PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION (2021) 58(5), ISSN 1553 - 6939 Article Received: 22th November, 2020; Article Revised: 26th March, 2021; Article Accepted: 26th April, 2021 The narrators who were weakened by Yaqoub Bin Shaiba and other scholars disagreed with him (Critical study) Jasim Mohammed Rashid University of Fallujah , Iraq
[email protected] ABSTRACT The research aims to highlight the efforts of the critics among the scholars of hadith in preserving the Sunnah of the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, from increase, decrease, loss, forgetfulness, interpretation of the ignorant, and the increase of the righteous, without taking them in God as a blame for the blame. From every successor his impurity is denied from him the distortion of the gallant and the impersonation of the false and the interpretation of the ignorant), and among these scholars Yaqoub bin Shaiba, who has a long tradition in the science of men. They mentioned the narrators with whom other scholars disagreed, briefing the one who had a narration in the two Sahihs or one of them, indicating his evidence in that speech and comparing it to other critical scholars’s words, then weighing what I think is most likely to be obtained from the evidence and sayings given to us by the two Sahihs of the status of the Islamic ummah. Keywords narrators , Yaqoub Bin Shaiba , Critical study Introduction and before delving into them, I say Jacob must have a brief translation of Punishment and the Praise be to God, Lord of the Worlds, and may most prominent of his students and elders, and I peace and blessings be upon our Master say the scholars about it, and this research was in Muhammad and upon his family and companions two requirements: Either after The first requirement: his name, nickname and For what distinguished the Islamic nation over surname.