DOCSLIB.ORG

Etoposide Compared with the Combination of Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Etoposide Compared with the Combination of Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer Thorax 1989;44:215-219 Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.44.3.215 on 1 March 1989. Downloaded from Etoposide compared with the combination of vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in the treatment of small cell lung cancer M B McILLMURRAY, R J BIBBY, BE TAYLOR, L P ORMEROD, J R EDGE, R J WOLSTENHOLME, R F WILLEY, J F O'REILLY, N HORSFIELD, C E JOHNSON, C P MUSTCHIN, D BRISCOE From the Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster; Victoria Hospital, Blackpool; Royal Preston Hospital, Preston; Blackburn Royal Infirmary, Blackburn; Marsden Hospital, Burnley; Furness General Hospital, Cumbria; Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle; and Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan ABSTRACT One hundred and three patients with small cell lung carcinoma were stratified according to stage ofdisese (47 limited disease, 56 extensive disease) and then randomised to receive etoposide 300 mg/m2 alone for two days or a combination (VAC) of vincristine 1 mg/m2, doxorubicin (Adriamycin) 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m2. The drugs were given at three week intervals. Patients were assessed after three cycles of treatment and continued with the same regimen ifin complete remission and with the alternative regimen ifin partial remission; they were withdrawn if the disease had progressed. Twenty four patients (23%) achieved complete remission and this copyright. occurred more often when patients were receiving VAC (19 of82) than etoposide (5 of75). There was no difference, however, in overall survival between those initially treated with etoposide and those having combination chemotherapy, whether for limited disease (both 8 months) or extensive disease (7 and 5 5 months). Toxicity was less with etoposide. Survival was disappointing, especially with limited disease, even in patients who showed a complete response to treatment. http://thorax.bmj.com/ Introduction regimens. We have evaluated the response and survival of patients with small cell lung cancer using Small cell lung cancer disseminates early and is two simple treatment regimens in a comparative study: generally treated with chemotherapy rather than sur- a combination of vincristine, doxorubicin (Adria- gery or radiotherapy. Widely varying chemoth- mycin), and cyclophosphamide (VAC), which is erapeutic regimens have been used and response rates relatively safe but unpleasant because of gastrointes- on September 26, 2021 by guest. Protected are high.' Relapse is common, however, and most tinal side effects and hair loss2; and a single agent patients die from their disease. A complete response to regimen using the podophyllotoxin derivative treatment is associated with prolonged survival and etoposide, one of the most active drugs against small treatment regimens have become more complex and cell lung cancer,3 which may be less toxic. The aggressive in the hope of increasing the proportion of comparison was made in a randomised study with a patients achieving a complete response. The toxicity of crossover design, so that patients not responding these regimens, however, is such that their use is completely to one treatment were not denied the questionable for all but a few selected patients; for possibility of a response to the other. most patients treatment offers palliation rather than cure. Small cell lung cancer is therefore often treated Methods with less toxic, easily manageable, outpatient Ethical approval was granted by the district ethical Address for reprint requests: Dr M B Mclllmurray, Royal Lancaster committees and informed consent was obtained from Infirmary, Lancaster LAI 4RR. patients participating in the study. Accepted 9 December 1988 Patients were eligible if they had histologically 215 216 McIllmurray, Bibby, Taylor, et al Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.44.3.215 on 1 March 1989. Downloaded from confirmed small cell lung cancer not previously treated Table 1 Patients' characteristics with drugs or radiotherapy, were aged less than 70 years, and had a Karnofsky performance score of Etoposide VAC more than 40.4 Patients with evidence of cerebral metastases were not included. Number 51 52 Extent ofdisease Patients were stratified into two groups according to Limited 25 22 the extent of their disease after clinical, biochemical, Extensive 26 30 Age (y): mean 62 58 radiological and bronchoscopic evaluation. Com- range 38-75 37-70 puted tomography and bone marrow examinations Sex (M:F): 28:23 24:28 were not out. tumour to Performance score (Karnofsky) carried Patients with limited mean 84 83 one hemithorax, the mediastinum, or the ipsilateral range 40-100 50-100 supraclavicular lymph nodes or any combination of VAC-vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide. these were defined as having limited disease. Patients not fulfilling these criteria were defined as having groups were evenly matched for age, sex, performance extensive disease. score, and extent of disease. Patients were randomly allocated either to a group receiving etoposide 300 mg/m2 in 0 9% saline given LIMITED DISEASE intravenously over one hour on day 1 and the same Ofthe 47 patients with limited disease, 25 were initially dose orally on day 2 or to a group receiving the randomised to receive etoposide. After three courses combination of vincristine 1 mg/m2, doxorubicin of treatment three patients were in complete and 13 in 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m2 given partial remission (combined response rate 64%). Five intravenously on day 1. Treatment was repeated at patients with progressive disease were withdrawn. Of three weekly intervals, with dose adjustments for bone the remaining 20 patients, 17 were given VAC and marrow toxicity based on pretreatment blood counts three of these were in complete remission after three (reduction to 75% dose for leucocyte count < 3000/ courses of treatment. mm3 or platelet count < 100 000/mm3; reduction to Twenty two patients with limited disease were < or 50% dose for leucocyte count 2500/mm3 platelet initially randomised to receive VAC. After threecopyright. count < 75 000/mm3; delay in treatment of one week courses oftreatment five patients were in complete and for leucocyte count < 2000/mm3 or platelet count < 10 in partial remission (combined response rate 68%). 50 000/mm3). Four patients with progressive disease were with- All patients were assessed for response in the week drawn. Of the remaining 18 patients 13 were given before the fourth cycle of treatment. Patients in etoposide and one of these patients was in complete http://thorax.bmj.com/ complete remission-that is, no detectable tumour on remission after three courses of treatment. chest radiograph or at bronchoscopy-were given the Complete remission was attributable to VAC in same regimen until relapse or for a total of 12 courses eight patients and to etoposide in four, the overall rate of treatment. Patients in partial remission-that is, being 25%. The median survival for both treatment over 50% reduction in all measurable features of the groups was eight months. Actuarial survival curves are tumour-and patients with stable disease were given shown in figure 1. the alternative regimen for three further courses of treatment and were then reassessed. If they were then EXTENSIVE DISEASE in complete remission the same regimen was continued Of the 56 patients with extensive disease, 26 were on September 26, 2021 by guest. Protected for a further six cycles or until relapse. Doxorubicin initially randomised to receive etoposide. After three was dropped from the combination when the maxi- courses of treatment one patient was in complete and mum recommended doses had been reached. Patients six in partial remission (combined response rate 27%). showing disease progression were withdrawn. Meto- Twelve patients with progressive disease were with- clopramide 20 mg intravenously was given as standard drawn. Of the remaining 14 patients, 13 were given antiemetic treatment with chemotherapy, followed VAC and a further four patients were in complete by prochlorperazine suppositories. No patient was remission after three courses of treatment. treated with radiotherapy. Of the 30 patients initially randomised to receive VAC, seven patients were in complete and nine in Results partial remission (combined response rate 53%) after three courses of treatment. Twelve patients with One hunded and three patients were recruited to the progressive disease were withdrawn. Eleven of the study from eight treatment centres in North West remaining 18 patients were given etoposide but none England from April 1983 to April 1986. Their charac- had achieved a complete response after three courses teristics are shown in table 1. The two treatment of treatment. Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.44.3.215 on 1 March 1989. Downloaded from Etoposide compared with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in small cell lung cancer 217 - - Extensive disease - ETOPOSIDE -A- " " - VAC - - Limited disease - ETOPOSIDE - VAC -j Fig 1 Actuarial WIL survival rates in patients with 0 limited disease and )I- extensive disease treated I' by vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) or by etoposide. 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 40 MONTHS copyright. _ http://thorax.bmj.com/ : _ _ .. _ 90 * § I *. _ * , C R so- l___ _ ___--- p R 70 : : £ 60- : on September 26, 2021 by guest. Protected : ,_, ILU. 0 50 - : 2 1_ _ Fig Actuarial - : survival rates in all U ..: , - 40- to * I___ patients according 0 response to : chemotherapy. CR- 8 30- ...... complete response; PR- * _ _ .........................,_, partial response; NR- no 20- ........................... , : @_ _ _ response. ... _ *§§.§...... , _ ,_, 10- : ....... , * I___ f * * 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 40 :MONTHS a Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.44.3.215 on 1 March 1989. Downloaded from 218 McIllmurray, Bibby, Taylor, et al 100- 90- 80- - 0- ETOPOSIDE - - VAC (ALL PATIENTS) 70- K 60- Fig 3 Actuarial survival ratesfor all to M patients according - initial treatment. VAC- C 40- vincristine, doxorubicin, 0 10 30- and cyclophosphamide. 10 lfiillIlIlIlIj,,L 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 40 MONTHS copyright. Complete remission was attributable to VAC in 11 TOXICITY patients and to etoposide in one patient, the overall There were no drug related deaths.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vincristine (Conventional): Drug Information
    Official reprint from UpToDate® www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate® Vincristine (conventional): Drug information Copyright 1978-2017 Lexicomp, Inc. All rights reserved. (For additional information see "Vincristine (conventional): Patient drug information" and see "Vincristine (conventional): Pediatric drug information") For abbreviations and symbols that may be used in Lexicomp (show table) Special Alerts Vincristine Sulfate Safety Alert October 2015 Health Canada is notifying health care providers that certain lots of Hospira’s vincristine sulfate 1 mg/mL injection (DIN 02183013: 2 mL vial, list #7077A001; 5 mL vial, list #7082A001) have incorrect or outdated safety information on the inner/outer labels and package insert, which may increase the risk to patients and may result in significant patient harm requiring medical intervention. These warnings include: - Vincristine should only be administered by the intravenous (IV) route. Administration of vincristine by any other route can be fatal. - Syringes containing this product should be labeled “Warning - for IV use only.” - Extemporaneously prepared syringes containing this product must be packaged in an overwrap which is labeled “Do not remove covering until moment of injection. For IV use only - fatal if given by other routes.” - Contraindication of vincristine in patients with demyelinating Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndrome. - Potential risk of acute shortness of breath when vincristine is coadministered with mitomycin-C and GI toxicities including necrosis with administration of vincristine. Health care providers are requested to consult with the approved Canadian product monograph for vincristine sulfate 1 mg/mL for the most updated information. Consumers with questions should contact their health care provider for more information. ALERT: US Boxed Warning Experienced physician: Vincristine should be administered by individuals experienced in the administration of the drug.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Human Fibroblast Interferon on the Antiviral Activity of Mammalian Cells Treated with Bleomycin, Vincristine, Or Mitomycin C1
    [CANCER RESEARCH 43, 5462-5466. November 1983] Effect of Human Fibroblast Interferon on the Antiviral Activity of Mammalian Cells Treated with Bleomycin, Vincristine, or Mitomycin C1 Robert J. Suhadolnik,2 Yosuke Sawada,3 Maryann B. Flick, Nancy L. Reichenbach, and Joseph D. Mosca3 Department of Biochemistry, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140 ABSTRACT protein kinase (2,9,28,34,36). In addition to the use of interferon in the treatment of cancer (1, 11, 12, 29, 34), combination Bleomycin, vincristine, or mitomycin C, when added to HeLa chemotherapy of interferon and methotrexate, c/s-platinum diam- cells simultaneously with human fibroblast interferon (IFN-0), minedichloride, cyclophosphamide, or 1,3-bis(/i-chloroethyl)-1- caused a decrease in cell density and inhibited DMA synthesis nitrosourea on either tumor cells in culture or in leukemic mice compared with HeLa cells treated with IFN-/3 alone. However, has been reported (5, 7, 10, 25). Furthermore, Stolfi ef al. (37) the IFN-0-induced antiviral processes were unaffected by the reported recently that the administration of mouse interferon to presence of these drugs as determined by in vitro enzyme assays mice following the administration of 5-fluorouracil protected the and the development of the antiviral state in the intact HeLa cell. mice from mortality. Because it is possible to selectively inhibit HeLa cells treated with IFN-/Õalone or with IFN-/3 in combination proliferation of tumor cells with chemotherapeutic drugs, we with bleomycin, vincristine, or mitomycin C were able to induce reasoned that the ability of the normal cell to maintain the antiviral the double-stranded RNA-dependent adenosine triphos- phate:2',5'-oligoadenylic acid adenyltransferase (EC 2.2.2.-) and state might be adversely affected by such drugs and that the antiproliferative action of interferons might affect the activity of the double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase.
    [Show full text]
  • Eliminating Vincristine Administration Events
    Issue 37 October 2017 Eliminating vincristine administration events Issue: Despite the usually deadly consequences of accidentally administering the chemotherapy drug vincristine intrathecally, adverse events still occur, typically because some organizations still administer vincristine via syringe. The good news is that these events are happening less in the United States, mostly because of the efforts of leading national organizations to promote an effective prevention strategy that assures a mechanical barrier to intrathecal administration (into the subarachnoid space). The strategy involves diluting intravenous vincristine or other vinca alkaloids in a minibag that contains a volume that is too large for intrathecal administration (e.g., 25 mL for pediatric patients and 50 mL for adults), making it mechanically difficult to accidentally administer intrathecally.1 Vinca alkaloids (vinblastine, vinorelbine, vincristine, and vincristine liposomal) are chemotherapy drugs that are intended to be administered intravenously. If given intrathecally, vincristine is nearly always fatal and associated with an irreversible, painful ascending paralysis.2 When vinca alkaloids are injected intrathecally, destruction of the central nervous system occurs, radiating out from the injection site. The few survivors of this adverse event experienced devastating neurological damage.1 Part of the problem stems from ordering intravenous vincristine in conjunction with medications that are administered intrathecally via a syringe, such as methotrexate, cytarabine and hydrocortisone. In some adverse events, vincristine was mistakenly injected into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients when the intent was to inject another intrathecal chemotherapy agent, such as methotrexate or cytarabine.3 Intravenous vincristine and other vinca alkaloids are dispensed from the pharmacy with explicit warning labels about their lethality if given intrathecally.
    [Show full text]
  • Vincristine Archive File
    Vincristine archive file Vincristine is a vinakaloid, which was first discovered 1958 in the tropical plant Catharanthus roseus, native in Madagascar. Its ability to inhibit the metaphase of the mitosis by suppressing the polymerization of the microtubule makes it very important as a chemotherapeutic agent, especially against non-Hodgkin lymphomas and Wilms' tumor. History: Vinblastine and Vincristine are bisindole alkaloids and both widely known for their use as antitumor drugs. In former times they were isolated in trace quantities from the leaves of Catharanthus roseus. Because of their importance in the medical field numerous researches were examining the structure, use and synthesis of Vinblastine, Vincristine and their derivates. Their biological effect to inhibit the microtubule formation and mitosis was and still is a very important part of medical cancer therapy. They were both among the first natural products whose structures were identified by X-ray crystallography and among the first for which X-ray analysis of a heavy atom derivative was used to establish their absolute configuration. ( 2) Timeline: 1958 Vinblastine was first discovered as an unexpected myelosuppressive agent by Noble, R. L., C. T. Beer, and J. H. Cutts during the search for an antidiabetic agent in Catharanthus roseus (myelosupression decreased activity of the bone marrow) 1959 independendently researchers from Eli Lilly (Johnson, I. S., J. G. Armstrong, M. Gorman, and J. P. Burnett, Jr.)discovered that the extracts of C. roseus Possesses activity against
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Activity of Vincristine and Vinblastine Against Cultured Cells1 ;
    [CANCER RESEARCH 44, 3307-3312, August 1984] Differential Activity of Vincristine and Vinblastine against Cultured Cells1 ; Peter J. Ferguson,2 J. Robert Phillips, Milada Seiner, and Carol E. Cass3 Cancer Research Group (McEachern Laboratory) [P. J. F., J. Ft. P., M. S., C. E. C.] and Department of Biochemistry [P. J. F., C. E. C.¡,University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H7 ABSTRACT determine if differential activity is related to differences in uptake4 or release of drug. Included were cells from these established Vincristine and vinblastine exhibit differential activity against lines: mouse neuroblastoma; mouse leukemia L1210; mouse tumors and normal tissues. In this work, a number of cultured lymphoma S49; HeLa; and human promyelocytic leukemia HL- cell lines were assayed for their sensitivity to the antiproliferative 60. Drug sensitivity in each cell line was determined by assaying and cytotoxic effects of the two drugs following short-term (4 hr) inhibition of proliferation during a continuous exposure to either or during continuous exposures. Differential activity was not drug or by assaying colony formation following a 24-hr exposure. seen when cells were subjected to continuous exposures. The Because of rapid loss of Vinca alkaloids from human serum concentrations of Vincristine and vinblastine, respectively, that following an i.v. bolus injection (11, 12,14, 17), the sensitivity of inhibited growth rates by 50% were: mouse leukemia L1210 cells to short-term (1- and 4-hr) exposures was also determined cells, 4.4 and 4.0 nw; mouse lymphoma S49 cells, 5 and 3.5 nM; for both drugs. Although there were differences in sensitivity to mouse neuroblastoma cells, 33 and 15 nw; HeLa cells, 1.4 and vincristine and vinblastine between cell lines, there was little or 2.6 nw; and human leukemia HL-60 cells, 4.1 and 5.3 nM.
    [Show full text]
  • SAVACM Protocol
    BC Cancer Protocol Summary for the Treatment of Sarcomas with Pelvic Primaries or Chemotherapy-Induced Hematuria using vinCRIStine, DOXOrubicin, Cyclophosphamide and Mesna Protocol Code SAVACM Tumour Group Sarcoma Contact Physician Dr. Christine Simmons ELIGIBILITY: . Ewing’s sarcoma/peripheral neuroectodermal tumour or rhabdomyosarcoma in pelvic sites or pediatric type small round blue cell tumours in patients for whom alternating protocol is not appropriate where treatment includes pelvic radiotherapy . Patients with hematuria due to ifosfamide or cyclophosphamide . Good performance status . Adequate bone marrow, liver and kidney function TESTS: . Baseline and before each treatment: CBC and diff, platelets, creatinine, bilirubin, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, GGT, LDH . Urine dipstick for blood before each treatment and every 8 hours during treatment – if positive at any time, notify doctor and send urine sample for urinalysis and verification and accurate determination - refer to supportive care protocol SCMESNA (follow SCMESNA (SAVACM) preprinted order) . If clinically indicated: ECG PREMEDICATIONS: . Antiemetic protocol for highly emetogenic chemotherapy protocols (see SCNAUSEA) . LORazepam 1 mg SL every 4 to 6 hours as needed . prochlorperazine 10 mg PO every 4 to 6 hours as needed . nabilone 1 mg PO every 6 to 8 hours as needed TREATMENT: . Repeat every 3 weeks. SAVACM is not given during radiotherapy; omit DOXOrubicin and continue with vinCRIStine, cyclophosphamide and mesna. BC Cancer Protocol Summary SAVACM Page 1 of 3 Activated: N/A Revised: 1 Apr 2021 (prochlorperazine route) Warning: The information contained in these documents are a statement of consensus of BC Cancer professionals regarding their views of currently accepted approaches to treatment. Any clinician seeking to apply or consult these documents is expected to use independent medical judgement in the context of individual clinical circumstances to determine any patient's care or treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Vinorelbine Inj. USP
    VINORELBINE INJECTION USP survival between the 2 treatment groups. Survival (Figure 1) for patients receiving Vinorelbine Injection USP pIus cisplatin was Patients treated with Vinorelbine Injection USP should be frequently monitored for myelosuppression both during and after significantly better compared to the-patients who received single-agent cisplatin. The results of this trial are summarized in Table 1. therapy. Granulocytopenia is dose-limiting. Granulocyte nadirs occur between 7 and 10 days after dosing with granulocyte count PRESCRIBING INFORMATION Vinorelbine Injection USP plus Cisplatin versus Vindesine plus Cisplatin versus Single-Agent Vinorelbine Injection USP: In a recovery usually within the following 7 to 14 days. Complete blood counts with differentials should be performed and results large European clinical trial, 612 patients with Stage III or IV NSCLC, no prior chemotherapy, and WHO Performance Status of 0, 1, reviewed prior to administering each dose of Vinorelbine Injection USP. Vinorelbine Injection USP should not be administered to WARNING: Vinorelbine Injection USP should be administered under the supervision of a physician experienced in the use of or 2 were randomized to treatment with single-agent Vinorelbine Injection USP (30 mg/m2/week), Vinorelbine Injection USP (30 patients with granulocyte counts <1,000 cells/mm3. Patients developing severe granulocytopenia should be monitored carefully for cancer chemotherapeutic agents. This product is for intravenous (IV) use only. Intrathecal administration of other vinca alkaloids mg/m2/week) plus cisplatin (120 mg/m2 days 1 and 29, then every 6 weeks), and vindesine (3 mg/m2/week for 7 weeks, then every evidence of infection and/or fever. See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION for recommended dose adjustments for granulocytopenia.
    [Show full text]
  • DRUG NAME: Vinorelbine
    Vinorelbine DRUG NAME: Vinorelbine SYNONYM(S): Vinorelbine tartrate, VRL, VNL, NVB COMMON TRADE NAME(S): NAVELBINE® CLASSIFICATION: Mitotic inhibitor Special pediatric considerations are noted when applicable, otherwise adult provisions apply. MECHANISM OF ACTION: Vinorelbine is a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid derived from vinblastine. Vinca alkaloids such as vincristine and vinblastine are originally derived from periwinkle leaves (vinca rosea).1 Vinorelbine inhibits cell growth by binding to the tubulin of the mitotic microtubules.2 Like other mitotic inhibitors, vinorelbine also promotes apoptosis in cancer cells.1 In vitro vinorelbine shows both multidrug and non-multidrug resistance.2 Microtubules are present in mitotic spindles, neuronal axons, and other cells. Inhibition of mitotic microtubules appears to correlate with antitumour activity, while inhibition of axonal microtubules seems to correlate with neurotoxicity. Compared to vincristine and vinblastine, vinorelbine is more selective against mitotic than axonal microtubules in vitro, which may account for its decreased neurotoxicity.3 Vinorelbine is a radiation-sensitizing agent.4 It is cell cycle phase-specific (M phase).2 PHARMACOKINETICS: Interpatient variability moderate to large interpatient variability5,6 Distribution Widely distributed in the body, mostly in spleen, liver, kidneys, lungs, thymus; moderately in heart, muscles; minimally in fat, brain, bone marrow.3 High levels found in both normal and malignant lung tissue, with slow diffusion out of tumour tissue.1 cross
    [Show full text]
  • Combination Cancer Chemotherapy Regimens
    Guide to Combination Cancer Chemotherapy Regimens Dominic A. Solimando, Jr. J. Aubrey Waddell A Thomas Land Publication CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ...........................................................................ix INTRODUCTION ............................................................................xi REGIMENS 1. BREAST Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Fluorouracil (CAF, FAC). 1 Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil (CMF) .............................................4 Docetaxel and Capecitabine (DC) ...............................................................8 Docetaxel and Carboplatin (AUC = 6) (DC) ........................................................12 Docetaxel and Cisplatin (DP) ..................................................................16 Docetaxel, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide (TAC) ..............................................24 Dose Dense Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel .................................28 Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide ............................................................31 Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel ..........................................33 Doxorubicin and Docetaxel ...................................................................37 Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide (FEC50) (FEC) ........................................42 Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide (FEC100) (FEC) .......................................46 Gemcitabine and Capecitabine ................................................................49
    [Show full text]
  • Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) Agents – Unified Formulary
    bmchp.org | 888-566-0008 wellsense.org | 877-957-1300 Pharmacy Policy Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) Agents – Unified Formulary Policy Number: 9.709 Version Number: 2.0 Version Effective Date: 9/1/2021 Product Applicability All Plan+ Products Well Sense Health Plan Boston Medical Center HealthNet Plan New Hampshire Medicaid MassHealth- MCO MassHealth- ACO Qualified Health Plans/ConnectorCare/Employer Choice Direct Senior Care Options Note: Disclaimer and audit information is located at the end of this document. Prior Authorization Policy Reference Table: Drugs that require PA No PA Bosulif® (bosutinib) PD Gleevec® # (imatinib) Iclusig® (ponatinib) Sprycel® (dasatinib) Synribo® (omacetaxine mepesuccinate) Tasigna® (nilotinib) # This is a brand-name drug with FDA “A”-rated generic equivalents. Prior authorization is required for the brand, unless a particular form of that drug (for example, tablet, capsule, or liquid) does not have an FDA “A”-rated generic equivalent. PD Preferred Drug. In general, MassHealth requires a trial of the preferred drug or clinical rationale for prescribing a non-preferred drug within a therapeutic class. Please note, for CML agents, a trial with a preferred agent is not required prior to approval of a non-preferred agent. + Plan refers to Boston Medical Center Health Plan, Inc. and its affiliates and subsidiaries offering health coverage plans to enrolled members. The Plan operates in Massachusetts under the trade name Boston Medical Center HealthNet Plan and in other states under the trade name Well Sense Health Plan. Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) Agents 1 of 6 Procedure: Approval Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (Bosulif®, Iclusig® Synribo® (omacetaxine Diagnosis: mepesuccinate)) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Iclusig®) Approval Criteria: Prescriber provides documentation of ALL of the following: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Mechanisms of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Renata Zaj ˛aczkowska 1,* , Magdalena Kocot-K˛epska 2 , Wojciech Leppert 3 , Anna Wrzosek 1 , Joanna Mika 4 and Jerzy Wordliczek 1 1 Department of Interdisciplinary Intensive Care, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, 31-501 Krakow, Poland; [email protected] (A.W.); [email protected] (J.W.) 2 Department of Pain Research and Treatment, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, 31-501 Krakow, Poland; [email protected] 3 Chair and Department of Palliative Medicine Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznan, Poland; [email protected] 4 Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Department of Pain Pharmacology, 31-343 Krakow, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 January 2019; Accepted: 19 March 2019; Published: 22 March 2019 Abstract: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most frequent side effects caused by antineoplastic agents, with a prevalence from 19% to over 85%. Clinically, CIPN is a mostly sensory neuropathy that may be accompanied by motor and autonomic changes of varying intensity and duration. Due to its high prevalence among cancer patients, CIPN constitutes a major problem for both cancer patients and survivors as well as for their health care providers, especially because, at the moment, there is no single effective method of preventing CIPN; moreover, the possibilities of treating this syndrome are very limited. There are six main substance groups that cause damage to peripheral sensory, motor and autonomic neurons, which result in the development of CIPN: platinum-based antineoplastic agents, vinca alkaloids, epothilones (ixabepilone), taxanes, proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib) and immunomodulatory drugs (thalidomide).
    [Show full text]
  • Acronyms for Oncology Regimens
    ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS OF COMMONLY USED REGIMENS ACRONYM CHEMOTHERAPY COMBINATION 7 + 3 Anthracycline (daunorubicin/idarubicin) or anthracenedione (mitoxantrone)/cytarabine ABV Doxorubicin/ bleomycin/vincristine ABVD Doxorubicin/ bleomycin/vinblastine/dacarbazine AC Doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide ACE Doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/etoposide AI Doxorubicin/ifosfamide AIDA Tretinoin/idarubicin/dexamethasone/mitoxantrone/6-mercaptopurine/ methotrexate AP Doxorubicin/cisplatin AT Doxorubicin/docetaxel BEACOPP Bleomycin/etoposide/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/vincristine/procarbazine/ prednisone BEP Bleomycin/etoposide/cisplatin BMC Bleomycin/methotrexate/carmustine CAD Cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/dacarbazine CAP Cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/cisplatin CAPIRI Capecitabine/irinotecan CAPOX Capecitabine/oxaliplatin CAV Cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine CDE Cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/etoposide CDE-R Cyclophsopahmide/doxorubicin/etoposide/rituximab CECA Cyclophosphamide/etoposide/carboplatin/cytarabine CFAR Alemtuzumab/fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab CHOEP Cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/etoposide/prednisone CHOP Cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone CHOP-R Cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone/rtuximab ChlVPP Chlorambucil/vinblastine/procarbazine/prednisone CMF Cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-Fluorouracil CNOP Cyclophosphamide/mitoxantrone/vincristine/prednisone CODOX-M Cyclophsopahmide/vincristine/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/ leucovorin/intrathecal cytarabine/intrathecal methotrexate
    [Show full text]