DOCSLIB.ORG

LOK SABHA DEBATES (English Version)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

i rurteenth Series, Vol. 11, No.2 Tuesday, July 6, 2004 Asadha 15, 1926 (Saka) LOK SABHA DEBATES (English Version) Second Session (Fourteenth Lok Sabha) Gazett"' & Dcb~1"s l'nlt Parliam\;nt Lr)! "r,. :- ,;:J!ng ROOr.l L,_,. [:-':':"5 (Vol. 1/ contains Nos. 1 to 10) Ace. No ... ~ .• .fit ................. .:t,," ,... 2-c..1)..,("" Dated ....... ~ ...................... LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI Price : Rs. 50.00 EDITORIAL BOARD G.C. Malhotra Secretary-General Lok Sabha Anand B. Kulkami Joint Secretary Sharda Prasad Principal Chief Editor Kiran Sahni Chief Editor Parmesh Kumar Sharma Senior Editor Sarita Nagpal Editor [ORIGINAL ENGLISH PROCEEDINGS INCLUDED IN ENGLISH VERSION AND ORIGINAl HINDI PROCEEDINGS INCLUDED IN HINDI VERSION Will BE TREATED AS AUTHORITATIVE AND NOT THE TRANSLATION THEREOF.) CONTENTS {F0UItHnth S6rif1s, Veal II, S«:ond ~ 200V1fl26 (&a)J No. 2. T~. Juty I, 2OO4IAudM tl, 1128 (au.) SUBJECT ORAL ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ·Starred Question Nos. 21, 22, 25, 30, 34, 35 and 39 .................................................................... WRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS Starred Question Nos. 23, 24, 27 to 29, 31 to 33, 36 to 38 and 40 ......................................... .. Unstarred Question Nos. 17~29 ......................................................................................................... PAPERS LAID ON THE TABLE .................................................................................................................... RAILWAY BUDGET, 2004-05 Shri Lalu Prasad ....................................................................................................................................... 436-472 STATEMENT BY MINISTER Reconstitution of Central Advisory Board of Education ....................................................................... 472-478 Shri Arjun Singh .................................................................................................................. 472-473 MATTERS UNDER RULE 377 ....................................................................................................................... 478-483 (i) Need to set up a gaa-cracker unit at Lepetkata In Aseam .. Incorporated In the Auam Accord of 1985 Shri Anwar Hussain ............................................................................................................ 478 (ii) Need to construct a rail over-bridge on Level Crosstng No. 81/A at Himrnatnagar on Himmatnagar-Ahmedabad Metre-gauge railway line in Gujarat Shri Madhusudan Mistry ..................................................................................................... 476-479 (iii) Need to bring in a legislation to accord 'Right to Strike' to the emp/oyeea Shri Sunil Khan ................................................................................................................... 479 (iv) Need to provide more facilities to the farming sector with a view to make It remunerative Shrl Ramjl Lal Suman ........................................................................................................ 479-480 "The sign + marked above the name of a member Indicates that the Queltion w.. actually uked on the floor of the House by that Member. SUBJECT COLUMNS (v) Need to set up Power Grid Stations in Sahebganj and Pakud Districts of Jharkhand Shri Hemlal Murmu ...........................................................................................................,. 480 (vi) Need to bring Legislation for providing job reservations for dept1vtd cIa&ses In Private Sector Dr. M. Jagannath ................................................................................................................ 481 (vii) Need for Four-Laning of NH-52 with connectivity through Four-Lane Rall-cum-Road Bridge over Brahmaputra between Chandrapur and North Guwahatl in Assam Dr. Arun Kumar Sarma ...................................................................................................... 481-482 (viii) Need to Expedite Broad-Gauge Conversion Work of Lumdlng-Badarpur Rail Section in Assam Shri Lalit Mohan Suklabaidya ............................................................................................ 482 (ix) Need to bring forward a new agriculture policy with thrust on agricultural growth Shri S.P.Y. Reddy ............................................................................................................... 482-483 (x) Need to chalk out a plan to undertake de-fluorification of drinking water In Nalgonda and other districts of Andhra Pradesh Shri Suravaram Sudhakar Reddy ..................................................................................... 483 DISCUSSION UNDER RULE 193 Situation in Iraq ........................................................................................................................................ 483-534 Shri P.K. Vasudevan Nair .................................................................................................. 484-489 Shri Mani Shankar Alyar .................................................................................................... 489-495 Shri Varkala Radhakrishnan ............................................................................................... 495-502 Prof. Ram Gopal Yadav ..................................................................................................... 502-507 Shri Madhusudan Mistry ..................................................................................................... 507-509 Shri Alok Kumar Mehta ...................................................................................................... 509-510 Shri lIyas Azml .................................................................................................................... 511-514 Shri Omar Abdullah ............................................................................................................ 514-519 Shri M.P. Veerendra Kumar .............................................................................................. "519-521 Shri Rupchand Pal ............................................................................................................ 521-523 Shri Asaduddin Owaisi ........................................................................................................ 523-525 525-534 (iii) SUBJECT CoLUMNS ANNEXURE-I Member-wise Index to Starred Lilt of Questions ............ :.................................................................. .. 535-636 Member-wile Index to Unstarred List of Questions ............................................................................. 535-538 ANNEXURE-II Ministry-wise Index to Starred List of Questions ................................................................................. 539-540 Ministry-wise Ind,x to Unstarred List of Questions ............................................................................. 539-540 OFFICERS OF LOK SABHA THE SPEAKER Shri Somnath Chatterjee THE DEPUTY ·SPEAKER Shri ChamJIt Singh Atwal PANEL OF CHAIRMEN· Shri Balasaheb Vikhe Patil Shri Girldhar Gamang Lt. Col. (ReId.) Manabendra Shah SECRETARY ·GENERAL Shri G.C. Malhotra "Nominated on 29.5.2004 by President. The following order was issued by the President of Irdla on 29.5.2004: "I hereby appoint S/Shri Somnath Chatterjee, Balasaheb Vlkhe Patil, Giridhar Garnang and Manabendra Shah to be the persons before any of whom members of the House of People may make and subscribe the oath or affirmation in accordance with the provisions of article 99 of the Constitution of India. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, PRESIDENT OF INDIA" LOK SABHA DEBATES LOK SABHA possible I would permit it. Now, plea8e allow the Question Hour to continue. Let the Parliament function. I appeal to you. Please listen to me. Do not interrupt TIJ9$d8y, July 6; 20041Asad1s 15, 1926 (Ssk8) the Question Hour. The House should function properly. This Is my earnest request to you . ... (Interruptions) Th8 Lok SlIbha mBf 8t Eltlvsn 01 thB Clock. MR. SPEAKER: Question No. 21-5hri Mitrasen [MR. SPEAKER in the eMir] Yadav. {English} ... (Interruptions) MR. SPEAKER: Question Hour, please. MR. SPEAKER: Now, Question No. 22-5hri Abdul ... (Int8rrupHons) Rashid Shaheen . {Translation} {Translation} SHRI RAGHUNATH JHA (Bettiah): Mr. Speaker, Sir, SHRI RAGHUNATH JHA: Shall I be allowed to today a news item has been published in the famous speak on it after the question hour? daily "Hindustan times· ... (InterrupHons) I want to know as to what had been the connection of the former MR. SPEAKER: Allright, you may raise the issue. Minister of Defence with Shri Telgl and at the time of Then I would see as to what can be done in this regard? Kargil war . ... (Interruphons) I want that the matter be investigated by the Minister of Home Affairs and for this ... (Intsrrup/ions) purpose, on behalf of my party ... (lnt8rruptions) [English} [English} MR. SPEAKER: Shri Shaheen, please put your MR. SPEAKER: Please. You may raise It after the question. Question Hour. {TmnsI8Hon} ... (Interruptions) SHRI MITRASEN YADAV (Faizabad): Mr. Speaker, MR. SPEAKER: Please cooperate with the Chair. Sir, I have been twice on my legs regarding the Q. No. ... (Interruptions) 21. .,. (InlsnupHons) MR. SPEAKER: Shri Raghunath Jha, please {English} cooperate with the Chair. MR. SPEAKER: Shri Mitrasen Yadav, you have ... (Interruptions) missed your tum. MR. SPEAKER: Question No. 21-Shri Mitrasen ·.. (Interruptions) Yadav. MR. SPEAKER: Shri Shaheen, please speak the ... (Interruptions) Question No. MR. SPEAKER: Question No. 21-Shri Mitrasen Yadav.
Recommended publications
  • Compounding Injustice: India

    Compounding Injustice: India

    INDIA 350 Fifth Ave 34 th Floor New York, N.Y. 10118-3299 http://www.hrw.org (212) 290-4700 Vol. 15, No. 3 (C) – July 2003 Afsara, a Muslim woman in her forties, clutches a photo of family members killed in the February-March 2002 communal violence in Gujarat. Five of her close family members were murdered, including her daughter. Afsara’s two remaining children survived but suffered serious burn injuries. Afsara filed a complaint with the police but believes that the police released those that she identified, along with many others. Like thousands of others in Gujarat she has little faith in getting justice and has few resources with which to rebuild her life. ©2003 Smita Narula/Human Rights Watch COMPOUNDING INJUSTICE: THE GOVERNMENT’S FAILURE TO REDRESS MASSACRES IN GUJARAT 1630 Connecticut Ave, N.W., Suite 500 2nd Floor, 2-12 Pentonville Road 15 Rue Van Campenhout Washington, DC 20009 London N1 9HF, UK 1000 Brussels, Belgium TEL (202) 612-4321 TEL: (44 20) 7713 1995 TEL (32 2) 732-2009 FAX (202) 612-4333 FAX: (44 20) 7713 1800 FAX (32 2) 732-0471 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] July 2003 Vol. 15, No. 3 (C) COMPOUNDING INJUSTICE: The Government's Failure to Redress Massacres in Gujarat Table of Contents I. Summary............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Impunity for Attacks Against Muslims...............................................................................................................
  • Ayodhya Verdict - UPSC Notes Context

    Ayodhya Verdict - UPSC Notes Context

    Ayodhya Verdict - UPSC Notes Context The Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgment in the Ayodhya land dispute case. The five-judge Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi read out a unanimous judgment and ruled in favour of the Ram Janmabhoomi and said there will be a Ram Mandir at the disputed site and Muslims will be given an alternate 5 acre land for their mosque. What is the crux of the dispute? At the crux of the matter is the belief among sections of Hindus that the Babri Masjid, named after Mughal emperor Babur, was built in Ayodhya after destroying a Ram Temple that marked the birthplace of the deity. The Hindu parties wanted the land to themselves, contending that Lord Ram was born at a spot on which later the central dome of the mosque was built. The Muslim parties, however, contended that the mosque was constructed in 1528 by Mir Baqi, a commander of Babur’s army, without demolishing any place of worship and since the land rights had not been transferred to any other party, the space was rightfully theirs. Chronology of the Ayodhya dispute 1528: First Mughal Emperor Babar is believed to have constructed Babri Masjid. The three-domed mosque built by Mir Baqi, commander of Mughal emperor Babur, in 1528 is in the Jaunpuri style. 1885: Mahant Raghbir Das moves Faizabad court seeking permission to construct a temple in the vicinity of the Babri Masjid. The plea is declined. 1949: Idols of Lord Ram were mysteriously found inside the mosque. The Muslim side claimed it was the handiwork of the Hindus, while the Hindus wanted to worship the idol.
  • Stratigraphy of the Late Proterozoic Sullavai Group, Pranhita-Godavari Valley, Andhra Pradesh

    Stratigraphy of the Late Proterozoic Sullavai Group, Pranhita-Godavari Valley, Andhra Pradesh

    Indian Journal of Geology Vol. 66, No. 2, p. 124-147, 1994 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LATE PROTEROZOIC SULLAVAI GROUP, PRANHITA-GODAVARI VALLEY, ANDHRA PRADESH T a p AN C h a k r ABORT Y Geological Studies Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 203 B. T. Road, Calcutta-700 035 ABSTRACT Mapping of about 800 sq kms in the southwestern outcrop belt and study of selected sections has led to the subdivision of the Late Proterozoic Sullavai Group of the Pranhita-Godavari Valley into three formal lithostratigraphic units, each of the status of a formation : (a) Ramgiri Formation, a coarse-grained, purple to red arkosic sandstones and conglomerates, (b) Mancheral Quartzite, a red coarse-grained quartzare- nite and (c) Venkatpur Sandstone, a fine-grained, salmon red quartzose to subarkosic sandstone. Venampalli Sandstone Member and Kapra Sandstone M em ber are defined as two formal members within Ramgiri Formation Paleocurrent pattern indicates that the alluvial fan-braided river deposits of the Ramgiri Formation and Mancheral Quartzite were derived from the opposite flanks of the basin sampling different source terrain. Ramgiri Formation was derived from Archean (?) granite gneiss complex cropping out to the south. Chert layers of under­ lying Pakhal and Penganga Group, and a quartzose sedimentary rock (Pranhita Sand­ stone of Penganga Group ?) fed the Mancheral river system. Mancheral and Ramgiri alluvium appear to have been the major source for the aeolian Venkatpur Sandstone that shows persistent northeasterly flow direction. In contrast to traditional “layer-cake” concept, regional lithocorrelation reveal a complex mosaic of different stratigraphic units. Consequently, it is difficult to propose a ••generalised” stratigraphic succession for the Sullavai Group.
  • LOK SABHA DEBATES (English Version)

    LOK SABHA DEBATES (English Version)

    .BSDI Twelfth Series, Vol. I, No. I LOK SABHA DEBATES (English Version) First Session (Twelfth Lok Sabha) I Gazettes & Debetes Unit ...... Parliament Library BulldlnO @Q~m ~o. FBr.026 .. ~-- -- (Vol. I contains Nos. I to 8) LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI I'ri ce .· Rs. 50. ()() 'VU"".&J:Ia.a.a IL.V .................. ~_ (Engl illl1 v«sian) 'lUeaJay, IIKcb 24, 1998/Chaitra 3, 1920 (Salta) Col.l1ine F« Raad CaltE!1ts/2 (fran &lltcn Salahuddin OWaisi Shri S. S. OWaiai below) 42/28 9/6 (fran below); SHRI ARIF HOfP.MW.D KHAN liIRI ARIF ~D KHAN 10/6 (fran below) j 11. /7,19: 13/3 12/5 (fran below) Delete "an" 13,19 (fran below) CalSSlsnal CalSE!1sual 22/25 hills hails CONTENTS {Twelfth Series. Vol. I. First Session. 199811920 (Seke)J No.2, Tuesday, March 24,1l1li Chain 3,1120 (lab) SUBJECT CoLUMNS MEMBERS SWORN 1-8 f)1:" SPEAKER 8-8 FI::L "'I-fE SPEAKER Shri Atal Biharl Vajpayee •.. 8-14 Shri Sharad Pawar ..• 14-15 Shrl Somnath Chatterjee .. 1~18 Shri Pumo A. Sangma .. 18-17 Kumari Mamata Banerjee .17-18 Shri Ram Vilas Paswan .•. 18 Shri R. Muthiah 19 Shri Mulayam Singh Yadav 19-20 Shri Lalu Prasad ... 21-22 Shri K. Yerrannaidu 22-23 Shri Naveen Patnaik 23 Shri Digvijay Singh .. 23-24 Shri Indrajit Gupta .. 24-25 Sardar Surjit Singh Bamala 2~2e Shri Murasoli Maran 28-28 Shri Shivraj ~. Palll .. ,. 28-29 Shri Madhukar Sirpotdar ... -_ ... 29-31 Shri Sanat Kumar Mandai 31 Shri P.C. Thomas 31-32 Kumari.
  • TIF - the Ayodhya Verdict Dissected

    TIF - the Ayodhya Verdict Dissected

    TIF - The Ayodhya Verdict Dissected SAIF AHMAD KHAN February 7, 2020 A view of the Babri Masjid overlooking the banks of the Sarayu as viewed in a late 18th century painting by William Hodges | Wikimedia A close analysis of the Supreme Court's final judgement on the Ayodhya dispute that has been criticised as much as it has been praised for how it has brought about closure The Supreme Court on 12 December 2019 dismissed the 18 review petitions which had been filed in response to its Ayodhya verdict. Although the Ayodhya title dispute lasted for over a century, the apex court acted in the swiftest possible manner while disposing of the review pleas. It did not “find any ground whatsoever” to entertain the review petitions after having “carefully gone through” the attached papers that had been submitted. Despite the Court’s benevolent view of its judgement, the truth is that the verdict pronounced by the five-judge bench on November 9 was full of contradictions. To put it plainly: the Supreme Court chose to bow down before the forces of majoritarian thuggery and extremism. Logic and law were conveniently set aside by the top court to appease a certain radical section of the society. Attempt to pacify the Muslim litigants To do complete justice in the Ayodhya dispute, the Supreme Court invoked Article 142 of the Indian Constitution. Technically speaking, Article 142 can be employed in cases of second appeal. The Ayodhya title dispute wasn’t heard at the level of a district court. It came directly for hearing before the Allahabad High Court.
  • Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Parivahan Bhavan, Tehri Kothi 6 M.G Marg, Lucknow 226001 Website

    Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Parivahan Bhavan, Tehri Kothi 6 M.G Marg, Lucknow 226001 Website

    2021 SELECTION OF A SYSTEM INTEGRATOR FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF “IoT BASED INTEGRATED BUS TICKETING SYSTEM” MOBILE ONLINE APPS FOR RESERVATION PASSENGERS SYSTEM EMV OVER THE COMPLIANT COUNTER FAST INSTANT CHARGING SMART E-TICKETING CARDS FOR MACHINES PASSENGERS Downloaded from www.upsrtc.com COMMAND qSPARC/RuPay CONTROL NCMC CARDS CENTRE(CCC) RFP DOCUMENT Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Parivahan Bhavan, Tehri Kothi 6 M.G Marg, Lucknow 226001 website: www.upsrtc.com Downloaded from www.upsrtc.com Page | 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) For Selection of a System Integrator for Implementation of “IoT Based Integrated Bus Ticketing System at UPSRTC” Key events 1 Date of issuance 26.02.2021 2 Last date for receiving pre-bid queries 13.03.2021 up to 12:00 hrs 3 Pre-bid conference details 15.03.2021 From 11:00 AM at UPSRTC HQ , Parivahan Bhawan, 6 MG Marg Lucknow 226001 4 Date for response to pre-bid queries To be notified on https://etender.up.nic.in & www.upsrtc.com 5 Last date for preparation of bids To be notified later through above websites 6 Last date of submissionDownloaded of bids As above from 7 Opening of Pre-qualification bids and As above technical bids www.upsrtc.com 8 Opening of commercial bids Will be communicated later Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) Parivahan Bhavan, Tehri Kothi, 6 M.G. Marg, Lucnow-226001 Tender/UPSRTC/IT/ETIM/IoT/2021 Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) Table of Contents Contents Table of Contents .........................................................................................................................................
  • Ethnic Parties, Material Politics and the Ethnic Poor: the Bahujan Samaj Party in North India

    Ethnic Parties, Material Politics and the Ethnic Poor: the Bahujan Samaj Party in North India

    Ethnic Parties, Material Politics and the Ethnic Poor: The Bahujan Samaj Party in North India Sohini Guha, Department of Political Science McGill University, Montreal December 2008 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) © Copyright Sohini Guha, 2008 Abstract Many studies explore the determinants of support for ethnic parties, and the consequences of such parties for democracy. This dissertation addresses these questions through a study of the Bahujan Samaj Party (B.S.P.) in India's largest state, Uttar Pradesh (U.P.). The BSP is India's only successful lower caste party, and gained greatest support over the last two decades in U.P., which it now rules. The dissertation argues that material benefits, delivered on a programmatic basis, account for the success of the B.S.P., and perhaps other ethnic parties too, among poorer groups. It also indicates that the B.S.P.'s consequences for democracy -on the whole positive- have depended both on its ties to society, and the breadth of visions of community reigning among its core supporters. The conclusions are based on analyses of electoral results, the caste background of party candidates, patterns of ownership of land and other resources, extensive interviews with party leaders and activists, and ethnographic studies of representative villages in U.P. The argument about the reasons for support questions an assumption common to psychological theories of ethnic voting- that poorer groups vote for ethnic parties because they draw symbolic empowerment from the material ascendancy that ethnic parties secure for coethnic elites.
  • GRMB Annual Report 2018-19 | 59

    GRMB Annual Report 2018-19 | 59

    Government of India Ministry of Jal Shakti Department of Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation Godavari River Management Board GODAVARI RIVER Origin Brahmagiri near Trimbakeshwar, Nashik Dist., Maharashtra Geographical Area 9.50 % of Total Geographical Area of India Location Latitude – 16°19’ to 22°34’ North Longitude – 73°24’ to 83° 40’ East Boundaries West: Western Ghats North: Satmala hills, Ajanta range and the Mahadeo hills East: Eastern Ghats & Bay of Bengal South: Balaghat & Mahadeo ranges, stretching from eastern flank of Western Ghats & Anantgiri and other ranges of the hills. Ridges separate the Godavari basin from Krishna basin. Catchment Area 3,12,812 Sq.km. Length of the River 1465 km States Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Odisha, Karnataka, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh and Puducherry (Yanam). Length in AP & TS 772 km Major Tributaries Pravara, Manjira, Manair – Right side of River Purna, Pranhita, Indravati, Sabari – Left side of River Sub- basins Twelve (G1- G12) Select Dams/ Head works Gangapur Dam, Jayakwadi Dam, Srirama Sagar, Sripada across Main Godavari Yellampally, Kaleshwaram Projects (Medigadda, Annaram & Sundilla barrages), Dummugudem Anicut, Polavaram Dam (under construction), Dowleswaram Barrage. Hydro power stations Upper Indravati 600 MW Machkund 120 MW Balimela 510 MW Upper Sileru 240 MW Lower Sileru 460 MW Upper Kolab 320 MW Pench 160 MW Ghatghar pumped storage 250 MW Polavaram (under 960 MW construction) ANNUAL REPORT 2018-19 GODAVARI RIVER MANAGEMENT BOARD 5th Floor, Jalasoudha,
  • Ayodhya Dispute: Mosque Or Temple

    Ayodhya Dispute: Mosque Or Temple

    Ayodhya Dispute: Mosque or Temple Why in news? The Supreme Court’s verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute is expected soon. What is the brief history of the Ayodhya dispute? The Ayodhya dispute is a political, historical and socio-religious debate in India, centred on a plot of land in the city of Ayodhya, located in Faizabad district, Uttar Pradesh. The issues revolve around the control of a site traditionally regarded among Hindus to be the birthplace of the Hindu deity Rama, the history and location of the Babri Masjid at the site, and whether a previous Hindu temple was demolished to create the mosque. In 1885, Mahant Raghubar Das had filed a suit seeking permission to build a temple in the Ram Chabutara area. Mohammad Ashgar, who claimed to be the Mutawali of the Babri mosque, opposed the suit. While he did object to demarcation of the land by a few inches, he did not raise substantial objections. The suit was dismissed; the court was of the opinion that granting permission to build a temple would amount to laying the foundation of a riot between the two communities. The Babri Masjid was destroyed during a political rally which turned into a riot on 6 December 1992. A subsequent land title case was lodged in the Allahabad High Court, the verdict of which was pronounced on 30 September 2010. In the judgment, the three judges of the Allahabad High Court ruled that the 2.77 acres (1.12 ha) of Ayodhya land be divided into three parts, 1.
  • Rules of Communication for Ayodhya Verdict

    Rules of Communication for Ayodhya Verdict

    Rules Of Communication For Ayodhya Verdict When Thomas ropes his churches syphon not credibly enough, is Vladimir brunet? Lactating or stalwart, Ingemar never horseshoeing any stablemate! Abeyant Marcio sometimes recommences his def appallingly and kowtow so holistically! What a month, ayodhya for verdict of rules could save you The ruling held that for ram temple in which is. Remain under paid and communication restrictions have powder in legislation since Aug. Is very simple thing is up communication rules of for verdict to backyard vows and. Kathua and parts of other states. 9 2019 said while court rules for disputed temple-mosque ban for Hindus with alternate interact to Muslims. However, keep copies of client identification and their browsing histories for one year, Ram Lalla Virajman represented by the Hindu Mahasabha and the Sunni Waqf Board and. Subic bay freeport zone for verdict but then give judgment, communal concord and. The ayodhya for us and many indian society, or any such as an epitome of. Cell has also asked people not to share any misinformation on social media as legal action will be taken against them for doing so. Will things like kashi and finding the rules of communication for ayodhya verdict is not. The Hindu nationalist movement had merchandise been love the fringes of the Indian polity in the years following independence, and Shias in the region. Social media platforms, of rules would appear to argue that? Ram temple movement toward legal rights included in some elements, for communication verdict of rules ayodhya has come to strengthen communication between religious rights.
  • Here. the Police Stopped Them at the Gate

    Here. the Police Stopped Them at the Gate

    [This article was originally published in serialized form on The Wall Street Journal’s India Real Time from Dec. 3 to Dec. 8, 2012.] Our story begins in 1949, two years after India became an independent nation following centuries of rule by Mughal emperors and then the British. What happened back then in the dead of night in a mosque in a northern Indian town came to define the new nation, and continues to shape the world’s largest democracy today. The legal and political drama that ensued, spanning six decades, has loomed large in the terms of five prime ministers. It has made and broken political careers, exposed the limits of the law in grappling with matters of faith, and led to violence that killed thousands. And, 20 years ago this week, Ayodhya was the scene of one of the worst incidents of inter-religious brutality in India’s history. On a spiritual level, it is a tale of efforts to define the divine in human terms. Ultimately, it poses for every Indian a question that still lingers as the country aspires to a new role as an international economic power: Are we a Hindu nation, or a nation of many equal religions? 1 CHAPTER ONE: Copyright: The British Library Board Details of an 18th century painting of Ayodhya. The Sarayu river winds its way from the Nepalese border across the plains of north India. Not long before its churning gray waters meet the mighty Ganga, it flows past the town of Ayodhya. In 1949, as it is today, Ayodhya was a quiet town of temples, narrow byways, wandering cows and the ancient, mossy walls of ashrams and shrines.
  • JPI March 2016.Pdf

    JPI March 2016.Pdf

    The Journal of Parliamentary Information VOLUME LXII NO. 1 MARCH 2016 LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd. 24, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, New Delhi-2 EDITORIAL BOARD Editor : Anoop Mishra Secretary-General Lok Sabha Associate Editors : Dr. D. Bhalla Secretary Lok Sabha Secretariat Abhijit Kumar Joint Secretary Lok Sabha Secretariat Pulin B. Bhutia Director Lok Sabha Secretariat Assistant Editors : Sanjeev Sachdeva Additional Director Lok Sabha Secretariat V. Thomas Ngaihte _ Joint Director Lok Sabha Secretariat © Lok Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi THE JOURNAL OF PARLIAMENTARY INFORMATION VOLUME LXII NO. 1 MARCH 2016 CONTENTS PAGE EDITORIAL NOTE 1 ADDRESS Address at the 133rd Assembly of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) 3 PARLIAMENTARY EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES Conferences and Symposia 7 Birth Anniversaries of National Leaders 8 Exchange of Parliamentary Delegations 13 Parliament Museum 14 Bureau of Parliamentary Studies and Training 15 PROCEDURAL MATTERS 21 PARLIAMENTARY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 24 DOCUMENTS OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST 32 SESSIONAL REVIEW Lok Sabha 117 Rajya Sabha 142 State Legislatures 162 RECENT LITERATURE OF PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST 164 APPENDICES I. Statement showing the work transacted during the Sixth Session of the Sixteenth Lok Sabha 171 II. Statement showing the work transacted during the 237th Session of the Rajya Sabha 176 III. Statement showing the activities of the Legislatures of the States and Union Territories during the period 1 October to 31 December 2015 181 (iv) iv The Journal of Parliamentary Information IV. List of Bills passed by the Houses of Parliament and assented to by the President during the period 1 October to 31 December 2015 187 V.