The Case Study of Calabar, Nigeria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Case Study of Calabar, Nigeria DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/gjer.v14i1.5 GLOBAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH VOL 14, 2015: 33-45 COPYRIGHT© BACHUDO SCIENCE CO. LTD PRINTED IN NIGERIA. ISSN 1596-292x 33 www.globaljournalseries.com ; [email protected] URBAN DEVELOPMENT IN THE THIRD WORLD AND THREAT TO WETLANDS: THE CASE STUDY OF CALABAR, NIGERIA AJAH E. OBIA, EKPEYONG B. ITAM AND ANIEDI E. ARCHIBONG (Received 26 March 2015; Revision Accepted 23 June 2015) ABSTRACT Wetlands constitute only two percent of the world’s land mass. Yet, a total of 10% of the world population live in wetlands. Also, about 13% of global urban settlements are found in wetlands. Coastal ecosystems are among the most productive in the world and are among the most threatened. A significant global response to this threat was the 1971 Convention held in Ramsar, Iran, to save the world’s wetlands. Unfortunately, most developing countries are not signatories to the convention, and those that are have paid passive attention to its articles; leading to massive loss of wetlands in these countries. Cities along water ways and basins (such as Calabar) are known for their rapid growth. Calabar has witnessed a rapid urban growth of recent. This growth has led to severe encroachment into the city’s wetlands formed by the Great Kwa and Calabar Rivers with the attendant degradation of the ecosystems. This paper examines the danger posed by the spread of the city to these wetlands and proffers solutions that would check the incursion into these pristine natural habitats. The paper also recommends the development of eco-tourism resort as part of the larger Calabar urban landscape architecture. This will add to the tourism potentials of the city as envisaged by Cross River State. KEYWORDS : Calabar, Coastal ecosystem, Kwa River, Ramsar Convention, wetlands INTRODUCTION the world and among the most threatened (MEA, 2005). It is the realization of this threat of recent Human habitations and civilizations have that the world responded by holding a conference been known to flourish in the depressions in 1971 in the Iranian city of Ramsar to chart a between highlands and along the course ways of way forward to save the world’s wetlands water. The valleys provide fertile plains for (Matthews, 1993 and MEA, 2005). agriculture while the waterways provide the This paper first examines existing routes for communication and transportation. literature on wetlands, including the These plains and water margins, having more contemporary world views on such lands as well than their fair share of hydrologic constitution, as their multiple ecologically relevant functions. form the world’s wetlands, with peculiar The paper also specifically examines the threat vegetations and habitats. Wetlands, with their posed by population growth and the attendant unique ecosystems, constitute only two percent urban development on the existing Calabar city of the world’s land, contain 10% of its population, wetlands, against the backdrop of the potential of and 13% of its urban settlements (McGranahan the architectural development of these wetlands et al, 2007). According to Millennium Ecosystem for ecotourism resorts. At the end, the paper Assessment, coastal ecosystems, both onshore recommends a policy change towards the and offshore, are among the most productive in conservation of wetlands amongst others. Ajah E. Obia, Department of Architecture, Cross River University of Technology, Calabar, Nigeria. Ekpeyong B. Itam, Department of Architecture, Cross River University of Technology, Calabar, Nigeria. Aniedi E. Archibong, Department of Architecture, Cross River University of Technology, Calabar, Nigeria. 34 AJAH E. OBIA, EKPEYONG B. ITAM AND ANIEDI E. ARCHIBONG 1.1. The Contemporary Worldview on fen, peat land or water, whether natural or Wetlands artificial, permanent or temporary, with water that The relationship between man and wetlands is static or flowing, fresh, brackish or salt, began at the point of conflict. From prehistoric including areas of marine water, the depth of times man has viewed wetlands as wastelands, which at low tide does not exceed six meters” disastrous realms, custodians of diseases and (Barbier et al, 1997 and MEA, 2005). Article 2.1 obstacles to meaningful development (Matthews, of Ramsar Convention further provides that 1993; Barbier et al, 1997 and EPA, 2006). wetlands “may incorporate riparian and coastal Consistent with this perception, it was presumed zones adjacent to wetlands, and islands or that the most appropriate action for wetlands was bodies of marine water deeper than six metres at reclamation, which actually resulted in the low tide lying within the wetlands” (Barbier et al, destruction and loss of several hectares of 1997 and MEA, 2005). The ecological character wetlands. In the course of the 20 th century alone, of a wetland is “the combination of the ecosystem wetlands were exposed to massive degradation components, processes and services that and destruction, as a consequence of which characterize the wetland at a given point in time” about 50 % of the wetlands were lost. On the (MEA 2005). The wise use of wetlands involves whole, wetlands have been threatened with “the maintenance of their ecological character degradation and destruction more than any other within the context of sustainable development ecosystem of the world (MEA, 2005 and UN- and achieved through the implementation of HABITAT, 2009). ecosystem approaches” (MEA, 2005). Notwithstanding the persistent negative Wetlands are simply described as the and hostile attitudes to wetlands, man has interfacial ecosystem located between terrestrial consistently enjoyed the immense benefits that ecosystems and aquatic ecosystems. They are wetlands offer, since the establishment of the also described as ecotones, being that they earliest urban conurbations in Mesopotamia manifest as transitional elements between nearly five millennia ago (UN-HABITAT, 2009). terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems (Greb et al The realization of this truth has led to changes in 2006). The wetland ecosystems cover 6 percent man’s attitudes to wetlands in the present day. of the land area of the world (Bullock and The worldview about wetlands has changed very Acreman , 2003 Schuyt and Brander 2004) - put dramatically since the second half of the 20 th together this amounts to as much as 1,280 century; they are now regarded among the most million hectares; a territorial mass that is biologically productive ecosystems, being equivalent to 50 % the land area of Brazil or 33 % comparable only to tropical rainforests and coral the land area of USA (MEA 2005). Within the reefs in the diversity of biological species that context of the contemporary worldview on they contain (EPA, 2006). Much of the present wetlands, they make very significant contributions change in attitude towards wetlands of the world to the human environment, namely: food, water is attributable to the work of the Ramsar supply, water purification, flood control, climate Convention of 1971 (full title: Ramsar Convention regulation, coastline protection, recreation and on Wetlands of International Importance). The tourism (EPA 2001 and MEA 2005). In addition, Convention came into being following the they perform a wide range of beneficial functions international treaty that was signed on 2 February in the human environment and also make very 1971 by the representatives of 18 nations at the significant contributions to human well-being little Iranian town of Ramsar (Matthews, 1993 (Horwitz et al 2012). They have also become and MEA, 2005). The extent of the change of important elements in freshwater management at attitude to wetlands is demonstrated by the fact international as well as local levels. that, in many countries of the world, there is The economic contributions of wetlands outright prohibition of degradation of wetlands in constitute another significant consideration the present day (Barbier et al 1997). pertaining to wetlands; these contributions can be The definitions and terminologies of the better understood through the application of Ramsar Convention offer useful guidance some environmental resource valuation towards the sustainable and beneficial use of frameworks. In the determination of the economic wetlands. According to the Millennium Ecosystem uses of wetlands distinction is usually made Assessment of 2005 (MEA, 2005), wetlands have between two sets of values, namely: use values been defined in Article 1.1 of the Convention text and non-use values. Use values include the of the Ramsar Convention as “areas of marsh, direct use of wetland goods (such as food, fuel URBAN DEVELOPMENT IN T HE THIRD WORLD AND THREAT TO WETLANDS 35 wood et cetera) and also indirect uses (such as: from agricultural sites and municipal wastes are water retention, flood control, mitigation of picked up by the roots of wetland plants, thus climate-change impacts etc). Non-use values eliminating the risks of eutrophication in the include aesthetics, cultural interpretations, adjacent aquatic ecosystems. Some wetlands amongst others (Schuyt and Brander 2004). In have been known to have reduced the the determination of the economic values of concentrations of nitrogen in water by as much wetlands the framework that has been adopted as 80 percent. In the rhizosphere regions of the as most appropriate is the total economic value wetland plants, other pollutants and harmful (TEV) . This framework distinguishes between microorganisms are filtered out of water. This present use and potential
Recommended publications
  • Edim Otop Gully Erosion Site in Calabar Municipality, Cross River State
    FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA Public Disclosure Authorized THE NIGERIA EROSION AND WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROJECT (NEWMAP) Public Disclosure Authorized FINAL REPORT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) FOR EDIM OTOP GULLY EROSION SITE IN CALABAR Public Disclosure Authorized MUNICIPALITY, CROSS RIVER STATE Public Disclosure Authorized State Project Management Unit (SPMU) Cross River State, Calabar TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Page i Table of Contents ii List of Tables vii List of Figures viii List of Plates ix Executive Summary xi CHAPTER ONE – INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Description of the Proposed Intervention 3 1.3 Rationale for the Study 5 1.4 Scope of Work 5 CHAPTER TWO - INSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK 7 2.1 Background 7 2.2 World Bank Safeguard Policies 8 2.2.1 Environmental Assessment (EA) OP 4.01 9 2.2.2 Natural Habitats (OP 4.04) 9 2.2.3 Pest Management (OP 4.09) 10 2.2.4 Forest (OP 4.36) 10 2.2.5 Physical Cultural Resources (OP 4.11) 11 2.2.6 Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.12) 11 2.2.7 Safety of Dams OP 4.37 12 2.2.8 Projects on International Waterways OP 7.50 12 2.3 National Policy, Legal, Regulatory and Administrative Frameworks 13 2.3.1 The Federal Ministry of Environment (FMENV) 13 2.3.2 The National Policy on the Environment (NPE) of 1989 14 2.3.3 Environmental Impact Assessment Act No. 86, 1992 (FMEnv) 14 2.3.4 The National Guidelines and Standards for Environmental Pollution Control in Nigeria 14 2.3.5 The National Effluents Limitations Regulation 15 ii 2.3.6 The NEP (Pollution Abatement in Industries and Facilities Generating Waste) Regulations 15 2.3.7 The Management of Solid and Hazardous Wastes Regulations 15 2.3.8 National Guidelines on Environmental Management Systems (1999) 15 2.3.9 National Guidelines for Environmental Audit 15 2.3.10 National Policy on Flood and Erosion Control 2006 (FMEnv) 16 2.3.11 National Air Quality Standard Decree No.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Foci of Industries: a Suitability Analysis
    Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International 14(1): 1-14, 2018; Article no.JGEESI.39994 ISSN: 2454-7352 Geographic Foci of Industries: A Suitability Analysis Abia, Moses1, Eja, Iwara1, Njoku, Chukwudi Gbadebo1*, Okeniyi, Oluwafemi Olubukola2 and Itu, Prince-Charles Omin1 1Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria. 2Department of Geography, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/JGEESI/2018/39994 Editor(s): (1) Masum A. Patwary, Geography and Environmental Science, Begum Rokeya University, Bangladesh. Reviewers: (1) Mandadapu.S. V. K. V. Prasad, Swarnandhra College of Engineering &Technology, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India. (2) Kabir Haruna Danja, Kampala International University, Uganda School of Economics and Applied Statistic, Uganda. (3) Yonnana Ezekiel, Adamawa State University, Nigeria. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history/23672 Received 4th January 2017 th Original Research Article Accepted 13 March 2018 Published 16th March 2018 ABSTRACT Industrial development in the world, especially in developing countries is a prevailing issue with serious emphases on the location of these industries. Finding suitable geographic foci for industries is very important for administrators of firms, investors as well as the government. This geared this study which proffered the most suitable foci for industrial location in Calabar metropolis of Cross River State, Nigeria. In all, data obtained include locations of existing tertiary industries, airport and dumpsite. Also were population figures, pipe-borne water network, topographic, land use and cadastral data (boundaries, roads and rivers).
    [Show full text]
  • Human Migratory Pattern: an Appraisal of Akpabuyo, Cross River State, Nigeria
    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 22, Issue 7, Ver. 16 (July. 2017) PP 79-91 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org Human Migratory Pattern: An Appraisal of Akpabuyo, Cross River State, Nigeria. 1Iheoma Iwuanyanwu, 1Joy Atu (Ph.D.), 1Chukwudi Njoku, 1TonyeOjoko (Arc.), 1Prince-Charles Itu, 2Frank Erhabor 1Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Calabar, Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria 2Department of Geography and Environmental Management, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria Corresponding Author: IheomaIwuanyanwu ABSTRACT: This study assessed migration in Akpabuyo Local Government Area (LGA) of Cross River State, Nigeria. The source regions of migrants in the area were identified; the factors that influence their movements, as well as the remittances of migrants to their source regions were ascertained. A total of 384 copies of questionnaires were systematically administered with a frequency of 230 and 153 samples for migrants and non-migrants respectively. Amongst other findings from the analyses, it was established that Akpabuyo is home to migrants from other LGAs and States, especially BakassiLGA and EbonyiState. There were also migrants from other countries such as Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea. The Pearson‟s correlation analysis depicted significant relationship (P = 0.012) between distance to Akpabuyo and the number of migrants that come into the area, implying that distance significantly influences migration to Akpabuyo. Furthermore, the Correspondence Analysis (CA) showed a weak association between the pull and push factors in the area, buttressed by the chi-square testwhich showed insignificant statistical similarity (p = 0.118). It was also established that migrants remitted 74% of their income to their source regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Heavy Metal Profiles in Various Matrices of the Bonny/New Calabar River Estuary, Niger Delta, Nigeria
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/gjes.v12i1.1 GLOBAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES VOL. 12, 2013: 1-11 1 COPYRIGHT© BACHUDO SCIENCE CO. LTD PRINTED IN NIGERIA ISSN 1596-6194 www.globaljournalseries.com , Email: [email protected] HEAVY METAL PROFILES IN VARIOUS MATRICES OF THE BONNY/NEW CALABAR RIVER ESTUARY, NIGER DELTA, NIGERIA B. B. BABATUNDE, F. D. SIKOKI, M. C. ONOJAKE, R. U. AKPIRI AND D. AKPULOMA ABSTRACT A study of the concentrations of Ca, Mg, K, Zn, Pb, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ni and Na in the sediment, sea water, fish and crab of the Bonny/New Calabar River Estuary in Niger Delta, Nigeria was carried out using atomic absorption spectrophotometer A-100 for two consecutive years. The contamination levels of the respective metals varied between 2011 and 2012and the range of mean values for all metals in mg/kg were presented along with variations at statistically significant level (P <0.05) between the two years studied. Only K, Zn and Co exhibited variation in their concentrations in water samples between the two years at a statistical significant level (P <0.05) probability. In sediment, only Cr varied between the two years at a statistically significant level (P = 0.05). All metals concentrations were higher in sediment than in water samples.Bioaccumulation factor (BF) indicated a more potent source of metals from sediment than water with organisms accumulating Zn, Fe and Ni in the magnitude of 10, 6 and 5 times more from sediment than from water. Some metals were more accumulated in fish than crab and vice versa.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Genetic Differentiation As Assessed by Uniparental Markers in the Presence of Substantial Language Variation in Peoples O
    Veeramah et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:92 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/92 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Little genetic differentiation as assessed by uniparental markers in the presence of substantial language variation in peoples of the Cross River region of Nigeria Krishna R Veeramah1,2*, Bruce A Connell3, Naser Ansari Pour4, Adam Powell5, Christopher A Plaster4, David Zeitlyn6, Nancy R Mendell7, Michael E Weale8, Neil Bradman4, Mark G Thomas5,9,10 Abstract Background: The Cross River region in Nigeria is an extremely diverse area linguistically with over 60 distinct languages still spoken today. It is also a region of great historical importance, being a) adjacent to the likely homeland from which Bantu-speaking people migrated across most of sub-Saharan Africa 3000-5000 years ago and b) the location of Calabar, one of the largest centres during the Atlantic slave trade. Over 1000 DNA samples from 24 clans representing speakers of the six most prominent languages in the region were collected and typed for Y-chromosome (SNPs and microsatellites) and mtDNA markers (Hypervariable Segment 1) in order to examine whether there has been substantial gene flow between groups speaking different languages in the region. In addition the Cross River region was analysed in the context of a larger geographical scale by comparison to bordering Igbo speaking groups as well as neighbouring Cameroon populations and more distant Ghanaian communities. Results: The Cross River region was shown to be extremely homogenous for both Y-chromosome and mtDNA markers with language spoken having no noticeable effect on the genetic structure of the region, consistent with estimates of inter-language gene flow of 10% per generation based on sociological data.
    [Show full text]
  • Rspo Notification of Proposed New Planting
    RSPO NOTIFICATION OF PROPOSED NEW PLANTING This notification shall be on RSPO website for 30 days as required by the RSPO procedures for new plantings (http://www.rspo.otg/?q=page/535). It has also been posted on local on-site notice boards. Tick whichever is appropriate √ This is a completely new development and stakeholders may submit comments This is part of an ongoing planting and is meant for notifications only Company : Biase Plantation Limited (Calaro Extension) Subsidiary : Wilmar International Limited RSPO Membership No: 2-0017-05-000-00 on behalf Wilmar International Limited since on 15 August 2005 Location of Proposed New Planting: Atan Odot village and Uwet village, Odukpani and Akamkpa Local Government Area, Cross River State, Nigeria. GPS Reference: Calaro Extension Area of Biase Plantation Limited is geographically located on Latitude: 80 16‘51“to 80 21‘26“North and Longitude: 50 15‘ 30“ to 50 17‘ 47“ East. 1 RSPO New Planting Procedure Assessment Report CALARO Extension Estate of Biase Plantation Ltd – Cross River State, Nigeria Location of the Proposed New Planting Total area acquired by Biase Plantation Limited (BPL) according to the MoU between the government of Cross River State of Nigeria and Uwet & Atan Odot Communities / Ikot Eyidok dated on 10 January 2013 and MoU between the landlord communities and Biase Plantation Ltd dated on 10th December 2015 is 3,066.214ha (shown on survey plan no. RIU/CR/191/12). This included potential overlaps with the Uwet-Odot Forest Reserve and the Oban Forest Reserve. Subsequent re-demarcation has excluded the areas of overlap and reduced the total concession area to 2,368.94 Ha (Deed of grant between the government of Cross River State of Nigeria and Biase Plantations Ltd).
    [Show full text]
  • Cross River STATE-WIDE RAPID HEALTH FACILITY ASSESSMENT
    Report of the Cross River STATE-WIDE RAPID HEALTH FACILITY ASSESSMENT In Preparation for Elimination of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV March 2013 Report of the Cross River STATE-WIDE RAPID HEALTH FACILITY ASSESSMENT In Preparation for Elimination of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV May 2013 This publication may be freely reviewed, quoted, reproduced, or translated, in full or in part, provided the source is acknowledged. The mention of specific organizations does not imply endorsement and does not suggest that they are recommended by the Cross River State Ministry of Health over others of a similar nature not mentioned. Copyright © 2013 Cross River State Ministry of Health, Nigeria Citation: Cross River State Ministry of Health and FHI 360. 2013. Cross River State-wide Rapid Health Facility Assessment, Nigeria: Cross River State Ministry of Health and FHI 360. The Cross River State-wide Rapid Health Facility Assessment was supported in part by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). FHI 360 provided assistance to the Cross River State Government to conduct this assessment. Financial assistance was provided by USAID under the terms of the Cooperative Agreement AID-620-A-00002, of the Strengthening Integrated Delivery of HIV/ AIDS Services Project. This report does not necessarily reflect the views of FHI 360, USAID or the United States Government. Table of Contents Foreword ......................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria - Accessibility to Emonc Facilities in the State of Cross River
    Nigeria - Accessibility to EmONC facilities in the State of Cross River Last Update: March 2016 Nigeria - Accessibility to EmONC facilities for the Cross River State Table of Contents Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 5 2. Measured indicators and assumptions .................................................................................... 5 3. Tool used for the different analyses: AccessMod 5.0 ............................................................. 7 4. Data and national norms used in the different analyses .......................................................... 8 4.1 Statistical Data ............................................................................................................... 9 4.1.1 LGA Number of pregnant women for 2010 and 2015 ........................................... 9 4.2 Geospatial Data ........................................................................................................... 12 4.2.1 Administrative boundaries and extent of the study area ...................................... 13 4.2.2 Geographic location of the EmONC facilities and associated information ......... 17 4.2.4 Transportation network ........................................................................................ 26 4.2.5 Hydrographic network ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 7.14 Nigeria Capital City Abuja Population (2005 Est.) 141,400,000 (2.2% Growth)
    The Ocean Data and Information Network of Africa 7.14 Nigeria Capital city Abuja Population (2005 est.) 141,400,000 (2.2% growth) GDP per capita (USD 2005 est.) $1 128 Life expectancy at birth (2005 est.) 46.5 years (male - 46.0, female - 47.1) Land and water area 923,768 km2 (land - 910 768, water - 13 000) Length of coastline 853 km Dr. Larry Awosika, Dr. Regina Folorunsho* ---------------------------------- Highest point of elevation Mount Chappei Waddi 2 419 m Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research P.M.B. 12729 Victoria Island Coral reef area (2001 est.) 0 km Lagos *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Mangrove area (2005 est.) 997,000 ha Marine protected areas (2007 est.) 0 km2 (0% of total territorial waters) Capture fisheries prod. (2006 est.) 552,323 metric tones N Aquaculture fisheries prod. (2006 est.) 84,578 metric tones NIGER CHAD Sokoto Chad Katsina Yobe Sokoto Jigawa Rivers to the Country’s Coast: The river catchment basins in the Katagum Kano Borno coastal zone consist of the western Nigeria catchment basin, the Niger Kebbi Benue catchment basin, and the south-eastern catchment basin. The major rivers in the western Nigerian catchment basin consist of Kaduna Ogun, Owena, Osun and Shasha which are sourced from the Yoruba Bauchi BENIN Niger highlands and drain the landmass in the south western part of Nigeria. Kaduna These rivers empty into the Lagos lagoon. Kwara Niger Adamwa Plateau Ogun ABUJA The Niger Benue catchment basin is dominated by the Niger and Benue Banua Oyo rivers. The Niger River flowing over coarse, crystalline, Cretaceous Kogi Taraba CAMEROON and Cenozoic base complex enter the country in the west, and has Osun Niger Benus Chappai Waddi a total length of 4 123 km - making it the eleventh longest river in Endo Ogun 2419m the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Impacts of Wastewater Discharge from the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital on the Biota of Great Kwa River, Nigeria
    Research Article Fish & Ocean Opj Volume 1 Issue 5 - March 2017 DOI: 10.19080/OFOAJ.2017.01.555571 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Ama-Abasi DE Possible Impacts of Wastewater Discharge from the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital on the Biota of Great Kwa River, Nigeria Ama-Abasi DE*, William G and Akpan ER Institute of Oceanography, University of Calabar, Nigeria Submission: February 19, 2017; Published: March 24, 2017 *Corresponding author: Ama-Abasi DE, Institute of Oceanography, University of Calabar, Nigeria, Email: Introduction and radiography laboratories. Being a tertiary health institution, Waste water generated from hospitals usually contain for tertiary health care delivery, the Hospital is endowed with state of the art research laboratories. Waste water from the pharmaceutical substances with genotoxic properties, chemical pathogens human tissues and fluids partially metabolized Teaching Hospital drains via a reservoir directly into the Great substances, heavy metals, and radioactive waste, which may Kwa River. The Great Kwa River is a tributary of the Cross endanger public health and welfare. According to Emmanuel et River Estuary, located between latitudes 4° 45’N and 5° 15’N al. [1], hospitals generate an average of 750 litres of waste water and longitudes 8° 15’E and 8° 30’E. The Great Kwa River takes its rise from the Oban Hills in Northern Cross River State, and microorganisms and other toxic chemical substances Hospital by bed per day. These effluents are loaded with pathogenic meanders southwards through mainly the rain forest belt before discharging into the Cross River Estuary covering a distance in streams, lakes, rivers, sea, ocean where they often have effluent and most public waste water eventually end up of approximately 56km with an average width of 2.8km at deleterious effects on the receiving environment and interfere the mouth where it empties into the Cross River Estuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross River State
    CROSS RIVER STATE Geopolitical Profile: The name Cross River State was given in 1976 to the former South Eastern State which was created on May 27, 1967 from the former Eastern Region of Nigeria. The current Cross River State is what remains of it when Akwa Ibom State was carved out on 23rd of September, 1987. As presently constituted, Cross River State has 18 Local Government Areas namely; Abi, Akamkpa, Akpabuyo, Bakassi, Bekwarra, Biase, Boki, Calabar Municipality, Calabar South, Etung, Ikom, Obanliku, Obubra, Obudu, Odukpani, Ogoja, Yakurr, and Yala; with the city of Calabar as the State capital. The State has land area of 23,000 square kilometres and a population of 2,888,966 in 2006. With a growth rate of 2.9 per cent per annum, the estimated population for 2014 stands at 3,631,328, and a population density of 1,579 persons per square kilometre. Located within the tropical rainforest belt of Nigeria, Cross River State lies between longitudes 7⁰ 50’ and 9⁰ 28’ East and latitudes 4⁰ 28’and 6⁰ 55’ North. It shares a common boundary with The Republic of Cameroun in the East, Benue State in the North, Ebonyi and Abia States in the West, Akwa Ibom State in the South West and The Atlantic Ocean in the South. Its international boundaries make it a security hotspot and an axis of international trade. Cross River State, like other States in the country, returned to democratic governance in 1999 after the interventions of the military. It has since been governed by the People’s Democratic Party (PDP).
    [Show full text]
  • NIGERIA: Registration of Cameroonian Refugees September 2019
    NIGERIA: Registration of Cameroonian Refugees September 2019 TARABA KOGI BENUE TAKUM 1,626 KURMI NIGERIA 570 USSA 201 3,180 6,598 SARDAUNA KWANDE BEKWARA YALA DONGA-MANTUNG MENCHUM OBUDU OBANLIKU ENUGU 2,867 OGOJA AKWAYA 17,301 EBONYI BOKI IKOM 1,178 MAJORITY OF THE ANAMBRA REFUGEES ORIGINATED OBUBRA FROM AKWAYA 44,247 ABI Refugee Settlements TOTAL REGISTERED YAKURR 1,295ETUNG MANYU REFUGEES FROM IMO CAMEROON CROSS RIVER ABIA BIOMETRICALLY BIASE VERIFIED 35,636 3,533 AKAMKPA CAMEROON Refugee Settlements ODUKPANI 48 Registration Site CALABAR 1,058MUNICIPAL UNHCR Field Office AKWA IBOM CALABAR NDIAN SOUTH BAKASSI667 UNHCR Sub Office 131 58 AKPABUYO RIVERS Affected Locations 230 Scale 1:2,500,000 010 20 40 60 80 The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official Kilometers endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Data Source: UNHCR Creation Date: 2nd October 2019 DISCLAIMER: The boundaries and names shown, and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. A technical team has been conducting a thorough review of the information gathered so as to filter out any data discrepancies. BIOMETRICALLY VERIFIED REFUGEES REGISTRATION TREND PER MONTH 80.5% (35,636 individuals) of the total refugees 6272 counteded at household level has been 5023 registered/verified through biometric capture of iris, 4025 3397 fingerprints and photo. Refugee information were 2909 2683 2371 also validated through amendment of their existing 80.5% information, litigation and support of national 1627 1420 1513 1583 586 VERIFIED documentations. Provision of Refugee ID cards will 107 ensure that credible information will effectively and efficiently provide protection to refugees.
    [Show full text]