Town of Jupiter

TOWN OF JUPITER

DATE: July 28, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of Town Council THRU: Andrew D. Lukasik, Town Manager

FROM: John Sickler, Director of Planning and Zoning

SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT TO:

• Modify an objective and policies to update task completion dates; • Update Tables 2-4 and replace Figures 5-7 to reflect changes to the local roadway adopted level of service standards; • Update Figure 3 “Sidewalk/Pedestrian Facilities;” • Replace Figure 4 “The Bicycle Transportation Master Plan.” (PZ #08-290)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Staff Update (July 28, 2009) - Staff has modified Transportation Element Table 4 (Future-Year Conditions 2030) and corresponding Figure 7 (2030 Level of Service Map) to reduce projected daily and peak-hour traffic volumes on Longshore Drive between Northfork Boulevard and Central Boulevard. These changes are recommended by staff because the current projected daily and peak-hour volumes on Longshore Drive are abnormally high, given the area is built-out and the dead-end nature of this road segment.

Staff initiated the proposed amendments to Transportation Element Objective 3.6 and implementing Policies 3.6.1 - 3.6.3 to correctly reference the current round of Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan Amendments. On June 25, 2009, the Town postponed its Indiantown Road Corridor Constrained Roadway At Lower Levels of Service (CRALLS) text amendment from County’s Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The revised amendments provide flexibility for the application of future traffic mitigation measures without requiring additional short term Comprehensive Plan amendments. The updates to Transportation Element Tables 2 - 4 and Figures 5 - 7 are related to the adoption of the Local Roadway LOS standard in the Town Code. The changes are based on the evaluation methodology (see Attachment A of staff report), geometric characteristics of some roadways, and the K factor, which converts the estimated peak hour two-way traffic volume to the daily volume for some roadways. The proposed changes to Figure 3 and the replacement of Figure 4 add and delete sidewalks and multi-use facilities along Town roads.

Staff finds the proposed Transportation Element text changes consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Town’s Comprehensive Plan and therefore recommends approval of the proposed amendments.

RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Commission - At the April 14, 2009 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval (by a 7-0 vote) of the Transportation Element text amendments to the Town Council, as recommended by staff.

Strategic Priority: Improved Mobility Within Jupiter

Attachments: Staff Report Ordinance No. 5-09

TOWN OF JUPITER TOWN MANAGER’S OFFICE

DATE: July 28, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of Town Council THRU: Andrew D. Lukasik, Town Manager

FROM: John Sickler, Director of Planning and Zoning

SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT TO:

• MODIFY AN OBJECTIVE AND POLICIES TO UPDATE TASK COMPLETION DATES; • UPDATE TABLES 2-4 AND REPLACE FIGURES 5-7 TO REFLECT CHANGES TO THE LOCAL ROADWAY ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS; • UPDATE FIGURE 3 “SIDEWALK/PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES;” • REPLACE FIGURE 4 “THE BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN.”

Ord. #5-09 Meeting PZ 04/14/09 - (acting as LPA) PZ# 08-290 dates: TC 07/21/09 – 1st Reading (Continued)) DMK TC 08/06/09 – 1st Reading (Transmittal) TC TBA – 2nd Reading (Adoption)

Applicant: Town of Jupiter Request: Amendments to the Transportation Element to: • update task completion dates, update tables and replace figures to reflect changes to the Local Roadway adopted Level of Service (LOS) standards; • update Figure 3; • replace Figure 4.

Staff Update (July 28, 2009).

Staff recommends additional changes to Transportation Element Table 4 (Future-Year Conditions 2030) and corresponding Figure 7 (2030 Level of Service Map) to modify the projected daily and peak hour traffic volumes on Longshore Drive between Northfork Drive and Central Boulevard. Staff has reviewed the output from the long range traffic distribution model, which was utilized to create the projections in Table 4. The review concluded that the projected daily and peak-hour volumes on Longshore Drive between Northfork Drive and Central Boulevard were abnormally high, given the dead-end nature of this road segment. The road does not provide any connectivity to the north (Martin County) and only serves the Shores and nearby residential neighborhoods. Further, a review of the area indicates there are no remaining vacant residential properties; the area is built-out. Table 2 (Existing Conditions 2007) indicates 2009-01 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Transportation Element Text Page 2

4,674 daily trips are assigned to Longshore Drive. The current projected 2030 daily volume for Longshore Drive is 8,189. This volume includes a peak-year adjustment added on to the original distribution model output of 6,229 trips. The only likely factors that could contribute to an increase in traffic trips by 2030 include increased household size and changes in commuting patterns. Given the area is built-out and Longshore Drive is a dead-end road, staff recommends reducing the existing 2030 projected daily volume from 8,189 trips to 6,229 and the corresponding peak-hour volume from 778 trips to 592. The proposed reductions to the 2030 daily and peak-hour projections will raise the level of service standard on Longshore Drive from C to B for both. These adjustments to Longshore Drive have been added to proposed Table 4 and corresponding Figure in Exhibit “A” of Ordinance #5-09.

Staff Update (July 13, 2009).

The original intent of the proposed text amendments to Transportation Element Objective 3.6 and implementing Policies 3.6.1 through 3.6.3 was to update them to be consistent with the concurrent Indiantown Road Corridor CRALLS text amendments being processed as part of the County’s 09-2 round of Comprehensive Plan amendments. Following the LPA hearing on April 14, 2009, the Town postponed the proposed CRALLS amendment to a future round of County amendments. Given this action, staff recommends approval of changes to the text amendments for Transportation Element Objective 3.6 and implementing Policies 3.6.1 through 3.6.3. The changes as indicated in a strike-through and underline format, will provide the flexibility to initiate a future CRALLS amendment or other mitigation strategies without having to amend the Town’s Comprehensive Plan in the near term:

Objective 3.6 By July 2009, Tthe Town shall approve a Corridor Master Plan to continue to implement the mitigation strategies of the Jupiter Area Study for the Indiantown Road Corridor and/or the strategies contained in Transportation Element Policy 3.2.8 to reduce future traffic congestion. and The Town shall continue to coordinate with Palm Beach County and FDOT to implement the mitigation strategies.

Policy 3.6.1 Traffic conditions contained in for the Indiantown Road Corridor Master Plan shall be based on the buildout conditions assumed in the Jupiter Area Study.

Policy 3.6.2 The Town shall coordinate with Palm Beach County to implement mitigation strategies for adopt the Indiantown Road Corridor Master Plan Ordinance , which shall may include the following:

a) Adopted LOS standards and a methodology for transportation concurrency review and approval for developments impacting the Corridor. b) A methodology to manage the following Jupiter Area Study mitigation strategies for developments determined to have impacts within the Corridor: 1) Roadway construction including new facilities, additional lanes and intersection improvements; 2) Land use – acquisition for open space use and floor area ratio standards for industrial, office and retail uses; and 3) transportation demand management; c) A public notification process; d) A variance and appeal process; and e) An intergovernmental coordination process that provides for the management of the Indiantown Road Corridor Master Plan with Palm Beach County.

2009-01 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Transportation Element Text Page 3

Policy 3.6.3 The Indiantown Road Corridor mitigation strategies Master Plan shall be jointly administered by the Town and Palm Beach County, as applicable.

In addition, since the CRALLS text amendment will not be included in the current round of County Comprehensive Plan amendments, staff recommends work on the proposed traffic mitigation fee study by Dr. Nicholas from the University of Florida be suspended, unless otherwise directed to proceed by the Town Council.

Finally, staff recommends approval the following additional changes to the proposed Figure 4 “Bicycle Transportation Master Plan” (Attachment B), that were identified after the LPA hearing:

• Delete the proposed shared use path between Heights Blvd and Indian Creek Parkway. Due to budget constraints, priorities and what may be technical issues with the canal hazard, this path will be a challenge. Further, with parallel facilities existing in Abacoa, it does not seem to be a high priority or critical link.

• Delete bicycle lanes on Palmfield Way. The lanes on a small portion of Palmfield Way were deleted as staff is also recommending to delete the bike lanes on Pine Tree Trail. With the volume of traffic on Palmfield Way, residents can safely share the road.

The updated Figure 4 is included with Exhibit “A” of Ordinance #5-09.

Local Planning Agency (LPA) Recommendation (April 14, 2009).

At the April 14, 2009 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission (acting as the LPA) unanimously recommended approval (by a 7-0 vote) of the Transportation Element text amendments, as recommended by staff, without any modifications.

Staff Recommendation.

Based upon the facts and findings contained herein, staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission, acting as the Towns’ Local Planning Agency (LPA), recommend that the Town Council Adopt the proposed Comprehensive Plan text amendments to the Transportation Element as follows (as shown in a strike-through and underline format):

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Objective 2.2. Develop a safe bicycle and pedestrian transportation system accessible to all major public and private facilities.

Policy 2.2.1 Maintain and Uupdate as necessary by July 2009 the Town’s adopted Bicycle Transportation Master Plan. The plan will be integrated into the goals, objectives and policies of any mass-transit plans and Transit Oriented Development (TOD) plans.

Objective 3.1. The Town should identify existing and future State, County and Town roadway deficiencies based on the standards adopted in this plan in conjunction with the Town’s adopted 5-year Community Investment Program and budgeting. This objective will be accomplished through an annual report based on biennial traffic counts.

Policy 3.1.2 By October 2008, Tthe Town shall maintain adopt the following adopted LOS standards for all Town maintained roadways:

2009-01 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Transportation Element Text Page 4

a) Peak-hour two-way - LOS D b) Daily - LOS C c) Intersection - LOS D Objective 3.6 By July February 200910, the Town shall approve a Corridor Master Plan to implement the mitigation strategies of the Jupiter Area Study for the Indiantown Road Corridor to reduce traffic congestion through a Palm Beach County CRALLS1 designation and associated changes to the County’s Traffic Performance Standards. and The Town will continue to coordinate with Palm Beach County and FDOT to implement the mitigation strategies.

Policy 3.6.1 Traffic conditions contained in the Indiantown Road Corridor Master Plan CRALLS shall be based on the buildout conditions assumed in the Jupiter Area Study.

Policy 3.6.2 The Town shall coordinate with Palm Beach County to adopt the Indiantown Road Corridor Master Plan Ordinance CRALLS, which shall include the following:

a) Adopted LOS standards and a methodology for transportation concurrency review and approval for developments impacting the Corridor. b) A methodology to manage the following Jupiter Area Study mitigation strategies for developments determined to have impacts within the Corridor: 1. Roadway construction including new facilities, additional lanes and intersection improvements; 2. Land use – acquisition for open space use and floor area ratio standards for industrial, office and retail uses; and 3. transportation demand management; c) A public notification process; d) A variance and appeal process; and e) An intergovernmental coordination process that provides for the management of the Indiantown Road Corridor Master Plan CRALLS with Palm Beach County.

Policy 3.6.3 The Indiantown Road Corridor Master Plan CRALLS shall be jointly administered by the Town and Palm Beach County.

Amendments (in a strike-through and underline format) to Tables 2 through 4, Figure 3 and the replacement of Figures 4-7 are shown in Exhibit A of Ordinance #5-09.

Analysis.

Amendment B – Text

Location: Transportation Element (see DCA Exhibit A)

A. Supporting Data and Analysis

1. Text Change to Policy 2.2.1 – The Bicycle Transportation Master Plan is being updated as part of this amendment. The proposed changes to Policy 2.2.1 reflect the concurrent replacement of Figure 4. 2. Text Change to Policy 3.1.2 – In October 2008, the Town adopted Local Roadway LOS standards in the Town Code. Policy 3.1.2 is now being updated to reflect this change.

1 Constrained Roadway At a Lower Level of Service (CRALLS).

2009-01 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Transportation Element Text Page 5

3. Text Changes to Objective 3.6 and Policies 3.6.1 through 3.6.3 – As part of its 2009- 1 round of Comprehensive Plan amendments, Palm Beach County is proposing to eliminate Corridor Master Plans. Therefore, the Town is now proposing a Constrained Roadway At a Lower Level of Service (CRALLS) for the Indiantown Road Corridor as part of the County’s 2009-2 round of Comprehensive Plan amendments to implement the mitigation strategies of the Jupiter Area Study. The amendments to Objective 3.6 are necessary to reflect the switch from a Corridor Master Plan to a CRALLS. Associated with the implementation of the CRALLS, the Town is proposing modification of the County’s Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) for the Indiantown Road Corridor. Reference of the TPS modification was included in Objective 3.6. Changes to Policies 3.6.1 through 3.6.3 reflect the switch from a Corridor Master Plan to a CRALLS.

4. Changes to Figure 3 “Sidewalk/Pedestrian Facilities – The following changes are shown on Figure 3:

• Added Jupiter Park Drive; • Added the proposed southern extension of Island Way; • Added Bush Road; • Added the portion of the completed multi-use path between Pennock Lane and Military Trail (north of Indian Creek Parkway); • Added Dakota Drive; • Added the Town Boundary on the figure.

5. Replacement of Figure 4 “Bicycle Transportation Master Plan” – The following changes are shown on the proposed Figure 4:

• Added Palmfield Way; • Added multiuse plan from Indian Creek Parkway to Heights Boulevard; • Added southern extension of Island Way roadway with paved shoulders; • Deleted Main Street from Central Boulevard to University Boulevard; • Deleted Quarry Knoll Road; • Deleted South Caloosahatchee Drive; • Enhanced map to discern between existing and future shared use paths, existing and future paved shoulders, and existing and future designated bike lanes; • Updated to completed status - Bush Road, Dakota Drive, Ocean Boulevard north of Indiantown Road to Jupiter Beach Road, South Pennock Lane, Indian Creek Parkway, Maplewood Drive north of Toney Penna Drive, Donald Ross Road, Indiantown Road, Palmwood Road and Frederick Small Road east of Alternate A1A; • Revised future facility type designation (from Long-Term Route Network to Multi-Use) on Toney Penna Drive and Heights Boulevard. • Delete the Long-Term Route Network on Loxahatchee Drive (north and south) because of budgetary concerns and the fact that sidewalks currently exist along all of Loxahatchee Drive. • Delete the Long-Term Route Network on Pinetree Trail (in the Loxahatchee Club development) because of budgetary concerns and the extra cost associated with having to relocate existing trees to complete the path.

2009-01 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Transportation Element Text Page 6

6. Local Roadway Adopted LOS Standard Changes to Tables 2 through 4 - The proposed changes to the adopted LOS service volume standards as shown in Tables 2 through 4 are based on the modifications made in: • The evaluation methodology of the level of service volume standards as adopted in Section 27-1710 (Traffic Performance Standards) of the Town code (see Attachment B); • Geometric characteristics of some roadways; and • The K factor which converts the estimated peak hour two-way traffic volume to the daily volume for some roadways.

To be specific, the changes in the evaluation methodology are twofold:

• The lane-width/shoulder-width adjustment factor was adjusted downward with a factor of the Posted Speed Limit (PSL) divided by 55 mph. This change was made because it was found, through actual observations, that the speed reduction is in general less on the roadways with lower PSL. • The median type adjustment factor was modified for an undivided two-lane road which did not include an exclusive left-turn lane. The adjustment was made to reflect the effect the number of left-turn access points would have on road speed reduction. The more access points that exist, the higher the speed reduction. The same effect on an undivided four-lane road is less significant due to the fact that drivers could bypass the vehicle waiting to turn left by passing on the outer lane.

7. Replacement of Figures 5 through 7 – The numerical changes to some of the adopted LOS standards in Tables 2 through 4 resulted in letter (A through F) changes for the 2007, 2012 and 2030 Peak hour traffic count conditions. The letter changes noted on revised Tables 2 through 4 are denoted on proposed replacement Figures 5 through 7.

B. Internal Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan

The proposed text amendments are internally consistent and supportive of the following objectives and policies of the current Comprehensive Plan: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Objective 1.1. Common transportation goals, objectives, and policies shall be shared on an on-going basis with the transportation-related agencies listed in Goal l, where common interests are involved.

Staff Comment: - The proposed amendments to Transportation Objective 3.6 and its implementing Policies 3.6.1 through 3.6.3 reflect the shift from the corridor master plan approach to a CRALLS to implement the Indiantown Road Corridor Master Plan in coordination with the County’s current round of Comprehensive Plan amendments, which is consistent with the intent of this objective.

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT

Policy 1.1.18 The Town shall review existing goals, objectives and policies of other agencies when revising or altering Jupiter's goals, objectives and policies.

2009-01 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Transportation Element Text Page 7

Staff Comment: - The proposed amendments to Transportation Objective 3.6 and its implementing Policies 3.6.1 through 3.6.3 have been coordinated with Palm Beach County, which is consistent with the intent of Policy 1.1.18.

C. Intergovernmental Coordination

A summary of the Transportation Element text amendments was distributed to local governmental entities by the Palm Beach County Interlocal Plan Amendment Review Committee (IPARC) on March 30, 2009. A copy of the staff report for the Transportation Element text amendments was sent to Planning Division staff from the City of Palm Beach Gardens. There have been no comments or objections concerning the amendments from any other governmental agency.

The data and analysis supporting these text amendments will be included in the transmittal package sent to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA).

Conclusion

Staff finds that the proposed comprehensive plan text amendments are consistent with the comprehensive plan, and are supported by data and analysis; therefore, staff recommends approval of the amendments proposed in Exhibit "A.”

Attachments:

Attachment A – Section 27-1710 (Traffic Performance Standards) of the Town Code Attachment B – Figure 4 version reviewed by Local Planning Agency

K:\Staff\WP51\COMPPLAN\Amendments\2009-01\TE Text - Update Figs & Tables\Staff Report 3 (PZ 08-289 DMK).doc

Attachment A

Sec. 27-1710. Determination of service volume standards.

(a) The following methodology, look-up tables, and calculation procedure are provided hereinafter to determine the adopted level of service volume standards on Town thoroughfares given roadway characteristics including posted speed limit, lane width, shoulder width, median type, access density, sidewalk and bikelane coverage, intensity of signalized, two-way, all-way stop controlled intersections and/or traffic calming devices. An applicant for a new development or redevelopment may use this procedure to propose the necessary roadway improvements to meet the transportation concurrency requirements if roadway capacity deficiencies are determined to be an issue in the applicant’s traffic study. The increase in service volume as estimated from this methodology due to the proposed roadway improvements could also be used to determine the proportionate fair share of the contribution from the applicant. Upon roadway improvements being committed, the adopted level of service standards established in the Comprehensive Plan may be amended, at the discretion of the Town Council, based on the methodology specified in this Section.

(b) The volume standards are primarily established for peak hour directional traffic based on the volume-to-capacity ratio and maximum density designated at each level of service in the following table, and then converted to peak hour two-way as well as AADT using the K (conversion factor from AADT to peak hourly volume) and D (directional) factors. Note that the service volume standards greater than D would become F in some instances if intersection capacities have been reached. The calculation procedure can also be implemented using a worksheet program provided by the Town Engineering office.

Level of Service A B C D E Volume-to-capacity 0.22 0.35 0.55 0.73 0.92 ratio Max. density (vpmpl) 11 18 26 35 45 Peak-hour directional S × max. density × no of lanes service volume (vph) avg Peak-hour two-way Average peak-hour directional service volume (vph) service volume divided by D Peak-hour two-way service AADT standards volume divided by K

(1) The average running speed, Savg, is determined based on the free-flow speed and the effect of signal/stop controls/calming devices as follows: −1 ⎡ 4 ⎤ 1 dn ii S = ⎢ + ∑i=1 ⎥ (mph) avg ⋅ FFSk 3600 ⎣⎢ ⎦⎥ where FFS = Free-flow speed (mph); k = FFS adjustment factor (=1 for LOS A through C; =0.97 for LOS D; =0.93 for LOS E) ni = number of signal/stop controls/calming devices per mile (i = 1, 2, 3, 4 for signal, two-way stop, all-way stop, and calming devices); and di = average signal/stop control/calming device delay (sec/veh). (2) The free-flow speed (FFS) is calculated by subtracting speed reductions due to lane- width/ shoulder, median, access density, and coverage of sidewalk/bikelane from the based free-flow speed (BFFS) in the following fashion: FFS = BFFS – fW – fM – fA– fB (mph) where fW = Lane-width adjustment factor; fM = Median type adjustment factor; fA = Access density adjustment factor; and fB = Sidewalk/bikelane adjustment factor. In practice, BFFS is usually assumed as 5 mph over the posted speed limit (PSL), i.e., BFFS = PSL+5. The K and D factor is defaulted as 0.095 and 0.55 unless appropriate evidences from a local study or survey are employed to justify the use of different design values. The adjustment factors are described as follows:

a. Lane-width/shoulder width adjustment factor fW = tabulated speed reduction*PSL/55 Lane Shoulder Width (ft) Width (ft) <2 ≥2 - 4 ≥4 - 6 ≥6 9 - 10 6.4 4.8 3.5 2.2 ≥10 - 11 5.3 3.7 2.4 1.1 ≥11 - 12 4.7 3.0 1.7 0.4 ≥12 4.2 2.6 1.3 0 (Source: tabulated speed reductions are taken from HCM 2000)

b. Median type adjustment factor (fM) Median Type fM Undivided (2 lane road) 1.6 + 0.9*(n-1)* Undivided (4 lane road) 0.8 Two-way left-turn lane 0 Divided 0 Note:*n is number of left-turn access points per mile without exclusive turn lane or divided median. If the number of access points is greater than 3 per mile, n = 3.

c. Access density adjustment factor (fA = 0.25*Access Density) Access Density (per mile) fA 0 0 10 2.5 20 5 ≥ 32 8 Note: Access density refers to no. of influencing driveways/on-street parking per mile on right-side of travel direction if roadway is divided; otherwise access points from both sides should be counted. (Source: HCM 2000) d. Sidewalk/bikelane/shared-path adjustment factor (fB) fB = fB1 + fB2 or fB3 (assumed the existence of shared-use path is exclusive from sidewalk/bikelane), where fB1, fB2, fB3 are adjustment factor for bikelane, sidewalk, and shared-use path, respectively. Coverage of f f f bikelane/sidewalk B1 B2 B3 85% or more 0 0 0 50% - 85% 0.9 0.4 1.1 Less than 50% 1.7 0.7 2.0 2

(3) The average signal/stop control/calming device delay, d1 through d4, should be determined based on the most recently published HCM methodology as follows:

a. The signalized intersection delay can be determined as: C − λ)1( 2 ⎛ 16x ⎞ PFd ⋅= ⎜ xx )1(1225 2 +−+−⋅+ ⎟ (sec) 1 ⎜ ⎟ − λx)1(2 ⎝ c ⎠ where PF=progression adjustment factor (default =1.0, poor=1.2, good=0.8); C = cycle length (= 120 sec as default); λ = effective green time to cycle ratio (= 0.41 as default); x = volume-to-capacity ratio (= 0.22, 0.35, 0.55, 0.73, and 0.92 for LOS A, B, C, D, and E); and c = capacity (= 1710⋅λ as default).

b. The intersection delay for two-way stop control can be determined as follows: 3600 ⎛ 32x ⎞ d ⎜ xx )1(1225 2 +−+−⋅+= ⎟ + 5 (sec) 2 ⎜ ⎟ c ⎝ c ⎠ ev − tv cc 3600/ where c = capacity (vph) = c ; 1− e − tv fc 3600/ vc = total conflicting volume (= 300 vph as default, since all-way stop control might be warranted if vc exceeds 300 vph); tc = critical gap (= 4 sec as default); and tf = follow-up time (= 2.5 sec as default).

c. The intersection delay for all-way stop control can be determined as follows: ⎛ xh ⎞ ⎜ xxthd )1(1225 2 +−+−⋅+−= d ⎟ + 5 (sec) 3 md ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ 5.112 ⎠ where hd = departure headway (= 5.5 sec and 6.5 sec for one-lane and two-lane approach); and tm = move-up time (= 2 sec as default).

d. Delay due to traffic calming devices can be calculated based on the speed differential between FFS and the regulatory speed limit for the calming devices (denoted as sc in mph). Assuming the driver decelerates from FFS to sc (defaulted as 20 mph) at comfortable deceleration rate, a, of 11.2 ft/s2 when approaching the calming device, passes through the device in 0.5 sec, and then accelerates to resume FFS at the same acceleration rate. The delay can then be calculated as:

− sFFS )(93.2 − sFFS 22 )(73.0 d = c 5.0 −+ c (sec) 4 a ⋅ FFSa

ORDINANCE NO. 5-09

AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF JUPITER, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 57-89, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE TOWN OF JUPITER AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT TO MODIFY AN OBJECTIVE AND POLICIES; PROVIDING FOR UPDATED TASK COMPLETION DATES; PROVIDING FOR AN UPDATE OF TABLES 2 THROUGH 4 AND FIGURES 5 THROUGH 7 TO REFLECT CHANGES TO LOCAL ROADWAY ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS; PROVIDING FOR AN UPDATE TO FIGURE 3 ILLUSTRATING “SIDEWALK/PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF FIGURE 4 “THE BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN;” PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF LAWS IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Jupiter, Florida, has adopted a

Comprehensive Plan for the Town of Jupiter pursuant to the "Local Government Comprehensive

Planning and Land Development Regulation Act" (the Act); and,

WHEREAS, the Town’s Comprehensive Plan has been determined to be “in compliance” with the Act; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Jupiter Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the Local Planning Agency (the LPA) has conducted a public hearing, as required by Section

163.3174(4)(a), Florida Statutes, to consider amendments to the text of the Transportation

Element of the Comprehensive Plan to modify an objective and polices; to update task Ordinance No. 5-09 Page B

completion dates; to update Tables 2 - 4 and Figures 5 - 7 to reflect changes to local roadway adopted level of service standards; to update Figure 3 “sidewalk/pedestrian facilities and; to replace Figure 4 “ The Bicycle Transportation Master Plan;” and,

WHEREAS, the LPA has recommended the amendments, as set forth in the attached

Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein; and,

WHEREAS, the Town Council has determined the amendments of the Town's

Comprehensive Plan would be internally consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan and in compliance with the Act; and,

WHEREAS, the Jupiter Town Council has conducted its transmittal public hearing pursuant to Section 163.3184(15), F.S.; and has transmitted the proposed plan amendments to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for its review.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE

TOWN OF JUPITER, FLORIDA:

Section 1. The whereas clauses are incorporated herein as the legislative findings of the Town Council.

Section 2. Ordinance No. 57-89 of the Town of Jupiter, entitled "Comprehensive

Plan of the Town of Jupiter," is hereby amended as provided in the attached Exhibit "A", which is incorporated herein.

Section 3. The Town Clerk is hereby directed to transmit the required copies of the proposed comprehensive plan amendments to the Department of Community Affairs and all other parties pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), F.S.

Section 4. Severability. If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is for any reason held by a court to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding shall not affect the remainder of this Ordinance. Ordinance No. 5-09 Page C

Section 5. Repeal of Laws in Conflict. All ordinances or part of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.

Section 6. Effective Date. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become effective pursuant to Section 163.3189(2)(a), F.S.

Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan

K:\Staff\WP51\COMPPLAN\Amendments\2009-01\TE Text - Update Figs & Tables\Ord 5-09 FINAL (Proposed).doc July 30, 2009

EXHIBIT A of Ordinance 5-09

------

Town of Jupiter Comprehensive Plan

2009-01 Amendments

Amendment B - Text

July 21, 2009 Amendment B - Text

Location: Transportation Element

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT:

Goal 1: Establish a means of coordination on transportation-related issues with Palm Beach County, Martin County, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) of Palm Beach and Martin counties, the Village of Tequesta, the Town of Jupiter Island, the City of Palm Beach Gardens, the Town of Juno Beach, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, the Department of Community Affairs, the Florida Department of Transportation and other private or public, transportation-related agencies.

Policy 1.1.1 Review the existing goals, objectives and policies of other agencies when revising or altering the goals, objectives and policies for the Town.

Policy 1.1.2 Provide current and future land use plans and socioeconomic data for use by the Palm Beach County MPO in developing regional transportation plans.

Objective 1.2 The Town shall communicate with the agencies listed in Goal l regarding transportation activities and planned improvements.

Policy 1.2.1 Establish a mailing list to ensure that all interested agencies listed above are informed of transportation related activities and improvements via copies of correspondence.

Policy 1.2.2 Map and update annually transportation improvements planned for the Town indicating the agency responsible for the improvement and the estimated date of completion.

Objective 1.3 Applicable agencies listed in Goal l shall be advised of development proposals which may have impacts within their respective jurisdiction and request comments as applicable.

Policy 1.3.1 Maintain a procedure to advise applicable agencies, noted in Goal 1 of proposed development.

Policy 1.3.2 Provide the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) documentation on development proposals, with state road access, to allow for review and comment on development access prior to development approval.

Goal 2: Provide current and future public transportation options for residential and non-residential uses.

Objective 2.1 In conjunction with Palm Tran, the Town shall provide for the operation of transit in and to new development. In addition, the Town will work with Palm Tran to improve transit services to major destinations, major residential developments and major employment centers.

Policy 2.1.1 Where adequate right-of-way is available, require adequate turning radii for bus operations at major street intersections based on AASHTO's Policy on Geometry Design of Highways and Streets on roadway plans prepared by or for the Town. Coordination with FDOT and Palm Beach County shall be made to assure considerations for bus turning radii have been included in plans prepared by or for those agencies.

Policy 2.1.2 Require dedication of rights-of-way or perpetual easements in new development and redevelopment for shelters, bus turning radii and bus loading zones (consistent with Palm Tran standards) by requiring conveyance of all necessary rights-of-way or perpetual easements before issuance of building permits for the development.

Policy 2.1.3 Require provisions that support bus transit operations (such as shelters, benches, bicycle racks, and park and rides, etc.) in new development and redevelopment by inclusion of bus transit operation considerations in the approval and permitting process.

Policy 2.1.4 Coordinate with and encourage Palm Beach County to require appropriate mass transit considerations in development approvals granted for high traffic activity projects (major employment centers, commercial centers, etc.) located in the Town's annexation areas.

Policy 2.1.5 The Town shall continue to officially endorse the public transit efforts of the Palm Beach County Council on Aging, the designated provider of Florida Department of Transportation support to the transportation disadvantaged.

Objective 2.2. Develop a safe bicycle and pedestrian transportation system accessible to all major public and private facilities.

Policy 2.2.2 Coordinate and cooperate with FDOT and with the implementation of Palm Beach County's Comprehensive Bikeway Plan.

Policy 2.2.3 Assure that all transportation improvements address the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians. Where bikeways and sidewalks are needed, incorporate Florida Greenbook Design Standards, to the extent practical, in construction plans prepared for or by the Town. Coordination with FDOT and Palm Beach County shall be made to assure non-motorized considerations have been included in plans prepared by or for these agencies within the Town of Jupiter.

Policy 2.2.4 Require developers to provide bicycle facilities, sidewalks and/or multi-use paths in proposed developments (including all TODs) as appropriate for internal circulation and connection to external facilities by requiring these facilities as a part of development approval.

Policy 2.2.5 The Town adopts “by reference” it’s Bicycle Transportation Master Plan created by the Engineering and Public Works Department into the Comprehensive Plan.

Policy 2.2.6 All updates to the Town’s Bicycle Transportation Master Plan, and Figure 4 of the Transportation Element map series, will be coordinated with the Palm Beach County MPO Long Range Transportation Plan to ensure identification and provision of future needs for all transportation modes.

Policy 2.2.7 Through the Town’s Bicycle Transportation Master Plan, as amended and updated, which is adopted by reference in the Town’s Comprehensive Plan, land acquisition efforts for recreation and open space will focus on linking and enhancing existing pathways, greenways, and recreational trail systems, including the acquisition of areas for destination spots, trail heads and parking.

Policy 2.2.8 Encourage developers of non-residential projects to provide facilities for bicycle commuters such as secure bicycle racks, lockers and showers.

Objective 2.3. Provide transportation options for residential and non-residential uses. Establish a framework to create a “transit-ready” community, capable of supporting multi-modal transportation, including the development of TODs.

Policy 2.3.1 Continue to develop and encourage transportation linkage systems, including trains, buses, trolleys, water-taxis, boats, bicycles and pedestrians.

Policy 2.3.2 Require commuter parking and docking facilities, where feasible, that support multi- modal transportation systems.

Policy 2.3.3 Require passenger shelters in locations adjacent to water taxi or transit stops.

Policy 2.3.4 In the Town’s parking standards, establish a maximum amount in addition to a minimum amount of off-street parking provided, to reduce dependency on automobiles and increase dependency on other modes of transportation.

Goal 3: Provide a safe, energy efficient, convenient and economical multi modal transportation system, which provides adequate capacity for the movement of people, goods and services throughout the Town.

Objective 3.1. The Town should identify existing and future State, County and Town roadway deficiencies based on the standards adopted in this plan in conjunction with the Town’s adopted 5- year Community Investment Program and budgeting. This objective will be accomplished through an annual report based on biennial traffic counts.

Policy 3.1.1 The Town, in cooperation with Palm Beach County and the Florida Department of Transportation, shall maintain an adopted Level of Service LOS standard of D on all County and State roads, except as provided for in the Indiantown Road Corridor Master Plan (CMP) pursuant to Objective 3.6.

Policy 3.1.2 By October 2008, Tthe Town shall maintain adopt the following adopted LOS standards for all Town maintained roadways: a) Peak-hour two-way - LOS D b) Daily - LOS C c) Intersection - LOS D

Policy 3.1.3 The annual report provided for in Objective 3.1 shall include a review of existing LOS standards, and identify improvement needs and costs to provide LOS standards as provided in Policy 3.1.1 and 3.1.2.

Policy 3.1.4 Facilities currently operating at conditions below adopted LOS standards shall be maintained at least at their current LOS through development order conditions for proposed developments within the radius of influence of the currently deficient roadway system.

Policy 3.1.5 Review of traffic crash data, with special attention to those resulting in fatalities, shall be made in order to determine above average accident locations, if applicable, these locations should be identified in the annual report along with proposed corrective measures. Convey this information to Palm Beach County and FDOT.

Policy 3.1.6 By June 2008, the Town will coordinate with the Palm Beach County MPO and FDOT to complete an interchange modification study for the I-95 Expressway at Indiantown Road.

Policy 3.1.7 The Town should coordinate with Palm Beach County and State agencies, as appropriate, to evaluate roads currently failing and those projected to exceed LOS standard D in 2012 and to determine how to mitigate the impacts, pursuant to Policy 3.2.8. Any needed road improvements should be scheduled in the Town, County or State’s work program, as appropriate.

Objective 3.2. Existing and future roadway deficiencies based on standards established in this plan shall be mitigated through a continuous and timely roadway improvement program, as contained in the Town’s adopted 5-year Community Investment Program.

Policy 3.2.1 Review all proposed development and redevelopment for consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies of this plan and require coordination of traffic circulation plans and improvements with the Future Land Use Map and Infrastructure elements before granting development approval.

Policy 3.2.2 Coordinate with Palm Beach County, FDOT and other appropriate agencies to ensure prioritization and funding for improvement of roadways identified in the annual report as operating below adopted LOS standards.

Policy 3.2.3 Coordinate and assist as appropriate with Palm Beach County and Florida Department of Transportation on the investigation and mitigation of accident causes, with special attention to those resulting in fatalities, within identified high-accident locations at or within the vicinity of intersections of other roadways with Town-maintained roads.

Policy 3.2.4 Conduct a review of high traffic crash locations identified in the annual report to identify those occurring on Town maintained roadways. Conduct investigation to identify causes, with special attention to crashes resulting in fatalities, on these roadways and provide corrective measures to mitigate future crashes.

Policy 3.2.5 Review access management and new roadway connections associated with new development, redevelopment, and upgrading of existing properties to ensure safety and compatibility with the existing and future roadway network. Require vehicular and pedestrian connections to mitigate increased intensity and density. Impose, at a minimum, the access management standards adopted by FDOT as a condition of development approval.

Policy 3.2.6 As part of the development approval process, require developers to build internal or external roadways between developments and existing roadways to alleviate congestion on the roadway network and to facilitate traffic flows without requiring all traffic to use the major roadways.

Policy 3.2.7 Ensure that privately-constructed roadways conform to all design standards of the Town before the Town accepts responsibility for the roadways as a public facility.

Policy 3.2.8 The Town shall exercise one or more of the following options to mitigate future LOS deficiencies: a) Land Use and/or Zoning Changes;

b) Road and intersection improvements; c) Implementation of a Corridor Master Plan d) Mass Transit; e) Multi-modal improvement plans; f) Jupiter Open Space Program; g) Constrained Roadway At Lower Level of Service (CRALLS) in conjunction with other appropriate mitigation actions.

Objective 3.3. The Town shall protect rights-of-way to accommodate roadway needs indicated in the Future Traffic Circulation Plan.

Policy 3.3.1 Coordinate and cooperate with Palm Beach County to encourage it to provide the rights of way contained in its Thoroughfare Identification Map consistent with the Town’s Future Traffic Circulation Plan.

Policy 3.3.2 Prohibit encroachment of development and required setbacks into established present and future rights-of-way and, within the law, require dedication of rights-of-way through development orders issued by the Town by withholding building permits or certificates of occupancy, as appropriate, until the situation is corrected.

Policy 3.3.3 Review proposed development plans for level of inclusion in the Future Land Use Plan and assess the capacity needs of each project as it relates to the Thoroughfare Right-of-Way Protection Plan by requiring a traffic impact analysis with proposed development applications.

Policy 3.3.4 Investigate alternatives (including mass transit improvement programs) to transportation improvements that may encourage or subsidize increased development in coastal high-hazard areas or in identified environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, floodways, or productive marine areas. Specific alternatives could include mass transit improvement programs and the evaluation of vacant land for potential purchase by the Town for the Jupiter Open Space Program.

Objective 3.4 Provide adequate design standards to improve safety, reduce congestion, enhance visual aesthetics and reduce maintenance.

Policy 3.4.1 Continually review and revise design standards as necessary, and where appropriate coordinate Town design standards with County and State Greenbook Design Standards including non-motorized facility standards.

Policy 3.4.2 Require new development to conform to the Federal Highway Administration Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for on-site traffic control. Certificates of occupancy will be withheld until conformance is achieved.

Policy 3.4.3 All roadways on the future circulation plan within the Town shall be paved and conform to road construction standards set forth by the Town.

Policy 3.4.4 Require an adequate number of motorized and bicycle on-site parking spaces for each new site development and provide for safe and efficient movement of vehicles and pedestrians within the site in conjunction with plan review and permitting.

Policy 3.4.5 Review on-site traffic flow to assure adequate circulation for motorized and non-motorized vehicles and pedestrians is provided. Require signage and roadway specifications that

conform to the Town's adopted standards. The Town will withhold approval of construction plans until adequate circulation, signage and roadway specifications are included in plans.

Policy 3.4.6 The Town shall continue to implement a roadway visual enhancement program for all collector and arterial roadways. Development approvals adjacent to the roadway may be required to participate in the Town’s visual enhancement program on a fair share basis. Participation can include both initial installation and ongoing maintenance.

Policy 3.4.7 Ensure that a hierarchy of streets is designed and developed that encourages pedestrian traffic in a safe and convenient manner, as well as accommodating vehicular transportation needs.

Policy 3.4.8 Encourage roundabouts at suitable intersections, in order to provide efficient flow of traffic.

Objective 3.5. Ensure that the circulation system for the Indiantown Road corridor is consistent with the Jupiter Area Traffic Study, to facilitate efficient and safe vehicular and pedestrian traffic, and to implements the community design goals for that roadway.

Policy 3.5.1 Maintain and amend as necessary the limitations in the land development regulations on vehicular access points along Indiantown Road which limit vehicular access points in accordance with, at a minimum, the adopted access management standards of FDOT.

Policy 3.5.2 Provide for and implement by phase the necessary traffic operation, roadway and intersection improvements to maximize the efficiency of traffic along and across Indiantown Road.

Policy 3.5.3 Minimize the impacts of vehicular through traffic on adjacent residential streets in the Indiantown Road corridor through the implementation of traffic calming measures and restricting commercial truck traffic.

Policy 3.5.4 Encourage the support for and use of a shuttle bus program, whenever possible.

Policy 3.5.5 Provide pedestrian-oriented amenities and circulation features at specified intersections along Indiantown Road by providing incentives to private development for pedestrian improvements.

Policy 3.5.6 In order to limit vehicular access points in accordance with, at a minimum, the access management standards adopted by FDOT, the Town shall pursue interconnected parking areas through the use of inter-site Reciprocal Access Agreements for new developments along Indiantown Road.

Policy 3.5.7 Require transit facilities (benches, shelters, signs) along Indiantown Road, Military Trail, Central Boulevard, U.S. Highway One and future transit corridors at convenient pedestrian locations for both Palm Tran and local transit routes. Transit facilities must also be connected by pedestrian pathways to adjacent land uses.

Policy 3.5.8 Consistent with the Town’s adopted 5-year Community Investment Program, provide pedestrian improvements in the public right-of-way, with specific attention at intersection areas.

Policy 3.5.9 In accordance with the Town’s shared parking regulations in its Off-Street Parking and Loading Ordinance, the Town shall pursue shared parking for new development along Indiantown Road in order to facilitate efficient parcel usage and to limit vehicular access points in accordance with the access management standards under rules promulgated by the Florida Department of Transportation.

Policy 3.5.10 Maintain intersection engineering standards which ensure the adopted Intersection LOS standards are maintained on Town roads.

Policy 3.5.11 Maintain minimum landscape requirements for all parking areas.

Policy 3.5.12 Promote distinctive entry drive design and materials requirements.

Policy 3.5.13 Maintain zoning code regulations for screening front-yard parking lots.

Policy 3.6.1 Traffic conditions contained in for the Indiantown Road Corridor Master Plan shall be based on the buildout conditions assumed in the Jupiter Area Study.

Policy 3.6.2 The Town shall coordinate with Palm Beach County to implement mitigation strategies for adopt the Indiantown Road Corridor Master Plan Ordinance , which shall may include the following:

a) Adopted LOS standards and a methodology for transportation concurrency review and approval for developments impacting the Corridor. b) A methodology to manage the following Jupiter Area Study mitigation strategies for developments determined to have impacts within the Corridor: 1. Roadway construction including new facilities, additional lanes and intersection improvements; 2. Land use – acquisition for open space use and floor area ratio standards for industrial, office and retail uses; and 3. transportation demand management; c) A public notification process; d) A variance and appeal process; and e) An intergovernmental coordination process that provides for the management of the Indiantown Road Corridor Master Plan with Palm Beach County.

Policy 3.6.3 The Indiantown Road Corridor Master Plan shall be jointly administered by the Town and Palm Beach County.

Policy 3.6.4 Indiantown Road will be maintained as a 6-lane facility (through lanes) in the Town, consistent with the Jupiter Area Traffic Study.

Policy 3.6.5 The Town will coordinate with Palm Beach County to optimize traffic signal timing at intersections such that traffic on the lower function classification roads will not experience excessive delays.

Goal 4: To accommodate a variety of regional, intercounty, intracounty, and local traffic demands in ways that minimize traffic congestion; encourage pedestrians; reduce the overall amount of travel for daily goods and services; and protect the integrity of existing neighborhoods.

Objective 4.1 The Town will continue to study and evaluate the long range transportation needs of the community while protecting the existing and proposed residential neighborhoods, infill and redevelopment areas.

Policy 4.1.1 The Town, in coordination/cooperation with Palm Beach County, Martin County, the Village of Tequesta, the MPOs of Martin and Palm Beach counties, the Town of Juno Beach, the City of Palm Beach Gardens and other appropriate governmental agencies, shall encourage and participate in long range transportation planning efforts and sound transportation planning principles such as connectivity and traffic calming measures to minimize the adverse impacts of new or expanding roadways and that protect existing or proposed residential neighborhoods by locating new or expanding roadways in a manner that minimizes any adverse impacts to such neighborhoods. New development, redevelopment, and upgrading of existing properties shall be designed to provide vehicular and pedestrian connectivity with existing and proposed roads to mitigate increased density or intensity.

Policy 4.1.2 The Town, to the extent possible, shall encourage the construction of new roads and the expansion of existing roads in a manner that protects existing or proposed residential neighborhoods by diverting or eliminating the flow of non-resident or cut through traffic, and requiring that the functional classification of local roadways may not be changed without amending the Town’s Comprehensive Plan.

Policy 4.1.3 The Town shall protect the Limestone Creek neighborhood and discourage any connection of Church Street to Island Way.

Policy 4.14 The Town will amend, as necessary, the adopted mass transit study. The study will be updated as needed to facilitate the implementation of the plan, including Transit Oriented Developments.

Policy 4.1.5 Encourage connectivity of roadways in the Town to reduce congestion on arterial and collector roads, including bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and utilize traffic calming measures to minimize traffic impacts on residential neighborhoods.

TABLE 2 JUPITER TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS (2007)

Roadway Lane LOS C/D (1) LOS D 2007 2007 From To Geometry Average Two-way PSWADT LOS Two-way LOS Daily Peak Hour Count (4) Peak Hour (4) A1A US 1 Indiantown Road 2L 12,300 1,170 10,158 D 882 D Indiantown Road Marcinski Road 2L 12,300 1,170 8,956 C 773 C Donald Ross Road Marcinski Road 2L 12,300 1,170 6,021 C 578 C Alternate A1A North of Riverside Drive 6LD 49,200 4,680 40,811 D 3,481 C Riverside Drive Center Street 6LD 49,200 4,680 40,811 D 3,481 C Center Street Indiantown Road 6LD 49,200 4,680 32,761 C 2,726 C Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 4LD 32,700 3,110 30,953 D 2,677 D Toney Penna Drive Frederick Small Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 26,319 D 2,243 C Frederick Small Road Donald Ross Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 26,319 D 2,243 C Bush Rd Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 2L 6,800 8,500 (3) 880 1010 4,010 B 370 B Center Street Indiantown Road Loxahatchee River Road 2L 15,500 (2) 1,480 (2) 14,294 F 1,337 F Loxahatchee River Road Pennock Lane 2L 20,700 (2) 1,990 (2) 16,077 F 1,363 F Pennock Lane Alternate A1A 2L 20,700 (2) 1,990 (2) 17,114 F 1,550 F Central Boulevard Roebuck Road Church Street 2L 12,300 1,170 14,088 F 1,350 F Church Street Indiantown Road 2L 12,300 1,170 14,088 F 1,350 F Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 4LD 32,700 3,110 25,674 C 2,301 C Toney Penna Drive Indian Creek Parkway 4LD 32,700 3,110 15,909 C 2,301 C Indian Creek Parkway Frederick Small Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 11,577 C 1,239 C Frederick Small Road Donald Ross Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 16,300 C 1,479 C Church Street West of Limestone Creek Road 2L 12,300 1,170 2,736 C 254 C Limestone Creek Road Central Boulevard 2L 12,300 1,170 5,563 C 1,130 D Dakota Dr Greenway Dr Central Boulevard 2L 12,500 13,100 (3) 1,610 1,530 1,955 A 297 A Central Boulevard Military Trail 2L 8,800 9,700 (3) 1,120 3,783 A 420 A Donald Ross Road I-95/Turnpike Heights Blvd 4LD 32,700 3,110 36,342 F 3,435 F Heights Blvd Central Boulevard 4LD 32,700 3,110 30,517 D 2,730 D Central Boulevard Military Trail 6LD 49,200 4,680 31,314 C 2,613 C Military Trail Alternate A1A 6LD 49,200 4,680 31,314 C 2,613 C Alternate A1A Prosperity Farms Rd 4LD 32,700 3,110 29,559 D 2,516 D East of Prosperity Farms Rd 4LD 32,700 3,110 29,931 D 2,733 D Frederick Small Road Parkside Drive Central Boulevard 2L 11,000 11,700 (3) 1,420 1,370 5,768 B 571 B Central Boulevard Military Trail 4LD 32,700 3,110 7,893 C 870 C Military Trail Alternate A1A 2L 12,300 1,170 9,069 D 819 C Alternate A1A Palmwood Drive 2L 12,300 1,170 3,422 C 371 C Greenway Dr Jeaga Dr Indian Creek Parkway 2L 11,300 (3) 1,430 1,150 6,695 B 709 B Heights Boulevard North of Frederick Small Road 2L 11,100 11,700 (3) 1,430 1,370 5,296 B 687 B Frederick Small Road Donald Ross Road 2L 10,900 11,500 (3) 1,430 1,370 6,008 B 985 C Indian Creek Parkway Maplewood Drive Central Boulevard 2L 12,300 1,170 15,024 F 1,493 F Central Boulevard Military Trail 4LD 32,700 3,110 8,853 C 820 C Indiantown Road West of Florida's Turnpike 4LD 32,700 3,110 31,109 D 2,776 D Florida's Turnpike I-95 4LD 32,700 3,110 47,570 F 4,077 F I-95 Island Way 6LD 49,200 4,680 57,141 F 5,040 F Island Way Central Boulevard 6LD 49,200 4,680 51,374 E 4,981 F Central Boulevard Chasewood Plaza 6LD 49,200 4,680 55,258 F 4,483 D Chasewood Plaza Center Street 6LD 49,200 4,680 55,258 F 4,483 D Center Street Maplewood Drive 6LD 49,200 4,680 48,917 D 4,276 D Maplewood Drive Pennock Lane 6LD 49,200 4,680 47,343 D 4,161 D Pennock Lane Military Trail 6LD 49,200 4,680 42,996 D 3,542 C TABLE 2 JUPITER TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS (2007)

Roadway Lane LOS C/D (1) LOS D 2007 2007 From To Geometry Average Two-way PSWADT LOS Two-way LOS Daily Peak Hour Count (4) Peak Hour (4) Military Trail Loxahatchee Drive 6LD 49,200 4,680 38,596 C 3,178 C Loxahatchee Drive Alternate A1A 6LD 49,200 4,680 38,596 C 3,178 C Alternate A1A US 1 6LD 49,200 4,680 28,888 C 2,385 C US 1 Ocean Boulevard 4LD 32,700 3,110 15,781 C 1,354 C Island Way North of Indiantown Rd 4LD 24,500 2,330 7,588 C 711 C South of Indiantown Rd 2L 12,300 1,170 ---- Jupiter Park Drive West of Central Boulevard 2L 10,100 10,300 (3) 1,300 1,240 6,200 B 1,040 C D Limestone Creek Road Church Street Island Way 2L 8,600 8,300 (3) 1,120 980 2,500 A 260 A Longshore Drive Northfork Drive Central Boulevard 2L 9,000 10,000 (3) 1,170 4,674 B 477 B Loxahatchee Drive Center Street Indiantown Road 2L 7,100 7,400 (3) 880 840 3,562 B 379 B Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 2L 6,800 7,100 (3) 850 810 3,126 B A 342 B Loxahatchee River Road Palm Beach County Line Roebuck Road 2L 12,300 1,170 3,010 C 268 C Roebuck Road Center Street 2L 12,300 1,170 8,228 C 786 C Maplewood Drive Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 4LD 21,500 22,500 (3) 2,810 2,660 12,241 B 1,276 B Toney Penna Drive Indian Creek Parkway 2L 13,000 13,400 (3) 1,710 1,610 8,031 B 840 B Marcinski Road Intracoastal US 1 2L 12,300 1,170 9,065 D 627 C US 1 Ocean Boulevard 2L 12,300 1,170 3,084 C 197 C Military Trail Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 6LD 49,200 4,680 23,734 C 1,958 C Toney Penna Drive Indian Creek Parkway 6LD 49,200 4,680 28,450 C 2,553 C Indian Creek Parkway Frederick Small Road 6LD 49,200 4,680 28,262 C 2,495 C Frederick Small Road Donald Ross Road 6LD 49,200 4,680 34,083 C 3,166 C Old Dixie Highway Toney Penna Drive Jupiter Lakes Blvd 2L 8,200 9,100 (3) 1,030 1,040 6,191 C B 547 B Parkside Dr Donald Ross Road University Dr 4LD 21,300 21,500 (3) 2,660 2,440 8,167 A 575 A Pennock Lane Center Street Indiantown Road 2L 6,500 7,100 (3) 800 6,558 D C 643 C Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 2L 9,100 10,000 (3) 1,190 1,180 3,518 A 368 A Riverside Drive Alternate A1A Seabrook Rd 2L 7,600 9,500 (3) 980 10,074 F D 915 D Seabrook Rd Tequesta Dr 2L 7,300 9,000 (3) 950 960 6,062 C B 569 C Roebuck Road Central Boulevard Loxahatchee River Road 2L 12,300 1,170 5,712 C 598 C Toney Penna Drive Central Boulevard Maplewood Drive 2L 10,200 11,000 (3) 1,340 1,310 9,087 C 900 C Maplewood Drive Pennock Lane 2L 12,100 13,000 (3) 1,630 1,590 12,506 C 1,314 D Pennock Lane Military Trail 2L 10,300 11,100 (3) 1,360 1,350 12,929 D 1,276 D Military Trail Alternate A1A 2L 8,800 9,600 (3) 1,130 1,120 10,846 E D 947 D University Drive Parkside Drive Central Boulevard 2L 12,300 1,170 4,824 C 94 B Central Boulevard Military Trail 2L 12,300 1,170 4,311 C 394 C US 1 Alternate A1A Ocean Boulevard 4LD 32,700 3,110 22,530 C 1,969 C Ocean Boulevard Indiantown Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 18,944 C 1,662 C Indiantown Road Marcinski Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 26,723 D 2,248 C Marcinski Road Donald Ross Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 35,975 F 3,164 E

NOTES: (1) LOS D for State/County Roads and LOS C for Town Roads (2) CRALLS designation per Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners (3) LOS C service volume for Town road sections (4) LOS condition (A-F) associated with 2007 volumes (4) This roadway did not load any trips in models, therefore it requires manual adjustments. TABLE 3 JUPITER TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT FUTURE-YEAR CONDITIONS (2012)

Roadway Lane LOS C/D (1) LOS D 2012 2012 From To Geometry Average Two-way PSWADT LOS Two-way LOS Daily Peak Hour Volume (4) Peak Hour (4) A1A US 1 Indiantown Road 2L 12,300 1,170 11,189 D 1,063 D Indiantown Road Marcinski Road 2L 12,300 1,170 9,171 D 871 D Donald Ross Road Marcinski Road 2L 12,300 1,170 6,075 C 577 C Alternate A1A North of Riverside Drive 6LD 49,200 4,680 44,796 D 4,256 D Riverside Drive Center Street 6LD 49,200 4,680 44,145 D 4,194 D Center Street Indiantown Road 6LD 49,200 4,680 36,769 C 3,493 C Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 6LD 49,200 4,680 34,952 C 3,320 C Toney Penna Drive Frederick Small Road 6LD 49,200 4,680 30,284 C 2,877 C Frederick Small Road Donald Ross Road 6LD 49,200 4,680 30,497 C 2,897 C Bush Road Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 2L 6,800 8,500 (3) 880 1,010 4,320 B 410 B Center Street Indiantown Road Loxahatchee River Road 2L 15,500 (2) 1,480 (2) 14,447 F 1,373 F Loxahatchee River Road Pennock Lane 2L 20,700 (2) 1,990 (2) 16,072 F 1,527 F Pennock Lane Alternate A1A 2L 20,700 (2) 1,990 (2) 17,033 F 1,618 F Central Boulevard Roebuck Road Church Street 4LD 32,700 3,110 14,186 C 1,348 C Church Street Indiantown Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 14,612 C 1,388 C Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 4LD 32,700 3,110 27,709 D 2,632 D Toney Penna Drive Indian Creek Parkway 4LD 32,700 3,110 17,351 C 1,648 C Indian Creek Parkway Frederick Small Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 15,354 C 1,459 C Frederick Small Road Donald Ross Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 21,727 C 2,064 C Church Street West of Limestone Creek Road 2L 12,300 1,170 3,650 C 347 C Limestone Creek Road Central Boulevard 2L 12,300 1,170 6,077 C 577 C Dakota Dr Greenway Dr Central Boulevard 2L 12,500 13,100 (3) 1,610 1,530 2,535 A 241 A Central Boulevard Military Trail 2L 8,800 9,700 (3) 1,120 4,097 B A 389 A Donald Ross Road I-95/Turnpike Heights Blvd 6LD 49,200 4,680 46,244 D 4,393 D Heights Blvd Central Boulevard 6LD 49,200 4,680 40,541 D 3,851 D Central Boulevard Military Trail 6LD 49,200 4,680 40,852 D 3,881 D Military Trail Alternate A1A 6LD 49,200 4,680 40,580 D 3,855 D Alternate A1A Prosperity Farms Rd 6LD 49,200 4,680 34,143 C 3,244 C East of Prosperity Farms Rd 4LD 32,700 3,110 33,628 E 3,195 E Frederick Small Road Parkside Drive Central Boulevard 2L 11,000 11,700 (3) 1,420 1,370 6,871 B 653 B Central Boulevard Military Trail 4LD 32,700 3,110 8,710 C 827 C Military Trail Alternate A1A 2L 12,300 1,170 9,614 D 913 D Alternate A1A Palmwood Drive 2L 12,300 1,170 3,569 C 339 C Greenway Dr Jeaga Dr Indian Creek Parkway 2L 11,300 (3) 1,430 1,150 7,018 B 667 B Heights Boulevard North of Frederick Small Road 2L 11,100 11,700 (3) 1,430 1,370 5,239 B 498 A B Frederick Small Road Donald Ross Road 2L 10,900 11,500 (3) 1,430 1,370 6,094 B 579 B Indian Creek Parkway Maplewood Drive Central Boulevard 4LD 32,700 3,110 18,513 C 1,759 C Central Boulevard Military Trail 4LD 32,700 3,110 10,860 C 1,032 C Indiantown Road West of Florida's Turnpike 6LD 49,200 4,680 34,943 C 3,320 C Florida's Turnpike I-95 6LD 49,200 4,680 46,708 D 4,437 D I-95 Island Way 6LD 49,200 4,680 62,057 F 5,895 F Island Way Central Boulevard 6LD 49,200 4,680 57,204 F 5,434 F Central Boulevard Chasewood Plaza 6LD 49,200 4,680 59,077 F 5,612 F Chasewood Plaza Center Street 6LD 49,200 4,680 58,675 F 5,574 F Center Street Maplewood Drive 6LD 49,200 4,680 52,606 F 4,998 F Maplewood Drive Pennock Lane 6LD 49,200 4,680 50,322 E 4,781 E Pennock Lane Military Trail 6LD 49,200 4,680 46,095 D 4,379 D TABLE 3 JUPITER TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT FUTURE-YEAR CONDITIONS (2012)

Roadway Lane LOS C/D (1) LOS D 2012 2012 From To Geometry Average Two-way PSWADT LOS Two-way LOS Daily Peak Hour Volume (4) Peak Hour (4) Military Trail Loxahatchee Drive 6LD 49,200 4,680 44,459 D 4,224 D Loxahatchee Drive Alternate A1A 6LD 49,200 4,680 43,176 D 4,102 D Alternate A1A US 1 6LD 49,200 4,680 33,289 C 3,162 C US 1 Ocean Boulevard 4LD 32,700 3,110 16,844 C 1,600 C Island Way North of Indiantown Rd 4LD 24,500 2,330 11,603 C 1,102 C South of Indiantown Rd 2L 12,300 1,170 ---- Jupiter Park Drive West of Central Boulevard 2L 10,100 10,300 (3) 1,300 1,240 8,807 C 837 C Limestone Creek Road Church Street Island Way 2L 8,600 8,300 (3) 1,120 980 6,558 C 623 B C Longshore Drive Northfork Drive Central Boulevard 2L 9,000 10,000 (3) 1,170 4,682 B 445 B Loxahatchee Drive Center Street Indiantown Road 2L 7,100 7,400 (3) 880 840 4,472 B 425 B Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 2L 6,800 7,100 (3) 850 810 3,368 B 320 A B Loxahatchee River Road Palm Beach County Line Roebuck Road 2L 12,300 1,170 2,987 C 284 C Roebuck Road Center Street 2L 12,300 1,170 8,563 C 814 C Maplewood Drive Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 4LD 21,500 22,500 (3) 2,810 2,660 13,813 B 1,312 B Toney Penna Drive Indian Creek Parkway 2L 13,000 13,400 (3) 1,710 1,610 10,421 C 990 C Marcinski Road Intracoastal US 1 2L 12,300 1,170 9,074 D 862 D US 1 Ocean Boulevard 2L 12,300 1,170 3,121 C 296 C Military Trail Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 6LD 49,200 4,680 26,564 C 2,524 C Toney Penna Drive Indian Creek Parkway 6LD 49,200 4,680 33,671 C 3,199 C Indian Creek Parkway Frederick Small Road 6LD 49,200 4,680 33,178 C 3,152 C Frederick Small Road Donald Ross Road 6LD 49,200 4,680 41,918 D 3,982 D Old Dixie Highway Toney Penna Drive Jupiter Lakes Blvd 2L 8,200 9,100 1,030 1,040 6,562 C B 623 B Parkside Dr Donald Ross Road University Dr 4LD 32,700 21,500 (3) 3,110 2,440 10,427 B 991 A B Pennock Lane Center Street Indiantown Road 2L 6,500 7,100 (3) 800 7,084 D C 673 C D Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 2L 9,100 10,000 (3) 1,190 1,180 3,923 A 373 A Riverside Drive Alternate A1A Seabrook Rd 2L 7,600 9,500 (3) 980 10,082 F D 958 D Seabrook Rd Tequesta Dr 2L 7,300 9,000 (3) 950 960 6,082 C B 578 C Roebuck Road Central Boulevard Loxahatchee River Road 2L 12,300 1,170 6,019 C 572 C Toney Penna Drive Central Boulevard Maplewood Drive 2L 10,200 11,000 (3) 1,340 1,310 11,096 D 1,054 D Maplewood Drive Pennock Lane 2L 12,100 13,000 (3) 1,630 1,590 13,212 D 1,255 D Pennock Lane Military Trail 2L 10,300 11,100 (3) 1,360 1,350 13,514 E D 1,284 D Military Trail Alternate A1A 2L 8,800 9,600 (3) 1,130 1,120 10,898 E D 1,035 D University Drive Parkside Drive Central Boulevard 2L 12,300 1,170 6,948 C 660 C Central Boulevard Military Trail 2L 12,300 1,170 6,749 C 641 C US 1 Alternate A1A Ocean Boulevard 4LD 32,700 3,110 23,320 C 2,215 C Ocean Boulevard Indiantown Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 19,847 C 1,885 C Indiantown Road Marcinski Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 28,012 D 2,661 D Marcinski Road Donald Ross Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 37,031 F 3,518 F

NOTES: (1) LOS D for State/County roads and LOS C for Town roads (2) CRALLS designation per Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners (3) LOS C service volume for Town road sections (4) LOS condition (A-F) associated with 2012 volumes TABLE 4 JUPITER TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT FUTURE-YEAR CONDITIONS (2030)

Roadway Lane LOS C/D (1) LOS D 2030 2030 From To Geometry Average Two-way PSWADT LOS Two-way LOS Daily Peak Hour Volume (4) Peak Hour (4) A1A US 1 Indiantown Road 2L 12,300 1,170 12,396 E 1,178 E Indiantown Road Marcinski Road 2L 12,300 1,170 10,032 D 953 D Donald Ross Road Marcinski Road 2L 12,300 1,170 6,646 C 631 C Alternate A1A North of Riverside Drive 6LD 49,200 4,680 48,337 D 4,592 D Riverside Drive Center Street 6LD 49,200 4,680 60,341 F 5,732 F Center Street Indiantown Road 6LD 49,200 4,680 59,390 F 5,642 F Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 6LD 49,200 4,680 44,719 D 4,248 D Toney Penna Drive Frederick Small Road 6LD 49,200 4,680 46,594 D 4,426 D Frederick Small Road Donald Ross Road 6LD 49,200 4,680 47,324 D 4,496 D Bush Road Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 2L 6,800 8,500 (3) 880 1,010 4,730 B 449 B Center Street Indiantown Road Loxahatchee River Road 2L 15,500 (2) 1,480 (2) 15,805 F 1,501 F Loxahatchee River Road Pennock Lane 2L 20,700 (2) 1,990 (2) 17,582 F 1,670 F Pennock Lane Alternate A1A 2L 20,700 (2) 1,990 (2) 18,633 F 1,770 F Central Boulevard Roebuck Road Church Street 4LD 32,700 3,110 15,445 C 1,467 C Church Street Indiantown Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 21,922 C 2,083 C Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 4LD 32,700 3,110 29,083 D 2,763 D Toney Penna Drive Indian Creek Parkway 4LD 32,700 3,110 17,674 C 1,679 C Indian Creek Parkway Frederick Small Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 20,401 C 1,938 C Frederick Small Road Donald Ross Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 28,988 D 2,754 D Church Street West of Limestone Creek Road 2L 12,300 1,170 3,993 C 379 C Limestone Creek Road Central Boulevard 2L 12,300 1,170 6,321 C 600 C Dakota Dr Greenway Dr Central Boulevard 2L 12,500 13,100 (3) 1,610 1,530 3,806 A 362 A Central Boulevard Military Trail 2L 8,800 9,700 (3) 1,120 4,482 B 426 B Donald Ross Road I-95/Turnpike Heights Blvd 6LD 49,200 4,680 51,058 E 4,851 E Heights Blvd Central Boulevard 6LD 49,200 4,680 44,348 D 4,213 D Central Boulevard Military Trail 6LD 49,200 4,680 53,578 F 5,090 F Military Trail Alternate A1A 6LD 49,200 4,680 49,383 E 4,691 E Alternate A1A Prosperity Farms Rd 6LD 49,200 4,680 36,520 C 3,469 C East of Prosperity Farms Rd 4LD 32,700 3,110 36,787 F 3,495 F Frederick Small Road Parkside Drive Central Boulevard 2L 11,000 11,700 (3) 1,420 1,370 9,020 C 857 C Central Boulevard Military Trail 4LD 32,700 3,110 9,431 C 896 C Military Trail Alternate A1A 2L 12,300 1,170 13,407 F 1,274 F Alternate A1A Palmwood Drive 2L 12,300 1,170 3,905 C 371 C Greenway Dr Jeaga Dr Indian Creek Parkway 2L 11,300 (3) 1,430 1,150 8,213 C B 780 B Heights Boulevard North of Frederick Small Road 2L 11,100 11,700 (3) 1,430 1,370 7,970 C B 757 B Frederick Small Road Donald Ross Road 2L 10,900 11,500 (3) 14,30 1,370 9,719 C 923 C Indian Creek Parkway Maplewood Drive Central Boulevard 4LD 32,700 3,110 26,833 D 2,549 D Central Boulevard Military Trail 4LD 32,700 3,110 12,911 C 1,227 C Indiantown Road West of Florida's Turnpike 6LD 49,200 4,680 65,952 F 6,265 F Florida's Turnpike I-95 6LD 49,200 4,680 61,546 F 5,847 F I-95 Island Way 6LD 49,200 4,680 86,362 F 8,204 F Island Way Central Boulevard 6LD 49,200 4,680 70,166 F 6,666 F Central Boulevard Chasewood Plaza 6LD 49,200 4,680 63,615 F 6,043 F Chasewood Plaza Center Street 6LD 49,200 4,680 60,633 F 5,760 F Center Street Maplewood Drive 6LD 49,200 4,680 61,312 F 5,825 F Maplewood Drive Pennock Lane 6LD 49,200 4,680 51,454 E 4,888 E Pennock Lane Military Trail 6LD 49,200 4,680 54,354 F 5,164 F TABLE 4 JUPITER TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT FUTURE-YEAR CONDITIONS (2030)

Roadway Lane LOS C/D (1) LOS D 2030 2030 From To Geometry Average Two-way PSWADT LOS Two-way LOS Daily Peak Hour Volume (4) Peak Hour (4) Military Trail Loxahatchee Drive 6LD 49,200 4,680 62,019 F 5,892 F Loxahatchee Drive Alternate A1A 6LD 49,200 4,680 58,053 F 5,515 F Alternate A1A US 1 6LD 49,200 4,680 42,837 D 4,070 D US 1 Ocean Boulevard 4LD 32,700 3,110 19,230 C 1,827 C Island Way North of Indiantown Rd 4LD 24,500 2,330 27,820 D 2,643 D South of Indiantown Rd 2L 12,300 1,170 8,694 C 826 C Jupiter Park Drive West of Central Boulevard 2L 10,100 10,300 (3) 1,300 1,240 6,080 B 578 B Limetone Creek Road Church Street Island Way 2L 8,600 8,300 (3) 1,120 980 8,780 D 834 C D Longshore Drive Northfork Drive Central Boulevard 2L 9,000 10,000 (3) 1,170 8,189 6,229 C B 778 592 C B Loxahatchee Drive Center Street Indiantown Road 2L 7,100 7,400 (3) 880 840 6,885 C 654 C Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 2L 6,800 7,100 (3) 850 810 3,684 B 350 B Loxahatchee River Road Palm Beach County Line Roebuck Road 2L 12,300 1,170 3,267 C 310 C Roebuck Road Center Street 2L 12,300 1,170 9,682 D 920 D Maplewood Drive Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 4LD 21,500 22,500 (3) 2,810 2,660 18,717 C 1,778 C Toney Penna Drive Indian Creek Parkway 2L 13,000 13,400 (3) 1,710 1,610 11,400 C 1,083 C Marcinski Road Intracoastal US 1 2L 12,300 1,170 9,169 D 871 D US 1 Ocean Boulevard 2L 12,300 1,170 4,009 C 381 C Military Trail Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 6LD 49,200 4,680 36,615 C 3,478 C Toney Penna Drive Indian Creek Parkway 6LD 49,200 4,680 44,787 D 4,255 D Indian Creek Parkway Frederick Small Road 6LD 49,200 4,680 41,368 D 3,930 D Frederick Small Road Donald Ross Road 6LD 49,200 4,680 53,649 F 5,097 F Old Dixie Highway Toney Penna Drive Jupiter Lakes Blvd 2L 8,200 9,100 1,030 1,040 7,420 C 705 C Parkside Dr Donald Ross Road University Dr 4LD 32,700 21,500 (3) 3,110 2,440 16,828 C 1,599 B C Pennock Lane Center Street Indiantown Road 2L 6,500 7,100 (3) 800 7,749 F D 736 D Indiantown Road Toney Penna Drive 2L 9,100 10,000 (3) 1,190 1,180 4,291 B A 408 A Riverside Drive Alternate A1A Seabrook Rd 2L 7,600 9,500 (3) 980 11,397 F D 1,083 F Seabrook Rd Tequesta Dr 2L 7,300 9,000 (3) 950 960 6,653 C 632 C Roebuck Road Central Boulevard Loxahatchee River Road 2L 12,300 1,170 8,123 C 772 C Toney Penna Drive Central Boulevard Maplewood Drive 2L 10,200 11,000 (3) 1,340 1,310 12,138 D 1,153 D Maplewood Drive Pennock Lane 2L 12,100 13,000 (3) 1,630 1,590 14,337 D 1,362 D Pennock Lane Military Trail 2L 10,300 11,100 (3) 1,360 1,350 14,783 E 1,404 E Military Trail Alternate A1A 2L 8,800 9,600 (3) 1,130 1,120 11,922 F E 1,133 E University Drive Parkside Drive Central Boulevard 2L 14,900 1,390 10,911 D 1,037 D Central Boulevard Military Trail 2L 14,900 1,390 6,862 C 652 C US 1 Alternate A1A Ocean Boulevard 4LD 32,700 3,110 26,960 D 2,561 D Ocean Boulevard Indiantown Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 24,460 C 2,324 C Indiantown Road Marcinski Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 31,713 D 3,013 D Marcinski Road Donald Ross Road 4LD 32,700 3,110 44,480 F 4,226 F

NOTES: (1) LOS D for State/County roads and LOS C for Town roads (2) CRALLS designation per Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners (3) LOS C service volume for Town road sections (4) LOS condition (A-F) associated with 2030 volumes (4) This roadway did not load any trips in models, therefore it requires manual adjustments.

Figure 4

Town of Jupiter Bicycle Transportation Master Plan December 2008

OK RD

BRO BEACH RD E RIVE EA RSIDE DR

NGSHORE DR NGSHORE O L 0 1

SLAND W Country Day of Jupiter

I Miles

CHURCH ST CENTER ST

Limestone Creek Elementary Y Hi-Tech Academy

IE HW N Playful Parenting of the Plm Bchs O CEA

LD DIX N BLV

PENNOCK LN

N D Jupiter Preschool Child Enrichment Ctr Turtle River Montessori

E DR

USH RD

LN B Early Learning Ctr Discover Kids of Jupiter CK

CHE Y

Jupiter ElementaryH School Jupiter Christian School NNO Legend USH RD

JUPITER PARK DR S DR LOXAHA JupiterS High SchoolD DIXIE L

Bike Master Plan 2008 VD Jupiter Montessori Academy Jerry Thomas Elementary PENNA O

ILITARY TRL Shoulder Designation TONEY M

D DR LAKES BLVD NTRAL BL JUPITER

Desired Connection CE OCEAN WY

EWOO RL Existing Bike Lane APL T M

INETREE Proposed Bike Lane All Saints Christian School P Childrens Beginnings

INDIAN CREE Existing Multi-Use Jupiter First Church Preschool K PKWY INDIAN CREE S K PKWY O Temple Beth Am-Reform CE Proposed Multi-Use DR AN B

NWAY LVD Existing Shoulder Parks DAKOTA DR ABACOA PARK JUPITER VILLAGE PARK GREE

BURT REYNOLDS DS PARK LIGHTHOUSE PARK NTRAL BL Jupiter Middle School

Proposed Shoulder CARLIN PARK LOGERHEAD PARK CE 4. DAILY PARK MAPLEWOOD PARK Eman Marcus Child CtrSORIANO DR Lighthouse Elementary DIAMOND HEAD-RADNOR PARK NORTH COUNTY AQUA. COMPLEX Riverwalk Existing DUBOIS/JUPITER BEACH PARK OCEAN CAY PARK F.I.N.D. PARK OLD TOWN HALL PARK D INDIAN CREEK PARK RIVERBEND PARK R FREDERICK SMALL RD OCEA MARCINSKI RD Riverwalk Proposed JUNO BEACH PARK ROGER DEAN STADIUM Independence Middle School MALL JUPITER COMMUNITY PARK WEST JUPITER COMM. CENTER N BLV DERICK S JUPITER INLET PARK JUPITER RIVERWALK PARK FRE VD Schools D

BLVD

NTRAL BL

Schools HTS

Roadway IG Country Day Care Jupiter Montessori Academy

MILITARY TRL

Limestone Creek Elementary Child Enrichment Center SIDE DR Water Jupiter Preschool Temple Beth-Am Reform N Jerry Thomas Elementary All Saints Christian ARK P Beacon Cove Middle School Jupiter Christian School Jupiter First Church Florida Atlantic University Early Learning Center Eman Marcus Child Center County Park DONALD ROSS RD Jupiter High School Independence Middle Jupiter Elementary Childrens Beginnings Town Park Discovery Kids of Jupiter Lighthouse Elementary Playful Parenting Jupiter Middle High Tech Academy Beacon Cove Elementary Town Limits Turtle River Montessori William T. Dwyer High William T. Dwyer High School File: K:\Drawings\GIS\Bike lanes\PnZ\200812 Figure 4 Transport Master.mxd By: James Rahrig - Town of Jupiter

FIGURE 7 Town of Jupiter Year 2030 Level-of-Service Map NORTHFORK DR

LOXAHATCHEE

RIVER RD

ISLAND WAY

US HWY 1 W RIVERSIDE DR

C/2L F/2L 6653 D/6LD 11397 B/2L (632) 48337 Martin County 6229 (1083) (4592) (592) C/2L D/4LD 8123 LONGSHORE DR 26960 (772) (2561) D/2L C/4LD Palm Beach County 9682 15445 (920) F/6LD (1467) C/2L C/2L F/2L F/2L 60341 3993 6321 17582 18633 (5732) E/2L (1670) (1770) ALTERNATE A1A (379) D/2L (600) CENTER ST 12396 C/2L (1178) 8780 F/6LD C/4LD D/4LD C/4LD F/2L D/2L 6885 Atlantic (834) 59390 24460 27820 21922 15805 7749 (654) (5642) (2324) (2643) (2083) (1501) (736) F/6LD F/6LD F/6LD F/6LD F/6LD F/6LD E/6LD F/6LD F/6LD C/4LD Ocean F/6LD F/6LD D/6LD 65952 61546 86362 70166 63615 60633 61312 51454 54354 62019 42837 19230 N PENNOCK LN 58053 (6265) (5847) (6666) (6043) (5760) (5825) (4888) (5164) (5892) (1827) (8204) (5515) (4070) C/2L INDIANTOWN RD C/6LD B/2L D/6LD 8694 D/4LD B/2L 36615 3684 44719 (826) 29083 4730 C/4LD A/2L (3478) (350) (4248) (2763) (449) 18717 4291 B/2L D/2L (1778) (408) E/2L E/2L 6080 D/2L BUSH RD 12138 14783 11922 (578) 14337 (1153) (1404) LOXAHATCHEE DR (1133) (1362) S PENNOCK LN D/2L 10032

S OLD DIXIE HWY (953) C/2L C/2L 7420 11400 (705) (1083) OCEAN WY C/4LD D/6LD

CENTRAL BLVD 44787 17674 S OCEAN BLVD (A1A) D/4LD (4255) A1A ALTERNATE

(1679) MAPLEWOOD DR 31713 (3013)

PINETREE TRL TRLMILITARY D/4LD 26833 C/4LD D/6LD INDIAN CREEK PKWY(2549) 12911 (1227) 46594 (4426) US HWY 1 D/6LD 41368 B/2L A/2L B/2L (3930) 8213 3806 4482 (780) (362) DAKOTA DR (426)

GREENWAY DR C/4LD SORIANO DR 20401 (1938) B/2L F/2L C/2L C/4LD C/2L D/2L C/2L 7970 13407 9020 9431 3905 9169 4009 (757) (1274) (857) (896) (371) (871) (381) FREDERICK SMALL RD Legend: D/4LD MARCINSKI RD 28988 (2754) C/2L D/6LD C/6LD Level-of-Service (Peak Hour) / Number of Lanes CENTRAL BLVD 6862 F/6LD 47324 D/2L (652) 53649 (4496) C/2L 33880 10911 (5097) Peak Season Weekday Average Daily Traffic 9719 C/4LD (1037) HEIGHTS BLVD (923) (3151) Two-way Peak Hour Traffic 16828 PARKSIDE DR (1599) E/6LD D/6LD F/6LD E/6LD C/6LD Town of Jupiter 51058 44348 53578 49383 36520 Water (4851) (4213) (5090) (4691) (3469) Boundary DONALD ROSS RD