arXiv:1410.2497v1 [physics.atom-ph] 9 Oct 2014 ilsitrc nawd ag flnt clsgoverned scales length of range wide a on par- interact constituent ticles the gases, For homonuclear excited properties. quanti- optically microscopic requires their of gases understanding cold tative in phenomenology collective observable. may experimentally which be modes, then subradiant into so- couplings through Fano mixed can called be exci- may whole, state collective timed-Dicke a the superradiance. a Further, one-photon as Such of sample possibility the the 14]. demonstrate through [13, distributed timed-Dicke created tation so-called be a may system, optical state atomic off-resonance an through of for work, that, excitation Recent shown limited. has subradi- more instance, much fragile been relatively has investigators, states the ant many on by research studied states experimental and states superradiant observed subradiant Although been and have [12]. super Dicke rep- the by possible is introduced One these by of described superpositions. resentation atomic system cold of the collective in and be entity, a can generated single ensemble be a excited can considered optically an that ensembles, coherence Because atomic global investigation. current atomic the of random of areas and are light [8–11] of samples, lasing 7] atomic [6, cold localization confined Anderson in medi- disorder phenomena spatial those by Among ated time. of sub- the for periods stantial decoherence comprising environmental atoms survive the ap- can and in between samples, fields, shared true scattered coherence and especially where plied is cor- gases, develops This atomic systems cold [1–5]. such characteristics of den- optics related atomic quantum the the increasing well applied sity, upon to quite However, system optically is the understood. and of radiation dilute response electromagnetic a the monochromatic or of atoms of case nuclear gas the individual thin In of scatterers. those atomic from significantly differ ofnaetlydsrb uhrc oprtv and cooperative rich such describe fundamentally To matter aggregated of properties optical general The 2 nttt o nltclIsrmnain usa Academ Russian Instrumentation, Analytical for Institute cteigb ihdniyadcl nebeof ensemble cold and high-density a by scattering ASnmes 42.50.Ct,42.25.Fx,42.50.Nn,32.70.Jz,32. numbers: PACS measurements. density-dep the the from of extracted values are Absolute section Law. depende Beer-Lambert density sc the traditional light in the cooperative from departure induced significant interaction dipole-dipole of 1 eateto hoeia hsc,SaePltcncUniv Polytechnic State Physics, Theoretical of Department oprtvl nacdlgttasiso ncl tmcm atomic cold in transmission light enhanced Cooperatively erpr nacdtasiso nmaueet ftespec the of measurements in transmission enhanced report We l oiinUiest,Dprmn fPhysics, of Department University, Dominion Old ai ep ..Ro,adMD Havey M.D. and Roof, S.J. Kemp, Kasie ..Sokolov I.M. ofl,Vrii 23529 Virginia Norfolk, 1 , 2 n ..Kupriyanov D.V. and 87 80.Qk pcrldtnn rmrsnneadteaoi density. atomic the the and on resonance intensity from scattered detuning forward spectral the of dependence the yagedpnet( angle-dependent by ierdaiedpl-ioeitrcin Here interaction. dipole-dipole radiative wise ffc a lopeitdmr eetyb [4]. by recently more predicted also was effect atom free a for of cloud in suppres- density cold the increasing and on with dense reported scattering a light has diffuse [20] of letter sion other recent the On a in- [17–19]. have hand, vapors warm shift, in including observed field effects, been deed local Such Lorentz-Lorenz in- shift. customary response, Lamb the collective optical 16] a the [15, cluding of systems modification such predicted of have Compre- treatments [1–3]. theoretical is conditions [3], hensive such quasimodes understanding collective for of should constituent useful basis its and conceptual of system, A response the body parts. representa- from many then modified resonant strongly is near be whole a a of as tive system The vector. wave owr cteigo errsnnerdainfo a from cold radiation of resonance cloud dense near and large of scattering forward rto ewe aro tm and atoms of pair a between aration s-n,i rprinlt h pia et = b depth optical the measured to T, proportional ρ transmission is normalized -lnT, the Law. as Beer-Lambert case, the what this to over In according expected transmission be light substantial would a coherent is sample there of cylindrical that enhancement shown a has on atoms incident stationary properties of light dispersive resonance and near transmission the of Theoretical on 2] interaction. [1, the inhomogeneous work upon the an only of appear of and inclusion descriptions matter phe- and field light emergent of mean interaction are with features col- 22] associated spectral the [21, nomena research such of Theoretical that shift suggests frequency resonance. small atomic a lective indicate also ments Rb steaoi density, atomic the is nti etrw eoteprmna netgto of investigation experimental report we letter this In tm.Ti hnmnn hc saresult a is which phenomenon, This atoms. fSine,180,S.Ptrbr,Russia St.-Petersburg, 198103, Sciences, of y teigi h tmcsml,ipisa implies sample, atomic the in attering c ftetasitdlgta embodied as light transmitted the of nce riy 921 t-eesug Russia St.-Petersburg, 195251, ersity, netfradlgtsatrn cross- scattering light forward endent rldpnec ffradlight forward of dependence tral n stesml egh uhan Such length. sample the is L and , 1 kr ) − σ n n=123 em ntepair- the in terms 1,2,3) = (n , stesatrn rs section cross scattering the is 87 Rb 87 Rb tm.Teemeasure- These atoms. tm.W investigate We atoms. atter k 2 = π/λ r stelight the is stesep- the is ρσL ; 2

F ′ = 2 hyperfine transition. The trap and repumping lasers are frequency tuned and rapidly switched on or off through acousto optical modulators (AOM). Fluores- cence imaging measurements show that the sample has a nearly Gaussian spatial atom distribution of peak den- 2 2 −r /2ro sity ρo, described by ρ(r) = ρoe ; for this sample 87 ro 0.4 mm. The temperature of the Rb atomic gas was≈ determined via ballistic expansion to be 200 µK. A maximum optical depth of b 10 on the trapping∼ tran- sition was determined through∼ absorption imaging mea- surements, resulting in a peak atomic density of ρo 9 x 1010 atoms/cm3. The number of atoms in the MOT∼ is determined from the peak optical depth and the sample dimensions as determined by fluorescence imaging. This critical value is also found to agree within 10% with mea- surements employing a robust optical pumping method [24]. Second, some of the atoms in the MOT are loaded into a far off resonance optical dipole trap (FORT) oper- ating at a power of 2.1 W and a wavelength of 1.064 µm. The laser is focused to a beam spot size 18 µm and has a Rayleigh length of 0.9 mm, resulting∼ in a trap depth of about 700 µK. The FORT is spatially overlapped FIG. 1: (a) Schematic layout of the experimental arrange- with the MOT. To accomplish efficient FORT loading, ment. Here CCD refers to a charge coupled device detector, the cold atomic cloud is dynamically compressed and fur- L a lens, A an aperture, PL the probe laser, and S the atom ther cooled through detuning the MOT lasers by about sample. (b) A partial energy level of the pertinent transitions -60 MHz and simultaneously reducing the repumper laser 87 in Rb. The hyperfine components are indicated in paren- power by 100 times. The MOT and repumper lasers − thesis. ∆ = f fo is the detuning from atomic resonance are then extinguished∼ and the quadrupole magnetic field at frequency fo. (c) A representative spectral scan of trans- is shut off. The entire process of loading the atoms into mission of the probe laser through the atomic sample. The ordinate displays the measured value of -lnT, where T is the the F = 1 hyperfine level takes approximately 70 ms. A waiting period of 200 ms is required for the atoms in spatially integrated transmitted probe intensity, normalized ∼ to the incident value. the FORT to come to thermal equilibrium at 100 µK 13 3 ∼ and a peak density ρ0 2x10 atoms/cm . The atomic sample is well described∼ by a bi-Gaussian spatial distri- At the densities where the measurements are performed, bution of atoms, in the F = 1 ground hyperfine level, the dipole-dipole interaction plays an important role in having Gaussian radii of ro = 3.6 µm and zo = 280 µm. the system physics, and leads to a significant variation In the experiments reported here (see Fig. 1(a)), we in the transparency of the atomic sample with increasing measure the forward scattered intensity of a near reso- density. We emphasize that these studies are importantly nance probe laser beam having a wavelength 780 nm, ∼ 2 different than previous investigations in that the coher- and tuned in a range 30 MHz about the 5s S1/2 2 ′ ± ently forward scattered light is measured, in contrast to F = 2 5p P3/2 F = 3 nearly-closed hyperfine tran- the radiation diffusely scattered in other directions [20]. sition.→ The natural width of this transition is about 6.1 For forward scattering the absolute light scattering cross MHz. The probe beam bisects the biGaussian atom sam- section is also determined. ple, and is focused near the center of the atom cloud. Samples of dense and cold 87Rb gas are prepared in The probe beam profile is well represented as a focused a multistep process. First, atoms from a warm atomic Gaussian beam with an intensity waist of 2.5 µm and a vapor are cooled and loaded into a magneto optical trap Rayleigh range of 99 µm. The laser power of the lin- 2 (MOT) [23], which operates near the 5s S1/2 F = 2 early polarized probe is about 75 pW, giving an on res- 2 ′ → 5p P3/2 F = 3 hyperfine transition. The trapping laser onance saturation parameter of so 0.1, meaning that is derived from an external-cavity diode laser (ECDL) saturation effects should be minimal∼ in the experiments system in a master-slave configuration, and is split into reported here. Note that with the relatively tight fo- three pairs of retro reflected beams, delivering an esti- cus, the probe beam, when tuned to atomic resonance, mated trapping laser intensity of 40 mW/cm2. To is strongly occluded by the atomic sample. Upon exiting prevent off-resonance optical pumping≃ of the atomic va- the sample chamber, the probe beam is passed through por into the lower energy F = 1 hyperfine level, a re- a variable circular aperture and then focused to a light 2 2 pumping laser is set to the 5s S1 2 F = 1 5p P3 2 detector using an achromatic doublet lens arranged in a / → / 3

FIG. 3: Density variations of the forward scattering cross FIG. 2: Density variations of observables for forward scatter- section. (a) Measured and rescaled forward scattering cross ing. (a) Full width at half maximum of the spectral depen- section. (b) Spectral integral. On theoretical grounds, this dence of the optical depth. (b) Peak optical depth, defined as integral is independent of density. -ln(T) where T is the normalized transmission.

ple size. As the decrease is quite slow on the scale of the unit magnification 2f - 2f configuration; here f is the fo- measurement time, the density is nearly static on the cal length of the collection lens. The detector used is a measurement time scale. In an alternate method, the charge coupled device (CCD) camera, which collects the atomic sample is held in the FORT for increasingly long spatially distributed intensity optically transferred from delay times, during which the number of atoms decreases the sample to the detector plane. due to depopulation of the FORT by background gas col- Once the sample is constituted, it is confined in the lisions. Then the FORT laser was turned off, and the FORT until measurements are made. Then the FORT transmitted light intensity measured by the integrated laser is extinguished, a process which takes several µs. signals detected on the CCD camera. Each of these meth- After a variable delay time, during which the sample bal- ods yielded similar results; in the present letter we focus listically expands, the atoms are optically pumped to the on the ballistic expansion method. In addition, we make F = 2 ground hyperfine level, a process which takes ap- measurements for different size light collection apertures proximately 8 µs. Then the sample is exposed to a probe (Fig. 1(a)). This is done to assess the role of mode mis- laser beam for a period of about 10 µs. Ballistic expan- matching of the forward scattered light and the incident sion before probing controllably reduces the density at a probe beam; the data presented here shows only a weak nearly fixed total number of atoms. Exposure of the sam- dependence on this effect. Tests were made to determine ple to the probe beam after some delay then corresponds any level of forward scattered light in the linear polariza- to a measurement at reduced density, and increased sam- tion channel orthogonal to the coherent one; if present, 4 diffusely scattered light should be unpolarized and thus dence, and the overall density dependence itself, suggests contribute to the signal. Within the sensitivity of our expressing the basic measurements of the optical depth measurements, no such signal was seen, insuring that in- in terms of a light scattering cross section σ. This we do coherently forward scattered light is negligible here. in the lower set of data points (circles and inverted tri- The main experimental results consist of measure- angles) in Fig. 3(a). We point out that the cross section ments of the density and spectral dependence of light shown there is an effective one, averaged over the over- forward scattered from a 87Rb atomic ensemble. Here we lap between the inhomogeneous atomic cloud and probe report traditionally defined values of the optical depth beam. In the figure, we see that the cross section re- b = - lnT, where T is the measured light intensity nor- gains monotonic behavior and, for the lowest densities, malized to the incident intensity in the absence of the approaches the expected isolated atomic cross section of −9 2 atomic ensemble. For transmission of light through the 1.36 x 10 cm for this transition. However, we also see center of a Gaussian atomic cloud, the optical depth b = that the resulting cross section decreases by an order ∼ √2πσρoro, where ρo is the atomic density in the center of magnitude as the density is increased to the largest of the cloud, and ro is the Gaussian radius of the cloud. attained value. This sharp decrease is due to several fac- σ is the cross section, assuming that it does not depend tors. The primary experimental cause is the fact that the on atomic density. A characteristic spectrum obtained laser probe profile as it crosses the atomic cloud samples 13 3 at a peak density of 1.5 x 10 atoms/cm is shown in an average density smaller than the maximum ρo at the Fig. 1(c). The data are very well fit by a Lorentzian, cloud center, resulting in increased transmission. Such an from which the frequency offset from bare atomic reso- effect depends on the atomic density and on the atomic nance, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the sample size. Simulations of this averaging show, at the response, and the peak optical depth is determined. First highest density, a factor of about three decrease in the we consider the the measured frequency offset; for this measured transmission. A second but less important ef- quantity, we are able to set only an upper technical limit fect is the absence of ideal mode matching between the of about 1 MHz. Second, we present in Fig. 2(a) incident probe field and the response field generated by our results± for the width of the spectral response. Here the atoms in the cold ensemble. we see a significant increase of the FWHM with increas- It is useful to have a second and independent determi- ing density; at the highest density the FWHM is about nation of this effect. Such a measure is illustrated in Fig. 25 MHz. At the lowest attained densities, the width is 3(b), where a spectral integral is graphed versus atomic slightly larger than 6.1 MHz, the natural width of the density. The normalized spectral integral, as we define transition. This difference is likely due to a combination it, is the cross section integrated over detuning (see Fig. of the probe spectral width, the residual Doppler width of 1(c)) and then divided by the natural width. Crucially, the atomic resonance, and the long term stability of the recent rigorous calculations [1, 2] have shown that this in- central laser frequency. We point out that the increasing tegral, for the case of forward scattered light, is constant width for our spatially larger samples should primarily over a wide range of densities, including that explored be a density, rather than optical depth dependent, effect; here. This constraint allows us to use the results of Fig. we have confirmed this by separate experiments on sam- 3(b) to rescale the density dependent cross section. The ples of increasing density, but fixed sample size, where result of this rescaling is shown in the upper points (di- the FWHM is consistent with the results of Fig. 2(a). amonds and squares) of Fig. 3(a). The clear remaining As for the overall trend of the data, we see an increase decrease is the main result of this paper, which is the sup- in the FWHM, but a tendency towards a slowing down pression, and the absolute magnitude of, the cross section of the increase with density. In comparing these results for forward scattering as a function of atomic density. with earlier measurements [20], we see that the overall The overall size of this effect is in qualitative agreement magnitude of the FWHM is similar, and there is a sim- with recently reported fluorescence measurements [20], ilar tendency towards saturation. Absolute comparison but are put on an absolute scale. cannot be directly made because the measurements of Recent research [1–4, 20] gives a framework for under- [20] (a) are made on a microscopic sample for which a standing the main result of this paper. First all, from a larger number of atoms are in the proximity of the sur- physical point of view it is important to realize that the face, and (b) the spectral response of the diffusive com- average atom-atom separation is small enough that the ponent of scattered light is measured, rather than the shorter range dipole-dipole interactions are also impor- forward scattered light. tant [25], but that the long-range radiative part of the We now turn to the density dependence of the peak op- dipole dipole interaction also drives larger length scale tical depth, as shown in Fig. 2(b). The overall nonmono- cooperative interactions among the system particles [4]. tonic behavior observed is due to several factors that ap- The deviation from linear density dependence of the opti- pear in the expression for the optical depth b. First, the cal depth at higher density is then caused by interactions atomic density is varied by ballistic increase of the value among the system particles via the interatomic resonant of the Gaussian radius, ro. This implicit density depen- dipoledipole interaction. This interaction generally leads 5 to coupling among the atoms in the ensemble, and par- M.D. Havey, Light scattering from a dense and ultra cold ticularly generates shifts of collective resonances, so that atomic gas, Phys. Rev. A 79, 053405 (2009). the peak cross section for resonance radiation decreases. [6] P.W. Anderson, Absence of Diffusion in Certain Random Then the overall increase in the peak optical depth due to Lattices, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958). [7] S. E. Skipetrov and I. M. Sokolov, Absence of Ander- the linear density dependence in the Beer Lambert Law son Localization of Light in a Random Ensemble of Point is partially suppressed by the resonance shifts and broad- Scatterers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 023905 (2014). ening. Overall, a quasimodal analysis of the width and [8] Q. Baudouin, N. Mercadier, V. Guarrera, W. Guerin, location of the poles of the resolvent [1–3] is also useful. R. Kaiser, A cold-atom random laser, Nat. Phys. 9, 357 These modes may be considered as sub- or super-radiant (2013). depending on whether the associated width is smaller or [9] Hui Cao, Lasing in Disordered Media, in Prog. Optics 45 greater than the 6.1 MHz natural decay width of the free (2003). [10] V.S. Letokhov, Generation of light by a scattering atom. In our experiment, the spectral profile of the probe medium with negative resonance absorption, Sov. Phys. matches better with larger width modes, leading to pref- JETP 16, 835-840 (1968). erential excitation of superradiant-type modes, and an [11] L. V. Gerasimov, V. M. Ezhova, D. V. Kupriyanov, Q. associated spectral response of increased width, as ob- Baudouin, W. Guerin, and R. Kaiser, Raman process un- served in experiment [3, 20]. der condition of radiation trapping in a disordered atomic medium, Phys. Rev. A 90, 013814 (2014). In conclusion, we have detailed experimental investi- [12] R. H. Dicke, Coherence in Spontaneous Radiation Pro- gation of collective density effects on coherent forward cesses, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954). scattering of light in cold atomic gases. The measure- [13] Marlan O. Scully, Collective Lamb Shift in Single Pho- ments show that there is a substantial suppression of the ton Dicke Superradiance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 143601 peak light scattering cross section with increasing den- (2009). sity, leading to an increased transparency of the atomic [14] Ralf Rohlsberger, Kai Schlage, Balaram Sahoo, Sebastien cloud. Interpretation of the measurements in terms of Couet, and Rudolf Ruffer, Collective Lamb Shift in Single-Photon Superradiance, Science 328, 1248 (2010). the constancy of a spectral integral with density permits [15] R. Friedberg, S.R. Hartmann, and J.T. Manassah, Fre- the cross section measurements to be put on an absolute quency shifts in emission and absorption by resonant sys- scale. The results may be understood by considering the tems of two-level atoms, Phys. Rep. 7, 010 (1973). optical excitation to be described in terms of quasimodes [16] J.T. Manassah, Cooperative radiation from atoms in dif- of the system, whose cooperative behavior lead to both ferent geometries; decay rate and frequency shift, Adv. broadening and suppression of the peak cross section. Optics and Phot. 4, 108 (2012). [17] J.J. Maki, M.S. Malcuit, J.E. Sipe, and R.W. Boyd, We appreciate financial support by the National Sci- Linear and Nonlinear Optical Measurements of the Lo- ence Foundation (Grant Nos. NSF-PHY-0654226 and cal Lorentz Field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 972 (1991). NSF-PHY-1068159), the Russian Foundation for Ba- [18] J. Keaveney, A. Sargsyan, U. Krohn, I.G. Hughes, D. sic Research (Grant No. RFBR-CNRS 12-02-91056). Sarkisyan, and C.S. Adams, Cooperative Lamb Shift in D.V.K. would like to acknowledge support from the Ex- an Atomic Vapor Layer of Nanometer Thickness, Phys. ternal Fellowship Program of the Russian Quantum Cen- Rev. Lett. 108, 173601 (2012). ter (Ref. Number 86). We also acknowledge the generous [19] H. vanKampen, V.A. Sautenkov, C.J.C. Smeets, E.R. Eliel, and J.P. Woerdman, Measurement of the excita- support of the Ministry of Education and Science of the tion dependence of the Lorentz local-field, Phys. Rev. A Russian Federation (State Assignment 3.1446.2014K). 59, 271 (1999). [20] J. Pellegrino, R. Bourgain, S. Jennewein, Y.R.P. Sortais, A. Browaeys, S.D. Jenkins and J. Ruostekoski, Observa- tion of suppression of light scattering induced by dipole dipole interactions in a cold-atom ensemble, Phys. Rev. [1] Ya. A. Fofanov, A.S. Kuraptsev, I.M. Sokolov, and M.D. Lett. 113, 133602 (2014). Havey, Dispersion of the dielectric permittivity of dense [21] Juha Javanainen, Janne Ruostekoski, Yi Li, and Sung- and ultracold atomic gases, Phys. Rev. A 84, 53811 Mi Yoo, Shifts of a Resonance Line in a Dense Atomic (2011). Sample, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 113603 (2014). [2] I.M. Sokolov, D.V. Kupriyanov, and M.D. Havey, Micro- [22] Juha Javanainen and Janne Ruostekoski, Strong correla- scopic theory of scattering of weak electromagnetic radi- tions in light propagation beyond the mean-field theory of ation by a dense ensemble of ultracold atoms JETP 112, optics, arXiv:1409.4598 (2014). 246 (2011). [23] H. J. Metcalf, P. van der Straten, Laser Cooling and [3] S. Balik, A.L. Win, M.D. Havey, I.M. Sokolov and D.V. Trapping, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999). Kupriyanov, Near-resonance light scattering from a high- [24] Ying-Cheng Chen, Yean-An Liao, Long Hsu, and Ite A. density ultracold atomic Rb gas, Phys. Rev. A 87, 053817 Yu, Simple technique for directly and accurately measur- (2013). ing the number of atoms in a magneto optical trap, Phys. [4] See, for example, T. Bienaime, R. Bachelard, N. Piovella Rev A 64, 031401(R) (2001). and R. Kaiser, Cooperativity in light scattering by cold [25] Nadia Bouloufa, Anne Crubellier and Olivier Dulie, Pho- atoms, Fortschr. Phys. 61, 377 (2013). toassociative molecular spectroscopy for atomic radiative [5] I.M. Sokolov, M.D. Kupriyanova, D.V. Kupriyanov, and lifetimes, Phys. Scr. T134, 014014 (2009).