DOCSLIB.ORG

A Crisis of Trust/Media/ and Reason In/Values/ the Digital Age./Trust/ Judgement/Accuracy/ Reasoning/Fake News/ Education/Expression/ Focus/Objectivity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Crisis of Trust/Media/ and Reason In/Values/ the Digital Age./Trust/ Judgement/Accuracy/ Reasoning/Fake News/ Education/Expression/ Focus/Objectivity DEMOCRACY/EXPLAIN/ CONNECT/ DISCOURSE/ INTERNET/MESSAGES/ NATURE OR NURTURE: A CRISIS OF TRUST/MEDIA/ AND REASON IN/VALUES/ THE DIGITAL AGE./TRUST/ JUDGEMENT/ACCURACY/ REASONING/FAKE NEWS/ EDUCATION/EXPRESSION/ FOCUS/OBJECTIVITY Nature or Nurture: A Crisis of Trust and Reason in the Digital Age Tim Cooper and Jem Thomas Published in Great Britain in 2019 by Albany Associates Tintagel House 92 Albert Embankment London SE1 7TY www.albanyassociates.com Copyright © Albany Associates 2019 Printed in the UK by BookPrintingUK All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the copyright owner of this book. ISBN 978-1-5272-5191-5 Nature or Nurture: A Crisis of Trust and Reason in the Digital Age About the authors Tim Cooper studied Astrophysics at University College London, Philosophy of Science in Bologna, Italy, and has a PhD in the History of Science from the University of Manchester. He has worked for the OSCE, the UN and the British Government in Bosnia, Kosovo and Lebanon as a political adviser and media expert. Over the last decade he has worked for the two principal European Union Agencies dealing with migration and asylum as a researcher and analyst. Jem Thomas is Director of Training and Research at Albany Associates. He has over 15 years of global experience working in complex and politically divisive communications environments, from the Western Balkans to East Africa. Originally a qualified engineer officer in the Royal Navy, academically he also has Masters degrees in political sciences from the Universities of Cambridge and St Andrews and a Post-Graduate Diploma in Social Science Research Methods from University College London. Nature or Nurture: A Crisis of Trust and Reason in the Digital Age Foreword By Sir Robert Fry The End of History seems a distant memory now. Francis Fukuyama’s 1989 essay, expanded into book form and published in 1992, saw a world approaching an end point of humanity’s sociocultural development and a final, universal form of government. That humanity is not so easily corralled and government not so easily defined may not surprise us; indeed, we may be encouraged by the unpredictable vitality both continue to show, but it is remarkable that what at the time looked like a moment of epochal triumph for the West now looks so much more complex, divisive and confusing. Neither has history stood still in the 21st Century. A financial crisis with few historical precedents and the Wars of 9/11 have completely changed the global landscape, aided and abetted by a revolution in communications that has to look back to the invention of the printing press to find anything of comparable significance. Brexit, Trump and concepts like illiberal democracy are symptoms rather than causes of a new normal in which fake news, hate speech and computational propaganda have entered the language and are the everyday currency of communications. Taking the long view, we may be at one of those millennial moments where fundamental value is redefined. Feudal societies were defined by the ownership of land and the consequential relationship between aristocrat and peasant. In the same way, industrial societies were defined by the ownership of capital and the consequential relationship between capitalist and proletarian. Perhaps digital societies will be defined by the ownership of data and the consequential relationship between Mark Zuckerberg and the rest of us. If so, we are only at the start of a long process and the sooner we understand the new rules of the game, the better. Commentators have tried their best to write the new rulebook. Thomas Piketty has addressed the economics in Capital in the 21st Century; Niall Ferguson has tried to put some shape on the societal implications in The Square and the Tower; Roger Eatwell and Matthew Goodwin have looked at the politics in National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy and Douglas Murray has explored the sociology in The Madness of Crowds. To this growing canon, Albany Associates has now made a short but significant contribution. Significant because it blends the experience of a company that makes its living in the toughest of communications environments with the intellectual curiosity of its two authors, Tim Cooper and Jem Thomas. At the seam of several academic disciplines and the real world of communications practice, Cooper and Thomas bring a rigorous analysis which guides us through a new normal where every prejudice has its own echo chamber and it is far easier to have pre-conception confirmed than challenged by open debate. Above all, they make the vital point that the debate is fundamentally about human response and not technological determination, and, in doing so, they remind us of the responsibility we all have to play a role in shaping our future. London, October 2019 Nature or Nurture: A Crisis of Trust and Reason in the Digital Age Table of Contents Abstract .................................................................................................. 5 Introduction ........................................................................................... 7 The problem .................................................................................................................................. 7 Analysis ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Psycho-social characteristics ............................................................................................ 8 Contemporary information ecology ............................................................................. 8 Political communications .................................................................................................... 9 Belief and how to change it ............................................................................................... 9 Outline of the text ................................................................................................................... 10 Part one: The new normal ................................................................... 11 Nationalism, globalism and inequality .................................................................... 11 Confidence in institutions .................................................................................................. 16 The return of populism ........................................................................................................ 22 Polarisation ................................................................................................................................. 26 The return of hate speech ................................................................................................. 29 Immigration ................................................................................................................................ 32 Terrorism ....................................................................................................................................... 35 Post-truth world ....................................................................................................................... 36 The big picture .......................................................................................................................... 38 Part two: The psycho-social basis ....................................................... 41 Economics or psychology? ................................................................................................ 41 Frames, availability, emotion, risk and priming ................................................ 47 Political opinions ...................................................................................................................... 51 Authoritarianism ..................................................................................................................... 54 Economics and normative threat ................................................................................ 59 1 Status threat ............................................................................................................................... 63 Polarisation ................................................................................................................................. 65 Motivated reasoning ............................................................................................................ 69 Unhealthy scepticism ........................................................................................................... 75 Trust .................................................................................................................................................. 76 Social capital .............................................................................................................................. 81 Immigration, diversity and prejudice ........................................................................ 84 The big picture .......................................................................................................................... 85 Part three: Information ecology in the digital age .............................. 89 Individual humans as consumers ................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Critical Discourse Analysis of Childhood Resilience and the Politics of Teaching Resilience to "Kids at Risk
    REWRITING RESILIENCE: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF CHILDHOOD RESILIENCE AND THE POLITICS OF TEACHING RESILIENCE TO "KIDS AT RISK by SHEILA MARTINEAU BA, The University of Toronto, 1993 "V A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Educational Studies) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April 1999 © Sheila Martineau, 1999 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Educational Studies The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date: y 11 ABSTRACT HIS STUDY IS A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE DISCOURSE ON CHILDHOOD RESILIENCE and the politics of teaching resilience to "kids at risk" in inner-city schools. Resiliency research is Trooted in the early psychology studies of children's coping and competence. By the 1970s, researchers were observing children who appeared invulnerable to traumatic events. These children were later described as resilient, and resilience was defined as bouncing back from adversity. Today, resilience has become an ideological code for social conformity and academic achievement. My analysis problematizes "childhood resilience" and "teaching resilience" and examines two dangerous shifts in the mainstream resiliency research over the past several decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakoff's Theory of Moral Reasoning in Presidential Campaign
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Communication Studies Communication Studies, Department of 11-2013 Lakoff’s Theory of Moral Reasoning in Presidential Campaign Advertisements, 1952–2012 Damien S. Pfister University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Jessy J. Ohl University of Mary Washington, [email protected] Marty Nader Nebraska Wesleyan University, [email protected] Dana Griffin Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/commstudiespapers Part of the American Politics Commons, and the Rhetoric Commons Pfister, Damien S.; Ohl, Jessy J.; Nader, Marty; and Griffin,a D na, "Lakoff’s Theory of Moral Reasoning in Presidential Campaign Advertisements, 1952–2012" (2013). Papers in Communication Studies. 53. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/commstudiespapers/53 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Communication Studies, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Communication Studies by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Communication Studies 64:5 (November-December 2013; Special Issue: Consistency and Change in Political Campaign Communication: Ana- lyzing the 2012 Elections), pages 488-507; doi: 10.1080/10510974.2013.832340 Copyright © 2013 Central States Communication Association; published by Tay- digitalcommons.unl.edu lor & Francis Group. Used by permission. Published online October 18, 2013. Lakoff’s Theory of Moral Reasoning in Presidential Campaign Advertisements, 1952–2012 Jessy J. Ohl,1 Damien S. Pfister,1 Martin Nader,2 and Dana Griffin 1 Department of Communication Studies, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2 Department of Political Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Corresponding author — Jessy J.
    [Show full text]
  • AAPOR Program 07.Indd
    American Association for Public Opinion Research 62nd Annual Conference Of Polls and Policy Hyatt Regency Orange County May 17-20, 2007 Anaheim, California 62nd Annual Conference May 17-20, 2007 Hyatt Regency Orange County 11999 Harbor Boulevard • Garden Grove, CA 92840 Phone: 714.750.1234 • Guest Fax: 714.971.1721 • www.hyattoc.com TABLE OF CONTENTS AAPOR Schedule of Events . 3 General Information AAPOR & WAPOR Executive Councils . 47 AAPOR Executive Offi ce Staff . 49 Chapter Presidents . 49 Past Presidents / AAPOR Honorary Life Members . 50 Committees . 51 Awards . 54 Conference Sponsors . 55 Technology & Software Exhibitors . 57 Publishers / Book Exhibitors . 57 Contributors . 58 Conference Abstracts . 63 Index . .175 Ads . 185 Maps . inside back cover / back cover Registration/Information Desk Badges/Tickets The AAPOR registration and information desk is located Name badges are provided for all registered meeting in the Royal Ballroom Foyer. All attendees must check in at attendees, exhibitors, speakers and staff. Badges are the registration desk to pick up their conference program, required to gain admittance to all sessions, social events, name badge, and other meeting materials prior to attending and the exhibit hall. Tickets will be collected at each core sessions or social events. Tickets for admittance to the meals meal function. Be sure to bring your ticket with you to are included in the registration packet. the door for admittance. Registration hours are as follows: Wednesday, May 16 . 12:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. Thursday, May 17 . 7:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Friday, May 18 . 7:30 a.m. – 4:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beckley Foundation Global Drug Policy Seminar 2005
    THE BECKLEY FOUNDATION SOCIETY & DRUGS: A RATIONAL PERSPECTIVE PARTICIPANTS ATTENDING SEMINAR V: GLOBAL DRUG POLICY SEMINAR 2005 20-22 NOVEMBER 2005 SPEAKERS Dr. David Bewley-Taylor Senior Lecturer, Department of American Studies, University of Wales, UK Prof. Colin Blakemore Chief Executive, Medical Research Council, Waynflete Professor of Physiology, Oxford University, UK Prof. Alastair Campbell Director, Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, UK Dr. Anindya Chatterjee Senior Adviser, Prevention and Public Policy, Policy, Evidence and Partnerships Department, UNAIDS Paul Goggins M. P. Parliamentary Under Secretary for Drugs and Serious and Organised Crime, Home Office, UK Prof. Leslie Iversen Professor of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, UK Andrew Jackson Deputy Director, Foresight Directorate, Office of Science and Technology, Department of Trade and Industry, UK Robert Kampia Executive Director, Marijuana Policy Project (MPP), USA Prof. Mark Kleiman Professor of Public Policy, University of California Los Angeles, USA Prof. Robert MacCoun Professor of Law and Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, USA Lord Mancroft Spokesman on drugs in the House of Lords. Chairman of the Drug and Alcohol Foundation, UK Prof. John Marsden Senior Lecturer in Addictive Behaviour, Institute of Psychiatry, UK Amanda Lady Neidpath Director, The Beckley Foundation, Co-Director, Beckley Foundation Drug Policy Programme, UK THE BECKLEY FOUNDATION, BECKLEY PARK, OXFORD OX3 9SY TEL: 01865 351209 E-MAIL: [email protected] Prof. David Nichols Professor of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University, USA Prof. David Nutt Chairman of the Technical Committee, Advisory Council of the Misuse of Drugs, Professor of Pychopharmacology, Bristol University, UK Prof. Peter Reuter Professor, School of Public Policy and Department of Criminology, University of Maryland, USA Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideology in the Age of Mediatised Politics: from 'Belief Systems'
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by LSE Research Online Angelos Kissas Ideology in the age of mediatised politics: from ‘belief systems’ to the re- contextualizing principle of discourse Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Kissas, Angelos (2017) Ideology in the age of mediatised politics: from ‘belief systems’ to the re- contextualizing principle of discourse. Journal of Political Ideologies, 22 (2). pp. 197-215. ISSN 1356-9317 DOI: 10.1080/13569317.2017.1306958 © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/76952/ Available in LSE Research Online: May 2017 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. 1 Ideology in the age of mediatised politics: From ‘belief systems’ to the re-contextualizing principle of discourse Angelos Kissas, Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science [email protected] To cite this article: Kissas, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Parenting and Politics: Exploring Early Moral Bases of Political Orientation
    Journal of Social and Political Psychology jspp.psychopen.eu | 2195-3325 Original Research Reports Parenting and Politics: Exploring Early Moral Bases of Political Orientation Ronnie Janoff-Bulman* a, Nate C. Carnes a, Sana Sheikh b [a] Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA. [b] School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, Fife, UK. Abstract Based on Lakoff’s (2002) Strict Father and Nurturant Parent metaphors for political conservatism and liberalism respectively, two studies explored parenting styles, political ideology, and the moral orientations that might link the two. Restrictive parenting (by both mother and father) predicted political conservatism, and this path was mediated by a strong Social Order orientation (Study 1) reflecting, more broadly, an inhibition-based proscriptive morality (Study 2). Political liberalism was associated with a Social Justice orientation, but was not predicted by nurturant parenting in either study. Study 1 included mothers’ reports of their own parenting, and these were correlated with the students’ responses. Findings support a restrictive moral underpinning for conservatism, but raise questions about the assumed unique association between parental nurturance and political liberalism, which is addressed in the discussion. Keywords: parenting, politics, morality, liberal, conservative Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2014, Vol. 2(1), 43±60, doi:10.5964/jspp.v2i1.243 Received: 2013-07-31. Accepted: 2014-03-07. Published (VoR): 2014-03-21. Handling Editor: Johanna Ray Vollhardt, Department of Psychology, Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA *Corresponding author at: Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003. E-mail: [email protected] This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Multilevel Governance and Development
    Multilevel Governance and Development Ryan Wilson The Myth of Political Reason - The Moral and Emotional Foundations of Political Cognition and US Politics SRE-Discussion-2019/02 2019 1 The Myth of Political Reason The Moral and Emotional Foundations of Political Cognition and US Politics Ryan Wilson Master Thesis Socio-Ecological Economics and Policy 2018 2 Abstract The current ascendancy of right-wing populists across western democracies is a concerning trend, and so far, the left has not managed to mount an effective counterstrategy to arrest its momentum. Much of the rhetoric of these right-wing populists has focused on evoking fear and suspicion, verging on hatred, of outsiders and fellow countrymen and women with opposing political ideologies, to great effect. The importance of understanding why certain rhetoric is effective cannot be understated, and the works of George Lakoff, Jonathan Haidt, and Drew Westen that illuminate the moral and emotional factors behind how individuals interpret and respond to inputs of a political nature are reviewed and synthesised. Individuals’ underlying moral mental structures and the emotional responses that they can trigger must be understood in order to generate political messaging that resonates strongly with its target audience and consequently increases the likelihood of their actuation to vote. The recent phenomenon of individualisation, stemming from the current era of reflexive modernity is analysed within the context of divergent conservative and liberal moral matrices, and is found to be disproportionately ailing the liberal side of politics. In delineating the key elements of liberal and conservative morality, the existence of liberal moral tenets that are discordant with longstanding liberal communitarian ideals were revealed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nation Under Joint Custody: How Conflicting Family Models Divide US Politics
    A Nation under Joint Custody: How Conflicting Family Models divide US Politics By Eva Elisabeth Wehling A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor George Lakoff, Co-chair Professor Terry Regier, Co-chair Professor Eve Sweetser Professor Thomas Shannon Spring 2013 Abstract A Nation under Joint Custody: How Conflicting Family Models divide US Politics by Eva Elisabeth Wehling Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professor George Lakoff, Co-chair Professor Terry Regier, Co-chair Across the globe and throughout history, politics are regularly divided into “left-leaning” and “right-leaning” camps. Explaining the sources of this conservative-liberal divide has become a major quest in the cognitive and social sciences. Early attempts have focused on self- interest as a possible explanation. However, as the self-interest hypothesis repeatedly failed, researchers’ belief in its explanatory power dwindled. Recent investigations have thus begun to tap into genetic material, personality traits, psychological needs, and moral concerns as possible explanations. One early account of the moral underpinnings that guide conservative and liberal politics is Moral Politics Theory (Lakoff, 1996). It proposes that conservatives and liberals endorse different moral worldviews, which conceptually unify their positions on issues as diverse as abortion, education, the economy, or the environment. Those worldviews are grounded in different beliefs about ideal parenting: conservatives endorse a strict-father and liberals a nurturant-parent model. The theory proposes that parenting beliefs are mapped onto national politics via the NATION AS FAMILY metaphor, and that language use in synch with the two models can significantly influence people’s perception of political issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio 314 Animal Behv Bio314new
    NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COURSE CODE: BIO 314: COURSE TITLE: ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR xii i BIO 314: ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR Course Writers/Developers Miss Olakolu Fisayo Christie Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research, No 3 Wilmot Point Road, Bar-beach Bus-stop, Victoria Island, Lagos, Nigeria. Course Editor: Dr. Adesina Adefunke Ministry of Health, Alausa. Lagos NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA xii i BIO 314 COURSE GUIDE Introduction Animal Behaviour (314) is a second semester course. It is a two credit units compustory course which all students offering Bachelor of Science (BSc) in Biology must take. This course deals with the theories and principles of adaptive behaviour and evolution of animals. The course contents are history of ethology. Reflex and complex behaviour. Orientation and taxes. Fixed action patterns, releasers, motivation and driver. Displays, displacement activities and conflict behaviour. Learning communication and social behaviour. The social behaviour of primates. Hierarchical organization. The physiology of behaviour. Habitat selection, homing and navigation. Courtship and parenthood. Biological clocks. What you will learn in this course In this course, you have the course units and a course guide. The course guide will tell you briefly what the course is all about. It is a general overview of the course materials you will be using and how to use those materials. It also helps you to allocate the appropriate time to each unit so that you can successfully complete the course within the stipulated time limit. The course guide also helps you to know how to go about your Tutor-Marked-Assignment which will form part of your overall assessment at the end of the course.
    [Show full text]
  • MINDSCAPES MINDSCAPES More INDEX CONTENTS THEMES GO BACK JOTTER Help KNOWHOW> the MIND in ACTION> MINDSCAPES
    INDEX CONTENTS THEMES GO BACK JOTTER Help KNOWHOW> THE MIND IN ACTION> MINDSCAPES MINDSCAPES more Caption TIME INC INDEX CONTENTS THEMES GO BACK JOTTER Help KNOWHOW> THE MIND IN ACTION> MINDSCAPES How can mind know mind? Even though, as the quotation opposite suggests, mind is ulti- mately out of reach, throughout history, and especially in recent years, there have been strenuous attempts both to understand how the mind works and to make maps of it. If ‘mind’ were only an obscure academic, scientific, or I continue with five more detailed presentations of religious notion, then it might not matter much, but the current mindscapes. evolving knowledge about mind continues to affect and Introduction shape action in the world and is often used to legitimize Schore: Attachment power and authority—what are, or are not, the legitimate Damasio: The biology of consciousness contents of mind? Who is, for example, ‘not in their right Lakoff: Embodied metaphor mind’? Or what is, or is not, a ‘healthy mind’? Mind matters, Heron: Psyche and personhood as for example, Salman Rushdie found with Satanic Verses, Gazzaniga: Mind and evolution and the millions of people in the UK and elsewhere who use anti-depressants know only too well. I end with a Critical review of these five models. This section gathers together several early mindscapes. Vedanta Psyche Aristotle Boethius Roman Christian Reformation They are followed by several modern mindscapes Descartes Newton As a sword Telephone exchange cannot cut Computers itself, or as a Holograms finger can- Freud not touch its Complexity Theory more own tip, Mind cannot more see itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump's Portrayals of Latin American Immigrants in the 2016 Election
    PINEDA 1 Yessica Pineda PSC 393 Professor May March 1, 2020 Trump’s Portrayals of Latin American Immigrants in the 2016 Election The 2016 Election in the United States was seen to be drastically different from any past elections simply due to the fact that for the first time in history, one of the candidates did not have any experience within the political field. The Republican candidate, Donald Trump, was nothing more than a businessman and television personality before he was elected as the forty- fifth president of the United States in 2016. One of the biggest aspects of his overall campaign was the creation of a said wall along the Southern border to decrease and possibly put an end to mass incoming immigration from Mexico. Through his use of language, President Trump portrayed the Mexican immigrants to be a sort of plague that the United States had to immediately get rid of. Due to this proposed policy, President Trump received mass votes which won him the election. Although this seems to be quite irrational, when analyzed through George Lakoff’s, Moral Politics, it begins to make sense. In George Lakoff’s, Moral Politics, Lakoff pursues to articulate the cognitive linguistics framework through his theory of metaphor. According to Lakoff, “ One of the most fundamental results in cognitive science…most of our thought is unconscious…In recent years my work has centered on two components of conceptual systems: conceptual metaphors and categories” (Lakoff, 4). Through this statement, it can be seen that PINEDA 2 Lakoff’s theory of metaphor revolves around the fact that individuals tend to think in metaphor form unconsciously.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Campaigning Begins As Candidates Are Announced
    @yorknouse • /yorknouse • @yorknouse • www.nouse.co.uk The greatest show? YUSU Elections Dissecting the Super Bowl half-time show See the supplement inside for a and this year’s headline performances M.12 breakdown of this year’s races The UK’s best designed student newspaper 2018 Est. 1964 Tuesday 12 February 2019 Nouse No. 484 Performance groups express anger over lack of campus space • Prominent societies on campus have expressed their growing frustration at the sparsity of venues • Select shows have been forced off campus while others have been burdened with high costs lack of facilities has meant we’ve had to relocate our spring and sum- Joseph Silke mer shows. In terms of getting the EDITOR people of York to come and see our shows this is great, but it really hin- ders and makes it more difficult for PERFORMANCE societies have students to come and support other told Nouse of their growing frustra- students’ work.” They added that tion at the dire lack of performance the lack of space has mainly affected space on campus. their showcases, with only Central Some of York’s most prominent Hall providing the adequate capac- student groups, including: the Cen- ity on-campus. tral Hall Musical Society (CHMS), “CHMS has around 200 mem- Dance Society (DanceSoc), and the bers now,” they said, “and over the Technical Theatre Society (TechSoc) past year we have had between 80- Central Hall Musical Society have been forced to use the Joseph Rowntree Theatre due to renovations have highlighted the significant is- 90 people get involved with our sues they have faced securing ap- showcases.
    [Show full text]