A303 Stonehenge E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A303 Stonehenge E 3 A303 Stonehenge e m Amesbury to Berwick Down u l o Report on Public Consultation V Appendix B September 2017 Responses from: Amesbury Town Council Avebury Parish Council Chitterne Parish Council Cranborne Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Durnford Parish Council Durrington Town Council Environment Agency Historic England Laverstock and Ford Parish Council Ministry of Defence (MOD) Natural England North Wessex Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Shrewton Parish Council The Parish of Berwick St James Tisbury Parish Council Wiltshire Council Wiltshire Police Winterbourne Stoke Parish Council Woodford Parish Council Amesbury Town Council From: Wendy Bown <[email protected]> Sent: 10 February 2017 14:44 To: A303Stonehenge Cc: 'Trader'; [email protected]; 'Adam Pilon' Subject: Consultation A303 Stonehenge: Amesbury to Berwick Down Please accept this as a contribution to the consultation: Statement from Amesbury Town Council on the Consultation: A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down At the Town Council meeting on 7th February 2017 a split vote – 8 votes to 7 – accepted the statement below: Amesbury Town Council considered the details of the consultation: A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down and strongly agrees to the solution of dualling the A303, including a bypass at Winterbourne Stoke and improvements to the existing junctions between the A303 and the intersecting A345 and A360. With consideration to Amesbury as a hub for surrounding villages, its residents, businesses and visitors, and with consideration of its heritage, the Town Council would state that: Serious consideration must be given to maintaining a full junction capacity at Countess Roundabout. There must be access onto and off the A303 at the roundabout, to enable traffic to continue to access and leave the town. The Town Council agrees the importance of retaining the Solstice Park junction, and it should not be altered. The Town Council has also concluded that the lack of a full A345/A303 junction capacity at Countess Roundabout would have a negative impact on the residential areas of London Road, Porton Road and Countess Road. The Town Council requests further investigation into the mitigation of noise distribution from the possible flyover (with a possibility of lowering or tunnelling) and insists that attention be paid to the preservation of the historic sites of Blick Mead and Vespasians Camp, and Grade 2 listed buildings and businesses at Countess Roundabout, particularly when calculating the land required for the creation of slip roads. Many thanks. Best wishes Wendy Bown Town Clerk Amesbury Town Council 1 Avebury Parish Council Response ID ANON-BABJ-X6PM-T Submitted to A303 Stonehenge Submitted on 2017-03-01 12:00:26 Introduction Name Name: Andrew Williamson Postcode Postcode: SN8 1RF Email Email address: [email protected] Postal address Address: Ashdown, High Street, Avebury, Wilts SN8 1RF Are you responding on behalf of an organisation? Yes If yes, which organisation?: Avebury Parish Council A303 Stonehenge - the proposed option 1. To what extent do you agree with our proposed option? Strongly disagree Please provide any comments to support your answer for question 1: Please see Avebury Parish Council's letter and response paper dated and posted 1 March 2017. For the avoidance of doubt, the Parish Council's response is: Avebury Parish Council Response to consultation on proposed A303 Expressway between Amesbury and Berwick Down. Avebury Parish Council is grateful to Highways England for attending its meeting on 7 February 2017 to give a presentation on the proposed A303 Expressway scheme. The Parish Council wishes to respond to the consultation, and to propose that an alternative scheme is explored. Avebury Parish lies entirely within the Avebury half of the Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site (WHS). The Parish Council represents the interests of local residents, employers and employees. The Council is also very aware of the importance of the WHS nationally and internationally to the 250,000 to 300,000 visitors, archaeologists, school children, faith groups, artists and many others who come to the Avebury half of the WHS each year. The integrity of the WHS is fundamental to the economic, social and cultural life of the community. It is very important internationally and is also a significant component of the economic and cultural life of Wiltshire and the nation. The Parish Council notes many of the positive and negative impacts of the proposed Expressway for the Stonehenge area. The Parish Council has endorsed the WHS Management Plan 2015 and is concerned that the primary aim of protecting the Site is observed, as set out in the Plan’s introduction. The Plan states that ‘It is essential that all change is carefully planned and that competing uses are reconciled without compromising the overriding commitment to protect the Site and maintain its OUV’ (para 1.1.7). Damage caused by the proposed A303 scheme could however result in negative impacts on the Avebury half of the WHS if: 1. UNESCO were to delist the WHS, or add it to its List of World Heritage Sites in Danger 2. a precedent is set whereby further damaging schemes in future could be built in either half of the WHS. More specifically, the Parish Council is concerned that: 1. the construction of portals at each end of the proposed tunnel together with about 1.5km of dual carriageway at surface level in the western part of the Site at Stonehenge will adversely affect a number of archaeological features and their settings. Highways England’s Technical Appraisal Report states at paragraph 18.3.39 that ‘Options D061 and D062 would result in a range of slight to very large adverse impacts on more than 60 scheduled monuments’. 2. the western portal together with roads and junctions inside and outside the WHS will: a. impact on the settings of monuments b. interfere with interrelationships between monuments c. damage or compromise more specific features, including winter solstice alignments and the unique long barrow group above the dry valley system close to the proposed western portal. 3. the Technical Appraisal Report does not include a chapter on archaeological assessment. While it includes chapters on economic, social, and other assessments, it only briefly mentions the historic environment in Chapter 18. Archaeology is fundamental to preserving WHS status and the Parish Council is very concerned at the omission of a specific chapter on the subject. The Parish Council urges that: 1. monuments, their settings and interrelationships including astronomical alignments be protected and adverse impacts on them be much reduced 2. all ICOMOS / UNESCO recommendations be included in the final design so that ICOMOS / UNESCO agreement is obtained 3. Route Option F010 is built instead of a tunnel option. The Parish Council is aware that some monuments in the WHS are 4,500 years old and believes that a test should be applied – that it should be likely that the scheme should still be seen to be an acceptable intervention in 4,500 years’ time. An alternative scheme We understand that Highways England has not explored an alternative, asymmetric, scheme that would avoid creating the proposed dual carriageway of about 1.5km, and twin portals, in the western part of the Site. But all the archaeology on the line of the proposed surface level dual carriageway would remain protected and intact, and all the costs of building this section of dual carriageway would be saved, if: 1. about 1.5km, or more, of the existing A303 running eastwards from the western boundary of the WHS was reused/recycled by converting it from a single lane highway in each direction to a one-direction pair of lanes (for say eastbound traffic) that then entered a single portal for a tunnel of 2.9km, or less, that emerged just east of The Avenue 2. a 4.5km tunnel (for say westbound traffic) was bored from just east of The Avenue to emerge at a single portal just to the west of the WHS 3. human ingenuity and experience overseas was applied to solving issues of ventilation, safety, deliverability etc. The cost of boring a single, longer tunnel might be higher, but would be largely or totally offset by a combination of: 1. a 100% saving in the cost of constructing a new, 1.5km surface-level dual carriageway 2. any savings from building a shorter (eastbound) tunnel of less than 2.9km 3. a much reduced extra-over cost of boring a longer 4.5km tunnel, given that tunnelling equipment would already be commissioned and on site 4. raising private or philanthropic money to meet some extra costs, given the strength of the WHS brand. This alternative scheme could help to protect the archaeology of the Site, meet ICOMOS and UNESCO’s requirements and ensure the acceptability of the scheme in 4,500 years’ time. 1 March 2017 Key features of the proposed option 2. To what extent do you agree with our proposed locationof the eastern portal? Don’t know Please provide any comments to support your answer for question 2: Insufficient archaeological information has been provided for the Parish Council to form an opinion. Please see Avebury Parish Council's letter and response paper dated 1 March 2017. 3. To what extent do you agree with our proposed locationof the western portal? Strongly disagree Please provide any comments to support your answer for question 3: Please see Avebury Parish Council's letter and response paper dated 1 March 2017. 4. Of the two possible routes for the Winterbourne Stoke bypass which do you consider is the best route? Not Answered Please provide any comments to support your answer for Question 4: Please see Avebury Parish Council's letter and response paper dated 1 March 2017.
Recommended publications
  • Addendum to School Places Strategy 2017-2022 – Explanation of the Differences Between Wiltshire Community Areas and Wiltshire School Planning Areas
    Addendum to School Places Strategy 2017-2022 – Explanation of the differences between Wiltshire Community Areas and Wiltshire School Planning Areas This document should be read in conjunction with the School Places Strategy 2017 – 2022 and provides an explanation of the differences between the Wiltshire Community Areas served by the Area Boards and the School Planning Areas. The Strategy is primarily a school place planning tool which, by necessity, is written from the perspective of the School Planning Areas. A School Planning Area (SPA) is defined as the area(s) served by a Secondary School and therefore includes all primary schools in the towns and surrounding villages which feed into that secondary school. As these areas can differ from the community areas, this addendum is a reference tool to aid interested parties from the Community Area/Area Board to define which SPA includes the schools covered by their Community Area. It is therefore written from the Community Area standpoint. Amesbury The Amesbury Community Area and Area Board covers Amesbury town and surrounding parishes of Tilshead, Orcheston, Shrewton, Figheldean, Netheravon, Enford, Durrington (including Larkhill), Milston, Bulford, Cholderton, Wilsford & Lake, The Woodfords and Great Durnford. It encompasses the secondary schools The Stonehenge School in Amesbury and Avon Valley College in Durrington and includes primary schools which feed into secondary provision in the Community Areas of Durrington, Lavington and Salisbury. However, the School Planning Area (SPA) is based on the area(s) served by the Secondary Schools and covers schools in the towns and surrounding villages which feed into either The Stonehenge School in Amesbury or Avon Valley College in Durrington.
    [Show full text]
  • Tilshead - Census 1861
    Tilshead - Census 1861 Relationship Year Abode Surname Given Names Status Sex Age Occupation Place of Birth Notes to Head Born RG9/1310 1 Long Street Ferris George Head M M 30 1831 Shepherd Tilshead Page 1 Long Street Ferris Jane Wife M F 28 1833 West Lavington Long Street Ferris William Son U M 3 1858 Tilshead Long Street Ferris Ann Daur U F 5 1856 Scholar Tilshead Long Street Ferris Emelia Daur U F 1 1860 Tilshead 2 Long Street Mead Thomas Head W M 59 1802 Boot & Shoe Maker West Lavington Long Street Mead Jane Daur U F 21 1840 Tilshead Long Street Mead Eliza Visitor U F 23 1838 Tilshead Long Street West John Apprentice U M 19 1842 Leigh on Mendip, Somerset Long Street Mead Thomas Visitor M M 24 1837 Shoemaker Tilshead Long Street Mead Ellan Wife M F 24 1837 Chittern Long Street Mead Edwin Son M 3 1858 Tilshead Long Street Mead Wm Son M 1 1860 Tilshead 3 Bunday David Head M M 30 1831 Agricultrial Laberour Tilshead Bunday Elizabeth Wife M F 29 1832 Tilshead Bunday James M 7 1854 Tilshead Bunday Fanny Daur F 12 1849 Tilshead Bunday Sarah Daur F 5 1856 Scholar Tilshead Bunday Elizabeth Daur F 2 1859 Scholar Tilshead Bunday Eliza Daur F 0 1861 Tilshead Age 6 mos. Asher Thomas Lodger U M 56 1805 Laberour Tilshead Payne Ann Lodger U F 88 1773 Laberour Tilshead 4 Ashley John Head M M 33 1828 Agricultrial Laberour Tilshead Ashley Ann Wife M F 34 1827 Shrewton Ashley William Son M 5 1856 Tilshead Ashley Frank Son U M 3 1858 Tilshead Page 2 Ashley Mary Daur F 10 1851 Tilshead Ashley Elen Daur F 8 1853 Tilshead 5 High Street Mathews Charlis Head
    [Show full text]
  • Dorset & South Wiltshire
    Groundwater Situation Report Wessex (Dorset & South Wiltshire) Update 12th September 2017 Current situation Current forecast risk of groundwater flooding There are currently no groundwater flood alerts for Salisbury Plain, Cranborne Chase and the West of Dorset. The latest summary of the water situation in the South West, giving details of the rainfall, groundwater levels and river flows, can found on the GOV.UK website. The link to these pages is below: August finished much drier than it started. Overall for the month the long term average (LTA) for August was ‘normal’ at 95% LTA, 62 mm. The rivers responded well to the rainfall and most flows reflect the geographical distribution of the rainfall, drier in the north and west and wetter in the south and east. Most rivers are now ‘normal’ for the time of year though South Newton on the groundwater dominated Chalk is ‘below normal’ for the time of year. The groundwater sites show a mixed response with some groundwater sites responding to the wetter than average summer, 134% LTA, whilst others on the Chalk and Greater Oolite are still ‘notably low. Several boreholes have received significant recharge this month and were still increasing at month end others while still receding are doing so at a lower rate. Sites on the Greater Oolite and Chalk are ‘notably low’ for the time of year. Many others are ‘normal’ with the exception of Kingston Russell Road, situated in the West Dorset catchment, which was ‘notably high’. In the West of Dorset, the level at the Kingston Russell borehole, on 12/09/2017, was 105.760 metres above sea level (mAOD).
    [Show full text]
  • Wiltshire Botany
    WILTSHIRE BOTANY JOURNAL OF THE WILTSHIRE BOTANICAL SOCIETY ISSUE NO. 3, February 2000 CONTENTS 1 E DITORIAL 2 The Flora of Berwick St. James Barbara Last 15 Grassland Communities on Salisbury Plain Training Area: Results of the ITE ecological survey Kevin Walker and Richard Pywell 28 The recent history of Batology in Wiltshire Rob Randall 33 Plant records 1997 35 Addition to 1996 records 36 Plant records 1998 Wiltshire Botany 3, 2000, page1 EDITORIAL Each issue of Wiltshire Botany so far has managed to break new ground. This issue contains the first village flora to be included. Barbara Last has systematically recorded the plants growing in Berwick St James, and her article gives an account of her findings. Hopefully, it will inspire others to do similar work in their own localities. Our second article is the first systematic account we have published on the vegetation of Salisbury Plain. In this case, Kevin Walker and Richard Pywell describe the grassland communities of the MoD Training Area. Kevin and Richard can be contacted at the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, Cambs., PE17 2LS. Tel. 01487 773381.Fax. 01487 773467. Email; [email protected] Innovation is complemented by continuity. Rob Randall’s article continues his account of the history of recording the many different species of bramble in Wiltshire. His account brings us more or less up to the present day. It is hoped that the next issue will contain what is effectively an up-to-date bramble flora of Wiltshire. As in previous issues, a selection of the Society’s plant records is included.
    [Show full text]
  • A303 Stonehenge E
    1 A303 Stonehenge e m Amesbury to Berwick Down u l o V Report on Public Consultation September 2017 A303 Stonehenge, Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive summary 2 Background context 2 Scheme proposals presented for consultation 2 Consultation arrangements 3 Consultation response 3 Key considerations 5 Effectiveness and benefits of consultation 6 1 Introduction 7 2 A303 Stonehenge: Amesbury to Berwick Down Scheme proposals 9 2.1 Scheme proposals 9 3 How we undertook consultation 11 3.1 When we consulted 11 3.2 Who we consulted 11 3.3 How consultation was carried out 15 4 Overview of consultation feedback 20 4.1 General 20 4.2 Breakdown of total responses 20 4.3 Questionnaire responses: Questions 1-4 21 4.4 Themes arising from comments made against Questions 1-7 23 4.5 Feedback data from Questions 8-10 24 5 Matters raised and Highways England response 27 5.1 General 27 5.2 Matters raised by the public with Highways England’s response 27 5.3 Responses by statutory bodies 107 5.4 Responses by non-statutory organisations and other groups 115 5.5 Matters raised by statutory bodies and non-statutory organisations and groups with Highways England’s response 153 5.6 Matters raised by landholders with Highways England’s response 170 6 Summary of Feedback and Key Considerations 190 6.1 Summary of consultation feedback 190 6.2 Key considerations 197 7 Conclusions 199 7.1 Purpose of the consultation 199 7.2 Summary of what was done 199 7.3 Did the consultation achieve its purpose? 201 Abbreviations List 203 Glossary 204 Appendices 207 Page 1 of 207 A303 Stonehenge, Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 Executive summary Background context The A303 Stonehenge scheme is part of a programme of improvements along the A303 route aimed at improving connectivity between London and the South East and the South West.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge Bibliography
    Bibliography Abbot, M. and Anderson-Whymark, H., 2012. Anon., 2011a, Discoveries provide evidence of Stonehenge Laser Scan: archaeological celestial procession at Stonehenge. On-line analysis report. English Heritage project source available at: 6457. English Heritage Research Report http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/news/latest/ Series no. 32-2012, available at: 2011/11/25Nov-Discoveries-provide- http://services.english- evidence-of-a-celestial-procession-at- herita ge.org.uk/Resea rch Repo rtsPdf s/032_ Stonehenge.aspx (accessed 2 April 2012). 2012WEB.pdf Anon., 2011b, Stonehenge’s sister? Current Alexander, C., 2009, If the stones could speak: Archaeology, 260, 6–7. Searching for the meaning of Stonehenge. Anon., 2011c, Home is where the heath is. National Geographic, 213.6 (June 2008), Late Neolithic house, Durrington Walls. 34–59. Current Archaeology, 256, 42–3. Allen, S., 2008, The quest for the earliest Anon., 2011d, Stonehenge rocks. Current published image of Stonehinge (sic). Archaeology, 254, 6–7. Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural Anon., 2012a, Origin of some of the Bluestone History Magazine, 101, 257–9. debris at Stonehenge. British Archaeology, Anon., 2006, Excavation and Fieldwork in 123, 9. Wiltshire 2004. Wiltshire Archaeological Anon., 2012b, Stonehenge: sourcing the and Natural History Magazine, 99, 264–70. Bluestones. Current Archaeology, 263, 6– Anon., 2007a, Excavation and Fieldwork in 7. Wiltshire 2005. Wiltshire Archaeological Aronson, M., 2010, If stones could speak. and Natural History Magazine, 100, 232– Unlocking the secrets of Stonehenge. 39. Washington DC: National Geographic. Anon., 2007b, Before Stonehenge: village of Avebury Archaeological and Historical wild parties. Current Archaeology, 208, Research Group (AAHRG) 2001 17–21.
    [Show full text]
  • WILTSHIRE Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society
    Entries in red - require a photograph WILTSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road No. Parish Location Position WI_AMAV00 SU 15217 41389 UC road AMESBURY Church Street; opp. No. 41 built into & flush with churchyard wall Stonehenge Road; 15m W offield entrance 70m E jcn WI_AMAV01 SU 13865 41907 UC road AMESBURY A303 by the road WI_AMHE02 SU 12300 42270 A344 AMESBURY Stonehenge Down, due N of monument on the Verge Winterbourne Stoke Down; 60m W of edge Fargo WI_AMHE03 SU 10749 42754 A344 WINTERBOURNE STOKE Plantation on the Verge WI_AMHE05 SU 07967 43180 A344 SHREWTON Rollestone top of hill on narrow Verge WI_AMHE06 SU 06807 43883 A360 SHREWTON Maddington Street, Shrewton by Blind House against wall on Verge WI_AMHE09 SU 02119 43409 B390 CHITTERNE Chitterne Down opp. tank crossing next to tree on Verge WI_AMHE12 ST 97754 43369 B390 CODFORD Codford Down; 100m W of farm track on the Verge WI_AMHE13 ST 96143 43128 B390 UPTON LOVELL Ansty Hill top of hill,100m E of line of trees on Verge WI_AMHE14 ST 94519 42782 B390 KNOOK Knook Camp; 350m E of entrance W Farm Barns on bend on embankment WI_AMWH02 SU 12272 41969 A303 AMESBURY Stonehenge Down, due S of monument on the Verge WI_AMWH03 SU 10685 41600 A303 WILSFORD CUM LAKE Wilsford Down; 750m E of roundabout 40m W of lay-by on the Verge in front of ditch WI_AMWH05 SU 07482 41028 A303 WINTERBOURNE STOKE Winterbourne Stoke; 70m W jcn B3083 on deep verge WI_AMWH11 ST 990 364 A303 STOCKTON roadside by the road WI_AMWH12 ST 975 356 A303 STOCKTON 400m E of parish boundary with Chilmark by the road WI_AMWH18 ST 8759 3382 A303 EAST KNOYLE 500m E of Willoughby Hedge by the road WI_BADZ08 ST 84885 64890 UC road ATWORTH Cock Road Plantation, Atworth; 225m W farm buildings on the Verge WI_BADZ09 ST 86354 64587 UC road ATWORTH New House Farm; 25m W farmhouse on the Verge Registered Charity No 1105688 1 Entries in red - require a photograph WILTSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Church in an Age of Danger: Parsons and Parishioners, 1660-1740 Donald A
    Cambridge University Press 0521353130 - The Church in an Age of Danger: Parsons and Parishioners, 1660-1740 Donald A. Spaeth Index More information INDEX Abingdon (Berks.), 90 ars moriendi, 222 Act for the Better Maintenance of Curates Articles of Religion, 5, 153, 177 (1714), 38 Ashe, Samuel, 40 Act for the Better Observation of the Lord’s Aske, Nathaniel, rector of Somerford Magna, Day (1676), 189 67, 159–60, 161, 162, 165, 173, 174–6, 177, Act for the More Easy Recovery of Small 194, 196 Tithes (1696), 73, 74, 77, 78–80, 136 atheism, 180 Act of Toleration (1689), 11, 61, 64, 66, 67, Atterbury, Francis, bishop of Rochester, 63 155, 157, 160, 171, 174, 201 Atworth, 54. See also Lewis, John Act of Uniformity (1662), 19, 57, 92, 111, 113, Aubrey, John, 134, 158, 204, 207, 209, 232 114, 115, 153, 155, 166 Avebury, 78, 79, 89, 92, 134–41, 148, 149, Addison, Joseph, 11, 12, 31, 39, 41, 83 150–1. See also White, John Addison, Launcelot, rector of Milston, 12, 15, Ayliffe, Sir George, 42–3 213 Aldbourne, 166, 171 Baily, William, of Horningsham, 168 Alderbury, 198 bands, parish, 252, 253 Alderbury hundred, 163 baptism, 195 Aldermaston (Berks.), 217 fees, 152, 198 Alderton, 92, 102 lay, 198 alehouses, 4, 125, 181, 188 of older child, 68, 160 and good fellowship, 57 of sick infant, 197, 198, 199 licensing, 106 private, 198 unlicensed, 20, 42 social significance of, 198, 200–1 use by clergy, 33, 50, 122–3, 124, 126 Baptists, 158, 197, 202, 242 Allington, 67, 68, 69, 190, 192 Barber, Charles, vicar of Combe Bissett, 72 Amesbury, 68, 213 Barcroft,
    [Show full text]
  • English Heritage Stonehenge Visitor Enhancement Project Planning
    English Heritage Stonehenge Visitor Enhancement Project Planning Submission for Permanent Coach Visitor Facilities & Visitor Transit System Improvements Heritage Impact Assessment April 2016 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Project Background 1 1.2 Consultations 4 2.0 METHODOLOGY 5 2.1 Aims and Scope 5 2.2 Planning and Policy Context 5 2.3 Impact Assessment Methodology 9 3.0 EXISTING BASELINE CONDITIONS 15 3.1 Introduction 15 3.2 Designated Heritage Assets 15 3.3 Historic Development of the Study Area 20 3.4 Monument Groups and Outstanding Universal Value 20 3.5 Sites and Monuments within the Assessment Area 24 4.0 ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS AND MITIGATION 29 4.1 Proposed Works 29 4.2 Mitigation Strategy 32 4.3 Construction Effects 35 4.4 Operational Effects 39 5.0 EFFECTS ON THE OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE OF THE WHS 44 5.1 Introduction 44 5.2 Stonehenge and the Stonehenge Avenue 44 5.3 The Cursus 45 5.4 The Cursus Barrows 46 5.5 The Lesser Cursus and Associated Barrows 46 5.6 The Monarch of the Plain 46 6.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 48 6.1 Effects on the Outstanding Universal Value of the WHS 48 6.2 Effects on Archaeological Remains 50 SVEP Permanent Coach Park April 2016 Heritage Impact Assessment 11110205_SVEP_HIA_V2_CMdw_15-04-16 Chris Blandford Associates REFERENCES 51 GLOSSARY 52 FIGURES 1 Designated Sites and Monuments in the Study and Assessment Areas 2 Scheduled Monuments and Recorded Sites in the Assessment Area 3 Scheme Elements Re-using Previously Developed Land / Reversible Scheme Elements APPENDICES 1 Heritage Impact Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release – for Issue Wednesday 3Rd March Town And
    Press Release – For Issue Wednesday 3rd March Andover Advertiser/Bath Chronicle/BBC Wiltshire/Gazette & Herald/Wiltshire Times/Marlborough News Online/Melksham Independent News/Salisbury Journal/Wilts & Glos Standard/Swindon Advertiser/New Valley News/Western Gazette/White Horse News/Somerset Live/The Guardian/The Independent/ The Daily Telegraph/ The Observer/ The Times Town and Parish Council Continue Effort to Protect Neighbourhood Plans Wiltshire Council and Wiltshire’s MPs have declined the opportunity to meet last Friday (26th Feb) with the 30 town and parish councils seeking a joint effort to develop a shared and public plan to protect Neighbourhood Planning in Wiltshire. However, a letter to the councils from the Leader of Wiltshire Council, Philip Whitehead and the Chief Executive, Terence Herbert, confirmed Wiltshire Councils views that: • Greater clarity needs to be given to communities in the guidance about what Neighbourhood Plans can and can’t influence; • The current anomaly regarding the weight given to those over two years old in decision making must be urgently addressed; • The process of updating Neighbourhood Plans should be simplified or they should be extended to run over a longer time span, in line with the Wiltshire Local Plan; • The current situation where neighbourhood plans are being made increasing less valid over time and requiring frequent updating with all the effort that entails it not functional; and • Neighbourhood plans need to be linked more directly into the duration of the Wiltshire Local Plan. Wiltshire Council has also offered meetings with the town and parish councils at ‘sometime in the future’ but wishes to wait until the government has responded to the consultation on proposed long-term changes to the national planning system before considering its own next steps.
    [Show full text]
  • A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down
    A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down 8 e m TR010025 u l o V Deadline 4 8.30.6 - Written summaries of oral submissions put at Traffic and Transport hearing on 13th June 2019 APFP Regulation 5(2)(q) Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010 June 2019 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down Development Consent Order 20[**] Written summaries of oral submissions put at Traffic and Transport hearing on 13th June 2019 Regulation Number: Regulation 5(2)(q) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010025 Reference Application Document Reference 8.30.6 Author: A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down Project Team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version Rev 0 21 June 2019 Deadline 4 Issue A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................ 2 3 METHODOLOGY AND MODELLING............................................................... 3 4 PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY ............................................................................... 8 5 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC .......................................................................... 22 6 OPERATIONAL TRAFFIC .............................................................................. 23 7 ASSESSMENT OF OTHER SUGGESTED ROUTES .................................... 27 8 ECONOMIC AND BENEFIT COST RATIO ASSESSMENT ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Reading Naturalist
    The Reading Naturalist No. 44 Published by the Reading and District Natural History Society 1992 Price to Non-Members £2.50 THE READING NATURALIST No 44 for the year 1991 The Journal of the Reading and District Natural History Society President Mrs S.J. Whitfield Hon. General Secretary Mrs M. Beek. Hon. Editor Mrs F.E.M. Cook. Editorial Sub-Committee The Editor. Mr B.R . Baker. Mr H.H. Carter. Miss J . Housden, Mrs B.M. Newman, Dr A.R. Brickstock. Mr M. V. Fletcher Honorary Recorders Botany: Mrs B.M. Newman. Fungi: Dr A. R. Brickstock. Entomology: Mr B.R. Baker. Vertebrates: Mr H.H . Carter. CONTENTS Page Edi torial... ...... .............. .. ... ................................................................. 1 Obituaries............. .... .... .. .. ... ... .... ...... ....... ... .. .... ....... ... ....... .. .. .. ........... 2 Excursions 1990-1991 .... ....... ................................... ....... ............. .... .. 3 Meetings 1990-1991 ................... .. ... ........... .............. ................... ....... 5 Presidential Address Just Back from China S.J. Whitfield...... ........ .. ...... ......... 6 Heelstrike! M. V. Fletcher...................... .... ..... 8 Honorary Recorders ' Reports Botany Report B.M. Newman ............. ................ ... 14 Fungi Report A.R. Brickstock ............................ 21 En tomology Report B.R. Baker .... ... .............. ... ........... 26 Vertebrates Report H.H. Carter .................................. 36 Weather Report for 1991 R.D. Thompson ............... .. ... .. ....... 39 EDITORIAL This is the first year that I have edited the 'Reading Naturalist' and my first duty must be to thank Hilda Lambden for ~ll her years of dedicated work as editor of the magazine. I hope that I can live up to the high standards that she has set and thank her for the guidance she has kindly given towards the production of this issue. Many thanks are also due to the recorders who have painstakingly collated the records, and of course to the authors of the articles.
    [Show full text]