DOCSLIB.ORG

Anchorage Safe Communities Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Anchorage Safe Communities Final Report Institute for Circumpolar Health Studies University of Alaska Anchorage 3211 Providence Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99508 January 2001 ICHS Evaluation Team: Brian Saylor, PhD, MPH – Principal Investigator Donna Burgess, PhD Sanna Foster Carl Hild, MSci Mgt Kate Heitkamp, BS Jill Holdren, MS Carolyn Hughes, LCSW Jennifer Loudon, MPA David Marshall, MA Econ. Stacy L. Smith, MFA Spencer Zieger, PhD, MSW Anchorage Safe Communities Staff: Ron Perkins, RS, MPH - Director Diana Hudson, MPH - Program Coordinator Shelley Hokenson Tricia Lillibridge, RN Consultant Jonathan Howland, MPA, MPH, PhD Ralph Hingson, ScD Boston University School of Public Health Social and Behavioral Sciences Department This project was supported by a grant from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Grant #DTN422-97-14-15108 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 A. Process for Securing Safe Communities Demonstration Grant.................................... 1 B. Grant Objectives.......................................................................................................... 2 II. ANCHORAGE SAFE COMMUNITIES COALITION .......................................................... 3 A. Mission of Anchorage Safe Communities .................................................................... 3 B. Coalition Record Keeping........................................................................................... 3 C. Changes in Administrative Structure ........................................................................... 4 III. THE EVALUATION PLAN................................................................................................ 6 IV. ASC INTERVENTION ...................................................................................................... 7 A. Anchorage Teenagers’ Driving Attitudes and Behaviors .............................................. 7 1. Introduction and Summary.................................................................................... 7 2. Statement of the Problem ..................................................................................... 7 3. Description of the Intervention .............................................................................. 7 4. Evaluation Method................................................................................................ 8 5. Data and Interpretation ......................................................................................... 9 6. Conclusions.........................................................................................................10 B. Taking the Lead..........................................................................................................10 1. Introduction and Summary...................................................................................10 2. Intervention Description .......................................................................................11 3. Evaluation Method...............................................................................................11 4. Data and Interpretation ........................................................................................11 5. Evaluation of “Take the Lead” motivational film....................................................12 6. Teacher Evaluation of the “Take the Lead” Movie................................................12 7. Conclusions.........................................................................................................13 C. Use of Car Seats and Child Restraints .......................................................................13 1. Introduction and Summary...................................................................................13 2. Statement of the Problem ....................................................................................14 3. Description of the Intervention .............................................................................14 4. Evaluation Method...............................................................................................15 5. Data and Interpretation ........................................................................................17 6. Conclusion...........................................................................................................19 D. Reflective Wear for Pedestrians .................................................................................19 1. Introduction and Summary...................................................................................19 2. Statement of the Problem ....................................................................................20 3. Description of the Intervention .............................................................................20 4. Evaluation Method...............................................................................................21 5. Data and Interpretation ........................................................................................21 6. Conclusions.........................................................................................................23 E. Pedestrian Injury Program for School Children...........................................................24 1. Introduction and Summary...................................................................................24 2. Statement of the Problem ....................................................................................24 3. Description of the Intervention .............................................................................24 4. Evaluation Method...............................................................................................24 5. Data and Interpretation ........................................................................................25 i 6. Conclusions.........................................................................................................25 F. DWI Adjudication........................................................................................................26 1. Introduction and Summary...................................................................................26 2. Statement of the Problem ....................................................................................26 3. Description of the Intervention .............................................................................26 4. Evaluation Method...............................................................................................27 5. Data and Interpretation ........................................................................................27 6. Conclusions.........................................................................................................27 G. ASAP .........................................................................................................................27 1. Introduction and Summary...................................................................................27 2. Statement of the Problem ....................................................................................27 3. Description of the Intervention .............................................................................28 4. Evaluation Method...............................................................................................28 5. Data and Interpretation ........................................................................................29 6. Conclusions.........................................................................................................30 H. Aggressive Drivers .....................................................................................................30 1. Introduction and Summary...................................................................................30 2. Statement of the Problem ....................................................................................30 3. Description of the Intervention .............................................................................30 4. Evaluation Method...............................................................................................30 5. Data and Interpretation ........................................................................................31 6. Conclusions.........................................................................................................32 V. CONTENT ANALYSIS OF ANCHORAGE DAILY NEWS ARTICLES ............................33 A. Method for Content Analysis.......................................................................................33 1. Manifest and Latent Variables .............................................................................34 2. Definition of Text Units.........................................................................................35 3. Reliability .............................................................................................................37 4. Results ................................................................................................................37 B. Detail of Research Questions.....................................................................................38 C. Text Searches............................................................................................................39
Recommended publications
  • Local Workforce Investment Plan

    Local Workforce Investment Plan

    Local Workforce Investment Plan For the Municipality of Anchorage/Matanuska Susitna Borough Workforce Investment Area of the State of Alaska Submitted by: The Municipality of Anchorage/Matanuska-Susitna Local Workforce Investment Board Adopted by the Local Workforce Investment Board February 5, 2000 Adopted by the Alaska Human Resource Investment Council March 17, 2000 1 Table of Contents OVERVIEW AND PLAN DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...................................................................................................................................... 7 PLANNING GROUP DESCRIPTIONS................................................................................................. 8 YOUTH COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP .................................................................................................... 13 GOVERNANCE .................................................................................................................................. 15 LOCAL WORKFORCE AREA DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................... 15 GEOGRAPHY AND TRANSPORTATION .............................................................................................................. 15 POPULATION ................................................................................................................................................... 17 THE LOCAL WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD .............................................................................................
  • Inside … Environmental Health and Tribal Leaders Surveyed on Native Health Priori- Engineering Ties Puts Stimulus Page 2 Funds to Work

    Inside … Environmental Health and Tribal Leaders Surveyed on Native Health Priori- Engineering Ties Puts Stimulus Page 2 Funds to Work

    PRESORTED STANDARD Volume 12, Issue 2 U.S. POSTAGE PAID Page 1 April-June 2009 PERMIT NO. 630 Mukluk ANCHORAGE, AK Telegraph A QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER FOR THE CUSTOMER-OWNERS OF THE ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM Division of Second annual Raven’s Ball a triumph Inside … Environmental Health and Tribal leaders surveyed on Native health priori- Engineering ties puts stimulus Page 2 funds to work Alaska eHealth Network By Andrew Gildersleeve improves Alaska health- care infrastructure The American Recovery and Page 3 Reinvestment Act’s $787 billion stimulus package is helping the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium move toward our vision that Alaska Natives are the healthiest people in the world. The Raven's Ball, a gala event to benefit ANTHC’s Healthy Alaska Natives More than $60 million in Foundation, was an enormous success. Above, celebrity guest and Tlingit stimulus funds are poised to ben- storyteller Gene Tagaban performs a dance in raven regalia. See the story efit health facilities and rural san- and more photos on Pages 4-5. Photo by Wayde Carroll. itation projects statewide. Of that figure, ANTHC recently received benefit important projects that have ture are underway. Center for Climate and the go-ahead on roughly $40 mil- been stalled by coverage gaps in Dixon is optimistic about Health established lion in water and sewer sanitation state and federal regulations. “This receiving the funds soon. “We’ve Page 5 projects. allows us to fund and build projects been tracking this since it was in “Our focus is moving quickly that otherwise would have been committee,” he said.
  • Alaska Subsistence: a National Park Service Management History

    Alaska Subsistence: a National Park Service Management History

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior r»l BM vf3<Cfiiiia Kl M>WJ A National Park Service Management History • JreJTTl ^Kc fS^Tvul Katie John near her Copper River fish wheel. For more than a decade, she fought state and federal officials for the right to fish at Batzulnetas village. Four years after a landmark lawsuit reaffirmed her fishing rights, manage­ ment authority over many of Alaska's navigable waters shifted from state to federal jurisdiction. Erik Hill photo, Anchorage Daily News Alaska Subsistence A National Park Service Management History Produced by the Alaska Support Office, National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Anchorage, Alaska Author: Frank Norris September 2002 Cover photo: Inupiat woman at Shishmaref boiling walrus flip­ pers. This photo was taken in 1974 by the late Robert Belous, who was one of the primary ar­ chitects of the National Park Service's policy toward subsis­ tence management during the critical, nine-year period between the passage of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act and the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. NPS (Alaska Task Force Box 8), Photo 4467-5 Norris, Alaska Subsistence - Errata sheet Front cover - the photo subject is Fannie Kigrook Barr of Shishmaref. Title page - Frank Broderick of Archgraphics was responsible for graphics and layout, Angelika Lynch (also of Archgraphics) prepared the maps, and A.T. Publishing Co. of Anchorage printed the volume under a Government Printing Office contract, page 2 - The source for Map 1-2 is: Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska, Alaska Natives and the Land (1968), p.
  • Black History in the Last Frontier

    Black History in the Last Frontier

    Black History in the Last History Black Frontier Black History Black History in the Last Frontier provides a chronologically written narrative to encompass the history of African Americans in in the Last Frontier Alaska. Following an evocative foreword from activist and community organizer, Ed Wesley, the book begins with a discussion of black involvement in the Paciÿc whaling industry during the middle and late-nineteenth century. It then discusses how the Gold Rush and the World Wars shaped Alaska and brought thousands of black migrants to the territory. °e ÿnal chapters analyze black history in Alaska in our contemporary era. It also presents a series of biographical sketches of notable black men and women who passed through or settled in Alaska and contributed to its politics, culture, and social life. °is book highlights the achievements and contributions of Alaska’s black community, while demonstrating how these women and men have endured racism, fought injustice, and made a life and home for themselves in the forty-ninth state. Indeed, what one then ÿnds in this book is a history not well known, a history of African Americans in the last frontier. Ian C. Hartman / Ed Wesley C. Hartman Ian National Park Service by Ian C. Hartman University of Alaska Anchorage With a Foreword by Ed Wesley Black History in the Last Frontier by Ian C. Hartman With a Foreword by Ed Wesley National Park Service University of Alaska Anchorage 1 Hartman, Ian C. Black History in the Last Frontier ISBN 9780996583787 National Park Service University of Alaska Anchorage HIS056000 History / African American Printed in the United States of America Edited by Kaylene Johnson Design by David Freeman, Anchorage, Alaska.
  • Beaufort Sea Planning Area Oil and Gas Lease Sales 186, 195, and 202

    Beaufort Sea Planning Area Oil and Gas Lease Sales 186, 195, and 202

    Alaska Outer Continental Shelf OCS EIS/EA MMS 2003-001 Beaufort Sea Planning Area Oil and Gas Lease Sales 186, 195, and 202 Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume II (Section VII, Bibliography, Index) B w e o a r r u a fo B rt Sea t le n I e s a e D h it m y S a B Cape Halkett H arriso n Bay ay oe B rudh Colville Delta P Kaktovik Nuiqsut NPR - A Deadhorse C A ANWR U N . A S D . A BEAUFORT SEA PLANNING AREA OIL AND GAS LEASE SALES 186, 195, AND 202 Final Environmental Impact Statement OCS EIS/EA, MMS 2003-001, in 4 volumes: Volume I, Executive Summary, Sections I through VI Volume II, Section VII, Bibliography, Index Volume III, Tables, Figures, and Maps for Volumes I and II Volume IV, Appendices The summary is also available as a separate document: Executive Summary, MMS 2003-002. The complete EIS is available on CD-ROM (MMS 2003-001 CD) and on the Internet (http://www.mms.gov/alaska/cproject/Beafort Sea/). This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not intended, nor should it be used, as a local planning document by potentially affected communities. The exploration, development and production, and transportation scenarios described in this EIS represent best-estimate assumptions that serve as a basis for identifying characteristic activities and any resulting environmental effects. Several years will elapse before enough is known about potential local details of development to permit estimates suitable for local planning. These assumptions do not represent a Minerals Management Service recommendation, preference, or endorsement of any facility, site, or development plan.
  • Peter Dunlap-Shohl, Anchorage Daily News Dunlap-Shohl Political Cartoon Collection, Anchorage Museum, B2009.017

    Peter Dunlap-Shohl, Anchorage Daily News Dunlap-Shohl Political Cartoon Collection, Anchorage Museum, B2009.017

    REFERENCE CODE: AkAMH REPOSITORY NAME: Anchorage Museum at Rasmuson Center Bob and Evangeline Atwood Alaska Resource Center 625 C Street Anchorage, AK 99501 Phone: 907-929-9235 Fax: 907-929-9233 Email: [email protected] Guide prepared by: Sara Piasecki, Archivist TITLE: Anchorage Daily News Dunlap-Shohl Political Cartoon Collection COLLECTION NUMBER: B2009.017 OVERVIEW OF THE COLLECTION Dates: circa 1982-2008 Extent: 19 boxes; 19 linear feet Language and Scripts: The collection is in English. Name of creator(s): Peter Dunlap-Shohl Administrative/Biographical History: Peter Dunlap-Shohl drew political cartoons for the Anchorage Daily News for over 25 years. In 2008, he won the Howard Rock Tom Snapp First Amendment Award from the Alaska Press Club. Scope and Content Description: The collection contains the original artwork for Peter Dunlap-Shohl’s editorial cartoons, published in the Anchorage Daily News (ADN) circa 1982-2008, as well as unfinished and unpublished cartoons. The original strips from the first year of Dunlap-Shohl’s comic, Muskeg Heights, are also included; the strip ran in the ADN from April 23, 1990 to October 16, 2004. The majority of works are pen-and-ink drawings, with a smaller number of pencil sketches, watercolors, scratchboard engravings, and computer-generated art. Cartoons created after about 2004 were born digital; the collection includes digital files of cartoons dated from February 1, 2005-October 5, 2008. Some born-digital cartoons are only available in paper copies. The collection also includes some examples of original graphic art created by Dunlap- Shohl for specific projects; these are generally undated and oversized.
  • Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made from the Original Document

    Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made from the Original Document

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 468 839 RC 023 692 TITLE Racism's Frontier: The Untold Story of Discrimination and Division in Alaska. INSTITUTION Alaska State Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. PUB DATE 2002-04-00 NOTE 68p. AVAILABLE FROM For full text: http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/aksac02/ ak02.pdf. PUB TYPE Information Analyses (070) Reports Evaluative (142) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Academic Achievement; *Alaska Natives; American Indian Education; *Educational Needs; Elementary Secondary Education; *Equal Education; *Equal Opportunities (Jobs); Government Role; Indigenous Personnel; Justice; Law Enforcement; *Racial Discrimination; *Rural Urban Differences; Self Determination; Trust Responsibility (Government) IDENTIFIERS *Alaska; State Tribal Relationship; Subsistence Lifestyle ABSTRACT In response to an incident in which White teenagers shot Alaska Natives with frozen paintballs, the Alaska State Advisory Committee (SAC) to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights hosted a 2-day community forum in Anchorage. The forum solicited input about improving race relations from state, local, and federal officials, representatives of advocacy groups and community organizations, and Alaska residents, and focused on education, employment, and the administration of justice. The SAC also obtained input specifically from Alaska Natives in a day-long session at the annual Conference of the Alaska Federation of Natives. Civil rights issues unique to Alaska include an urban/rural divide, with residents of remote rural villages (predominantly Native Alaskans) often receiving inferior state and federal services, if any at all; rural subsistence lifestyles based on access to natural resources; and local control of natural resources through tribal self-governance. A chapter on educational issues covers racial disparities in achievement, lack of teacher diversity and cultural integration, and inadequate funding for rural schools.
  • Alaska Fish Factor

    Alaska Fish Factor

    Fort relic discovered on burn pile - page 7 Chilkat park cabin overnights? - page 6 Serving Haines and Klukwan, Alaska since 1966 Chilkat Valley News Volume XLIV Number 32 Thursday, August 14, 2014 $1 VETERANS MOVE IN DOWNTOWN Assembly flip-flops on tour moratorium Says it may deter cruise ships By Karen Garcia complete information” when she A moratorium on Chilkoot voted for the moratorium, and that River corridor tour permits ended she felt the borough “may have Tuesday after the Haines Borough overstepped our boundary” by Assembly reversed its July 29 trying to manage state property. decision and issued a canoe The July 29 public hearing tour permit to Alaska Mountain on the AMG permit application Guides. drew comments from several The assembly voted 4-2 to tour operators supporting reconsider the motion passed the moratorium. Tuesday’s at the July 29 meeting, which reconsideration came without postponed action on the AMG public notice. AMG owner Sean permit and placed a moratorium Gaffney was the only member on Chilkoot River corridor of the public to comment on the permits until a management plan reconsideration. addressing carrying capacity is Assembly members defended established for the area. the reconsideration as a last- Assembly members Joanne minute decision, though manager Waterman and Debra Schnabel David Sosa sent an email to opposed the reversal of the assembly members at 8 a.m. moratorium and issuance of the Tuesday recommending the AMG permit. moratorium “be lifted at the Haines Assisted Living community relations coordinator Tara Bicknell, left, speaks with Sally Lix at Schnabel balked at the earliest opportunity.” the Soboleff-McRae Veterans Village building this week.
  • July 24 2014 NJUS Grapples with Rising Power Generation Costs by Sandra L

    July 24 2014 NJUS Grapples with Rising Power Generation Costs by Sandra L

    Photo by Diana Haecker FRESH AND NATURAL— Fish hang to dry on a rack at the beach overlooking Grantley Harbor. Protection of the sensitive area was the mission of an oil spill drill last week. C VOLUME CXIV NO. 30 July 24 2014 NJUS grapples with rising power generation costs By Sandra L. Medearis a raise of two cents. However, fac- Berda Willson, board chairwoman The Nome Joint Utility System toring in lower cost fuel already on observed. board voted to increase the fuel sur- hand plus a rebate for fuel that tested charge on oil it is feeding into its below BTU values in the 2013 sup- Fewer kilowatt sold generators to light the town. ply lowered the average total cost per The revenue from kwh sales was At a penny a kilowatt, the increase gallon to $3.5387, halving the in- already down from 2013 by 10 per- slated for the July billing will take crease to one cent per gallon. cent, Handeland said Monday. A ratepayers’ costs up by $5 per 500 The board approved the increase major impact occurred when Rock kilowatts. July 16, but they were degrees cooler Creek Mine shut. A comparison of Sagging revenue numbers tell him than lukewarm on the issue. The ris- figures for January to June 30, year that Nome Joint Utility System ing cost of electric power has them on year, showed that, although the needs to raise the fuel surcharge to stymied. mine did not operate last year, main- the extent allowed by the current The board held their own feet to tenance, running pumps and the like, NJUS tariff, said John K.
  • Alaska Advisory Committee to the US Commission on Civil Rights

    Alaska Advisory Committee to the US Commission on Civil Rights

    Alaska Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Racism’s Frontier: The Untold Story of Discrimination and Division in Alaska April 2002 A fact-finding report of the Alaska Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights prepared for the information and consideration of the Commission. Statements and recommendations in this report should not be attributed to the Commission, but only to participants at the community forums or to the Advisory Committee. The United States Commission on Civil Rights The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, bipartisan agency established by Congress in 1957, reconstituted in 1983, and reauthorized in 1994. It is directed to investigate complaints alleging that citizens are being deprived of their right to vote by reason of their race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices; study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice; appraise federal laws and policies with respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice; serve as a national clearinghouse for information in respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin; submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress; and issue public service announcements to discourage discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws.
  • Municipality of Anchorage

    Municipality of Anchorage

    Municipality of Anchorage Approved Rick Mystrom Mayor General Government Operating Budget 2000 P.O. Box 196650 Municipality Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6650 Telephone: (907) 343-4431 Fax: (907) 343-4499 of http://www.ci.anchorage.ak.us Anchorage Rick Mystrom, Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR December 17, 1999 Dear Residents of Anchorage: Enclosed is the approved 2000 General Government Operating Budget I am pleased to report that the 2000 budget calls for no increase in property taxes for Municipal services on 1999 existing property if there are no further cuts in State revenues during the 2000 legislative session. Should the legislature pass on further cuts to Anchorage, this will result in increased taxes. The Municipality responded to reductions to State revenues made earlier this year by eliminating a planned reduction in 1999 property taxes, saving part of the 1999 budget, and reducing the 2000 budget including the elimination of 40 permanent positions. In the 2000 budget we have added 15 new firefighters and 15 new police officers. Voter-approved debt service has increased by $3.8 million. Even with such high priority increases, the 2000 budget is $2.8 million below the 1999 budget Crime in Anchorage has continued its dramatic decline, our citywide cleanup and beautification efforts continue, the economy is growing and becoming much more diversified, and our future is healthy. We will work to continue the safer city trend by maintaining the appropriate quality and quantity of Anchorage police officers, keeping our police department connected with the community, keeping the community involved in public safety issues, and keeping up the momentum for a cleaner city.
  • Aml Past Presidents

    Aml Past Presidents

    Alaska Municipal League 65th Annual Local Government Conference Navigating Through Rough Waters November 18-20, 2015 ~ Anchorage, AK 2015 CONFERENCE SPONSORS GOLD SPONSOR ORRICK SILVER SPONSOR Alaska Airlines CH2M AML Joint Insurance Association BRONZE SPONSOR Alaska Housing Finance Corporation Alaska Permanent Capital Management CLIA Alaska Key Bank SUPPORTING SPONSOR City & Borough of Juneau Boyd, Chandler & Falconer, LLP Elgee Rehfeld Mertz, LLC Exerplay, Inc. DOWL NC Machinery Alaska Railroad Corporation Cover photo courtesy of Shawn Myers/AML Juneau Anchorage, Alaska - November 18-20, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Alaska Municipal League Conference Sponsors........................................inside front cover Municipality of Anchorage Welcome.......................................................................................4 Alaska Municipal League President Welcome........................................................................5 Alaska Conference of Mayors President Welcome.................................................................6 Alaska Municipal League Executive Director Welcome........................................................7 Alaska Municipal League/Alaska Conference of Mayors Mission Statements......................8 Alaska Municipal League Board of Directors & Staff.............................................................9 Alaska Municipal League Organization........................................................................10 & 11 General Conference Information..................................................................................12