DOCSLIB.ORG

2005 Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2005 Program 1 ISOQOL 12th Annual Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Research Building Bridges to Enhance Quality of Life October 19 - 22, 2005 San Francisco, California USA Conference Committee Chair Ron Hays, PhD, USA Conference Committee Co-Chairs Anita Stewart, PhD, USA Leo S. Morales, MD, USA Final Program 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents Schedule at a Glance .......................................................................................................................... 3 Scientific Program Committee / ISOQOL Leadership ......................................................................................................................... 4 Welcome / About ISOQOL ................................................................................................................ 5 General Information ......................................................................................................................6 - 7 Program Schedule, Wednesday..................................................................................................8 - 12 Program Schedule, Thursday ...................................................................................................13 - 26 Program Schedule, Friday .........................................................................................................27 - 41 Program Schedule, Saturday ....................................................................................................42 - 53 Hotel Floor Plan ................................................................................................................................. 54 Exhibitors ............................................................................................................................................ 55 Acknowledgements / Contributing to ISOQOL ...................................................................56 - 57 Advertisements ...........................................................................................................................58 - 63 Notes..............................................................................................................................................64 - 67 2006 Meeting Dates / Location .........................................................................................Back Cover Schedule-at-a-Glance 3 Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, October 19 October 20 October 21 October 22 8:30am Registration Opens 7:30am Registration 7:30am Registration 7:30am Registration Grand Foyer Grand Foyer Grand Foyer Grand Foyer 9:30am- Workshops 8:00am- Posters on Display 8:00am- Posters on Display - 3 8:00am- Posters on Display - 5 12:30pm 1 Bayview Room A 12:00pm Bayview Room 12:00pm Bayview Room 11:45am Bayview Room 2 Grand Ballroom C 3 Seacliff Room C/D 8:45am- Presidential Welcome 9:00am- Plenary 2 8:00am- Plenary Session 3 4 Marina Room 9:00am Grand Ballroom A 10:15am Policy Applications 9:15am QOL Assessment in 5 Grand Ballroom B of QOL Clinical Practice 6 Bayview Room B 9:00am- Plenary 1 Grand Ballroom A Grand Ballroom A 7 Garden Room 10:15am Measuring Health 8 Seacliff Room A/B Grand Ballroom A 10:15am- Break/Meet the 9:15am- Break/Meet the 11:15am Author:Poster 10:15am Author: Poster 12:30pm- Lunch on your own 10:15am- Break/Meet the Author: Session 3 Session 5 1:30pm 11:15am Poster Session 1 Bayview Room Bayview Room Bayview Room 1:30pm- Workshops 11:15am- Parallel Session 3 10:15am- Parallel Session 6 4:30pm 9 Bayview Room A 11:15am- Parallel Session 1 12:45pm Symposium 3 11:45am Oral Session 6-A 10 Seacliff Room C/D 12:45pm Symposium 1 Intellectual Property IRT 11 Grand Ballroom C Measuring PROs in Grand Ballroom A Grand Ballroom A 12 Seacliff Room A/B Children Oral Session 3-A Oral Session 6-B 13 Grand Ballroom B Grand Ballroom A Cancer Mental Health 14 Marina Room Oral Session 1-A Seacliff Room A/B Seacliff Room A/B 15 Bayview Room B Serious Disease Oral Session 3-B Oral Session 6-C 16 Garden Room Seacliff Room A/B Spirituality/Pallative Analytic Methods Oral Session 1-B Seacliff Room C/D Seacliff Room C/D 6:00pm- Opening Reception HRQOL in Children Oral Session 3-C Oral Session 6-D 7:00pm Grand Ballroom A Seacliff Room C/D Caregivers Preferences Oral Session 1-C Garden Room Garden Room Data Collection Garden Room 12:45pm- Business 11:45am-Lunch on your own 2:15pm Meeting Lunch 1:00pm 12:30pm-Posters on Display - 2 and Networking 6:30pm Bayview Room Session 12:30pm- Posters on Display - 6 Grand Ballroom B/C 5:00pm Bayview Room 12:45pm-Lunch Session: Peer 2:00pm Review Process 2:15pm- Parallel Session 4 1:00pm- Joint ISOQOL/SMDM Atrium 3:45pm Symposium 4 3:30pm Oral Session IRT Grand Ballroom A/B/C 2:00pm- Parallel Session 2 Grand Ballroom A 3:30pm Symposium 2 Oral Session 4-A 3:30pm- Joint ISOQOL/SMDM Privately Funded Cancer 5:00pm Poster Session 6 Research Seacliff Room A/B Bayview Room Grand Ballroom A Oral Session 4-B Oral Session 2-A Children 7:00pm- Social Dinner/Awards Cancer: Measurement Seacliff Room C/D 10:00pm and Closing Ceremony Seacliff Room A/B Oral Session 4-C Atrium Restaurant Oral Session 2-B Neurology/Disability Analytic Issues Garden Room Seacliff Room C/D Oral Session 2-C 2:30pm- Posters on Display - 4 Diverse Populations 6:45pm Bayview Room Garden Room 3:45pm- Afternoon Break 3:30pm- Afternoon Break 4:15pm Grand Foyer 4:00pm Grand Foyer 4:15pm- Parallel Session 5 4:00pm- Invited Symposium: 5:45pm Symposium 5 5:30pm Hearing from Overcoming Limitations Stakeholders Grand Ballroom A Grand Ballroom A Oral Session 5-A Different Sources of 5:30pm- Meet the Author: Data PLEASE NOTE: 6:30pm Poster Session 2 Seacliff Room A/B WORKSHOPS Bayview Room Oral Session 5-B REQUIRE Urology/Neurolgy ADDITIONAL 6:30pm- Mentor/Mentee Seacliff Room C/D FEES AND 7:15pm Reception Oral Session 5-C REGISTRATION Atrium Preferences IS REQUIRED. Garden Room 5:45pm- Meet the Author: 6:45pm Poster Session 4 Bayview Room 4 Leadership ISOQOL 2005 Scientific Program Committee and Leadership Chair: Ron Hays, PhD, USA Co-Chairs: Anita Stewart, PhD, USA & Leo S. Morales, MD, USA Program Committee Members Rick Berzon, DrPH, USA Mona Martin, RN, MPA, USA Andrea Bezjak, MD, Canada Elaine McColl, PhD, UK Annabel Bowden, PhD, USA Carol M. Moinpour, PhD, USA Serge Briançon, MD, France David Osoba, MD, Canada Julie Brown, MSc, UK Geraldine Padilla, PhD, USA Peter Fayers, PhD, UK Bryce Reeve, PhD, USA David Feeny, PhD, Canada Carolyn Schwartz, ScD, USA Ashu Rajan Gandhi, MD, India Claire Snyder, PhD, USA Ted Ganiats, MD, USA Karen H. Sousa, RN, PhD, USA Mark Haggard, PhD, USA Henk van Stel, PhD, The Netherlands Sehyun Kim, PhD, Korea Albert Wu, MPH, MD, USA President Board of Directors David Feeny, PhD, Canada Andrea Bezjak, MD, MSc, Canada Andrew Bottomley, PhD, Belgium President-Elect Graeme Hawthorne, PhD, Australia Peter Fayers, PhD, UK Donna Lamping, PhD, UK Kwok-fai Leung, PDipOT, China Secretary-Treasurer Elaine McColl, MSc, UK Diane Fairclough, DrPH, USA Carolyn Schwartz, ScD, USA Laura Schwartzmann, MD, Uruguay Past President Ingela Wiklund, MSc, PhD, Sweden Albert Wu, MD, MPH, USA ISOQOL Management Team Executive Director Degnon Associates 6728 Old McLean Village Drive Laura E. Degnon, USA McLean, VA, 22101 USA 703.556.9222 Editor of Journal FAX: 703.556.8729 Neil Aaronson, PhD, The Netherlands Email: [email protected] Ron Hays, PhD, USA, incoming editor www.isoqol.org Welcome/About ISOQOL 5 Welcome Dear Colleagues, On behalf of the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL), it is our pleasure to welcome you to ISOQOL’s 12th Annual Conference in San Francisco, California, October 19 to 22, 2005. San Francisco has a diversity of residents, culture, and entertainment blended together in one of the most densely populated and beautiful cities in the U.S. The importance of quality of life to the community is evidenced by the decision in July to ban outdoor smoking in city-owned parks, plazas and public sports venues. With its famous Golden Gate and Bay bridges, the city is the ideal location for “Building Bridges to Enhance Quality of Life.” The conference theme and location re- flects ISOQOL’s openness to a variety of perspectives on the conceptualization, measurement, and applications of quality of life research. We welcome you to San Francisco for our 12th annual meeting. This is another important step in fostering collaboration among investigators and moving the field of quality of life research forward. Ron D. Hays, PhD, Anita Stewart, PhD, Leo Morales, MD Chair and Co-Chairs, 12th Annual Conference of ISOQOL About ISOQOL ISOQOL Mission The scientific study of Quality of Life relevant to health and healthcare is the mission of the Inter- national Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL). The Society promotes the rigorous investi- gation of health-related quality of life measurement from conceptualization to application and practice. ISOQOL fosters the worldwide exchange of information through: • Scientific Publications • International Conferences • Educational Outreach • Collaborative Support for HRQOL Initiatives ISOQOL Special Interest Groups Special Interest Groups have been established to facilitate communications between researchers with specific interests, ranging from methodology (e.g. clinical applications; cross-cultural re- search and translation methods), to applications of QoL in particular populations (e.g. HIV/AIDS). For more information and to join a Special Interest Group, visit our website at www.isoqol.org. ISOQOL Committees ISOQOL members are encouraged to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norges Fri-Idrettsforbund / Norwegian Athletics Federation Alle Tiders
    Norge / Norway: Alle tiders beste innendørs / All Time Best Indoor Norges Fri-idrettsforbund / Norwegian Athletics Federation Alle tiders beste innendørs / All Time Best Indoor Menn - 3000m / Men - 3000m pr. 20.04.2020 (oppdatert / updated 20.04.2020) 3000m menn 35-39 år / Men 35-39 years - 9:20.00/9:20.0 8:22.3 (3) Kåre Osnes, Haugesund IL (50) Stavanger 04.01.1987 8:24.02 (3) Knut Hegvold, Heimdal IF (61) Stange 08.02.1998 8:25.7 (7) Eirik Berge, IK Tjalve (48) Oslo/Ek 12.03.1983 8:26.1 (1) Øystein Kvaal Østerbø, Strindheim IL (81) Trondheim/Ra 13.02.2017 8:26.40 (1) Bjarte Sleire, IL Skjalg (54) Stavanger 19.01.1989 8:31.08 (8)MSA Kristian Nedregård, IL Tyrving (74) Korsholm, SWE 07.02.2012 8:31.6 (2) Bernt Eltervaag, IL Skjalg (62) Stavanger 22.02.1997 8:34.05 (2) Jan Felde, Moss IL (64) Stange 21.02.1999 8:35.92 (3) Jørn Holmen, IL Skjalg (58) Stange 20.02.1993 8:36.7 (2) Atle Tanum, Gjesdal IL (60) Stavanger 15.02.1998 (10) 8:39.08 (1) Helge Knudsen, IL Skjalg (52) Stavanger 19.02.1988 8:42.08 (1) Helge Dolsvåg, Kristiansands IF (62) Stange 21.03.1999 8:43.16 (1) Ole Kristian Heggheim, Kristiansands IF (72) Kristiansand 23.01.2010 8:47.23 (1) Terje Aggvin, IL Gular (74) Haukås 18.03.2012 8:52.9 (2) Henning Offigstad, Bratsberg IL (85) Trondheim/Ra 11.02.2020 8:55.9 (1) Ingar Engelund, Brønnøysund IL (54) Mo i Rana 18.02.1990 8:58.70 (2)MS Ronny Losoa, Modum FIK (80) Rud 10.02.2018 8:59.5 (2) Arne Hugo Hansen, Tromsdalen UIL (55) Mo i Rana 18.02.1990 9:00.06 (4)MSB Tore Olav Kristiansen, GTI (76) Haugesund 03.02.2013 9:01.57 (9)
    [Show full text]
  • Motor Problems in Children with ADHD and Clinical Effects of Methylphenidate As Assessed with the MFNU
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives Motor problems in Children with ADHD and clinical effects of Methylphenidate as assessed with the MFNU by Liv Larsen Stray Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR (PhD) Faculty of Arts and Education University of Stavanger N-4036 Stavanger NORWAY www.uis.no Copyright © 2009 Liv Larsen Stray ISBN 978-82-7644-393-6 ISSN 1890-1387 CONTENTS 1. Acknowledgements ______________________________________ 5 2. List of papers __________________________________________ 9 3. Summary _____________________________________________ 11 4. Introduction __________________________________________ 14 4.1. Background of the thesis _________________________________ 14 4.2. THE DIAGNOSIS OF ADHD/HKD ________________________ 15 4.3. ADHD – Neurobiologically based __________________________ 17 4.3.1. Neuropsychology of ADHD __________________________________ 17 4.3.2. Neuroanatomy of ADHD ____________________________________ 18 4.3.3. ADHD and treatment with stimulant medication __________________ 19 4.4. Motor functions ________________________________________ 19 4.4.1. Central neuro-motor system __________________________________ 19 4.5. Motor problems in children _______________________________ 21 4.5.1. Assessment of motor problems in children ______________________ 21 4.6. ADHD and motor problems_______________________________ 22 4.6.1. Motor problems in children with ADHD ________________________ 22 4.6.2. ADHD, motor problems and stimulant medication ________________ 23 4.7. The MFNU ____________________________________________ 23 4.7.1. Background for the development of the MFNU ___________________ 23 4.7.2. Inhibition problems revealed by the MFNU _____________________ 24 4.7.3 High muscular tone revealed by the MFNU ______________________ 25 4.7.4.
    [Show full text]
  • ARENA Report 7/19 Experts at Networking: the Constrained Influence of Experts in Norwegian Policy-Networks     
    Experts at Networking? The Constrained Influence of Experts in Norwegian Policy-Networks Marte Lund Saga ARENA Report 7/19 Experts at networking: The constrained influence of experts in Norwegian policy-networks Marte Lund Saga Copyright ARENA and the author ISBN (print) 978-82-8362-032-0 ISBN (online) 978-82-8362-033-7 ARENA Report Series (print) | ISSN 0807-3139 ARENA Report Series (online) | ISSN 1504-8152 Printed at ARENA Centre for European Studies University of Oslo P.O. Box 1143, Blindern N-0318 Oslo, Norway Tel: + 47 22 85 87 00 Fax: + 47 22 85 87 10 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.arena.uio.no Oslo, October 2019 Abstract The topic of this report is the system of public advisory commissions in Norway (NOU) and the social networks within that system. Analysing the NOU system as a social network allows for several unexplored questions to be asked with regard to the structure of the network as a whole. Approaching this in an explorative way, the first research question is: In what way has the network structure of the Norwegian advisory commissions changed over time? This is analysed within a Social Network Theory-framework, highlighting tendencies of centralisation and cohesion, as well as the aggregated centrality of the network over time. The second question I pose is driven by recent developments of the study of academic expertise in policymaking. I ask: To what extent have experts, compared to actors with other affiliations, gained greater influence over time in terms of structural position in the network? Recent studies have shown that within Norwegian advisory com- missions there is a growing number of academic experts, giving this particular societal group increased influence in the policy process.
    [Show full text]
  • Humiliation, Human Rights, and Global Corporate Responsibility
    Humiliation, Human Rights, and Global Corporate Responsibility © Evelin Gerda Lindner 2000 Manuscript submitted for publication, now in the process of revision We appreciate that you contact the author if you wish to quote from this text. Texts may usually be copied for non-profit educational use if proper credit is given to the author and Human Dignity and Humiliation Studies. No part of this file may be transmitted, distributed or reproduced in any other way without permission from the author Dr. psychol., Dr. med. Evelin Gerda Lindner University of Oslo, Institute of Psychology P.O.Box 1094 Blindern N-0317 Oslo, Norway [email protected] http://folk.uio.no/evelinl Humiliation, Human Rights, and Global Corporate Responsibility Abstract This article starts out from the suggestion that global social policy would benefit from more corporate awareness of the necessity of their responsible involvement. The typical response to such a proposition is that the corporate sector is not interested in charity, but in earning money. This paper suggests that the corporate sector has, in fact, an interest in incorporating more social responsibility into its strategic thinking, and that it will especially benefit from learning more about the process of humiliation, because the effects of feelings of humiliation hamper not only society at large but also corporate activities. The article demonstrates the significance of humiliation as central pillar of the old autocratic management style and shows how humiliation is undermining corporate efficiency as soon as creative networks are expected to function in today’s knowledge society. The paper analyses the role of humiliation in corporate relationships and highlights especially the humiliating affect of poverty on those who would like to participate in the market.
    [Show full text]
  • [Klikk Her Og Skriv Tittel]
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives The Applicability and Outcome of Constraint Induced Language Therapy (CILT) in Early Aphasia Rehabilitation Melanie Kirmess Dissertation for the Degree of PhD Department of Special Needs Education Faculty of Education University of Oslo 2010 © Melanie Kirmess, 2011 Series of dissertations submitted to the Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo No. 138 ISSN 1501-8962 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. Cover: Inger Sandved Anfinsen. Printed in Norway: AIT Oslo AS, 2011. Produced in co-operation with Unipub AS. The thesis is produced by Unipub AS merely in connection with the thesis defence. Kindly direct all inquiries regarding the thesis to the copyright holder or the unit which grants the doctorate. Unipub AS is owned by The University Foundation for Student Life (SiO) Contents CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................................... I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................. VII LIST OF PAPERS ............................................................................................................................. IX 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vejledning Til Fremtiden
    Karen A. Paaske Vejledning til fremtiden - Et studium af e-mailvejledning i Studievalgscentre Ph.d. - afhandling. Marts 2010 Forskningsenheden i Vejledning, Institut for Didaktik. Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitetsskole, Århus Universitet Vejledere: Ph.d. Peter Plant DPU, AU og Ph.d. Lars Birch Andreasen DPU, AU Vejledning til fremtiden 2 Forord ”MONOLOG Jeg kan ikke søke evig, Jeg må finne noe – et daggry! Jeg orker ikke lenger famle og snuble. Vil jeg, på min vandring i mørket Noengang støte mot noe, et eller andet som er? Jeg dør av å gå med gjenlukte øyne: Jeg ønsker åpne dem, sperre dem opp, Se et ansikt som straks bliver meg kjært. Det martrer å tie…min taushet er skrik, Men tale tør jeg ikke: Mine ord er trykkende stilhed. Et sted i tomheden venter latter og gråt, Et sted bak mørket venter ustrakte hender.” (Bronken, 1947) Denne afhandling er ikke udtryk for en monolog, den er alene muliggjort ved dialogen. Kun i et fællesskab har det kunnet lade sig gøre at undersøge vejledning med it i Studie- valgscentre. Projektet har ud fra en aktionsforskningstilgang taget form gennem et samar- bejde med studievalgsledere, studievalgsvejledere og gymnasieelever. Denne proces med- førte en afgrænsning således, at fokus i afhandlingen primært er e-mailvejledning af gym- nasieelever i regi at Studievalgscentre. Der er mange at takke for at projektet kunne realiseres. Først vil jeg takke Under- visningsministeriet, Danmarks Pædagogisk Universitetsskole Aarhus Universitet og VIA University College for at sikre de økonomiske rammer for projektet. Her en særlig tak til Peter Møller Pedersen og Søren Panny Pedersen, som støttede opstarten af projektet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Motor Function Neurological Assessment (MFNU) As an Indicator
    Behavioral and Brain Functions BioMed Central Research Open Access The Motor Function Neurological Assessment (MFNU) as an indicator of motor function problems in boys with ADHD Liv Larsen Stray*1,2, Torstein Stray1,2, Synnøve Iversen2, Anne Ruud1, Bjørn Ellertsen2 and Finn Egil Tønnessen2 Address: 1Department of Child and Adolescent Health, Sørlandet Hospital, Norway and 2The Reading Centre, Faculty of Education and Arts, University of Stavanger, Norway Email: Liv Larsen Stray* - [email protected]; Torstein Stray - [email protected]; Synnøve Iversen - [email protected]; Anne Ruud - [email protected]; Bjørn Ellertsen - [email protected]; Finn Egil Tønnessen - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 18 May 2009 Received: 20 August 2008 Accepted: 18 May 2009 Behavioral and Brain Functions 2009, 5:22 doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-22 This article is available from: http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/5/1/22 © 2009 Stray et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: The paper presents the Motor Function Neurological Assessment (MFNU), as a tool for identifying typical motor function problems in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The study investigated motor functions in boys diagnosed with Hyperkinetic Disorder (HKD, F.90.0). HKD corresponds to the ADHD-combined (ADHD-C) diagnosis in the DSM-IV. The paper addresses the ability of the instrument to discriminate between non-medicated boys with HKD and a control group consisting of normal non-referred boys without any clinical significant ADHD symptoms.
    [Show full text]