DOCSLIB.ORG

Generation of Radio Frequency Induced Metastable Xenon As a Gain Medium for Diode Pumped Rare Gas Laser Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Generation of Radio Frequency Induced Metastable Xenon As a Gain Medium for Diode Pumped Rare Gas Laser Systems GENERATION OF RADIO FREQUENCY INDUCED METASTABLE XENON AS A GAIN MEDIUM FOR DIODE PUMPED RARE GAS LASER SYSTEMS by JACQUELINE MARIE ANDREOZZI A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Electrical Engineering to The School of Graduate Studies of The University of Alabama in Huntsville HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The research presented in this thesis would not have been possible without the substantial guidance, effort and assistance of several people. I would first like to thank my adviser, Dr. John Williams, for his willingness and enthusiasm to take on this project. His expertise and knowledge were undoubtedly a major factor in the success of the project. I would also like to thank the members of my committee, Dr. Richard Fork and Dr. Lingze Duan, for their respected input and advice regarding this research. I would also like to thank Mrs. Amanda Clark, Dr. Greg Finney and Mr. Keff Edwards for their continuous support and intellectual contributions as the project progressed. The experience and ideas of these three individuals largely impacted the final experimental design, and proved invaluable for the success of the research. Finally, it is essential that I acknowledge the generous funding given to this project by the U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command. The assistance and technical advice of Dr. Kip Kendrick and Mr. Adam Aberle at this organization was crucial to the success of this research. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES ………………………………………………………………………………………....…………….……….……. ix LIST OF TABLES …………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……….…… xii Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION TO GAS LASER SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 1 1.1: Interest in High Energy Lasers ............................................................................................ 3 1.2: The Evolution of Legacy Systems ........................................................................................ 5 1.3: Diode Pumped Alkali Lasers................................................................................................ 8 1.4: Diode Pumped Rare Gas Lasers ........................................................................................ 15 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ................................................................................................... 20 2.1: Atomic Properties of Interest and Notation ..................................................................... 21 2.1.1: Absorption and Fluorescence ....................................................................................... 26 2.1.2 Atomic Laser Model ...................................................................................................... 31 2.1.3: Lifetimes ....................................................................................................................... 36 2.1.4: Efficiencies .................................................................................................................... 38 2.2: Alkali Atoms ...................................................................................................................... 42 2.3: Cesium .............................................................................................................................. 44 2.4: Rare Gas Atoms ................................................................................................................ 49 vi 2.5: Xenon ................................................................................................................................ 51 2.5.1: Hyperfine Structure of the Xenon Transition .............................. 59 2.5.2: Hyperfine Structure of the Xenon Transition .............................. 66 2.7: Optical Pumping ............................................................................................................... 72 2.8: Previous Studies ................................................................................................................ 77 3 CESIUM EXPERIMENT AND CALIBRATION ............................................................................... 80 3.1: Experiment Equipment and Setup .................................................................................... 80 3.1.1: Tunable Diode Laser ..................................................................................................... 83 3.1.2: Absorption Detector ..................................................................................................... 83 3.1.3: Fabry-Perot Interferometer .......................................................................................... 84 3.1.4: Cesium Reference Cell .................................................................................................. 87 3.2: Experiment Results and Data Analysis ............................................................................. 87 3.2.1: Temperature Dependence of Absorption Strength ...................................................... 89 3.2.2: Hyperfine Splitting of the Cesium D1 Line .................................................................... 92 4 DESIGN OF XENON EXPERIMENT........................................................................................... 101 4.1: Gas Flow and Pressure Control ....................................................................................... 102 4.2: Rare Gas Test Cell ........................................................................................................... 107 4.3: Radio Frequency Capacitive Discharge ........................................................................... 113 4.4: Tunable Diode Laser and Optics ..................................................................................... 115 4.5: Computer Interface ........................................................................................................ 117 vii 5 ABSORPTION MEASUREMENTS AND CALCULATIONS ........................................................... 119 5.1: First Glow of Xenon and Plasma Characterization ......................................................... 121 5.2: Absorption Spectra of Metastable Xenon Cell ................................................................ 128 5.3: Xenon Absorption Profile Analysis .................................................................................. 134 5.3.1: The Measured Absorption Profile of the Xenon Transition ...... 135 5.3.2: The Measured Absorption Profile of the Xenon Transition ...... 140 5.4: Principles that Affect the Observed Absorption Profiles and Causes of Error ................ 145 5.4.1: Natural Linewidth Broadening ................................................................................... 145 5.4.2: Pressure Broadening .................................................................................................. 147 5.4.3: Doppler Broadening ................................................................................................... 149 5.4.4: Isotope Broadening .................................................................................................... 152 6 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH ............................................................................... 156 6.1: Experiment Conclusions .................................................................................................. 156 6.2: Future Research .............................................................................................................. 159 6.2.1: Measurements at Atmospheric Pressure ................................................................... 160 6.2.2: Comparison to Cesium DPAL Cell ............................................................................... 160 6.3.3: Rare Gas Laser Cavity ................................................................................................. 161 7 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................... 162 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1.1: Theoretical lasing process of Diode Pumped Rare Gas Lasers (DPRGLs). ............................ 16 2.1: Simplified illustration of the electron configuration of xenon, organized into each n level. By formula: .............................................. 23 2.2: An illustration of how gain is achieved through population inversion. ............................... 32 2.3: A general phase diagram illustrating the difference between a vapor and a gas. .............. 43 2.4: Simplified electron configuration illustration of cesium. ..................................................... 44 2.5: Hyperfine splitting of the energy levels of cesium (not drawn to scale). Frequency values taken from Steck. [28].................................................................................................................... 47 2.6: Hyperfine structure of 129Xe around the 904.8 nm absorption line. .................................... 62 2.7: Hyperfine structure of 131Xe around the 904.8 nm absorption line. .................................... 65 2.8: Hyperfine structure of 129Xe around the 882.2 nm absorption line. .................................... 69 2.9: Hyperfine structure of 131Xe around the 882.2 nm absorption line. .................................... 71 2.10: General three-level atomic laser scheme, using indirect pumping. .................................... 73 2.11: A possible pump and lasing scheme
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unit 1 Old Quantum Theory
    UNIT 1 OLD QUANTUM THEORY Structure Introduction Objectives li;,:overy of Sub-atomic Particles Earlier Atom Models Light as clectromagnetic Wave Failures of Classical Physics Black Body Radiation '1 Heat Capacity Variation Photoelectric Effect Atomic Spectra Planck's Quantum Theory, Black Body ~diation. and Heat Capacity Variation Einstein's Theory of Photoelectric Effect Bohr Atom Model Calculation of Radius of Orbits Energy of an Electron in an Orbit Atomic Spectra and Bohr's Theory Critical Analysis of Bohr's Theory Refinements in the Atomic Spectra The61-y Summary Terminal Questions Answers 1.1 INTRODUCTION The ideas of classical mechanics developed by Galileo, Kepler and Newton, when applied to atomic and molecular systems were found to be inadequate. Need was felt for a theory to describe, correlate and predict the behaviour of the sub-atomic particles. The quantum theory, proposed by Max Planck and applied by Einstein and Bohr to explain different aspects of behaviour of matter, is an important milestone in the formulation of the modern concept of atom. In this unit, we will study how black body radiation, heat capacity variation, photoelectric effect and atomic spectra of hydrogen can be explained on the basis of theories proposed by Max Planck, Einstein and Bohr. They based their theories on the postulate that all interactions between matter and radiation occur in terms of definite packets of energy, known as quanta. Their ideas, when extended further, led to the evolution of wave mechanics, which shows the dual nature of matter
    [Show full text]
  • From Theory to the First Working Laser Laser History—Part I
    I feature_ laser history From theory to the first working laser Laser history—Part I Author_Ingmar Ingenegeren, Germany _The principle of both maser (microwave am- 19 US patents) using a ruby laser. Both were nom- plification by stimulated emission of radiation) inated for the Nobel Prize. Gábor received the 1971 and laser (light amplification by stimulated emis- Nobel Prize in Physics for the invention and devel- sion of radiation) were first described in 1917 by opment of the holographic method. To a friend he Albert Einstein (Fig.1) in “Zur Quantentheorie der wrote that he was ashamed to get this prize for Strahlung”, as the so called ‘stimulated emission’, such a simple invention. He was the owner of more based on Niels Bohr’s quantum theory, postulated than a hundred patents. in 1913, which explains the actions of electrons in- side atoms. Einstein (born in Germany, 14 March In 1954 at the Columbia University in New York, 1879–18 April 1955) received the Nobel Prize for Charles Townes (born in the USA, 28 July 1915–to- physics in 1921, and Bohr (born in Denmark, 7 Oc- day, Fig. 2) and Arthur Schawlow (born in the USA, tober 1885–18 November 1962) in 1922. 5 Mai 1921–28 April 1999, Fig. 3) invented the maser, using ammonia gas and microwaves which In 1947 Dennis Gábor (born in Hungarian, 5 led to the granting of a patent on March 24, 1959. June 1900–8 February 1972) developed the theory The maser was used to amplify radio signals and as of holography, which requires laser light for its re- an ultra sensitive detector for space research.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics in One Dimension
    Solved Problems on Quantum Mechanics in One Dimension Charles Asman, Adam Monahan and Malcolm McMillan Department of Physics and Astronomy University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Fall 1999; revised 2011 by Malcolm McMillan Given here are solutions to 15 problems on Quantum Mechanics in one dimension. The solutions were used as a learning-tool for students in the introductory undergraduate course Physics 200 Relativity and Quanta given by Malcolm McMillan at UBC during the 1998 and 1999 Winter Sessions. The solutions were prepared in collaboration with Charles Asman and Adam Monaham who were graduate students in the Department of Physics at the time. The problems are from Chapter 5 Quantum Mechanics in One Dimension of the course text Modern Physics by Raymond A. Serway, Clement J. Moses and Curt A. Moyer, Saunders College Publishing, 2nd ed., (1997). Planck's Constant and the Speed of Light. When solving numerical problems in Quantum Mechanics it is useful to note that the product of Planck's constant h = 6:6261 × 10−34 J s (1) and the speed of light c = 2:9979 × 108 m s−1 (2) is hc = 1239:8 eV nm = 1239:8 keV pm = 1239:8 MeV fm (3) where eV = 1:6022 × 10−19 J (4) Also, ~c = 197:32 eV nm = 197:32 keV pm = 197:32 MeV fm (5) where ~ = h=2π. Wave Function for a Free Particle Problem 5.3, page 224 A free electron has wave function Ψ(x; t) = sin(kx − !t) (6) •Determine the electron's de Broglie wavelength, momentum, kinetic energy and speed when k = 50 nm−1.
    [Show full text]
  • Class 2: Operators, Stationary States
    Class 2: Operators, stationary states Operators In quantum mechanics much use is made of the concept of operators. The operator associated with position is the position vector r. As shown earlier the momentum operator is −iℏ ∇ . The operators operate on the wave function. The kinetic energy operator, T, is related to the momentum operator in the same way that kinetic energy and momentum are related in classical physics: p⋅ p (−iℏ ∇⋅−) ( i ℏ ∇ ) −ℏ2 ∇ 2 T = = = . (2.1) 2m 2 m 2 m The potential energy operator is V(r). In many classical systems, the Hamiltonian of the system is equal to the mechanical energy of the system. In the quantum analog of such systems, the mechanical energy operator is called the Hamiltonian operator, H, and for a single particle ℏ2 HTV= + =− ∇+2 V . (2.2) 2m The Schrödinger equation is then compactly written as ∂Ψ iℏ = H Ψ , (2.3) ∂t and has the formal solution iHt Ψ()r,t = exp − Ψ () r ,0. (2.4) ℏ Note that the order of performing operations is important. For example, consider the operators p⋅ r and r⋅ p . Applying the first to a wave function, we have (pr⋅) Ψ=−∇⋅iℏ( r Ψ=−) i ℏ( ∇⋅ rr) Ψ− i ℏ( ⋅∇Ψ=−) 3 i ℏ Ψ+( rp ⋅) Ψ (2.5) We see that the operators are not the same. Because the result depends on the order of performing the operations, the operator r and p are said to not commute. In general, the expectation value of an operator Q is Q=∫ Ψ∗ (r, tQ) Ψ ( r , td) 3 r .
    [Show full text]
  • On a Classical Limit for Electronic Degrees of Freedom That Satisfies the Pauli Exclusion Principle
    On a classical limit for electronic degrees of freedom that satisfies the Pauli exclusion principle R. D. Levine* The Fritz Haber Research Center for Molecular Dynamics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel; and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 Contributed by R. D. Levine, December 10, 1999 Fermions need to satisfy the Pauli exclusion principle: no two can taken into account, this starting point is not necessarily a be in the same state. This restriction is most compactly expressed limitation. There are at least as many orbitals (or, strictly in a second quantization formalism by the requirement that the speaking, spin orbitals) as there are electrons, but there can creation and annihilation operators of the electrons satisfy anti- easily be more orbitals than electrons. There are usually more commutation relations. The usual classical limit of quantum me- states than orbitals, and in the model of quantum dots that chanics corresponds to creation and annihilation operators that motivated this work, the number of spin orbitals is twice the satisfy commutation relations, as for a harmonic oscillator. We number of sites. For the example of 19 sites, there are 38 discuss a simple classical limit for Fermions. This limit is shown to spin-orbitals vs. 2,821,056,160 doublet states. correspond to an anharmonic oscillator, with just one bound The point of the formalism is that it ensures that the Pauli excited state. The vibrational quantum number of this anharmonic exclusion principle is satisfied, namely that no more than one oscillator, which is therefore limited to the range 0 to 1, is the electron occupies any given spin-orbital.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights APS March Meeting Heads North to Montréal
    December 2003 Volume 12, No. 11 NEWS http://www.physics2005.org A Publication of The American Physical Society http://www.aps.org/apsnews APS March Meeting Heads North to Montréal California Physics Departments Face More The 2004 March Meeting will Physics; International Physics; Edu- be organizing a host of special For those who want to Budget Cuts in an be held in lively and cosmopolitan cation and Physics; and Graduate events, including receptions, explore, there will be tours of Uncertain Future Montréal, Canada’s second largest Student Affairs, as well as topical alumni reunions, a students’ Montréal, highlighting the city’s city. The meeting runs from March groups on Instrument and Mea- lunch with the experts, and an history, cultural heritage, cosmo- The California recall election 22nd through the 26th at the surement Science; Magnetism and opportunity to meet the editors politan nature, and European was a laughing matter to many, Palais des Congrès de Montréal. Its Applications; Shock Compres- of the APS and AIP journals. flavor. a veritable circus of replace- Approximately 5,500 papers sion of Condensed Matter; and ment candidates of dubious will be presented in more than 90 Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. celebrity and questionable invited sessions and 550 contrib- An exhibit show will round out APS Honors Two Undergrads qualifications for the job. But for uted sessions in a wide variety of the program during which attend- physics departments across the categories, including condensed ees can visit vendors who will be With Apker Award state, the ongoing budget woes matter, materials, polymer physics, displaying the latest products, that spurred angry voters to chemical physics, biological phys- instruments and equipment, and Peter Onyisi of the University action in the first place remain ics, fluid dynamics, laser science, software, as well as scientific pub- of Chicago received the award deadly serious.
    [Show full text]
  • Wave Mechanics (PDF)
    WAVE MECHANICS B. Zwiebach September 13, 2013 Contents 1 The Schr¨odinger equation 1 2 Stationary Solutions 4 3 Properties of energy eigenstates in one dimension 10 4 The nature of the spectrum 12 5 Variational Principle 18 6 Position and momentum 22 1 The Schr¨odinger equation In classical mechanics the motion of a particle is usually described using the time-dependent position ix(t) as the dynamical variable. In wave mechanics the dynamical variable is a wave- function. This wavefunction depends on position and on time and it is a complex number – it belongs to the complex numbers C (we denote the real numbers by R). When all three dimensions of space are relevant we write the wavefunction as Ψ(ix, t) C . (1.1) ∈ When only one spatial dimension is relevant we write it as Ψ(x, t) C. The wavefunction ∈ satisfies the Schr¨odinger equation. For one-dimensional space we write ∂Ψ 2 ∂2 i (x, t) = + V (x, t) Ψ(x, t) . (1.2) ∂t −2m ∂x2 This is the equation for a (non-relativistic) particle of mass m moving along the x axis while acted by the potential V (x, t) R. It is clear from this equation that the wavefunction must ∈ be complex: if it were real, the right-hand side of (1.2) would be real while the left-hand side would be imaginary, due to the explicit factor of i. Let us make two important remarks: 1 1. The Schr¨odinger equation is a first order differential equation in time. This means that if we prescribe the wavefunction Ψ(x, t0) for all of space at an arbitrary initial time t0, the wavefunction is determined for all times.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of the Sole Inventor
    Michigan Law Review Volume 110 Issue 5 2012 The Myth of the Sole Inventor Mark A. Lemley Stanford Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Mark A. Lemley, The Myth of the Sole Inventor, 110 MICH. L. REV. 709 (2012). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol110/iss5/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MYTH OF THE SOLE INVENTORt Mark A. Lemley* The theory of patent law is based on the idea that a lone genius can solve problems that stump the experts, and that the lone genius will do so only if properly incented. But the canonical story of the lone genius inventor is largely a myth. Surveys of hundreds of significant new technologies show that almost all of them are invented simultaneously or nearly simultaneous- ly by two or more teams working independently of each other. Invention appears in significant part to be a social, not an individual, phenomenon. The result is a real problem for classic theories of patent law. Our domi- nant theory of patent law doesn't seem to explain the way we actually implement that law. Maybe the problem is not with our current patent law, but with our current patent theory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Time Evolution of a Wave Function
    The Time Evolution of a Wave Function ² A \system" refers to an electron in a potential energy well, e.g., an electron in a one-dimensional in¯nite square well. The system is speci¯ed by a given Hamiltonian. ² Assume all systems are isolated. ² Assume all systems have a time-independent Hamiltonian operator H^ . ² TISE and TDSE are abbreviations for the time-independent SchrÄodingerequation and the time- dependent SchrÄodingerequation, respectively. P ² The symbol in all questions denotes a sum over a complete set of states. PART A ² Information for questions (I)-(VI) In the following questions, an electron is in a one-dimensional in¯nite square well of width L. (The q 2 n2¼2¹h2 stationary states are Ãn(x) = L sin(n¼x=L), and the allowed energies are En = 2mL2 , where n = 1; 2; 3:::) p (I) Suppose the wave function for an electron at time t = 0 is given by Ã(x; 0) = 2=L sin(5¼x=L). Which one of the following is the wave function at time t? q 2 (a) Ã(x; t) = sin(5¼x=L) cos(E5t=¹h) qL 2 ¡iE5t=¹h (b) Ã(x; t) = L sin(5¼x=L) e (c) Both (a) and (b) above are appropriate ways to write the wave function. (d) None of the above. q 2 (II) The wave function for an electron at time t = 0 is given by Ã(x; 0) = L sin(5¼x=L). Which one of the following is true about the probability density, jÃ(x; t)j2, after time t? 2 2 2 2 (a) jÃ(x; t)j = L sin (5¼x=L) cos (E5t=¹h).
    [Show full text]
  • First Light: from the Ruby Laser to Nonlinear Optics 1960 – 1962
    First light: from the ruby laser to nonlinear optics 1960 – 1962 J. A. Giordmaine Formerly Columbia University, AT&T Bell Laboratories, NEC Laboratories America, Princeton University 1 The first laser May 16, 1960 Theodore Maiman 2 Background The ammonia beam maser concept 1951 Charles Townes 3 The maser 1954 J. P. Gordon, H. J. Zeiger and C. H. Townes Charles Townes and James Gordon 4 Maser proposal 1954 Nikolai Basov Alexandr Prokhorov 5 3-level solid state masers 1956 N. Bloembergen, H. E. D. Scovil, C. Kikuchi Nicolaas Bloembergen 6 Optical maser proposal 1958 Charles Townes Arthur Schawlow 7 Cr +3 levels in pink ruby 8 New solid state lasers 1960 Sorokin, Stevenson; Schawlow; Wieder Peter Sorokin and Mirek Stevenson 9 The helium neon laser 1960 Ali Javan, William Bennett, Jr. and Donald Herriott 10 Neon and helium energy levels 11 Hole burning and the Lamb dip W. Bennett, Jr. 1961 12 Visible helium neon laser 1962 A. D. White and J. D. Rigden Granularity of scattered laser light 1962 J. D. Rigden and E. I. Gordon Laser speckle 13 Nonlinear optics: Optical second harmonic generation 1961 Peter Franken Gabriel Weinreich 14 Nonlinear optics: Two-Photon Transitions 1961 Wolfgang Geoffrey Kaiser Garrett 15 Phase matching in nonlinear optics 1961 J. Giordmaine / P. Maker, R. Terhune et al 16 Optical Second Harmonic Generation in Anisotropic Crystals 1961 17 Phase Matching in optical second harmonic generation 1961 Incident fundamental beam k1 and diffuse scattering k1’ generate phase matched second harmonic light on the cone k2 with k1 + k1’ = k2 18 The Q -switch laser 1961 R.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Photon? Foundations of Quantum Field Theory
    What is a Photon? Foundations of Quantum Field Theory C. G. Torre June 16, 2018 2 What is a Photon? Foundations of Quantum Field Theory Version 1.0 Copyright c 2018. Charles Torre, Utah State University. PDF created June 16, 2018 Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Why do we need this course? . 5 1.2 Why do we need quantum fields? . 5 1.3 Problems . 6 2 The Harmonic Oscillator 7 2.1 Classical mechanics: Lagrangian, Hamiltonian, and equations of motion . 7 2.2 Classical mechanics: coupled oscillations . 8 2.3 The postulates of quantum mechanics . 10 2.4 The quantum oscillator . 11 2.5 Energy spectrum . 12 2.6 Position, momentum, and their continuous spectra . 15 2.6.1 Position . 15 2.6.2 Momentum . 18 2.6.3 General formalism . 19 2.7 Time evolution . 20 2.8 Coherent States . 23 2.9 Problems . 24 3 Tensor Products and Identical Particles 27 3.1 Definition of the tensor product . 27 3.2 Observables and the tensor product . 31 3.3 Symmetric and antisymmetric tensors. Identical particles. 32 3.4 Symmetrization and anti-symmetrization for any number of particles . 35 3.5 Problems . 36 4 Fock Space 38 4.1 Definitions . 38 4.2 Occupation numbers. Creation and annihilation operators. 40 4.3 Observables. Field operators. 43 4.3.1 1-particle observables . 43 4.3.2 2-particle observables . 46 4.3.3 Field operators and wave functions . 47 4.4 Time evolution of the field operators . 49 4.5 General formalism . 51 3 4 CONTENTS 4.6 Relation to the Hilbert space of quantum normal modes .
    [Show full text]
  • Stationary States in a Potential Well- H.C
    FUNDAMENTALS OF PHYSICS - Vol. II - Stationary States In A Potential Well- H.C. Rosu and J.L. Moran-Lopez STATIONARY STATES IN A POTENTIAL WELL H.C. Rosu and J.L. Moran-Lopez Instituto Potosino de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, SLP, México Keywords: Stationary states, Bohr’s atomic model, Schrödinger equation, Rutherford’s planetary model, Frank-Hertz experiment, Infinite square well potential, Quantum harmonic oscillator, Wilson-Sommerfeld theory, Hydrogen atom Contents 1. Introduction 2. Stationary Orbits in Old Quantum Mechanics 2.1. Quantized Planetary Atomic Model 2.2. Bohr’s Hypotheses and Quantized Circular Orbits 2.3. From Quantized Circles to Elliptical Orbits 2.4. Experimental Proof of the Existence of Atomic Stationary States 3. Stationary States in Wave Mechanics 4. The Infinite Square Well: The Stationary States Most Resembling the Standing Waves on a String 3.1. The Schrödinger Equation 3.2. The Dynamical Phase 3.3. The Schrödinger Wave Stationarity 3.4. Stationary Schrödinger States and Classical Orbits 3.5. Stationary States as Sturm-Liouville Eigenfunctions 5. 1D Parabolic Well: The Stationary States of the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator 5.1. The Solution of the Schrödinger Equation 5.2. The Normalization Constant 5.3. Final Formulas for the HO Stationary States 5.4. The Algebraic Approach: Creation and Annihilation Operators 5.5. HO Spectrum Obtained from Wilson-Sommerfeld Quantization Condition 6. The 3D Coulomb Well: The Stationary States of the Hydrogen Atom 6.1. The Separation of Variables in Spherical Coordinates 6.2. The Angular Separation Constants as Quantum Numbers 6.3. Polar andUNESCO Azimuthal Solutions Set Together – EOLSS 6.4.
    [Show full text]