Cyphelium Notarisii in Sweden

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cyphelium Notarisii in Sweden Ann. Bot. Fennici 42: 317–326 ISSN 0003-3847 Helsinki 28 October 2005 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2005 Distribution, status and ecology of the lichen Cyphelium notarisii in Sweden Veronika Areskoug1 & Göran Thor2 1) Swedish Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 7007, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden (e-mail: veronikaA@ icraf-cm.org) 2) Department of Conservation Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7002, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden (e-mail: [email protected]) Received 5 May 2004, revised version received 21 Jan. 2005, accepted 29 Mar. 2005 Areskoug, V. & Thor, G. 2005: Distribution, status and ecology of the lichen Cyphelium notarisii in Sweden. — Ann. Bot. Fennici 42: 317–326. An inventory of the two largest Swedish occurrences of the lichen Cyphelium notarisii, situated on Visingsö in Småland and at Kovik on Gotland, respectively, was conducted. A third occurrence on Fårö, Gotland was discovered. A total of 21 localities were vis- ited. Only cultural substrates such as wooden barn walls, fishing sheds and gates were utilised by fertile specimens. The species is mostly found on south- to southwest-facing walls with no shade cover, close to a water-body. The current distribution is greatly reduced compared to the historical range of the species. The major current occurrences are characterised by a high concentration of old wooden structures, which strongly indicates that measures to ensure the viability of the species should be taken at the land- scape level, rather than on individual localities. Cyphelium notarisii is reported as new to Estonia and Kazakhstan, and C. tigillare is reported as new to Gotland, Sweden. Key words: Cyphelium notarisii, lichens, red-listed, substrates, wood Introduction Since 1969 C. notarisii has been accepted as a separate species due to its submuriform spores Cyphelium notarisii is red-listed as Critically (Tibell 1969). For a comprehensive summary of Endangered (CR) in Sweden (Gärdenfors 2005). the species’ taxonomy and distribution, see Nils- The species is a crustose lichen of the family son (1930) and Tibell (1969, 1971, 1975, 1984). Caliciaceae, and it was first described by Tulasne For a morphological description see Tibell (1999). (1852) under the name Acolium notarisii. Blom- In gross morphology C. notarisii is indistinguisha- berg and Forssell (1880) subsequently transferred ble from C. tigillare, but differs by the spore shape the species to the genus Cyphelium. Vainio (1927) (Tibell 1999). The thallus has numerous irregular placed Cyphelium notarisii in its own monotypic groups of conspicuous, irregular, black multilocu- genus based on the submuriform spore morphol- lar pycnidia. Very similar pycnidia are also present ogy, referring to the species as Pseudacolium in C. tigillare (Tibell 1999), but sterile thalli with notarisii. Weber (1967) claimed C. notarisii to abundant pycnidia are often referred to C. nota- be a variety of its relative Cyphelium tigillare. risii. For photographs see e.g. Tibell (1999). 318 Areskoug & Thor • ANN. BOT. FENNICI Vol. 42 This paper summarises the current and former (Hultengren & Danielsson 1996). A finding was distribution, status and ecology of the species in made in 1997 on the island of Biskops-Arnö, Sweden, and the prerequisites for its long-term Uppland, by Svante Hultengren (pers. comm.). survival in Sweden are discussed. The paper is Unfortunately, the substrate barn wall was painted based on a degree project at the Swedish Univer- over very shortly after the discovery, destroying sity of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala (Areskoug the occurrence. A second rather nearby locality in 2000). Uppland was recently found, but also there, the wall has now been painted over (Foucard 2004). These incidents demonstrate the current vulner- Former status and distribution in Sweden ability of the species. A few additional unpub- lished localities have also been found in northern The distribution range of Cyphelium notarisii for- Uppland and Dalarna by J. Hermansson during merly extended from Skåne (56°N) in the south the past few years (see Appendix). to Hälsingland (61°N) in the north (Appendix). Most collections were made prior to the end of the 1930s. Only three collections were made during Status and distribution outside Sweden the 1940s (Bohuslän, 1942, Magnusson; Gästrik- land, 1942, Ahlner; Västmanland, 1949, Kjell- The species is widely distributed in North Amer- mert), and two during the 1950s (Västmanland, ica, Asia and Europe, stretching from 116°W 1950, Kjellmert; Södermanland, 1958, Hasselrot). to 86°E and from 39°N to 61°N (Appendix). All old herbarium specimens utilised cultural sub- Collections of C. notarisii outside Sweden are strates. During the 1960s, 1970s and a large part sparse, with no more than a single collection of the 1980s no collections were made, and the from several countries. Few findings of C. nota- species was presumed to have disappeared from risii have been made in recent years, except in Sweden (Tibell 1992). It was, however, redis- England (Earland-Bennett & Hitch 1997, Dobson covered in 1986 on a barn wall in the province of 2003). The species was published as new to Hälsingland (Ågren 1991, as C. tigillare), but that Spain by Sarrión et al. (1999). An occurrence in locality was destroyed in 1997 by the removal southern Siberia was published by Nimis (1993). of the barn (Å. Ågren, pers. comm.). Two locali- We have, however, seen no Siberian material. ties were subsequently discovered in 1990 on the The available collections are insufficient for island Visingsö in the province of Småland (Thor an accurate analysis of the change in the spe- 1993). The species was also discovered in 1994 cies’ global status. Many historical collections at Kovik fishing village museum on Gotland by exist from Germany and the United States, but Mats Nordin (pers. comm.). the records are sporadic, and no adequate assess- The rediscovery of the species has led to ment of the present situation has been made. It reinventories on many of its former localities. is unlikely that the existing herbarium material Three old localities in Skåne and Blekinge were will ever allow us to obtain certain information revisited by Ulf Arup and Stefan Ekman in 1991 about the historical abundance of the species, or (Arup et al. 1997). They were unable to find the draw definite conclusions regarding its popula- species in its previous localities, but a new site tion development. was discovered on Hallands Väderö, Skåne (Arup et al. 1997; no apothecia). This is the only known occurrence of C. notarisii growing on a natu- Material and methods rally occurring substrate (Juniperus communis) in Sweden. One additional new locality has subse- Data on the Swedish distribution was collected quently been discovered in eastern Skåne (Arup from the Swedish Species Information Centre 1999). In the province of Västmanland, only one (ArtDatabanken), and by means of personal com- old locality could be identified. This site was munication. All specimens of C. notarisii from inventoried, but C. notarisii was neither found B, BM, CANL, COLO, FH, GB, M, NY, S, UPS, there, nor in other appropriate habitats in the area W and the personal herbarium of the author (G. ANN. BOT. FENNICI Vol. 42 • Distribution, status and ecology of Cyphelium notarisii in Sweden 319 Thor) were examined in order to determine the 6. On each individual wall, specimens of C. historical distribution of C. notarisii, in Sweden notarisii were checked for fertility. The high- and globally. The herbarium material is listed in est and lowest point of apothecium occur- the Appendix. The nomenclature follows Santes- rence was measured to the nearest cm, and son et al. (2004). Collections of C. notarisii and a collection for the purpose of microscopic C. tigillare by V. Areskoug and G. Thor (Appen- examination of the spores was usually made. dix) will be deposited in UPS. 7. The thickness of the wooden substrate uti- The two largest remaining occurrences of lised by C. notarisii was measured to the C. notarisii in Sweden (Visingsö, Småland and nearest 1 mm. Kovik fishing museum, Gotland) were revis- 8. The degree of substrate decay was recorded. ited, and a third (Fårö, Gotland) was discovered The following decomposition scale from 1–5 and inventoried. The fieldwork was carried out was developed to evaluate the condition of during September and October 1997. For the the substrate: (1) new wood free from surface purpose of this publication each property unit, cracks and obvious signs of decay, (2) wood often consisting of several structures (barns, fish- intact, firm, cracks < 1 mm wide, (3) wood ing sheds, fences), was defined as one locality. of a silver hue, firm, surface fleeced, cracks This was considered appropriate, as the build- 1–3 mm wide, (4) wood beginning to soften, ings of a specific property are likely to have a cracks 3–5 mm wide, (5) wood in latter similar maintenance regime and historical usage, stages of decay, cracks > 5 mm wide. and to be exposed to the same threats. The following parameters were measured or noted on each locality where C. notarisii was Results present: A total coverage of 731.5 dm2 was found at 1. Distance from water (approximated to within the three occurrences inventoried. Herbarium 100 m). material from Estonia and Kazakhstan, where 2. Distance from dust impregnation source, e.g., there are no previous records of the species (e.g. gravel road or arable field (approximated to Randlane & Saag 1999) was studied. The collec- within 10 m). tion from Estonia has no apothecia, yet the high 3. Percentage shade cover of the C. notarisii abundance of pycnidia suggests that it is a C. growth. notarisii specimen (see above). Occurrence on 4. Directional exposure (measured using a natural substrates appears to be more common handheld compass). outside Sweden. The species was collected on 5.
Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi for Genera with Members in Temperate Western North America Draft: 2012-03-13
    Draft: 2012-03-13 Checklist of Calicioids – E. B. Peterson Checklist of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi For Genera with Members in Temperate Western North America Draft: 2012-03-13 by E. B. Peterson Calicium abietinum, EBP#4640 1 Draft: 2012-03-13 Checklist of Calicioids – E. B. Peterson Genera Acroscyphus Lév. Brucea Rikkinen Calicium Pers. Chaenotheca Th. Fr. Chaenothecopsis Vainio Coniocybe Ach. = Chaenotheca "Cryptocalicium" – potentially undescribed genus; taxonomic placement is not known but there are resemblances both to Mycocaliciales and Onygenales Cybebe Tibell = Chaenotheca Cyphelium Ach. Microcalicium Vainio Mycocalicium Vainio Phaeocalicium A.F.W. Schmidt Sclerophora Chevall. Sphinctrina Fr. Stenocybe (Nyl.) Körber Texosporium Nádv. ex Tibell & Hofsten Thelomma A. Massal. Tholurna Norman Additional genera are primarily tropical, such as Pyrgillus, Tylophoron About the Species lists Names in bold are believed to be currently valid names. Old synonyms are indented and listed with the current name following (additional synonyms can be found in Esslinger (2011). Names in quotes are nicknames for undescribed species. Names given within tildes (~) are published, but may not be validly published. Underlined species are included in the checklist for North America north of Mexico (Esslinger 2011). Names are given with authorities and original citation date where possible, followed by a colon. Additional citations are given after the colon, followed by a series of abbreviations for states and regions where known. States and provinces use the standard two-letter abbreviation. Regions include: NAm = North America; WNA = western North America (west of the continental divide); Klam = Klamath Region (my home territory). For those not known from North America, continental distribution may be given: SAm = South America; EUR = Europe; ASIA = Asia; Afr = Africa; Aus = Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Taxonomy and Diversification Events in the Caliciaceae
    Fungal Diversity DOI 10.1007/s13225-016-0372-y Phylogeny, taxonomy and diversification events in the Caliciaceae Maria Prieto1,2 & Mats Wedin1 Received: 21 December 2015 /Accepted: 19 July 2016 # The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Although the high degree of non-monophyly and Calicium pinicola, Calicium trachyliodes, Pseudothelomma parallel evolution has long been acknowledged within the occidentale, Pseudothelomma ocellatum and Thelomma mazaediate Caliciaceae (Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota), a brunneum. A key for the mazaedium-producing Caliciaceae is natural re-classification of the group has not yet been accom- included. plished. Here we constructed a multigene phylogeny of the Caliciaceae-Physciaceae clade in order to resolve the detailed Keywords Allocalicium gen. nov. Calicium fossil . relationships within the group, to propose a revised classification, Divergence time estimates . Lichens . Multigene . and to perform a dating study. The few characters present in the Pseudothelomma gen. nov available fossil and the complex character evolution of the group affects the interpretation of morphological traits and thus influ- ences the assignment of the fossil to specific nodes in the phy- Introduction logeny, when divergence time analyses are carried out. Alternative fossil assignments resulted in very different time es- Caliciaceae is one of several ascomycete groups characterized timates and the comparison with the analysis based on a second- by producing prototunicate (thin-walled and evanescent) asci ary calibration demonstrates that the most likely placement of the and a mazaedium (an accumulation of loose, maturing spores fossil is close to a terminal node rather than a basal placement in covering the ascoma surface).
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogeny of Plant and Animal Pathogens in the Ascomycota
    Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology (2001) 59, 165±187 doi:10.1006/pmpp.2001.0355, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on MINI-REVIEW The phylogeny of plant and animal pathogens in the Ascomycota MARY L. BERBEE* Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada (Accepted for publication August 2001) What makes a fungus pathogenic? In this review, phylogenetic inference is used to speculate on the evolution of plant and animal pathogens in the fungal Phylum Ascomycota. A phylogeny is presented using 297 18S ribosomal DNA sequences from GenBank and it is shown that most known plant pathogens are concentrated in four classes in the Ascomycota. Animal pathogens are also concentrated, but in two ascomycete classes that contain few, if any, plant pathogens. Rather than appearing as a constant character of a class, the ability to cause disease in plants and animals was gained and lost repeatedly. The genes that code for some traits involved in pathogenicity or virulence have been cloned and characterized, and so the evolutionary relationships of a few of the genes for enzymes and toxins known to play roles in diseases were explored. In general, these genes are too narrowly distributed and too recent in origin to explain the broad patterns of origin of pathogens. Co-evolution could potentially be part of an explanation for phylogenetic patterns of pathogenesis. Robust phylogenies not only of the fungi, but also of host plants and animals are becoming available, allowing for critical analysis of the nature of co-evolutionary warfare. Host animals, particularly human hosts have had little obvious eect on fungal evolution and most cases of fungal disease in humans appear to represent an evolutionary dead end for the fungus.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens and Allied Fungi of the Indiana Forest Alliance
    2017. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 126(2):129–152 LICHENS AND ALLIED FUNGI OF THE INDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE ECOBLITZ AREA, BROWN AND MONROE COUNTIES, INDIANA INCORPORATED INTO A REVISED CHECKLIST FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA James C. Lendemer: Institute of Systematic Botany, The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458-5126 USA ABSTRACT. Based upon voucher collections, 108 lichen species are reported from the Indiana Forest Alliance Ecoblitz area, a 900 acre unit in Morgan-Monroe and Yellowwood State Forests, Brown and Monroe Counties, Indiana. The lichen biota of the study area was characterized as: i) dominated by species with green coccoid photobionts (80% of taxa); ii) comprised of 49% species that reproduce primarily with lichenized diaspores vs. 44% that reproduce primarily through sexual ascospores; iii) comprised of 65% crustose taxa, 29% foliose taxa, and 6% fruticose taxa; iv) one wherein many species are rare (e.g., 55% of species were collected fewer than three times) and fruticose lichens other than Cladonia were entirely absent; and v) one wherein cyanolichens were poorly represented, comprising only three species. Taxonomic diversity ranged from 21 to 56 species per site, with the lowest diversity sites concentrated in riparian corridors and the highest diversity sites on ridges. Low Gap Nature Preserve, located within the study area, was found to have comparable species richness to areas outside the nature preserve, although many species rare in the study area were found only outside preserve boundaries. Sets of rare species are delimited and discussed, as are observations as to the overall low abundance of lichens on corticolous substrates and the presence of many unhealthy foliose lichens on mature tree boles.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multigene Phylogenetic Synthesis for the Class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 Fungi Representing 1139 Infrageneric Taxa, 317 Genera and 66 Families
    A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families Miadlikowska, J., Kauff, F., Högnabba, F., Oliver, J. C., Molnár, K., Fraker, E., ... & Stenroos, S. (2014). A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 79, 132-168. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.003 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.003 Elsevier Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 132–168 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska a, , Frank Kauff b,1, Filip Högnabba c, Jeffrey C. Oliver d,2, Katalin Molnár a,3, Emily Fraker a,4, Ester Gaya a,5, Josef Hafellner e, Valérie Hofstetter a,6, Cécile Gueidan a,7, Mónica A.G. Otálora a,8, Brendan Hodkinson a,9, Martin Kukwa f, Robert Lücking g, Curtis Björk h, Harrie J.M. Sipman i, Ana Rosa Burgaz j, Arne Thell k, Alfredo Passo l, Leena Myllys c, Trevor Goward h, Samantha Fernández-Brime m, Geir Hestmark n, James Lendemer o, H. Thorsten Lumbsch g, Michaela Schmull p, Conrad L. Schoch q, Emmanuël Sérusiaux r, David R. Maddison s, A. Elizabeth Arnold t, François Lutzoni a,10,
    [Show full text]
  • Piedmont Lichen Inventory
    PIEDMONT LICHEN INVENTORY: BUILDING A LICHEN BIODIVERSITY BASELINE FOR THE PIEDMONT ECOREGION OF NORTH CAROLINA, USA By Gary B. Perlmutter B.S. Zoology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 1991 A Thesis Submitted to the Staff of The North Carolina Botanical Garden University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Advisor: Dr. Johnny Randall As Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Certificate in Native Plant Studies 15 May 2009 Perlmutter – Piedmont Lichen Inventory Page 2 This Final Project, whose results are reported herein with sections also published in the scientific literature, is dedicated to Daniel G. Perlmutter, who urged that I return to academia. And to Theresa, Nichole and Dakota, for putting up with my passion in lichenology, which brought them from southern California to the Traingle of North Carolina. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….4 Chapter I: The North Carolina Lichen Checklist…………………………………………………7 Chapter II: Herbarium Surveys and Initiation of a New Lichen Collection in the University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU)………………………………………………………..9 Chapter III: Preparatory Field Surveys I: Battle Park and Rock Cliff Farm……………………13 Chapter IV: Preparatory Field Surveys II: State Park Forays…………………………………..17 Chapter V: Lichen Biota of Mason Farm Biological Reserve………………………………….19 Chapter VI: Additional Piedmont Lichen Surveys: Uwharrie Mountains…………………...…22 Chapter VII: A Revised Lichen Inventory of North Carolina Piedmont …..…………………...23 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………..72 Appendices………………………………………………………………………………….…..73 Perlmutter – Piedmont Lichen Inventory Page 4 INTRODUCTION Lichens are composite organisms, consisting of a fungus (the mycobiont) and a photosynthesising alga and/or cyanobacterium (the photobiont), which together make a life form that is distinct from either partner in isolation (Brodo et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Opuscula Philolichenum, 11: 120-XXXX
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 13: 102-121. 2014. *pdf effectively published online 15September2014 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) Lichens and lichenicolous fungi of Grasslands National Park (Saskatchewan, Canada) 1 COLIN E. FREEBURY ABSTRACT. – A total of 194 lichens and 23 lichenicolous fungi are reported. New for North America: Rinodina venostana and Tremella christiansenii. New for Canada and Saskatchewan: Acarospora rosulata, Caloplaca decipiens, C. lignicola, C. pratensis, Candelariella aggregata, C. antennaria, Cercidospora lobothalliae, Endocarpon loscosii, Endococcus oreinae, Fulgensia subbracteata, Heteroplacidium zamenhofianum, Lichenoconium lichenicola, Placidium californicum, Polysporina pusilla, Rhizocarpon renneri, Rinodina juniperina, R. lobulata, R. luridata, R. parasitica, R. straussii, Stigmidium squamariae, Verrucaria bernaicensis, V. fusca, V. inficiens, V. othmarii, V. sphaerospora and Xanthoparmelia camtschadalis. New for Saskatchewan alone: Acarospora stapfiana, Arthonia glebosa, A. epiphyscia, A. molendoi, Blennothallia crispa, Caloplaca arenaria, C. chrysophthalma, C. citrina, C. grimmiae, C. microphyllina, Candelariella efflorescens, C. rosulans, Diplotomma venustum, Heteroplacidium compactum, Intralichen christiansenii, Lecanora valesiaca, Lecidea atrobrunnea, Lecidella wulfenii, Lichenodiplis lecanorae, Lichenostigma cosmopolites, Lobothallia praeradiosa, Micarea incrassata, M. misella, Physcia alnophila, P. dimidiata, Physciella chloantha, Polycoccum clauzadei, Polysporina subfuscescens, P. urceolata,
    [Show full text]
  • An All-Taxa Biodiversity Inventory of the Huron Mountain Club
    AN ALL-TAXA BIODIVERSITY INVENTORY OF THE HURON MOUNTAIN CLUB Version: August 2016 Cite as: Woods, K.D. (Compiler). 2016. An all-taxa biodiversity inventory of the Huron Mountain Club. Version August 2016. Occasional papers of the Huron Mountain Wildlife Foundation, No. 5. [http://www.hmwf.org/species_list.php] Introduction and general compilation by: Kerry D. Woods Natural Sciences Bennington College Bennington VT 05201 Kingdom Fungi compiled by: Dana L. Richter School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science Michigan Technological University Houghton, MI 49931 DEDICATION This project is dedicated to Dr. William R. Manierre, who is responsible, directly and indirectly, for documenting a large proportion of the taxa listed here. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 5 SOURCES 7 DOMAIN BACTERIA 11 KINGDOM MONERA 11 DOMAIN EUCARYA 13 KINGDOM EUGLENOZOA 13 KINGDOM RHODOPHYTA 13 KINGDOM DINOFLAGELLATA 14 KINGDOM XANTHOPHYTA 15 KINGDOM CHRYSOPHYTA 15 KINGDOM CHROMISTA 16 KINGDOM VIRIDAEPLANTAE 17 Phylum CHLOROPHYTA 18 Phylum BRYOPHYTA 20 Phylum MARCHANTIOPHYTA 27 Phylum ANTHOCEROTOPHYTA 29 Phylum LYCOPODIOPHYTA 30 Phylum EQUISETOPHYTA 31 Phylum POLYPODIOPHYTA 31 Phylum PINOPHYTA 32 Phylum MAGNOLIOPHYTA 32 Class Magnoliopsida 32 Class Liliopsida 44 KINGDOM FUNGI 50 Phylum DEUTEROMYCOTA 50 Phylum CHYTRIDIOMYCOTA 51 Phylum ZYGOMYCOTA 52 Phylum ASCOMYCOTA 52 Phylum BASIDIOMYCOTA 53 LICHENS 68 KINGDOM ANIMALIA 75 Phylum ANNELIDA 76 Phylum MOLLUSCA 77 Phylum ARTHROPODA 79 Class Insecta 80 Order Ephemeroptera 81 Order Odonata 83 Order Orthoptera 85 Order Coleoptera 88 Order Hymenoptera 96 Class Arachnida 110 Phylum CHORDATA 111 Class Actinopterygii 112 Class Amphibia 114 Class Reptilia 115 Class Aves 115 Class Mammalia 121 INTRODUCTION No complete species inventory exists for any area.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Taxonomy and Diversification Events in the Caliciaceae
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper published in Fungal diversity. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Prieto, M., Wedin, M. (2016) Phylogeny, taxonomy and diversification events in the Caliciaceae.. Fungal diversity https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-016-0372-y Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-2031 Fungal Diversity (2017) 82:221–238 DOI 10.1007/s13225-016-0372-y Phylogeny, taxonomy and diversification events in the Caliciaceae Maria Prieto1,2 & Mats Wedin1 Received: 21 December 2015 /Accepted: 19 July 2016 /Published online: 1 August 2016 # The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Although the high degree of non-monophyly and Calicium pinicola, Calicium trachyliodes, Pseudothelomma parallel evolution has long been acknowledged within the occidentale, Pseudothelomma ocellatum and Thelomma mazaediate Caliciaceae (Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota), a brunneum. A key for the mazaedium-producing Caliciaceae is natural re-classification of the group has not yet been accom- included. plished. Here we constructed a multigene phylogeny of the Caliciaceae-Physciaceae clade in order to resolve the detailed Keywords Allocalicium gen. nov. Calicium fossil . relationships within the group, to propose a revised classification, Divergence time estimates . Lichens . Multigene . and to perform a dating study. The few characters present in the Pseudothelomma gen. nov available fossil and the complex character evolution of the group affects the interpretation of morphological traits and thus influ- ences the assignment of the fossil to specific nodes in the phy- Introduction logeny, when divergence time analyses are carried out.
    [Show full text]
  • Une Association Lichénique Singulière Sur Des Piquets De Robinia Pseudoacacia L. En Milieu Rural : Le Strangosporo Moriformis-Calicietum Notarisii Ass
    Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et Vie), Vol. 73 (1), 2018 : 31-40 UNE ASSOCIATION LICHÉNIQUE SINGULIÈRE SUR DES PIQUETS DE ROBINIA PSEUDOACACIA L. EN MILIEU RURAL : LE STRANGOSPORO MORIFORMIS-CALICIETUM NOTARISII ASS. NOV. PROV. Clother COSTE1 & Patrick PINAULT2 1 26 rue de Venise. F- 81100 Castres. E-mail: [email protected] 2 8 impasse des basses cours. F- 63119 Chateaugay. E-mail: [email protected] SUMMARY.— A peculiar lichenic association on False acacia (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) posts in farmlands: Strangosporo moriformis-Calicietum notarisii ass. nov. prov.— Description of a provisional new lichenic association named Strangosporo moriformis-Calicietum notarisii in which Strangospora moriformis (Ach.) Stein. and Calicium notarisii (Tul.) M. Prieto and Wedin are the characteristics. This association brings together on wooden vine or fence posts made with False acacia the pioneer, lignicolous, acidophilous, astegophilous and pollutolerant lichens of the lowland in the biogeographical region of the nemoral domain of France. The lichenic association is described on the basis of surveys carried out in Limagne in the Massif central, but its French distribution should be more extensive compared of the geographical distribution of the species that compose it. RÉSUMÉ.— Description d’une association lichénique nouvelle provisoire nommée le Strangosporo moriformis-Calicietum notarisii dont Strangospora moriformis (Ach.) Stein. et Calicium notarisii (Tul.) M. Prieto et Wedin sont les caractéristiques. Cette association regroupe sur piquets de vignes ou de clôture en Robinier faux- acacia (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) les lichens pionniers, lignicoles, acidophiles, astégophiles et pollutolérants de l’étage collinéen dans la région biogéographique du domaine némoral de France. L’association lichénique est décrite sur la base de relevés effectués en Limagne dans le Massif central mais sa distribution française devrait être plus étendue au regard de la répartition géographique des espèces qui la composent.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Common Lichens of Boone and Story Counties, Lowa
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 71 Annual Issue Article 21 1964 A Guide to the Common Lichens of Boone and Story Counties, lowa Lois H. Tiffany Iowa State University Karen K. Juhl Iowa State University Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1964 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Tiffany, Lois H. and Juhl, Karen K. (1964) "A Guide to the Common Lichens of Boone and Story Counties, lowa," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 71(1), 118-135. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol71/iss1/21 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tiffany and Juhl: A Guide to the Common Lichens of Boone and Story Counties, lowa 118 IOWA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE [Vol. 71 was used because it has a larger opening and permits a more rapid transfer of the sample. In this way it is possible to distrib­ ute a sample equally among several slides. If the count at a particular level is exceptionally high, not all of the slides need be counted since each slide is one tenth of the total sample. This dilution method was compared to a count obtained by examination of the whole sample and the examination of in­ dividual slides was found to compare very favorably.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Taxonomy and Diversification Events in the Caliciaceae
    Fungal Diversity (2017) 82:221–238 DOI 10.1007/s13225-016-0372-y Phylogeny, taxonomy and diversification events in the Caliciaceae Maria Prieto1,2 & Mats Wedin1 Received: 21 December 2015 /Accepted: 19 July 2016 /Published online: 1 August 2016 # The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Although the high degree of non-monophyly and Calicium pinicola, Calicium trachyliodes, Pseudothelomma parallel evolution has long been acknowledged within the occidentale, Pseudothelomma ocellatum and Thelomma mazaediate Caliciaceae (Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota), a brunneum. A key for the mazaedium-producing Caliciaceae is natural re-classification of the group has not yet been accom- included. plished. Here we constructed a multigene phylogeny of the Caliciaceae-Physciaceae clade in order to resolve the detailed Keywords Allocalicium gen. nov. Calicium fossil . relationships within the group, to propose a revised classification, Divergence time estimates . Lichens . Multigene . and to perform a dating study. The few characters present in the Pseudothelomma gen. nov available fossil and the complex character evolution of the group affects the interpretation of morphological traits and thus influ- ences the assignment of the fossil to specific nodes in the phy- Introduction logeny, when divergence time analyses are carried out. Alternative fossil assignments resulted in very different time es- Caliciaceae is one of several ascomycete groups characterized timates and the comparison with the analysis based on a second- by producing prototunicate (thin-walled and evanescent) asci ary calibration demonstrates that the most likely placement of the and a mazaedium (an accumulation of loose, maturing spores fossil is close to a terminal node rather than a basal placement in covering the ascoma surface).
    [Show full text]