Secretariat Distr.: Limited

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Secretariat Distr.: Limited UNITED NATIONS ST /SG/SER.C/L.623 _____________________________________________________________________________ Secretariat Distr.: Limited 31 December 2014 PROTOCOL AND LIAISON SERVICE LIST OF DELEGATIONS TO THE SIXTY-NINTH SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY I. MEMBER STATES Page Page Afghanistan......................................................................... 5 Chile ................................................................................. 45 Albania ............................................................................... 6 China ................................................................................ 47 Algeria ................................................................................ 7 Colombia .......................................................................... 48 Andorra ............................................................................... 8 Comoros ........................................................................... 49 Angola ................................................................................ 9 Congo ............................................................................... 50 Antigua and Barbuda ........................................................ 11 Costa Rica ........................................................................ 53 Argentina .......................................................................... 12 Côte d’Ivoire .................................................................... 54 Armenia ............................................................................ 13 Croatia .............................................................................. 56 Australia ........................................................................... 14 Cuba ................................................................................. 57 Austria .............................................................................. 15 Cyprus .............................................................................. 58 Azerbaijan......................................................................... 16 Czech Republic ................................................................ 59 Bahamas ........................................................................... 17 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea .......................... 60 Bahrain ............................................................................. 18 Democratic Republic of the Congo .................................. 61 Bangladesh ....................................................................... 19 Denmark ........................................................................... 63 Barbados ........................................................................... 23 Djibouti ............................................................................ 64 Belarus .............................................................................. 24 Dominica .......................................................................... 65 Belgium ............................................................................ 25 Dominican Republic ......................................................... 66 Belize ................................................................................ 26 Ecuador ............................................................................ 67 Benin ................................................................................ 27 Egypt ................................................................................ 68 Bhutan .............................................................................. 29 El Salvador ....................................................................... 69 Bolivia .............................................................................. 30 Equatorial Guinea ............................................................. 70 Bosnia and Herzegovina ................................................... 31 Eritrea ............................................................................... 72 Botswana .......................................................................... 32 Estonia .............................................................................. 73 Brazil ................................................................................ 33 Ethiopia ............................................................................ 74 Brunei Darussalam ........................................................... 34 Fiji .................................................................................... 75 Bulgaria ............................................................................ 35 Finland ............................................................................. 76 Burkina Faso ..................................................................... 36 France ............................................................................... 79 Burundi ............................................................................. 38 Gabon ............................................................................... 80 Cabo Verde ....................................................................... 39 Gambia ............................................................................. 81 Cambodia .......................................................................... 40 Georgia ............................................................................. 82 Cameroon ......................................................................... 41 Germany ........................................................................... 83 Canada .............................................................................. 42 Ghana ............................................................................... 87 Central African Republic .................................................. 43 Greece .............................................................................. 89 Chad.................................................................................. 44 Grenada ............................................................................ 90 Page Page Guatemala ......................................................................... 91 Paraguay ......................................................................... 170 Guinea .............................................................................. 93 Peru ................................................................................ 171 Guinea-Bissau ................................................................... 94 Philippines ...................................................................... 172 Guyana .............................................................................. 95 Poland ............................................................................ 174 Haiti .................................................................................. 96 Portugal .......................................................................... 176 Honduras .......................................................................... 97 Qatar ............................................................................... 177 Hungary ............................................................................ 98 Republic of Korea .......................................................... 179 Iceland .............................................................................. 99 Republic of Moldova ...................................................... 181 India ................................................................................ 100 Romania ......................................................................... 182 Indonesia ........................................................................ 101 Russian Federation ......................................................... 183 Iran (Islamic Republic of) ............................................... 102 Rwanda .......................................................................... 188 Iraq ................................................................................. 103 Saint Kitts and Nevis ...................................................... 189 Ireland ............................................................................. 105 Saint Lucia ..................................................................... 190 Israel ............................................................................... 106 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines .................................. 191 Italy ................................................................................. 108 Samoa ............................................................................. 192 Jamaica ........................................................................... 110 San Marino ..................................................................... 193 Japan ............................................................................... 111 Sao Tome and Principe .................................................. 194 Jordan ............................................................................. 114 Saudi Arabia ................................................................... 195 Kazakhstan ..................................................................... 115 Senegal ........................................................................... 197 Kenya.............................................................................. 116
Recommended publications
  • Råstoffer Og Rigsfællesskabets Fremtid - En Analyse Af Debatten I Grønland Og Danmark
    KØBENHAVNS UNIVERSITET INSTITUT FOR STATSKUNDSKAB Kandidatspeciale Nina Katrine Lave & Anders Busck Holgersen Råstoffer og rigsfællesskabets fremtid - En analyse af debatten i Grønland og Danmark Vejleder: Ulrik Pram Gad Afleveret den: 12/02/14 Antal ord: 41.965 Nina Katrine Lave og Anders Busck Holgersen Institut for Statskundskab, KU Abstract The Danish Realm is the word for the relationship between the Danish state and its two overseas regions, the Faroe Island and Greenland. Greenland gained greater autonomy within the Danish Realm in 2009 through the Greenland Self-Rule Act, which established the Greenlanders as a separate national people under international law. The consequence of the Self-Rule Act was that Greenland became in charge of the policy of raw materials which had previously been under Danish authority. The goal of this thesis is to analyze the following: What are the consequences of the political debate on raw materials in Denmark and Greenland for the future of the Danish Realm? First we analyzed the Danish and Greenlandic debate through the Copenhagen School’s theory of securitization. On the basis of this analysis we made four scenarios for the future of the Danish Realm. Overall, we conclude that the political debate in Denmark and Greenland on raw materials can have the following consequences for the Danish Realm: The first conclusion is that the effect of the political debate is that foreign investors might think that investing in the Greenlandic mining industry is too risky. Without foreign investment, Greenland will not become financially independent from Denmark and will therefore remain a part of the Danish Realm.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Deal – the Coordinators
    Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • Local Benefits of Europe
    Local Benefits of Europe 1 European Green Party Rue Wiertz 31, 1050 Brussels – Belgium [email protected] Funded by the European Parliament. Sole liability remains with the author. Printed in Brussels, Belgium on recycled paper Designed by Mijuro © 2018 DEAR FRIENDS European politics have a signifi cant Evelyne Huytebroeck influence on the lives of people at the (Member of the EGP Committee) local level. In many EU Member States, the local elections are held simulta- neously with the European elections providing a huge opportunity to link the two election campaigns. Against this background, we would like to provide you with some practical background material and answer your questions on how European decisions in various policy areas influence your municipality by means of this booklet ‘Local Benefi ts of Europe’. This booklet is based on a work that was done by the German Greens lead by Anna Cavazzini and Reinhard Bütikofer. The information can also help you prepare for your local election programmes or campaigns. We place particular emphasis on how the people in your community benefi t practically from Europe, ranging from (Secretary General EGP) environmental protection to structural Mar Garcia policy, and what the Greens in Europe have achieved for European communi- ties. If you need more information on a spe- cifi c topic - no problem: in each chapter, you will fi nd a contact person who has contributed to this handbook and can answer your questions. We hope that this handbook will help you to prepare for the upcoming Euro- pean and local elections. Best regards 1. How do cities and municipalities benefi t from Europe? 5 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • SASEC Events SASEC Calendar
    SASEC Events SASEC Calendar Fifth SASEC Customs Subgroup Meeting 25-26 May 2016: Male, the Maldives The Fifth SASEC Customs Subgroup (SCS) Meeting noted considerable progress in subregional and national projects included in the SCS Work Plan 2014-2016, including successful exchange of documents between Customs administrations at selected border-crossing points and completion of an assessment study on containerized movement of cargo in the • Indian Trade Portal SASEC subregion. The two-day Meeting also included a learning Upcoming • Bangladesh Trade Portal event on the development of trade information portals. SASEC Events Read More >> India Second National Workshop on Second Regional Consultation Workshop on SASEC 2025 Customs Valuation 10-11 May 2016: New Delhi, India 6-9 June 2016 New Delhi, India This Workshop discussed key elements of the proposed SASEC 2025 vision document, the overarching basis for SASEC 2025, SASEC ASYCUDA which lays out a road map to achieve the fundamental SASEC Subregional Network goal of increasing trade and economic cooperation within South Meeting 8-9 June 2016 Asia. SASEC delegations provided inputs on the draft vision Kathmandu, Nepal document and reviewed the revised SASEC 2025 Operational • India MoF Plan. Nepal SPS and TBT • SASEC Event Read More >> National Consultation 13 June 2016 Kathmandu, Nepal Bhutan DRC: Second National Workshop on Customs Valuation 9-13 May 2016: Phuentsholing, Bhutan The Second National Workshop finalized the standard operating Get the latest news and procedure (SOP) for Customs valuation control in line with the information on SASEC new Customs Act of Bhutan, and supported project core countries on all mobile members of Bhutan Department of Revenue and Customs devices.
    [Show full text]
  • 99. Møde Cityringen Til Nordhavnen)
    Tirsdag den 21. maj 2013 (D) 1 6) 3. behandling af lovforslag nr. L 155: Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om en Cityring og lov om Metro- selskabet I/S og Udviklingsselskabet By & Havn I/S. (Afgrening fra 99. møde Cityringen til Nordhavnen). Tirsdag den 21. maj 2013 kl. 13.00 Af transportministeren (Henrik Dam Kristensen). (Fremsættelse 27.02.2013. (Omtrykt). 1. behandling 12.03.2013. Be- tænkning 02.05.2013. 2. behandling 14.05.2013. Lovforslaget op- Dagsorden trykt efter 2. behandling). 1) Spørgsmål om fremme af forespørgsel nr. F 44: 7) 3. behandling af lovforslag nr. L 156: Forespørgsel til skatteministeren om Camilla Vest-sagen. (Haste- Forslag til lov om elektrificering af jernbanen. forespørgsel). Af transportministeren (Henrik Dam Kristensen). Af Claus Hjort Frederiksen (V), Kristian Thulesen Dahl (DF), Ole (Fremsættelse 27.02.2013. 1. behandling 12.03.2013. Betænkning Birk Olesen (LA) og Brian Mikkelsen (KF). 02.05.2013. 2. behandling 14.05.2013). (Anmeldelse 16.05.2013). 8) 3. behandling af lovforslag nr. L 126: 2) Spørgsmål om fremme af forespørgsel nr. F 45: Forslag til lov om ændring af revisorloven og lov om finansiel virk- Forespørgsel til handels- og investeringsministeren om en forstærket somhed. (Revisorers uddannelse og certificering af revisorer i finan- dansk indsats på det internationale handelspolitiske område. sielle virksomheder m.v.). Af Steen Gade (SF), Jakob Ellemann-Jensen (V), Jens Joel (S), Lone Af erhvervs- og vækstministeren (Annette Vilhelmsen). Loklindt (RV) og Lene Espersen (KF). (Fremsættelse 30.01.2013. 1. behandling 05.02.2013. Betænkning (Anmeldelse 16.05.2013). 02.05.2013.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Copenhagen FACULTY of SOCIAL SCIENCES Faculty of Social Sciences UNIVERSITY of COPENHAGEN · DENMARK PHD DISSERTATION 2019 · ISBN 978-87-7209-312-3
    Arctic identity interactions Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies Jacobsen, Marc Publication date: 2019 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Jacobsen, M. (2019). Arctic identity interactions: Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies. Download date: 11. okt.. 2021 DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE university of copenhagen FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES faculty of social sciences UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN · DENMARK PHD DISSERTATION 2019 · ISBN 978-87-7209-312-3 MARC JACOBSEN Arctic identity interactions Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies and Denmark’s Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s identity interactions Arctic Arctic identity interactions Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies PhD Dissertation 2019 Marc Jacobsen DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE university of copenhagen FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES faculty of social sciences UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN · DENMARK PHD DISSERTATION 2019 · ISBN 978-87-7209-312-3 MARC JACOBSEN Arctic identity interactions Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies and Denmark’s Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s identity interactions Arctic Arctic identity interactions Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies PhD Dissertation 2019 Marc Jacobsen Arctic identity interactions Reconfiguring dependency in Greenland’s and Denmark’s foreign policies Marc Jacobsen PhD Dissertation Department of Political Science University of Copenhagen September 2019 Main supervisor: Professor Ole Wæver, University of Copenhagen. Co-supervisor: Associate Professor Ulrik Pram Gad, Aalborg University.
    [Show full text]
  • CREATING OPPORTUNITIES, GROWING VALUE Creating Opportunities, Growing Value
    CREATING OPPORTUNITIES, GROWING VALUE Creating Opportunities, Growing Value The cover for our Integrated Annual Report reflects the focus that we place on our key roles and purpose in the Malaysian capital market. The deliberately minimalistic approach allows our mission statement to stand out from any distractions, while the figurative bull and bear reflect the symbols long associated with the stock market. Overall, the cover reflects our continuing value creation efforts regardless of the market conditions. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ABOUT POSITIONED FOR THIS REPORT VALUE CREATION 2 Continuing Our Integrated Reporting Journey 5 Who We Are 2 Scope and Boundaries 7 Our Performance 2 Material Matters 8 Our Value Creation Model 2 Reporting Principles and Framework 12 Overall Market Performance 2 Navigation Icons 14 Market Highlights 3 Forward-Looking Statement and Disclaimer 16 Corporate Events and News 3 Board of Directors’ Approval 20 Peer Comparison 22 Upcoming Financial Calendar Events SECTION SECTION OUR GOVERNANCE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 81 Who Governs Us 129 List of Properties Owned by Bursa Malaysia Group 92 Who Leads Us 130 Statistics of Shareholdings 94 Key Senior Management 143 Additional Compliance Information Disclosures 95 Corporate Structure 96 Other Corporate Information 97 Corporate Governance Overview 107 Marketplace Report: Fair and Orderly Markets 114 Statement on Internal Control and Risk Management 123 Audit Committee Report VISION MISSION To be ASEAN’s leading, Creating Opportunities, sustainable and Growing Value globally-connected
    [Show full text]
  • University of Copenhagen Njalsgade 80, 2300 Copenhagen East Denmark [email protected]
    For borgeren, tilskueren eller den indviede? En praksisorienteret retorisk kritik af avisens politiske kommentarer Bengtsson, Mette Publication date: 2014 Document version Tidlig version også kaldet pre-print Citation for published version (APA): Bengtsson, M. (2014). For borgeren, tilskueren eller den indviede? En praksisorienteret retorisk kritik af avisens politiske kommentarer. Det Humanistiske Fakultet, Københavns Universitet. Download date: 08. apr.. 2020 For borgeren, tilskueren eller den indviede? En praksisorienteret retorisk kritik af avisens politiske kommentarer Ph.d.-afhandling Mette Bengtsson Tegning: Claus Bigum Afdeling for Retorik Humanistiske Fakultet Københavns Universitet Afleveret august 2014 2 “Deliberative rhetoric makes people think, it makes people see things in new ways, it conveys information and knowledge, and it makes people more reflective (...) Deliberative rhetoric creates a dynamic relationship between speaker and hearer. Hearers must be engaged by the speech. It ought to spark active reasoning and thoughtfulness rather than unreflective triggers or gut reactions.” (Chambers 2009, s. 335) 3 Forord.................................................................................................................... 7 1. Indledning.......................................................................................................... 9 Hvad er en politisk kommentator?...........................................................................................................10 Genrens udvikling og udbredelse.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0271/2021 12.5.2021 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy pursuant to Rule 132(2) of the Rules of Procedure on Chinese countersanctions on EU entities and MEPs and MPs (2021/2644(RSP)) Reinhard Bütikofer, Markéta Gregorová, Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel, Sara Matthieu, Francisco Guerreiro, Alice Kuhnke, Bas Eickhout, Pär Holmgren, Jakop G. Dalunde, Anna Cavazzini, Yannick Jadot, Saskia Bricmont on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group RE\1231430EN.docx PE692.538v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0271/2021 European Parliament resolution on Chinese countersanctions on EU entities and MEPs and MPs (2021/2644(RSP)) The European Parliament, – having regard to its previous resolutions and reports on the situation in China and EU- China relations, in particular those of 21 January 2021 on the crackdown on the democratic opposition in Hong Kong1 and of 17 December 2020 on forced labour and the situation of the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region2 (XUAR), – having regard to its previous recommendations relating to Hong Kong, in particular that of 13 December 2017 to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (VP/HR) on Hong Kong, 20 years after handover3, – having regard to the statement by leading MEPs following the decision by Chinese authorities to sanction
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • University Law College University of the Punjab, Lahore
    1 University Law College University of the Punjab, Lahore. Result of Entry Test of LL.B 03 Years Morning/Afternoon Program Session (2018-2019) (Annual System) held on 12-08-2018* Total Marks: 80 Roll No. Name of Candidate Father's Name Marks 1 Nusrat Mushtaq Mushtaq Ahmed 16 2 Usman Waqas Mohammad Raouf 44 3 Ali Hassan Fayyaz Akhtar 25 4 Muneeb Ahmad Saeed Ahmad 44 5 Sajid Ali Muhammad Aslam 30 6 Muhammad Iqbal Irshad Hussain 23 7 Ameen Babar Abid Hussain Babar Absent 8 Mohsin Jamil Muhammad Jamil 24 9 Syeda Dur e Najaf Bukhari Muhammad Noor ul Ain Bukhari Absent 10 Ihtisham Haider Haji Muhammad Afzal 20 11 Muhammad Nazim Saeed Ahmad 30 12 Muhammad Wajid Abdul Waheed 22 13 Ashiq Hussain Ghulam Hussain 14 14 Abdullah Muzafar Ali 35 15 Naoman Khan Muhammad Ramzan 33 16 Abdullah Masaud Masaud Ahmad Yazdani 30 17 Muhammad Hashim Nadeem Mirza Nadeem Akhtar 39 18 Muhammad Afzaal Muhammad Arshad 13 19 Muhammad Hamza Tahir Nazeer Absent 20 Abdul Ghaffar Muhammad Majeed 19 21 Adeel Jan Ashfaq Muhammad Ashfaq 24 22 Rashid Bashir Bashir Ahmad 35 23 Touseef Akhtar Khursheed Muhammad Akhtar 42 24 Usama Nisar Nisar Ahmad 17 25 Haider Ali Zulfiqar Ali 26 26 Zeeshan Ahmed Sultan Ahmed 28 27 Hafiz Muhammad Asim Muhammad Hanif 32 28 Fatima Maqsood Maqsood Ahmad 12 29 Abdul Waheed Haji Musa Khan 16 30 Simran Shakeel Ahmad 28 31 Muhammad Sami Ullah Muhammad Shoaib 35 32 Muhammad Sajjad Shoukat Ali 27 33 Muhammad Usman Iqbal Allah Ditta Urf M. Iqbal 27 34 Noreen Shahzadi Muhammad Ramzan 19 35 Salman Younas Muhammad Younas Malik 25 36 Zain Ul Abidin Muhammad Aslam 21 37 Muhammad Zaigham Faheem Muhammad Arif 32 38 Shahid Ali Asghar Ali 37 39 Abu Bakar Jameel M.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) Scandal: Exploring Malaysia's 2018 General Elections and the Case for Sovereign Wealth Funds
    Seattle Pacific University Digital Commons @ SPU Honors Projects University Scholars Spring 6-7-2021 The 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) Scandal: Exploring Malaysia's 2018 General Elections and the Case for Sovereign Wealth Funds Chea-Mun Tan Seattle Pacific University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.spu.edu/honorsprojects Part of the Economics Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Tan, Chea-Mun, "The 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) Scandal: Exploring Malaysia's 2018 General Elections and the Case for Sovereign Wealth Funds" (2021). Honors Projects. 131. https://digitalcommons.spu.edu/honorsprojects/131 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by the University Scholars at Digital Commons @ SPU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ SPU. The 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) Scandal: Exploring Malaysia’s 2018 General Elections and the Case for Sovereign Wealth Funds by Chea-Mun Tan First Reader, Dr. Doug Downing Second Reader, Dr. Hau Nguyen A project submitted in partial fulfillMent of the requireMents of the University Scholars Honors Project Seattle Pacific University 2021 Tan 2 Abstract In 2015, the former PriMe Minister of Malaysia, Najib Razak, was accused of corruption, eMbezzleMent, and fraud of over $700 million USD. Low Taek Jho, the former financier of Malaysia, was also accused and dubbed the ‘mastermind’ of the 1MDB scandal. As one of the world’s largest financial scandals, this paper seeks to explore the political and economic iMplications of 1MDB through historical context and a critical assessMent of governance. Specifically, it will exaMine the economic and political agendas of former PriMe Ministers Najib Razak and Mahathir MohaMad.
    [Show full text]