The Memory of the First World War at Its Centenary in Britain: a Study of War Memory at National, Local and Individual Levels
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 The Memory of the First World War at its Centenary in Britain: A Study of War Memory at National, Local and Individual Levels Olivia Smith A thesis submitted for the degree of Masters University of Essex Department of History Year of Award (December 2019) 2 Contents Page Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… P.3 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………P.4 Chapter 1 First World War Cultural Memory From 1914-2014…………………………………………… P.16 Chapter 2 State Events and Public Art Projects…………………………………………………………………… P.33 Chapter 3 Heritage Lottery Fund and The Role Of Communities………………………………………… P.64 Chapter 4 How Do You Remember the War? A Study on Individual War Memory……………… P.80 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… P.111 Appendix…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… P.116 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… P.120 Word Count: 29,794 Abstract 3 This research project examines the commemoration of the First World War Centenary (2014- 2018) in Britain and assess the relationship of between centenary events and cultural memory of the war. Since the Armistice in 1918, the memory of the First World War has been reshaped throughout the past century and the pity of war narrative, as told by poets, of trench warfare that amassed in thousands dead, is the dominant commonly held view. The centenary can be perceived as a unique modern platform that could change these dominant narratives, and this research project will ask, did it? By looking at commemoration from a national perspective through the British government marking the outbreak of war in 2014, the Battle of the Somme in 2016, the Battle of Passchendaele in 2017 and Armistice in 2018 and public art projects from 1418- NOW, to see how they acted as agents of war memory and to what extent they modernised or retained traditional commemoration. The Heritage Lottery Fund funded communities across Britain to commemorate the centenary in their own way. It is here we see the ‘world’ of First World War being acknowledged and what impact this has within the dominant popular memory. A study on individual memory investigated the popular responses to topics involving the centenary, the current battlefields and the future of commemoration. The consistent resonance of family connections to the First World War has shown to be a motivating factor for public involvement in the centenary and how modern media brought the topic of the First World War to an audience that may have not been aware of a centennial national commemoration. This project will assess if the centenary distorted the dominant popular perceptions of the First World War or if it retained them. Introduction 4 In 2013 the ‘No Glory’ campaign entered the British news as they campaigned against the British government’s choice of narrative by which they would commemorate the centenary of the First World War. High profile celebrities and anti-war activists raised concerns that the ‘war will be presented as something glorious and part of our national heritage’ because they believed the First World War to be ‘a total disaster that was unnecessary and destroyed a generation’.1 This was only the beginning of controversies that were to surround British plans to mark the centenary. As Andrew Murrison the British Special Representative for Centenary Commemorations, met with his German counterpart in 2013, it was revealed that Germany wanted a ‘less declamatory tone about who was responsible for the conflict and greater acknowledgement of their shared losses’.2 It is no surprise that historians of the First World War also criticised the British government in their choice of centenary narrative. Their concerns were that too much focus was being placed on ‘British defeats and the carnage and futility of the war’3 because the British government wanted to avoid ‘upsetting’ the Germans. Revisionist and military historian Gary Sheffield claimed the government’s centenary planning was late in comparison to its Commonwealth partners Australia and New Zealand and argued against the government’s plans that appeared to focus on the defeats of the First World War and largely ignoring the success and victory of 1918. 1 Ben Quinn. Anti-War Activists Battle To Get Their Voices Heard in WW1 Centenary Events, The Guardian Sept 2013, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/08/anti-war-activists-ww1-centenary (Accessed 2 August 2019) 2 Michael Roper and Rachel Duffett. Family Legacies in the Centenary: Motives for First World War Commemoration Among British and German Descendants, History & Memory, Volume 30, Number 1, Spring / Summer 2018, p.85. 3 Jasper Coppering. Historians Complain Government’s WW1 Commemoration ‘Focuses on British Defeats’, The Telegraph, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/britain-at-war/10037507/Historians-complain- Governments-WW1-commemoration-focuses-on-British-defeats.html (Accessed 2 August 2019) 5 Military historian Hew Strachan voiced his concerns of the centenary turning into ‘Remembrance Sunday writ large’,4 in January 2014 the then Education Secretary Michael Gove contributed to the concerns over the centenary by stating that the Left-Wing and Blackadder Myths of the First World War ‘belittle’ Britain and ensure Germany avoids blame. Gove justifies his argument that the First World War was a ‘just war’ against German aggression, whilst criticising fictional media such as Oh! What a Lovely War, The Monocled Mutineer and Blackadder insisting they make the public believe the war is a ‘misbegotten shambles’. Gove stressed how our contemporary understanding of the war has been ‘overlaid by misunderstandings and misrepresentations’5 which led Lucy Noakes to conclude that Gove was ‘weaponizing cultural memory’ in a political attack on the Left and reiterating the viewpoints of the politicians in 1918 ‘who favoured the celebration of victory over the commemoration of the dead’.6 Despite these conflicting views of how the First World War centenary should be perceived, it was widely agreed that the first industrialised, globalised war had to be commemorated on a grand scale, to acknowledge its profound impact on the United Kingdom then and now. The centenary could also be perceived as a part of a wider process of looking back at the history of the First World War. This Research Project will examine the commemoration of the centenary in Britain between 2014-2018 in order to consider the various ways that the war was represented and the inter-relationship between events and wider cultural memory of the war. 4 Ben Quinn. Anti-War Activists Battle To Get Their Voices Heard in WW1 Centenary Events, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/08/anti-war-activists-ww1-centenary (Accessed 2 August 2019) 5 Tim Shipman. Michael Gove Blasts ‘Blackadder Myths’ about the First World War Spread by Television Sit-Coms and Left Wing Academics, Daily Mail https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article- 2532923/Michael-Gove-blasts-Blackadder-myths-First-World-War-spread-television-sit-coms-left-wing- academics.html (Accessed 2 August 2019) 6 Noakes, Lucy. Centenary, in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopaedia of the First World War, ed. by Ute Daniel, Peter Gatrell, Oliver Janz, Heather Jones, Jennifer Keene, Alan Kramer, and Bill Nasson, issued by Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin 2019-06-03. DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.11369. (Accessed 20 August 2019) 6 This project will explore whether the centenary created an awareness and connection to the history of the First World War which may not have existed previously. One example of this was ‘A Nations Thank You- The People’s Procession’ which saw 10,000 ballot chosen people march through London to the Cenotaph to mark the centenary of the signing of Armistice in 2018. Each individual had a reason to be there, from the two individuals who remembered their great- grandfathers, with one having died two weeks before the Armistice in Flanders7 and the other simply wanting to honour his memory for ‘what he did for our freedom’.8 Others remembered a relative’s experience: ‘I’m really here to honour the courage of my grandmother. She was obviously traumatised and remained a widow for the rest of her life’9 and not forgetting the ‘emotional’ pride from the members of the public who marched wearing relatives’ medals. As the First World War is out of living memory in the United Kingdom, these events demonstrate the power of the cultural memory of the war as it retains its resonance amongst some people in society. The People’s Procession is just one example of the vast number of centenary events organised around the country and is a good example demonstrating some of the complexities underpinning why people wanted to be a part of this national centenary. The many reasons for this involvement will be explained later on in the project. Methodology This project will examine representations of the war at three different levels, focussing on national, community and individual events and perspectives. Before exploring these, the methodology used and the approaches of cultural and popular memory of the First World War 7 Ali Gibson, Thousands March In 'People's Procession' To Honour War Dead, https://www.forces.net/news/thousands-march-peoples-procession-honour-war-dead (Accessed 8 February 2019) 8Jackson, Marie. Remembrance Day: Pride and awe at the People's Procession, BBC News https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46172641 (Accessed 8 February 2019) 9 Ibid 7 will be discussed. Jay Winter summarises cultural memory as ‘how men and woman make sense of the world in which they live’10 whilst Bart Ziino explains how ‘narratives attached to the First World War are not static or agreed, but are subject to constant contestation, and change over time’.11 As First World War British cultural memory tends to privilege literary and artistic representations of the past, Ziino also addresses how ‘a selection of materials forms a specific understanding of the First World War’12 and whilst these exact materials will be explored in the next chapter, these specific representations of memory which have been formulated since the signing of Armistice have shaped present day understanding of the First World War.