DOCSLIB.ORG

The Grammaticalization of the Copula Verb Red in Tibetic Languages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Grammaticalization of the Copula Verb Red in Tibetic Languages Article * Language and Linguistics ♀⦝⃅↙Ւ⥱ ᱿⦝ᘍջ 17(5) 679–715 red © The Author(s) 2016 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1606822X16645742 lin.sagepub.com ⴳᆙߤ ㈪ⵣో῅ञણ ᢞقωऱृהٻ।ሒψאشᢀ೯ဲ redΔڇژຝ፿Ⴧ֗ࣟতຝ፿Ⴧխཏሙק፿ิխຝ፿ჇΕࣟ៲ ऄΔᆠ੡شኔᆠ೯ဲऱڶ፿խ red ׽៲ײΖمኙګݺωრᆠऱ yin ݮ۞ٻࡉൣኪრᆠΔൕۖፖ।ሒψ ೴բᆖࣔᒔ፿ऄ֏੡ᢀ೯ဲࡉچࣟত፿Ⴧऱֵႁڇլඡ࣍ 14 ׈ધऱ֮᣸ᇙΔڇωΔࠡ৵܂᧢Εګ᧢ψ Δyinم౨ऱኙפΩൣኪωشψ፿ڇژ o- ဲܗᢀ೯ဲ yin ࡉึז፿ழ៲ײ೯ဲΖፖհઌᚨऱਢΔܗ᧯ழ o ।ሒऱऴຫ፿- ဲܗឰΕ׌ᨠൎᓳऱ፿௛Δൕۖፖึܒ׌ᨠڍԱለڶࠠڼڂխΔ؁ࡳܡ࣍ش੡ᆖൄڂ ᆜࠀၞۖፖۯԱࠡזo ऱ௣ՋΔred ດዬ࠷- ဲܗᙈլඡ࣍ 14 ׈ધऱՑ፿խΔᙟထึ۟ڇΖۖم௛ઌኙ ωრᆠऱߓอ೴ܑΖृהٻݺωࡉψ۞ٻ࿇୶Աለ੡ᣤ௑ऱ।ሒψޡΔൕۖດمኙګyin ݮ ݺ۞ٻᢞᒤᡱΔقᣂ᝶ဲΚ៲፿ิ፿ߢΔᢀ೯ဲΔ፿ऄ֏Δ 1. ℨ⧄ ౨ΰ८ᣛ 1958, 1979, 1981Ι᝔ᐖဎʳפᢞࡉൣኪऱقᢀ೯ဲ।ሒڇژ፿ิ፿ߢཏሙ៲ז෼ 1982ΙDeLancey 1985ΙHaller 2000ΙBielmeier 2000ΙHongladarom 2007:17–44ΙZeisler 2000, ৰנ౨Ղথ।෼פ࿨ዌࡉڇ܀Δٵଡ፿ߢࠡᢀ೯ဲဲნݮኪլٺ2012Ι३ࣔႼ 2014αΔឈྥ ຝ៲፿ჇΕࣟতຝ៲፿Ⴧխऱᢀ೯ဲ red ࡉ yinק࣍խຝ៲፿ჇΕࣟڇژՕԫીࢤΖࠡխᐖऑ ༓ଡ៲፿Ⴧ࿪הΔۖࠡڤਢॺൄ᧩᎒ऱݮܛ࿨ዌ yin-ba-redΕyin-ni-red ࢨ yod-red ࿛ٽࠡิ֗ ;Bielmeier 2000; Zeisler 2000; Tournadre & Jiatso 2001; Kelly 2004:237–238) ܉red ऱ։ ڶ֟ ԳՑऱشHildebrandt 2004:87–89; Tournadre et al. 2008)ΖՂ૪Կଡ፿ჇԳՑ׭Ա៲፿ิ፿ߢࠌ ’᠏ᐊֱூ (Wylieئڗᢅ್ܓऄۖ໌๻ऱ৖ڗإഗ࣍ᑑᄷ஼૿៲፿شᓵ૪ຝ։֗٨ᜰࠏᢞழ஼૿៲፿݁ආ֮ء * ψ˂ωΔۖᠨিฤګ੡ vΖ៲֮ႚอᑑរฤᇆ໢িฤψăω᠏ᐊޏΔലࠡխऱϗޏଥ܂Romanization system)Δࠀฃ ψ.ωᑑشΖ᠏ᐊ஼૿፿ଃᆏ੺ૻقΞΞ।ףॵأ؁՗Δঞ؁ࠐऱנխ࣫࠷؁ψ˂˂ωΖኙ࣍ൕԫଡ९ګψăăω᠏ᐊ խ֮إՑ፿ᦰଃזଃᆏฤᇆΖ෼شᜢᓳऱՑ፿ᦰଃՈլڶଃᆏฤᇆΔ׼؆شঞլဲټڶ࿛റټ஼ټچټಖΔۖԳ Ζ֮مګլ؁ᇠق՗ছ।؁ڇழʽ࣋ٵʽᑑಖΔشආڤIPA ᑑಖΖዌᚵݮ شΔᜰࠏழঞऴ൷قψ˂˂ωࠐᑑڇIPA ࣋ ش ࢭ፞ᄐஃრ۫პ៳Θॳᙑඒ඄ਐᖄΔ׼؆তၲՕᖂ܂ᐊ֮ء࿝ृᓳ਷ࢬ൓ΖڶՑ፿፿றೈ௽ܑᎅࣔ؆Δᄗזխ෼ 墿ऱଥڶॺൄڍԱ壆נ༼ᐉᒚറ୮ٍټ໑ՓΕ૴ໃ֬۫໑ՓΕࡌਞᄇ໑ՓᐉᔹԱॣᒚࡉ፿றΖೳףࢮޥᖂೃ࣓֮ ᓰᠲ࠹ࠩতၲՕᖂॳᙑඒ඄׌਍ऱء࿝ृ૤ຂΖ׼؆Δطᇨᐱ᝔რΜ֮խլݔհ๠ᄗאૡრߠΖ᠃ኙՂ૪ஃ֖ી ᖂڣॹټۍഏ୮षᄎઝᖂഗ८ૹរറூψ៲፿ֱߢऱૹଃ֗ઌᣂᣉ৳ംᠲઔߒωΰറூᇆ 13AYY008α֗তၲՕᖂ Ζܗߢઔߒωऱᇷֱۥઝ൅ᙰԳૠ྽റூψ៲፿ൈֱߢૉե௽ ⴳᆙߤ ᖵٽ೯ဲ red ࿨ܗኙՂ૪፿Ⴧխᢀ೯ဲଫܛ֮ء೴഑ΖشᑇΔՈਢᢀ೯ဲ red ׌૞ࠌڍ࿪Օ ᧯፿ิ፿ߢ˂ֱߢΔൕဲნ೯ဲࠩழ៲ז፿ࠩ෼៲ײࠡൕޣ፿ߢ˂ֱߢΔԺቹ൶ז׾֮᣸ࡉ෼ ᢞقऄΔ֠ࠡਢᢀ೯ဲ।ሒ؁෡ݺଚኙ៲፿ݮኪף೯ဲऱᖵ׾ዝ֏૩ᇾࡉዝ᧢ᖲࠫΔൕۖܗ ࡉൣኪᒤᡱᖵ׾ዝ᧢ऱᎁᢝΖ Δലޏଥ܂ጠՂ࿑ټڇᚊႂ (1987) ऱᨠរΔۖضᓵ૪ຝ։ኙ៲፿׾ऱ։ཚΔආ౏֮۫ء ፿ழཚ (Classical TibetanΔ10–17៲ײ፿ழཚ (Old TibetanΔ7–10 ׈ધ)Εխ៲ײ፿׾ቤ։੡៲ ፿ழཚ (Modern TibetanΔ៲ז፿ழཚ (Early Modern TibetanΔ17–19 ׈ધ) ࡉ෼៲ז׈ધ)Ε२ ፿ߢऱᖵ׾։ཚຟ૿ᜯထψ፿ωࡉψ֮ωऱ࠰ᓳംᠲΔ៲፿ψߢ֮լڗ֮ڶ׈ધ)Ζ 21–18 ऄս౒׎Օၦഗ៕ઔߒΔՂ૪؁ംᠲΖᦹ࣍៲፿ᖵ׾ݮኪڼᑌ૿ᜯٵԫωऱႚอ۟վ࢏ᥛΔ ኙ៲፿ิ፿ߢऱ։ᣊΔආ౏ Tournadre֮ءᏝଖۖॺᒔࡳլฝऱΖە೶ڶᎁ੡ԯࠠאױ։ཚ ק፿ิ (Tibetic Languages) հՀΔ೴։խຝ፿Ⴧ (Central section)Ε۫៲ڇܛऱᑑᄷΔ (2013) ፿Ⴧ (North-Western section)Ε۫ຝ፿Ⴧ (Western section)Ε۫ত፿Ⴧ (South-Western section)Ε তຝ፿Ⴧ (Southern section)Εࣟত፿Ⴧ (South-Eastern section)Εࣟຝ፿Ⴧ (Eastern section) ࡉ Ζڤ፿Ⴧ (North-Eastern section) ऱ։ᣊֱקࣟ ઔߒംᠲࡉؾᑑΖร 2 ີൕᣊীᖂߡ৫ᄗ૪ᢀ೯נ༼ՀΚร 1 ີፃᓵΔڕඈڜᆏີ֮ء ፿ᇡา៲זᖵ׾֮᣸ࡉ෼ٽ౨Δࠀኙᢀ೯ဲ red ऱઔߒၞ۩ጵ૪Ζร 3 ີ࿨פऄ፿ᆠ؁ऱဲ ։࣫ޡऱψ፿ߢ൷ᤛឩཋᎅωၞ۩ေᤜΔࠀၞԫګಘᓵ red ऱ፿ऄ֏ሁஉΖร 4 ີኙ red ݮ ৵נ༼ംᠲΔࠀءഗ֮ءऱΖร 5 ີ՛࿨Δᄗ૪مኙګ૿ݮֱش፿ᆠΩ፿ڇ ۶ፖ yinڕred ਢ ᥛઔߒ๻უΖ Ւ⥱ red ᶇἄ⃾ⲩ↙⦝♀ד⋰ᘍ⦝∑Լן⥱Ւ↙ .2 ⋰ᘍ⦝∑Լן⥱Ւ↙ 2.1 ڶऱ፿ߢխ࢓࢓ٵլڇ (೯ဲ (locative–existential verbsڇژᢀ೯ဲ (copula verb) ࡉ๠ࢬΩ խ؁ڇ፿ᆠփ୲Δլ౨ڶਢছृΖ،޲ܛઔߒऱ֮ءᣤ௑ऱ೴։ΔڶΖ៲፿ࠟृٽᣊܑऱ։ ᘯ፿Ζᢀ೯ဲຑ൷׌፿ࡉ।፿Δຍጟ࿨ٽ՗ऱᓤ؁ګᘯ፿Δؘႊࡉ৵૿ऱ।፿ԫದዌ܂مᗑ ጠࠡ੡׌፿ᇖߩ፿Ζٍאዌխऱ।፿ਢᎅࣔ׌፿ࢤᔆΕणኪΕᣊ᥆ࡉ௽ᐛ࿛ൣउऱΔࢬ ނਢ be ೯ဲΔۖܛᐖ௿հ։ΖCrystal (1997, 2000:88) ׌૞ࡳᆠऱڶᢀ೯ဲऱࡳᆠኔ Hengeveld (1992:32) ࡉ Stassen ە೶ڇ (become ࿛ဲᅝ೚ᣊᢀ೯ဲࠐ઎ৱΖPustet (2003:5 ऄႈԫದ؁௽ࡳ፿ߢխፖ௽ࡳܛኙᢀ೯ဲઔߒऱഗ៕ՂΔലᢀ೯ဲࡳᆠ੡ψᢀ೯ဲ (1997:65) ٚ۶፿ᆠփ୲ωΖۖᐖᆠࡳᆠף։Δ،լ࿯ࠡ೶ፖዌທऱᘯ፿࿍፿ᏺګᅝᘯ፿ு֨ऱ፿ߢך ڇਔץbecomeΕwentΕgo ࡉ turn ࿛࿛Ո ڕԫࡳ፿ᆠփ୲ऱဲΔڶᜤᢀ׌፿ᇖߩ፿Εࠠނ Pustet ڕփΖլመᦹ࣍ຍຝ։ဲऱ௽௘ࢤΔࠡຏൄԾጠ੡ψ଱ᢀ೯ဲ (semi-copulas)ωΖ৾ ፿ᆠՂ๠࣍ᢀ೯ဲࡉኔᆠ೯ဲ (fullڇऱΔຍᣊဲנࡉ Hengeveld (1992:35–36) ࢬਐ (7–2003:5) 680 Language and Linguistics 17(5) شආ֮ءࠐ।ሒ᧯ (aspect) ऱრᆠΖਢਚش፿ᆠփ୲Δۖ׊ᝫൄൄףverb) հၴΔ׊࿯ᘯ፿ᏺ ೯ဲࠐ઎ৱΖ܂Pustet ऱ௿ᆠᢀ೯ဲࡳᆠΔۖല become ࿛ဲီ რᆠऱᓰᠲΖൕሀ፿ߢऱߡ৫ࠐ઎Δᢀ೯ဲຏൄڶᑌਢٙॺൄٵ൶ಘᢀ೯ဲऱᖵ׾ࠐᄭ pronoun) (Hengeveld 1992:237; Stassen 1997:90; Pustet) ڤݮဲזverb) ࡉ) ڤࠐ۞೯ဲݮ ዝ᧢੡ᢀ೯ဲΖ፿ऄ֏੡ᢀ೯ױٍ (ΔFrajzyngier (1986) ᝫᓵᢞԱছᆜဲ (preposition(2003:54 existence)ωᆠऱ೯) ڇژposition)ωࡉψ) ڶ।ሒψ๠ࢬ (location)ωΕψᏆڶऱ೯ဲ׌૞ဲ /ωᆠ (go/turn intoװ˂᧢ωᆠ (happen/occur)Εψسωᆠ (do/make/build)Εψ࿇܂Δ֗।ሒψဲ ழᝫಘٵ (ωᆠ (act/like) ऱ೯ဲΖHengeveld (1992:245, 253–254ۿcome/become) ࡉψ।෼˂ᣊ ፿׃፿ (Basque)Εᒱ፿ (Burmese) ࡉ۫ఄ܌ᓵԱ௠፿ (Thai)Εఄ֣ࢮ፿ (Bambara)Ε֣ཎ ࢮ׬፿ף፿ᆠᣊ೯ဲ፿ऄ֏ۖࠐऱൣउΖኙ஑ٵՂ૪լطSpanish) ࿛፿ߢխᢀ೯ဲᆖ) णኪ᧢֏ᆠ೯ဲ፿ऄ֏طNgalakan) խऱᢀ೯ဲ men ࡉՒۘࠡ፿ (Turkish) ፿խऱ olmak ࠟृ) ګ᧢৵׈ዝڇω) Ոګ᧢ᑛ፿ (Proto-Indo-European) խऱ*bhnj ( ψٱመ࿓Ոၞ۩ԱಘᓵΖ଺ࡨ ࠐऱ 1ΖՀ૿᧢ڼطਢܛ ᢀ೯ဲऱᑑಖ (Lehmann 1982:137)ΖኔᎾՂ૎፿ऱᢀ೯ဲ beۿԱᣊ ।णኪطՂ૪ᒱ፿ࡉՒۘࠡ፿࿛፿ߢԫᑌΔਢٵ ፿խऱᢀ೯ဲհԫ red៲זݺଚല઎ࠩΔ෼ ሀ፿ߢऱᣊী٥ࢤΖ്૨ (2005:41–46) ᜔࿨Աዧ៲፿խᢀ೯ဲڶ֏ᆠ೯ဲ፿ऄ֏ۖࠐΔࠠ᧢ ࢬቤהਊࠡᑑᄷ red ᥆࣍ڼڂωᣊࡉψኙωᣊԿଡࠐᄭΖګωᣊΕψڶΚψڤࠐᄭऱԿጟᑓ ಘᓵࠩ red ऱᖵ׾ࠠ᧯ࠐᄭംᠲαΖڶࠀ޲הωᣊΰլመګࡳऱψ ౨Ոਢᣊীᖂઔߒխऱૹ૞ֱפೈԱᢀ೯ဲᖵ׾ࠐᄭΔ௽ࡳ፿ߢխᢀ೯ဲ࿨ዌߓอࡉ ૎፿ऱ beΔዧ፿ऱڕԫଡݙ٤ᢀ೯ဲΔڶऱ፿ߢਢ໢ᢀ೯ဲߓอ (single copula)Δ׽ڶ૿Ζ Pustet (2003:45–53) ࢬᜰࢮ֍ሒ ڕᢀ೯ဲߓอ (multiple copula)Δڍऱ፿ߢথਢڶψਢωΔۖ ៳፿ (Spanish)Ε֣ࢮ׃ዿ፿ (Nuer)Εఄ֣ࢮ፿ (Bambara)Ε௠፿ (Thai)Ε۫ఄܘ፿ (Lakota)Ε ቼփऱ៲۫ڕ፿ߢ੡ሿᢀ೯ဲ (zero copula)Δڶᢀ೯ဲ࿨ዌΖᝫڍ፿ (Barasano) ࿛Δຟਢܘ :ਹᙤ 2008ٻቯ࿩፿ΰڕᢀ೯ဲ࿨ዌΔڍڇژՕႧ 2002:194αΖ៲ᒱ፿Ոཏሙޕ௑೷፿ΰ ˀ໑ቱዿ፿ΰᑛၺᤚࠅ 1985:43–45αΕପ੖॰؍ᚊ 2007:88–89αΕഽګ305αΕु፿ΰ႓–303 ڍ፿ิ፿ߢཏሙਢ៲ז፿ΰ്ᛎ՟ 1986:60–62αΕནᏅ፿ΰᚮᐜ㹓 2012:103–105α࿛Ζ෼֣ ᢀ೯ဲ࿨ዌΰᇡߠፃᓵଈ੄ࢬ֧֮᣸αΖ ΖอۖߢհΔፖݮٵլጐઌైڂ፿ߢࢬ࠹ᐙ᥼ٵ౨஁ฆΔլפᢀ೯ဲ፿ߢऱᢀ೯ဲڍ ᣂΖ៲፿ิ፿ߢᢀ೯ဲऱ೴ڶైڂ፿ᆠ࿛ဲټΕشࡎ৫Εྡྷរ፿سኪΕԳጠΕጊം፿௛Ε 2 ᣂΔڶైڂࡉᎁव࿛ش࿛ร (empathy hierarchy) ࿛፿ᆠΕ፿ٵΔፖԳጠΕ೯ဲ۞׌ࢤࡉᎁܑ ګ᧢९ω)Δۖسࠡለࠠ᧯ऱრᆠ (growψװ९ཚዝ᧢መ࿓խዬዬ؈ڇ Jespersen (1924:131) ᎁ੡૎፿ऱψ೯ဲ be 1 ԫᑓԫᑌωΖڤऱ೯ဲ൷।፿ऱֱڇ੡ኔޓᆠܶהࠡڍ๺ڇፖ෼ڤᢀ೯ဲणኪΖ،଺٣൷।፿ऱֱ ᎅᇩृऱ֨ؾڇΕԳΕढα࿛܃፿ߢխΔᎅᇩृߢ፿۩੡ࢬ௫֗ଡ᧯ΰݺΕڇܛ (࿛ร (empathy hierarchyٵᎁ 2 ᐙ᥼Ζ෼س౨ኙ፿ऄ࿨ዌขױࡉᎁवՂऱ࿛ร೴ܑΔۖຍጟ೴ܑ፿ऄ֏࿓৫။෡Δ။ش፿ڇژխਢլؓ࿛ऱΔ Silverstein ەऄհၴᣂএऱᓵ૪ᇡᓮ೶؁࿛รࡉٵ։ਢᢀ೯ဲ֗ࠡ࿨ዌΖᎁګ࿛ร່ࠢীऱٵ፿᧯෼ᎁ៲ז ΕKuno & Kaburaki (1977) ࡉ DeLancey (1981) ᖂृऱᓵ֮Ζ(1976) 681 ⴳᆙߤ ֮طᆖאױᢀ೯ဲ࿨ዌᝫڍᏝଖऱਢΔ៲፿ิ፿ߢڶԫࡳ஁ฆࢤΖۖ֠ࠡૹ૞ࡉڶ׊փຝᝫ ᢀ೯ဲ࿨ڍ౨ऱอԫࢤࡉ஁ฆࢤΔຍ੡൶ಘפᖵ׾ழཚ࿨ዌࡉٵ᣸ࡉֱߢऱֺለΔ࿇෼ࠡլ ᖵ׾ऱ៲ᒱ፿ࢬլ౨ֺᚵऱΖ៲፿ red ऱขڗᑇྤ֮ڍߡΔຍਢ࿪ՕီړࠎԱߜ༼ګዌऱݮ ऱூࠏΖړอԫ෼ွऱԫଡॺൄم۸ᢞᇠኙܛس 2.2 ♀⦝↙Ւ⥱ red ᶇἄ⃾ⲩ ऱ Lishiviڣ ஼࣍ 1467ګຝ։ઔߒΖڶ഑Δᖂृբچ۩౨֗ຏפᣂ࣍ red ऱ፿ᆠΕ ګΕګ੡ψݙܛgrub.pa ࣹᤩΔ אred.pa ԫဲΔ ڶگGurkhang (ዧ᤟πԭଉെρ) ԫ஼խΔ ݙ٤ᢀ೯ڶ ࠩ red༼آᇠထխࠀ܀ωհᆠ (grub ੡ॺ۞׌೯ဲΔፖ۞׌೯ဲ sgrub ઌኙ)Δפ readyψݙฅΕ א (౨ (Skyogsston Rinchen Bkrashis 2000:78)ΖCsoma de KĘrös (1834:237פऱဲ ೴៲፿چ (Ladakh) ܌౨֘ਠԱࢮሒױᢀ೯ဲऱಖሉΔຍ܂ red ڶآݙ࿨ωࣹᤩ red.paΔ׊ٍ ᢀ܂ Ա redנ፿ߢऱ௽ᐛ 3ΖJäschke (1881:535) ೈऎ᦭ Csoma de KĘrös ऱࣹᤩ؆Δ׼؆٨ิ ౨ߠ࣍ᓡ៲ֱߢࡉཎؘ༼ֱߢ (Spiti)Δ஼૿፿խ֟פ౨Δ׊ᎁ੡ᇠפ೯ဲऱ ೯ဲࡉᢀ೯ဲΖຏ۩࣍խຝࡉࣟຝ៲፿Δৰܗ .٨ԱࠟଡᆠႈΚ1 ߠΖDas (1902:1191) ੡ red ΕݙฅΖDas ᎁ੡ red ᝫߠ࣍ 15 ׈ધऱ Rnalvbyor gyi Dbangphyugګߠ࣍஼૿፿խΖ2. ݙ֟ ᜰࠏΖլመ Oiselآࠀה܀ࢮֲ֣ႚρ) խΔۏChenpo Milaraspavi Rnammgur (ዧ᤟π ऱ༓شߢխൄֱזಘᓵ஼૿፿֗෼ڇறΔޗ፿ࢮ៳ᇩ੡៲זࢮֲ֣ႚρࡉ෼ۏπא (2013:91) redΖ ڇژࢮֲ֣ႚρխۏࠩπ༼آ೯ဲࠐᄭழΔথࠀܗଡ (ᎅऄΖSaxena (1997:298Δုᆬ 18ٵլڶ୮ኔٺ፿ᄭΔ֗זڣ෼ऱ֮᣸נڰ່ ᣂ࣍ red red ፿ᄭം נਐآՈڔಖᙕΔشࢮֲ֣ႚρխࡸྤᢀ೯ဲ red ऱࠌۏ፿֮᣸π៲ײࠩխ༼ ᢀ೯ဲ֘܂ωዝ᧢ۖࠐΔࠡ܂᧢೯ဲ redψ᧢֏Εطred ԯ נᠲΖ՞ՑᅗᏕ (1998:355–360) ਐ Mkaspavi אࠀהᆺࡨߠ֮࣍᣸Δת౨ 4ΔԼն׈ધ৵פઌωۯਠऱਢՑ፿ऱ᧢֏Δ।ሒψኙွ ׈ધ 12 ڇ Dgavstonΰዧ᤟πᔃृ໛୯ρα੡ࠏᎅࣔΖDenwood (1999:273Δုᆬ 1) ᎁ੡ red ౨Ζפ౨ΔՈྤᢀ೯ဲऱפᢞق।૪ᎅᇩृီߡऱྤ܀ψ᧢֏ωऱრ৸Δڶছऱπࢸ࠰ρխ ࢮֲ֣ႚρխՈᝫۏጊംΔ׊ 15 ׈ધऱπژred ࡸ ྤڶᘓ֮᣸խࠩࢍٷࡌ❒ (2000:150) ᎁ੡ ஼૿៲፿זred ຍଡဲΖTournadre & Jiatso (2001:66–67Δုᆬ 18) ᎁ੡ red ׌૞ߠ࣍෼ ڶ޲ ژ፿խऱᢀ೯ဲ yin ࡉ៲ײࠏΔ׊խش፿հছऱ஼૿፿խ࿪֟ red ऱ៲ײߢխΔխֱז෼֗ ౨Ζפᢀ೯ဲऱ܂ڶآ೴ऱ៲፿խ red ࠀچᖂ฾ऱ៲፿Δۖᇠֱچ೴ऱௌ໔چ܌ࢮሒڇ੡ Csoma de KĘrös ਢڂ 3 ᇡߠՀ֮ร؄ີऱտฯΖ ᇞᤩ៲፿խאشࠐऱԫଡ෻ᓵΔנ༼վ៲፿፿ऄۖײٽ࿨سઌωઌኙΔਢ՞ՑᅗᏕ٣ۯ᧯ઌωࡉψ׌ۯψኙွ 4 ᣂڶኙ۞աࢨፖ۞աृ܂ψ।ሒᎅᇩृࢨᐊܛઌωۯ᧯౨Ζψ׌פشऄ–፿؁೯ဲऱܗ೯ဲ֗ԫࠄڇژᢀ೯ဲΕ ऱࠃढழڇژᣂऱড়ᨠྤृ܂ψ।ሒፖඖ૪ृࢨᐊܛઌωۯឰࡉංྒྷωΔۖψኙွܒऱԳࢨࠃढऱ׌ᨠᎁࡳΕ ࢬ೚ऱᎁࡳΕܒឰࡉංྒྷω(՞ՑᅗᏕʳ2002:241–247)Ζ 682 Language and Linguistics 17(5) ౨ (evidentialפᢞقݺω(egophoric) 5 ࡉ۞ٻ।ሒψڶ፿߷ᑌࠠ៲ז෼ۿ೯ဲ yod ࿛Ոլڇ ᎅࣔΖאղ؁൅ red ऱࠏײ٨ᜰխآଚࠀה܀function)Ζ ࢮֲ֣ۏ፿֮᣸π៲ײኙխ܀ᢀ೯ဲࢤऱ red ਢֺለ्ࡳऱΔڶᘓ֮᣸խ޲ٷݺଚᎁ੡ ्אױ܀ԫࠏΔڼऄΖឈྥႛشࠡխᛀ౉ࠩԫࠏ red ऱڇრߠΖݺଚٵred ਍լ ڶႚρխ޲ Κقࢬ؁Հࠏڕࡳ੡ᢀ೯ဲ 6Ζ (1) bla.ma-vi zhal-nas de ka-red-zer/ mkhar Ι৚-ឝਨ ቆ-஬ਨ َ ণॸ-ᛗ୆ຉ-Ͼु ࠛൌ! bcu.thog longs-nas chos ster.ba-r byas-pa.yin.pa-s Γቢ ְη-௎ឲຉ Ռݛ ๆ-Ўਨ ᇜ:ְԂ-ծ୆ຉ 7 -௎ឲຉ! bcu.thog ga.re gsungs/ Γቢ ণॸ ᇜ:ְԂ! ༆DzȈ৚ЗވήॼְΈൠ໱ݛ܁ൠᇜڿȇ৚ѽᇜ׍ๆ೤࠯ή໱ᗱݛպǫσࡹ້!! DzȠڢٴࡹ೤ኣᇜၯǫาΓቢካॼְΈൠ໱ݛǭшΓቢካӞণבǫވᇜDZȟࡹَኣ ȇȗԦ܅ЉϺ໱Ș1981:69–70Ȉ ፿ڍڜ፿Ⴧקࣟڇde ka-red ˮ߷ ୌଡˀᢀ೯ဲ˰ ፿ᆠ੡ψୌଡωΔ੡ψ׌ˀ।ˀᢀω࿨ዌΔᇠ࿨ዌ ᒔࡳऱΖאױխ red ೚ᢀ೯ဲਢ؁ΔᇠۖڂխՈਢൄߠऱΖ ω(heterophoric) ऱᄗ࢚Δࠀ׊ᎁ੡ຍृהٻݺω(egophoric) ࡉψ۞ٻψנ༼ڰ່ (Tournadre (1991:97Δုᆬ 14 5 Tournadre ٽΖጵٽܭԫֱωॺൄृהऱԫኙᄅ๬፿ rang.ngosψ۞աԫֱωࡉ gzhan ngosψشࡉ៲ගᖂृࢬࠌ ݺωຏൄࢨऴ۞ٻᄗ࢚Δψشωਢଡ፿ᆠΫ፿ृהٻݺωࡉψ۞ٻवΔψױᆬ 14), 2001, 2008) ऱ։࣫ု) 1991) ଺ঞ (anticipation rule) ࿛ۖፖรԫԳጠઌᣂΔࠡᆖᖵΕ೶ፖࢨ௫ߪਬࠃհխΔ࢓࢓ش൷ࢨၴ൷Δࢨຏመቃཚ፿ ωΕψຍڇψ෼א׌۞൳ࢤΔਢԫଡ۞ڶኙࢬ૪ࠃٙΕ۩੡Εᣂএࢨ᥆ࢤऱᒔवࢤΕᑵᢝࢤΔՈຏൄࠠڶࠠ ೚׌፿Εऴ൷ᎏڕΰۯچऄ؁՗խᖜᅝ۶ጟ؁࿯ࡳڇխ֨ (deictic centre)Δۖլጥقᇙωࡉψ۞ݺω੡೶ᑇऱਐ ڶݺωઌ֘ऱࢬ۞ٻፖՂ૪ψܛωृהٻ፿Εၴ൷ᎏ፿੷ࢨψலᏝᇖߩ፿ω(circumstantial complement)αΖψ ࡉტव (sensorial)Εංྒྷאױݺωԫֱ૿۞ٻΔψנ։࣫ࢮ៳ᇩழਐڇ (ൣݮΖTournadre & Jiatso (2001:75 ۞ٻ੡ᖞ᧯ۖፖψ܂ױழ৵૿ຍࠄᒤᡱᝫٵᢞᒤᡱࠀ٨Δقinferential)Εॺᘣव (indirect) ֗ᦫᎅ (hearsay) ࿛) ࠡՂ૪։࣫ࠃ܀ωΔृהٻࣔᒔലტवΕංྒྷΕॺᘣव֗ᦫᎅ࿛ࡳᆠ੡ψآឈྥࠀהԫଡԲ։ߓอΖګݺωዌ ԱॾஒᏆ഑ (field of knowledge) ࡉॾஒᛧ࠷ຜנ༼ࣔᒔה৸უΖࠡ৵ (Tournadre 2008:298)ΔڼኔՂբᆖᤖܶԱ உ (access to information) ೴ܑΔছृ։ personal ࡉ non-personal ࠟᣊΔ৵ृ։ sensory ࡉ inferential ࠟ ፿៲ڇωृהٻݺωࡉψ۞ٻωऱ׼ԫጟ।૪Ζψृהٻݺωࡉψ۞ٻհছψܛᣊΖpersonal ࡉ non personal ኔ ଡՀޢωृהٻݺωࡉψ۞ٻࠐ᧯෼ऱΖψڤݮٽ೯ဲࢨՂ૪ဲᣊऱิܗ೯ဲΕڇژխਢຏመԫߓ٨ᢀ೯ဲΕ խ֨ऱق।ሒ᎛ᠦਐאشᢀ೯ဲ redΔڶωຍଡᏆ഑խΔृהٻψڕऱ՗ߓอࡉრᆠΖٵࠠ᧯։੡լאױ૿ᝫ (।ሒංྒྷრᆠ (inferentialאش೯ဲ bzhagΔܗ।ሒტवრᆠ (sensory)Δאش೯ဲ songΔܗড়ᨠඖኔრᆠ (factual)Δ խ֨ऱ׌ᨠឰߢᆠΖقᎅᇩृ੡ਐאݺωΔ।ሒ۞ٻ࿛࿛Ζۖᢀ೯ဲ yin ᥆࣍ψ 153 ଄Ζݺଚؾ ሐዚΔ٥گႚಖլگࢮֲ֣ႚρΔ׽ۏගՕᖂ៲ࡳֲठπاਢխ؇ءᖕࡌ❒ (2000:62) ࠡઔߒठ 6 נՈܡᇩਢ؁ႃठΖຍٽࠧऱႚಖࡉሐዚٱठषᖕᐚ௑ठנاॹ௧Գڣ ऱਢ 1981شΔݺଚࠌءठڼߠࠩآছᑉ ౨ऱΖױࠏՈਢشࣹრࠩຍଡڶ޲س෼࣍ࡳֲठխݺଚլ൓ۖवΔٍࢨࡌ٣ ΔݺଚլᇡࣹᤩΖٵՀא࣍ႚሒழ᧯ࡉൣኪΔش೯ဲ׌૞ܗ஼૿፿խऱ 7 683 ⴳᆙߤ ࠡࢬထ Bodyig Brdarnying Tshigmdzod (2001:535Δዧڇ ගᖂृ Rnamrgyal Tshering៲ז෼ ٷωΖۖݺଚ௅ᖕኙګred.pa ԫဲΔᤩᆠ੡ψgrub.paΚਢΙݙ ڶᙕگࠢρ) խဲ֮៲ײ᤟π ᣸ࡉ១֮فᘓ८ٷཉᅇ៲ᆖ੐֮᣸Εڇ ౨ऱ redפᢀ೯ဲ܂ऄՂ؁᣸ऱᛀᔹΔ࿇෼֮זᘓழ Rnamrgyal Tshering ല red ऱრ৸հԫᤩ੡ψਢωࠀլᄷᒔΖឈ אࠏΖࢬشߠآᡪ֮᣸խຟ ωΔۖဲײࠢխऱဲؾωψຟਢ៲֮᠖ࡳᄅ፿հছऱဲءڇႃگψছߢωխᎅΔψڇृ܂ྥ ፿ႚอ፿ऄऱψtshig.phradωΰဠဲα៲ڇ (ᔾΖDmudge Bsamgtan (2005:86–87ױ౨ࠀլױຍ הംᠲऱઔߒΖլመڼխ֟ߠऱኙ܂Δຍਢݺଚࢬव៲֮፿ऄထٵխಘᓵԱ yin ࡉ red ऱլ ؘآسred ऱဲᄭംᠲΖ്૨ (2005:85) ᎁ੡៲፿ red ऱข ֗༼آՑ፿ΔՈזऱࠏ՗ਢ෼ش֧ آႛႛਢංྒྷΔࠀה܀౨ਢ፿ऄߓอᣊංऱขढΖױڶ೯ဲαဠ֏ऱ࿨࣠Δۖڕਢኔဲΰֺ ၞ۩ٚ۶ᓵᢞΖ ᎁהᐞΖەዝ֏ऱᨠរଖ൓௽ܑ܉፿ิ፿ߢխऱ։៲ڇ ׼؆ΔࣳփฯԳ (1990) ᣂ࣍ red խຝᓡ៲ࡉࣟতຝ៲፿ឩཋΔٻᇩխΔྥ৵ڍڜຝऱקᑵ࣍ 18 ׈ધࣟګ੡ red ೚ᢀ೯ဲଈ٣ ᖲࠫၞ۩ԱᚵྒྷΔᎁ੡ࠡਢኙګழኙ red ऱݮٵהऱ red ਢ፿ߢ൷ᤛ൅ࠐऱΖֱچຍࠄܛՈ ࣳփฯԳᣂ࣍ red ൷ᤛឩཋऱٵ౨ཙངΖBielmeier (2000:121Δုᆬ 32) ᢥפo ऱ- ဲܗึ ᨠរΖ ։ࣴΔڍለڇژΔᖂृսזڣᑵऱګߠΔred ऱဲᄭംᠲΔ֠ࠡਢ red ೚ᢀ೯ဲױڼط ઔߒΖred ऱψ൷ᤛءՈ౒׎ഗڂ೯ဲऱᖲࠫࡉ೯ܗ᧯ნ೯ဲ፿ऄ֏੡ᢀ೯ဲࡉழဲط red ۖ הٻݺωࡉψ۞ٻ፿ิխ࢓࢓ᝫਢ।ሒψ៲ז෼ڇឩཋᎅωՈᏁ૞ૹᄅᛀಘΖ׼؆Δᢀ೯ဲ ڇհԫ (Tournadre 2008:298)ΔۖڤᢞॾஒᏆ഑ (field of knowledge) ೴ܑऱ፿ऄݮقωຍԫृ ᢞᏆ഑ۖقωऱृהٻ፿ิ፿ߢխΔred ຏൄ᥆࣍ψ៲זᢀ೯ဲ௅੡ red ࡉ yin ᠨ։ߓอऱ෼ խ֨ (deicticقωհխࠠ᧯।ሒഗ࣍᎛ᠦਐृהٻψڇ ᢞᏆ഑Δredقݺωऱ۞ٻyin ᥆࣍ψ אݺωհխ।ሒ۞ٻψڇcentre) ऱড়ᨠီߡඖኔࡉឰߢऱ፿ᆠ (factual and assertive)Δyin ঞ ऱՈ౒׎ګ۶ݮڕਢمᢞኙقխ֨ऱ׌ᨠឰߢᆠΖred ࡉ yin ऱຍጟقรԫԳጠψݺω੡ਐ ෡ԵઔߒΖ ᇞެՂ૪ጊംΖޡല׌૞ಾኙՂ૪ംᠲၞ۩ᇡาઔߒΔቫᇢၞԫ֮ءΔۖڂ 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transfer Learning for Singlish Universal Dependencies Parsing and POS Tagging
    From Genesis to Creole language: Transfer Learning for Singlish Universal Dependencies Parsing and POS Tagging HONGMIN WANG, University of California Santa Barbara, USA JIE YANG, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore YUE ZHANG, West Lake University, Institute for Advanced Study, China Singlish can be interesting to the computational linguistics community both linguistically as a major low- resource creole based on English, and computationally for information extraction and sentiment analysis of regional social media. In our conference paper, Wang et al. [2017], we investigated part-of-speech (POS) tagging and dependency parsing for Singlish by constructing a treebank under the Universal Dependencies scheme, and successfully used neural stacking models to integrate English syntactic knowledge for boosting Singlish POS tagging and dependency parsing, achieving the state-of-the-art accuracies of 89.50% and 84.47% for Singlish POS tagging and dependency respectively. In this work, we substantially extend Wang et al. [2017] by enlarging the Singlish treebank to more than triple the size and with much more diversity in topics, as well as further exploring neural multi-task models for integrating English syntactic knowledge. Results show that the enlarged treebank has achieved significant relative error reduction of 45.8% and 15.5% on the base model, 27% and 10% on the neural multi-task model, and 21% and 15% on the neural stacking model for POS tagging and dependency parsing respectively. Moreover, the state-of-the-art Singlish POS tagging and dependency parsing accuracies have been improved to 91.16% and 85.57% respectively. We make our treebanks and models available for further research.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidaddesonora
    U N I V E R S I D A D D E S O N O R A División de Humanidades y Bellas Artes Maestría en Lingüística Nominal and Adjectival Predication in Yoreme/Mayo of Sonora and Sinaloa TESIS Que para optar por el grado de Maestra en Lingüística presenta Rosario Melina Rodríguez Villanueva 2012 Universidad de Sonora Repositorio Institucional UNISON Excepto si se seala otra cosa, la licencia del tem se describe como openAccess CONTENTS DEDICATION……………………………………………………………………….. 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………….. 5 ABBREVIATIONS………………………………………………………………….. 7 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………… 12 CHAPTER 1: The Yoreme/Mayo and their language……………………………….. 16 1.1 Ethnographic and Sociolinguistic Context………………………………………. 16 1.1.1 Geographic Location of the Yoreme/Mayo…………………………………… 16 1.1.2 Social Organization of the Yoreme/Mayo……………………………………... 20 1.1.3 Economy and Working Trades………………………………………………… 21 1.1.4 Religion and Cosmogony……………………………………………………… 22 1.2 The Yoreme/Mayo language…………………………………………………….. 23 1.2.1 Geographical location and genetic affiliation………………………………….. 23 1.2.2 Phonology……………………………………………………………………… 27 1.2.2.1 Consonants………………………………………………………………….. 27 1.2.2.2 Vowels……………………………………………………………………….. 30 1.2.3 Typological Characteristics……………………………………………………. 33 1.2.3.1 Classification………………………………………………………………… 33 1.2.3.2 Marking: head or dependent?........................................................................... 35 1.2.3.3 Word Order…………………………………………………………………. 40 1.2.3.4 Case-Marking………………………………………………………………. 43 1.3 Previous Documentation and Description of Yoreme/Mayo……………………. 48 1 CHAPTER 2: Theoretical Preliminaries…………………………………………….. 52 2.0 Introduction……………………………………………………………………… 52 2.1 Predication: Verbal and Non-verbal 53 2.1.1 Definition………………………………………………………………………. 53 2.1.2 Verbal Predication……………………………………………………………. 56 2.1.3 Non-verbal Predication………………………………………………………… 61 2.2. The Syntax of Non-verbal Predication………………………………………… 71 2.2.1 Nominal Predication………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • A Grammar of Gyeli
    A Grammar of Gyeli Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor philosophiae (Dr. phil.) eingereicht an der Kultur-, Sozial- und Bildungswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von M.A. Nadine Grimm, geb. Borchardt geboren am 28.01.1982 in Rheda-Wiedenbrück Präsident der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Prof. Dr. Jan-Hendrik Olbertz Dekanin der Kultur-, Sozial- und Bildungswissenschaftlichen Fakultät Prof. Dr. Julia von Blumenthal Gutachter: 1. 2. Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: Table of Contents List of Tables xi List of Figures xii Abbreviations xiii Acknowledgments xv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The Gyeli Language . 1 1.1.1 The Language’s Name . 2 1.1.2 Classification . 4 1.1.3 Language Contact . 9 1.1.4 Dialects . 14 1.1.5 Language Endangerment . 16 1.1.6 Special Features of Gyeli . 18 1.1.7 Previous Literature . 19 1.2 The Gyeli Speakers . 21 1.2.1 Environment . 21 1.2.2 Subsistence and Culture . 23 1.3 Methodology . 26 1.3.1 The Project . 27 1.3.2 The Construction of a Speech Community . 27 1.3.3 Data . 28 1.4 Structure of the Grammar . 30 2 Phonology 32 2.1 Consonants . 33 2.1.1 Phonemic Inventory . 34 i Nadine Grimm A Grammar of Gyeli 2.1.2 Realization Rules . 42 2.1.2.1 Labial Velars . 43 2.1.2.2 Allophones . 44 2.1.2.3 Pre-glottalization of Labial and Alveolar Stops and the Issue of Implosives . 47 2.1.2.4 Voicing and Devoicing of Stops . 51 2.1.3 Consonant Clusters .
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Zero Copulas in Hungarian Using
    Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020), pages 4802–4810 Marseille, 11–16 May 2020 c European Language Resources Association (ELRA), licensed under CC-BY-NC Much Ado About Nothing Identification of Zero Copulas in Hungarian Using an NMT Model Andrea Dömötör1;2, Zijian Gyoz˝ o˝ Yang1, Attila Novák1 1MTA-PPKE Hungarian Language Technology Research Group, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Faculty of Information Technology and Bionics Práter u. 50/a, 1083 Budapest, Hungary 2Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Egyetem u. 1, 2087 Piliscsaba, Hungary {surname.firstname}@itk.ppke.hu Abstract The research presented in this paper concerns zero copulas in Hungarian, i.e. the phenomenon that nominal predicates lack an explicit verbal copula in the default present tense 3rd person indicative case. We created a tool based on the state-of-the-art transformer architecture implemented in Marian NMT framework that can identify and mark the location of zero copulas, i.e. the position where an overt copula would appear in the non-default cases. Our primary aim was to support quantitative corpus-based linguistic research by creating a tool that can be used to compile a corpus of significant size containing examples of nominal predicates including the location of the zero copulas. We created the training corpus for our system transforming sentences containing overt copulas into ones containing zero copula labels. However, we first needed to disambiguate occurrences of the massively ambiguous verb van ‘exist/be/have’. We performed this using a rule-base classifier relying on English translations in the English-Hungarian parallel subcorpus of the OpenSubtitles corpus.
    [Show full text]
  • NWAV 46 Booklet-Oct29
    1 PROGRAM BOOKLET October 29, 2017 CONTENTS • The venue and the town • The program • Welcome to NWAV 46 • The team and the reviewers • Sponsors and Book Exhibitors • Student Travel Awards https://english.wisc.edu/nwav46/ • Abstracts o Plenaries Workshops o nwav46 o Panels o Posters and oral presentations • Best student paper and poster @nwav46 • NWAV sexual harassment policy • Participant email addresses Look, folks, this is an electronic booklet. This Table of Contents gives you clues for what to search for and we trust that’s all you need. 2 We’ll have buttons with sets of pronouns … and some with a blank space to write in your own set. 3 The venue and the town We’re assuming you’ll navigate using electronic devices, but here’s some basic info. Here’s a good campus map: http://map.wisc.edu/. The conference will be in Union South, in red below, except for Saturday talks, which will be in the Brogden Psychology Building, just across Johnson Street to the northeast on the map. There are a few places to grab a bite or a drink near Union South and the big concentration of places is on and near State Street, a pedestrian zone that runs east from Memorial Library (top right). 4 The program 5 NWAV 46 2017 Madison, WI Thursday, November 2nd, 2017 12:00 Registration – 5th Quarter Room, Union South pm-6:00 pm Industry Landmark Northwoods Agriculture 1:00- Progress in regression: Discourse analysis for Sociolinguistics and Texts as data 3:00 Statistical and practical variationists forensic speech sources for improvements to Rbrul science: Knowledge-
    [Show full text]
  • Hyman Lusoga Noun Phrase Tonology PLAR
    UC Berkeley Phonetics and Phonology Lab Annual Report (2017) Lusoga Noun Phrase Tonology Larry M. Hyman Department of Linguistics University of California, Berkeley 1. Introduction Bantu tone systems have long been known for their syntagmatic properties, including the ability of a tone to assimilate or shift over long distances. Most systems have a surface binary contrast between H(igh) and L(ow) tone, some also a downstepped H which produces a contrast between H-H and H-ꜜH.1 Given their considerable complexity, much research has focused on the tonal alternations that are produced both lexically and post-lexically. Lusoga, the language under examination in this study, is no exception. Although the closest relative to Luganda, whose tone system has been widely studied (see references in Hyman & Katamba 2010), the only two discussions of Lusoga tonology that I am aware of are Yukawa (2000) and van der Wal (2004:20-30), who outline the surface tone patterns of words in isolation, including certain verb tenses, and illustrate some of the alternations. The latter also points out certain resemblances with Luganda: “Two similarities between Luganda and Lusoga are the clear restriction against LH syllables and the maximum of one H to L pitch drop per word” (van der Wal 2004:29). In this paper I extend the tonal description, with particular attention on the relation between underlying and surface tonal representations. As I have pointed out in a number of studies, two-height tone systems are subject to more than one interpretation: First, the contrast may be either equipolent, H vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicative Clauses in Today Persian - a Typological Analysis
    Asian Social Science; Vol. 11, No. 15; 2015 ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Predicative Clauses in Today Persian - A Typological Analysis Pooneh Mostafavi1 1 Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism of Islamic republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran Correspondence: Pooneh Mostafavi, Assistant Professor in General Linguistics, Research Center of linguistics, Inscriptions, and Texts, Research Institute to Iranian Cultural Heritage and Tourism of Islamic republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran. Tel: 98-21-66-736-5867. E-mail: [email protected] Received: December 24, 2014 Accepted: February 23, 2015 Online Published: May 15, 2015 doi:10.5539/ass.v11n15p104 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n15p104 Abstract Predicative clauses in world languages encode differently. There are typological researches on this subject in other languages but none of them is on Persian. Stassen in his typological studies shows that the world languages have yielded two strategies for encoding predicative clauses. Copulative and locative/existential constructions are considered as predicative clauses. The strategies which Stassen claims are ‘share’ and ‘split’ strategies. According to Stassen some languages employ one of them and some employ both strategies. He shows in his studies, the language type can be determined by examining the said strategies in them. Using normal data, the present study examines two strategies for today Persian in order to determine its language type. The findings of the present study show that Persian could be categorized in both language types as both strategies are employed by it. Keywords: predicative clauses, copulative construction, locative/existential construction, share strategy, split strategy 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Definitive Grammar of Bengali - a Practical Study and Critique of Research on Selected Grammatical Structures
    TOWARD A DEFINITIVE GRAMMAR OF BENGALI - A PRACTICAL STUDY AND CRITIQUE OF RESEARCH ON SELECTED GRAMMATICAL STRUCTURES HANNE-RUTH THOMPSON Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD SOUTH ASIA DEPARTMENT SCHOOL OF ORIENTAL AND AFRICAN STUDIES LONDON O c t o b e r ZOO Laf ProQuest Number: 10672939 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10672939 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT This thesis is a contribution to a deeper understanding of selected Bengali grammatical structures as far as their syntactic and semantic properties are concerned. It questions traditional interpretations and takes a practical approach in the detailed investigation of actual language use. My methodology is based on the belief that clarity and inquisitiveness should take precedence over alliance to particular grammar theories and that there is still much to discover about the way the Bengali language works. Chapter 1 This chapter on non-finite verb forms discusses the occurrences and functions of Bengali non-finite verb forms and concentrates particularly on the overlap of infinitives and verbal nouns, the distinguishing features between infinitives and present participles, the semantic properties of verbal adjectives and the syntactic restrictions of perfective participles.
    [Show full text]
  • Contrastive Focus on the Null Copula in African American English
    Haverford College Senior Thesis Contrastive Focus on the Null Copula in African American English Caroline Steliotes advised by Dr. Brook Lillehaughen December 2017 Abstract In this thesis, I investigate the distribution of the null copula in African American English (AAE). Unlike previous accounts that have viewed the null copula as a purely phono- logical or syntactic phenomenon, I explore how semantic focus affects the acceptability of null copula sentences. I consider two broad categories of focus, presentational and contrastive, whose categorization has been argued for in Kiss (1998), Krifka (2008), and Gussenhoven (2007). There is a brief discussion of cross-linguistic data regarding the impact of focus on null copulas, as well as the unique impact of contrastive focus on syn- tactic structures, cross-linguistically. The core data presented in this thesis was collected through experimental research. It suggests that contrastive focus improves the accept- ability of null copula sentences in AAE, while presentational focus showed no conclusive results on the acceptability of such sentences. Based on these results, I encourage more re- search be done on the relationship between focus and null copulas, and on the similarities and differences between contrastive and presentational focus cross-linguistically. 1 Acknowledgments I would like to thank The Center for Peace and Global Studies at Haverford College for funding the research presented in this thesis, and the two consultants who graciously worked with me to generate the data. I would also like to thank my advisor Brook Lille- haugen and my second reader Patricia Irwin for their immense help on this project. Ad- ditionally, thank you to Diamond Ray and Huilei Wang for providing me feedback on drafts of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Copular Constructions in Colloquial Singaporean English
    Copular Constructions in Colloquial Singaporean English Honour School of Psychology, Philosophy, and Linguistics Paper C: Linguistic Project 2020 Candidate no. 1025395 Word count: 10,000 Contents List of abbreviations iv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Language in Singapore ......................... 2 1.1.1 Early and colonial history ................... 2 1.1.2 Independence and language policies ............. 3 1.2 Colloquial Singaporean English .................... 4 1.2.1 Evolution of CSE ........................ 4 1.2.2 Status of CSE .......................... 5 1.3 Summary ................................ 6 2 Copular Constructions in Lexical-Functional Grammar 7 2.1 LFG analyses of copular constructions ................ 8 2.1.1 Single-tier analysis ....................... 9 2.1.2 Open complement double-tier analysis ............ 12 2.1.3 Closed complement double-tier analysis ........... 15 2.2 Copular constructions in SSE ..................... 17 2.3 Copular constructions in Chinese ................... 17 2.3.1 NP predicatives in Chinese .................. 17 2.3.2 AP predicatives in Chinese .................. 18 2.3.3 PP predicatives in Chinese .................. 19 2.3.4 LFG analyses of Chinese copular constructions ....... 20 2.4 Copular constructions in Malay .................... 21 2.4.1 NP predicatives in Malay ................... 21 2.4.2 AP predicatives in Malay ................... 22 2.4.3 PP predicatives in Malay ................... 22 2.4.4 LFG analyses of Malay copular constructions ........ 23 2.5 Copular constructions in CSE ..................... 23 2.6 Summary ................................ 25 ii Contents iii 3 Distribution of Copular Constructions in CSE 27 3.1 Introduction ............................... 27 3.2 Pilot study ............................... 29 3.2.1 Participants ........................... 29 3.2.2 Task ............................... 30 3.2.3 Results and discussion ..................... 31 3.3 Main study ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Hungarian Copula Constructions in Dependency Syntax and Parsing
    Hungarian copula constructions in dependency syntax and parsing Katalin Ilona Simko´ Veronika Vincze University of Szeged University of Szeged Institute of Informatics Institute of Informatics Department of General Linguistics MTA-SZTE Hungary Research Group on Artificial Intelligence [email protected] Hungary [email protected] Abstract constructions? And if so, how can we deal with cases where the copula is not present in the sur- Copula constructions are problematic in face structure? the syntax of most languages. The paper In this paper, three different answers to these describes three different dependency syn- questions are discussed: the function head analy- tactic methods for handling copula con- sis, where function words, such as the copula, re- structions: function head, content head main the heads of the structures; the content head and complex label analysis. Furthermore, analysis, where the content words, in this case, the we also propose a POS-based approach to nominal part of the predicate, are the heads; and copula detection. We evaluate the impact the complex label analysis, where the copula re- of these approaches in computational pars- mains the head also, but the approach offers a dif- ing, in two parsing experiments for Hun- ferent solution to zero copulas. garian. First, we give a short description of Hungarian copula constructions. Second, the three depen- 1 Introduction dency syntactic frameworks are discussed in more Copula constructions show some special be- detail. Then, we describe two experiments aim- haviour in most human languages. In sentences ing to evaluate these frameworks in computational with copula constructions, the sentence’s predi- linguistics, specifically in dependency parsing for cate is not simply the main verb of the clause, Hungarian, similar to Nivre et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Copular Verbs and Copula Drop in Tundra Nenets
    Copular verbs and copula drop in Tundra Nenets Veronika Hegedűs1, Nikolett Mus1 and Balázs Surányi∗1,2 1Research Institute for Linguistics Hungarian Academy of Sciences 2Pázmány Péter Catholic University SWL8, Paris, 3–5 September 2018 1 Introduction 1.1 Background: general • Copular sentences exhibit rich and multifaceted – and in many respects still ill- understood – morphosyntactic variation across languages. Parameters of both cross- linguistic and intra-linguistic variation in copular clauses: – verbal copulas vs non-verbal copulas: e.g. English has a verbal copula (be), while Russian has a verbal copula (byt’) as well as a pronominal one (eto). – the number of different copulas within a language: e.g. English is a language with one verbal element be, while Tundra Nenets has three distinct morphological forms corresponding to English be, all of them verbal (Na-, me-, tańa-) – the distribution of copulas across copular clause types: e.g. Hungarian uses van ‘be’ in copular sentences, in existential constructions and with predicative possessives, while English uses be in copular and existential sentences (and uses have for predicative possessives). – the licensing conditions of a ‘zero copula’, i.e., the possibility of absence of an overt copula: e.g. English always has overt be in full clauses, Hungarian allows for zero copula (has “nominal sentences”) with nominal predicates in present tense indicatives with a third person subject. ∗[email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 1 1.2 Background: Tundra Nenets • Tundra Nenets is an endangered indigenous language that belongs to the Samoyedic branch of the Uralic language family.
    [Show full text]