DOCSLIB.ORG

All-Electric Transit Buses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
All-Electric Transit Buses ALL-ELECTRIC TRANSIT BUSES BYD MOTORS INC. Company Profile & Acknowledgments • BYD was founded in 1995 with a $300k family investment and today has grown to $9 Billion in annual revenue. • BYD is the Worlds largest manufacturer of rechargeable batteries. • BYD entered automotive market in 2003 and today is the Worlds largest manufacturer of Battery Electric Buses. • As of October 2015, BYD achieved 6 consecutive months as the World leader in EV sales. • As of October 2015, BYD also ranks 1st in total EV sales with 43,069 units sold. Company Profile & Acknowledgments • Today 60% of BYD’s public shares are owned by American investors. • Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway is BYD’s single largest public shareholder at 10%. • In 2015, BYD was ranked #15 in Fortune Magazine’s “51 Companies That are Changing the World” list. • In 2010, Bloomberg named BYD a top global technology company. Company Profile • 9 Billion in Annual Revenue • 180,000 Employees Worldwide BYD Provides Green Sustainable Solutions for the Global Community Clean Energy Focus Solar Power Energy Storage LED Lighting 187 Miles Large Luggage Space Spacious Interior Fire Safe 0 Emissions 90 mph Environmentally-Friendly Battery No Heavy Metals Low Center of Gravity Spacious Interior All-Electric Transit Fleet Global Popularity Columbia, Missouri Denver RTD Brazil Stanford University Amsterdam G-Trans, Gardena Beijing Los Angeles Metro Hong Kong Transit Authority Israel Antelope Valley Transit Authority Milan Long Beach Transit Nanjing Hangzhou SolTrans, Vallejo Link Transit, Washington All-Electric Transit Fleet • BYD has a current offering of 7 different Transit Bus and Motor Coach models. • 3,000+ buses in World wide operation today with over 75M miles of data. • 6,000 buses on order for 2016 World Wide • Direct replacement for 80% of all bus routes in US today. • No change in operations, business as normal with better uptime and lower cost. Why Go All-Electric? Because it is time! Introducing the BYD K7 30’ Transit Why Go All-Electric? Because it is time! Introducing the BYD K9 35’ & 40’ Transit Why Go All-Electric? Because it is time! Introducing the BYD K1 60’ Transit Why Go All-Electric? Because it is time! Introducing the BYD C6 23’ Motor Coach Why Go All-Electric? Because it is time! Introducing the BYD C9 40’ Motor Coach Why Go All-Electric? Because it is time! Introducing the BYD C10 45’ Motor Coach Why Go All-Electric? • ZERO emissions, Zero CO2, NOx, PM emissions • Total Lifecycle cost savings far above traditional technologies • Redundant drive systems • 12 year battery warranty significantly reduces lifecycle cost • No Hazardous UREA to store and dispense • No DPF to clean, no soot to dispose of as EPA regulated Hazardous Waste Why Go All-Electric Reason #1 No Emissions • What are some of the environmental benefits? ZERO EMISSIONS • Carbon dioxide (CO2): a 121-ton reduction per year, per electric bus. Over the anticipated 12 year lifetime of the bus, this equates to 1,452 tons per bus. • Nitrogen Oxides (NOx): less 0.5938 tons per year, or 7.1256 tons over the lifetime of the bus. • Particulate matter (PM): reduced by 0.0274 tons per year, or 0.3288 tons over the 12 year lifespan of each electric bus. • Carbon monoxide (CO): reduced 0.310 tons annually or 3.72 tons over the lifetime of the bus. • Hydrocarbons (HC): reduced by 0.0428 tons per year or 0.5136 tons over the 12 year lifespan of each bus. Why Go All-Electric Reason #1 No Emissions • Reduced emissions lead to reduced occurrences of illness. HEALTH BENEFITS According to the EPA’s Diesel Emissions Quantifier Health Benefits Methodology: The reduction in particulate matter from just one electric bus is equivalent to about $55,000 in health benefits savings annually; and over the anticipated 12 year lifetime of the bus, annual health benefit savings are estimated at about $660,000. A fleet of 18 running on the ART would have a savings of $11,880,000 Why Go All-Electric Reason #1 No Emissions • CNG PM 2.5 ref: http://www3.epa.gov/pm/health.html • The size of particles is directly linked to their potential for causing health problems. Small particles less than 10 micrometers in diameter pose the greatest problems, because they can get deep into your lungs, and some may even get into your bloodstream. • Health Effects • Particle pollution - especially fine particles - contains microscopic solids or liquid droplets that are so small that they can get deep into the lungs and cause serious health problems. Numerous scientific studies have linked particle pollution exposure to a variety of problems, including: • premature death in people with heart or lung disease, • nonfatal heart attacks, • irregular heartbeat, • aggravated asthma, • decreased lung function, and • increased respiratory symptoms, such as irritation of the airways, coughing or difficulty breathing. Why Go All-Electric Reason #2 Life Cycle Cost • Cost Savings through reduced maintenance Battery electric buses can save anywhere between 60-80% in operational cost. With a fraction of the moving parts there are fewer things to fail in a battery electric bus. No Hazardous UREA to store and dispense, No DPF to clean, no EPA regulated Hazardous Waste, no oil or filter disposal. Fewer preventative maintenance inspections means less down time. Why Go All-Electric Reason #2 Energy Cost Why Go All-Electric Reason #2 Cost Data Odometer Reading Miles Driven Vehicle R/M Exp Fuel Gallons 13-14 14-15 7//14-6/30/15 4149 4,688.85 1,293.8 144,830.0 151,697.0 6,867.0 4324 9,145.84 1,214.3 138,070.0 146,127.0 8,057.0 4335 6,123.50 2,042.4 139,602.0 151,880.0 12,278.0 4336 8,234.28 1,905.9 128,819.0 140,030.0 11,211.0 4449 9,622.50 1,989.7 138,833.0 149,833.0 11,000.0 4450 8,547.38 2,933.8 129,221.0 144,371.0 15,150.0 4617 13,603.84 3,464.1 119,525.0 140,693.0 21,168.0 4661 12,302.02 2,698.7 86,693.0 103,315.0 16,622.0 4672 10,820.39 3,218.4 86,677.0 106,183.0 19,506.0 4824 7,103.37 3,101.1 31,034.0 46,451.0 15,417.0 4837 1,422.07 1,605.0 27,317.0 36,396.0 9,079.0 Average R/M Average Miles Average Miles 8,425.09 2,315.2 13,305.0 1.606620466 5.746803732 MCPM MPG Why Go All-Electric Reason #2 Total LCCA Why Go All-Electric Reason #2 Operational Cost 20 year fleet total cost Description Cost QTY Description Cost QTY Diesel Bus Cost $ 140,000.00 2 $ 280,000.00 BYD Bus Cost $ 450,000.00 1 $ 450,000.00 Repair, Maint, Fuel $ 54,072.00 20 $ 1,081,440.00 Interest $ 182,350.94 1 $ 182,350.94 Repair, Maint, Energy $ 7,068.00 20 $ 141,360.00 20 year lifecycle cost per vehicle $ 1,361,440.00 20 year lifecycle cost per vehicle $ 773,710.94 Total Fleet Cost 20 years $ 16,337,280.00 Total Fleet Cost 20 years $ 9,284,531.28 20 year savings on a fleet of 12 BYD buses $ 7,052,748.72 Why Go All-Electric Reason #3 Redundant Drive • High-efficiency, in-wheel traction motors deliver an impressive 1,106 Ft/Lbs. of torque • 30K Fluid replacement allows for simplified maintenance • Energy recovery and battery recharging through optimal regenerative braking reduces brake component wear Drive-axle diameter Type BYD-3425TZA Max power 90kw Motor Average power 60kw diameter Max torque 1,106 Ft/Lbs Max rotate speed 5000rpm Motor quantity 2 Ratio 10 Brake Knorr Gradeability ≥18% Why Go All-Electric Reason #3 Less is More • Hundreds of moving parts instead of Thousands • 30K Fluid replacement allows for simplified maintenance • Solid State Components Why Go All-Electric Reason #4 Superior Batteries The first battery designed specifically for use in vehicles • BYD batteries have a 40+ year Reliability & service life Longevity • 70% capacity even after 10,000 cycles = 28 years • No propensity for fire or explosion Safety even under the most stressful conditions • Zero emissions and zero pollution Sustainability • 100% Recyclable, no heavy metals or caustic materials Thermal Balancing Across Cell Why Go All-Electric Reason #4 Superior Batteries BYD Lithium-ion Iron-Phosphate Battery Module • Long Life Tested 10,000 cycles with over 70% capacity • 10k/365=27.4 years • At 83 miles a day, two days of operation per cycle. • High energy output and high energy density average • Stable performance in both high and low temperatures from 140F to -22F Why Go All-Electric? #7 Bi-Directional Inverters V2L Emergency Response • One 40’ BYD bus can power a Red Cross Medical Tent for a week. V2V Rolling Generators • Utilize a bus to charge other fleet vehicles. V2L Peak Demand Shaving • Utilize Vehicles as Energy Storage to feed back to grid during peak demand. BYD K7M Body Structure BYD Battery Layout and Weight Distribution How to Go All-Electric? • Simple installation – each BYD vehicle includes an easy to install and operate charging interface Net-Zero Power, Pollution, Impact What does “Off-Grid” Mean? Collect solar power all day, charge buses from storage at night 10, operating 40-foot Electric Buses: Energy function: 8 hours of sunlight x 405 kW of Solar = 3240 kWh generated 3, 1.1 MWh ESS containers = 3300 kWh “storage capacity” OK 3, 300 kW inverters can discharge = 900 kW rate OK Power interfaces/ ESS charge 10 buses at 80 kW = 800 kW OK 10 buses x 324 kWh energy needed = 3240 kWh - OK Example: 132 kW Solar System – Bonaire Transit Example: 132 kW Solar System – Bonaire Transit Example: 132 kW Solar System – Bonaire Transit .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electricity Consumption and Battery Lifespan Estimation for Transit Electric Buses: Drivetrain Simulations and Electrochemical Modelling
    Electricity consumption and battery lifespan estimation for transit electric buses: drivetrain simulations and electrochemical modelling by Ana¨ıssiaFranca B.Eng, University of Victoria, 2015 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF APPLIED SCIENCE in the Department of Mechanical Engineering c Anaissia Franca, 2018 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopying or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Electricity consumption and battery lifespan estimation for transit electric buses: drivetrain simulations and electrochemical modelling by Ana¨ıssiaFranca B.Eng, University of Victoria, 2015 Supervisory Committee Dr. Curran Crawford, Supervisor (Department of Mechanical Engineering) Dr. Ned Djilali, Supervisor (Department of Mechanical engineering) iii ABSTRACT This thesis presents a battery electric bus energy consumption model (ECONS-M) coupled with an electrochemical battery capacity fade model (CFM). The underlying goals of the project were to develop analytical tools to support the integration of battery electric buses. ECONS-M projects the operating costs of electric bus and the potential emission reductions compared to diesel vehicles for a chosen transit route. CFM aims to predict the battery pack lifetime expected under the specific driving conditions of the route. A case study was run for a transit route in Victoria, BC chosen as a candidate to deploy a 2013 BYD electric bus. The novelty of this work mainly lays in its application to battery electric buses, as well as in the coupling of the ECONS-M and the electrochemical model to predict how long the batteries can last if the electric bus is deployed on a specific transit route everyday.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Analysis of Battery Electric Transit Buses (PDF)
    Financial Analysis of Battery Electric Transit Buses Caley Johnson, Erin Nobler, Leslie Eudy, and Matthew Jeffers National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5400-74832 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC June 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Financial Analysis of Battery Electric Transit Buses Caley Johnson, Erin Nobler, Leslie Eudy, and Matthew Jeffers National Renewable Energy Laboratory Suggested Citation Johnson, Caley, Erin Nobler, Leslie Eudy, and Matthew Jeffers. 2020. Financial Analysis of Battery Electric Transit Buses. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5400-74832. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/74832.pdf NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5400-74832 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC June 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NOTICE This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Vehicle Technologies Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Available Zero-Emission Technologies and Funding Opportunities
    Summary of Available Zero-Emission Technologies and Funding Opportunities Prepared by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District June 2018 Summary of Available Zero-Emission Technologies and Funding Opportunities: June 2018 Table of Contents Technology Readiness Level of Zero-Emission Technologies ................................................................3 Buses ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Light Duty Vehicles .................................................................................................................................... 4 Medium- and Heavy-Duty Trucks ............................................................................................................. 4 Transport Refrigeration Units ................................................................................................................... 5 Mobile Cargo Handling Equipment ........................................................................................................... 5 Construction & Earthmoving Equipment .................................................................................................. 6 Locomotives .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Ocean-Going Vessels ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • China Autos Asia China Automobiles & Components
    Deutsche Bank Markets Research Industry Date 18 May 2016 China Autos Asia China Automobiles & Components Vincent Ha, CFA Fei Sun, CFA Research Analyst Research Analyst (+852 ) 2203 6247 (+852 ) 2203 6130 [email protected] [email protected] F.I.T.T. for investors What you should know about China's new energy vehicle (NEV) market Many players, but only a few are making meaningful earnings contributions One can question China’s target to put 5m New Energy Vehicles on the road by 2020, or its ambition to prove itself a technology leader in the field, but the surge in demand with 171k vehicles sold in 4Q15 cannot be denied. Policy imperatives and government support could ensure three-fold volume growth by 2020, which would make China half of this developing global market. New entrants are proliferating, with few clear winners as yet, but we conclude that Yutong and BYD have the scale of NEV sales today to support Buy ratings. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Deutsche Bank AG/Hong Kong Deutsche Bank does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. Thus, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. DISCLOSURES AND ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS ARE LOCATED IN APPENDIX 1. MCI (P) 057/04/2016. Deutsche Bank Markets Research Asia Industry Date China 18 May 2016 Automobiles & China
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Reduction of CO2 Emissions in Urban Environments by Replacing Conventional City Buses by Electric Bus Fleets: Spain Case Study
    Article Analysis of the Reduction of CO2 Emissions in Urban Environments by Replacing Conventional City Buses by Electric Bus Fleets: Spain Case Study Edwin R. Grijalva 1,2 and José María López Martínez 1,* 1 University Institute for Automobile Research (INSIA), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28031 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 2 Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería e Industrias, Universidad UTE, Bourgeois N34-102 & Rumipamba, Quito 171508, Ecuador * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-913-365-304 Received: 14 December 2018; Accepted: 29 January 2019; Published: 7 February 2019 Abstract: The emissions of CO2 gas caused by transport in urban areas are increasingly serious, and the public transport sector plays a vital role in society, especially when considering the increased demands for mobility. New energy technologies in urban mobility are being introduced, as evidenced by the electric vehicle. We evaluated the positive environmental effects in terms of CO2 emissions that would be produced by the replacement of conventional urban transport bus fleets by electric buses. The simulation of an electric urban bus conceptual model is presented as a case study. The model is validated using the speed and height profiles of the most representative route within the city of Madrid—the C1 line. We assumed that the vehicle fleet is charged using the electric grid at night, when energy demand is low, the cost of energy is low, and energy is produced with a large provision of renewable energy, principally wind power. For the results, we considered the percentage of fleet replacement and the Spanish electricity mix.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Simulation of a Battery Swapping System for Public Transport
    POLITECNICO DI TORINO Dipartimento di Meccanica e Aerospaziale (DIMEAS) Master’s Degree in Automotive Engineering Master’s Degree Thesis Design and simulation of a Battery Swapping System for public transport Supervisors: Author: Prof. Giulia Bruno Utkucan KARADUMAN Prof. Franco Lombardi Dott. Alberto Faveto February 2021 Acknowledgment I would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Giulia Bruno as well as Dott. Alberto Faveto for giving me the opportunity to make research on this interesting subject and for providing guidance and help throughout this research. I am also thankful to all my friends who shared their supports with me all the time. Seren, Nogay, Musa, and Togrul are the ones who deserve a special thanks for being always there for me. Lastly, I would like to acknowledge with gratitude, the support, and love of my family. 1 2 Abstract Nowadays, the automotive industry faces one of the biggest transformations ever. As the concerns about greenhouse gas emissions and global crude oil demand grow, the automotive industry undergoes a change towards the use of electric vehicles (EVs) over traditional internal combustion engine vehicles. For a greater revolution, EVs need to point out issues such as long charging times, insufficient charging infrastructure, low battery performance, high price, fleet electrification, as well as powering renewable energy-based charging grids. As a result of these problems, vehicle manufacturers have started to investigate and invest in more cost-efficient and innovative solutions to engage with the issues related to using electric vehicles. For instance, in order to overcome the long battery charging times, the battery swapping systems (BSS) have been introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Upgrading: on Track for a Rerating
    Hong Kong Consumer Discretionary 11 July 2016 BYD (1211 HK) BYD Target price: HKD65.00 (from HKD50.00) Share price (11 Jul): HKD47.60 | Up/downside: +36.5% Upgrading: on track for a rerating Kelvin Lau (852) 2848 4467 We see strong SUV and bus sales leading to a margin improvement [email protected] Subsidy cut should benefit strong players like BYD in the long run Brian Lam (852) 2532 4341 Upgrading to Buy (1) from Outperform (2); raising TP to HKD65 [email protected] What's new: Following our recent discussions with BYD management, we Forecast revisions (%) are turning more positive on the company’s long-term outlook. We see Year to 31 Dec 16E 17E 18E grounds for a multi-year rerating for BYD, and hence upgrade our Revenue change 18.5 2.7 6.9 Net profit change 82.4 46.6 52.0 recommendation by one notch to Buy (1). Core EPS (FD) change 82.4 46.6 52.0 Source: Daiwa forecasts What's the impact: Margin improvement from new energy vehicles (NEVs). As per the latest YTD May data, BYD’s Tang SUV (launched mid- Share price performance 2015) contributed additional average monthly sales of around 3,000 units. (HKD) (%) Management expects the Tang to record sales of 5,000 units/month by 50 150 end-2016. Orders for the K9 electric bus have been ramping up, with 44 133 around 6,000 in hand; we expect BYD to achieve 13,000 unit orders in 38 115 31 98 2016 (previous estimate: 10,000).
    [Show full text]
  • Powertrain Modeling and Range Estimation of the Electric Bus
    Powertrain Modeling and Range Estimation of The Electric Bus Donkyu Baek* [donkyu at cbnu.ac.kr] School of Electronics Engineering Chungbuk National University Presenter Dr. Donkyu Baek Assistant Professor in Chungbuk National University, Korea Got Ph.D. in KAIST (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology), Korea Post doc experiences Mar. 2018 ~ Dec. 2018: KAIST, Korea Jan. 2019 ~ Jan. 2020: Politecnico di Torino, Italy Research interest EV/drone powertrain modeling EV/drone runtime optimization EV/drone design-time optimization 2 EVs Are Invading the ICEV Market Higher efficiency Average 141 kWh for ICEVs and 20 kWh for EVs when drive 100 km Environmental friendliness + government promotion Quiet and comfort ride Electric vehicles Gasoline vehicles 400400 Veyron 300300 www.fueleconomy.gov Escalade GL63 AMG Mustang M5 200200 Corvette (kWh/100 mi) (kWh/100 100 100 Prius (hybrid) Energy consumption consumption Energy Prius (electric) Volt Twizy Leaf Model S 0 1625 3250 4875 6500 0 1625 3250 4875 6500 Curb weights (lbs) 3 Limitation of EVs EVs still cannot reach the territory of ICEVs Short driving range 27 kWh battery pack (Soul EV) versus 514 kWh fuel tank (Soul) Long charging time 5 hours with level 2 and 30 minutes with level 3 battery charging systems Driving ranges from Los Angeles Tesla Model S (350 km) Toyota RAV4 (166 km) tia.ucsb.edu 4 3 Table 3 Battery Motor power Gear ratio Energy Battery size Energy Energy Driving Driving Note 220 Issue Target driving profile pack (kW) (times) consumption (kJ) (kWh) consumption (kWh)
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Zero-Emission Heavy-Duty
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Zero-Emission Heavy-Duty Vehicle Integration in Support of a 100% Renewable Electric Grid DISSERTATION Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Engineering with a concentration in Environmental Engineering by Kate E. Forrest Dissertation Committee: Professor Scott Samuelsen, Chair Professor Barbara Finlayson-Pitts Professor Stephen Ritchie 2019 i © 2019 Kate E. Forrest ii DEDICATION To my family for their unconditional love and support ii TABLE OF CONTENTS NOMENCLATURE ............................................................................................................................ v LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................. xii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................. xiv CURRICULUM VITAE ..................................................................................................................... xv ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... xix Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Bus Technology
    ELECTRIC BUS TECHNOLOGY TRANSPORT RESEARCH REPORT June 2017 BETTER TRANSPORT • BETTER PLACES • BETTER CHOICES in association with the Transport and Economic Research Institute 1 ATTACHMENT A - TTA17-005 RFQ: Passenger Transport Research and Strategic Advisory Services – March 2017 DOCUMENT INFORMATION Acknowledgements This research was undertaken with partial funding from Callaghan Innovation. For further information on the findings of this report please contact: Australia New Zealand Leslie Carter Jenson Varghese Managing Director Regional Manager New Zealand [email protected] [email protected] +61 7 3320 3600 +64 9 377 5590 This report has been prepared by MRCagney Pty Limited (MRCagney). It is provided to the general public for information purposes only, and MRCagney makes no express or implied warranties, and expressly disclaims all warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use with respect to any data included in this report. MRCagney does not warrant as to the accuracy or completeness of any information included in the report and excludes any liability as a result of any person relying on the information set out in the report. This report is not intended to constitute professional advice nor does the report take into account the individual circumstances or objectives of the person who reads it. www.mrcagney.com ii Electric Bus Technology - Final Report - June 2017 CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS viii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Buses in Public Transport 1 1.2 Why Electric Buses, Not Improved Diesel
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Mobility the Chinese
    Frank Yang • Mattias Goldmann • Jakob Lagercrantz Sustainable mobility the Chinese way Opportunities for European cooperation and inspiration Frank Yang • Mattias Goldmann • Jakob Lagercrantz Sustainable mobility the Chinese way Opportunities for European cooperation and inspiration Sustainable mobility the Chinese way – opportunities for European cooperation and inspiration Authors: Frank Yang, Mattias Goldmann and Jakob Lagercrantz Graphic design: Ivan Panov Cover design material: Shutterstock Fores, Kungsbroplan 2, 112 27 Stockholm 08-452 26 60 [email protected] www.fores.se European Liberal Forum asbl, Rue des Deux Eglises 39, 1000 Brussels, Belgium [email protected] www.liberalforum.eu Printed by Exakta Print, Malmö, Sweden, 2018 ISBN: 978-91-87379-45-1 Published by the European Liberal Forum asbl with the support of Fores. Co-funded by the European Parliament. Neither the European Parliament nor the European Liberal Forum asbl are responsible for the content of this publication, or for any use that may be made of it. The views expressed herein are those of the authors alone. These views do not necessarily reflect those of the European Parliament and/or the European Liberal Forum asbl. © 2018 The European Liberal Forum (ELF). This publication can be downloaded for free on www.liberalforum.eu or www.fores. se. We use Creative Commons, meaning that it is allowed to copy and distribute the content for a non-profit purpose if the author and the European Liberal Forum are mentioned as copyright owners. (Read more about creative commons here: http://creative- commons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) The European Liberal Forum (ELF) is the foundation of the European Liberal Democrats, the ALDE Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsidy Cut for NEV Bus Impacts Earnings Outlook; Down to Neutral
    January 13, 2017 ACTION Removed from Asia Pacific Buy List BYD Co. (1211.HK) Equity Research Subsidy cut for NEV bus impacts earnings outlook; down to Neutral What happened Investment Profile We lower our TP and downgrade BYD to Neutral (from Buy) following the Low High reduced 2017 subsidies for new energy vehicles (particularly NEV bus), Growth Growth Returns * Returns * announced on Dec 30. Our revised TP implies 2% upside vs. -1% coverage Multiple Multiple avg. and we find current valuation fair given (1) its 1.9X 12m forward P/B is Volatility Volatility within historical median -1std; (2) the NEV business (incl. EV battery) trades Percentile 20th 40th 60th 80th 100th at 1.4X P/S and 14.4X P/E 2020E, vs. Tesla’s 1.5X and 25.0X; and (3) weaker BYD Co. (1211.HK) growth outlook post 2017 NEV policy announcement. Since reinstating Asia Pacific Autos & Autoparts Peer Group Average * Returns = Return on Capital For a complete description of the investment coverage of BYD at Buy on Aug 31, 2016, the stock is -20% vs. the HSCEI profile measures please refer to the +2% as a result of uncertainties surrounding the NEV subsidy policy. disclosure section of this document. Key data Current Current view Price (HK$) 43.45 As per the latest NEV subsidy policy for 2017: (1) maximum central 12 month price target (HK$) 44.52 Market cap (HK$ mn / US$ mn) 89,076.8 / 11,487.2 government subsidy for NEV bus is to be cut by 25%-70%; (2) local Foreign ownership (%) -- government subsidy not to exceed 50% of central government subsidy; 12/15 12/16E 12/17E 12/18E (3) NEV passenger car subsidy to be cut by 20% as expected, maximum EPS (Rmb) New 1.14 2.00 2.13 2.91 NEV truck/special purpose vehicle subsidy to be increased, and fuel cell EPS revision (%) 0.0 1.0 (14.8) (9.1) EPS growth (%) 537.9 75.4 6.3 37.0 vehicle subsidy to stay unchanged; (4) technology qualification standard to EPS (dil) (Rmb) New 1.14 2.00 2.13 2.91 P/E (X) 28.7 19.3 18.2 13.3 be hiked (battery energy density, mileage, fast charge ratio, etc.).
    [Show full text]