DOCSLIB.ORG

Armenia 2Nd Evaluation Report Public

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Armenia 2Nd Evaluation Report Public Strasbourg, 15 January 2014 ECRML (2014) 2 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES APPLICATION OF THE CHARTER IN ARMENIA 3rd monitoring cycle A. Report of the Committee of Experts on the Charter B. Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the application of the Charter by Armenia The European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages provides for a control mechanism to evaluate how the Charter is applied in a State Party with a view to, where necessary, making recommendations for improving its legislation, policy and practices. The central element of this procedure is the Committee of Experts, set up under Article 17 of the Charter. Its principal purpose is to report to the Committee of Ministers on its evaluation of compliance by a Party with its undertakings, to examine the real situation of regional or minority languages in the State and, where appropriate, to encourage the Party to gradually reach a higher level of commitment. To facilitate this task, the Committee of Ministers adopted, in accordance with Article 15, paragraph 1, an outline for periodical reports that a Party is required to submit to the Secretary General. The report should be made public by the State. This outline requires the State to give an account of the concrete application of the Charter, the general policy for the languages protected under Part II and, in more precise terms, all measures that have been taken in application of the provisions chosen for each language protected under Part III of the Charter. The Committee of Experts’ first task is therefore to examine the information contained in the periodical report for all the relevant regional or minority languages on the territory of the State concerned. The Committee of Experts’ role is to evaluate the existing legal acts, regulations and real practice applied in each State for its regional or minority languages. It has established its working methods accordingly. The Committee of Experts gathers information from the respective authorities and from independent sources within the State, so as to attempt to obtain a fair and just overview of the real language situation. After a preliminary examination of an initial periodical report, the Committee of Experts submits, if necessary, a number of questions to each Party to obtain supplementary information from the authorities on matters it considers insufficiently developed in the report itself. This written procedure is usually followed up by an on-the-spot visit by a delegation of the Committee of Experts to the State in question. During this visit the delegation meets bodies and associations whose work is closely related to the use of the relevant languages, and consults the authorities on matters that have been brought to its attention. This information-gathering process is designed to enable the Committee of Experts to evaluate more effectively the application of the Charter in the State concerned. Having concluded this process, the Committee of Experts adopts its own report. This report is submitted to the Committee of Ministers, together with suggestions for recommendations that the latter may decide to address to the State Party. 2 Contents A. Report of the Committee of Experts on the application of the Charter in Armenia ................................................................................... 4 Chapter 1 Background information .......................................................................... 4 1.1 The Charter’s ratification by Armenia ................................................................. 4 1.2. The work of the Committee of Experts ............................................................... 4 1.3 Particular issues arising from the evaluation of the application of the Charter in Armenia ........................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Presentation of the regional or minority language situation: update................... 5 Chapter 2 Conclusions of the Committee of Experts on how the State authorities have reacted to the recommendations of the Committee of Ministers RecChL(2009)4 ..................................................................... 7 Chapter 3 The Committee of Experts’ evaluation in respect of Parts II and III of the Charter ................................................................................................ 8 3.1. The evaluation in respect of Part II of the Charter ............................................. 8 3.2. The evaluation in respect of Part III of the Charter .......................................... 12 3.2.1 Assyrian ....................................................................................................... 12 3.2.2 Greek ........................................................................................................... 26 3.2.3 Kurdish ........................................................................................................ 40 3.2.4 Russian ....................................................................................................... 52 3.2.5 Yezidi ........................................................................................................... 58 Chapter 4 Findings of the Committee of Experts in the third monitoring cycle .. 70 Appendix I: Instrument of ratification ...................................................................................................... 72 Appendix II: Comments from the Armenian authorities ......................................................................... 73 B. Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the application of the Charter by Armenia .......................... 85 3 A. Report of the Committee of Experts on the application of the Charter in Armenia adopted by the Committee of Experts on 20 June 2013 and presented to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 16 of the Charter Chapter 1 Background information 1.1 The Charter’s ratification by Armenia 1. The Republic of Armenia signed the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages (hereafter referred to as the Charter) on 11 May 2001 and deposited its instrument of ratification on 25 January 2002. The Charter entered into force in respect of Armenia on 1 May 2002. 2. The instrument of ratification is set out in Appendix I of this report. 1.2. The work of the Committee of Experts 3. Armenia’s third periodical report was due on 12 February 2011, but was presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe only on 11 October 2012. This report was made public on the website of the government, after being sent to the Council of Europe. 4. This third evaluation report is based on the information obtained by the Committee of Experts from the third periodical report of Armenia as well as from meetings held with representatives of the minority language speakers and the Armenian authorities during the on-the-spot visit, which took place from 5-7 March 2013. 5. The present report contains detailed observations and recommendations which the Armenian authorities are encouraged to take into account when developing their policy on regional or minority languages. On this basis, the Committee of Experts has also established a list of proposals for recommendations to be addressed to Armenia by the Committee of Ministers, as provided in Article 16 (4) of the Charter. 6. The present report was adopted by the Committee of Experts on 20 June 2013. 1.3 Particular issues arising from the evaluation of the application of the Charter in Armenia Reporting 7. The Committee of Experts regrets that the third periodical report was submitted by Armenia with a delay of nearly 20 months and that it does not always provide comprehensive and updated information on the application of the Charter. The information in the report is frequently too general to permit the Committee of Experts to reach a conclusion on the fulfilment of each undertaking. The Committee of Experts was also informed that the report was drafted without consulting the minority associations. This also affected the quality of the information presented in the report, as the views of and information from the speakers were not reflected in the content of the report. As the absence of comprehensive information hampers the effectiveness of the monitoring, the Committee of Experts encourages the Armenian authorities to include in their fourth periodical report concrete practical information on the application of all undertakings in respect of each minority language, as well as to ensure that the contributions from the speakers are presented in an appropriate way. 4 8. In order for the monitoring mechanisms to function properly, it is vital for States Parties to respect the integrity and independence of the members of the monitoring committees. During this monitoring period, the Armenian member of the Committee of Experts was told to refrain from attending a committee meeting, without any valid reason given. In the view of the Committee of Experts it is regrettable if governments unduly hamper the work of independent Council of Europe monitoring mechanisms. The Committee of Experts insists that experts appointed to the Committee should be free to act independently and should not be subject to any sanctions or restrictions in performing their activities regarding the Charter. Any other practices would be inconsistent with the principle of diligent implementation of commitments undertaken by the State
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WP2. Existing and Prospected Small Hydro Power Plants in the Caucasus and Carpathians
    WP2. Existing and prospected small hydro power plants in the Caucasus and Carpathians Contents 1. Armenia. SMALL HYDRO SECTOR........................................................................... 2 1.1. Overall information on SHP sector. State-of-the-art ...........................................................2 1.2. Examples of successful implemented projects.....................................................................8 1.2.1. Small Hydropower plant on Yerevan Lake..................................................................8 1.2.2. Small Hydropower plant “Yeghegis – 1” ..................................................................10 1.3. Prospected SHPs................................................................................................................14 1.3.1. Hydropower potential of small rivers ........................................................................14 1.3.2. Prospected Small hydropower stations ......................................................................15 1.4. Pre- feasibility studies for SHP plants in Armenia ............................................................18 1 1. Armenia. SMALL HYDRO SECTOR 1.1. Overall information on SHP sector. State-of-the-art Armenia has recently succeeded in stabilising the national energy sector. After dramatically energy “cut-offs” and nature disasters in 90th, the energy sector in Armenia has been developing rapidly, partly pushed by the re- incommissiong of the national nuclear power station. Last information on energy production
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Sixth National Report
    SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity EXECUTIVE SUMMERY The issues concerning the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity of the Republic of Armenia are an important and integral part of the country's environmental strategy that are aimed at the prevention of biodiversity loss and degradation of the natural environment, ensuring the biological diversity and human well- being. Armenia's policy in this field is consistent with the following goals set out in the 2010-2020 Strategic Plan of the Convention on Biological Diversity (hereinafter CBD): 1. Address the underlying causes of biodiversity loss by mainstreaming biodiversity across government and society 2. Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use 3. To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity 4. Enhance the benefits to all from biodiversity and ecosystem services (hereinafter ES) 5. Enhance implementation through participatory planning, knowledge management and capacity building. The government of the Republic of Armenia approved ''the Strategy and National Action Plan of the Republic of Armenia on Conservation, Protection, Reproduction and Use of Biological Diversity'' (BSAP) in 2015 based on the CBD goals and targets arising thereby supporting the following directions of the strategy of the Republic of Armenia on biodiversity conservation and use: 2 Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity 1. Improvement of legislative and institutional frameworks related to biodiversity. 2. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem conservation and restoration of degraded habitats. 3. Reduction of the direct pressures on biodiversity and promotion of sustainable use.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]
  • <Div Style="Position:Absolute;Top:293;Left
    RA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE YEREVAN STATE LINGUISTIC UNIVERSITY AFTER V. BRUSOV LANGUAGE EDUCATION POLICY PROFILE COUNTRY REPORT ARMENIA YEREVAN 2008 The report was prepared within the framework of Armenia-Council of Europe cooperation The group was established by the order of the RA Minister of Education and Science (N 210311/1012, 05.11.2007) Members of the working group Souren Zolyan – Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor Yerevan Brusov State Linguistic University (YSLU), Rector, National overall coordinator, consultant Melanya Astvatsatryan– Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor YSLU, Head of the Chair of Pedagogy and Foreign Language Methodology Project Director (Chapters 1-3; 5; 10; 12) Aida Topuzyan – Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Docent YSLU, Chair of Pedagogy and Foreign Language Methodology (Chapter 8.2 – 8.5, 9.4) Nerses Gevorgyan – Ministry of Education and Science, YSLU, UNESCO Chair on Education Management and Planning (Chapter 11), Head of Chair Gayane Terzyan - YSLU, Chair of Pedagogy and Foreign Language Methodology (Chapters 4; 6; 7; 8.1) Serob Khachatryan – National Institute for Education, Department of Armenology and Socio-cultural Subjects (Chapter 9.1-9.3, 9.5-9.6) Karen Melkonyan, RA MES, Centre for Educational Programmes, Project expert Araik Jraghatspanyan – YSLU, Chair of English Communication, Project translator Bella Ayunts – YSLU, Chair of Pedagogy and Foreign Language Methodology, Project assistant LANGUAGE EDUCATION POLICY PROFILE COUNTRY REPORT - ARMENIA I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. PROJECT GOALS 2. COUNCIL OF EUROPE LANGUAGE EDUCATION POLICY: GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PRINCIPLES 3. REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA General information 3.1. Geographical position 3.2. RA administrative division 3.3. Demographic data 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Analysis of the Broadcast Licensing Competition Results of December 2010
    YEREVAN PRESS CLUB FRIEDRICH EBERT FOUNDATION EXPERT ANALYSIS OF THE BROADCAST LICENSING COMPETITION RESULTS OF DECEMBER 2010 REPORT Yerevan 2011 YEREVAN PRESS CLUB www.ypc.am 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 FOREWORD GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY 6 LEGAL GROUNDS AND PRACTICE OF ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING LICENSING COMPETITIONS 10 RESULTS OF THE EXAMINATION OF BIDS BASED ON THE CRITERIA ESTABLISHED BY THE LAW 14 1. THE PREVALENCE OF OWN AND DOMESTIC PROGRAMS 14 2. VALIDITY OF THE BUSINESS PLAN OF THE TELEVISION COMPANY AND FINANCIAL CAPACITIES OF THE BIDDER 18 3. THE CAPACITY TO PROMOTE PLURALISM 24 4. TECHNICAL CAPACITIES OF THE BIDDER 26 5. PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND OF THE STAFF 31 6. RESULTS OF THE SURVEY ON FOUNDERS OF LEGAL ENTITIES PARTICIPATING IN THE COMPETITION 38 RECOMMENDATIONS 46 ANNEX 48 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY From March to June 2011, a group of experts invited by Yerevan Press Club (YPC) has conducted an expert analysis of the organization and implementation process of the competitions for digital broadcast licensing, as well as of the submitted bids by the TV companies and the competition results. The subject of the study was - the legal grounds for organizing the competitions, the competitions’ process, the applications presented to participate in them and the decisions on determining the winners rendered by National Commission on Television and Radio (NCTR). As a result of the study, the group has made the following main conclusions: 1. Amendments made to the RA Law “On Television and Radio” on June 10, 2010 did not ensure the development of the TV market, the holding of free, fair and transparent competitions, pluralism and diversity of TV air.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Report Submitted by Armenia Pursuant to Article 25, Paragraph 1 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities
    ACFC/SR/II(2004)010 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY ARMENIA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 24 November 2004) ACFC/SR/II(2004)010 Table of contents: Introduction SECTION 1: Practical arrangements made at national level for following up the results of the first monitoring cycle of the implementation of the Framework Convention 1. Prior to the creation of a state structure on national minorities issues 2. After creation of a state structure for national minorities issues SECTION 2: Measures taken to improve implementation of the Framework Convention in response to the resolution adopted by the Committee of Ministers in respect of Armenia 1. General Provisions 2. Demographic Landscape of the Republic of Armenia 3. Implemented measures Article by Article Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4 Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8 Article 9 Article 10 Article 11 Article 12 Article 13 Article 14 Article 15 Article 16 Article 17 Article 18 Article 19 Part 3. Answers to the Questionnaire Compiled by the Advisory Committee Concerning the Report Presented by Armenia During the Second Phase of Framework Convention Implementation Monitoring Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 Table 9 Table 10 2 ACFC/SR/II(2004)010 Introduction 1. Pursuant to paragraph 1 of Article 25 of the Framework Convention for Protection of National Minorities, the Republic of Armenia is submitting its second report on the implementation of the Convention and progress of legislative and other measures taken to give effect to the principles set out in the framework Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Հավելված N 1 Հհ Կառավարության 2011 Թվականի Մարտի 3-Ի N 220 - Ն Որոշման
    Հավելված N 1 ՀՀ կառավարության 2011 թվականի մարտի 3-ի N 220 - Ն որոշման Կ Ա Ր Գ ՀԱՅԱՍՏԱՆԻ ՀԱՆՐԱՊԵՏՈՒԹՅԱՆ ԱՇԽԱՐՀԱԳՐԱԿԱՆ ԱՆՎԱՆՈՒՄՆԵՐԻ ՌՈՒՍԵՐԵՆ ԵՎ ԱՆԳԼԵՐԵՆ ՏԱՌԱԴԱՐՁՈՒԹՅԱՆ I. ԸՆԴՀԱՆՈՒՐ ԴՐՈՒՅԹՆԵՐ 1. Սույն կարգով կանոնակարգվում են այն հիմնական դրույթները, որոնք անհրա- ժեշտ են մեկ միասնական համակարգում Հայաստանի Հանրապետության աշխարհագրական անվանումների անգլերեն և ռուսերեն հրատարակման և օգտագործման ժամանակ։ 2. Յուրաքանչյուր լեզվի համար մշակվել է մեկ մասնակի կարգ, որը հիմնականում անհրաժեշտ կլինի Հայաստանի Հանրապետության աշխարհագրական անվանումներով ռուսերեն և անգլերեն քարտեզներ, ատլասներ, գրական և տեղեկատվական նյութեր հրատարակելիս, ինչպես նաև ճանապարհային, վարչական շենքերի և այլ նպատակների համար նախատեսված ցուցանակներ տեղադրելիս։ 3. Յուրաքանչյուր լեզվով անվանման ճիշտ ձևն ամրագրվում է` համադրելով մի քանի սկզբնաղբյուր։ 4. Հայերեն աշխարհագրական անվանումները պետք է տառադարձվեն այլ լեզուներով` հիմք ընդունելով տվյալ լեզվի արտահայտման առանձնահատկությունները, առավելագույնս մոտեցնելով դրանց գրելաձևերը հայերենի արտասանության հնչողությանը։ Առանձին դեպքերում ընդունված ավանդական գրելաձևերը հասցվել են նվազագույնի։ 5. Աշխարհագրական անվանումների տառադարձությունը, որպես կանոն, կատար- վում է հայերենի ժամանակակից գրելաձևից՝ հաստատված «Հայաստանի Հանրապետության վարչատարածքային բաժանման մասինե Հայաստանի Հանրապետության օրենքով և տերմի- 11_0220 2 նաբանական կոմիտեի 1956 թվականի սեպտեմբերի, 1958 թվականի փետրվարի և 1978 թվականի փետրվարի համապատասխան որոշումներով։ Հայերենի այն հնչյունները, որոնք չունեն ռուսերեն և անգլերեն համարժեքներ, տառադարձվում են հնարավորինս ավելի մոտ
    [Show full text]
  • Seventh-Eleventh (Joint)
    Seventh-Eleventh (joint) Periodic National Report of the Republic of Armenia on Implementation of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (21 December 1965) Introduction 1. The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination was ratified by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia on 23 July 1993. Pursuant to the requirement of paragraph 1 of Article 9 of the Convention, the countries which have acceded thereto shall periodically submit a national report on implementation of the provisions of the Convention to the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. This document comprises the Seventh-Eleventh Joint Periodic Report submitted by the authorities of the Republic of Armenia. 2. The report covers the legislative, judicial, administrative and other measures undertaken by the authorities of the Republic of Armenia, which are aimed at implementing the provisions of the Convention. It has been elaborated taking into consideration the Concluding Observations, containing the concerns and recommendations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (hereinafter referred to as "the Concluding Observations"), which were submitted after the discussions on the Fifth and Sixth Joint Periodic Report of the Republic of Armenia that took place during the 78th session of the Committee from 14 February to 11 March 2011. 3. This Report has been drawn up by an inter-agency working group and coordinated by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
    [Show full text]
  • Government of the Republic of Armenia
    E2203 Public Disclosure Authorized Government of the Republic of Armenia MCA-Armenia Team Proposal for Public Disclosure Authorized Millennium Challenge Account Assistance Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental Impact Assessment of the Concept Paper Public Disclosure Authorized September 2005 Government of the Republic of Armenia Proposal for Millennium Challenge Account Assistance Environmental Impact Assessment CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................3 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL ..........................................................4 2.1. Proposed Investment Areas.......................................................................4 2.2. Current Situation of Irrigation Infrastructure and Proposed Investments...4 2.3. Current Situation of Rural Roads and Proposed Investments.................36 3. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN ARMENIA...................50 3.1. Legal Framework......................................................................................50 3.2. International Agreements .........................................................................53 3.3. Institutional Framework ............................................................................57 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS....................................................................60 4.1. “No Action” Alternative .............................................................................61 4.2. Potential Positive Impacts ........................................................................62
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Preferences and Habits of Armenian Online
    READING PREFERENCES AND HABITS OF ARMENIAN ONLINE NEWS READERS by Mariam Ghushchyan Presented to the Department of English & Communications in Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts American University of Armenia, Yerevan, Armenia May 5, 2017 Table of Contents Introduction . 3 Literature Review. 4 Research Question . 8 Methodology . 9 Research Findings and Analysis Trust toward news sources . 12 Topic preferences . 15 Headline preferences . 19 Reading habits of the Armenian online news readers . 21 Problems of Armenian Online Media . 24 Contradictions . 27 Conclusion . 29 Limitations and Avenues for Future Research . 30 References . 32 Appendices . 33 2 Introduction Online media is a relatively new source of information in Armenia. It has entered into the Armenian reality and established itself as a competitive news source among other leading outlets in the last decade. Despite their prosperity and recent popularity in Armenia, online news outlets still face several problems and are still not available to all the layers of the Armenian population. But it is undeniable that during this short period of being in the field of news media, online news websites have become a big part of people’s lives, as they are considered to be the most liberal, objective, and diverse news sources. As a non-governmental organization called Freedom House states, online media in Armenia is free, unlike print media. However, this freedom of online media also has its opposite side as it can also have negative influence, such as too many online news outlets with unprofessional attitudes and distortion of news for the sake of having a big reading audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Stepanavan District Travel Guide 2010
    MYSTERIES AND SACRED SITES OF STEPANAVAN DISTRICT TRAVEL GUIDE 2010 Taguhi Sahakyan Contents Table of Contents 1. Lori Region (p. 4 - 5) 4. Places to visit along the Gargar River (p. 12 - 14) a. Gyulagarak – Dendropark (Botanical Garden), 2. Stepanavan (p. 5 - 7) Tormakadur Church a. Stepan Shahumyan Museum b. Vardablur – St. Jgrashen Church, Vardablur's Fortress, b. St. Nshan Chapel St. Sargis Church c. Chrchran Waterfall c. Kurtan – St. Astvatsatsin Basilica (V c.), Hnevank Monastery Complex (VII c.) d. Kuybishev Lake d. Dsegh (on Debed River) – Hovhannes Tumanyan's e. Lori Berd (Fortress-town) House-Museum, St. Grigor Lusavorich Chapel (XII-XIII f. Shushanik's Fortress c.), Mamkikonyan's Medieval Cemetery, Sirun Khach g. Communist Cave (Mayori Dzor) (Beautiful Cross Stone), Bardzrakash St. Grigor h. Hovhannes Tumanyan's School Monastery (XIII c.), Gikor's Mountain Spring i. St. Sargis Church j. Amrakits (Kirov) Village of Russian Babushkas - 5. Places to visit in the north of Stepanavan (p. 14) Russian church a. Sverdlov – St. Gevorg Church (XI-XII c.) k. Lovers' Trail b. Sverdlov-Privolnoe – Dorbandavank/St. Astvatsatsin l. Tormakadur Church (VI c.) m. Dendropark (Botanical Garden) c. Privolnoe-Jiliza – Khuchap (XIII c.) and Khorakert (XI- n. Pushkin Pass XIII c.) Monasteries 3. Places to visit along the Dzoraget River (p. 9 - 12) 6. Day tours from Stepanavan along the Debed River (p. 15) a. Agarak Village – Darmanatagh, St. Astvatsatsin a. Dsegh (see above) Church (V-VI c.), Fountain Monument (X-XI c.) b. Tumanyan – Kobayr Monastery (XII – XIII c.) b. Lejan – Red Church (XIX c.) built on V c.
    [Show full text]
  • Viva Xpress Logistics (Uk)
    VIVA XPRESS LOGISTICS (UK) Tel : +44 1753 210 700 World Xpress Centre, Galleymead Road Fax : +44 1753 210 709 SL3 0EN Colnbrook, Berkshire E-mail : [email protected] UNITED KINGDOM Web : www.vxlnet.co.uk Selection ZONE FULL REPORT Filter : Sort : Group : Code Zone Description ZIP CODES From To Agent AM AMAOD00 AM - ARMENIA AOD ZORAKAN 374103 - 374103 EREVAN 375000 - 375999 BERD 377010 - 377010 TAVOUCHE 377010 - 377010 NAVARE 377011 - 377011 TCHINTCHINE 377012 - 377012 TSAKHKAVAN 377013 - 377013 PARAVACARE 377014 - 377014 TOVOUZ 377015 - 377015 VARAGAVAN 377016 - 377016 VERINE KARMRARBIOURE 377020 - 377020 NORACHEN 377021 - 377021 TCHORATANE 377022 - 377022 ARTSVABERD 377023 - 377023 AIGUEDZORE 377024 - 377024 TCHINAR 377025 - 377025 AIGUEPAR 377030 - 377030 MOVSCS 377031 - 377031 AIROUME 377100 - 377100 ARTCHIS 377101 - 377101 BAGRATACHEN 377102 - 377102 BARANIS 377104 - 377104 DEBEDAVAN 377105 - 377105 NOEMBERIANE 377110 - 377110 VOSKEVAN 377111 - 377111 VOSKEPAR 377112 - 377112 KOTI 377113 - 377113 ATAN 377114 - 377114 BAREKAMAVAN 377114 - 377114 KORBE 377115 - 377115 HARTANAK 377116 - 377116 BERDAVAN 377117 - 377117 DJOUDJEVAN 377118 - 377118 PTRAVAN 377119 - 377119 AKHTALA 377120 - 377120 CHAMLOUR 377122 - 377122 TCHOTCHKAM 377124 - 377124 CHNOR 377125 - 377125 METS AIROUM 377126 - 377126 AKOR 377130 - 377130 TOUMANIAN 377130 - 377130 TOUMANIAN BANAVAN 377133 - 377133 ODZOUN 377135 - 377135 AREVATSAG 377136 - 377136 DANOUCHAVAN 377137 - 377137 HARPAT 377138 - 377138 MRART 377139 - 377139 DSER 377140 - 377140 LOROUT 377141 - 377141
    [Show full text]