DOCSLIB.ORG

61St International Astronautical Congress 2010 (IAC 2010)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
61St International Astronautical Congress 2010 (IAC 2010) 61st International Astronautical Congress 2010 (IAC 2010) Prague, Czech Republic 27 September-1 October 2010 Volume 1 of 13 ISBN: 978-1-61782-368-8 Printed from e-media with permission by: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 Some format issues inherent in the e-media version may also appear in this print version. Copyright© (2010) by the International Astronautical Federation All rights reserved. Printed by Curran Associates, Inc. (2011) For permission requests, please contact the International Astronautical Federation at the address below. International Astronautical Federation 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren 75015 PARIS - France Phone: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 [email protected] Additional copies of this publication are available from: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 USA Phone: 845-758-0400 Fax: 845-758-2634 Email: [email protected] Web: www.proceedings.com TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 A1.1 BEHAVIOUR, PERFORMANCE AND PSYCHOSOCIAL ISSUES IN SPACE SESSION #1 RESOLUTION OF PSYCHOSOCIAL CRISES ASSOCIATED WITH FLYING IN SPACE................................................................1 Jelena Brcic DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF A SIMPLE, RAPID, AND OBJECTIVE BEHAVIORAL ASSAY OF GROUP COHESION IN SIMULATED ASTRONAUT CREWS..............................................................................................................22 Pete Roma HIGH VERSUS LOW CREWMEMBER AUTONOMY DURING A 105-DAY MARS SIMULATION MISSION ..........................34 Nick Kanas SOME PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL ASPECTS OF ADAPTATION TO SIMULATED AUTONOMOUS MISSION TO MARS ........................................................................................................................................................38 Vadim Gushin PERSONAL VALUES AND CREW COMPATIBILITY IN A 105 DAYS SPACE SIMULATION STUDY......................................44 Gro Mjeldheim Sandal INDIVIDUAL SUBCONSCIOUS ADAPTIVE PROCESSES TO THE MARTIAN FLIGHT SIMULATION...................................60 Yuri Bubeev NEUROCOGNITIVE EFFECTS OF A 3D VIRTUAL REALITY MOOD INDUCTION SYSTEM IN MARS-500 CHAMBER. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................61 Gabriel G. De La Torre COUNTERMEASURES: NON-NUTRITIVE BENEFITS OF GROWING AND TENDING PLANTS DURING THE 500-DAY CHAMBER SIMULATION .................................................................................................................................................75 Scott Bates THE SIGNIFICANCE OF FATIGUE IN SPACEFLIGHT .......................................................................................................................76 Laura Drudi A3.2A MOON EXPLORATION – PART 1 SESSION #2 SMART-1 NEW RESULTS AND LESSONS FOR FUTURE LUNAR EXPLORATION......................................................................89 Bernard Foing CHANDRAYAAN-1 MISSION: SIGNIFICANT SCIENCE RESULTS...................................................................................................90 Jitendra Goswami THE LUNAR RECONNAISSANCE ORBITER: BEGINNING THE SCIENCE MISSION AFTER THE EXPLORATION MISSION............................................................................................................................................................................91 John Keller A MINIATURE LASER INDUCED BREAKDOWN SPECTROSCOPE (MINI-LIBS) FOR LUNAR SURFACE EXPLORATION ..............................................................................................................................................................................................92 A. S. Laxmiprasad IN-SITU AGE DETERMINATION OF PLANETARY SURFACE USING THE 40AR-39AR METHOD .......................................101 P. Hofmann UPDATE ON THE GOOGLE LUNAR X PRIZE......................................................................................................................................105 William Pomerantz THE TEAM ITALIA ANSWER TO THE GOOGLE LUNAR X PRIZE CHALLENGE: THE AMALIA PROJECT CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PHASE RESULTS........................................................................................................................106 Michèle Lavagna FEASIBILITY STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE WHITE LABEL SPACE GLXP MISSION .............................108 Juergen Schlutz OPEN SOURCE MISSION TO THE MOON ............................................................................................................................................121 Dominik Quantius ANALYSIS OF LANDING SITE ATTRIBUTES FOR FUTURE MISSIONS TARGETING THE RIM OF THE LUNAR SOUTH POLE AITKEN BASIN...................................................................................................................................................125 David Koebel A6.1 MEASUREMENTS SESSION #3 OBSERVATION TECHNIQUES MADE THROUGH THE KAMISAIBARA RADAR .....................................................................135 Chikako Hirose REQUIREMENTS OF INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANISATION FOR A MULTI OBJECT TRACKING RADAR............................................................................................................................................................................................................141 M. Y. S. Prasad METHOD FOR DETERMINING SPACECRAFT ATTITUDE STABILITY BASED ON RCS........................................................146 Wei Niu THE FIRST ITALIAN-RUSSIAN OBSERVATORY FOR SPACE DEBRIS MONITORING...........................................................151 Fabrizio Piergentili ORBITAL DEBRIS DETECTION AND TRACKING STRATEGIES FOR THE NASA/AFRL METER CLASS AUTONOMOUS TELESCOPE (MCAT) ...................................................................................................................................................157 Mark Mulrooney CHARACTERIZATION OF GEO AND HEO OBJECTS USING MULTI-YEAR STATISTICS ON BRIGHTNESS MEASUREMENTS.............................................................................................................................................................167 Vladimir Agapov PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF HIGH AMR DEBRIS BY OPTICAL REFLECTANCE SPECTROMETRY ........................................................................................................................................................................................174 Thomas Schildknecht TIME-RESOLVED INFRARED SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC OBSERVATIONS OF HIGH AREA TO MASS RATIO (HAMR) OBJECTS IN GEO..........................................................................................................................................................181 Mark Skinner ANALYSIS OF OBSERVED AND SIMULATED LIGHT CURVES OF SPACE DEBRIS ................................................................194 Carolin Früh DATA COLLECTED DURING THE POST-FLIGHT SURVEY OF MICROMETEOROID AND ORBITAL DEBRIS IMPACT FEATURES ON THE HUBBLE WIDE FIELD PLANETARY CAMERA 2.......................................................204 John Opiela STATUS REPORT OF DEVELOPMENT OF A SENSOR FOR IN-SITU SPACE DUST MEASUREMENT.................................210 Yukihito Kitazawa B2.1 ADVANCED SYSTEMS SESSION #4 ADVANCED BROADBAND COMMUNICATION-BROADCASTING CONVERGENCE SATELLITE.......................................211 Jae Woo Park SPACE INDUSTRY INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIC REGIONS OF RUSSIA............................................................................................................................................................................................................214 Nikolay Sevastiyanov RESULTS OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY INTO THE SPACE-BASED DETECTION OF AIS SIGNALS ON AN OPERATIONAL BASIS................................................................................................................................................................................217 Frank Te Hennepe A HIGHLY EFFICIENT MULTIPLE ACCESS SYSTEM FOR SATELLITE INTER NETWORKING APPLICATIONS............................................................................................................................................................................................227 Manfred Wittig AN EFFECTIVE ROUTE CONTROL METHOD ON MULTI-LAYERED SATELLITE NETWORKS.........................................238 Yuta Tada HIGH CAPACITY FEEDER LINKS ..........................................................................................................................................................244 Manfred Wittig ALPHABUS, A SUCCESSFUL EUROPEAN PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP ...........................................................................250 Thibery Cussac Q/V-BAND COMMUNICATIONS AND NAVIGATION EXPERIMENTS USING ALPHASAT .....................................................258 Otto Koudelka RESULTS OF THE OPTICAL LINK BETWEEN THE OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS TELESCOPE LABORATORY AND THE OPTICAL INTER-SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING TEST SATELLITE....................................................................................................................................................................................................268 Keith Wilson RESULTS OF KIRARI OPTICAL COMMUNICATION DEMONSTRATION EXPERIMENTS WITH THE NICT OPTICAL GROUND STATION (KODEN) AIMING FOR FUTURE CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM COMMUNICATIONS IN SPACE ...............................................................................................................................................................273
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spaceflight a British Interplanetary Society Publication
    SpaceFlight A British Interplanetary Society publication Volume 61 No.2 February 2019 £5.25 Sun-skimmer phones home Rolex in space Skyrora soars ESA uploads 02> to the ISS 634089 From polar platform 770038 to free-flier 9 CONTENTS Features 18 Satellites, lightning trackers and space robots Space historian Gerard van de Haar FBIS has researched the plethora of European payloads carried to the International Space Station by SpaceX Dragon capsules. He describes the wide range of scientific and technical experiments 4 supporting a wide range of research initiatives. Letter from the Editor 24 In search of a role Without specific planning, this Former scientist and spacecraft engineer Dr Bob issue responds to an influx of Parkinson MBE, FBIS takes us back to the news about unmanned space vehicles departing, dying out and origins of the International Space Station and arriving at their intended explains his own role in helping to bring about a destinations. Pretty exciting stuff British contribution – only to see it migrate to an – except the dying bit because it unmanned environmental monitoring platform. appears that Opportunity, roving around Mars for more than 14 30 Shake, rattle and Rolex 18 years, has finally succumbed to a On the 100th anniversary of the company’s birth, global dust storm. Philip Corneille traces the international story Some 12 pages of this issue are behind a range of Rolex watches used by concerned with aspects of the astronauts and cosmonauts in training and in International Space Station, now well into its stride as a research space, plus one that made it to the Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • APSCC Monthly E-Newsletter JUNE 2017
    APSCC Monthly e-Newsletter JUNE 2017 The Asia-Pacific Satellite Communications Council (APSCC) e-Newsletter is produced on a monthly basis as part of APSCC’s information services for members and professionals in the satellite industry. Subscribe to the APSCC monthly newsletter and be updated with the latest satellite industry news as well as APSCC activities! To renew your subscription, please visit www.apscc.or.kr/sub4_5.asp. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with a title “Unsubscribe.” News in this issue has been collected from 1 May to 31 May. INSIDE APSCC APSCC 2017 Satellite Conference & Exhibition, 10-12 October, Tokyo, Japan The APSCC Satellite Conference and Exhibition is Asia’s must-attend executive conference for the satellite and space industry, where business leaders come together to gain market insight, strike partnerships and conclude major deals. Celebrating its 20th annual event APSCC 2017 #SATECHexplorer will incorporate industry veterans and new players through the 3-day of in-depth conference program to reach out to a broader audience. Join APSCC 2017 and expand your business network while hearing from a broad range of thought-provoking panels and speakers representing visionary ideas and years of business experience in the industry. For more information, please visit www.apscc2017.com SATELLITE BUSINESS Comtech EF Data Announces Deployments Valued at $1.6 Million of Heights Networking Products in Asia May 1, 2017 - Comtech Telecommunications Corp. announced that three different customers of Comtech EF Data Corp., which is part of Comtech's Commercial Solutions segment, have installed, accepted and are now using the industry-leading Heights Networking Platform to support their business needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa Engineering & Safety Center
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA ENGINEERING & SAFETY CENTER 2008 TECHNICAL UPDATE www.nasa.gov 1 It gives me a lot of pleasure to recognize the 5th anniversary of the establishment of the NASA Engineering and Safety Center. It also offers, for me, a valuable reminder that it is important always to be open to new ideas and new approaches to solving problems. When the NESC was established, I was more than a bit pessimistic that it could work, that it could provide value for the Agency over and above that offered by our various center engineering directorates. I was wrong. The synergy that has been achieved by the NESC and its cross-agency approach to solving difficult technical problems has been truly impressive. It is, in my mind, a useful model for future endeavors and a great example that it is actually possible for us to “be NASA”, to rise above some of the parochial geographic concerns which have plagued NASA for five decades. These days, when someone tells me that the NESC is looking at a particular issue, I am reassured, because I know that if a solution can be found, this group will find it. – Dr. Michael D. Griffin, NASA Administrator 2 Table of Contents Stakeholder Messages ........................................................................................ 2 NESC Leadership ................................................................................................ 3 Overview: How the NESC Works .......................................................................... 4 NESC Academy: Learning from the Past ............................................................... 8 Technical Highlights Collecting Flight Force Measurements to Improve Coupled Loads Analysis ... 11 Analysis of Constellation Program Mass Properties ....................................... 11 Prediction and Reduction of Ares SRB Thrust Oscillation ............................... 12 Review of the Launch Abort System Motor Qualification Plan .......................
    [Show full text]
  • The New Space Science DLR Institute in Bremen and Fundamental Physics
    The DLR-Institute of Space Systems (DLR-RY) and Fundamental Physics Hansjörg Dittus Folie 1 Institute of Space Systems Mission ………… ……The Institute develops concepts for innovative space missions on high national and international standard. Space based applications needed for scienctific, commercial and security-relevant purposes will be developed and carried out in cooperative projects with other research institutions and industry.…………… Folie 2 GG-WS, Pisa, 12.2.2010 Institute of Space Systems (DLR-RY) Structure System Analysis Space Transportation Navigation System Analysis and Orbital Systems Control Systems Transport and System Test Propulsion and Systems Verifiaction Orbital Systems and Science Missions Security Exploration Avionic Systems Systems Folie 3 GG-WS, Pisa, 12.2.2010 AsteoridFinder / Start Phase B Mission statement: TheAsteroidFinder Mission observes the population of Near Earth Objects (NEOs), in particular IEOs (Inner Earth Objects / Interior to Earth’s orbit objects) wrt: •Number of objects •Orbit distribution and orbit parameters (ephemeris) •Scale distribution Sun System Lead, Institute of Space Systems, DLR-RY Instrument development (telescope) and scientific lead, Institute of Planetary Research, DLR-PF 6 more DLR Institutes contributing: RM, RB, DFD, FA, ME, SC Earth Scheduled launch: 2012 spacecraft orbiting the Earth Folie 4 GG-WS, Pisa, 12.2.2010 AsteoridFinder Telescope Sun shield apertur Radiator Payload segment (Sensor) Elektronic segment Service segment (Batteries, Reaction wheels, Antennas) SSO (600 – 800
    [Show full text]
  • The Space-Based Global Observing System in 2010 (GOS-2010)
    WMO Space Programme SP-7 The Space-based Global Observing For more information, please contact: System in 2010 (GOS-2010) World Meteorological Organization 7 bis, avenue de la Paix – P.O. Box 2300 – CH 1211 Geneva 2 – Switzerland www.wmo.int WMO Space Programme Office Tel.: +41 (0) 22 730 85 19 – Fax: +41 (0) 22 730 84 74 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.wmo.int/pages/prog/sat/ WMO-TD No. 1513 WMO Space Programme SP-7 The Space-based Global Observing System in 2010 (GOS-2010) WMO/TD-No. 1513 2010 © World Meteorological Organization, 2010 The right of publication in print, electronic and any other form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts from WMO publications may be reproduced without authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, reproduce or translate these publication in part or in whole should be addressed to: Chairperson, Publications Board World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 7 bis, avenue de la Paix Tel.: +41 (0)22 730 84 03 P.O. Box No. 2300 Fax: +41 (0)22 730 80 40 CH-1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] FOREWORD The launching of the world's first artificial satellite on 4 October 1957 ushered a new era of unprecedented scientific and technological achievements. And it was indeed a fortunate coincidence that the ninth session of the WMO Executive Committee – known today as the WMO Executive Council (EC) – was in progress precisely at this moment, for the EC members were very quick to realize that satellite technology held the promise to expand the volume of meteorological data and to fill the notable gaps where land-based observations were not readily available.
    [Show full text]
  • Cislunar Tether Transport System
    FINAL REPORT on NIAC Phase I Contract 07600-011 with NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts, Universities Space Research Association CISLUNAR TETHER TRANSPORT SYSTEM Report submitted by: TETHERS UNLIMITED, INC. 8114 Pebble Ct., Clinton WA 98236-9240 Phone: (206) 306-0400 Fax: -0537 email: [email protected] www.tethers.com Report dated: May 30, 1999 Period of Performance: November 1, 1998 to April 30, 1999 PROJECT SUMMARY PHASE I CONTRACT NUMBER NIAC-07600-011 TITLE OF PROJECT CISLUNAR TETHER TRANSPORT SYSTEM NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION (Firm Name, Mail Address, City/State/Zip Tethers Unlimited, Inc. 8114 Pebble Ct., Clinton WA 98236-9240 [email protected] PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Robert P. Hoyt, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The Phase I effort developed a design for a space systems architecture for repeatedly transporting payloads between low Earth orbit and the surface of the moon without significant use of propellant. This architecture consists of one rotating tether in elliptical, equatorial Earth orbit and a second rotating tether in a circular low lunar orbit. The Earth-orbit tether picks up a payload from a circular low Earth orbit and tosses it into a minimal-energy lunar transfer orbit. When the payload arrives at the Moon, the lunar tether catches it and deposits it on the surface of the Moon. Simultaneously, the lunar tether picks up a lunar payload to be sent down to the Earth orbit tether. By transporting equal masses to and from the Moon, the orbital energy and momentum of the system can be conserved, eliminating the need for transfer propellant. Using currently available high-strength tether materials, this system could be built with a total mass of less than 28 times the mass of the payloads it can transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Science Fun Neu-S­Tre­Litz, Oberpfaffen­Hofen, Stade, Stuttgart, Trauen and Weilheim
    About DLR Magazine of DLR, the German Aerospace Center · www.DLR.de/en · No. 136/137 · April 2013 DLR, the German Aerospace Center, is Germany’s national research centre for aeronautics and space. Its extensive research and development work in aeronautics, space, energy, transport and security is integrated into national and interna- tional cooperative ventures. In addition to its own research, as Germany’s space agency, DLR has No. 136/137 · April 2013 G been given responsibility by the federal govern- ma azıne ment for the planning and implementation of the German space programme. DLR is also the umbrella organisation for the nation’s largest pro- ject execution organisation. DLR has approximately 7400 employees at 16 locations in Germany: Cologne (Headquarters), Augsburg, Berlin, Bonn, Braunschweig, Bremen, Göttingen, Hamburg, Jülich, Lampoldshausen, Making science fun Neu-s tre litz, Oberpfaffen hofen, Stade, Stuttgart, Trauen and Weilheim. DLR also has offices in Brussels, Paris, Tokyo and Washington DC. Head of the DLR_School_Lab Bremen, Dirk Stiefs Imprint DLR Magazine – the magazine of the German Aerospace Center Publisher: DLR German Aerospace Center (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt) Editorial staff: Sabine Hoffmann (Legally responsi- ble for editorial content), Cordula Tegen, Marco Trovatello (Editorial management), Karin Ranero Celius, Peter Clissold (English-language Editors, EJR-Quartz BV) In this edition, contributions from: Manuela Braun, Dorothee Bürkle, Falk Dambowsky, Merel Groentjes, Elisabeth Mittelbach, Andreas Schütz and Melanie-Konstanze Wiese. DLR Corporate Communications Linder Höhe D 51147 Cologne Phone: +49 (0) 2203 601 2116 Fax: +49 (0) 2203 601 3249 Email: [email protected] www.DLR.de/dlr-magazine Printing: Druckerei Thierbach, D 45478 Mülheim an der Ruhr Design: CD Werbeagentur GmbH, D 53842 Troisdorf, www.cdonline.de ISSN 2190-0108 To order and read online: www.DLR.de/magazine The DLR Magazine is also available as an interactive app for iPad and Android tablets in the iTunes and Google Play Store, or as a PDF file.
    [Show full text]
  • Another Global History of Science: Making Space for India and China
    BJHS: Themes 1: 115–143, 2016. © British Society for the History of Science 2016. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/bjt.2016.4 First published online 22 March 2016 Another global history of science: making space for India and China ASIF SIDDIQI* Abstract. Drawing from recent theoretical insights on the circulation of knowledge, this article, grounded in real-world examples, illustrates the importance of ‘the site’ as an analytical heur- istic for revealing processes, movements and connections illegible within either nation-centred histories or comparative national studies. By investigating place instead of project, the study reframes the birth of modern rocket developments in both China and India as fundamentally intertwined within common global networks of science. I investigate four seemingly discon- nected sites in the US, India, China and Ukraine, each separated by politics but connected and embedded in conduits that enabled the flow of expertise during (and in some cases despite) the Cold War. By doing so, it is possible to reconstruct an exemplar of a kind of global history of science, some of which takes place in China, some in India, and some else- where, but all of it connected. There are no discrete beginnings or endings here, merely points of intervention to take stock of processes in action. Each site produces objects and knowledge that contribute to our understanding of the other sites, furthering the overall narra- tive on Chinese and Indian efforts to formalize a ‘national’ space programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Ssc09-Xii-03
    SSC09-XII-03 The Promise of Innovation from University Space Systems: Are We Meeting It? Michael Swartwout St. Louis University 3450 Lindell Boulevard St. Louis, Missouri 63103; (314) 977-8240 [email protected] ABSTRACT A popular notion among universities is that we are innovation-drivers in the staid, risk-adverse spacecraft industry – we are to professional small satellites what small satellites are to the “battlestars”. By contrast, professional industry takes a much different perspective on university-class spacecraft; these programs are good for attracting students to space and providing valuable pre-career training, but the actual flight missions are ancillary, even unimportant. Which opinion is correct? Both are correct. The vast majority of the 111 student-built spacecraft that have flown have made no innovative contributions. That is not to say that they have been without contribution. In addition to the inarguable benefits to education, many have served as radio Amateur communications, science experiments and even technological demonstrations. But “innovative”? Not so much. However, there have been two innovative contributors, whose contributions are large enough to settle the question: the University of Surrey begat SSTL, which helped create the COTS-based small satellite industry. Stanford and Cal Poly begat CubeSats, whose contributions are still being created today. This paper provides an update to our earlier submissions on the history of student-built spacecraft. Major trends identified in previous years will be re-examined with new data -- especially the bifurcation between larger-scale, larger-scope "flagship" programs and small-scale, reduced-mission "independents". In particular, we will demonstrate that the general history of student-built spacecraft has not been one of innovation, nor of development of new space systems -- with those few, extremely noteworthy, exceptions.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MAX LAUNCH ABORT SYSTEM – CONCEPT, FLIGHT TEST, and EVOLUTION Michael G
    THE MAX LAUNCH ABORT SYSTEM – CONCEPT, FLIGHT TEST, AND EVOLUTION Michael G. Gilbert(1), PhD (1) Principal Engineer, NASA Engineering and Safety Center 11 Langley Blvd., MS 116,Hampton VA 23681 USA Email:[email protected] Abstract escape system Maxime Faget [1]. The effort was intended to provide The NASA Engineering and Safety Center programmatic risk-reduction for the (NESC) is an independent engineering Constellation Program (CxP) Orion Crew analysis and test organization providing Exploration Vehicle (CEV) project. support across the range of NASA programs. In 2007 NASA was developing The CEV project baseline Launch Abort the launch escape system for the Orion System (LAS) development is an evolution spacecraft that was evolved from the of the Apollo towered-rocket design, Fig. traditional tower-configuration escape 2. Unlike the Apollo LAS, the CEV LAS systems used for the historic Mercury and incorporated an attitude control motor to Apollo spacecraft. The NESC was tasked, ensure stable flight following the escape as a programmatic risk-reduction effort to motor burn. At the time the MLAS project develop and flight test an alternative to the was initiated, the CEV LAS was Orion baseline escape system concept. experiencing development delays related This project became known as the Max to the LAS attitude control motor. Launch Abort System (MLAS), named in Therefore, the MLAS project was to honor of Maxime Faget, the developer of consider escape system concepts that the original Mercury escape system. Over would not require active attitude control or the course of approximately two years the stabilization following escape motor NESC performed conceptual and tradeoff burnout.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Strategies and Methodologies for the Max Launch Abort System Dawn M
    Testing Strategies and Methodologies for the Max Launch Abort System Dawn M. Schaible Daniel E. Yuchnovicz NASA Engineering and Safety Center Hampton, Virginia ABSTRACT The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) was tasked to develop an alternate, tower-less launch abort system (LAS) as risk mitigation for the Orion Project. The successful pad abort flight demonstration test in July 2009 of the “Max” launch abort system (MLAS) provided data critical to the design of future LASs, while demonstrating the Agency’s ability to rapidly design, build and fly full-scale hardware at minimal cost in a “virtual” work environment. Limited funding and an aggressive schedule presented a challenge for testing of the complex MLAS system. The successful pad abort flight demonstration test was attributed to the project’s systems engineering and integration process, which included: a concise definition of, and an adherence to, flight test objectives; a solid operational concept; well defined performance requirements, and a test program tailored to reducing the highest flight test risks. The testing ranged from wind tunnel validation of computational fluid dynamic simulations to component ground tests of the highest risk subsystems. This paper provides an overview of the testing/risk management approach and methodologies used to understand and reduce the areas of highest risk — resulting in a successful flight demonstration test. KEY WORDS: Testing, risk management, flight test, launch abort systems MLAS PROJECT OVERVIEW NASA’s next generation crewed spacecraft, named Orion, is a part of the overall Constellation Program. The baseline Orion design includes a launch abort system (LAS) with tower, derived from the Apollo design.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Suborbital Flights - Air Or Space Law?
    COMMERCIAL SUBORBITAL FLIGHTS - AIR OR SPACE LAW? Izvorni znanstveni rad UDK 338.48:629.78(4EU:73) 347.82(4EU:73) 347.85(4EU:73) 340.5 Primljeno: 14. svibnja 2021. Iva Savić Nika Petić The concept of commercial suborbital flights cannot be established while we still lack two fundamental things: a definition of suborbital flight, and legal regulation of this phenomenon. When attempting to determine whether air or space law should govern commercial suborbital flights, due to the non-existent delimitation between airspace and outer space, we face several questions that need to be resolved. These questions are considered through both spatialist and functionalist approaches, which are further used to discern whether commercial suborbital flights fall under the scope of air or space law. In this context, in this paper we aim to consider the broader picture, analysing existing regulation and the work of regulatory bodies in the EU and US. In conclusion, we suggest a new sui generis approach to commercial suborbital flights in international law, possibly through the ICAO with the support of UNCOPUOS, and the creation of a separate convention to address commercial suborbital flights as a special category. Ključne riječi: commercial suborbital flights, international air law, international space law, space tourism, delimitation of space Iva Savić, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law of the University of Zagreb, Chair of Maritime and Transport law Nika Petić, lawyer trainee at the Law Firm ILEJ & PARTNERS LLC Savić, Petić: Commercial Suborbital
    [Show full text]