Special Sessions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SPECIAL SESSIONS SpS 1: Contaminated Land in the EU Accession Countries S. :RáNRZLF] ' &KRURPD VNL : :RáNRZLF] 5 Strzelecki Liquidation and recultivation of repositories containing unwanted pesticides in Poland: current status and perspectives for solving the problem SpS 2 : Risk Based Land management (RBLM): Kempen Case T. Edelman Six key factors in solving a serious environmental heavy metal problem in the Netherlands SpS 5: Site Specific Ecological Risk Assessment: Where Are We Now? J. van Wensem Introduction to Special Session 5: Site specific ecological risk assessment; where are we now? J. Jensen Bioavailability J. Faber Higher tier field research in ecological risk assessment: a case study T. Crommentuijn Implementation of SS-ERA as a regulatory tool – What to take into consideration J. Römbke, J. Weeks The feasibility of bioassays in site-specific ecological risk assessment (SS-ERA) SpS 7: Permeable Reactive Barriers or Zones L. Diels, L. Bastiaens, S. O’Hannessin, J.L. Cortina, P.J. Alvarez, M. Ebert, H. Schad Permeable Reactive Barriers: a multidisciplinary approach of a new emerging sustainable groundwater treatment technology SpS 9: The Industrial Waste Landfill at Bonfol (Switzerland) C.G. Arnold, R. Bentz, M. Fischer, R.A. Hürzeler, B. Matter, C.D. Munz The industrial waste landfill at Bonfol (Switzerland) SpS 10: Agriculture as Source of Contamination: Bioremediation and Risk Assessment G.A. Zharikov, I.I. Starovoitov, I.T. Ermakova, T.V. Shushkova Microbiological degradation of products for detoxication of chemical weapons and organophosphoric herbicides G.A. Zharikov, V.V. Kapranov, N.I. Kiseleva, O.A. Krainova, V.P. Dyadishcheva, R.V. Borovick, N.R. Dyadishchev Demonstration trials of the technology for bioremediation "in situ" of soils contaminated by polychlorinated biphenyls A. Nurzhanova, P. Kulakow, G. Turner, A. Sedlovskiy, I. Rakhimbayev, K. Zhambakin, S. Kalygin, L. Niketevich, L. Erickson The need for remediation of pesticide-contaminated soils in Kazakhstan Konstantin Popov Elektrokinetic soil remediation enhancement by complexants E. Kovalenko,Y. Popov, A. Korchevsky Development of methods for remediation of soils with increased contents of heavy metals, taking into account the population health indicators V.A. Breus, S.A. Neckludov, A.V. Kosterin, I.P. Breus, Yu.N. Deryugin Soil protection and remediation: using natural materials against technogeneous contamination A. Vorobyov, A. Marchenko, O. Rudneva, M. Radosevich, R. Borovick Surfactant producing TNT-degrading microorganisms for bioremediation N.M. Barysheva, E.V. Polyakov, V.N. Udachin Contamination and remediation of soil of the town Karabash (Ural, Russia) A. Konoplev, L. Alexeeva, T. Bobovnikova, A. Bulgakov, G. Chernik, A. Popova Assessing contamination of soil with PCBs and its health effect in Serpukhov (Moscow region) E.S. Kuropatenko, L.I. Ilyin, E.G. Drozhko, N.A. Koshurnikova Evaluation of the potential health risks resulting from worker and public exposures to toxic and radioactive substances in the Chelyabinsk region A. Savinkov, S. Mamadaliyev, G. Voigt Study of regularities ruling radionuclides transition from different soils of Kazakhstan to meadow grasses and crop plants Y. Skurlatov, E. Shtamm, L. Ernestova, G. Yaskevich, A. Sevan’kaev New approach to natural water gentoxicity assessment - development of the system of ecotoxicological control in the territories subjected to radioactive and/or chemical contamination G. Kvesitadze, T. Mitaishvili, T. Sadunishvili Absorbtion and transformation of benzene derivatives in plants A. Marchenko, A. Vorobyov, N. Dyadishchev, R. Borovick, M. Sokolov The plant associated rhizosphere bacteria for phytoremediation of PAHs-polluted soil B. Korobitsyn Soil contamination in the Ural industrial region as a health risk factor SpS 12: US-German Bilateral Working Group A. Gatchett, M. Edelwirth, J. Heidborn, A. Vega Mission, work program, and status U. Ferber, K. Schmitz, V. Schrenk, K. Steffens, A. Vega, R. Argus Smart guidance as a tool for planning and decision making B. Barczewski, D. MacCourt, S. Tomerius, S. Schock, R. Argus The bilateral workshops – first focus: financing C. Costopoulos, T. Smith, K. Steffens The role of interstate working groups in site redevelopment SpS 14: Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: a Multi-Stakeholder Debate J. Lowe, K. Millar, P. Nathanail, D. Grimski, U. Ferber Workshop to be managed and directed by the CABERNET Coordination Team SpS 15: Risk, Media and the Social Amplification of Soil Contamination S. Ouboter Risks, media and the social amplification of soil contamination SpS 16: Groundwater Risk Assessment: Science and Policy D. Werner, P. Höhener Groundwater risk assessment at contaminated sites (GRACOS): diffusive gas tracer tests for parameter determination in the unsaturated zone M. Bittens, G. Prokop Application and praxis report of EU FP5 Research Results in the area key Action water – pollution prevention: Are results Fit for Use ? J. Frauenstein, V. Franzius, D. Grimski, P. Bardos Federal Environmental Agency UBA, Germany Summary EUGRIS: European Sustainable Land and Ground water Management Information System T. Ertel UW-Umweltwirtschaft, Germany Summary JOINT: Joint Technical Approach for Soil and Groundwater Quality Management SpS 17: Micro-emulsions: an Efficient Solution for the in situ-Remediation of DNAPL-contaminated Sites G. Subklew, B. Barczewski, E. Kohlmeier, A. Tiehm Microemulsion – an efficient solution for the in situ-remediation of DNAPL-contaminated sites – The project network: general overview on the research and field test activities M. Stuhrmann, J. Schlüpen Design of hydraulic systems for in-situ remediation of DNAPLs with microemulsion F. Seitz, E. Kohlmeier, T. Schenk Field studies for the application of microemulsions B. Memminger, B. Barczewski, N. Fütterer, J. Schlüpen, L. Fürst, H. Hasse Microemulsion Enhanced In-situ Remediation – Recycling Concepts for the Additive A. Tiehm, H. Schell, M. Stieber Biodegradation of microemulsion components SpS 18: Is One Fibre of Asbestos in Soil Too Much? T. Scott, R. McFarland, G. Pickford Is one fibre of asbestos in soil too much? SpS 19: In situ Measurement of Contaminants in the Subsurface: "Methods and Field Applications" B. Barczewski, J. Flachowsky Strategies and technologies for in-situ site assessment K. Batereau, F. Bender, A. Voigt, A. Skrypnik, M. Rapp Field Measurements of Soil Gas C. Bracht, G. Matz Percussion Drilling Cone Penetrometer with Wireless Operating in-tip Gaschromatograph M. Müller, N. Klaas, B. Barczewski, J. Bürc In-situ measurement of dissolved contaminants in groundwater C.C.D.F. van Ree, S. Alcock Activities of the SENSPOL and the NICOLE network concerning field investigations at contaminated sites SpS 20: Short Rotation Coppice and Organic Matter Recycling as Integrated Tools for Land Remediation and Helping Local Communities: Environmental, Economic and Social Aspects M. Paulson, P. Bardos, J. Harmsen, J. Wilczek, M. Barton, D. Edwards The practical use of short rotation coppice in land restoration SpS 21: Four Successfully Completed Clean-ups Treating Different Kinds of Contaminants A. Bachmann, R. Bentz, R.A. Hürzeler, B. Matter 4 successfully completed clean-ups treating different kinds of contaminants SpS 23: Manufacturing Gas Plant Site Management J. Allain The management and rehabilitation of former gas works sites led by Gaz de France A. Coleman, A. Gogan-Tilstone Redevelopment of Manufactured Gas Plant Sites in the United States S. Wallace The sustainable management of former gas works sites under the part IIA contaminated land regime SPECIAL SESSIONS SpS 1 Special Session Contaminated Land in the EU Accession Countries LIQUIDATION AND RECULTIVATION OF REPOSITORIES CONTAINING UNWANTED PESTICIDES IN POLAND: CURRENT STATUS AND PERSPECTIVES FOR SOLVING THE PROBLEM Stanisław Wołkowicz, Dariusz Choromański, Wojciech Wołkowicz, Ryszard Strzelecki Polish Geological Institute, 4 Rakowiecka, 00-975 Warsaw Phone: +48 22 849 53 51, Fax: +48 22 849 53 42, Emails: swol@pgi,waw.pl, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Introduction The repositories containing unwanted pesticides are a serious geoenvironmental problem in Poland. Foundation of special objects, later called “tombs”, has began in 1965, when in the regions of southern Poland a relatively small amount of unwanted pesticides as well as their packages were buried directly in the ground. These places were commonly located nearby the stores of the agricultural co-operatives. Because the amount of unwanted pesticides successively increased, in 1971 a special “Instruction”, which precised the type of constructions in which such products should be stored, was prepared. The recommended repository included up to several tens of concrete wells with a diameter 1-2 m and 3-4 m deep. Moreover, various military fortifications were used as repositories, from the bunkers of the IInd World War to the Prussian and Russian forts of XIXth century. In the “tombs”, besides the unwanted pesticides, were also collected the overdue drugs and small amounts of chemical reagents from school laboratories. Location of “tombs” has never been proceeded by any geological recognition. Most often the repositories were located outside villages but there are also known cases of the “tombs” placed near inhabited areas. Foundation of new repositories was stopped at the beginning of the 80-ties but till the end of that decade the unwanted pesticides and their packages were stored in the existing constructions. These “tombs”