DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 34/Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 34/Tuesday, February 21, 2012 9960 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Notices condition of the lease and the increased dependent residents with high-quality collected oral and written comments. In rental and royalty rates cited above. rail transit that improves transportation addition, throughout the review period, access and mobility between existing NPS received a total of 98 comment Debra Marsh, streetcar service at Fisherman’s Wharf letters on the proposed action. The Supervisor, Branch of Adjudication, Division and SF Maritime NHP and the Fort majority of those that commented on the of Energy & Minerals. Mason Center in GGNRA, with Draft EIS supported the proposed [FR Doc. 2012–3897 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am] connection to the regional transit rail action. The public’s primary concerns BILLING CODE 4310–40–P services. The Final EIS evaluates about the preferred alternative included potential environmental consequences mitigating the loss of parking, of implementing the alternatives. Impact displacement of street artist sales DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR topics include the cultural, natural, and spaces, increased traffic congestion, National Park Service socioeconomic environments. noise and congestion near the Marina The proposed action is the neighborhood, conflicts with other [NPS–PWR–PWRO–1103–8840; 2051–P580– culmination of a cooperative effort by planned projects, and mitigating 579] the National Park Service, the San impacts to National Historic Landmark Francisco Municipal Transportation resources. Many also suggested various Final Environmental Impact Statement Agency (SFMTA), and the Federal for Extension of F–Line Streetcar design ideas and other measures to help Transit Administration. Studies from reduce these impacts. Service to Fort Mason Center, San these agencies identified a need for Francisco, CA In coordination with other affected improved regional and local transit agencies, and after considering all oral AGENCY: National Park Service, connectivity between the identified and written comments, the NPS Department of the Interior. urban national parks and existing transit prepared the Final EIS. The analysis infrastructure. Transit improvements ACTION: Notice of Availability of the revealed Alternative 1 (No Action) to be Final Environmental Impact Statement between these parks would help the Environmentally Preferred for the Extension of F–Line Streetcar accommodate existing and future visitor Alternative. Alternative 2 was found to demand and enhance operational Service to Fort Mason Center, San be the superior alternative with effectiveness. Based on the agency Francisco, California. Alternative 2A (North Loop) the studies, conceptual approaches to preferred option for the Turnaround, SUMMARY: Pursuant to National address alternative transportation needs and thus NPS’s Final Preferred Action Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 were identified and evaluated against Alternative. U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park the purpose and need of the project, Decision Process: The NPS will Service announces availability of the park management objectives, and prepare a Record of Decision no sooner Final Environmental Impact Statement operability constraints. than 30 days following EPA’s notice in Through an intensive public review (Final EIS) for the extension of the the Federal Register of filing of the process, two action alternatives were historic streetcar F-line from Final EIS. As a delegated EIS, the identified in addition to the No Action Fisherman’s Wharf to the Fort Mason official responsible for approval of the Alternative (Alternative 1)—the Center, in San Francisco, California. extension of F–Line streetcar service Preferred Action Alternative has two DATES: The National Park Service (NPS) from Fisherman’s Wharf to the Fort options for the track turnaround will execute a Record of Decision (ROD) Mason Center is the Regional Director; configuration (Alternatives 2A and 2B). not sooner than 30 days after subsequently the officials responsible Common elements of the Preferred publication in the Federal Register by for implementation will the Action Alternatives include the the Environmental Protection Agency extension of approximately 0.85 mile of Superintendents of San Francisco (EPA) of its notice of filing of the Final new rail track; associated features such Maritime National Historical Park and EIS. as signals, crossings, wires and poles; Golden Gate National Recreation Area. ADDRESSES: The Final EIS is available approximately 8–9 new platforms; new Dated: December 6, 2012. for public inspection as follows: at the designated stops; retrofitting of the Martha J. Lee, Office of the Superintendent, Golden historic State Belt Railroad tunnelFort Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region. Gate National Recreation Area (Bldg. Mason Tunnel: tunnel (Fort Mason 201 Fort Mason, San Francisco, [FR Doc. 2012–3959 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am] Tunnel). The primary difference BILLING CODE 4312–FN–P California), and at local public libraries between Alternatives 2A and 2B as noted on the Project Web site http:// involves the location in which the parkplanning.np.gov/goga. An streetcar would turn around at the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR electronic version may also be accessed terminus of the proposed track at the Project Web site. For further extension. Under Alternative 2A, the National Park Service information, please contact Mr. Steve streetcar would turn around via a loop Ortega, Bldg. 201 Fort Mason, San in the Fort Mason Center parking lot [NPS–WASO–NRNHL–0112–9383; 2200– 3200–665] Francisco, CA 94123–0022 (415) 561– (North Loop). Under Alternative 2B, the 2841 or [email protected]. streetcar would turn around via a loop National Register of Historic Places; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The in the Great Meadow (South Loop). Notification of Pending Nominations proposed action would extend the The Draft EIS was made available for and Related Actions historic streetcar F-line from public review for 60 days (March 18– Fisherman’s Wharf to the San Francisco May 23, 2011); the full text and graphics Nominations for the following Maritime National Historical Park (SF were also posted on the NPS Planning, properties being considered for listing Maritime NHP) and to the Fort Mason Environment and Public Comment Web or related actions in the National Center in the Golden Gate National site. A public open house on the Register were received by the National Recreation Area (GGNRA). The intended proposed action was held on April 20, Park Service before January 21, 2012. effect of the proposed action is to 2011, and attended by a total of 81 Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR part provide park visitors and transit- people, during which the Project team 60, written comments are being VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:29 Feb 17, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM 21FEN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Notices 9961 accepted concerning the significance of KANSAS Lincoln County the nominated properties under the Sedgwick County Depoe Bay Ocean Wayside, 119 SW US 101, National Register criteria for evaluation. Depoe Bay, 12000082 Comments may be forwarded by United Kansas Gas & Electric Company Building, 120 E. 1st St., Wichita, 12000064 Wallowa County States Postal Service, to the National MAINE Enterprise IOOF Hall, (Downtown Enterprise Register of Historic Places, National MPS) 105 NE 1st St., Enterprise, 12000083 Park Service, 1849 C St. NW., MS 2280, Cumberland County Enterprise Mercantile and Milling Company Washington, DC 20240; by all other Children’s Hospital, 68 High St., Portland, Building, Downtown Enterprise MPS) 115 carriers, National Register of Historic E. Main St., Enterprise, 12000084 12000065 O.K. Theatre, (Downtown Enterprise MPS) Places, National Park Service,1201 Eye Portland Waterfront (Boundary Increase), 208 W. Main St., Enterprise, 12000085 St. NW., 8th floor, Washington DC Merrill’s Wharf, 252–260 Commercial St., 20005; or by fax, 202–371–6447. Written Portland, 12000066 SOUTH DAKOTA or faxed comments should be submitted by March 7, 2012. Before including your MASSACHUSETTS Clay County address, phone number, email address, Essex County Forest Avenue Historic District (Boundary or other personal identifying Increase), 15–322 Forest Ave., 205–221 LAMARTINE (shipwreck), (Granite Vessel Lewis St., Vermillion, 12000086 information in your comment, you Shipwrecks in the Stellwagen Bank NMS should be aware that your entire MPS) Address Restricted, Gloucester, WASHINGTON comment—including your personal 12000067 Pierce County identifying information—may be made Hampden County Curran, Charles and Mary Louise, House, publicly available at any time. While 4009 Curran Ln., University Place, you can ask us in your comment to Outing Park Historic District, Roughly bounded by Saratoga, Niagara, Oswego, & 12000088 withhold your personal identifying Bayoone Sts., Springfield, 12000068 information from public review, we Whatcom County cannot guarantee that we will be able to Suffolk County Axtell, Dr. William H. and Frances C., House, do so. Revere City Hall and Police Station, 281 413 E. Maple St., Bellingham, 12000087 Broadway & 23 Pleasant St., Revere, In the interest of preservation a three day J. Paul Loether, 12000070 comment period is requested for the Chief, National Register of Historic Places/ following resource: MINNESOTA National Historic Landmarks Program. MASSACHUSETTS Winona County ALASKA Suffolk
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Administrative History of Sitka National Historic Park
    S/TK SITKA NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK An Administrative History — --Cover Sgt. John J. McLean, U.S. Signal Service (right) Assistant Paymaster Edwin B. Webb, U.S. Navy, ca_ 1885, on Indian River bridge. (Fickett Collec- tion, University of Alaska Anchorage Archives) ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY OF SITKA NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK by Joan M. Antonson and William S. Hanable Prepared under contract by: PO Box 200608 IPH/JMA-Alaska Anchorage William S. Hanable/Joan M. Antonson, Alaska 99520 Principal Investigators 907-345-6734/276-1946 April 1987 Published by: Alaska Region National Park Service 2525 Gambell Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 December 1987 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://archive.org/details/administrativehiOOanto Preface In 1985 Sitka National Historical Park celebrated 75 years as a national monument and national park, an anniversary predating that of the National Park Service itself. Yet its history as a public park goes back even further to its designation by Presi- dent Benjamin Harrison in 1890. The government's foresight in preserving the historic site is manifest to anyone visiting this gem of green at the mouth of Indian River where a battle was fought and a land lost. The Tlingit Indians have always called this land home. In a pitched battle in 1804 they withdrew from the Sitka area, leaving it to the Russian fur-traders, who founded their New Archangel on the nearby point, now downtown Sitka. Later, the Tlingit returned to Sitka after agreements tacit and verbal, living some- what in harmony with the intruders, with occasional outbursts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sitka Historic Preservation Plan
    SITKA HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN Sitka Historic Preservation Commission City and Borough of Sitka Sitka, Alaska Sitka, Alaska February 2017 A Guide for Cultural Resource Preservation, Protection, and Advocacy The Sitka Historic Preservation Plan Prepared for the City and Borough of Sitka Mathew Hunter, Mayor Sitka Historic Preservation Commission Assembly Liaison City and Borough of Sitka Planning and Community Development Department Maegan Bosak, Director Michael Scarcelli J.D., Senior Planner Samantha Pierson, Planner I and City and Borough of Sitka’s Historic Preservation Commission Anne Pollnow, Chair Ana Ditmar, Vice Chair Roby Littlefield, Secretary James Poulson Scot Saline Robert Sam Clara Gray Prepared by Preservation Plan Subcommittee Anne Pollnow Ana Ditmar Roby Littlefield Adopted , 2017 Ordinance No. 17- Cover photo: Sitka from [the] water, ca. 1897. WLR Alaska 1900 Photograph Album Collection. Frank La Roche Photograph No. 1246. Photo # ASL-P95-069 (Alaska State Library - Historical Collections) CITY AND BOROUGH OF SITKA HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This strategic plan provides goals, objectives, recommendations, and proposed actions for a historic preservation program within the City and Borough of Sitka. This plan outlines future directions and undertakings to grow a practical and purposeful preservation program for Sitka’s municipality. Recommended tasks and actions should be considered as projects of their own to be developed with the participation of appropriate stakeholders and professionals in the field of historic preservation. Over the next several years, in addition to survey and inventory work, we will focus on education and outreach, increasing funds for historic preservation, and on assisting the community of Sitka in land use planning and the promotion of sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Visitor Information Center  St
    =Downtown Visitor Information Center St. Peter’s by the Sea Russian Cemetery Shop/Dine Episcopal Church Downtown Baranof Castle Hill Princess Maksoutoff’s Sitka Sound Science Center Grave St. Michael’s Cathedral Sheldon Jackson Museum Russian Blockhouse 2 Alaska Native Sitka Fine Arts Campus Sitka Lutheran Church Brotherhood Hall Sitka National Historical Old Sitka Dock Sitka Cross Harrigan Centennial Hall Park Sheet’ka Kwaán Naa Kahidi Clan House Trail Sitka Historical Museum 6 Miles Lake Alaska Raptor Center Totem Square Baranof Russian Bishop’s House Fortress of the Bear Pioneer Home Swan Sitka National Cemetery Lake Merrill H alibu DeGroff t Poin t R Sitka National Cemetery Hemlock d. Spruce 14 Lake Indian River Rd. Sawmill Creek Rd. Biorka Park Oja Hames Monastery W Erler Police a S Grocery P.E. lk aw Dept. in m 15 Fire Baranof Center g P ill Russian Dept a C t re h e Cemetery Oja Etolin k R O d 12 it b John Brady . K g s Raptor Way a in Marine e Visitor lin a l r to g T Princess v E Finn Alley w 16 a Information Barlow 6 7 Jeff Davis 10 a t o Fortress of a r n y Lincoln St. ta S the Bear a Post ea W n d al 5 Miles 17 Sewa r Office k e K American leg 13 at ol l i B C 9 a n a r 18 r a Cruise 8 c ANB k 2 L Crescent Harbor i Kelly 19 s Dock n Harbor c 21 3 r.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Readjustment, Education, And
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 054 446 AC 010 792. TITLE Hearings before the Subcommittee on Readjustment Education, and Employment of the Committee on Veterans, Affairs: United States Senate, 92nd Congress, First Session (April 28, May 10, 1971) INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S.I Washington, DX. Senate Committee on Veteran's Affairs. PUB DATE 71 NOTE 277p. AVAILABLE FROM Superintendent of Documents, United States Govern ent Printing Office, Washington- D.C. 20402 (no price quoted) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$9.87 DESCRIPTORS Credit (Finance )e *Educational Opportunities; *Employment Opportunities; *Federal Legislation; *Medical Services; Military Service; Organizations (Groups); *Veterans; Vocational Rehabilitation IDENTIFIERS American Legion; Veterans Administration; *Vietnam War ABSTRACT Hearings held before a Congressional Committee on the problems of Readjustment and Job Assistance for Vietnam Veterans include the statements of H. R. Rainwater, Commander in Chief, Veterans of Foreign Wars and Alfred P. Chamie, National Commander, the American Legion. The need for vocational training for veterans is emphasized, this to include on-the-job training and work-study educational programs. Printed materials included are "Reach Out," a 1971 Planning Guide for Service and Membership published by the American Legion; "Our Kind of Guy," a program of Legion Service to recently discharged veterans; the "Post Service Officers Manual" with a special section outlining benefits available to Vietnam veterans; "Mandates to the National Economic Commission" from the 52nd National Convention of the American Legion and meeting of the National Executive Committee; excerpts from issues of the American 'Legion magazine concerning Legion activities related to jobs for veterans program; and "Mandates to the National Veterans Affairs and Rehabilitation Commission" from the 52nd National Convention of the American Legion requesting that the Commission sponsor and support legislative measures to improve the veterans educational assistance program, among other requests.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Legion Magazine Is Published Monthly at 1100 Magazine West Broadway, Louisville, Ky., by the American Legion
    ' AMERICAN 15c • JANUARY 1963 MAGAZINE — ... mmuli hi i in * The American JANUARY 1963 Volume 74, Number 1 POSTMASTER: Send Form 3S79 to P.O. Box 10SS, Indianapolis 6, Ind. LEGION The American Legion Magazine is published monthly at 1100 Magazine West Broadway, Louisville, Ky., by The American Legion. Copy, right 1962 by The American Le- gion. Second-class postage paid Contents for January 1963 at Louisville. Ky. Price: single copy, 15 cents; yearly subscrip- tion, $1.50. Nonmember sub- scriptions should be sent to the THE BIG ISSUE - PRO & CON ARGUMENTS ON THE QUESTION: Circulation Department of The American Legion Magazine. P.O ' Box 1055. Indianapolis 6. Ind. 'SHOULD CONGRESS CURB THE FILIBUSTER?" 4 pro: SEN. PHILIP A. HART (D-Mich.) CHANGE OF ADDRESS: con: SEN. RICHARD B. RUSSELL (D-Ga.) Notify Circulation Dept., P. O. Box 1055, Indianapolis 6, Ind.. using Post Office Form 3578. At- tach old address label and give old and new addresses and cur- A THREAT TO AMERICAN rent membership card number. INDUSTRY 10 Also be sure to notify your Post BY WILLIAM R. KINTNER Adjutant. Some anti-monopoly actions play into the hands of The American Legion the Soviet, anxious to weaken our economic structure. Executive and Administrative Offices Indianapolis 6. Indiana James E. Powers, National Commander, The American Le- WHAT HAPPENED TO THE CYCLOPS? 12 gion, Indianapolis 6, Ind, BY GARDNER SOULE The American Legion Publica- tions Commission: After 45 years there is still no clue as to the huge Edward McSwcency, Armonk, Navy collier that disappeared suddenly, without trace. N.Y. (Chairman); Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Progress Report
    Preserve America, EO 13287 Section 3 Report Department of Veterans Affairs INTRODUCTION – Executive Order 13287, “Preserve America” (2003) directs Federal agencies to include historic preservation in their day-to-day planning and management, and to report periodically on their progress. This report of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Office of Construction and Facilities Management, updates reports initially issued in 2005 and most recently in 2011. VA was created (as the Veterans Administration) in 1930, combining several more specialized pre-existing government programs. It manages 153 medical centers and related facilities, 133 National Cemeteries, and a number of other facilities such as leased community based clinics and substance abuse center; it also provides assistance to states, local governments, and Indian tribes in providing services to veterans and their families. VA is responsible for a broad array of historic places – districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects – as well as other kinds of heritage assets (collections, documents, etc.) – in a range of conditions. Many of these have been identified, documented, and sometimes included in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP); 17 are National Historic Landmarks (NHLs). Many more have not yet been fully evaluated, or even identified; identification, inventory, and documentation work is ongoing. VA has had a historic preservation program since the 1960s, primarily focused on ensuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) in connection with VA construction projects, and on nominating selected properties to the NRHP. In recent years VA’s Federal Preservation Office (fPO) has undertaking a range of systemic program improvements designed both to broaden VA’s consideration of cultural resources and to integrate such consideration more effectively into agency planning and operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving Our Past: Planning for Our Future Alaska’S State Historic Preservation Plan 2018-2023 This Is Your Plan
    Saving Our Past: Planning for Our Future Alaska’s State Historic Preservation Plan 2018-2023 This is your plan. #ThisPlaceMatters McCarty Telegraph Station-Big Delta Chicken Ridge Historic District-Juneau Independence Mine State Historical Park Seldovia Cemetery Dunkle Street Cabin-Fairbanks S A E L C A S R K U A O S D E E R P A L R A T R M E T U N T O F N A Prepared for: Office of History and Archaeology Prepared by: Office of History and Archaeology, Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation, Interpretation and Education Funded by: Alaska Department of Natural Resources Saving Our Past: Planning for Our Future Alaska’s State Historic Preservation Plan 2018-2023 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 Vision For Preservation In Alaska 2 2. Acknowledgments 3 Acknowledgment Of Support 4 3. Why Encourage Historic Preservation? 7 4. The State Historic Preservation Plan 13 Previous Plan-Saving Our Past 13 Current Planning Effort 14 #ThisPlaceMatters Alaska 16 Issues And Goals 16 Revision Of The Plan 17 5. The Office of History and Archaeology and State Historic Preservation Office 23 Alaska Historical Commission 23 Office Of History And Archaeology 24 State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) 25 6. Overview Of Alaska’s Prehistory And History 33 Interior traditions 34 Maritime Traditions-Arctic And Bering Sea 38 Maritime Traditions-Aleutian Islands 40 Maritime Traditions-Gulf Of Alaska 40 Historic Period 43 7. Assessment Of Alaska’s Cultural Resources 53 Alaska Heritage Resources Survey (Ahrs) 53 Overview Of Alaska’s Cultural Resources 56 Page ii Table of Contents 8.
    [Show full text]
  • NCA Welcome Packet
    Welcome Packet Human Capital Management, Policy & Programs May 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Welcome from Randy C. Reeves, Under Secretary for Memorial Affairs Leadership Covenant, Under Secretary for Memorial Affairs Mission/Vision Statement ICARE Core Values and Characteristics Who We Are Facts About the National Cemetery Administration The National Cemetery Administration Department of Veterans Affairs: How We Are Organized VA Organizational Chart Biographical Information for VA Senior Executive Leadership: Secretary of Veterans Affairs Deputy Secretary, Veterans Affairs Chief of Staff, Veterans Affairs National Cemetery Administration: How We Are Organized NCA Organizational Chart Biographical Information for NCA Senior Executive Leadership Under Secretary for Memorial Affairs, NCA Principal Deputy Under Secretary for Memorial Affairs, NCA Chief of Staff, NCA Deputy Under Secretary for Field Programs and Cemetery Operations Deputy Under Secretary for Finance and Planning and Chief Financial Officer Deputy Under Secretary for Management Executive Director for Cemetery Operations Executive Director, Field Programs Executive Director, Human Capital Management Executive Director, Strategy and Analysis Executive Director, Engagement and Memorial Innovations Map of NCA Cemetery Districts North Atlantic District Biographical Information for NCA Senior Executive Leadership Executive Director, North Atlantic District Executive Cemetery Director, Calverton National Cemetery Map of North Atlantic Districts 1 Southeast District Biographical Information
    [Show full text]