Theme Overview - 3.5.1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Theme Overview - 3.5.1 POLICY 3.5 PROTECTION OF ASSETS MONITORING REPORT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: County Manager RE: Internal Monitoring Report – Management Limitations POLICY: 3.5 Protection of Assets DATE: May 26, 2015 I hereby present my monitoring report on Management Limitation 3.5 – Protection of Assets. This report is presented in accordance with the monitoring schedule set forth in the Board’s Policy Manual revised March 12, 2013. I certify that the information contained in this report is true and correct. Signed: _________________________, County Manager Date: ______May 20, 2015 _________ Table of Contents 3.5 Protection of Assets Compliance Matrix .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Overview - 3.5 Protection of Assets ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 Theme Overview - 3.5.1 .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 3.5.2 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.5.3 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 3.5.4 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.5.5 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 3.5.6 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 3.5.7 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 3.5.8 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 3.5.9 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 3.5.10 .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Attachment #1 - Eide Bailly Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 112 letter, April 9, 2015 ......................................................... 23 Attachment #2 – Five-Year Capital Improvement Planning Documents .................................................................................................. 27 3.5 Protection of Assets Compliance Matrix County Manager Monitoring Report 3.5 – Protection of Assets Partial- Non- Management Limitation Compliance Compliance Compliance 3.5 Within the scope of his/her authority in the County X and given available resources, the County Manager shall not allow the County’s assets to be unprotected, inadequately maintained or unnecessarily risked. Accordingly, the County Manager shall not: 3.5.1 Fail to have in place a Risk Management program X that insures against property losses and against liability losses to Commissioners, staff and Douglas County to the amount legally obligated to pay, or allow the organization to be uninsured: 3.5.1.1 Against theft and casualty losses X 3.5.1.2 Against liability losses to Board members, staff X and the organization itself in an amount equal to or greater than the average for comparable organizations 3.5.1.3 Against employee theft and dishonesty. X 3 County Manager Monitoring Report 3.5 – Protection of Assets Partial- Non- Management Limitation Compliance Compliance Compliance 3.5.2 Allow un-bonded personnel access to material X amounts of funds, or fail to provide adequate insurance to protect against employee dishonesty and theft. 3.5.3 Subject facilities and/or equipment to improper X wear and tear or insufficient maintenance (except normal deterioration and financial conditions beyond County Manager control). 3.5.4 Unnecessarily expose County government, the X BOCC or staff to claims of liability. 3.5.5 Fail to protect intellectual property (including X intellectual property developed using County resources), information, and files from loss or significant damage. 3.5.6 Acquire, encumber, dispose or contract for real X property except as expressly permitted in the county’s procedure for disposal of county-owned land. 4 County Manager Monitoring Report 3.5 – Protection of Assets Partial- Non- Management Limitation Compliance Compliance Compliance 3.5.7 Allow internal control standards for the receipt, X processing and disbursement of funds to be less than that necessary to satisfy generally accepted accounting/auditing standards recognizing that the cost of internal control should not exceed the benefits expected to be derived. 3.5.8 Endanger the County’s public image, its X credibility, or its ability to accomplish the Board’s Goals. 3.5.9 Fail to adequately plan for short and long-term X capital or facility needs. 3.5.10 Compromise the independence of the Board’s X auditor or other external monitors or advisors. Engaging parties already chosen by the BOCC as consultants or advisers is not permitted. 5 Overview - 3.5 Protection of Assets Description: Within the scope of his/her authority in the County and given available resources, the County Manager shall not allow the County’s assets to be unprotected, inadequately maintained or unnecessarily risked. County Manager’s Interpretation: • Assets are interpreted to represent physical and intellectual property of the County with a value greater than $25,000. • Unprotected is interpreted to mean assets without insurance or without basic security measures in place. • Inadequately maintained is interpreted as a lack of preventive maintenance, repair, or renovation which may cause an asset to deteriorate and experience an accelerated depreciation. • Unnecessarily risked is interpreted as exposure of assets to circumstances resulting in a higher likelihood of theft or otherwise being unavailable for the asset’s intended purpose. This Period's Performance - 2014 Score: 8.3 Historical Performance Series Color Scorecard Object 2012 2013 2014 ML 3.5 Protection of Assets 8.3 8.1 8.3 6 Data Used in Calculations Name Actual Value Score ML 3.5.1 Compliance 3 10 ML 3.5.2 Compliance 3 8.33 ML 3.5.3 Compliance 3 8.33 ML 3.5.4 Compliance 3 8.33 ML 3.5.5 Compliance 3 8.33 ML 3.5.6 Compliance 3 8.33 ML 3.5.7 Compliance 3 8.33 ML 3.5.8 Compliance 3 8.33 ML 3.5.9 Compliance 3 8.33 ML 3.5.10 Compliance 3 8.33 I report compliance based on the information that follows in this report. 7 Accordingly, the County Manager shall not: 3.5.1 Fail to have in place a Risk Management program that insures against property losses and against liability losses to Commissioners, staff and Douglas County to the amount legally obligated to pay, or allow the organization to be uninsured: 3.5.1.1 Against theft and casualty losses, 3.5.1.2 Against liability losses to Board members, staff and the organization itself in an amount equal to or greater than the average for comparable organizations, and 3.5.1.3 Against employee theft and dishonesty. County Manager’s Interpretation: I interpret this to mean that I will ensure that the county has a trained, experienced Risk Manager on staff or on contract. The Risk Manager will ensure that there is a process for making and implementing decisions that will minimize the adverse effects of accidental loss upon the county. The county will maintain an appropriate amount of liability and casualty insurance and bonds to insure against theft. I interpret comparable organizations to mean county or city governments of similar size in terms of employee population, overall budget and those providing similar services. 8 Theme Overview - 3.5.1 Description: Fail to have in place a Risk Management program that insures against property losses and against liability losses to Commissioners, staff and Douglas County to the amount legally obligated to pay, or allow the organization to be uninsured: This Period's Performance - 2014 Score: 10 Historical Performance Series Color Scorecard Object 2011 2012 2013 2014 ML 3.5.1 Compliance 10 10 10 10 Data Used in Calculations Name Actual Value Score ML 3.5.1.1 Compliance Yes 10 ML 3.5.1.2 Compliance Yes 10 ML 3.5.1.3 Compliance Yes 10 9 I report compliance with 3.5.1 based on the following: • The county has a risk manager on staff and insurance contracts are in place to protect the county against property and liability losses. • County insurance contracts carried for 2015-2016 include: o Excess Public Entity Liability o Excess Public Officials Liability o Property/Boiler and Machinery o Auto Physical Damage o Island Marine & Equipment o Excess Workers’
Recommended publications
  • Tol, Xeer, and Somalinimo: Recognizing Somali And
    Tol , Xeer , and Somalinimo : Recognizing Somali and Mushunguli Refugees as Agents in the Integration Process A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Vinodh Kutty IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY David M. Lipset July 2010 © Vinodh Kutty 2010 Acknowledgements A doctoral dissertation is never completed without the help of many individuals. And to all of them, I owe a deep debt of gratitude. Funding for this project was provided by two block grants from the Department of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota and by two Children and Families Fellowship grants from the Annie E. Casey Foundation. These grants allowed me to travel to the United Kingdom and Kenya to conduct research and observe the trajectory of the refugee resettlement process from refugee camp to processing for immigration and then to resettlement to host country. The members of my dissertation committee, David Lipset, my advisor, Timothy Dunnigan, Frank Miller, and Bruce Downing all provided invaluable support and assistance. Indeed, I sometimes felt that my advisor, David Lipset, would not have been able to write this dissertation without my assistance! Timothy Dunnigan challenged me to honor the Somali community I worked with and for that I am grateful because that made the dissertation so much better. Frank Miller asked very thoughtful questions and always encouraged me and Bruce Downing provided me with detailed feedback to ensure that my writing was clear, succinct and organized. I also have others to thank. To my colleagues at the Office of Multicultural Services at Hennepin County, I want to say “Thank You Very Much!” They all provided me with the inspiration to look at the refugee resettlement process more critically and dared me to suggest ways to improve it.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Minnewashta Regional Park Master Plan
    Lake Minnewashta Regional Park Master Plan Prepared For: Carver County Parks October 2002 Prepared By: Brauer & Associates, Ltd. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments Overview In November of 2001, Carver County Board of Commissioners retained Brauer & Associates, Ltd. to work with county staff and local citizens to complete a comprehensive master plan for Lake Minnewashta Regional Park. This document represents the results of the planning process, which was completed in the fall of 2002. The consultant team would like to thank Carver County for undertaking an open and constructive public Acknowledgments participation process for the project. This approach allowed for various perspectives to be considered on important planning issues that affected the master plan for the park. Through this process, it is believed that a responsible balance between human use of the park and its ecological protection was achieved. The consultant team would also like to thank the Carver County Parks Commission and Carver County Board for participating in this project. Their individual and collective insights were instrumental in drawing conclusions that are reasonable and responsible. The consultant team also extends a heartfelt thank you to the Carver County staff, especially Marty Walsh, County Parks Director and Roger Gustafson, County Engineer. The openness with which they approached this project paved the way for an open public process that considered all opinions to be of equal merit and worthy of due consideration. Their understanding of the larger regional context and pressing park needs and how Lake Minnewashta Park fits into the larger regional park picture was also of high value as final conclusions were drawn.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and Security in Central and Southern Somalia
    Danish 2/2004 Immigration Service ENG Human rights and security in central and southern Somalia Joint Danish, Finnish, Norwegian and British fact-finding mission to Nairobi, Kenya 7- 21 January 2004 Copenhagen, March 2004 The Danish Immigration Service Ryesgade 53 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Phone: + 45 35 36 66 00 Website: www.udlst.dk E-mail: [email protected] List of reports on fact finding missions in 2003 and 2004 Sikkerheds- og beskyttelsesforhold for minoritetsbefolkninger, kvinder og børn i Somalia Marts 2003: 1 Menneskerettighedsforhold i Burundi Maj 2003: 2 Dobbeltstraf mv. i Serbien Maj 2003:3 Joint British-Danish Fact Finding Mission to Damascus, Amman and Geneva on Conditions in Iraq August 2003: 4 Indrejse- og opholdsbetingelser for statsløse palæstinensere i Libanon November 2003: 5 Sikkerheds- og menneskeretsforhold for rohingyaer i Burma og Bangladesh December 2003: 6 Fact-finding mission til Amman vedrørende asylrelevante forhold i Irak Januar 2004: 1 Human rights and security in central and southern Somalia Marts 2004 : 2 Human rights and security in central and southern Somalia Introduction........................................................................................................................5 1 Political developments ...................................................................................................7 1.1 Peace negotiations in Kenya ......................................................................................................7 1.2 Agreement on new Transitional Charter..................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated Plan 2020-24 Annual Action Plan 2020-21 Substantial Amendment
    CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA CONSOLIDATED PLAN 2020-24 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2020-21 SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary of Substantial Amendments 5 Executive Summary ES-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 7 The Process PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b) 13 PR-10 Consultation – 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(I) and 91.315(I) 15 PR-15 Citizen Participation – 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(c) and 91.300(c) 32 Needs Assessment NA-05 Overview 42 NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment - 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c) 43 NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) 52 NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) 55 NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens – 91.205 (b)(2) 58 NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion – 91.205(b)(2) 60 NA-35 Public Housing – 91.205(b) 62 NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment – 91.205(c) 68 NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment - 91.205 (b,d) 75 NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs – 91.215 (f) 78 Housing Market Analysis MA-05 Overview 81 MA-10 Number of Housing Units – 91.210(a)&(b)(2) 82 MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing - 91.210(a) 85 MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing – 91.210(a) 88 MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing – 91.210(b) 91 MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services – 91.210(c) 95 MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services – 91.210(d) 99 MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.210(e) 102 MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets – 91.215 (f)
    [Show full text]
  • East Bay Regional Park District Police Department East Bay Regional Park District Police Policy Manual
    East Bay Regional Park District Police Department East Bay Regional Park District Police Policy Manual LAW ENFORCEMENT CODE OF ETHICS As a law enforcement officer, my fundamental duty is to serve the community; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the constitutional rights of all to liberty, equality and justice. I will keep my private life unsullied as an example to all and will behave in a manner that does not bring discredit to me or to my agency. I will maintain courageous calm in the face of danger, scorn or ridicule; develop self-restraint; and be constantly mindful of the welfare of others. Honest in thought and deed both in my personal and official life, I will be exemplary in obeying the law and the regulations of my department. Whatever I see or hear of a confidential nature or that is confided to me in my official capacity will be kept ever secret unless revelation is necessary in the performance of my duty. I will never act officiously or permit personal feelings, prejudices, political beliefs, aspirations, animosities or friendships to influence my decisions. With no compromise for crime and with relentless prosecution of criminals, I will enforce the law courteously and appropriately without fear or favor, malice or ill will, never employing unnecessary force or violence and never accepting gratuities. I recognize the badge of my office as a symbol of public faith, and I accept it as a public trust to be held so long as I am true to the ethics of police service.
    [Show full text]
  • ROH Chapter 10, Rules, Regulations, Charges and Fees for Public Parks
    Chapter 10 RULES, REGULATIONS, CHARGES AND FEES FOR PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES Articles: 1. Use of Public Parks, Playgrounds, Beaches and Other Public Areas 2. Fees and Charges for Use of Parks and Recreational Facilities 3. Fees for Use of Parks and Recreational Facilities for Commercial Activities 4. Fees for Use of Municipal Golf Courses 5. Commercial Windsurfing (6. Beach and Inland Camping Facilities. Repealed by Ord. 96-49.) 6. Cultural Sites in Public Parks 7. Policy on Fees for Organized Recreational Programs 8. Summer Fun Activities 9. Professional Sports Activity at Hans L'Orange Baseball Facility 10. Rental of Surfboard Lockers on Kuhio Beach (11. Abandoned Property. Repealed by Ord. 11-29.) 11. Reserved 12. After-school Programs Article 1. Use of Public Parks, Playgrounds, Beaches and Other Public Areas Sections: 10-1.1 Definitions. 10-1.2 Park rules and regulations. 10-1.3 Permits.* 10-1.4 Rules and regulations pertaining to street trees, hedges and shrubs. 10-1.5 Public beaches. 10-1.6 Violation--Penalty. 10-1.7 Animals in public parks. Sec. 10-1.1 Definitions. “Camp” or “camping” means the use and occupation of a public park as a temporary or permanent dwelling place or sleeping place between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 5:00 a.m. “Commercial activity” means a use or purpose designed for profit, which includes, but is not limited to, the exchange or buying and selling of commodities; the providing of services relating to or connected with trade, traffic or commerce in general; any activity performed by the commercial operator or its employees or agents in connection with the delivery of such commodities or services; and the soliciting of business, including the display or distribution of notices, business cards, or advertisements for commercial promotional purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Missoula Regional Park PUBLIC COMMENT SUMMARY and FAQ • APRIL, 2015
    Fort Missoula Regional Park PUBLIC COMMENT SUMMARY AND FAQ • APRIL, 2015 In April, 2015, Parks and Recreation and Missoula County Parks and Trails hosted an open house to accept public comment on and answer questions about construction and improvements at Fort Missoula Regional Park. Special thanks to all who participated in the April 2015 workshops and public open house. As we work to bring our park plans from 30% to 100% design detail, input from our park stakeholders, regular user groups, neighbors and park visitors is important. The FMRP Design Team appreciates your time and participation. During the public open house, participants were encouraged to complete a questionnaire about the FMRP. Below are some of the questions and comments we received, along with responses from the Design Team. What did Open House participants like best about the plan for FMRP? • This long-awaited project is finally coming to fruition. • Trail connections to existing & proposed trails that include the Missoula to Lolo Trail. • Thoughtful circulation patterns for both pedestrian and bicycle use. • Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) Era architectural style reinforces the rich history of Fort Missoula. • Updated sports fields. • Dog park. • The history at Fort Missoula is very interesting. • The plan includes lots of open space. • The park plan, design efforts, management, and opportunity at FMRP What are the priorities for the design team as the project approaches the construction phase? 1. Designers have placed a high priority on efficient & thoughtful circulation patterns for bicycle, pedestrian and vehicle traffic. 2. There is considerable Open Space in the current plan. The large center area is approximately 18 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Parks and Trails Use Policy
    2021 PARKS AND TRAILS USE POLICY USE POLICY FOR PARKS, FIELDS, TRAILS AND SHELTERS www.douglas.co.us/dcoutdoors Table of Contents Park Rules and Regulations .................................................................................................................. 1 Bingham Lake Fishing Dock .................................................................................................................. 2 Emergencies .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Field Use Policies .................................................................................................................................. 3 Field Equipment ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Special Events, Tournaments and Picnic Shelter Permits ...................................................................... 7 User Payment and Refund Policy .......................................................................................................... 8 Insurance ............................................................................................................................................... 9 Douglas County Parks, Trails and Building Grounds Contact Information ............................................ 10 2021 Fee Schedule .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Above the Falls Regional Park Master Plan Draft
    DRAFT DRAFT Above the FAlls RegionAl PARk MAsteR PlAn DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT JUNE, 2013 MINNEAPOLIS PARK & RECREATION BOARD Acknowledgements The Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board is grateful to the many individuals, organizations and agency staff who contributed to this regional park plan. The planning process began in 2010 and continued through early 2013, and included the following outreach: • The Minneapolis Riverfront Development Initiative’s 6 large pubilc meetings and dozens of community events in 2011; • Ongoing collaboration with the Above the Falls Citizen Advisory Committe to help shape the planning process and plan content; • More than 60 meetings with community organizations, and 3 large public engagement meetings dedicated to the plan in 2012 and 2013, including multi-lingual outreach conducted in English, Spanish, Hmong and Lao; • Press releases, web postings and comment cards; and • Ongoing inter-agency coordination through the Riverfornt Technical Advisory Committee: • City of Minneapolis • Hennepin County • Mississippi Watershed Management Organization • University of Minnesota • National Park Service • Friends of the Mississippi River • Minneapolis Riverfront Partnership • US Army Corps of Engineers • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Minnesota Historical Society • Minnesota Department of Transportation • Minneapolis Park an&d Recreation Board Images used in this document are property of the Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board unless otherwise credited. More information about this plan and the planning process is available here: http://www.minneapolisparks.org/abovethefalls Notes about this document This DRAFT Above the Falls Regional Park Master Plan (ATF Park Plan) is for public review and comment. Following a 45-day public comment, a final draft will be presented to the Park Board for their consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan
    2040 REGIONAL PARKS POLICY PLAN Proposed for adoption February 2015 The Council’s mission is to foster efficient and economic growth for a prosperous metropolitan region Metropolitan Council Members Susan Haigh Chair Edward Reynoso District 9 Katie Rodriguez District 1 Marie McCarthy District 10 Lona Schreiber District 2 Sandy Rummel District 11 Jennifer Munt District 3 Harry Melander District 12 Gary Van Eyll District 4 Richard Kramer District 13 Steve Elkins District 5 Jon Commers District 14 James Brimeyer District 6 Steven T. Chávez District 15 Gary L. Cunningham District 7 Wendy Wulff District 16 Adam Duininck District 8 The Metropolitan Council is the regional planning organization for the seven-county Twin Cities area. The Council operates the regional bus and rail system, collects and treats wastewater, coordinates regional water resources, plans and helps fund regional parks, and administers federal funds that provide housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income individuals and families. The 17-member Council board is appointed by and serves at the pleasure of the governor. On request, this publication will be made available in alternative formats to people with disabilities. Call Metropolitan Council information at 651-602-1140 or TTY 651-291-0904. Table of Contents Chapter One: Planning for the Twin Cities Region ................................................................................. 5 Thrive MSP 2040 ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Project Manual
    UPTON HILL REGIONAL PARK FURNISH PICNIC SHELTER 6060 Wilson Blvd Arlington, VA 22205 PROJECT MANUAL November 20, 2019 NOVA Parks 5400 Ox Road Fairfax Station, Virginia 22039 CONTENTS Number of Pages 1. Invitation to Bid .......................................................................................................1 2. Form of Proposal .....................................................................................................2 3. Specifications .........................................................................................................2 4. Supplemental General Conditions ...........................................................................1 5. General Conditions………………………………………………………………..8 6. Sample Purchase Contract ......................................................................................3 INVITATION TO BID UPTON HILL REGIONAL PARK FURNISH PICNIC SHELTER 6060 Wilson Blvd Arlington, VA 22205 The NOVA Parks is accepting bids for the provision of a picnic shelter kit for Upton Hill Regional Park. The picnic shelter shall be a Cedar Forest Products Company’s Low Pitch Beam and Hip Pavilion LB 16x28 or an approved equal. Bids will be accepted at the Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority headquarters, 5400 Ox Road, Fairfax Station, Va. 22039, until 1:00 p.m., on Wednesday, December 18th, 2019. Bids should be in a sealed envelope marked “Bid – Upton Hill Picnic Shelter” and must be submitted using the attached Form of Proposal. Facsimile and emailed bids will not be accepted. All bids shall
    [Show full text]
  • Spring / Summer 2021 Contents Support the Press
    Nebraskaspring / summer 2021 Contents Support the Press General Interest 1 Help the University of Nebraska Press continue its New in Paperback/Trade 48 vibrant program of publishing scholarly and general Scholarly Books 58 interest books by becoming a Friend of the Press. Distribution 95 To join, visit nebraskapress.unl.edu or contact New in Paperback/Scholarly 98 Erika Kuebler Rippeteau, grants and development Journals 102 specialist, at 402-472-1660 or [email protected]. Index 103 To find out how you can help support a particular Ordering Information 104 book or series, contact Donna Shear, Press director, at 402-472-2861 or [email protected]. Ebooks are available for every title unless otherwise indicated. Subject Guide African American Studies 32, 52, Fiction 15, 19, 24–25 Military History 10, 18, 39, 43, 63–64, 66 54–56, 77, 80–82 Food & Wine 14, 64 Africa 30–31, 76, 78, 99 Military Studies 11, 37, 42–43 Geography 57, 67, 98, 100 Agriculture 65, 68 Native American & Indigenous Studies 1, Great Plains 1, 29, 57, 60, 95, 101 49, 56, 68, 70–75, 98 American Studies 32, 55, 100 History/American 2–6, 8, 14–16, 20–23, Natural History 69, 101 Anthropology 70–75, 98 36, 38, 48, 55–57, 60–61, 63, 65, 67, 75, 80–82, 98, 100–101 Nebraska 29, 57 Archaeology 70, 95 History/American West 15, 22, 56, Poetry 29, 30–35, 71, 94 Art & Art History 69, 74, 96–97 61–63, 69, 84, 101 Political Science 1, 8–9, 11, 37, 40, Aviation & Spaceflight 10, 57 History/World 9, 12–13, 28, 48, 76–79, 81–83, 98, 100 83, 92, 99 Bible Studies 44 Recreation 36 Humor 26–27,
    [Show full text]