DOCSLIB.ORG

Forty-Seventh Breeding Bird Census

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forty-Seventh Breeding Bird Census HABITAT STUDIES Forty-seventh Breeding Bird Census Edited by Willet T. and Aldeen C. Van Velzen State or Pairs per Hrs. Yrs o{ Habitat Province Hectares sq.km. Obs. Species Stud• A. Eastern--Deciduous Forest 1. Second-growthHardwood Forest Connccticul 10.1 1094 16 41 17 2. Mixed Upland Forest New York 42.2 315 39 54 3 3. Red Maple Swamp New Jersey 5.5 430 8 11 1 4. Aspen (Cut 1980-81) Pennsylvania 4.2 167 7 4 2 5. Aspen (Cut 1976-77) Pennsylvania 4.0 547 7 15 2 6. Mixed Oak (Cut 1976-77) Pennsylvania 3.3 360 5 9 2 7. Mature Aspen (Treated Sector) Pennsylvania 2.6 536 5 16 2 8. Mature Mixed Oak (Treated Sector) Pennsylvania 3.2 262 5 14 2 9. Mature Aspen(Untreated Sector) Pennsylvania 3.0 167 5 11 2 10. Birch Maple Oak Forest Pennsylvania 9.0 579 -- 29 7 11. BlackCherry Maple Clearcut Pennsylvania 3.0 483 16 9 1 12. Black Cherry-Maple Clearcut Pennsylvania 3.0 583 16 12 1 13. BlackCherry-Maple Clearcut Pennsylvania 3.0 917 16 11 1 14. Black Cherry-Maple Clearcut Pennsylvania 3.0 500 16 8 1 15. Black Cherry Maple Clearcut Pennsylvania 3.0 833 16 13 1 16. BlackCherry-Maple Clearcut Pennsylvania 3.0 483 16 10 1 17. Oak Maple Ridge-topForest Pennsylvania 19.4 119 12 11 2 18. Oak Maple Slope Forest Pennsylvania 16.9 142 11 16 2 19. SugarMaple Mixed HardwoodForest Pennsylvania 9.7 755 28 28 2 20. UplandOak-Maple Forest(Sprayed) Pennsylvania 20.0 328 32 23 1 21. UplandOak Maple Forest(Unsprayed) Pennsylvania 20.0 358 32 21 1 22. Mature DeciduousFloodplain Forest Maryland 7.6 863 29 25 31 23. Mixed Hardwood Forest Maryland 11.3 1341 27 49 19 24. Mixed Upland Habitat Dist. of Columbia 14.2 830 24 22 24 25. Cherry-Locust-Oak Forest West Virginia 6.1 420 15 17 1 26. Cherry-Tulip-tree Locust West Virginia 6.1 618 10 25 1 27. Maple-Beech Forest West Virginia 6.1 247 34 15 6 28. Maple-Oak-Beech Forest West Virginia 6.1 363 10 14 5 29. UplandBlack Cherry Forest West Virginia 6.1 346 8 14 3 30. Wild Cherry-Hickory Forest West Virginia 6.1 528 10 23 1 31. MesophyticForest Virginia 6.1 1202 24 23 1 32. Mixed Oak Forest Virginia 8.1 333 18 22 2 33. Oak-Hickory Forest Virginia 6.1 272 10 16 1 34. Upland Oak-Hickory Forest Virginia ll.0 1036 43 23 11 35. FloodplainForest North Carolina 13.0 696 20 26 7 36. Mixed Deciduous Forest North Carolina 12.6 614 21 31 8 37. HardwoodSwamp Forest South Carolina 8.1 1835 16 22 3 38. Hardwood Woodlot Ontario 10.2 152 14 7 1 39. Urban Maple-Oak Woodlot (1978) Ontario 4.0 346 II 12 1 (1979) 4.0 408 10 13 2 (1980) 4.0 741 10 22 3 (1981) 4.0 605 9 23 4 44). UrbanBasswood-Maple Woodlot (1978) Ontario 2.2 494 4 9 1 (1979) 2.2 539 6 10 2 (•980) 2.2 764 8 13 3 (1981) 2.2 741 4 13 4 41. Urban Beech Ash-Maple Woodlot (1978) Ontario 1.3 797 2 6 1 (1979) 1.3 797 4 4 2 (1980) 1.3 917 5 6 3 (1981) 1.3 1076 2 6 4 42. UrbanOak-Maple Woodlot (1978) Ontario 0.9 730 3 9 1 (1979) 0.9 786 5 6 2 (1980) 0.9 618 6 9 3 (1981) 0.9 112 2 6 4 43. Urban Young Ash-HawthornWoodlot (1979) Ontario 1.3 562 5 6 1 (1980) 1.3 674 6 10 2 64 AmericanBtrds, January February 1984 State or Pairs per Hrs. Yrs. Habitttt Province Hectares sq.km. Obs. Species Study 44. Urban Mixed Deciduous with Pines (1980) Ontario 2.2 1213 7 15 45. Urban Oak Maple Ash Woodlot (1978) Ontario 1.1 808 3 12 (1979) 1.1 713 5 8 (1980) 1.1 1140 5 9 46. Urban Maple-Oak-Birch Woodlot (1978) Ontario 2,3 750 5 15 (1979) 2.3 794 7 15 (1980) 2,3 927 10 16 47. Urban Maple-Ash Woodlot (1979) Ontario 1.9 263 3 6 (1980) 1.9 421 6 9 48. Urban Maple-BeechWoodlot (1979) Ontario 1.5 549 3 5 (1980) 1,5 515 5 9 49. Urban Maple Oak Beech Woodlot (1979) Ontario 1.1 713 3 6 (1980) I. 1 808 4 7 50. Urban Oak Cherry Woodlot (1979) Ontario 2.4 1194 16 18 (1980) 2.4 1277 16 19 (1981) 2.4 1152 6 19 51. Urban Hickory-Maple Woodlot (1979) Ontario 1.9 657 6 13 (1980) 1.9 605 7 12 52. Urban Hickory-Ash-Basswood Woodlot (1979) Ontario 0.8 845 5 13 (1980) 0.8 1040 5 10 53, Urban Hickory Woodlot (1979) Ontario 1.6 602 6 10 (1980) 1.6 539 6 12 54. Urban Ash-Oak Woodlot (1979) Ontario 1.2 659 4 9 ( 1980) 1.2 906 5 14 55. Urban Maple-Oak Woodlot (1979) Ontario 0.9 674 4 7 (1980) 0.9 786 4 8 56. Urban Maple-Oak-Ash Woodlot (1978) Ontario 7.0 589 22 22 (1979) 7.0 754 18 21 2 (1980) 7.0 963 23 23 3 (1981) 7.0 805 8 25 4 57. Soft Maple Hickory Woodlot Ontario 14.3 434 17 17 1 58. Wooded City Ravine Ontario 20.0 175 20 17 14 59. Moist Deciduous Forest Michigan 10.0 315 26 16 I 60. Mixed DeciduousSecond Growth FloodplainForest Illinois 29.1 510 89 28 1 61. Oak-Hickory Forest Illinois 9. I 499 I 1 25 3 62. Oak-Maple Forest and Edge Illinois 24.0 233 14 76 45 63. Neotoma Valley Ohio 20.2 450 80 34 6 64, Mixed Deciduous Forest Tennessee 25,4 286 10 22 2 65. Upland HardwoodForest I Tennessee 6.0 362 10 17 I 66. Upland Hardwood Forest I1 Tennessee 6.0 231 10 II 1 B. Eastern-Coniferous-Deciduous (Mixed) 67. Climax Hemlock-White Pine Forest, with Transition Hardwoods Connecticut 10.5 1008 16 36 17 68. Burned Pine-Oak Forest Massachusetts 56.0 2O8 188 37 I 69. Maple-Pine-Oak Second-growthForest Massachusetts 11.8 465 24 24 7 70. Pitch Pine-Scrub Oak Barrens New York 9.7 336 14 6 7 71. Second-growthOak-Pitch Pine Forest New York 9.3 554 37 13 7 72. Upland Mixed Pine-SpruceHardwood Plantation New York 16.6 524 16 31 10 73. Central Hardwood Forest with Scattered Pine Dist. of Columbia 26.3 321 37 26 24 74. Birch-SpruceFir Forest West Virginia 6.1 585 16 25 3 75. Virgin Spruce-NorthernHardwoods Forest West Virginia 6.1 651 10 18 6 76. Disturbed Mixed Coniferous-Hardwood Forest Georgia 9.8 541 30 2 C. Eastern-Coniferous 77. Red Pine Plantation Connecticut 8.5 1447 15 43 6 78. Upland ChristmasTree Farm New York 10.7 382 16 19 I 79. Upland ScotchPine Plantation New York 9.3 730 22 27 15 80. Spruce-PineForest Pennsylvania 6.1 395 9 18 1 81. YoungSpruce Forest West Virginia 6.1 296 9 11 8 D. Eastern-Mixed Habitat 82. Mixed Upland Habitat and Swamp Connecticut 14.2 155 6 23 16 83. OabHemlock Forest, Transition Forest and Thicket Connecticut 29.6 655 63 38 13 84. Upland Brushy Pasture Connecticut 8.5 1418 16 39 17 85. Moist Deciduous ForestLake Ontario Wetland New York 16.2 909 8 39 2 Volume 38, Number I 65 State or Pairs per Hrs. Yr• • Habitat Provim'e Hectares sq.km. Ohs. Sl?ecies Studl 86. Deciduous Forest with Pond and Brook New Jersey 16.2 321 9 30 20 87. Mixed Lowland Forest and Meadow with Stream Pennsylvania 8.1 1093 18 42 3 88. Old Field-Meadow and Primary DeciduousThickets Pennsylvania 10.1 326 16 21 8 89. Abandoned Pasture Scrubland Ontario 9.0 506 23 32 2 90. Transitional Mixed Forest-Field Ontario 6.0 1110 58 20 4 91. DisturbedOak-Hickory, Pine Stand, Edge, and Pond Ohio 14.2 593 25 38 45 92. Deciduous Clearcut Tennessee 20.2 445 10 25 9 93. Mixe•Mesophytic Woods,Fields, and Brush Tennessee 27.0 378 38 41 7 94. SuburbanCemetery Alabama 15.0 633 97 25 6 E. Central-Prairie 95. Restored Tall Grass Prairie Illinois 12.1 370 9 16 8 96. Tall Grass Prairie 1 Iowa 16.0 318 14 14 2 97. Tall Grass Prairie II Iowa 64.8 159 56 16 2 98. Tall Grass Prairie II1 Iowa 44.8 266 34 20 2 99. KentuckyBlue GrassPrairie North Dakota 4.8 300 3 I1 12 100. Mixed Prairie 1 North Dakota 10.0 300 6 18 12 101. Mixed Prairie II North Dakota 6.1 221 3 11 12 102. Mixed Prairie II1 North Dakota 6.1 98 4 6 12 103. Mixed Prairie 1V North Dakota 6.1 122 3 8 12 104. Mixed Prairie V North Dakota 6.1 180 4 9 12 105. Mixed Prairie Vlll North Dakota 8.7 132 4 9 8 106. FloodplainTall GrassPrairie Kansas 10.1 257 38 6 10 107. Short Grass Prairie Kansas 15.0 143 8 5 I F. Central-Disturbed Habitat 108. BroKe SeededDikes-Sewage Lagoons II Kansas 50.6 62 6 8 1 109. ImprovedPasture and Oa•Pine Forest Oklahoma 9.1 768 27 27 5 110.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Resource Name (Heading 1)
    Monongahela National Forest Forest-wide Travel Analysis Report Appendix H Monongahela National Forest Forest-Scale Roads Analysis 2003 September 2015 Appendix H 200 Sycamore Street Phone 304-636-1800 Monongahela National Forest Elkins, WV 26241 Fax 304 636 1875 Roads Analysis Report Forest Scale Roads Analysis Monongahela National Forest January 13, 2003 Version 2.0 Page 1 of 160 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page OVERVIEW OF ROADS ANALYSIS GUIDANCE…………………………………… 5 INTRODUCTION Background………………………………………………………………………. 7 Process…………………………………………………………………………… 7 Products………………………………………………………………………….. 8 This Report………………………………………………………………………. 8 STEP 1: SETTING UP THE ANALYSIS Purpose and Products……………………………………………………………. 9 Objectives of the Analysis………………………………………………………. 9 Interdisciplinary Team Members and Participants……………………………… 10 Information Needs………………………………………………………………. 10 Analysis Plan……………………………………………………………………. 10 STEP 2: DESCRIBING THE SITUATION Purpose and Products……………………………………………………………. 11 The Analysis Area………………………………………………………………. 11 Existing Road and Access System Description…………………………………. 13 Forest Plan Goal…………………………………………………………………. 17 Forest Plan Objectives…………………………………………………………… 17 Meeting Forest Plan Objectives…………………………………………………. 20 Budget……………………………………………………………………………. 22 Road Inventory…………………………………………………………………… 22 Human Population in the Analysis Area…………………………………………. 30 Road Definitions…………………………………………………………………. 45 Basic Data Needs………………………………………………………………… 50 STEP 3: IDENTIFYING ISSUES Purpose and Products…………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Public Comment, Appendix B
    Summary of Public Comment on Roadless Area Conservation Appendix B Requests for Inclusion or Exemption of Specific Areas Table B-1. Requested Inclusions Under the Proposed Rulemaking. Region 1 Northern NATIONAL FOREST OR AREA STATE GRASSLAND The state of Idaho Multiple ID (Individual, Boise, ID - #6033.10200) Roadless areas in Idaho Multiple ID (Individual, Olga, WA - #16638.10110) Inventoried and uninventoried roadless areas (including those Multiple ID, MT encompassed in the Northern Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act) (Individual, Bemidji, MN - #7964.64351) Roadless areas in Montana Multiple MT (Individual, Olga, WA - #16638.10110) Pioneer Scenic Byway in southwest Montana Beaverhead MT (Individual, Butte, MT - #50515.64351) West Big Hole area Beaverhead MT (Individual, Minneapolis, MN - #2892.83000) Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness, along the Selway River, and the Beaverhead-Deerlodge, MT Anaconda-Pintler Wilderness, at Johnson lake, the Pioneer Bitterroot Mountains in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest and the Great Bear Wilderness (Individual, Missoula, MT - #16940.90200) CLEARWATER NATIONAL FOREST: NORTH FORK Bighorn, Clearwater, Idaho ID, MT, COUNTRY- Panhandle, Lolo WY MALLARD-LARKINS--1300 (also on the Idaho Panhandle National Forest)….encompasses most of the high country between the St. Joe and North Fork Clearwater Rivers….a low elevation section of the North Fork Clearwater….Logging sales (Lower Salmon and Dworshak Blowdown) …a potential wild and scenic river section of the North Fork... THE GREAT BURN--1301 (or Hoodoo also on the Lolo National Forest) … harbors the incomparable Kelly Creek and includes its confluence with Cayuse Creek. This area forms a major headwaters for the North Fork of the Clearwater. …Fish Lake… the Jap, Siam, Goose and Shell Creek drainages WEITAS CREEK--1306 (Bighorn-Weitas)…Weitas Creek…North Fork Clearwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology Activity Book
    Archaeology Activity Book Illustrations: Heather Brindza Text: Danielle Ellis Layout: Rebecca Conway Appalachian Forest Heritage Area (AFHA) is a non-profit, grassroots organization that promotes economic and community development by linking central Appalachian forest history, culture, natural history, products and forest management into a multi-state heritage tourism initiative. Monongahela National Forest hosts AFHA-sponsored AmeriCorps service at forest sites that enhance natural resources and tourism and connect local communities. The Eastern National Forests Interpretive Association (ENFIA) is a non-profit association that aids and promotes the historical, scientific, and educational activities of the USDA Forest Service. This activity book was made possible through grants and partnership agreements with AFHA AmeriCorps, ENFIA, and USDA Forest Service. Archaeology is the study of material culture left behind by people from the past. Material culture are things created or used by people, like stone tools, a glass bottle, or even an entire building. Archaeologists look for archaeological sites to try to answer questions about the past. A site is where artifacts, features, or ecofacts are grouped together in an area. This means people were in that area in the past, and it’s up to the archaeologist to figure out what they were doing there. Sometimes archaeologists find things that can’t be easily collected or are part of the environment past peoples used. These things are called features. Features are often large, like the foundation of a house, or difficult to collect from the site, like an ashy campfire ring. Feature example: campfire ring Artifacts are things created or used by past peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheat Mountain Salamander Recovery Plan
    CHEAT MOUNTAIN SALAMANDER (Plethodon neftiigi) RECOVERY PLAN Region Five U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service CHEAT MOUNTAIN SALAMANDER (Plethodon nettingi) RECOVERY PLAN Prepared by: Thomas K. Pauley Department of Biological Sciences Marshall University Huntington, WV 25755 for: Northeast Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Newton Corner, MA 02158 Approved: Regional Director, N east Regi U.S. Fish and WildV Service Date: * * * This recovery plan delineates reasonable actions needed to recover and/or protect the threatened Cheat Mountain Salamander. The plan does not necessarily represent the views or official position of any particular individuals or agencies involved in plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The proposals in this plan are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Objectives will be attained and funds expended contingent upon appropriations, priorities, and other budgetary constraints. Literature citations should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1991. Cheat Mountain Salamander Recovery Plan. Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 35 pp. Additional copies may be purchased from: Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 301-492-6403 or 1-800-582-3421 Fees vary according to number of pages. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Cheat Mountain Salamander Recovery Plan Current Species Status: The Cheat Mountain salamander is currently known to exist at 68 sites within an approximately 700 square-mile area in West Virginia. Most of these populations are small, with less than ten salamanders observed. Although historical levels are not known, it is likely that the current population represents oniy a small portion of the species’ former distribution and population levels.
    [Show full text]
  • County Snapshot County Snapshot | 2
    County Snapshot County Snapshot | 2 CONTENTS Introduction 4 Quick Facts 5 Population and Size 5 County Boards, Authorities, Commissions and Committees 5 Regional Boards, Authorities and Services 8 People 10 Population (Current) 10 Population History 10 Population Forecast 10 Sex and Age 12 Race 14 Relationships 17 Income 18 Education 20 Veterans 21 Economic Development 22 Economic Characteristics 22 2007 Economic Census 25 Natural and Cultural Resources 27 Natural Resources 27 Historic and Cultural Resources 29 Agriculture 33 County Snapshot | 3 Housing 36 Households By Type 36 Housing Occupancy 36 Housing Tenure 37 Housing Characteristics 37 Infrastructure & Community Facilities 42 Schools 42 Emergency Services 42 County Facilities (Parks, Community Buildings) 43 Sewer & Water 44 Transportation 45 The Local Government Comprehensive Plan and Transportation Plan 45 VDOT Six Year Improvement Program List 46 Mt. Rogers Planning District Commission – 2035 Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 47 Land Use 49 Appendix 53 2002 Comprehensive Plan 53 2013 Comprehensive Plan Project Outline 53 County Snapshot | 4 Introduction The Community Snapshot contains supporting information about the County which will be used as a reference during the comprehensive planning process. Data included in this document comes from a variety of sources. The document will be amended as new information is available. County Snapshot | 5 Quick Facts Population and Size Census 2010 Total Population - 54,876 people (U.S. Census Bureau 2010 Demographic Profile) 1990-2000 Population growth of 11%. • 2000-2010 Population growth of 7.4% • April 1, 2010-July 1, 2012 percent change 0.6% Washington County is approximately 560 square miles and is divided into seven electoral districts: • A-11, Harrison District • B-11, Jefferson District • C-11, Madison District • D-11, Monroe District • E-11, Taylor District • F-11, Tyler District • G-11, Wilson District There are three towns located in Washington County: • Abingdon (County Seat) – population 8,193 (Source: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Endangered Wildlife West Virginia
    occur in large rivers and are known from the Ohio, Elk, The bald eagles primary food is fish, so they are Randolph County. The Cheat Mountain salamander is or Kanawha rivers in West Virginia: pink mucket pearly most often seen in the vicinity of our larger rivers and restricted to cool, moist forests, usually in habitats con- mussel, Lampsilis abrupta; tuberculed-blossom pearly lakes. The WRS monitors the states six eagle nests taining red spruce in areas over 3,150 feet in elevation. mussel, Epioblasma torulosa torulosa; fanshell, and searches for additional nests with the hope that This salamander attains a length of four inches Cyprogenia stegaria; clubshell, Pleurobema clava; this magnificent bird will continue to expand its range andhas a dark back sprinkled with brassy or silvery flecks. Threatened and northern riffleshell, Epioblasma rangiana. The further into West Virginia. Sightings of eagle pairs, The belly and throat are a uniform dark gray. These small And clubshell has also been found in moderate-sized especially in spring and summer, should be reported to amphibians may live to be 10 years of age. Like all wood- streams.The James spinymussel, Pleurobema collina, the Nongame Wildlife and Natural Heritage Program. land salamanders, the Cheat Mountain salamander does shown left, occurs in small headwater tributaries of the not possess lungs, but must breathe through its skin James River. Freshwater mussels are important indica- and the lining of the mouth and throat. The food of these Endangered tors of water quality; most species cannot tolerate reduc- animals consist of mites, small insects and other small tions in dissolved oxygen or increases in pollutants, acid- woodland invertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Natural and Cultural Resources
    NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES 4. Natural and Cultural Resources Washington County is rich with natural and historic resources that represent a strong community identity. These scenic features not only contribute to the environmental health and quality of life for Washington County residents, they are tourism assets. The natural environment often dictates how we use land. Development potential for land is dependent on many physical characteristics. Soil conditions, slopes, flood frequency and wetlands all affect where development can safely and feasibly occur. These and other environmentally sensitive features, such as surface water, ground water and air quality, should be given consideration in the planning process. The history of Washington County is important, and awareness and preservation of historical assets is an important activity to continue in the furure. Our historic and cultural resources attract visitors to our area, provide us a touchstone to our past and contribute to the sense of place that makes Washington County a special place to live. Since natural and cultural resources may be affected by future growth and development, it is important to consider these assets when planning the future of Washington County. Supp. No. 14 CP4:59 WASHINGTON COUNTY CODE Natural Resources Physical Geography The majority of Washington County land (95%) lies in the Valley and Ridge physiographic province of Virginia. The Whitetop Mountain area (approximately 5%) in the extreme southeastern corner of the county lies in the Blue Ridge physiographic province. The county consists of a broad valley which extend in a northeast to southwest direction. The valley is bordered by the dominant ridges of Clinch Mountain on the northwest and Iron Mountain on the southeast.
    [Show full text]
  • THE APPALACHIAN FORESTS Putting the New Law Into Operation
    THE APPALACHIAN FORESTS Putting the New Law Into Operation ~BE new national forest law calls into action several official agencies, but U the initiative in the purchase of land as well as the consummation of such purchase when authorized rests with the Department of Agricul­ ture which, of course, acts through the Forest Service. The Service has made very complete arrangements for an efficient carrying out of the full intent of toe law. Assistant Forester William L. Hall, who conducted the investigation in the Southern Appalachian and White Mountains under the $25,000 appropriation in 1907, and is therefore well fitted for the task by per­ sonal .knowledge of the conditions in both sections, has been recalled from Madison, Wisconsin, where he has been in charge of the branch of forest prod­ ucts sinee the opening of the new laboratory last year and has been put in charge of the work of establishing the new national forests. McGarvey Cline, who was Mr. Hall's second in command at Madison, has been put in charge of the branch of forest products with headquarters at that place. Mr. Hall has already estahlished his office in Washington and is at work on the great and responsihle task in which so many people in so many states are interested. For reasons which were mentioned in AMERJCAN FORESTRY last month the White Mountain situation is heing especially studied, hut the south­ ern mountains are also heing districted and undergoing preliminary exam­ inations and offers of land are heing received and considered from several of the states which have passed the necessary enabling act.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 41 November 1995 No. 4 the Highest Mountains in Virg
    a DEPARTMENT OF MINES, mRALS, AND Richmond, Virginia VOL. 41 NOVEMBER 1995 NO. 4 - THE HIGHEST MOUNTAINS IN VIRG- MT. ROGERS AND WHlTETOP OR. BALSAM AND MEADOW MOUNTAINS? Douglas W. Ogle1 Associate Professor of Biology Virginia Highlands Community College Abingdon, VA 242 12-0828 The highest elevations within the boundaries of Virginia are found in the southwestern part of the state in the Blue Ridge Mountains. This portion of the Blue Ridge, often called the Iron Mountain range, is continuous with the Unaka range of Tennessee and North Carolina. The two highest summits in the state are less than four miles apart as a crow flies (or a raven at these elevations). Together, they dominate the sky- line and in many ways are very similar. They are both broadly rounded and have a much darker color on top. In early win- ter, the cooler temperatures cause the first frosts and snows to precipitate on the summits and causes them to appear bright white. In spring and summer, the summits show a dark ver- dant green atop the much lighter greens of lower elevations. Even in the fall, when the lower deciduous buckeyes, maples, beeches, and birches simply riot with color, the stable homo- geneous crests stand like a somber parent with a brightly dressed adolescent. The summits almost always contrast with Figure 1. Frye-Jefferson Map of 1751-1754 showing lower slopes. "Meadow Mountain", the present day Whitetop Mountain. The second highest mountain is the famous Whitetop Mountain at 5,520 feet. Whitetop has been noted on almost cap of the summit.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Vol. 6, No. 3
    BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA STATE MUSEUM BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Volume 6 Number 3 REVISION OF NORTH AMERICAN SALAMANDERS OF THE GENUS PLETHODON Richard Highton *,1 Of * /853 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA Gainesville 1963 Numbers of the BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA STATE MUSEUM are pub- lished at irregular intervals. Volumes contain about 300 pages and are not nec- essarily completed in any one calendar year. WILLIAM J . RIEMER , Managing Editor OLIVER L. AUSTIN, JR., Editor Consultant for. this issue: Wilfred T. Neill Communications concerning purchase or exchange of the publication and all man- uscripts should be addressed to the Managing Editor of the Bulletin, Florida State Museum, Seagle Building, Gainesville, Florida. Published 81 December 1962 Price for this issue $1.55 REVISION OF NORTH AMERICAN SALAMANDERS OF THE GENUS PLETHODON RICHARD HIGHTON 1 SYNOPSIS: Systematic study of the North American salamander genus Plethodon reveals three major groups in the genus, designated the western plethodons, the eastern small plethodons, and the eastern large plethodons. The western plethodons occur in the northwestern United States and adjacent Canada and include five species (vandykei, larselli, dunni, ©ehiculum, and elongatus) in thre6 species groups. Five species in three species groups also comprise the eastern small plethodons. Four of these (weHeri, dorsalis, cinereus, and richmondi) occur in eastern North America; the fifth (neomexicanus) is kn6wn only from the Jemez Mountains of New Mexico. The eastern large plethodons include six species (wehrlet, vonahlossee,.ouachitae, caddoensis, iordani. and glutinosus) in three species groups and occur only east of the Rocky Mountains. The eastern large and small plethodons are more closely related to each othei than either is to the western plethodons, but of the two, the small group appears to be closer to the Western plethodons.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Highlands Conservancy
    NON-PROFIT West U.S. POSTAGE PAID PERMIT NO. 2831 CHARLESTON, WV Virginia 25301 Highlands Conservancy Working since 1967 for the conservation and wise management of West Virginia's Natural Resources • ~ . • '1. X ~ ~: ~ ~ . Spv ' ~ ,Rcw ~ 2 000 A pvlL 2 8-3 () - C'heed: M01M1t""CU:W C l«1:J For over 30 yeavj-J tfl,e, Weit-VW~H~C~CM'\0' ~ bee-w~ ~very jfJeciclLcwertt. /he,tSpr~'RcwieMJ ~~cvW~VW~tretiUt:ww qfcelebr-at"~~H~ Itw~pretni,ey opp~ t&enjd)' t~ ~~~water~ Wl?/ worlv l& hartLtcr prot-ect: 71t.Ur year- Wl?/ waL btv e1<;plor~ ~upper S"fuivver~ for1v of~ Ch.eat: 'RiNer ~~new~ eteq~£UL Foreft Serv(.ce.­ L~~ n n ./ .. few «Wer ·1 00 yean-knownt ~ C\1 ~pZa<;.e,(or hunt'~ ~~wilder-~culNE?duYE?.$ thet Chea:t Mount"CLi.w CUib- w cv f!Jecial,; r-a-r-ea:i fr"om.;thet ~wor-u~ cvw~ quie:t, co-wt:{ort~ ~thatfo1;te¥Jrcont"e-mplat'~ ~tcdlv, ~ r-ecreat'~ et'ljoy~ i.¥\1 cv pZa<;.e, of f!Jed"acular naturaL becu<ty. I Y\1 ~ jJJe,ci..c;W neMJ ~e¥ yow waLfi,ruL cUlt thet ·Ln[ormat""t.Crv yow will/_ need,-W. r-~e¥ for ~ yea¥1rSpr-~'REWLe.w. Jtw{iUlrof'~~ Ln[ormat""tOY\Iowthet ''Chea:t M~'B~·· ~Cit'~ ef{ortl'to-pr-Otec:t-~ yef(::or(!,l£h.e, CtrU\1, II ~ in{ormat""tOY\I wilL~ yow be:tte¥ under~~ et'ljoy yo-ur - w~ with-~ or if yow ~to-~lor(!,l~ lfJ~pZa<;.e, £Nt1.0the¥ t"'~ Either way, W(!,l hop{!/ yow wilL~ itJrlfJi¥~ ~learr\lto-app~ecia.t"(!,l~ll'ecial,;P~ Ot'\.elof£h.e,lar~cont"~ar~of £h.e, liM~ Nat'~ for-e-ft: II A lPeciaJ.;~to- till.tthetpeopte, who-eot'ltY~to-~ ne-w~~ m,ade,~ lfJecial,; .
    [Show full text]
  • HIKING CLUB Is Organized Under the Auspices of the a Current Club Project Is Construction and Mai Ntena Nce of RECREATION CLUB the Trail of the Lonesome Pine
    TENNESSEE EASTMAN THE TENNESSEE EASTMAN RECREATION CLUB TRAIL OF THE LONESOME PINE HIKING CLUB is organized under the auspices of the A current Club project is construction and mai ntenance of RECREATION CLUB the Trail of the Lonesome Pine. This t rail will follow the Tennessee Eastman Recreation Club of Tennessee crest of Clinch Mountains from the Virginia line to U.S. 25 Eastman Company, a Division of Eastman Kodak Com­ near Knoxville. It is hoped this trail will relieve congestion pany, for the benefit of Eastman employees and their on the Appalachian Trail. The Tennessee state legislature has designated t his t rail as part of a state wide scenic t rail Hiking Club families. Membership requirements consist of con­ system. Other trails which will be part of this system are current membership in the Recreation Club and pay­ the Natchez Trace Trail which parallels the Natchez Trace ment of $1.00 annual dues. Parkway; the Appalachian Trail; the Cumberland Trail, which KINGSPORT, TENNESSEE will extend from the Cumberland Gap to Chattanooga, Tn; the John Muir trail; and the Trail of Tears, which retraces t he Persons not Eastman employees are always welcome route the Cherokees took when t hey were removed from at all Club activities but must be invited and attend Tennessee. with an Eastman member. Nonmembers may obtain CANOEING schedules at the Recreation Office in Building 89 or River Difficulty and Paddler Skill Grading Guidelines 310. Notices will be mailed to nonmembers on pay­ CLASS Very Easy. Waves small, regular. Passages clear. ment of $1.00 per year.
    [Show full text]