DOCSLIB.ORG

Cave Fauna Survey and Monitoring at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cave Fauna Survey and Monitoring at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri CAVE FAUNA SURVEY AND MONITORING AT FORT LEONARD WOOD, MISSOURI Submitted by: Steven J. Taylor1, Michael E. Slay2 and William C. Handel3 1Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey 1816 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 (217) 333-5702 [email protected] 2The Nature Conservancy, Ozark Highlands Office 675 North Lollar Lane, Fayetteville, AR 72701 3Center for Wildlife and Plant Ecology, Illinois Natural History Survey 1816 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 24 April 2006 Illinois Natural History Survey Center for Biodiversity Technical Report 2006(7) Prepared for Illinois State Museum Society, Attn: Steven R. Ahler Illinois State Museum Research and Collections Center 1011 E. Ash Street, Springfield IL 62703 Cover: Visitors at the entrance of Miller Cave, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. Based on photo by Steve Taylor, 20 April 2003. Executive Summary Using a variety of sampling methods (hand collections, Berlese funnel extraction, sight records, baited pitfall trapping, vacuum sampling, baited aquatic traps, quadrat sampling, and timed area searches) we recorded the presence of 155 taxa at 64 sites (primarily caves, with a few shelters and springs) at Fort Leonard Wood, a 71,000 hectare military installation in the Upper Ozark section of the Ozark Natural Division, Pulaski County, Missouri. More than 2,250 cave fauna observations over 108 site visits to these features documented the presence of more than 13,900 individual animals belonging to 89 families, 42 orders, and 13 classes of organisms. 64% of the taxa occurred at five or fewer sites, 8.4% at 25 or more sites. In addition, plant surveys were conducted around the entrances of 19 caves, recording a total of 229 plant taxa from 67 families. About 29% of the animals were accidentals, 27% trogloxenes, 23% troglophiles, and 16% troglobites. In general, diversity (H’) was higher in larger caves (i.e., cave length), which also tended to have more cavernicoles. Based on clustering of taxon presence/absence data, cave faunas were generally more similar within size classes of caves than among them. Sampling effort (number of samples) was also well-correlated with cave length, indicating that sampling effort overall was relatively uniform when adjusted for size of the caves. Using a selection of richness estimators (i.e., Chao 1, ICE, Jackknife, and Bootstrap) we were able to estimate the percentage of actual taxa occurring in the caves which we recovered during our sampling. Estimates of percent of taxa recovered ranged from just under 80% to more than 98% when all sample methods are included. Taxon accumulation curves (derived by randomly resampling the dataset 1000 times) also indicate that some taxa remain to be discovered. Evaluation of timed area searchin and pitfall trapping as potential methods of monitoring cave invertebrates in future cave monitoring at Fort Leonard Wood showed that the two techniques emphasized different dominant taxa, but that a combination of these methods would provide useful data in long-term monitoring. More taxa were associated with cave floors than with walls and ceilings, and animal scat was the most common organic substrate with which invertebrates were ii associated. Hoever, different invertebrate taxa varied considerably in microhabitat use (e.g., organic substrate associations, region of cave, humidity, temperature, inorganic substrate type [clay, bedrock, etc.]). Important invertebrate groups recorded from the caves include: orobatid and troglobitic rhagidiid mites, some spider taxa (especially troglophilic Cicurina sp.), troglobitic terrestrial trichoniscid isopods, the troglobitic millipede Tingupa pallida, the troglophilic leiodid beetle Ptomophagus sp., springtails (especially Arrhopalidae [troglobiteic] and Tomoceridae [troglophilic]), troglobitic campodeid diplurans, several families of flies (Heleomyzidae, Mycetophilidae, Sphaeroceridae, Sciaridae, and Phoridae), trogloxenic cave crickets (Rhaphidophoridae: Ceuthophilus spp.), pickerel frogs (Rana palustris), the grotto salamander Typholotriton spelaeus (a troglobite), Eastern Phoebe (Sayornis phoebe, a facultative troglophile), several bats (trogloxenes) – especially the eastern pipistrelle (Pipistrellus subflavus) and the Gray bat (Myotis grisescens) and the raccoon (Procyon lotor). Most abundant in terms of numbers of individuals were small dung flies (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae), round fungus beetles (Coleoptera: Leiodidae), and cave-adapted campodeid diplurans (Insecta: Diplura). Among the most exciting species found in Fort Leonard Wood caves are at least two (probably more) undescribed species. Diacyclops sp. is a tiny aquatic crustacean (Copepod) is new to science, and is presently being described by a taxonomic expert on this group. An undescribed new species of Campodeiidae (Insecta: Diplura) has been encountered at several of the caves, sometimes in surprisingly large numbers. Specimens of the genus Arrhopalites are tiny, cave adapted globular springtails (Insecta: Collembola: Arrhopalitidae) which are potentially new to science, and await examination by a taxonomic expert later this year. Cave adapted mites of the family Rhagididae collected from several of the caves have been sent to the taxonomic expert in the Czech Republic, where they are currently undergoing study and have the potential to be new to science. Other taxa, including spiders and springtails, are currently being shipped to various taxonomic experts and there is a possibility of finding additional new species in this material. A combination of two monitoring methods (timed area search and pitfall trapping) is recommended for future monitoring of the biota of Fort Leonard Wood caves. This study greatly increases knowledge about cave fauna at Fort Leonard Wood, and allows for more informed management of cave resources, as well as providing a baseline for any future studies. As the study is larger and more detailed than comparably intensive studies in the Ozarks, it also provides a basis for comparison within this region and across the United States. iii Table of Contents Executive Summary .........................................................................................................ii Table of Contents............................................................................................................iv List of Tables...................................................................................................................vi List of Figures.................................................................................................................vii List of Appendicies ..........................................................................................................xi Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Previous Work ............................................................................................................. 2 Objectives.................................................................................................................... 3 Methods .......................................................................................................................... 3 Site selection ............................................................................................................... 3 Field methods .............................................................................................................. 3 Qualitative faunal sampling ...................................................................................... 6 Sight records ........................................................................................................ 6 Hand collection..................................................................................................... 6 Berlese funnel extraction ...................................................................................... 6 Quantitative faunal sampling.................................................................................... 6 Baited pitfall trapping ............................................................................................ 6 Vacuum sampling ............................................................................................... 13 Baited aquatic trapping....................................................................................... 13 Quadrat sampling ............................................................................................... 13 Timed area search.............................................................................................. 16 Environmental variables and habitat characterization................................................ 17 Identification .............................................................................................................. 17 Ecological Classification of Taxa ............................................................................... 19 Qualitative floral sampling.......................................................................................... 20 Statistical analyses .................................................................................................... 20 Results .......................................................................................................................... 21 Cave Taxa ................................................................................................................. 21 Ecological Classification of Taxa...........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Examining Possible Foraging Differences in Urban and Rural Cave Cricket Populations: Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope Ratios (Δ13c, Δ15n) As Indicators of Trophic Level
    Examining possible foraging differences in urban and rural cave cricket populations: Carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios (δ13C, δ15N) as indicators of trophic level Steven J. Taylor1, Jean K. Krejca2, and Keith C. Hackley3 1Division of Biodiversity and Ecological Entomology, Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 South Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 ( [email protected] phone: 217-649-0240 ) 2Zara Environmental, LLC, Buda, TX 78610 ( [email protected] phone: 512-295-5333 ) 3Isotope Geochemistry Laboratory, Illinois State Geological Survey, 615 E Peabody Dr., Champaign, IL 61820 ( [email protected] phone: 217-244-2396 ) 30 November 2007 Illinois Natural History Survey Technical Report 2007 (59) prepared for: Attn: Dr. C. Craig Farquhar Section 6 Grant Program Coordinator, Wildlife Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas 78744 USA Cover: Cicurina varians (Araneae) in web in Surprise Sink, Bexar County, Texas. Note Pseudosinella violenta (Collembola) in lower left and fresh fecal pellets of Ceuthophilus sp. to left of center. Photo by Jean K. Krejca. Abstract The energy regime in small Texas caves differs significantly from many caves of the better studied eastern United States in that surface-foraging cave crickets (Ceuthophilus secretus and Ceuthophilus “species B”) are major contributors to these systems. The federally listed endangered cave invertebrates of Travis, Williamson, and Bexar counties, Texas, are dependent on these crickets to transport energy from the surface to the cave environment. Using stable isotope analysis in combination with in- cave counts of animal life we examined foraging differences between S. invicata and cave cricket populations in nine caves chosen based on their low, medium, and high levels of human impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Allocrangonyx Hubrichti)
    Conservation Assessment for Hubricht’s Long-Tailed Amphipod (Allocrangonyx Hubrichti) (From Gardner, 1986) USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region October 2002 Julian J. Lewis, Ph.D. J. Lewis & Associates, Biological Consulting 217 W. Carter Avenue Clarksville, IN 47129 [email protected] MARK TWAIN NATIONAL FOREST This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on Allocrangonyx hubrichti. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject community and associated taxa, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. Conservation Assessment for Hubricht’s Long-Tailed Amphipod (Allocrangonyx Hubrichti) 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................4 NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY...............................................4 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES................................................................4 LIFE HISTORY......................................................................................4 HABITAT ...............................................................................................5 DISTRIBUTION
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-Dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus Spp
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2005 The aN tural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia Michael Steven Osbourn Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Osbourn, Michael Steven, "The aN tural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia" (2005). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 735. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia. Thesis submitted to The Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Science Biological Sciences By Michael Steven Osbourn Thomas K. Pauley, Committee Chairperson Daniel K. Evans, PhD Thomas G. Jones, PhD Marshall University May 2005 Abstract The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia. Michael S. Osbourn There are over 4000 documented caves in West Virginia, potentially providing refuge and habitat for a diversity of amphibians and reptiles. Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus porphyriticus, are among the most frequently encountered amphibians in caves. Surveys of 25 caves provided expanded distribution records and insight into ecology and diet of G.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with Birds Observed Off-Campus During BIOL3400 Field Course
    Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with birds observed off-campus during BIOL3400 Field course Photo Credit: Talton Cooper Species Descriptions and Photos by students of BIOL3400 Edited by Troy A. Ladine Photo Credit: Kenneth Anding Links to Tables, Figures, and Species accounts for birds observed during May-term course or winter bird counts. Figure 1. Location of Environmental Studies Area Table. 1. Number of species and number of days observing birds during the field course from 2005 to 2016 and annual statistics. Table 2. Compilation of species observed during May 2005 - 2016 on campus and off-campus. Table 3. Number of days, by year, species have been observed on the campus of ETBU. Table 4. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during the off-campus trips. Table 5. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during a winter count of birds on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Table 6. Species observed from 1 September to 1 October 2009 on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Alphabetical Listing of Birds with authors of accounts and photographers . A Acadian Flycatcher B Anhinga B Belted Kingfisher Alder Flycatcher Bald Eagle Travis W. Sammons American Bittern Shane Kelehan Bewick's Wren Lynlea Hansen Rusty Collier Black Phoebe American Coot Leslie Fletcher Black-throated Blue Warbler Jordan Bartlett Jovana Nieto Jacob Stone American Crow Baltimore Oriole Black Vulture Zane Gruznina Pete Fitzsimmons Jeremy Alexander Darius Roberts George Plumlee Blair Brown Rachel Hastie Janae Wineland Brent Lewis American Goldfinch Barn Swallow Keely Schlabs Kathleen Santanello Katy Gifford Black-and-white Warbler Matthew Armendarez Jordan Brewer Sheridan A.
    [Show full text]
  • Corynorhinus Townsendii): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Townsend’s Big-eared Bat (Corynorhinus townsendii): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project October 25, 2006 Jeffery C. Gruver1 and Douglas A. Keinath2 with life cycle model by Dave McDonald3 and Takeshi Ise3 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 2Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Old Biochemistry Bldg, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82070 3Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, P.O. Box 3166, Laramie, WY 82071 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Gruver, J.C. and D.A. Keinath (2006, October 25). Townsend’s Big-eared Bat (Corynorhinus townsendii): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http:// www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/townsendsbigearedbat.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge the modeling expertise of Dr. Dave McDonald and Takeshi Ise, who constructed the life-cycle analysis. Additional thanks are extended to the staff of the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database for technical assistance with GIS and general support. Finally, we extend sincere thanks to Gary Patton for his editorial guidance and patience. AUTHORS’ BIOGRAPHIES Jeff Gruver, formerly with the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, is currently a Ph.D. candidate in the Biological Sciences program at the University of Calgary where he is investigating the physiological ecology of bats in northern arid climates. He has been involved in bat research for over 8 years in the Pacific Northwest, the Rocky Mountains, and the Badlands of southern Alberta. He earned a B.S. in Economics (1993) from Penn State University and an M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status and Occurrence of Black Phoebe (Sayornis Nigricans) in British Columbia
    The Status and Occurrence of Black Phoebe (Sayornis nigricans) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin. Introduction and Distribution The Black Phoebe (Sayornis nigricans) is a small passerine belonging to the tyrant-flycatcher family. The Black Phoebe occurs as a year-round resident throughout most of its range; however, its northern populations are partially migratory (Wahl et al. 2005). It is a species found throughout the year from southwestern Oregon south, through California including the Baja Peninsula (excluding the central regions of the Peninsula), east through Arizona, New Mexico, southern Colorado, west Texas, south through Mexico, Central America to Panama (excluding El Salvador) and in South America from the coastal mountains of Venezuela, through Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru, to western Bolivia and northwestern Argentina (Sibley 2000, Howell and Webb 2010, Hoyo et al. 2006). In the past couple of decades the Black Phoebe has been slowly expanding its known range northward into northern Oregon and southern Washington where it is still considered a very rare visitor, but with records increasing every year (Wahl et al. 2005, WBRC 2012). The Black Phoebe has been recorded from Idaho, Nevada, Utah, southern Oklahoma and Florida (Sibley 2000). The Black Phoebe is an accidental visitor to south-central Alaska (Gibson et al. 2013). In British Columbia this species is considered a casual visitor but Provincial records, like those of Washington State, are on the rise and the status of this species in British Columbia could change in the near future. Identification and Similar Species The Black Phoebe has a huge range that encompasses two continents.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve
    Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve Arthropods are characterized by having jointed limbs and exoskeletons. They include a diverse assortment of creatures: Insects, spiders, crustaceans (crayfish, crabs, pill bugs), centipedes and millipedes among others. Column Headings Scientific Name: The phenomenal diversity of arthropods, creates numerous difficulties in the determination of species. Positive identification is often achieved only by specialists using obscure monographs to ‘key out’ a species by examining microscopic differences in anatomy. For our purposes in this survey of the fauna, classification at a lower level of resolution still yields valuable information. For instance, knowing that ant lions belong to the Family, Myrmeleontidae, allows us to quickly look them up on the Internet and be confident we are not being fooled by a common name that may also apply to some other, unrelated something. With the Family name firmly in hand, we may explore the natural history of ant lions without needing to know exactly which species we are viewing. In some instances identification is only readily available at an even higher ranking such as Class. Millipedes are in the Class Diplopoda. There are many Orders (O) of millipedes and they are not easily differentiated so this entry is best left at the rank of Class. A great deal of taxonomic reorganization has been occurring lately with advances in DNA analysis pointing out underlying connections and differences that were previously unrealized. For this reason, all other rankings aside from Family, Genus and Species have been omitted from the interior of the tables since many of these ranks are in a state of flux.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodlice in Britain and Ireland: Distribution and Habitat Is out of Date Very Quickly, and That They Will Soon Be Writing the Second Edition
    • • • • • • I att,AZ /• •• 21 - • '11 n4I3 - • v., -hi / NT I- r Arty 1 4' I, • • I • A • • • Printed in Great Britain by Lavenham Press NERC Copyright 1985 Published in 1985 by Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Administrative Headquarters Monks Wood Experimental Station Abbots Ripton HUNTINGDON PE17 2LS ISBN 0 904282 85 6 COVER ILLUSTRATIONS Top left: Armadillidium depressum Top right: Philoscia muscorum Bottom left: Androniscus dentiger Bottom right: Porcellio scaber (2 colour forms) The photographs are reproduced by kind permission of R E Jones/Frank Lane The Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (ITE) was established in 1973, from the former Nature Conservancy's research stations and staff, joined later by the Institute of Tree Biology and the Culture Centre of Algae and Protozoa. ITE contributes to, and draws upon, the collective knowledge of the 13 sister institutes which make up the Natural Environment Research Council, spanning all the environmental sciences. The Institute studies the factors determining the structure, composition and processes of land and freshwater systems, and of individual plant and animal species. It is developing a sounder scientific basis for predicting and modelling environmental trends arising from natural or man- made change. The results of this research are available to those responsible for the protection, management and wise use of our natural resources. One quarter of ITE's work is research commissioned by customers, such as the Department of Environment, the European Economic Community, the Nature Conservancy Council and the Overseas Development Administration. The remainder is fundamental research supported by NERC. ITE's expertise is widely used by international organizations in overseas projects and programmes of research.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene-Rich X Chromosomes Implicate Intragenomic Conflict in the Evolution of Bizarre Genetic Systems
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.04.325340; this version posted October 4, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Gene-rich X chromosomes implicate intragenomic conflict in the evolution of bizarre genetic systems Noelle Anderson1, Kamil S. Jaron2, Christina N. Hodson2, Matthew B. Couger3, Jan Ševčík4, Stacy Pirro5, Laura Ross2 and Scott William Roy1,6 1Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California-Merced, Merced, CA 95343 2Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FL 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Boston MA 02115 4Faculty of Science, Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic 5Iridian Genomes, Inc., Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA 6Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94117 Abstract Haplodiploidy and paternal genome elimination (HD/PGE) are common in animals, having evolved at least two dozen times. HD/PGE typically evolves from male heterogamety (i.e., systems with X chromosomes), however why X chromosomes are important for the evolution of HD/PGE remains debated. The Haploid Viability Hypothesis argues that X chromosomes promote the evolution of male haploidy by facilitating purging recessive deleterious mutations. The Intragenomic Conflict Hypothesis instead argues that X chromosomes promote the evolution of male haploidy due to conflicts with autosomes over sex ratios and transmission. To test these hypotheses, we studied lineages that combine germline PGE with XX/X0 sex determination (gPGE+X systems).
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Residue and Residue Management Effects on Armadillidium Vulgare (Isopoda: Armadillidiidae) Populations and Soybean Stand Densities
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by K-State Research Exchange FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS Crop Residue and Residue Management Effects on Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda: Armadillidiidae) Populations and Soybean Stand Densities 1 W. A. JOHNSON, S. ALFARESS, R. J. WHITWORTH, AND B. P. MCCORNACK Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, 123 W. Waters Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506 J. Econ. Entomol. 105(5): 1629Ð1639 (2012); DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/EC12040 ABSTRACT In general, Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille) are considered nonpests of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill], but changes in soil conservation practices have shifted the pest status of this organism from an opportunistic to a perennial, early-season pest in parts of central Kansas. As a result, soybean producers that rotate with corn (Zea mays L.) under conservation tillage practices have resorted to removing excess corn residue by using controlled burns. In a 2-yr Þeld study (2009Ð2010), we demonstrated that residue removal in burned compared with unburned plots (measured as previous crop residue weights) had minimal impact on numbers of live and dead A. vulgare, soybean seedling emergence, and isopod feeding damage over time. SpeciÞcally, removal of residue by burning did not result in higher emergence rates for soybean stands or less feeding damage by A. vulgare.In a separate study, we found that number of live A. vulgare and residue weights had no consistent relationship with seedling emergence or feeding damage. Furthermore, seedling emergence was not impacted by higher numbers of A. vulgare in unburned plots, indicating that emergence in this study may have been inßuenced by factors other than A.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Salamandra Salamandra</I>
    International Journal of Speleology 46 (3) 321-329 Tampa, FL (USA) September 2017 Available online at scholarcommons.usf.edu/ijs International Journal of Speleology Off icial Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie Subterranean systems provide a suitable overwintering habitat for Salamandra salamandra Monika Balogová1*, Dušan Jelić2, Michaela Kyselová1, and Marcel Uhrin1,3 1Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University, Šrobárova 2, 041 54 Košice, Slovakia 2Croatian Institute for Biodiversity, Lipovac I., br. 7, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 3Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 1176, 165 21 Praha, Czech Republic Abstract: The fire salamander (Salamandra salamandra) has been repeatedly noted to occur in natural and artificial subterranean systems. Despite the obvious connection of this species with underground shelters, their level of dependence and importance to the species is still not fully understood. In this study, we carried out long-term monitoring based on the capture-mark- recapture method in two wintering populations aggregated in extensive underground habitats. Using the POPAN model we found the population size in a natural shelter to be more than twice that of an artificial underground shelter. Survival and recapture probabilities calculated using the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model were very constant over time, with higher survival values in males than in females and juveniles, though in terms of recapture probability, the opposite situation was recorded. In addition, survival probability obtained from Cormack-Jolly-Seber model was higher than survival from POPAN model. The observed bigger population size and the lower recapture rate in the natural cave was probably a reflection of habitat complexity.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats
    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats A agnella, Kerivoula 901 Anchieta’s Bat 814 aquilus, Glischropus 763 Aba Leaf-nosed Bat 247 aladdin, Pipistrellus pipistrellus 771 Anchieta’s Broad-faced Fruit Bat 94 aquilus, Platyrrhinus 567 Aba Roundleaf Bat 247 alascensis, Myotis lucifugus 927 Anchieta’s Pipistrelle 814 Arabian Barbastelle 861 abae, Hipposideros 247 alaschanicus, Hypsugo 810 anchietae, Plerotes 94 Arabian Horseshoe Bat 296 abae, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alashanian Pipistrelle 810 ancricola, Myotis 957 Arabian Mouse-tailed Bat 164, 170, 176 abbotti, Myotis hasseltii 970 alba, Ectophylla 466, 480, 569 Andaman Horseshoe Bat 314 Arabian Pipistrelle 810 abditum, Megaderma spasma 191 albatus, Myopterus daubentonii 663 Andaman Intermediate Horseshoe Arabian Trident Bat 229 Abo Bat 725, 832 Alberico’s Broad-nosed Bat 565 Bat 321 Arabian Trident Leaf-nosed Bat 229 Abo Butterfly Bat 725, 832 albericoi, Platyrrhinus 565 andamanensis, Rhinolophus 321 arabica, Asellia 229 abramus, Pipistrellus 777 albescens, Myotis 940 Andean Fruit Bat 547 arabicus, Hypsugo 810 abrasus, Cynomops 604, 640 albicollis, Megaerops 64 Andersen’s Bare-backed Fruit Bat 109 arabicus, Rousettus aegyptiacus 87 Abruzzi’s Wrinkle-lipped Bat 645 albipinnis, Taphozous longimanus 353 Andersen’s Flying Fox 158 arabium, Rhinopoma cystops 176 Abyssinian Horseshoe Bat 290 albiventer, Nyctimene 36, 118 Andersen’s Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arafura Large-footed Bat 969 Acerodon albiventris, Noctilio 405, 411 Andersen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 254 Arata Yellow-shouldered Bat 543 Sulawesi 134 albofuscus, Scotoecus 762 Andersen’s Little Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arata-Thomas Yellow-shouldered Talaud 134 alboguttata, Glauconycteris 833 Andersen’s Naked-backed Fruit Bat 109 Bat 543 Acerodon 134 albus, Diclidurus 339, 367 Andersen’s Roundleaf Bat 254 aratathomasi, Sturnira 543 Acerodon mackloti (see A.
    [Show full text]