DOCSLIB.ORG

Sequatchie County Geological Formation Sequatchie County Is on the Southeastern Margin of Middle Tennessee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sequatchie County Geological Formation Sequatchie County Is on the Southeastern Margin of Middle Tennessee Sequatchie County Geological Formation Sequatchie County is on the southeastern margin of Middle Tennessee. The county is 19 14 19 almost entirely part of the Cumberland Plateau. 07 The only exception is its northwestern tip, µ part of the Eastern Highland Rim. The Cumberland Plateau in this county is divided into three distinct topographic divisions. These include 03 the plateau’s tableland, Sequatchie Valley, and Walden Ridge, the regional name given to the plateau tableland east of the valley. 11 11 11 Pennsylvanian-age sandstones, shales, and conglomerates cap the plateau tableland 33 and Walden Ridge. In Sequatchie Valley, 11 Ordovician-age limestones underlie the floor while Mississippian-age limestones 11 and lesser amounts of dolomites, sandstones, shales, and chert line the walls of the valley. 11 11 Mississippian-age sandstones, shales, and limestones are also found on the Highland Rim. 11 11 Nearly level rock beds are found in all parts 38 of the county. 37 07 19 "Tennessee Topology" by David D. Starnes 11 40 TN Div of Geology, Bulletin 86 14 07 07 33 11 3738 26 231520 07 17 39 19 14 11 27 11 07 07 Cumberland Trail n 23 Brassfield Formation d a n i o d r a i Sequatchie County Geology i o 03 r 24 Clinch Sandstone r u i l r u e i l i e Formation Breakdown S P S P 25 Rockwood Formation 01 Alluvial Deposits 26 Bigby-Cannon Limestone 02 Crab Orchard Mountains & Gizzard Groups 27 Carters Limestone 03 Crab Orchard Mountains Group d 28 Chepultepec Dolomite o i 14 19 r 04 Crooked Fork Group e d 29 Chickamauga Group P o i Walden Ridge Face r 05 Cross Mountain Formation n e 30 Copper Ridge Dolomite a 38 P i d n n 06 Fentress Formation a o 31 Juniata Formation a i 37 i r n v l d a 07 Gizzard Group e o 20 y v i l 32 Knox Group P s r y e s n n 08 Graves Gap Formation P n n a 33 Lebanon Limestone n i n e e c a i P i P 09 Indian Bluff Formation c v i 34 Longview Dolomite v o o 10 Redoak Mountain Formation d d r r 35 Middle and Lower Parts of Chickamauga Group O 19 O 26 11 Rockcastle Conglomerate 40 15 14 36 Newala Formation, Mascot Dolomite 12 Slatestone Formation 38 39 23 17 37 Pierce and Murfreesboro Limestones 27 13 Vowell Mountain Formation 33 38 Ridley Limestone 37 14 Bangor Limestone 39 Sequatchie Formation 07 15 Fort Payne Formation d 40 Wells Creek Formation o i 16 Grainger Formation r 41 Conasauga Group d d e o o P i i r 17 Monteagle Limestone r d e 42 Maryville Limestone n e P o a 07 i i P r n 18 Newman Limestone p e 03 a 43 Maynardville Limestone i n P p p i 07 a n i s p 19 Pennington Formation i a r s 44 Nolichucky Shale i s i r b s i s b s s 20 St. Louis Limestone m s i m 45 Pumpkin Valley Shale i a a M M 21 Chattanooga Shale C C 46 Rome Foundation 22 Sneedville Limestone Map produced by Jim Brannon - Cumberland Trail SST - 11/12/2009.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 8-2018 Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval, Kinderhookian-Osagean Series, Lower Mississippian System, Tri-State Region, Southern Midcontinent Forrest Dalton McFarlin University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Recommended Citation McFarlin, Forrest Dalton, "Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval, Kinderhookian-Osagean Series, Lower Mississippian System, Tri-State Region, Southern Midcontinent" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 2952. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2952 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval, Kinderhookian-Osagean Series, Lower Mississippian System, Tri-State Region, Southern Midcontinent A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology by Forrest Dalton McFarlin Texas Christian University Bachelor of Science in Geology, 2015 August 2018 University of Arkansas This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. _____________________________________ Walter Manger, PhD Thesis Director _____________________________________ Adriana Potra, PhD Committee Member _____________________________________ Thomas McGilvery, PhD Committee Member ©2018 by Forrest Dalton McFarlin All Rights Reserved Abstract The Lower Mississippian interval comprises a single, third-order, eustatic cycle subdivided lithostratigraphically into the St. Joe Limestone (Hopkins 1893) and overlying Boone Formation (Branner 1891, Simonds 1891) with type areas in northern Arkansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology of Altenburg Quadrangle, Jackson County
    BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF ALTENBURG QUADRANGLE Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability William W. Shilts, Executive Director JACKSON COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND PERRY COUNTY, MISSOURI STATEMAP Altenburg-BG ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY E. Donald McKay III, Interim Director Mary J. Seid, Joseph A. Devera, Allen L. Weedman, and Dewey H. Amos 2009 360 GEOLOGIC UNITS ) ) ) 14 Qal Alluvial deposits ) 13 18 Quaternary Pleistocene and Holocene 17 360 ) 15 360 16 14 0 36 ) 13 Qf Fan deposits ) Unconformity Qal ) & 350 tl Lower Tradewater Formation Atokan ) ) Pennsylvanian 360 ) &cv Caseyville Formation Morrowan 24 360 ) Unconformity ) 17 Upper Elviran undivided, Meu ) Waltersburg to top of Degonia 19 20 Qal 21 22 23 ) 24 ) Mv Vienna Limestone 360 o ) 3 Mts ) 350 Mts Tar Springs Sandstone ) 20 360 ) Mgd 360 30 ) Mgd Glen Dean Limestone ) 21 350 360 Mts 29 ) Qal Hardinsburg Sandstone and J N Mhg Chesterian ) Golconda Formations h Æ Qal Mav anc 28 27 Br ) N oJ 26 25 JN 85 N ) Cypress Sandstone through J Mcpc Dsl 500 Paint Creek Formation JN N ) J o Mts N 5 J s ) Dgt 600 J N 70 J N Mgd Yankeetown Formation s ) Myr Db 80 28 Æ and Renault Sandstone N J 29 N J N ) Sb J Mgd Mississippian o Dgt Ssc 25 Clines o N 25 Msg 27 ) Qal J 80 s 3 Mav Aux Vases Sandstone N J N Mts o MILL J MISSISSIPPI 34 ) Qal J N ) N J Dsl 35 N 26 J o N 25 J Mgd Mgd ) Msg Ste. Genevieve Limestone 500 o Db DITCH J 20 Mgd N N N ) J J o RIVER o N 600 J 80 N ) 10 o J Mav Æ Msl St.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Resources Inventory Ancillary Map Information Document for Little River Canyon National Preserve
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Directorate Geologic Resources Division Little River Canyon National Preserve GRI Ancillary Map Information Document Produced to accompany the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) Digital Geologic Data for Little River Canyon National Preserve liri_geology.pdf Version: 6/30/2020 I Little River Canyon National Preserve Geologic Resources Inventory Ancillary Map Information Document for Little River Canyon National Preserve Table of Contents Geologic Reso..u..r..c..e..s.. .I.n..v..e..n..t.o...r.y.. .M...a..p.. .D...o..c..u..m...e...n..t............................................................................ 1 About the NPS.. .G...e..o..l.o..g..i.c... .R..e..s..o..u...r.c..e..s.. .I.n..v..e..n...t.o..r.y.. .P...r.o..g...r.a..m............................................................... 3 GRI Digital Ma.p..s.. .a..n...d.. .S..o..u...r.c..e.. .M...a..p.. .C...i.t.a..t..i.o..n..s.................................................................................. 5 Index Ma..p........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Map Unit List ................................................................................................................................... 7 Map Unit Desc..r.i.p..t.i.o...n..s...................................................................................................................... 9 Qal - Allu..v..iu..m... .a..n..d.. .l.o..w... .t.e..r.r.a..c..e.. .d..e..p..o..s..i.t.s. .(..Q..u..a..t.e..r..n..a..r.y.)..................................................................................................... 9 Tal - Fluv..i.a..l. .d..e..p..o..s.i.t.s.. .(.T..e..r..t.ia..r..y.)........................................................................................................................................ 9 PNpv - P.o..t.t.s..v..i.l.le.. .F...o..r.m...a..t.i.o..n.
    [Show full text]
  • IC-29 Geology and Ground Water Resources of Walker County, Georgia
    IC 29 GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 29 GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF WALKER COUNTY, GEORGIA By Charles W. Cressler U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey ATLANTA 1964 CONTENTS Page Abstract _______________________________________________ -··---------------------------- _____________________ ----------------·----- _____________ __________________________ __ 3 In trodu ction ------------------------------------------ ________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Purpose and scope ------------------------------"--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Previous inv es tigati o ns ____ _____ ________ _______ __________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 Geo Io gy _________________________________________________________________ --- ___________________ -- ___________ ------------- __________________ ---- _________________ ---- _______ 5 Ph ys i ogr a p hy ______________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- __________________ -------------------------------- 5 Geo Io gi c his tory __________________________ _ __ ___ ___ _______ _____________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------- 5 Stratigraphy -·· __________________
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee
    Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 996 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Division of Geology Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee By ROBERT C. MILICI and HELMUTH WEDOW, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 996 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Division of Geology UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1977 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Milici, Robert C 1931- Upper Ordovician and Silurian stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and parts of the adjacent valley and ridge, Tennessee. (Geological Survey professional paper; 996) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16:996 1. Geology, Stratigraphic--Ordovician. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic--Silurian. 3. Geology--Tennessee--Sequatchie Valley. 4. Geology--Tennessee--Chattanooga region. I. Wedow, Helmuth, 1917- joint author. II: Title. Upper Ordovician and Silurian stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley .... III. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper; 996. QE660.M54 551.7'310976877 76-608170 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03002·1 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Sequence Stratigraphic Framework for the Late Devonian Chattanooga Shale of the Southeastern Us: Relevance for the Bakken Shale
    DEVELOPING A SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK FOR THE LATE DEVONIAN CHATTANOOGA SHALE OF THE SOUTHEASTERN US: RELEVANCE FOR THE BAKKEN SHALE Jürgen Schieber Department of Geology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019 ABSTRACT The Late Devonian Chattanooga Shale of Tennessee and Kentucky is in most areas a thin black shale deposit of less than 10 meters thickness. It is a distal equivalent to the almost 3000m thick Catskill sequence, and encompasses most of the Frasnian and Fammenian. Although originally thought of as a continuously, though slowly, deposited deep water shale unit, the Chattanooga Shale shows internal erosion surfaces at various scales as well as storm deposits. These features suggest comparatively shallow water deposition (tens of meters water depth), and a stratigraphic record with numerous interruptions of various duration. A number of erosion surfaces are laterally extensive and can be traced from exposure to exposure through the entire outcrop area (over distances of as much as 300km). Erosion surfaces of this type are considered sequence boundaries sensu Vail, and tracing them has made it possible to subdivide the Chattanooga Shale into as many as 14 sequences. These sequence boundaries are very subtle. The following features are indicative of their presence in a given outcrop: 1) sandy, silty, or pyritic lag deposits of up to several cm thickness; 2) sharp-based shale beds; 3) low-angle truncation of shale beds; 4) scoured surfaces; and 5) soft-sediment deformation in underlying shales. Tracing erosion surfaces from outcrop to outcrop is based on a combination of: 1) petrographic matching of lag deposits; 2) the petrography and microfabrics of individual shale packages; 3) conodont data; and 4) gamma ray surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Uranium Content of the Chattanooga Shale in Northeastern Alabama Northwestern Georgia and Eastern Tennessee
    Stratigraphy and Uranium Content of the Chattanooga Shale in Northeastern Alabama Northwestern Georgia and Eastern Tennessee y LYNN GLOVER CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY OF URANIUM GEOLOGICAL SURVEY - B U L L E T I N 10 8 7 - E ''his report concerns work done on behalf f the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission nd is published with the permission of he Commission NITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. - Price $1 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract-..---.---.------.----- --- -------- ._...__._.._. 133 Introduction _____--___--___-_--_----_-------------------__-__--_-- 133 Acknowledgments _-__._____-___._-_-__----_-----_-_-___-_-___-___. 134 General geologic and structural setting-_-_-__--__-_-_______-_________ 135 Stratigraphy and sedimentation-___--___---_----_--__-_--_______-___ 135 Chattanooga shale.--_------_-_--_-_-------_--------______-_.__ 135 Dowelltown and Gassaway members,--_--_-__________._._.._ 136 Overlap.--__---------------_--------------------------_.. 137 Basal sandstone______-________------------_-______________' 137 Lithology ----------------------- ----- ___.___. 139 Sand and silt-----------_---------_-------------_----. 139 Gray beds.--.-----.---..----------------____I... 139 Phosphate and chert._______-__----_--_______--________ 140 Intraformational conglomerates--_-_-._________.____1__. 142 Maury formation._____________________________________________ 143 Birmingham high._________________________________________ 143 Black shale.--_------..----.._---- .-____________ 144 Bacon Bend section..._________________________________L___ 145 Fort Payne.chert.______-____--_-___-__---__---__--__-_-_-__-__ 146 Pre-Chattanooga unconformity and its relation to the origin of the shale.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Ewing Quadrangle Kentucky and Virginia
    Geology of the Ewing Quadrangle Kentucky and Virginia By K. J. ENGLUND, H. L. SMITH, L. D. HARRIS, and J. G. STEPHENS CONTRIBUTIONS TO ECONOMIC GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1142-B A description of formations in the central part of the Cumberland overthrust block UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Pa&'f Abstract---------------------------------------------------------- Bl Introduction _____________________________________________________ _ 1 StratigraphY------------------------------------------------------ 2 Cambrian system _________________ ---~------------------------- 3 Maynardville limestone _____ -- __ --------------------------- 3: Cambrian and Ordovician systems __ ""'---------------------·~..:.----- ·_ .3- ]{noxgrouP----------------------------------------------- 3 Copper Ridge dolomite ______ ---_----------------------- 4 4 Chepultepec dolomite-------------------------------= A a Longview dolomite ___________________________________ _ 4 Newala dolomite _______________________ ------ ___ -----_ 5 Ordovician system __________________ -- ______ -- ____ ------------- 5 Dot for-mation _______________________ -------------- ___ ;.. __ '"'- --1 5 Poteet limestone __________________________ ------___________ - 6 Rob Camp limestone __________________ --------------------- 6 Martin Creek limestone
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Martinsburg Ordovician Stratigraphy of Virginia and West Virginia
    VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 57 POST-MARTINSBURG ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY OF VIRGINIA AND WEST VIRGINIA Richard J. Diecchio COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINERALS AND ENERGY DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES R<>bert C. Milici, Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VIRG IN IA 1 985 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 57 POST-MARTINSBURG ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY OF VIRGINIA AND WEST VIRGINIA Richard J. Diecchio COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINERALS AND ENERGY DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Robert C. Milici, Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGI N IA 1 985 FRONT COVER: Two cycles within the Juniata Formation, Cumberland, Maryland. Jacob's staff is 5 feet long, graduated in feet. Bottom of staff marks base of lowermost sandstone bed (base of cycle). Basal sandstone is here channeled into the underlying mudstone. Top of Jacob's staff marks the middle Sholithos- bearing portion of cycle. Mudstone overlies the Skoli,thos facies and continues up to base of overlying sandstone bed, marking the base of the next cycle. VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 57 POST-MARTINSBURG ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY OF VIRGINIA AND WEST VIRGINIA Richard J. Diecchio COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINERALS AND ENERGY DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Robert C. Milici, Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGI N IA 1985 DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINERALS AND ENERGY Richmond, Virginia O. GENE DISHNER, Director COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF PURCHASE AND SUPPLY RICHMOND 1985 Publication available from Virginia Division of Mineral Resources, Box 366?, Charlottesville, VA 22g0g.
    [Show full text]
  • Clay Mineralogy and Sedimentary Petrography
    CLAY MINERALOGY AND SEDIMENTARY PETROGRAPHY OF LOWER TO MIDDLE PALEOZOIC ROCKS FROM A SINGLE CORE FORM NORTHWEST GEORGIA A THESIS Presented to The Faculty of the Division of Graduate Studies by Ali Ihsan Gevrek In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the School of Geophysical Science Georgia Institute of Technology August, 1978 MINERALOGY AND SEDIMENTARY PETROGRAPHY LOWER TO MIDDLE PALEOZOIC ROCKS FROM A SINGLE CORE FROM NORTHWEST GEORGIA Approved: CharlefE. Weaver, Chairman Kevin C. Beck Charles 0. Poiiara, Jr. Date approved by Chairman: ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to sincerely thank Dr. Charles E. Weaver, my major director, for his guidance, advice, and for pro­ viding me with the thesis subject. I greatly appreciate Drs. Charles 0. Pollard, Jr., and Kevin C. Beck for being on the reading committee and for their fruitful criticisms. Thanks are also extended to Drs. John E. Husted and Howard R. Cramer for their suggestions on the Lower Paleozoic Appalachian problems. The Georgia Geological Survey is to be thanked for providing me the core. A number of people helped me in this work. Dianne Clark encouraged me and Annette Plunkett typed this thesis; special thanks go to them. Brad Broekstra, Robert J. Bullwinkel, and Rick Griffin helped by carrying the core boxes and correcting English grammar; special thanks to them. Finally, thanks to my father, Ismail Gevrek, and my mother, Meryem Gevrek, for their moral support. This research was supported by Government of the Turkish Republic. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . ii LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF PLATES vi LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS vii SUMMARY viii Chapter I.
    [Show full text]
  • Plate 1A Geology Explanation
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA PLATE 1A LEGEND FOR THE HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS SECTIONS LINES AND WELL LOCATIONS, ALABAMA Qalt, Alluvial, coastal, and low terrace Olp, Leipers Limestone kwx, Waxahatchee Slate Qt, High terrace deposits Oscmg, Sequatchie Formation, Colvin Mt. Sandstone, Greensport Formation undifferentiated hf, Higgins Ferry Group Trs, Residuum Oi, Inman Formation hfgr, Higgins Ferry Group graphitic unit QTci, Citronelle Formation Onv, Nashville Group hfgt, Higgins Ferry Group garnet quartzite unit Tm, Miocene Series undifferentiated Ou, Ordovician System undifferentiated pbm, Poe Bridge Mountain Group To, Oligocene Series undifferentiated Oc, Chickamauga Limestone pbmgr, Poe Bridge Mountain Group graphitic unit Tj, Jackson Group undifferentiated Ocm, Colvin Mountain Sandstone pbmgt, Poe Bridge Mountain Group garnet quartzite unit Tgl, Gosport Sand and Lisbon Formation undifferentiated in part Og, Greensport Formation hcp, Pinchoulee Gneiss Tl, Lisbon Formation Onvsr, Nashville and Stones River Groups undifferentiated hch, Hanover Schist Tt, Tallahatta Formation Oca, Attalla Chert Conglomerate Member of the Chickamauga Limestone mi, Mad Indian Group Th, Hatchetigbee Formation Oa, Athens Shale migr, Mad Indian Group graphitic unit Ttu, Tuscahoma Sand Osr, Stones River Group we, Wedowee Group undifferentiated Tnf, Nanafalia Formation Oal, Athens Shale and Lenoir Limestone undifferentiated weh, Hackneyville Schist Tsm, Salt Mountain Limestone Olol, Little Oak and Lenoir Limestones undifferentiated wec, Cornhouse Schist Tn, Naheola
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form PLACES
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 "~7L/ O' (Oct. 1990) I * i. fcCEIYED 2280 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service MAY 2 8 I996 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form PLACES This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places registration Form (National Register Bulletin 1 6A). Complete each item by marking V in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1 . Name of Property_________________________________________________ historic name Wilson. Greenberry, Home Place ________________________________ other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number E. G. Wilson Road ___ NA not for publication city or town Burke_________ _____ x vicinity state Tennessee code TN county Cumberland code 035 zip code 38557 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering property s in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set for in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets D does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]