DOCSLIB.ORG

Ockham on Concepts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ockham on Concepts ASHGATE STUDIES IN MEDIEVAL PHILOSOPHY Ockham on Concepts Series Editors John Marenbon, Trinity College, Cambridge, UK Scott MacDonald, Cornell University, USA Christopher J. Martin, University ofAuckland, New Zealand Simo Knuuttila, Academy ofFinland and the University ofHelsinki, Finland The study of medieval philosophy is flourishing as never before. Historically precise and philosophically informed research is opening up this large but still relatively unknown part of philosophy's past, revealing - in many cases for the first time - the nature of medieval thinkers' arguments and the significance of1teir philosophical CLAUDE PANACCIO achievements. Ashgate Studies in Medieval Philosophy presents some of the best of University ofQuebec in Montreal, Canada this new work, both from established figures and younger scholars. Chronologically, the series stretches from c.600 to c.1500 and forward to the scholastic philosophers of sixteenth and early seventeenth-century Spain and Portugal. The series encompasses both the Western Latin tradition, and the Byzantine, Jewish and Islamic traditions. Authors all share a commitment both to historical accuracy and to careful analysis of arguments of a kind which makes them comprehensible to modern readers, especially those with philosophical interests. Other titles in the series: Theology at Paris, 1316-1345 Peter Auriol and the Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents Chris Schabel ISBN 0 7546 0204 4 Medieval Modal Systems Problems and Concepts Paul Thom ISBN 0 7546 08336 ASHGATE © Claude Panaccio 2004 .. Contents All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. ix The author has asserted his moral right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Acknowledgements Act, 1988, to be identified as the author of this work. Abbreviations xi 1 Published by Introduction Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Notes 3 Gower House Suite 420 5 Croft Road, Aldershot 101 Cherry Street 1: Intuition, Abstraction and Mental Language Hampshire GUll 3HR Burlington, VT 05401-4405 1..Intuitive and abstractive cognitions 5 England USA 2. Mental language 8 IAshgate website: http://www.ashgate.com I 3. Abstraction and universals 9 11 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data 4. Intuition and singular terms Panaccio, Claude, 1946- 5. Mixed cognitions and singular terms of the third type 14 Ockham on concepts. - (Ashgate studies in medieval philosophy) 6. Ockham's representationalism 15 1. William of Ockham, ca. 1285-ca. 13492. Concepts 1. Title Notes 17 189.4 2: Intellectual Acts 21 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data 1. Mental acts and habitus 21 Panaccio, Claude, 1946- 23 Ockham on concepts / Claude Panaccio. 2. From the fictum to the actus p. cm. - (Ashgate studies in medieval philosophy) 3. The rejection of intelligible species 27 Includes bibliographical references and index. 3.1 Species as preconditions for intellectual acts 28 ISBN 0-7546-3228-8 (alk. paper) 1. William, of Ockham, ca. 1285-ca. 1349. 2. Philosophy, Medieval. 3.2 The razor argument against intelligible species 29 3. Concepts. 31 1. Title. II. Series. 4. Combining acts 4.1 Simple and complex units 31 B765.034P36 2004 32 121 '.4-dc22 2004008560 4.2 Propositional acts 4.3 Iudicative acts 35 ISBN 0 7546 32288 Notes 36 Printed and bound in Great Britain·by Antony Rowe Ltd, Chippenham, Wiltshire Typeset by DC Graphic Design Ltd, Swanley, Kent ,.-. vi OCKHAM ON CONCEPTS OCKHAM ON CONCEPTS vii 3: Concepts as Signs 45 7: Concepts as Similitudes 119 1. The problem: how can a concept ever be a sign? 45 1. Similitude sustained 119 2. The two meanings of signum 47 2. Acts and similarities 122 3. Conceptual roles 51 3. Varieties of conceptual representation 125 4. Atomism or propositionalism? 53 3.1 Absolute specific quality concepts 126 5. Types and tokens 55 3.2 Specific concepts of substances 126 Notes 58 3.3 Simple connotative concepts 129 4: Connotative Terms in Mental Language 63 3.4 Simple generic concepts 131 1. Connotative terms 64 4. Two problems about absolute concepts 133 2. Mental connotation 66 4.1 Klima's objection 133 3. Synonymy and nominal definitions 69 4.2 Brown's puzzle 136 4. Connotative terms and exponible propositions 73 Notes 139 Appendix: A reply to Richard Gaskin 74 H: Logical Concepts 145 Notes 77 I. The earlier theory: logical words internalized 146 5: The Role of Nominal Definitions 85 2. Logical constants in the actus-theory 151 1. Four theses about nominal definitions 86 3. Prepositions and non-standard copulas 155 2. What defining amounts to: a reconstruction 89 Notes 158 3. Some consequences 93 l): The Meaning of Words 165 3.1 Definitions and abbreviations 93 I. Subordination 165 3.2 Possession of concepts and knowledge of definitions 94 2. Types and tokens again 171 3.3 Real orderings 95 3. Reverse subordination? The instructive case of proper names 173 Notes 97 Notes 176 6: Cognition and Connotation 103 Conclusion 181 1. Spade's questions 103 Notes 186 2. The acquisition of simple connotative concepts 106 Bihliography 187 3. The adequacy of nominal definitions 110 Index 195 4. Ockham and the Classical View 113 Notes 116 Acknowledgements Most of this book was written between the winter of 2002 and the fall of 2003, as I was releaSed from my regular teaching load; first by a sabbatical leave from the University of Quebec in Trois-Riyieres, and then by a Killam Scholarship from the Canadian. Council for the Arts. The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada also greatly contributed to the fulfilmel)t of the project by awarding it a three-year research grant from 2000 to 2003. I wish to express my sincere gratitude to all three organizations for their generous support. It should be mentioned that some of the developments to be read here partly correspond to previously published papers of mine: • Chapter 1 is closely based on an article originally written in French (,Intuition, abstractionet langage mental dans la theorie occamiste de la connaissance', Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale, 97/1,1992, pp. 61-81). •A preliminary version of chapter 4 has circulated for quite some time among specialists in an informal 'prepublication' format ('Connotative terms in Ockham's mental language', Cahiers d' epistemologie, no. 9016, Montreal, Universite du Quebec a Montreal, 1990, p. 21), and a slightly different one later appeared in French 'in an Italian journal ('Guillaume d'Ockham, les connotatifs et Ie langage mental', Documenti e studi sulla tradizioneJilosojka medievale, 11,2000, pp. 297-316). • Chapter 5 freely makes use of ideas about nominal definitions that I originally presented at the XIIIth European Symposium for Medieval Logic and Semantics held in Avignon in June 2000, in a contribution that was subsequently published in the acts ('Connotative concepts and their definitions in Ockham's nominalism', in La tradition medievale des Categories, Joel Biard and Irene Rosier-Catach, eds, Leuwen: Peeters, 2003, pp. 141-55). • Section 1 of chapter 9 is a revised version of a recent paper in French (,Guillaume d'Ockham et les syncategoremes mentaux: la premiere theorie', Histoire, Epistemologie, Langage, 25/2, 2003, pp. 145-60). I am grateful to the editOJ;s and publishers involved for their role in the original dissemination of this material. The fact is that this book found its motivation in the extraordinarily stimulating - if sometimes critical - reactions these publications, especially the first two ones, elicited, both in print and in private conversations, from a number of outstanding scholars whose names will be found again and again in the following pages. Let me single out at this point those of Joel Biard, Elizabeth Karger, Calvin Normore and Paul Vincent Spade in particular, to whom this whole work, while disagreeing with them on certain points (and sometimes crucial ones), remains in the end deeply indebted, Several portions of the nook have neen orally presented to various audiences in France. Italy. Greece. Ukraine. the US and Canada. and have greatly nenefited from x OCKHAM ON CONCEPTS 'the numerous remarks, questions and objections that were raised on these occasions Abbreviations by colleagues and students. Chapters 3, 5, 6 and 7, most saliently, are elaborations on the Pierre-Abelard Lectures I gave at the University ofParis 4-Sorbonne in March 2001. Special thanks are due, in this respect, to Cyrille Michon, who not only organized these lectures, but who also provided useful and penetrating commentaries on each one of them when they were delivered. Exp. in Perih. Expositio in Librum Perihermenias Aristotelis Expositio in Libros Physicorum Aristotelis Most of all, finally, I should like to thank Cecile Juneau for her remarkably Exp. in Phys. Exp. in Porph. Expositio in Librum Porphyrii de Praedicabilibus patient and professional secretarial work upon the whole manuscript over the years, Exp. in Praedic. Expositio in Librum Praedicamentorum Aristotelis and my beloved companion Claude-Elizabeth Perreault for her constant and Exp. sup. Elench. Expositio super Libros Elenchorum affectionate support day after day whileI was - often single-mindedly! - working at OPh Guillelmi de Ockham Opera Philosophica it. Ord. Ordinatio. Scriptum in Librum Primum Sententiarum OTh Guillelmi de Ockham Opera Theologica Quaest. in Phys. Quaestiones in Libros Physicorum Aristotelis Quaest. Var. Quaestiones Variae Quodl. Quodlibeta Septem Rep. Reportatio. Quaestiones in Libros II, III, IV Sententiarum SL Summa Logicae Summ. Phil. Nat. Summula Philosophiae Naturalis Tract. de Corp. Chr. Tractatus de Corpore Christi Tract. de Quant. Tractatus de Quantitate Introduction This book is an exercise in interpretation. My background conviction is that William of Ockham's nominalism, even if elaborated in the d,istant context of the early fourteenth century, still provides a challenging and fruitful body of theory to be in dialogue with today.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Medieval Western Philosophy: the European Emergence
    Cultural Heritage and Contemporary Change Series I, Culture and Values, Volume 9 History of Western Philosophy by George F. McLean and Patrick J. Aspell Medieval Western Philosophy: The European Emergence By Patrick J. Aspell The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy 1 Copyright © 1999 by The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy Gibbons Hall B-20 620 Michigan Avenue, NE Washington, D.C. 20064 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Aspell, Patrick, J. Medieval western philosophy: the European emergence / Patrick J. Aspell. p.cm. — (Cultural heritage and contemporary change. Series I. Culture and values ; vol. 9) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Philosophy, Medieval. I. Title. III. Series. B721.A87 1997 97-20069 320.9171’7’090495—dc21 CIP ISBN 1-56518-094-1 (pbk.) 2 Table of Contents Chronology of Events and Persons Significant in and beyond the History of Medieval Europe Preface xiii Part One: The Origins of Medieval Philosophy 1 Chapter I. Augustine: The Lover of Truth 5 Chapter II. Universals According to Boethius, Peter Abelard, and Other Dialecticians 57 Chapter III. Christian Neoplatoists: John Scotus Erigena and Anselm of Canterbury 73 Part Two: The Maturity of Medieval Philosophy Chronology 97 Chapter IV. Bonaventure: Philosopher of the Exemplar 101 Chapter V. Thomas Aquinas: Philosopher of the Existential Act 155 Part Three: Critical Reflection And Reconstruction 237 Chapter VI. John Duns Scotus: Metaphysician of Essence 243 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • The Coherence of Stoic Ontology
    The Coherence of Stoic Ontology by Vanessa de Harven A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Prof. Dorothea Frede, Co-chair Prof. Klaus Corcilius, Co-chair Prof. A.A. Long Spring 2012 Abstract The Coherence of Stoic Ontology by Vanessa de Harven Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy University of California, Berkeley Professors Dorothea Frede and Klaus Corcilius, Co-chairs Any thoroughgoing physicalist is challenged to give an account of immaterial entities such as thoughts and mathematical objects. The Stoics, who eagerly affirmed that only bodies exist, crafted an elegant solution to this challenge: not everything that is Something (ti) exists. Rather, some things have a derivative mode of reality they call subsistence: these entities are non-existent in that they are not themselves solid bodies, but they are nonetheless Something physical because they depend on bodies for their subsistence. My dissertation uncovers the unifying principles of Stoic subsistence, and shows how they can account for thoughts and other immaterial entities without running afoul of their physicalist commitments. While all commentators agree that the Stoics posited Something as the highest category of being, they have failed to find a coherent physicalist account of Stoic ontology. For instance, (1) a canonical set of incorporeals (time, place, void, and what is sayable (lekton)) is well attested, but there is little agreement as to what these entities have in common as incorporeals, which makes the category look like an ad hoc collection of left-over entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Thomas Geach, 1916–2013
    PETER GEACH Peter Thomas Geach 1916–2013 PETER GEACH was born on 29 March 1916 at 41, Royal Avenue, Chelsea. He was the son of George Hender Geach, a Cambridge graduate working in the Indian Educational Service (IES), who later taught philosophy at Lahore. George Geach was married to Eleonore Sgnonina, the daughter of a Polish civil engineer who had emigrated to England. The marriage was not a happy one: after a brief period in India Eleonore returned to England to give birth and never returned to her husband. Peter Geach’s first few years were spent in the house of his Polish grandparents in Cardiff, but at the age of four his father had him made the ward of a former nanny of his own, an elderly nonconformist lady named Miss Tarr. When Peter’s mother tried to visit him, Miss Tarr warned him that a dangerous mad woman was coming, so that he cowered away from her when she tried to embrace him. As she departed she threw a brick through a window, and from that point there was no further contact between mother and son. When he was eight years old he became a boarder at Llandaff Cathedral School. Soon afterwards his father was invalided out of the IES and took charge of his education. To the surprise of his Llandaff housemaster, Peter won a scholarship to Clifton College, Bristol. Geach père had learnt moral sciences at Trinity College Cambridge from Bertrand Russell and G. E. Moore, and he inducted his son into the delights of philosophy from an early age.
    [Show full text]
  • Antoine De Chandieu (1534-1591): One of the Fathers Of
    CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): ONE OF THE FATHERS OF REFORMED SCHOLASTICISM? A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN MAY 2013 CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 3233 Burton SE • Grand Rapids, Michigan • 49546-4301 800388-6034 fax: 616 957-8621 [email protected] www. calvinseminary. edu. This dissertation entitled ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): L'UN DES PERES DE LA SCHOLASTIQUE REFORMEE? written by THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy has been accepted by the faculty of Calvin Theological Seminary upon the recommendation of the undersigned readers: Richard A. Muller, Ph.D. I Date ~ 4 ,,?tJ/3 Dean of Academic Programs Copyright © 2013 by Theodore G. (Ted) Van Raalte All rights reserved For Christine CONTENTS Preface .................................................................................................................. viii Abstract ................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1 Introduction: Historiography and Scholastic Method Introduction .............................................................................................................1 State of Research on Chandieu ...............................................................................6 Published Research on Chandieu’s Contemporary
    [Show full text]
  • Western Philosophy Rev
    Designed by John Cornet, Phoenix HS (Ore) Western Philosophy rev. September 2012 The very process of philosophy has been a driving force in the tranformation of the world. From the figure who dwells upon how to achieve power, to the minister who contemplates the paradox of the only truth (their faith) yet which is also stagnent, to the astronomers who are searching the stars for signs of other civilizations, to the revolutionaries who sought to construct a national government which would protect the rights of the minority, the very exercise of philosophy and philosophical thought is at a core of human nature. Philosophy addresses what are sometimes called the "big questions." These include questions of morality and ethics, ideology/faith,, politics, the truth of knowledge, the nature of reality, and the meaning of human existance (...just to name a few!) (Religion addresses some of the same questions, but while philosophy and religion overlap in some questions, they can and do differ significantly in the approach they take to answering them.) Subject Learning Outcomes Skills-Based Learning Outcomes Behavioral Expectations and Grading Policy Develop an appreciation for and enjoyment of Organize, maintain and learn how to study from a learning, particularly in how learning should subject-specific notebook Attendance, participation and cause us to question what we think we know Be able to demonstrate how to take notes (including being prepared are daily and have a willingness to entertain new utilizing two-column format) expectations perspectives on issues. Be able to engage in meaningful, substantive discussion A classroom culture of respect and Students will develop familiarity with major with others.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logic of Where and While in the 13Th and 14Th Centuries
    The Logic of Where and While in the 13th and 14th Centuries Sara L. Uckelman Department of Philosophy, Durham University Abstract Medieval analyses of molecular propositions include many non-truthfunctional con- nectives in addition to the standard modern binary connectives (conjunction, dis- junction, and conditional). Two types of non-truthfunctional molecular propositions considered by a number of 13th- and 14th-century authors are temporal and local propositions, which combine atomic propositions with ‘while’ and ‘where’. Despite modern interest in the historical roots of temporal and tense logic, medieval analy- ses of ‘while’ propositions are rarely discussed in modern literature, and analyses of ‘where’ propositions are almost completely overlooked. In this paper we introduce 13th- and 14th-century views on temporal and local propositions, and connect the medieval theories with modern temporal and spatial counterparts. Keywords: Jean Buridan, Lambert of Auxerre, local propositions, Roger Bacon, temporal propositions, Walter Burley, William of Ockham 1 Introduction Modern propositional logicians are familiar with three kinds of compound propositions: Conjunctions, disjunctions, and conditionals. Thirteenth-century logicians were more liberal, admitting variously five, six, seven, or more types of compound propositions. In the middle of the 13th century, Lambert of Auxerre 1 in his Logic identified six types of ‘hypothetical’ (i.e., compound, as opposed to atomic ‘categorical’, i.e., subject-predicate, propositions) propo- sitions: the three familiar ones, plus causal, local, and temporal propositions [17, 99]. Another mid-13th century treatise, Roger Bacon’s Art and Science of Logic¶ , lists these six and adds expletive propositions (those which use the connective ‘however’), and other ones not explicitly classified such as “Socrates 1 The identity of the author of this text is not known for certain.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Medieval Islamic Philosophy D
    BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MEDIEVAL ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY D. BLACK, CPAMP PROSEMINAR: APRIL 6, 2009 Reference works covering Islamic philosophy A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Ed. J. Gracia and T. Noone. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 2003. (Includes entries on major Islamic figures known to the West.) The Dictionary of Literary Biography, Vol. 115: Medieval Philosophers. Ed. Jeremiah Hackett. Detroit and London: Bruccoli, Clark, Layman, 1992. (Includes many of the major figures among medieval Islamic philosophers.) Encyclopedia of the History of Arabic Science. Ed R. Rashed and R. Morelon. London and New York: Routledge, 1996. Encyclopaedia Iranica. Ed. Ehsan Yarshater. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul; Bibliotheca Persica Press, 1982–. (Excellent articles on Avicenna and Farabi; best overview of the latter’s biography.) The Encyclopaedia of Islam.1 5 vols. Leipzig and Leiden, 1913–38. The Encyclopaedia of Islam.2 Leiden, 1954–. Encyclopedia of Religion. Ed. M. Eliade. New York: Macmillan, 1987. (Good articles on both philosophers and mutakallimūn.) The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Paul Edwards. New York: Macmillan, 1967. (Contains some articles on Islamic philosophy.) The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Edward Craig. 10 vols. London and New York: Routledge, 1998. (Has a full complement of articles on Islamic philosophy, both by figures and by areas of philosophy. Somewhat uneven.) The Stanford Online Encyclopedia of Philosophy. First round of articles on Arabic-Islamic Philosophy is now online. Indices and Bibliographies By far the best bibliographies are those of Druart and Marmura, now being regularly updated online by Druart. In researching any topic in the field, the best course of action is probably to begin with Butterworth and the Druart-Marmura articles and then check out Druart’s updates for more recent material.
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval Philosophy
    | 1 Course Syllabus Medieval Philosophy INSTRUCTOR INFORMATION Dr. Wm Mark Smillie, Professor, Philosophy Department 142 St Charles Hall Email: [email protected]; Ph: 447 - 5416 Office Hours Spring 2017 : MW, 3:30 - 4:30; Th, 2:30 - 4:30; Fri, 2:00 - 3:30; & by appointment. For issues about this course, students can contact me before/after class, at my office hours (posted above), by phone or email (either Carroll email or through moodle email). I will respond to email and phone inquiries within one busine ss day (Saturdays and Sundays are not business days). I will post notifications about the course in the Moodle News Forum. Students should also be aware of the Moodle Calendar that announces assignment deadlines. COURSE INFORMATION PHIL202, Medieval Phil osophy Meets: Tuesday and Thursdays, 9:30 - 10:45, 102 O’Connell; 3 credit hours Course Description This course is an introductory survey of medieval philosophical thought. We will consider some philosophical questions and issues that were central to medieval discussion, including the relationship between faith and reason, the problem of evil, our abili ty to know God’s nature and describe it in human language, the implications of believing in God as a creator, and the famous “problem of universals.” Significant medieval philosophers studied in this course include St. Augustine, Boethius, Peter Abelard, St. Anselm, Avicenna, St. Thomas Aquinas and Bonaventure. An effort will be made to convey general medieval life and values and their connection to medieval philosophy, as well as to relate the thought of the middle Ages to the philosophy of other historic al periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Holcot, O-P-, on Prophecy, the Contingency of Revelation, and the Freedom of God JOSEPH M
    Robert Holcot, O-P-, on Prophecy, the Contingency of Revelation, and the Freedom of God JOSEPH M. INCANDELA In a recent work, William Courtenay refers to the issues in Holcot's writings under discussion in this essay as "theological sophismata."1 That they are. But it is the burden of this essay to suggest that they are more: Holcot's interest in these questions had a funda- mentally practical import, and such seemingly esoteric philosophical and theological speculation was in the service of a pastoral program geared to preaching the faith to unbelievers. For someone in a religious order charged with this mission, questions that may initially appear only as sophismata may actually perform quite different functions when examined in context. Robert Holcot was best known in his own time as a comment tator on the Book of Wisdom. Wey writes that this work "made its author famous overnight and his fame held throughout the next two centuries."2 Wey also proposes that it was because of the rep- utation won with the Wisdom-commentary that Holcot's Sentences- commentary and some quodlibet questions were printed four times 1. William]. Courtenay, Schools and Scholars in Fourteenth Century England (Prince- ton: Princeton University Press, 1987), p. 303. 2. Joseph C. Wey, "The Sermo Finalis of Robert Holcot," Medieval Studies 11 (1949): 219-224, at p. 219. 165 166 JOSEPH M. INCANDELA between 1497 and 1518. His thought was also deemed important enough to be discussed and compared with that of Scotus and Ockham in a work by Jacques Almain printed in 1526.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquinas on Attributes
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by MedievaleCommons@Cornell Philosophy and Theology 11 (2003), 1–41. Printed in the United States of America. Copyright C 2004 Cambridge University Press 1057-0608 DOI: 10.1017/S105706080300001X Aquinas on Attributes BRIAN LEFTOW Oriel College, Oxford Aquinas’ theory of attributes is one of the most obscure, controversial parts of his thought. There is no agreement even on so basic a matter as where he falls in the standard scheme of classifying such theories: to Copleston, he is a resemblance-nominalist1; to Armstrong, a “concept nominalist”2; to Edwards and Spade, “almost as strong a realist as Duns Scotus”3; to Gracia, Pannier, and Sullivan, neither realist nor nominalist4; to Hamlyn, the Middle Ages’ “prime exponent of realism,” although his theory adds elements of nominalism and “conceptualism”5; to Wolterstorff, just inconsistent.6 I now set out Aquinas’ view and try to answer the vexed question of how to classify it. Part of the confusion here is terminological. As emerges below, Thomas believed in “tropes” of “lowest” (infima) species of accidents and (I argue) substances.7 Many now class trope theories as a form of nominalism,8 while 1. F. C. Copleston, Aquinas (Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books, 1955), P. 94. 2. D. M. Armstrong, Nominalism and Realism (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978), pp. 25, 83, 87. Armstrong is tentative about this. 3. Sandra Edwards, “The Realism of Aquinas,” The New Scholasticism 59 (1985): 79; Paul Vincent Spade, “Degrees of Being, Degrees of Goodness,” in Aquinas’ Moral Theory, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Univocity of Substance and the Formal Distinction of Attributes: the Role of Duns Scotus in Deleuze's Reading of Spinoza Nathan Widder
    parrhesia 33 · 2020 · 150-176 the univocity of substance and the formal distinction of attributes: the role of duns scotus in deleuze's reading of spinoza nathan widder This paper examines the role played by medieval theologian John Duns Scotus in Gilles Deleuze’s reading of Spinoza’s philosophy of expressive substance; more generally, it elaborates a crucial moment in the development of Deleuze’s philosophy of sense and difference. Deleuze contends that Spinoza adapts and extends Duns Scotus’s two most influential theses, the univocity of being and formal distinction, despite neither appearing explicitly in Spinoza’s writings. “It takes nothing away from Spinoza’s originality,” Deleuze declares, “to place him in a perspective that may already be found in Duns Scotus” (Deleuze, 1992, 49).1 Nevertheless, the historiographic evidence is clearly lacking, leaving Deleuze to admit that “it is hardly likely that” Spinoza had even read Duns Scotus (359n28). Indeed, the only support he musters for his speculation is Spinoza’s obvious in- terests in scholastic metaphysical and logical treatises, the “probable influence” of the Scotist-informed Franciscan priest Juan de Prado on his thought, and the fact that the problems Duns Scotus addresses need not be confined to Christian thought (359–360n28). The paucity of evidence supporting this “use and abuse” of history, however, does not necessarily defeat the thesis. Like other lineages Deleuze proposes, the one he traces from Duns Scotus to Spinoza, and subsequently to Nietzsche, turns not on establishing intentional references by one thinker to his predecessor, but instead on showing how the borrowings and adaptations asserted to create the connec- tion make sense of the way the second philosopher surmounts blockages he faces while responding to issues left unaddressed by the first.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy 125 — Day 9: Overview Nominalism XVII: Metalinguistic
    Branden Fitelson Philosophy 125 Lecture 1 Branden Fitelson Philosophy 125 Lecture 2 ' $ ' Philosophy 125 — Day 9: Overview $ Nominalism XVII: Metalinguistic Nominalism 2 • Administrative Stuff • Metalinguistic nominalists think that realists and austere nominalists make the same kind of mistake: thinking that there must be some non-lingusitic entities – Guest Lecture Thursday: Ed Zalta on Abstract Objects to which terms like “courage” (in, e.g., “Courage is a virtue”) refer. ∗ Introducing Ed — via iChatAV – First Paper Topics and S.Q.s announced last week (see website) • For realists, these entities are universals, for austere nominalists, the entities are concrete particulars (e.g., courageous persons). The metalingustic – Lectures should be up to date (sometimes I fiddle before lecture) nominalist thinks both the realist and the austere nominalist are incorrect. • Agenda: Nominalism • Carnap sketches how a systematic and precise metalinguistic nominalistic – Metalingusitc Nominalism theory might be worked out. Carnap proposes (roughly) that claims like ∗ Carnap’s Naive Proposal “Courage is a virtue” get unpacked as claims about predicates in languages: ∗ Sellars’ Refinement ∗ Residual Problems “Courage is a virtue” 7→ “ ‘Courageous’ is a virtue predicate”. “Trangularity is a shape” 7→ “ ‘Triangular’ is a shape predicate”. – Trope Theory ∗ The best of both worlds? • Problems: (1) Linguistic types vs linguistic tokens (trading new universals for ∗ Plus set theory? old ones?), (2) Language relativity (abs. claims don’t seem language relative). & Nominalism (Cont’d) 09/23%/03 & Nominalism (Cont’d) 09/23/03 % Y¿yellow[0pt]c Branden Fitelson Philosophy 125 Lecture 3 Branden Fitelson Philosophy 125 Lecture 4 ' Nominalism XIX: Metalinguistic Nominalism 4 $' Nominalism XX: Metalinguistic Nominalism 5 $ • Sellars addresses this first problem (for nominalism) of linguistic types/tokens • To address problem (2), Sellars introduces what he calls dot-quotation.
    [Show full text]