Gentrification in San Francisco's Latina/O Mission

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gentrification in San Francisco's Latina/O Mission Race, Space, and Contestation: Gentrification in San Francisco’s Latina/o Mission District, 1998-2002 By Francisco Diaz Casique A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ethnic Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Patricia Penn Hilden, Chair Professor José David Saldívar Professor Stephen Small Professor Kim Voss Spring 2013 Abstract “Race, Space, and Contestation: Gentrification in San Francisco’s Latina/o Mission District, 1998-2002” By Francisco Diaz Casique Doctor of Philosophy in Ethnic Studies University of California, Berkeley Professor Patricia Penn Hilden, Chair From 1995 to 2005, the San Francisco Bay Area underwent quick and rapid changes as the forces of the “New Economy,” particularly those connected to internet related businesses, pushed the region’s economic engine at warp speed. San Francisco power brokers recognized the economic power of these new internet related firms and worked to lure and retain this new economic force to and within the city. By 1998, their efforts, along with other forces, created an uneven spatial distribution of internet related firms in San Francisco’s eastern quadrant, a historically working-class area of the city. The encroachment of these internet related firms into eastern quadrant neighborhoods like the Mission District, a working-class and predominantly Latina/o area of the city, also brought gentrification. Between 1998 and 2002, the time focus of this dissertation, the upward trend that the “New Economy” had been experiencing since 1995, hit its peak before falling back to earth. During this same time, the pressures of gentrification that had been impacting Mission District residents since 1995 also hit its peak. Commercial, manufacturing and light-industrial space was being converted apace into office space, live/work lofts, and luxury condominiums. Residential evictions in the Mission District easily outpaced those in other parts of the city during this four year stretch as local real estate firms jumped into speculative real estate deals. The displacement of local industries and people combined contributed to significant residential and commercial shifts in the Mission District. In 1998, Mission District activists and residents formally began an anti-displacement movement. This movement, which found its most potent expression in the working-class Latina/o Mission District before radiating out to other San Francisco neighborhoods, demonstrates the need to understand better the importance of space and place for social movement actors. The Mission District’s claim for spatial and social justice also highlights three key themes for social movement scholarship: collective consumption, cultural identity, and political self- management. In the Mission District these three dimensions showed themselves through a geographic struggle over the protection of livable space, the culturally and racially relevant form of protest within a 1 place based identity formation, and efforts to gain greater community control over city planning processes and decision-making procedures. As much as this dissertation examines a social movement, it also expands on the cultural forms of spatialized and geographically scaled protest activity. The latter two are brought to bear through the resistive efforts of a grassroots led community movement that struggled to create, challenge, and reproduce cultural meanings of place that are absolutely inscribed in our socio-spatial landscape. The close focus of this dissertation on a single community movement within one neighborhood in San Francisco highlights larger issues of concern. How normalized processes such as privatization, and gentrification play out across major urban centers of late capitalist society reveals an intense struggle by those displaced as well as those profiting from the changes. While gentrification may be most visible at the local scale, it would be a mistake to not also understand its connecting threads to larger regional and global forces. As such, viewing gentrification through a multi-scaled lens allows one to view the nuanced impacts of larger global neoliberal tendencies and logics in actually existing places (Brenner & Theodore, 2002). These larger tendencies and logics have made the outcomes of contemporary gentrification – further displacement, dislocation and general marginalization of the urban working-class – a durable part of a larger socio-spatial landscape that for so many produces the interruption and/or destruction of everyday life. This project is situated in larger theoretical issues of organized abandonment, “landscape,” mobility/immobility, and the racialized/spatialized outcomes of short-sighted spatial fixes to crises. This project also demonstrates how these unevenly developed landscapes carry the necessary elements for the creation of spatial justice, and the features necessary for “geographies of justice”, features that extend beyond the local scale, having fluid interplay at varying scales. 2 Table of Contents Table of figures………………………………………………………………………………….iii Acknowledgement……………………………………………………………………………….iv Chapter One: Placing Gentrification and the Mission District .................................................1 Laying the Groundwork ..............................................................................................................1 Local Matters, Spatial Justice and Gentrification .......................................................................7 Gentrification Roots and Branches .............................................................................................8 Placing Spatial Contestation ......................................................................................................16 Methodology .............................................................................................................................23 Chapter Construction .................................................................................................................26 Chapter Two: There’s a Different Mix of People Coming in Now ..........................................28 Santa Clara Version 2.0 .............................................................................................................30 No Reason to Exist ....................................................................................................................32 It Was Happening Totally Invisibly ..........................................................................................34 “Artist Lofts,” Faux Industrial Chic and Voluntary Déclassé ...................................................38 People Who Grew Up Here Can’t Afford to Stay Here ............................................................40 Going FAR to Mask Lofts as Office Space ...............................................................................42 It Increased Exponentially Over the Course of a Few Months .................................................45 Latinos Don’t Utilize Valencia Anymore .................................................................................49 It’s Crazy, Hot, Popular .............................................................................................................51 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................53 Chapter Three: Our First Meetings Were Brown Bag Lunches .............................................54 A New Leadership Takes the Lead ...........................................................................................54 MSROC Leads Into MAC .........................................................................................................59 Brown Bags and Saturday Morning Study Sessions .................................................................64 Conclusion: A Big Upsurge in Consciousness ..........................................................................70 Chapter Four: We Felt Pretty Safe Because the Neighborhood Was So Horrible ................72 Painting a Different Picture .......................................................................................................76 This is Really an Economic and Planning Problem ..................................................................83 This is About to be a Hot Political Issue ...................................................................................86 They Picked the Wrong District to Mess With .........................................................................88 1999 Mayoral Race ...................................................................................................................90 Voting With Their Feet .............................................................................................................92 District Elections .......................................................................................................................96 A Twig in a Current ...................................................................................................................99 i Chapter Five: The Taquerias and Bodegas Give it the Feel of a Latino Space ....................100 Works Cited ................................................................................................................................109 Bibliography ...............................................................................................................................121
Recommended publications
  • LGBTQ America: a Theme Study of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer History Is a Publication of the National Park Foundation and the National Park Service
    Published online 2016 www.nps.gov/subjects/tellingallamericansstories/lgbtqthemestudy.htm LGBTQ America: A Theme Study of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer History is a publication of the National Park Foundation and the National Park Service. We are very grateful for the generous support of the Gill Foundation, which has made this publication possible. The views and conclusions contained in the essays are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. © 2016 National Park Foundation Washington, DC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted or reproduced without permission from the publishers. Links (URLs) to websites referenced in this document were accurate at the time of publication. THEMES The chapters in this section take themes as their starting points. They explore different aspects of LGBTQ history and heritage, tying them to specific places across the country. They include examinations of LGBTQ community, civil rights, the law, health, art and artists, commerce, the military, sports and leisure, and sex, love, and relationships. MAKING COMMUNITY: THE PLACES AND15 SPACES OF LGBTQ COLLECTIVE IDENTITY FORMATION Christina B. Hanhardt Introduction In the summer of 2012, posters reading "MORE GRINDR=FEWER GAY BARS” appeared taped to signposts in numerous gay neighborhoods in North America—from Greenwich Village in New York City to Davie Village in Vancouver, Canada.1 The signs expressed a brewing fear: that the popularity of online lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) social media—like Grindr, which connects gay men based on proximate location—would soon replace the bricks-and-mortar institutions that had long facilitated LGBTQ community building.
    [Show full text]
  • 3-8 Lower Polk CBD-Fern Street Mural Project-2021.Pdf
    Mural Design Information Form LEAD ARTIST ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE EMAIL PHONE PROJECT COORDINATOR ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE EMAIL PHONE SPONSORING ORGANIZATION ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE EMAIL PHONE FUNDING SOURCES PROPOSED SITE (address, cross street ) DISTRICT District numbers can be found at http://sfgov.org/elections/district-citywide-maps MURAL TITLE DIMENSIONS ESTIMATED SCHEDULE (start and completion dates) 1. Proposal (describe proposed design, site and theme. Attach a separate document if needed). 2. Materials and processes to be used for wall preparation, mural creation and anti-graffiti treatment. 3. List individuals and groups involved in the mural design, preparation and implementation. Attach the following documents to this form: 1. Lead artist's resume/qualifications and examples of previous work 2. Three (3) letters of community support 3. Letter or resolution approving proposal from city department or; 4. Letter of approval from private property owner along with Property Owner Authorization Form 5. Signed Artist Waiver of Property Rights for artwork placed upon city property or; 6. Signed Artist Waiver of Proprietary Rights financed in whole or in part by city funds for artwork placed upon private property 7. Maintenance Plan (including parties responsible for maintenance) 8. Color image of design 9. One image of the proposed site and indicate mural dimensions Elaine Chu [email protected] 1639 MacArthur Blvd, Oakland CA 94602 (267) 975-4631 www.twinwallsmuralcompany.com Education Maryland Institute College of
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusionary Trail Planning Toolkit
    Inclusionary Trail Planning Toolkit A guide to planning and programming equitable trail networks Funding for this report was provided by the Contents Foreword 1 Section 1: Introduction 2 Inclusionary Planning 2 Equitable Planning 3 Green Gentrification 4 Section 2: Case Studies of Inclusionary Trail Planning 8 Camden, New Jersey 8 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 11 Washington, DC 21 Examples of Successful Programming for Inclusive Trails 23 Section 3: Tools for Planning in Community 27 Community Organizing for Trail Planning 27 Forge Alliances and Building a Base 27 Establishing Buy-in 28 Leadership Development 29 Understanding the Community: Using Data 31 Understanding the Community: Community Mapping 32 Understanding the Community: Employing Social Justice Frameworks 32 Understanding the Community: Is My Community Prone to Gentrification? 33 Planning Events: Origins of Event 36 Planning Events: Outreach for Events 36 Planning Events: Event Logistics 37 Implementation of the Trail: Construction Phase 38 Implementation of the Trail: Celebrate the Opening 39 Implementation of the Trail: Program the Trail 39 Implementation of the Trail: Job Creation 40 Institutional Change 40 Appendix A: Resources for participatory planning events 43 Appendix B: Resources for Data Collection 46 Appendix C: Midwest Academy Racial Justice and Equity Framework 47 Appendix D: Race Forward, Racial Equity Impact Assessments 48 Appendix E: Addressing Gentrification in Communities 50 Appendix F: Training Resources 51 Appendix G: Summary of interviews 53 This report was prepared by Julia Raskin on behalf of the Pennsylvania Environmental Council. Special thanks to the Inclusive Planning Working Group for their expertise, guidance, and time: Shoshanna Akins, Eleanor Horne, Valeria Galarza, Rachel Griffith, and Daniel Paschall.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Cary Cordova 2005
    Copyright by Cary Cordova 2005 The Dissertation Committee for Cary Cordova Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: THE HEART OF THE MISSION: LATINO ART AND IDENTITY IN SAN FRANCISCO Committee: Steven D. Hoelscher, Co-Supervisor Shelley Fisher Fishkin, Co-Supervisor Janet Davis David Montejano Deborah Paredez Shirley Thompson THE HEART OF THE MISSION: LATINO ART AND IDENTITY IN SAN FRANCISCO by Cary Cordova, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December, 2005 Dedication To my parents, Jennifer Feeley and Solomon Cordova, and to our beloved San Francisco family of “beatnik” and “avant-garde” friends, Nancy Eichler, Ed and Anna Everett, Ellen Kernigan, and José Ramón Lerma. Acknowledgements For as long as I can remember, my most meaningful encounters with history emerged from first-hand accounts – autobiographies, diaries, articles, oral histories, scratchy recordings, and scraps of paper. This dissertation is a product of my encounters with many people, who made history a constant presence in my life. I am grateful to an expansive community of people who have assisted me with this project. This dissertation would not have been possible without the many people who sat down with me for countless hours to record their oral histories: Cesar Ascarrunz, Francisco Camplis, Luis Cervantes, Susan Cervantes, Maruja Cid, Carlos Cordova, Daniel del Solar, Martha Estrella, Juan Fuentes, Rupert Garcia, Yolanda Garfias Woo, Amelia “Mia” Galaviz de Gonzalez, Juan Gonzales, José Ramón Lerma, Andres Lopez, Yolanda Lopez, Carlos Loarca, Alejandro Murguía, Michael Nolan, Patricia Rodriguez, Peter Rodriguez, Nina Serrano, and René Yañez.
    [Show full text]
  • March 28, 2014 President Barack
    March 28, 2014 President Barack Obama The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President: We write on behalf of the United States Commission on Civil Rights (hereafter “the Commission”) to request formal recognition and establishment by Congress of January 30th of every year henceforth as a permanent national holiday--National Fred Koremastu Day-- and that the President issue an Executive Order declaring January 30th the Fred Korematsu National Day of Service in recognition of Fred T. Korematsu’s contribution to upholding civil rights and liberties for all citizens in our country. Fred Korematsu is a civil rights champion who was thrust into our public consciousness in 1942, when at the age of 23 he refused to go to the United States’ internment camps established for Japanese Americans in the wake of the 1941 Pearl Harbor attacks.1 Executive Order 9066, issued by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, authorized the Secretary of War and all supporting federal agencies to detain and relocate Americans of Japanese ancestry to internment camps in the interest of national security.2 Mr. Korematsu was arrested and convicted of going against the government’s orders.3 He subsequently appealed, and his case went all the way to the Supreme Court which ruled against Mr. Korematsu.4 For the Commission, this is not merely a part of history, but is personal. Commissioner Michael Yaki’s father and his family were held in an internment camp during World War II. Mr. Korematsu’s case was overturned in 1983 after a pro-bono team of attorneys re- opened his case on the basis of government misconduct after discovering the government had hidden documents which consistently showed the federal government knew that Japanese Americans were not engaged in any acts of sabotage or any other act which could be construed as against the interests of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • 21St Annual 80Th Anniversary of SF General Strike
    LaborFest 2014 80th Anniversary of SF General Strike 21st Annual Fighting For Survival July 5 - July 31 From Rockefeller to Tech Titans LABORFEST, P.O.Box 40983, San Francisco, CA 94140, (415) 642-8066 www.laborfest.net, E-mail: [email protected] Welcome to LaborFest 2014 80th Anniversary of San Francisco General Strike and 100th Anniversary of 1914 Ludlow Massacre LaborFest 2014 takes place on the 80th anniversary of core” and testing schemes, all funded by Walmart (Walton the 1934 San Francisco General Strike which included family), the Kipp Foundation (Fischer family, owners of the longshore as well as maritime workers along the entire the GAP), and the Gates Foundation. This is taking place while West Coast. The gains won by the General Strike of ’34 the tech barons are getting tax subsidies while public and are now under attack, including the de- private workers are increasingly squeezed struction of the union hiring hall, the out of the housing market. right to strike and a living wage for all We will also have our annual labor mar- workers. itime boat trip with historian and trade 2014 is also the 100th anniversary of unionists, who will discuss the history of the Ludlow miners’ massacre in Lud- the development of the Bay Area. We will low, Colorado. The mine owner, John tour the newly constructed eastern span D. Rockefeller, ordered gun-wield- of the San Francisco Bay Bridge that was ing company thugs and the Colorado built with 100% union labor. Thirty-three National Guard to burn out and kill 1934 SF General Strike - by Hayden workers died during the building of the the striking miners and their families.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonardo Reviews Quarterly 2.02 | 2012
    L|R|Q Leonardo Reviews Quarterly 2.02 | 2012 Executive Editor: Roger Malina Editor-in-Chief: Michael Punt Associate Editor: Claudy Op den Kamp www.leonardo.info © ISAST L|R|Q Leonardo Reviews Quarterly 2.02 | 2012 Science, Spectacle and Imagination Executive Editor: Roger Malina Editor-in-Chief: Michael Punt Associate Editor: Claudy Op den Kamp www.leonardo.info © ISAST Leonardo Reviews Leonardo Reviews Reviews Panel Leonardo Reviews is the work of an international Allan Graubard, Amy Ione, Anastasia Filip- panel of scholars and professionals invited from poupoliti, Annick Bureaud, Anna B. Creagh, a wide range of disciplines to review books, exhi- Anthony Enns, Aparna Sharma, Boris Jardine, bitions, DVDs, CDs, websites, and conferences. Brian Reffin Smith, Brigitta Zics, Catalin Brylla, Collectively they represent an intellectual commit- Chris Cobb, Chris Speed, Claudia Westermann, ment to engaging with the emergent debates and Claudy Op den Kamp, Craig Harris, Craig Hilton, manifestations that are the consequences of the Dene Grigar, David Bering-Porter, Dene Grigar, convergence of the arts, science and technology. Eduardo Miranda, Elizabeth McCardell, Ellen Pearlman, Enzo Ferrara, Eugene Thacker, Flor- Leonardo Reviews publishes all reviews received ence Martellini, Flutor Troshani, Franc Cham- from the panel monthly at www.leonardo.info. In berlain, Fred Andersson, Frieder Nake, George addition, four times a year a selection of reviews Gessert, George K. Shortess, Giovanna Cos- is printed in Leonardo and now Leonardo Reviews tantini, Hannah Drayson, Hannah Rogers, Har- Quarterly will be publishing an even larger selec- riet Hawkins, Ian Verstegen, Jac Saorsa, Jack tion as a PDF together with introductory material Ox, Jacques Mandelbrojt, Jan Baetens, Jennifer and overview essays.
    [Show full text]
  • BROKEN PROMISES: Continuing Federal Funding Shortfall for Native Americans
    U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS BROKEN PROMISES: Continuing Federal Funding Shortfall for Native Americans BRIEFING REPORT U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Washington, DC 20425 Official Business DECEMBER 2018 Penalty for Private Use $300 Visit us on the Web: www.usccr.gov U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, Catherine E. Lhamon, Chairperson bipartisan agency established by Congress in 1957. It is Patricia Timmons-Goodson, Vice Chairperson directed to: Debo P. Adegbile Gail L. Heriot • Investigate complaints alleging that citizens are Peter N. Kirsanow being deprived of their right to vote by reason of their David Kladney race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national Karen Narasaki origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices. Michael Yaki • Study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution Mauro Morales, Staff Director because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice. • Appraise federal laws and policies with respect to U.S. Commission on Civil Rights discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or Washington, DC 20425 national origin, or in the administration of justice. (202) 376-8128 voice • Serve as a national clearinghouse for information TTY Relay: 711 in respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, www.usccr.gov religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin. • Submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Landmark Designation Work Program HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 15, 2010
    Executive Summary Landmark Designation Work Program HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 15, 2010 Date: December 8, 2010 Case No.: 2010.2776 Staff Contact: Mary Brown – (415) 575‐9074 [email protected] Reviewed By: Tim Frye – (415) 575‐6822 [email protected] REQUESTED COMMISSION ACTION This informational presentation to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is intended to inform and guide prioritization of the HPC’s Landmark Designation Work Program (Work Program) for FY2010‐2011. There is no action required at this time. Based on the discussion at the December 15, 2010 hearing, the Planning Department (Department) will return with recommendations at the January 19, 2011 HPC hearing. PROJECT BACKGROUND At its August 4, 2010 hearing the HPC directed Department staff to provide background information on Article 10 Landmark designations to date and identify, if any, trends related to the location, property types, social history, and construction dates of existing Landmarks. While there are no specific Landmark designation criteria outlined in Article 10 of the Planning Code, the HPC was also interested in designations that were made primarily for a property’s association with a significant person, event, or cultural group, rather than solely its architectural qualities. It is the Department’s understanding that the analysis contained in this report will be used to inform and prioritize the HPC’s Landmark Designation Work Program (Work Program) for FY2010‐2011. The budget for this fiscal year allocates one full‐time equivalent (FTE) staff to Landmark designation and other related activities as directed by the HPC. Given the number of eligible resources identified in recent surveys and in past Landmark Preservation Advisory Board work programs, and the workload associated with each designation, staffing for only a limited number of designations is feasible.
    [Show full text]
  • Neal R. Gross 1 U.S. Commission on Civil Rights +
    1 U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS + + + + + BRIEFING + + + + + SEXUAL ASSAULT IN THE MILITARY + + + + + FRIDAY, JANUARY 11, 2013 + + + + + The Commission convened in Suite 1150 at 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest, Washington, D.C. at 9:30 a.m., Martin R. Castro, Chairman, presiding. PRESENT: MARTIN R. CASTRO, Chairman ABIGAIL THERNSTROM, Vice Chair ROBERTA ACHTENBERG, Commissioner TODD GAZIANO, Commissioner GAIL L. HERIOT, Commissioner PETER N. KIRSANOW, Commissioner* DAVID KLADNEY, Commissioner MICHAEL YAKI, Commissioner* VANESSA EISEMANN, Parliamentarian * Present via telephone NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 2 STAFF PRESENT: LILLIAN DUNLAP PAMELA DUNSTON, Chief, ASCD YASMIN ELHADY ALFREDA GREENE JENNIFER CRON HEPLER LENORE OSTROWSKY, Acting Chief, PAU ELOISE PLATER EILEEN RUDERT MICHELE YORKMAN COMMISSIONER ASSISTANTS PRESENT: NICHOLAS COLTEN ALEC DEULL TIM FAY JOHN MARTIN CARISSA MULDER MARLENE SALLO ALISON SOMIN NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 3 T-A-B-L-E O-F C-O-N-T-E-N-T-S I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman . 5 II. Panel I: Perspective of Victim and Accused ................. 10 1. Rachel Natelson, Legal Director, Service Women's Action Network (SWAN) 2. Philip D. Cave, Commander, U.S. Navy (Ret.), Law office of Phillip D. Cave (Defense Counsel) 3. Nancy Parrish, President, Protect Our Defenders 4. Bridget Wilson, Major, California Guard, U.S. Army Reserve, Enlisted (Ret.), Rosenstein, Wilson & Dean, P.L.C. (Defense Counsel) - Speakers' Remarks and Questions from Commissioners III.
    [Show full text]
  • Contacting Your Legislators Prepared by the Government Information Center of the San Francisco Public Library (415) 557-4500
    Contacting Your Legislators Prepared by the Government Information Center of the San Francisco Public Library (415) 557-4500 City of San Francisco Legislators Mayor Gavin Newsom Board of Supervisors voice (415) 554-6141 voice (415) 554-5184 fax (415) 554-6160 fax (415) 554-5163 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 200 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244 San Francisco, CA 94102-4689 San Francisco, CA 94102-4689 [email protected] [email protected] Members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors David Chiu, President Eric Mar Michela Alioto-Pier District 3 District 1 District 2 voice (415) 554-7450 voice (415) 554-7410 voice (415) 554-7752 fax (415) 554-7454 fax (415) 554-7415 fax (415) 554-7843 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Carmen Chu Ross Mirkarimi Chris Daly District 4 District 5 District 6 voice (415) 554-7460 voice (415) 554-7630 voice (415) 554-7970 fax (415) 554-7432 fax (415) 554-7634 fax (415) 554-7974 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Sean Elsbernd Bevan Dufty David Campos District 7 District 8 District 9 voice (415) 554-6516 voice (415) 554-6968 voice (415) 554-5144 fax (415) 554-6546 fax (415) 554-6909 fax (415) 554-6255 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Sophie Maxwell John Avalos District 10 District 11 voice (415) 554-7670 voice (415) 554-6975 fax (415) 554-7674 fax (415) 554-6979 [email protected] [email protected] California State Legistature Members from San Francisco Senate
    [Show full text]
  • Hispanic Digital Newspapers in the United States
    ISSN 2373–874X (online) 016-12/2015EN Hispanic Digital Newspapers in the United States Clara González-Tosat 1 Topic: Spanish-language digital journalism in the United States Summary: Analysis of the current state of Hispanic digital journalism in the United States by studying online newspapers published in the country and their quality. Keywords: cyberjournalism, cybermedia, Spanish, Hispanic, design, Internet, press, media Introduction and project basis This report analyzes the current state of Hispanic digital journalism in the United States by studying online newspapers published in the country. This research aims to identify Hispanic cybermedia and their characteristics by analyzing a series of general and specific indicators. Furthermore, this report pays attention to the integration and the evolution of the Internet and its effects on American © Clara González Tosat Hispanic Digital Newspapers in the United States Informes del Observatorio / Observatorio Reports. 016-12/2015EN ISSN: 2373-874X (online) doi: 10.15427/OR016-12/2015EN Instituto Cervantes at FAS - Harvard University © Instituto Cervantes at the Faculty of Arts and Sciences of Harvard University journalistic production in Spanish, a process that justifies the creation and maintenance of Hispanic media in the country as the Latino population increases and constitutes one of the major groups of population in the country. The term “cibermedio” ‘cybermedium’ used throughout the report, is defined as a “content provider that seeks to mediate between facts and the public, that primarily utilizes journalistic criteria and techniques, that makes use of multimedia language, that is interactive and hypertextual, and that is updated and published on the Internet” (Díaz Noci and Salaverría 2003).
    [Show full text]