DOCSLIB.ORG

C-Band. in Order

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
C-Band. in Order February 7, 2020 FACT SHEET1 Expanding Flexible Use of the 3.7 to 4.2 GHz Band Report and Order and Order of Proposed Modification - GN Docket No. 18-122 Background: In recognition of the ever-growing demand for spectrum-based services and to facilitate the development of advanced wireless services, including 5G, this proposed Report and Order and Order of Proposed Modification would make a significant amount of mid-band spectrum in the 3.7-4.2 GHz band available for flexible-use in a manner that ensures the continued, uninterrupted delivery of services currently offered in the band. Through a Commission-led auction, the item will ensure that 280 megahertz of spectrum is repurposed from Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) and Fixed Service (FS) to flexible-use, that the public recovers a substantial portion of the value of this resource, and that this spectrum will be made available quickly for 5G and other advanced wireless deployments. What the Order Would Do: • Add a mobile allocation, except aeronautical mobile, to the 3.7-4.0 GHz band. • Transition 280 megahertz, plus a 20-megahertz guard band, from incumbent use to flexible-use in the contiguous United States by September 30, 2025, through a Commission-led public auction. • Provide eligible space station operators with the option to accelerate the clearing according to the following accelerated timeline: (1) clearing 120 megahertz (3.7-3.82 GHz) by September 30, 2021, and (2) clearing the remaining 180 megahertz (3.82-4.0 GHz) by September 30, 2023. If they meet those benchmarks, they will receive accelerated relocation payments from flexible-use licensees. • Require incumbent FS licensees in the contiguous United States to relocate their point-to-point links to other bands, by September 30, 2023. • Provide both incumbent FSS and FS licensees with reimbursement of reasonable relocation costs paid by flexible-use licensees as a condition on their license. • Establish a Relocation Payment Clearinghouse to manage the intake, payout, and auditing of relocation funds, mediate cost-related disputes, and provide progress reports to the Commission. • Establish a Relocation Coordinator to coordinate the migration and filtering of incumbent earth stations to ensure uninterrupted service during and following the transition. • Adopt service and technical rules for flexible-use licensees in the 280 megahertz of spectrum designated for transition to flexible-use. What the Order of Proposed Modification Would Do: • Propose to modify the licenses and authorizations of all 3.7-4.2 GHz band FSS licensees and market access holders within the contiguous United States to limit their operations to the 4.0-4.2 GHz band no later than September 30, 2025. 1 This document is being released as part of a “permit-but-disclose” proceeding. Any presentations or views on the subject expressed to the Commission or its staff, including by email, must be filed in GN Docket No. 18-122, which may be accessed via the Electronic Comment Filing System (https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/). Before filing, participants should familiarize themselves with the Commission’s ex parte rules, including the general prohibition on presentations (written and oral) on matters listed on the Sunshine Agenda, which is typically released a week prior to the Commission’s meeting. See 47 CFR § 1.1200 et seq. Federal Communications Commission FCC-CIRC2002-01 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Expanding Flexible Use of the 3.7 to 4.2 GHz ) GN Docket No. 18-122 Band REPORT AND ORDER AND ORDER OF PROPOSED MODIFICATION* Adopted: [] Released: [] By the Commission: TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................... 5 A. Current Use of the 3.7-4.2 GHz Band and Adjacent Bands ............................................................. 8 B. Procedural History ......................................................................................................................... 13 III. REPORT AND ORDER ...................................................................................................................... 20 A. Public Auction of 280 Megahertz of C-Band Spectrum for Flexible Use ..................................... 22 1. Allocation of the 3.7-4.2 GHz Band ........................................................................................ 54 2. Competitive Bidding Rules ..................................................................................................... 59 3. Licensing and Operating Rules ............................................................................................... 71 B. The Transition of FSS Operations ............................................................................................... 110 1. Incumbent FSS Operations .................................................................................................... 113 2. Clearing the 3.7-4.0 GHz Band of FSS Operations ............................................................... 124 3. Transition Schedule ............................................................................................................... 154 4. Relocation and Accelerated Relocation Payments ................................................................ 177 5. Relocation Payment Clearinghouse ....................................................................................... 225 6. The Logistics of Relocation .................................................................................................. 253 7. Other FSS Transition Issues .................................................................................................. 280 C. Fixed Use in the C-Band .............................................................................................................. 283 1. Sunsetting Incumbent Point-to-Point Fixed Services ............................................................ 284 2. More Intensive Point-to-Multipoint Fixed Use ..................................................................... 291 D. Technical Rules for the 3.7-4.2 GHz Band .................................................................................. 294 1. Power Levels ......................................................................................................................... 296 2. Out-of-band Emissions .......................................................................................................... 304 * This document has been circulated for tentative consideration by the Commission at its February 28, 2020 open meeting. The issues referenced in this document and the Commission’s ultimate resolution of those issues remain under consideration and subject to change. This document does not constitute any official action by the Commission. However, the Chairman has determined that, in the interest of promoting the public’s ability to understand the nature and scope of issues under consideration, the public interest would be served by making this document publicly available. The FCC’s ex parte rules apply and presentations are subject to “permit-but- disclose” ex parte rules. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1206, 1.1200(a). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize themselves with the Commission’s ex parte rules, including the general prohibition on presentations (written and oral) on matters listed on the Sunshine Agenda, which is typically released a week prior to the Commission’s meeting. See 47 CFR §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203 Federal Communications Commission FCC-CIRC2002-01 3. Antenna Height Limits .......................................................................................................... 312 4. Service Area Boundary Limit ................................................................................................ 315 5. International Boundary Requirements ................................................................................... 317 6. Other Part 27 Rules ............................................................................................................... 318 7. Protection of Incumbent FSS Earth Stations ......................................................................... 320 8. Protection of TT&C Earth Stations ....................................................................................... 334 9. Coexistence with Aeronautical Radionavigation .................................................................. 346 10. Coexistence with the Citizens Broadband Radio Service ..................................................... 351 IV. PROCEDURAL MATTERS .............................................................................................................. 353 V. ORDERING CLAUSES ..................................................................................................................... 361 APPENDIX A—Final Rules APPENDIX B—Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis APPENDIX C—List of Commenters I. INTRODUCTION 1. The demand for wireless broadband services and for radio spectrum continues to grow dramatically.1 At the same time that mobile traffic is surging in many sections of the United States, however, there are some communities that still lack access to meaningful wireless broadband connectivity. To enable the development of next generation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 230/Monday, November 30, 2020
    76450 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 230 / Monday, November 30, 2020 / Rules and Regulations Commission’s requirement that certain the Commission. It is appropriate to apply SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: commonly traded interest rate swaps and this exemption to the holding companies of credit default swaps be cleared following these financial entities. Electronic Availability their execution.2 The new exemptions may One commenter, Better Markets, expressed This document and additional be elected by several classes of counterparties concern that the number of entities that will information concerning OFAC are that may enter into these swaps, namely: now have an exemption from the clearing available on OFAC’s website requirement has grown over time, leading to Sovereign nations; central banks; (www.treasury.gov/ofac). ‘‘international financial institutions’’ of the potential for greater risk, reduction in which sovereign nations are members; bank liquidity in cleared markets, and complexity Background holding companies, and savings and loan in managing the exemptions. As described in holding companies, whose assets total no the preamble to the final rule, swap data On March 8, 2015, the President, more than $10 billion; and community repository data indicates that over the past invoking the authority of, inter alia, the development financial institutions several years the number and scope of swaps International Emergency Economic recognized by the U.S. Treasury Department. entered into by these institutions that will be Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706), Today’s final rule notes that many of these included within the exemptions has been issued Executive Order (E.O.) 13692 of entities have actually relied on existing relief, relatively limited.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
    USCA Case #17-1210 Document #1736835 Filed: 06/20/2018 Page 1 of 4 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 17-1209 September Term, 2017 FILED ON: JUNE 20, 2018 PMCM TV, LLC, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANTITRUST DIVISION, RESPONDENTS CBS CORPORATION, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 17-1210 On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Federal Communications Commission Before: GRIFFITH, WILKINS and KATSAS, Circuit Judges. J U D G M E N T These cases were considered on petitions for review from the Federal Communications Commission, and on the briefs and oral arguments of the parties. The Court has afforded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See Fed. R. App. P. 36; D.C. Cir. R. 36(d). It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petitions for review of the orders of the Federal Communications Commission be DENIED. Petitioner PMCM TV, LLC obtained a license from the Federal Communications Commission to operate television station WJLP in northern New Jersey on radio-frequency channel 3, the same radio-frequency channel used by PMCM’s predecessor station in Nevada. However, the FCC assigned WJLP virtual channel 33, the channel to which viewers tune their televisions in order to watch WJLP. The FCC did this to protect the “Channel 3” brand identity of intervenor broadcasters that already used virtual channel 3 in service areas that overlapped with that of WJLP. For similar reasons, the FCC refused to require cable operators to carry WJLP on cable television as “Channel 3.” PMCM seeks review of both decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B – Communications Received
    APPENDIX B – COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED This appendix contains all the communications received during the post-centerline release period from November 18, 2010 through December 31, 2011. In addition, the table below contains contact and organization names and the communication identification number assigned to each communication. The communication text in this appendix is ordered by the communication identification number. For reference, the table below is ordered by last name followed by illegible and anonymous signatures. Referenced attachments can be found by searching for the communication on the project website http://www.bpa.gov/corporate/I-5-EIS/search.cfm. Number Date Name - First Name - Last Organization 13665 7/20/2011 ANDREW ABBOTT 13665 7/20/2011 JACK ABERNATHY 13665 7/20/2011 CRYSTAL L ADAMS 13395 1/29/2011 PHIL AKELY 13667 7/20/2011 AMBER ALEXANDER 13665 7/20/2011 BOB ALEXANDER 13665 7/20/2011 CHEE ALLISON 13755 10/6/2011 ROBERT AMMONS 13683 8/3/2011 CANDICE D ANDERSON 13418 2/10/2011 CURTIS L ANDERSON 13207 12/2/2010 M. ANDERSON 13073 11/22/2010 GINA L ANDREWS STATE OF WASHINGTON, RECREATION AND 13836 12/15/2011 JIM ANEST CONSERVATION OFFICE 13665 7/20/2011 TRAVIS APP 13665 7/20/2011 BOB APPLING 13665 7/20/2011 JEREMY ARIONUS 13665 7/20/2011 CHUCK ARNST 13322 12/8/2010 DALE W AROLA 13321 12/9/2010 DALE W AROLA 13320 12/10/2010 DALE W AROLA 13527 1/28/2011 DALE W AROLA 13320 12/10/2010 DARREN F AROLA 13527 1/28/2011 DARREN F AROLA 13321 12/9/2010 DWAYNE D AROLA 13527 1/28/2011 DWAYNE D AROLA 13665 7/20/2011 BRIAN ASBURRY 13665
    [Show full text]
  • Softbank Corp. Annual Report 2019 Softbank Corp
    SoftBank Corp. Annual Report 2019 SoftBank Corp. We don’t just dream. We make things happen. We’re going beyond just being a carrier — we’re transforming into a visionary platformer. We don’t just dream up things. We take the world’s advanced ideas, and turn them into reality with our drive to make things happen. We do this so tomorrow’s people will be the happiest in human history. SoftBank Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2019 1 Introducing Our First Annual Report SoftBank Group Corporate Philosophy Ken Miyauchi President & CEO Information Revolution SoftBank Corp. — Happiness for Everyone In December 2018, SoftBank Corp. (the “Company” or “SoftBank”) of this technological evolution, SoftBank has expanded its business listed its shares on the First Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange. scale in step with society’s growth. The second is our ability to grow I would like to begin by expressing my sincere gratitude to our businesses. We have expanded our business operations by bringing shareholders, investors, and other stakeholders for their support together and regenerating companies in crisis, including JAPAN to date. TELECOM CO., LTD., Vodafone K.K., WILLCOM, Inc., and eAccess Ltd. The third is our ability to overcome adverse environments. In its role as a strategic holding company, our parent company Sometimes, we have faced headwinds, but we have always taken SoftBank Group Corp. (“SoftBank Group”). is accelerating the pace on adverse situations directly, focused on self-improvement, and of global investment in accordance with the Cluster of No. 1 AI thereby achieved further growth. Strategy. Meanwhile, as the primary operating company in Japan With a view to communicating our growth strategy and related and with the telecommunications business at its core, SoftBank is initiatives more clearly, we have issued our first annual report, Since our founding, the SoftBank Group has sought to use the engaging in a wide range of businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Development of Net Neutrality Conditions in Japan: Impact of Fiber Wholesale and Long-Term Evolution (LTE)
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Jitsuzumi, Toshiya Conference Paper Recent Development of Net Neutrality Conditions in Japan: Impact of Fiber Wholesale and Long-term Evolution (LTE) 26th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): "What Next for European Telecommunications?", Madrid, Spain, 24th-27th June, 2015 Provided in Cooperation with: International Telecommunications Society (ITS) Suggested Citation: Jitsuzumi, Toshiya (2015) : Recent Development of Net Neutrality Conditions in Japan: Impact of Fiber Wholesale and Long-term Evolution (LTE), 26th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): "What Next for European Telecommunications?", Madrid, Spain, 24th-27th June, 2015, International Telecommunications Society (ITS), Calgary This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/127152 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • Cisco Jabber Have You Heard About the Latest Functionality?
    #CLUS Cisco Jabber Have you heard about the latest functionality? Shane Long Technical Marketing Engineer BRKCOL-2221 #CLUS Agenda • Recent Highlights • Configuration • Security • Media Enhancements • Meeting Experience • Jabber in VDI • Jabber team messaging mode • Looking ahead • Summary #CLUS BRKCOL-2221 © 2019 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Public 3 Cisco Webex Teams Questions? Use Cisco Webex Teams to chat with the speaker after the session How 1 Find this session in the Cisco Live Mobile App 2 Click “Join the Discussion” 3 Install Webex Teams or go directly to the team space 4 Enter messages/questions in the team space Webex Teams will be moderated cs.co/ciscolivebot#BRKCOL-2221 by the speaker until June 16, 2019. #CLUS © 2019 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Public 4 Some highlights of recent Jabber releases ` IM&P Active Control Team Persistent Chat Multiline (CMS) messaging for Mobile mode Coming Soon ` SIP OAuth Jabber Jabber Meeting Phone Mode Chromebook config tool with Contacts VDI Update Controls support (Webex) Jabber 12.0 Jabber 12.1 Jabber 12.5 Jabber 12.6 Jabber 12.7 2018 2019 MARCH and much more… AUGUST #CLUS BRKCOL-2221 © 2019 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Public 5 Jabber Configuration A Brief History of Cisco UC Client Configuration IP Communicator Unified Personal Communicator Jabber 9.x-12.1 Jabber + UC Manager12.5 • Manual • Registry Keys • DNS SRV • DNS SRV • Virtual MAC Address • Unified Presence Server • jabber-config.xml (manual XML) • Service Profiles (including jabber • Service Profiles configuration) New! #CLUS BRKCOL-2221 © 2019 Cisco and/or its affiliates.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States-Japan Negotiations on Interconnection Pricing
    Volume 43, Number 2, Spring 2002 Exporting Telecommunications Regulation: The United States-Japan Negotiations on Interconnection Pricing Jeffrey H. Rohlfs∗ J. Gregory Sidak∗∗ I. Introduction On February 15, 1997, seventy countries working within the framework of the World Trade Organization (WTO) agreed on a multilateral reduction of regulatory barriers to competition in international telecommunications services.1 At the time, the signatory nations to the WTO agreement on tele- communications services represented markets generating ninety-five percent of the $600 billion in global telecommunications revenues.2 Beginning January 1, 1998, those nations started a phased process to open their tele- communications markets to competition. Since 1997, the U.S. government has attempted to use the WTO agreement on telecommunications services as a vehicle for “exporting” American principles of telecommunications regula- tion to other nations. Part II of this Article explains how in 1997 the United States took the position that the WTO agreement on telecommunications services requires ∗ A.B., Amherst College, 1965; Ph.D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1969. Principal, Strate- gic Policy Research, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland. ∗∗ A.B. Stanford University, 1977; A.M., J.D., Stanford University, 1981. F. K. Weyerhaeuser Fellow in Law and Economics Emeritus, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C. The views expressed here are solely our own, and not those of the American Enterprise Institute, which does not take institutional positions on speciªc legislative or regulatory matters. We thank Martin Cave, Robert W. Crandall, Gary Epstein, Harold Furchtgott-Roth, Edward M. Graham, William Lake, Herbert Marks, Mark S. McConnell, John Thorne, and Masayoshi Yamashita for helpful comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Sensors for Applications
    OVERVIEW OF SENSORS FOR APPLICATIONS Deepak Putrevu Head, MTDD/AMHTDG EM SPECTRUM Visible 0.4-0.7μm Near infrared (NIR) 0.7-1.5μm Optical Infrared Shortwave infrared (SWIR) 1.5-3.0μm Mid-wave infrared (MWIR) 3.0-8.0μm (OIR) Region Longwave IR(LWIR)/Thermal IR(TIR) 8.0-15μm Far infrared (FIR) Beyond15μm Gamma Rays X Rays UV Visible NIR SWIR Thermal IR Microwave P-band: ~0.25 – 1 GHz Microwave Region L-band: 1 -2 GHz S-band: 2-4 GHz •Sensors are 24x365 C-band: 4-8 GHz •Signal data characteristics X-band: 8-12 GHz unique to the microwave region of the EM spectrum Ku-band: 12-18 GHz K-band: 18-26 GHz •Response is primarily governed by geometric Ka-band: 26-40 GHz structures and hence V-band: 40 - 75 GHz complementary to optical W-band: 75-110 GHz imaging mm-wave: 110 – 300GHz Basic Interactions between Electromagnetic Energy and the Earth’s Surface Incident Power reflected, ρP Reflectivity: The fractional part of the radiation, P incident radiation that is reflected by the surface. Power absorbed, αP Absorptivity: the fractional part of the = Power emitted, εP incident radiation that is absorbed by the surface. Power transmitted, τP Emissivity: The ratio of the observed flux emitted by a body or surface to that of a P= Pr + Pt + Pa blackbody under the same condition. 푃 푃 푃 푟 + 푡 + 푎 = 1 푃 푃 푃 Transmissivity: The fractional part of the ρ + τ + α =1 radiation transmitted through the medium. At thermal equilibrium, absorption and emission are the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary of the ICAO Position for ITU WRC-15 Radio
    Executive Summary of the ICAO Position for ITU WRC-15 Radio frequency spectrum is a scarce natural resource with finite capacity for which demand is constantly increasing. The requirements of civil aviation as well as other spectrum users continue to grow at a fast pace, thus creating an ever-increasing pressure to an already stretched resource. International competition between radio services obliges all spectrum users, aeronautical and non- aeronautical alike, to continually defend and justify retention of existing or addition of new frequency bands. The ICAO Position aims at protecting aeronautical frequency spectrum for all radiocommunication and radionavigation systems used for ground facilities and on board aircraft. The ICAO Position addresses all radioregulatory aspects on aeronautical matters on the agenda for the WRC-15. The items of main concern to aviation include the following: identification of additional frequency bands for the International Mobile Telecommunications (IMT). Under this agenda item, the telecommunications industry is seeking up to 1200 MHz of additional spectrum in the 300 MHz to 6 GHz range for mobile and broadband applications. It is expected that a number of aeronautical frequency bands will come under pressure for potential repurposing, especially some of the Primary Surveillance Radar (PSR) bands. Existing frequency allocations which are vital for the operation of aeronautical very small aperture terminal (VSAT) ground-ground communication networks, especially in tropical regions, are also expected to come under pressure. Due to decisions made by a previous WRC, this has already become a problematic issue in Africa. WRC-15 agenda items 1.1 and 9.1.5 refer; potential radioregulatory means to facilitate the use of non-safety satellite service frequency bands for a very safety-critical application, the command and control link for remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) in non-segregated airspace.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Satellite Technologies- ISRO Initiatives
    Advances in Satellite Technologies- ISRO Initiatives Sumitesh Sarkar Space Applications Centre (ISRO) March 27, 2019 National Workshop on Advances in Satellite Technologies National Workshop on Advances in Satellite Technologies - Mach 27, 2019 Advance Technology : Key Areas Migration from Broadcast/VSAT centric to Data-centric Payload design - HTS . Multi-beam coverage in Ku and Ka-band ensuring Frequency Reuse and enhanced Payload performance . Increased Payload Hardware – need for miniaturization . Addressing new applications like Mobile backhauling, In-Flight Connectivity etc. Special focus on unserved/underserved regions within India Use of Higher frequency bands – Ku to Ka to Q/V band . Migration to higher frequency bands – ‘User ‘ as well as ‘Feeder’ links . More interference free Spectrum . Constraints of available technologies Redefining MSS with enhanced capabilities . Multi-beam High power transponders in S-band - enabling SDMB services National Workshop on Advances in Satellite Technologies - Mach 27, 2019 2 Evolution in On-board Antenna Technology Single Circular beam Shaped Beam Multibeam(HTS) (Dual Gridded Reflector) National Workshop on Advances in Satellite Technologies - Mach 27, 2019 Technology Trends – Active Low power RF Circuits MMIC SOC 9mm X 6mm Ka-band (In test) 100mmx40mm 70mmx60mm x25mm x22mm based based MMIC die in pac. pac. MMIC Chip MMIC LTCC pac. Qualified (In BB test) 100mmx100mm x25mm Gen In production by industry nd MIC based MIC 2 RF Technologies RF 170mmx100mmx35mm MIC MIC based 200mmx180mmx100mm (2RF sec.) 1stgen. INSAT-2A to INSAT-2D INSAT-3 and 4 Series GSAT-5 GSAT-7/11 Future technologies Payload Generation National Workshop on Advances in Satellite Technologies - Mach 27, 2019 High Throughput Satellite : GSAT-11 Features: .
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-23
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-23 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Parts 2, 25 and 97 of the ) Commission's Rules with Regard to the ) ET Docket No. 98-142 Mobile-Satellite Service Above 1 GHz ) REPORT AND ORDER Adopted: January 28, 2002 Released: February 7, 2002 By the Commission: TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraph I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 1 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................... 2 III. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................. 6 IV. DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................ 11 A. NGSO MSS Feeder Uplinks at 5091-5250 MHz ........................................................................11 1. Current Use.........................................................................................................................11 2. Proposal..............................................................................................................................13 3. Comments...........................................................................................................................14 4. Decision..............................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Spectrum and the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry Prepared by Strand Consulting on Behalf of the Satellite Industry Association1
    Spectrum & the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry Spectrum and the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry Prepared by Strand Consulting on behalf of the Satellite Industry Association1 1 AT&T, a member of SIA, does not necessarily endorse all conclusions of this study. Page 1 of 75 Spectrum & the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry 1. Table of Contents 1. Table of Contents ................................................................................................ 1 2. Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 4 2.1. What the satellite industry does for the U.S. today ............................................... 4 2.2. What the satellite industry offers going forward ................................................... 4 2.3. Innovation in the satellite industry ........................................................................ 5 3. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 7 3.1. Overview .................................................................................................................. 7 3.2. Spectrum Basics ...................................................................................................... 8 3.3. Satellite Industry Segments .................................................................................... 9 3.3.1. Satellite Communications ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]