Details 26 1. Barrow and South Lakeland 35 2. Western Lakes 47 3. Eden 53 4. Carlisle and Hadrian’s Wall 61 Countywide/LDNPA 67 Appendix 1: Consultees 68 Appendix 2: Criteria for Appraisal and Prioritisation This Plan was prepared in association with Helen Tate of Red Research, [email protected] tel 07940 290682 2 Destination Management Plan: The Visitor Economy Action Plan for Cumbria 2012-14 1. Introduction Although prepared by Cumbria Tourism, The Destination Management Plan [DMP] is an action plan for all the public and private sector organisations involved in delivering the visitor experience in Cumbria [as distinct from the Business Plan of Cumbria Tourism].
    [Show full text]
  • Jubilee Digest Briefing Note for Cartmel and Furness
    Furness Peninsula Department of History, Lancaster University Victoria County History: Cumbria Project ‘Jubilee Digests’ Briefing Note for Furness Peninsula In celebration of the Diamond Jubilee in 2012, the Queen has decided to re-dedicate the VCH. To mark this occasion, we aim to have produced a set of historical data for every community in Cumbria by the end of 2012. These summaries, which we are calling ‘Jubilee Digests’, will be posted on the Cumbria County History Trust’s website where they will form an important resource as a quick reference guide for all interested in the county’s history. We hope that all VCH volunteers will wish to get involved and to contribute to this. What we need volunteers to do is gather a set of historical facts for each of the places for which separate VCH articles will eventually be written: that’s around 315 parishes/townships in Cumberland and Westmorland, a further 30 in Furness and Cartmel, together with three more for Sedbergh, Garsdale and Dent. The data included in the digests, which will be essential to writing future VCH parish/township articles, will be gathered from a limited set of specified sources. In this way, the Digests will build on the substantial progress volunteers have already made during 2011 in gathering specific information about institutions in parishes and townships throughout Cumberland and Westmorland. As with all VCH work, high standards of accuracy and systematic research are vital. Each ‘Jubilee Digest’ will contain the following and will cover a community’s history from the earliest times to the present day: Name of place: status (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Heritage of Barrow-In-Furness” G Rawlinson St
    5 CUSTOM HOUSE This building was originally beautiful building can be the Imperial Hotel and was clearly seen at roof level built by Thomas Medley in in the bold lettering which 1866. It is the only example reads: “CUSTOM HOUSE.” of Italianate architecture that can be found in the After years of careful town centre. restoration, the building was converted to a bar, there’s more heritAGE THAN MEETS THE EYE The building was sold in restaurant and leisure 1872, becoming a custom building for family activities. house and general post A choice of food is office until the early freshly prepared 1900’s. The heritage of this EXPLORING THE HERITAGE 3 RAMSDEN HALL 1abbeyroad.co.uk OF BARROW-IN-FURNESS Above the doorway of this in Ramsden Square on 21st 5 6 baths building there is an May 1872. inscription: “Presented to the town by James The baths building was Ramsden Esq., First Mayor”. used for five years and then became a school of From quality town centre Also in stonework, can be art. Eventually it became a shopping and nightlife, seen the ram’s head from craft training annexe to the to England’s number one his family’s coat of arms. adjoining Technical School place to see nature, Barrow until its closure in 1970. The building was officially has something for every There’s more heritage handed to the town after It is currently used as a visitor. the unveiling of the statue Citizens’ Advice Bureau. than meets the eye! This family friendly town With a rich heritage and a truly offers ‘more than coastal location, Barrow meets the eye.’ offers visitors a wide range of activities and attractions whatever the Find out more at: weather.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information
    Heritage Team 4th Floor 100 Parliament Street London SW1A 2BQ T: 020 7211 2018 [email protected] www.gov.uk/dcms 11 November 2016 Dear Ms Bourdin, Thank you for your letter of 17 October requesting further information regarding the nomination of the English Lake District for World Heritage inscription. You have asked for further details concerning proposals for development in the English Lake District and we feel that it would be helpful to preface our response with some explanation of the planning functions and powers of the Lake District National Park Authority, which is the planning authority for the whole of the candidate English Lake District World Heritage site. The English Lake District is an outstanding cultural landscape that has evolved over a long period of time and needs to continue evolving to sustain its future. We have a vibrant community of some 42,000 residents and an economy that is sustained by the key activities of upland hill farming and tourism. These activities inevitably need to develop in order to sustain the local economy and along with other requirements of the Lake District community, they generate planning applications which are determined by the Lake District National Park Authority. UK National Parks have the highest level of planning protection in the UK and the framework for our decision-making is outlined below. BACKGROUND TO THE PLANNING FUNCTION OF UK NATIONAL PARKS UK National Parks were established under the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949, and amended by the Environment Act 1995, to: conserve and enhance the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage (of the National Parks); and promote opportunities for the understanding and enjoyment of the special qualities (of the National Parks) by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • Trades. [ Westmorland
    176 FAR TRADES. [ WESTMORLAND. FARMERs-continued. Wilkinson Mrs. Margaret,Henridding, Wilson Thomas, Fell house, Lupton, Watson Wm. John, Duckpool,Brough, Dalton, Carnforth Kirkby Lonsdale Kirkby Stephen Wilkinson R. Goose Howe,Hugill,Kndl Wilson Thomas, Fern cottage, Cas- Watters T. & J. Raisbeck, Tebay 8.0 Wilkinson Thos.Askew green, Wither- terton, Kirkby Lonsdale Watts Robert, Toddygill hall, Great slack, Grange-over-Sands S.O Wilson Thomas, Hugill, Kendal Musgrave, Penrith Wilkinson T. Gt. Strickland, Penrith Wilson Thomas Silk, Underfell, Bar- Waugh John, Water nook & Doe grn. Wilkinson W. Frost hall, Warcop 8.0 bon, KilOkby Lonsdale iMartindale, Penrith Wilkinson William, Howe lodge, Lyth, Wilson William,Durham bridge,Lyth, Waugh J. Winton hall,Kirkby Stephn Milnihorpe S.O Milnthorpe S.O Wear Benjamin, Tarn foot, Lough­ Wilkinson Wm. Oxenthwaite, Stain- Wil90nW.Ulpha,Grange-over-Snds.S.O rigg, Arn:bleside more South, Kirkby 8tephen Wilson William, Beech hill &; Kiln- Wear Fisher Mason, Greenbank,Deep­ Willan Bowness, 1Yhitestones, Asby, stone, Long Sleddale, Kenda! dale, Patterdale, Penrith Winderwath, Appleby Wilson William, jun. Bonfire haU. We'iT George, Elea Tarn house, Little Willan George, Drybeck, Killington, Underbarrow, Kendal Lngdale, Ambleside Kirkby Lonsdale Wilson William, Helsington, Kendal Wearmouth William,Eller hilI,Raven­ Willan J. Bow brow,Orton, Tebay S.O Wilson William, sen. Lower Gregg stonedale, Newbiggin S.O Willan J.Church ho.Bramptn..Appleby hall, Underbarrow, Kenda! Webster John Crayston, The Hall, Willan John, Beckfoot, Barbon, Kirk- Winder James, Greenside, Raven- Beetham, Milnthorpe S.O by Lonsdale stonedale, Ne"biggin S.O Weedall H. Low. Plumgarths, Kendal Willan John, Oddendale, Crosby, Winn Mrs. Ann, Beckfoot,' Barbon, Weightman J.
    [Show full text]