English / French
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
World Heritage 38 COM WHC-14/38.COM/INF.8B4.Rev Doha, 16 June 2014 Original: English / French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Thirty-eighth session Doha, Qatar 15 – 25 June 2014 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger INF.8B4: Factual error letters SUMMARY This document contains the factual errors notifications received from States Parties by 2 June 2014 in compliance with paragraph 150 of the Operational Guidelines. This document cancels and replaces the previous one. Alphabetical list by State Party of notifications of factual errors in the evaluation reports of the Advisory Bodies relating to nominations to be examined at the 38th session of the World Heritage Committee (15-25 June 2014) State Party World Heritage nomination ID No. Recommendation Pp Argentina, Bolivia, Qhapaq Ñan, Andean Road System 1459 I 2 Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru Belgium Plantin-Moretus House-Workshops-Museum Complex 1185 Bis N 9 (MBM) Botswana Okavango Delta 1432 I 11 China / Kazakhstan / Silk Roads: Initial Section of the Silk Roads, the Routes 1442 I 14 Kyrgyzstan Network of Tian-shan Corridor China / Kazakhstan / Silk Roads: Initial Section of the Silk Roads, the Routes 1442 I 17 Kyrgyzstan Network of Tian-shan Corridor Denmark Stevns Klint 1416 I 19 France Tectono-volcanic Ensemble of the Chaine des Puys and 1434 N 20 Limagne Fault Germany Carolingian Westwork and Civitas Corvey 1447 R 54 Ghana Tongo-Tengzuk Tallensi Cultural Landscape 1409 D 56 India Rani-ki-Vav (The Queen’s Stepwell) at Patan, Gujarat 922 I 57 Iran (Islamic Republic Shahr-I Sokhta 1456 D 60 of) Iraq Erbil Citadel 1437 D 62 Italy The Vineyard Landscape of Piedmont: Langhe-Roero and 1390 Rev I 67 Monferrato Japan Tomioka Silk Mill and Related Sites 1449 I 68 Mexico Ancient Maya City and Protected Tropical Forests of 1061 Bis D / D 72 Calakmul, Campeche [Extension and renomination of the “Ancient Maya City of Calakmul, Campeche” ] Myanmar Pyu Ancient Cities 1444 D 80 Netherlands Van Nellefabriek 1441 I 90 Palestine Palestine: Land of Olives and Vines – Cultural Landscape of 1492 N 92 Southern Jerusalem, Battir Republic of Korea Namhansanseong 1439 I 95 Russian Federation Bolgar Historical and Archaeological Complex 981 Rev I 97 Turkey Bursa and Cumalıkızık: the Birth of the Ottoman Empire 1452 D 105 Turkey Pergamon and its Multi-Layered Cultural Landscape 1457 D 115 United Arab Emirates Khor Dubai (Dubai Creek) 1458 N 117 United States of Monumental Earthworks of Poverty Point 1435 D 122 America Viet Nam Trang An Landscape Complex 1438 D / D 124 Zambia Barotse Cultural Landscape 1429 D 129 Factual errors notifications are presented in the language in which they have been submitted by the State Party Factual error letters WHC-14/38.COM/INF.8B4.Rev, p. 1 FORM FOR THE SUBMISSION OF FACTUAL ERRORS IN THE ADVISORY BODIES EVALUATIONS (in compliance with Paragraph 150 of the Operational Guidelines) STATE(S) PARTY(IES): Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Perú EVALUATION OF THE NOMINATION OF THE SITE: Qhapaq Ñan, Andean Road System RELEVANT ADVISORY BODY’S EVALUATION: ICOMOS Page, Sentence including the factual Proposed correction by the Comment (if any) by the column, line error State Party Advisory Body and/or of the the World Heritage Advisory (the factual error should be Centre Body highlighted in bold) Evaluation 320,1,1 Qhapaq Ñan Qhapaq Ñan, Andean Road ICOMOS considers this System correction to be an editorial change. 320,1,6 Qhapaq Ñan, Andean Road Qhapaq Ñan, Andean Road ICOMOS considers this System System correction to be an editorial change. 320,1,27 Qhapaq Ñan, Andean Road Qhapaq Ñan, Andean Road ICOMOS considers this System System correction to be an editorial change. 320,1,14 Regiones de Arica Parinacota Regiones de Arica y Parinacota ICOMOS acknowledges this typing error. 321,2,25 are often temples or usnus are often temples or ushnus Usnus are spelled without (ceremonial platforms) but also (ceremonial platforms) but also h in the nomination dossier e.g. p. 109) (and the additional information provided) ICOMOS considers this correction to be an editorial change. 322,1,1 Argentina presents five key Argentina presents five key ICOMOS considers this sections subsections correction to be an editorial change. 322,1,6 These sections are presented in These subsections are presented ICOMOS did not always 20 subsections in three subsections and eleven follow the division of segments. sections, subsections and segments as present in the nomination dossier. It focused mostly on site components – the division supported by the Operational Guidelines and Factual error letters WHC-14/38.COM/INF.8B4.Rev, p. 2 describes these as subsections and archaeological sites. ICOMOS considers that the remaining corrections re-iterate arguments / justification put forward in the nomination dossier that have been fully considered. 322,2,13 Qollayusu Qollasuyu ICOMOS notes that this main road section is spelled in two different versions in the nomination dossier and can also be found as Qollayusu (e.g. p. 245) ICOMOS considers this correction to be an editorial change. 322, 2, 23- Chile has proposed all its network Chile has proposed all its network ICOMOS did not always 24 segments on the level of sub- segments on the level of sub- follow the division of sections rather than sections of sections rather than sections of sections, subsections and which it contributes five: Putre – which it contributes five: Putre – segments as present in the Zapahuira, Incahuasi – Lasana, Zapahuira, Incahuasi – Lasana, nomination dossier. It Cupo –Catarpe, Camar – Peine, Cupo – Catarpe, Camar – Peine, focused mostly on site and Portal del Inca –Finca and Portal del Inca – Finca components – the division Chañaral. These sub-sections are Chañaral. These sub-sections are supported by the presented in 34 segments presented in 34 segments Operational Guidelines and according to dedicated inventory according to dedicated inventory describes these as numbers, 51 component sites and numbers, and include 138 subsections and include 138 associated associated archaeological sites. archaeological sites. archaeological sites. ICOMOS considers that the remaining corrections re-iterate arguments / justification put forward in the nomination dossier that have been fully considered. 322,2, 42 Qollayusu Qollasuyu ICOMOS notes that this main road section is spelled in two different versions in the nomination dossier and can also be found as Qollayusu (e.g. p. 245) ICOMOS considers this correction to be an editorial change. 323, 1, 2-6 Colombia contributes elements in Colombia contributes elements in ICOMOS considers this one section of the Qhapaq Ñan, one section of the Qhapaq Ñan, correction to be an Rumichaca – Pasto, which it Rumichaca – Pasto, divide into 9 editorial change. does not further divide into roadsegments: Rumichaca, San Factual error letters WHC-14/38.COM/INF.8B4.Rev, p. 3 subsections or segments. Pedro, La Cofradía, La Paz, Chitarran, Rosal de Chapal, The section is presented in 9 Guapuscal Bajo, Inantas and Los site components, which do not Ajos. The section do not contain contain any associated any associated archaeological archaeological sites. sites. 323, 1, 25- Perú and Colombia. Among the Perú Ecuador and Colombia. ICOMOS considers that 39 national sections the following Perú needs to be retained are listed: Pulcas - Troya A, Among the binational sections as otherwise the sentence Pulcas - Troya B, Mariscal Sucre shared with Colombia the following would lose its meaning. - El Tambo, La Paz - Quebrada are listed: Rumichaca, Pulcas - Ecuador cannot share a Tupala, Loma Virgen -Chiquito, Troya A, Pulcas - Troya B, binational section with Juan Montalvo - Cabuyal, Pimán Mariscal Sucre - El Tambo, La Paz itself. - Caranqui, Campana Pucará - – Quebrada Tupala, Loma Virgen - Quitoloma, Nagsiche - Panzaleo, Chiquito, Juan Montalvo – Achupallas - Ingapirca, Cabuyal. Ecuador has selected the following subsections and With regard to the other Palcañan Grande - Palcañan corrections, ICOMOS did Chico, El Tambo - Honorato segments: Subsections: Achupallas - Ingapirca, Quebrada not always follow the Vásquez, Cerro de Cojitambo division of sections, (Loma Curiquinga) - Rumiurco, Huatuchi - Plaza del Inca - Las Aradas Segments: Pimán - subsections and segments Pachamama - Llacao, Llaviuco - as present in the Llaviuco, Mamamag - Caranqui, Campana Pucará - Quitoloma, Nagsiche - Panzaleo, nomination dossier. It Mamamag, Paredones - focused mostly on site Paredones, Hierba Buena - San Palcañan Grande - Palcañan Chico, El Tambo - Honorato components – the division Antonio, Santa Martha - Botija supported by the Paqui, Caragshillo - Cañaro - Vázquez, Cerro de Cojitambo (Loma Curiquinga) - Rumiurco, Operational Guidelines and Tuncarta, Oñacapa - Loma de describes these as Paila (la Zarza), Ciudadela - Pachamama - Llacao, Llaviuco - Llaviuco, Mamamag - Mamamag, subsections and Vinoyaco Grande, Quebrada archaeological sites. Huatuchi - Plaza del Inca - Las Paredones - Paredones, Hierba Aradas, Jimbura . Puente Roto, Buena - San Antonio, Santa San José -Llamacanchi - Las Martha - Botija Paqui, Caragshillo - Cañaro - Tuncarta, Oñacapa - ICOMOS considers that Limas. The sections are presented the remaining as 62 site components in 28 Loma de Paila (la Zarza), Ciudadela - Vinoyaco Grande. corrections re-iterate