DOCSLIB.ORG

To Be Removed from This News List, Please Click Here and Put "Unsubscribe" in the Subject Line

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
To Be Removed from This News List, Please Click Here and Put 02/08/2021 NEWS AM -In case you missed it - - - - - This is LONG BUT you Really NEED TO WATCH THIS! Lindell has done a remarkable job of exposing the corruption that has existed in the election process for years and making it understandable for the public. This is focused on the last election, but it has been known by the government for years. This should make heads roll. https://michaeljlindell.com/ Chuppah: Why the Tent? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlIMIxlFmmU "Those in power need checks and restraints lest they come to identify the common good for their own tastes and desires, and their continuation in office as essential to the preservation of the nation." -- Justice William O. Douglas (1898-1980), U. S. Supreme Court Justice Read the Prophets & PRAY WITHOUT CEASING! That is the only hope of this nation! Plead for Grace and Mercy Please That the world would - W A K E U P. remember Time for a worldwide repentance! these folks in ALL US soldiers fighting for our freedom around the world, Pray for those in our prayer- Check often – they government to repent of their wicked corrupt ways. Pray for TR – abnormal Mammogram having double biopsy change Pray for ZH - having trouble with PTSD Pray for LAC – recurrent cancer getting treatment Pray for Ella – emotionally disturbed abused child and brother with ? heart problem Pray for JN – Neuro disease Pray for MS – Job issues and change Pray for BB – Severe West Nile Fever –still not mobile- improving! Pray for RBH – cancer recurrence Pray for Felicia – post op problems – continuing Pray for SH and family – lady’s husband passed away and she is in Nursing home. Not doing well. Pray for MP – Very complex problems Pray that The Holy One will lead you in Your preparations for handling the world problems. – Have YOU made any preparations? Genesis 18:1And Jehovah appeareth unto him among the oaks of Mamre, and he is sitting at the opening of the tent, about the heat of the day; 2and he lifteth up his eyes and looketh, and lo, three men standing by him, and he seeth, and runneth to meet them from the opening of the tent, and boweth himself towards the earth, 3And he saith, `My Lord, if, I pray thee, I have found grace in thine eyes, do not, I pray thee, pass on from thy servant; 4let, I pray thee, a little water be accepted, and wash your feet, and recline under the tree; ETBPF has a new venue called Discord. It is a private web site where we are posting news and the daily news posting and you can respond with posts if you want. This ‘app’ can be used almost like facebook and twitter but without the intervention. We are just starting it and a bit slow to learn how to use it but it helps keep us off the Big Guys. It is a freebee and private. We have set levels of access to make sure only real responsible people are able to access. You can look at and join by going to: https://discord.gg/4576x47ezN On trial during elections? Timetable at stake as Netanyahu back in court Monday Judges will hear defendants’ response to indictment and requests for delay until after March vote; PM, making 2nd court appearance, tells supporters to stay home due to COVID risk By Michael Bachner Today, 10:26 pm After several delays due to the coronavirus lockdown, a much-anticipated court hearing in the corruption trial of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will take place at 9 a.m. Monday at the Jerusalem District Court, with the premier and the other defendants required to attend. The hearing will focus on Netanyahu’s response to the criminal indictment against him and launch the evidentiary stage of the trial. It will be the second time Netanyahu attends a hearing of his trial in person. He will likely be required to verbally confirm the defense filed by his lawyers, who will present a series of verbal arguments in addition to their lengthy written response filed to the court last month. The lawyers are expected to focus on procedural arguments such as the alleged lack of sufficient approval to launch the initial investigations and to issue search warrants for material. The court will also discuss the timetable for the evidentiary stage of the trial, including whether its start will be postponed until after the March 23 Knesset elections and whether Netanyahu will have to physically attend the expected three long hearings per week, which would consume much of his time, while he also manages the country. Two courtrooms have been combined to accommodate the trial. Security will be stepped up and will be similar to other events attended by the prime minister. The public will not be able to watch the proceedings online. CCTV footage will be broadcast to journalists in an adjacent room, and they will report the hearing’s events in written form. Netanyahu faces charges of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust in Case 4000, which involves suspicions that he granted regulatory favors benefiting Shaul Elovitch, the controlling shareholder of Bezeq telecoms, in exchange for positive coverage of the prime minister and his family from the Bezeq-owned Walla news site. Elovitch and his wife, Iris, also face bribery charges in the case, and will also attend Monday’s hearing. Netanyahu also faces charges of fraud and breach of trust in Case 1000, as well as in Case 2000. The former involves suspicions Netanyahu illicitly accepted some $200,000 in gifts such as cigars and champagne from two billionaires — Hollywood-based Israeli movie mogul Arnon Milchan and Australian magnate James Packer. MORE - https://www.timesofisrael.com/on-trial-during-elections-timetable-at-stake-as-netanyahu-back-in-court-monday/ [The circus continues on and on and on. – rdb] Arab Israelis largely unimpressed by Netanyahu’s efforts to woo them — poll But Israel Democracy Institute survey finds that 25% of Arabs think their community should cooperate with the premier By TOI staff Today, 5:37 pm While a large majority of Israelis view Benjamin Netanyahu’s efforts to forge ties with the Arab Israeli public as insincere, fully one-quarter of Arabs think they should nevertheless cooperate with the prime minister, a survey released Sunday found. Netanyahu has publicly declared he hopes to win votes from the Arab community in the March elections and has made a number of high-profile visits to Arab towns in Israel in addition to other gestures aimed at wooing the community. The Israel Democracy Institute poll found that Jewish Israelis take the strategy even less seriously than do Arab Israelis, with 70 percent not believing it’s sincere, compared to 66% of Arabs. Nevertheless, 25% of Arab Israelis and 42% of Jewish Israelis think the Arab leadership should cooperate with the prime minister. The willingness among some in the Arab community to work with Netanyahu comes amid lackluster support for Arab politicians. According to the poll, only 23% of respondents rated the Arab-majority Joint List party’s performance as good or excellent, compared to 38% who rated its performance as not good or poor. That sentiment is strongest among the young Arab public. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announces a new plan to fight crime in Arab Israeli communities on February 3, 2021 (screenshot: YouTube) Only 42% of Arab Israelis are sure or moderately sure which party they will vote for. Fifteen percent of Arab interviewees said they would not vote at all, compared to 3% of the Jewish respondents. The January Israeli Voice Index was compiled by the Viterbi Family Center for Public Opinion and Policy Research of the Israel Democracy Institute. The survey was conducted on the internet and by telephone, with 605 men and women interviewed in Hebrew and 300 interviewed in Arabic. The margin of error was 3.32%, at a confidence level of 95%. After warning that large Arab turnout could cost him his premiership in 2015 and more recently removing the Joint List from the equation entirely to argue that he has the support of the majority of the public, Netanyahu has changed course ahead of the March campaign, seeking to woo Arab voters to support Likud. Analysts are split as to whether he believes the long-neglected minority will actually come out and vote for Likud or whether the premier is seeking to instead lower turnout rates in the sector by dividing its representatives and giving voters the feeling there is little difference between their options. Last week Netanyahu unveiled a long-awaited plan to combat violence and organized crime in Arab Israeli communities. “I cannot imagine a future of the State of Israel which contains a Wild West without law and order, with violence, crime and terror. We will overcome it,” Netanyahu said, pledging NIS 100 million ($32 million) to the issue. Arab Israeli politicians and civil society figures immediately slammed the plan as “too little, too late.” A 2016 government decision to fight organized crime in Arab communities had budgeted NIS 2 billion ($605 million) over four years. Netanyahu said that “a much larger plan” would be passed at a later date, without specifying what would be included or when. On Friday, Netanyahu announced that he intended to appoint Nail Zoabi, whom he picked Thursday as the first-ever Muslim on the Likud party’s Knesset slate, as a minister in his next government. Netanyahu said that Zoabi, a school principal, would be appointed “minister for advancing Arab communities” if Likud forms the next coalition. In previous elections, Netanyahu was accused of racist discrimination toward the Arab communities, most famously with his remarks made on the day of the 2015 elections, in which he urged Likud voters to go vote because “the Arabs are voting in droves.” This was widely seen as a racial dog whistle, implying that Arab citizens of Israel were a traitorous fifth column who, when exercising the right to vote, threatened Israeli security.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
    Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Privatizing Religion: the Transformation of Israel's
    Privatizing religion: The transformation of Israel’s Religious- Zionist community BY Yair ETTINGER The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and policy solutions. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. This paper is part of a series on Imagining Israel’s Future, made possible by support from the Morningstar Philanthropic Fund. The views expressed in this report are those of its author and do not represent the views of the Morningstar Philanthropic Fund, their officers, or employees. Copyright © 2017 Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 U.S.A. www.brookings.edu Table of Contents 1 The Author 2 Acknowlegements 3 Introduction 4 The Religious Zionist tribe 5 Bennett, the Jewish Home, and religious privatization 7 New disputes 10 Implications 12 Conclusion: The Bennett era 14 The Center for Middle East Policy 1 | Privatizing religion: The transformation of Israel’s Religious-Zionist community The Author air Ettinger has served as a journalist with Haaretz since 1997. His work primarily fo- cuses on the internal dynamics and process- Yes within Haredi communities. Previously, he cov- ered issues relating to Palestinian citizens of Israel and was a foreign affairs correspondent in Paris. Et- tinger studied Middle Eastern affairs at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and is currently writing a book on Jewish Modern Orthodoxy.
    [Show full text]
  • David Abrams, Attorney at Law August 21, 2019 To
    David Abrams, Attorney at Law P.O. Box 3353 Church Street Station, New York NY 10008 Tel. 212-897-5821 Fax 212-897-5811 August 21, 2019 To: Internal Revenue Service (by FedEx) Whistleblower Office - ICE 1973 N. Rulon White Blvd. M/S 4110 Ogden, UT 84404 Re: Whistleblower Complaint Against New Israel Fund Dear Sir / Madam: I am the whistleblower in connection with the above-referenced Complaint. Enclosed please find a completed IRS Form 211.. Further, I am respectfully submitting this memorandum to elaborate on the factual and legal aspects of the enclosed IRS whistleblower complaint. In addition, I am enclosing a CD which contains the full, unannotated versions of the documents attached as Exhibits hereto. 1. Who is New Israel Fund? New Israel Fund (“NIF”) is a District of Columbia non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation with its principal place of business in the State of New York, county of New York. NIF financially supports many companies that work to undermine the state of Israel. As set forth in more detail below, NIF has crossed the line from permissible advocacy to unlawful "electioneering." Put another way, NIF is violating the tax codes by attempting to influence the outcome of elections. As stated on its own web site, NIF works on its “concerted campaign to equip Israel’s pro-democracy and progressive forces with the tools to fight Israel’s regressive right-and win.” As set forth in more detail below, NIF's activities are flagrant and unlawful electioneering in violation of the tax code. 2. Who is the Whistleblower? I am a New York attorney and political activist who regularly engages in pro- Israel litigation in state and federal Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Nation-State
    NO. 41 OCTOBER 2018 Introduction Israel’s Nation-State Law Netanyahu Government Lays the Foundations for a Majoritarian System Peter Lintl and Stefan Wolfrum On 19 July 2018, the Israeli parliament passed legislation known as the nation-state law. It is highly controversial in Israel as well as internationally, although strictly speaking there is little new contained in it. Its advocates emphasise that it merely gives expression to existing realities. Critics argue that the law discriminates against minorities, runs counter to democratic values and, in particular, undermines the principle of equality. The debate reveals the social tension in Israel between its ‘Jewish’ and ‘democratic’ identity. In addition, it becomes clear that the main sup- porters of the law on the government side have more far-reaching intentions than its wording suggests. Their aim is to place Jewish collective rights above individual rights and freedoms. The law is, therefore, also a manifestation of current govern- ment policy aimed at leading Israel away from a more liberal democracy and towards a majoritarian democracy. In particular, this policy affects the Supreme Court as a defender of liberal principles. Israel does not have a constitution, instead The law has been a long time coming. it has a set of basic laws that have consti- Since 2011, a variety of different drafts tutional status. This is because since the have been discussed in the Knesset. There state was founded in 1948, there has never was widespread support among the Zionist been any agreement on what precisely the parties for the need to establish the Jewish “Jewish” in the Jewish state is supposed to nation-state character in Israel’s Basic Law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soul from Within Taking a Closer Look
    Vayikra 5769 Volume XVI Number 26 Toras Aish Thoughts From Across the Torah Spectrum make for you a Sanctuary and I will dwell within it? Why RABBI MORDECHAI WEISS does it say that I will dwell "within them?" The Soul From Within Our Sages respond that the language brings hen analyzing the book of Vayikra, one is faced home the point that the sanctuary alone has no with perplexing and disturbing questions. meaning unless it dwells within each person. We must WBesides the obvious questions as to why the have the Proper Kavannah (intent and thoughts) and torah devotes so much space to describing these soul for the Sanctuary to have any meaning. It must be Karbanot (sacrifices) and yet for the past two thousand "betocham" within us! Often the prophets rebuke the years these laws have little application or meaning to a Jewish people by saying "Why do I need your sacrifices practicing Jew- there is also a question of priorities. saith the L-rd". For if there is no intent then one's One only needs to look at the pomp and beauty of the sacrifices are worthless! Mishkan (tabernacle) and later the Holy Temples built The Jewish home is also called a Sanctuary. by King Solomon and later by Ezra and beatified by On the outside it must appear beautiful and special. But King Herod, to ask the question; doesn't this gaudiness if there is no warmth and love, if there is no caring and and pageantry border on arrogance? Do we need a sensitivity on the inside, then it can be equated to an Mishkan made of gold and silver and fine linens to empty shell.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of Annexation for Israel's Rule Over Palestinians
    DRAFT Implications of Annexation for Israel’s Rule Over Palestinians Introduction The last few years have seen increasing discussion of Israeli annexation of Palestinian territory in the West Bank. With the recent formation of a unity government between Benjamin Netanyahu and Benny Gantz, the terms of which allow for the advancement of annexation ​ legislation as soon as this summer, as well as ongoing work of a joint US-Israel mapping committee that was formed following the release of the Trump Plan, questions remain as to which territory could be annexed, how annexation would be carried out, and what such a move would mean for the nature of Israel’s regime/s between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. This document will attempt to lay out the possibilities that lie ahead and explain some of the implications of annexation for Israel’s governance, as well as the impact it could have on the ground. Context In the territory between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River, there are today around 7 million Jews and 7 million Palestinians. Since 1967, Israel has ruled over this entire territory, which includes controlling Palestinian residents in Israel proper, the West Bank (including East Jerusalem), and the Gaza Strip. This paper will focus primarily on the West Bank, where Israel has controlled Palestinian residents via a system of military rule, which has, since its beginning, advanced de facto annexation and today is moving towards formal de jure annexation. ​ ​ ​ ​ In discussing the de jure annexation options currently under Israel’s consideration, it is ​ ​ important to note that in none of them will Israelis and Palestinians have equality in their civil and political rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Religious Right and the Question Of
    ISRAEL’S RELIGIOUS RIGHT AND THE QUESTION OF SETTLEMENTS Middle East Report N°89 – 20 July 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. NATIONAL-RELIGIOUS FRAGMENTATION AND RADICALISATION............ 3 III. THE TIME OF THE ULTRA-ORTHODOX............................................................... 12 IV. JEWISH ACTIVIST TOOLS ........................................................................................ 17 A. RHETORIC OR REALITY? ............................................................................................................17 B. INSTITUTIONAL LEVERAGE ........................................................................................................17 1. Political representation...............................................................................................................17 2. The military................................................................................................................................20 3. Education ...................................................................................................................................24 C. A PARALLEL SYSTEM ................................................................................................................25 V. FROM CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE TO VIOLENCE ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Right of the Jewish People to the Land of Israel
    The Right of the Jewish People to the Land of Israel American Zionist Youth Foundation, Inc. THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE & la ustein Library THE RIGHT OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE TO THE LAND OF ISRAEL BACKGROUND PAPERS FOR AN EVALUATION (NO. 2) ZIONISM Background Papers for an Evaluation (No. 2) The Right of the Jewish People to the Land of Israel Whose is the Land. " Moshe Beilinson״ .1 Our Relations ־ Our Right to the Land" .2 A. D. Gordon with the Arabs. " Prof. Benzion Dinur 3. "Our Rights Over the Land of Israel. " 4. "ThTerritoriese Mitzvot. , " the Messiah and the MichaelRosenak 5. "The Five Roots of Israel - The Arab Case Answered. " Nissim Rejwan 6. "Who Has the Rights Over the Land of Israel. " A. Heller 7. "This Country Made Us a People, Our People Made This Country. " David Ben-Gurion 8. "The Rights of the Jewish People in Abba Eban the Land of Israel. " Yitzak Tabenkin ״ .Concerning Our Rights to the Land" .9 Arnold J. Toynbee 10. "Jewish Rights in Palestine. " Solomon Zeitlin 11. "Jewish Rights in Eretz Israel. " I A, 2 WHOSE IS THE LAND? by Moshe Beilinson To whom does the land belong? To the Jewish people and to the Arab community living there. This assumption must be the basis of Zionist and British policy. The first para- graph of the Balfour Declaration is based on it, and so is the Mandate. The latter charges the Government with concern for the Jewish people, establishing its national homeland in the country, and for the Arab population of the country, whose rights must not be ignored and whose development must be fostered.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Flawed Electoral System
    Israel’s Flawed Electoral System: Obstacle to Peace and Democracy Alex Bain Policy Brief ✹ No. 32 ✹ February 2011 Middle East Institute Policy Brief • www.mei.edu 1 © Middle East Institute 2011. All rights reserved. Distribution of this work is per- mitted for non-commercial use, unmodified, with attribution to the Middle East Institute. The Middle East Institute does not take positions on Middle East policy; the views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute, its employees, or its trustees. For more publications from the Middle East Institute: http://mei.edu/Publications/WebPublications.aspx Cover Photo: The Knesset in 1986 (Itzik Edri). The Middle East Institute 1761 N St. NW Washington, DC 20036 Tel: 202-785-1141 Fax: 202-881-8861 www.mei.edu About the Author Alex Bain is a senior at Williams College, where he majors in political science. He spent his junior year abroad at Oxford University. In the summer of 2010, he worked as an intern for the Foundation for Middle East Peace. The author would like to thank Waseem Mardini for his advice and corrections and Ambassador Philip C. Wilcox, Jr. for his extensive editing, wisdom, and insight into Israeli politics and the peace process. Any faults or inaccuracies in this paper are the author’s alone. Abstract This Policy Brief examines the history of Israel’s electoral system and its impact on the peace process. Israel’s deeply flawed electoral system is an obstacle to reversing its ill-fated settlement and occupation policies and to making peace with the Palestinians.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Jewish Minorities and Their Access to Israeli Citizenship. Demographic Threat Perceptions and Ensuing State Strategies
    Introduction Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Comments Non-Jewish Minorities and Their Access to Israeli Citizenship WP S Demographic Threat Perceptions and Ensuing State Strategies Lidia Averbukh On Independence Day in May 2016, the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics announced that the Israeli population had increased tenfold since the State’s establishment in 1948. Leading national newspapers rejoiced that the population has multiplied from an initial 800,000 to almost 8.5 million, a figure ascribable to the highest birth rate in the western world among other facts, such as Jewish immigration. This, in turn, can be attributed to the fact that the state seeks to preserve and promote the country’s Jewish majority. The downside of this policy is the discrimination of minorities living in Israel, which are deemed a demographic threat. This applies not only to Arab Israelis, but also to the growing number of foreign workers who replace labour forces from the Palestinian territories, and to African refugees whose legal integration within the Israeli citizenship system is not foreseen. Less exclusive access to citizenship and the secure legal status of non-Jewish population groups is likely only to be possible if they are no longer viewed as a threat. The Basic Laws passed in the 1990s define adopted by members of the current govern- Israel as a state which is both Jewish and ment, such as the Zionist-nationalist party democratic. A similar concept is already Likud, as well as the party Yisrael Beiteinu, mentioned in the Declaration of Independ- with its base of secular, Russian-speaking ence of 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Events in Israel and Palestine Appendices Iemed
    Chronologies Chronology of Events in Israel Appendices and Palestine In Israel, 2019 is a year with an elec- iteinu. And the other is the centrist can- the hope of avoiding a possible trial toral focus, with the country holding two didate Kajol Lavan (Blue and White) and, in turn, refloating negotiations to legislative elections. The economic formed by Benny Gantz’s centrist Ho- form a government, given that the three slowdown, the corruption scandals in- sen L’Israel (Resilience for Israel), Yahir court cases constitute one of the main volving the Prime Minister and Likud Lapid’s Yesh Atid (There Is a Future) stumbling blocks. However, after the leader Benjamin Netanyahu and the and Moshe Yaalon’s Telem (National hearings, in November the public pros- relentless divisions in the most con- Statesmanlike Movement). A draw in ecutor decides to officially indict Net- servative coalition government in Is- the elections, with both alliances taking anyahu for accepting bribes, fraud and Chronology in Events of Israel and Palestine raeli history formed by Likud (Consoli- 35 seats each, forces Netanyahu to ne- breach of trust. At the end of December, dation, conservative), Kulanu (All of Us, gotiate a coalition government again the sitting Prime Minister announces his centre-right), HaBayit HaYehudi (Jew- with the ultra-Orthodox and extreme intention to file an appeal before the ish Home, ultra-nationalist), Yahadut right-wing parties. An agreement is not Knesset in order to safeguard his par- Hatorah (United Torah Judaism, ultra- forthcoming, and so on 29 May new liamentary immunity. orthodox Ashkenazi) and Shas (World- elections are scheduled for 17 Septem- The successive demonstrations of the wide Association of Torah-Observant ber.
    [Show full text]
  • STATED POLITICAL POSITIONS and KEY FACTS Likud Places a Strong Emphasis on Security and Presents Prime Minister Netanyahu As
    IDEOLOGICAL STATED POLITICAL POSITIONS AND PARTY PARTY LEADER ORIENTATION KEY FACTS Likud Benjamin Netanyahu Right Likud places a strong emphasis on (Prime Minister) security and presents Prime Minister Netanyahu as the only viable leader with a proven track record on security. Netanyahu has been on record in 2009 in support of the two-state solution although more recently he has displayed ambivalence. The party has a fiscally conservative economic agenda, though this is secondary to security-diplomatic issues. HaBayit HaYehudi TBD Right The party is considered to be the most (The Jewish Home) hawkish partner of the current coalition. It represents religious-Zionists and territorial nationalists, is staunchly opposed to a Palestinian state, and actively promotes the expansion of settlements and Israeli annexation of Area C in the West Bank. Broadly centrist economic agenda appealing to the Jewish mainstream. In December 2018, party leader Naftali Bennett announced he and Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked would be leaving to form The New Right. Hayemin Hachadash Naftali Bennett Right A new party formed by former Jewish (The New Right) (Education and Jewish Home ministers Naftali Bennett and Diaspora Minister) and Ayelet Shaked. The party was formed Ayelet Shaked (Justice because of Bennet and Shaked’s long- Minister) held ambition to win more secular, middle-class Israeli voters – a mission hampered by Jewish Home’s affiliation with the National-Religious sector and the influence of settler Rabbis. Bennett and Shaked are opposed to a two-state solution, support the expansion of settlements and Israeli annexation of Area C in the West Bank. Yisrael Beiteinu Avigdor Lieberman Right The party is a Jewish nationalist party (Israel is our home) (former Defence dominated by its leader, Avigdor Minister) Lieberman.
    [Show full text]