<<

Development of Synaptic Arrays in the Inner Plexiform Layer of Neonatal Mouse

LESLIE J. FISHER The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 481 09

ABSTRACT from mice of the C57BL/6 strain were sampled at fre- quent intervals from birth to postnatal day 33 to determine the numerical den- sity of conventional and ribbon synapses within the inner plexiform layer (IPL) as a function of time. Synaptic arrays of the IPL were formed in three phases. During Phase I, from day 3 to day 10, conventional synapses were produced at a mean rate of 0.44 synapsesl1,OOO pm3/hour, but no ribbons were seen. During Phase 11, from day 11 to day 15, ribbons formed at a rate of 0.38 ribbons/1,000 pm3/hour and conventional synapses were produced at a rate of 1.15 synapsed 1,000 p.m31hour. Phase 111 began at day 15, the approximate time of open- ing in these animals, and was characterized by a sharp reduction in the rate of production of both ribbons and conventional synapses. During this phase rib- bons achieved a final mean density of 113 ribbons/1,000 prn' and conventionals achieved a final mean density of 250 synapses/1,000 fim3. Serial synapses ap- peared in Phase I1 but remained at low densities.

The retinal inner plexiform layer (IPL) is MATERIALS AND METHODS particularly suitable for quantitative analysis A colony of the inbred strain of C57BL/6 because of its precisely defined borders, its mice originally purchased from Microbio- involvement with only three presynaptic neu- logical Associates was maintained under a ronal elements, and the ability to distinguish 14-hour light, 10-hour dark cycle with food ribbon from conventional synaptic complexes. (Purina Rat Chow) and water supplied ad Ribbon synapses in the IPL are unique to bi- libitum. polar cells while symmetrical or asymmet- After random mating, pregnant females rical conventional synapses are found only were segregated and kept in separate cages in the processes of amacrine cells (Dowling with their litters. Daily inspections deter- and Boycott, '66; Raviola and Raviola, '67; mined the day of birth (day 0). Neonates of Witkovsky and Dowling, '69) or interplex- both sexes were studied. iform cells (Dowling et al., '76; Kolb and West, Unanesthetized animals were killed by cer- '77). Furthermore, serial synapses can be iden- vical dislocation at the same time of day (1300 tified as a subset of conventional synapses in 2 1 hour). were sutured with 7-0 suture which a process is simultaneously postsynap- silk at the dorsal-most aspect-which allowed tic to a conventional synapse from an ama- orientation during embedding and section- crine cell or an interplexiform cell and presyn- ing-and then excised. After hemisection and aptic to a bipolar, amacrine, interplexiform, or lentectomy the eyes were fixed in a combined ganglion cell (Dowling and Boycott, '66; fixative of 3% glutaraldehyde, 2% formalde- Dubin, '70; Kolb and West, '77).This ability to hyde, 1% acrolein and 2.5% dimethyl sulfoxide precisely identify the input and interneuronal in 0.1 M sodium cacocylate buffer at pH 7.2 for connections allows a detailed analysis to be approximately 18 hours, washed in 0.1 M made of the temporal and spatial patterns of cacodylate buffer and post-fixed in 2%osmium connectivity within the neuropil. The purpose tetroxide in the same buffer. Eyes were of this paper is to describe quantitatively the stained en bloc with 0.5% aqueous uranyl ace- temporal formation of synaptic arrays in the tate, rinsed, dehydrated through alcohols, and mouse from an undifferentiated state at birth embedded in Epon. until the prepubertal period at 33 days of age. A second set of animals (6 adults, 8 pups-

J. COMP. NEUR. (1979) 187: 359372 359 360 LESLIE J. FISHER

13 days old) were fixed by one cycle through were associated with membrane specializa- the Golgi-Kopsch procedure reported by Col- tions in the same plane of section, occasionally onnier ('64).The eyes were immersed for seven ribbons not lying near a membrane were days each in the chromate and silver nitrate found. The statistics reported below include solutions. These Golgi-stained retinas were ribbons both with and without an associated used to identify neuronal characteristics membrane specialization. In every instance which could be used to determine cell types in counts of synapses and ribbons were done the experimental retinas. using a blind procedure in which the age and Eyes were serially sectioned at 75 pm in the animal were not known until the data were horizontal plane beginning at the ventral- reduced. most point and mounted onto plastic slides. The section which passed through the optic Quantitative analysis disc was located and a portion of retina within The synapses are first defined in terms of 750 pm of the was mounted on a their numerical densities (Weibel, '69) which plastic blank for semi-thin (1 pm) and thin are expressed in numbers per 1,000 pm3. This (600-700 A) sectioning. All electron micro- statistic is the mean number of nuclei or syn- graphs were taken between 150 pm and 500 apses per unit volume of the retinal layer in pm from the optic nerve. question. Nuclei were counted and layer thicknesses Statistics of developmental interest are the were measured on semi-thin sections stained numbers of synapses or cells present at a given with methylene blue. Nuclear densities were locus at a given time, and the rate of synapse computed from data obtained by counting and formation. Retinal planimetric density and using an Abercrombie correction (Abercrom- synapses per neuron expressed as a function of bie, '46). age supply these data. Electron micrographic mosaics (final mag- Retinal planimetric density is computed by nification 26,000 X) of the entire thickness multiplying numerical density by thickness of (vitreal to scleral dimension) of IPL were con- the layer in question. The product is given in structed using micrographs of thin sections numbers per 1,000 pmLand represents the stained with both uranyl acetate and lead cit- number of synapses or nuclei contained in a rate. The average area of IPL covered by one column which has a cross-sectional area of mosaic was 900 pm2 as measured by polar 1,000 pm2and a height equal to the thickness planimetry. of the layer. The area on which these nuclei or To insure that the magnification of each synapses can be considered to be located is in mosaic was precisely known an electron mi- the plane of the layer at a level midway be- crograph of a calibration grid (Fullam No. tween the layer's boundaries with the adja- 1002) was taken each time the magnification cent layers. Planimetric densities, therefore, of the electron microscope was changed. At are the number of nuclei or synapses referred least one calibration micrograph was taken to a unit area in the plane of the retina. per session, and all were processed with the Planimetric density gives the number of syn- mosaics. Every mosaic, therefore, has a apses or nuclei which directly underlie the re- calibration micrograph to which it is directly ceptors excited by a spot of light of unit area. related. The data are also expressed as the mean Ribbon, conventional, and serial-conven- number of synapses per tional synapses were identified and the (INL) nucleus by dividing synaptic plani- lengths of their profiles were measured on the metric by nuclear planimetric density. Rates mosaics. The resulting data were reduced of ribbon and conventional synapse formation using a modified Abercrombie correction per neuron can be calculated from these sta- (Dubin, '70). Serial-conventionals were in- tistics when plotted as a function of time. cluded in the data to be presented for con- RESULTS ventionals. The criterion used to identify a conven- Golgi description tional synapse was the presence of at least To express the synaptic data as a function of three synaptic vesicles grouped next to a the number of amacrine or bipolar nuclei, a membrane specialization (fig. 1). The pres- reliable method of identifying the individual ence of the ribbon was the criterion for ribbon nuclei in the INL was needed. Accordingly, synapses (fig. 2). While most of the ribbons Golgi-stained retinas were analyzed to iden- SYNAPTIC ARRAY DEVELOPMENT IN MOUSE 361

Fig. 1 Conventional synapse from the mouse IPL (arrow). Calibration Bar = 0.5 pm

Fig. 2 Ribbon from the mouse IPL (arrow). Calibration Bar = 0.5 pm 362 LESLIE J. FISHER

Fig. 3 Muller cells of the mouse retina. In the mouse the nuclei of Muller cells form a single stratum (arrow). INL, Inner Nuclear Layer; IPL, Inner Plexiform Layer. Golgi-Kopsch stain. Calibration Bar = 10 pm.

Fig. 4 Bipolar cell (single arrow) and Muller cell (double arrow) of the mouse retina as stained by the Golgi-Kopsch method. In all of the Golgi-stained material examined, bipolar nuclei were found sclerad to the level of Muller nuclei. INL, Inner Nuclear Layer; IPL, Inner Plexiform Layer. Calibration Bar = 10 pm. SYNAPTIC ARRAY DEVELOPMENT IN MOUSE 363

Fig. 5 (single arrow) and bipolar cell (double arrow) of the mouse retina. Amacrine nuclei were always located vitread to the Muller nuclei. INL, Inner Nuclear Layer; IPL, Inner Plexiform Layer. Golgi-Kopsch stain. Calibration Bar = 10 Fm.

Fig. 6 Mouse retina. The stratum of darkly stained nuclei (arrow) corresponds to the Muller nuclei seen in the Golgi-stained material (fig. 3). OPL, ; GCL, ; INL, Inner Nuclear Layer; IPL, Inner Plexiform Layer. Methylene Blue stain. Calibration Bar = 10 pm, 364 LESLIE J. FISHER

120-

E 3 100- cn cn 80- Y -0 2 60-

-I 2 - 40-

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 AGE (days) Fig. 7 Thickness of the inner nuclear layer UNL) as a function of age. Error bars in this and all subse- quent figures represent 2 SEM. All thicknesses were measured between 200 Km and 750 Fm from the optic nerve head. Measurements were made from the border between the inner plexiform layer (IPL) and INL to the scleral margin of the INL. Care was taken to insure that the most representative sections perpendicular to the surface of the retina were used for measurement. In most cases this was determined by choosing those sections with the longest outer segment length.

- ;1.4 cn z Kw 5 1.2 an W - 0.8 \ I*Oi d 0.6

Zi I I 1 I I 1_ 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 AGE (days) Fig. 8 Numerical densities of inner nuclear layer IINL) nuclei as a function of age. Triangles represent densities of amacrine and interplexiform nuclei within the INL; circles represent similar densities of bipolar nuclei. tify bipolar, amacrine, interplexiform, and (Boycott et al., '75; Kolb and West, '77; Fisher, Muller cells and to determine criteria which '79). Accordingly, no effort was made to distin- could be used in their identification in conven- guish between amacrine and interplexiform tionally stained sections. The position of the cells in the nuclear analysis. nucleus within the INL proved to be a suffi- Figures 3-5 are light micrographs of Golgi- cient criterion for identification of nuclei as stained Muller, bipolar, and amacrine cells. bipolar or amacrine and interplexiform. In- More than 150 examples of each cell type were terplexiform cells have been seen in the mouse observed. Figure 6 shows a semi-thin section, retina (Fisher, '791, but at a very low frequen- at the same magnification, stained with cy of staining. When stained, they have been met hylene blue. reported to be at the level of amacrine nuclei Muller cells have a distinctive appearance SYNAPTIC ARRAY DEVELOPMENT IN MOUSE 365

n 1 i 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 AGE (days) Fig. 9 Planimetric density of inner nuclear layer !INL) nuclei as a function of age. Triangles represent the density of amacrine and interplexiform nuclei, circles represent the density of bipolar nuclei. These data are the product of numerical density and INL thickness at each sampled age. in Golgi-stained preparations (fig. 3) (Ramon INL thickness could easily be measured (fig. y Cajal, '72). Characteristically, the convexly 7). Between days 5 and 15, the INL thickness indented perikarya were found in the center of decreased by nearly 50% and stabilized at ap- the INL, midway between the borders of the proximately 60 pm at day 15. By day 33 an- IPL and outer plexiform layer (OPL) (see also other slight decrease in thickness occurred. Polyak, '57). In thin sections stained with The numerical densities of bipolar nuclei methylene blue dark nuclei of shape and loca- and of amacrine plus interplexiform nuclei in- tion similar to the Golgi-stained Muller nuclei creased slightly over days 12 through 21 and formed a well-defined stratum within the INL stabilized between days 21 and 33 (fig. 8). Nu- (fig. 6). These nuclei were then classified as clear planimetric density remained constant Muller cells in the semi-thin sections. for both subsets of nuclei over the same period Several different sub-types of bipolar and (fig. 9). These results indicate that there was amacrine cells were observed, but all Golgi- no net change in the number of INL neurons stained bipolar nuclei were found sclerad to at this retinal locus between days 12 and 33. the stratum of Muller nuclei, while all Golgi- In retinas less than 12 days old the bipolar stained amacrine nuclei were vitread to that and amacrine nuclei could not be reliably dis- stratum. One cell, identified as an interplex- tinguished. Nuclear counts, therefore, were iform cell, was found among the amacrine nu- started at day 12. clei (Fisher, '79). All neuronal nuclei in semi- Inner plexiform layer thickness was mea- thin sections, therefore, were classified as sured within 750 pm of the optic nerve on days either bipolar or amacrine (including inter- 3 to 33 (fig. 10). From day 5 the IPL thickness plexiform) by their position relative to the increased until day 15 after which it remained Mdller nuclei. Horizontal cells, the nuclei of constant at approximately 60 pm. which were found among the bipolar nuclei, were identified in the methylene blue stained Synaptic size distributions sections by the location and characteristics of The length of the membrane specialization the cell body. It was both larger and more associated with conventional synapses was lightly stained than the surrounding bipolars, measured as the chord of the arc formed by the and found in the most distal part of the inner presynaptic membrane (fig. 1). In some in- nuclear layer. Since the horizontal cells do not stances where the membrane specializations contribute synapses to the IPL, they were were indistinct, the width of the associated identified only to exclude them from the bipo- cluster of vesicles along the adjacent mem- lar counts and were not otherwise used in the brane defined the limits of the synapse. No analysis. synapses were seen before day 3. Thereafter, Retinal layers the mean length was roughly constant apart from the two decreases at days 8 and 13 At day 5 the inner nuclear layer consisted of (fig. 11). many undifferentiated cells. The location of Ribbons enlarged as the animals aged (fig. the OPL, however, was quite distinct and thus 12). Although ribbon length cannot be corre- 366 LESLIE J. FISHER

22- 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 AGE (days) Fig. 10 Thickness of the inner plexiform layer (IPL) as a function of age. Points here are measured at the same loci as were the points in figure 7. Measurements were taken from the border between the INL and the ganglion cell layer to the border between the IPL and INL. - m w 3000- 2800- cn 2600- CJ gg 2400- wo 'F 2200- z y 2000.; 2 0 u I I I I

oa - 1400

I I I 5 10 15 20 25 50 35 AGE (days) Fig. 12 Mean length of ribbons versus age. An average of 45 ribbons are included in each data point. lated with any known synaptic functions at Phase I (day 3 to day 10) was characterized present, this increase in size suggests a proc- oy an absence of ribbon synapses and the ap- ess of maturation. pearance of conventionals. During this time the thickness of the IPL increased to 40 pm Development of synaptic arrays (fig. 10). The numerical density of conven- The synaptic arrays developed in three tionals increased at a mean rate of 0.44 syn- phases. apses/1,000 pm3/hour and reached 85 syn- SYNAPTIC ARRAY DEVELOPMENT IN MOUSE 367 -4

I I I , I 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 AG E (days) Fig. 13 Numerical density of conventional synapses versus postnatal age. Each point after day seven rep- resents data from six animals on the average, with no point representing less than three animals. Three ani- mals were sampled on each of days zero, one, two, and five. One animal was sampled for each of the remain- ing points.

I7500 v) W v) a 2 15000

-I 4 z 12500 0

IL- 7500 >e -I-- v) z nW 5000 -V [L I- W 2500 I

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 AGE (days) Fig. 14 Planimetric density of conventional synapses versus age. These data are the product of the nu- merical density of conventional synapses and the IPL thickness at the same age. 368 LESLlE J. FISHER

2 100 z -0 I- Z W > z 0 V I 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 AGE (days) Fig. 15 Conventional synapses per amacrine or inturplexiform nucleus. These data points are the mean planimetric density of conventional synapses at each age divided by the mean nuclear density of the amwcrine plus interplexiform cells of the same age. The nuclear density is computed from a linear regression calculated by the method of least squares.

v) g 200- m- -m, aE 7

- / v) z 0 W c n -

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 AGE (days) Fig. 16 Numerical density of ribbons versus postnatal age. Each point represents data from six animals on the average, with no point representing less than three animals.

apses/1,000 pm3 by day 10 (fig. 13). Retinal plus interplexiform cell nucleus (fig. 15).Con- planimetric density increased to 3,686 syn- ventional synapses were produced at a mean apses/1,000 pm3 (fig. 14). By day 10 there rate of 0.41 synapsesinucleuslhour. Expressed were 79 conventional synapses per amacrine another way, each amacrine or interplexiform SYNAPTIC ARRAY DEVELOPMENT IN MOUSE 369

12500

10000

7500

5000

2500

Fig. 17 Planimetric density of ribbons versus age. These data are the product of the numerical density of ribbons and the inner plexiform layer (IPL) thickness at the same age. cell produced one new conventional synapse numerical density to the value of 45 ribbons/ every 146 minutes during Phase I. 1,000 pm3 on day 15 was 0.38 ribbons/1,000 Phase I1 (day 11 to day 15) was character- pm3/hour. Planimetric density of ribbons in- ized by the simultaneous rapid increase in rib- creased to 2,532 ribbons/1,000 pm' on day 15 bon and conventional synapses. The IPL con- (fig. 17). The number of ribbons increased at a tinued to increase in thickness during this mean rate of 0.41 ribbonshipolar nucleus/ phase achieving a value of 60 pm on day 15. hour to 49 ribbonshipolar nucleus on day 15 The numerical density of conventional syn- (fig. 18).Thus each bipolar cell produced one apses increased throughout this interval to new ribbon every 147 minutes. 223 synapses/1,000 @m3at day 15 (fig. 13). Phase I11 (day 15 to day 33) was charac- The rate of density increase, 1.15 synapsed terized by a sharp reduction in the rate at 1,000 pmVhour, was nearly three times great- which both ribbon and conventional synapses er than that of Phase I. Retinal planimetric were produced. During this phase each de- density of conventionals increased to 12,550 scriptive statistic reached its maximal value. per 1,000 pm' at day 15 (fig. 14) and the mean Inner plexiform layer thickness stabilized at number of conventionals per amacrine or approximately 60 fim in Phase 111. Conven- interplexiform nucleus on that day was 252 tional synapses gradually increased to a nu- (fig. 15). During Phase I1 conventionals in- merical density of 250 synapses/1,000 pm3 creased at a mean rate of 1.4 synapses per nu- (fig. 13) and a planimetric density of 14,450 cleus per hour, or one new synapse per cell synapses/1,000 pm2 (fig. 14). Each amacrine every 42 minutes. or interplexiform nucleus had a mean of 285 The first ribbons in the IPL were seen on conventional synapses in Phase I11 (fig. 15). day 11 and increased in numerical density The numerical density of ribbons fluctuated until day 14 (fig. 16). The slight drop in den- around a mean value of 113 ribbons/1,000 pm3 sity on day 15 was not statistically significant after day 16 (fig. 16).Planimetric density and (p > 0.4). The mean rate of increase in ribbon the number of ribbonshipolar nucleus also 370 LESLIE J. FISHER

AGE (days) Fig. 18 Ribbons per bipolar nucleus versus age. These data points are the mean planimetric density of ribbons, divided by the mean nuclear density of bipolars. The nuclear density is computed from a linear regression calculated by the method of least squares. fluctuated in Phase 111. The mean number of several observations by others. First, the eyes ribbons per 1,000 pm2was 6,830 (fig. 17) while are closed. Second, photoreceptor outer seg- the mean number of ribbonshipolar nucleus ments do not begin to develop until half-way was 129 over the period from day 16 to day 33 through Phase I and then only in a few recep- (fig. 18). tors (Olney, '68). Third, the bipolar dendrites The fraction of conventional synapses found have not yet invaginated the photoreceptor in serial configuration was low at all ages. terminals (Blanks et al., '74). Fourth, the bipo- None were identified before day 10 and the lar cells themselves have probably not made maximal numerical density of eight synapses/ their terminal divisions (Sidman, '61). 1,000 pm3 was achieved on day 30. The During Phase I1 both types of synapses de- planimetric densities of serial conventionals velop most rapidly. The ribbons, previously ab- remained low with a mean value of 176 syn- sent, increase in both size and number. The apses/1,000 Fm' seen from day 10 to day 33. conventionals increase in number and vary in Intersynaptic distance clearly affects the size. Interestingly, the decrease in the mean probability of intersecting a pair of conven- length of conventional synapses occurs at the tional synapses, and thus this statistic under- time of the greatest surge in their numbers, estimates the number of synapses in serial which suggests that the new synapses are configuration. Nonetheless, the values found smaller than those already in existence. The for mouse were much lower than those found size distributions (not shown here, but com- for Xenopus (Fisher, '76). puted in the process of generating fig. 11) bear this out. Mean synaptic length was reduced as DISCUSSION a result of the addition of smaller synapses to These data demonstrate the existence of the extant distribution. three rather distinct phases of development in The onset of Phase I1 is not linked to any the retinal IPL of the mouse. This discussion other obvious change in the animal's develop- will deal with each of these phases in turn and ment, but the offset is synchronous with the then close with a quantitative comparison of opening of the eyes (Fisher, unpublished this and other IPL's. data). It is tempting to infer that visual stim- The most striking aspect of Phase I is that uli at eye opening inhibited synaptogenesis; synaptogenesis occurs in the absence of any this would account for the synchrony ob- sensory input. The lack of ribbon synapses served. But, since mice reared in darkness suggests that bipolar signals do not reach the show a similar time course of both IPL de- IPL, but the possibility remains that early velopment and eye opening (Fisher, in prepa- bipolar synapses lack ribbons. Even so, the ab- ration), this explanation can be excluded. sence of sensory input may be inferred from Moreover, in rabbit pups (McArdle et al., '77) SYNAPTIC ARRAY DEVELOPMENT IN MOUSE 371

TABLE 1 far exceed ribbons in all species. Second, Comparative statistics for retinal synaptic arrays mouse and goldfish have similar numbers of ribbons or conventionals per nucleus while the Adult Adult synapses Maximal numerical or ribbons1 rate of value for Xenopus is much higher. But, the densitg nucleus formation ratio of conventionals per nucleus to ribbons (No 11,000 (So./INL (No.lnucleus1 pm3) nucleus) hour) per nucleus for goldfish and Xenopus are about equal while the same ratio for mouse is Ribbons - much lower. Third, the maximal rate of syn- Goldfish 17 18 apse formation in Xenopus is far greater than Xenopus 80 350 4.6 Mouse 113 65 0.2 in mouse (values for goldfish were not ob- Conventionals tained). Goldfish 120 140 - Cragg ('67, '72) reported the numbers of syn- Xenopus 600 2,800 8.7 apses per nucleus in cortical tissue. The values Mouse 250 143 0.7 he gives, however, are the synapses on the These data represent adult values of numerical density and of neurons in question. The present data repre- number of synapseslnucleus. To make the figures comparable. the numberlnucleus for mouse are recalculated using bipolar plus sent the mean number of synapses by the neu- amacrioe plus mterplcxiform planimetric density as the denomlna- rons. The quantitative statistics given in this tor. Maximal rates of formation are computed on the same basis. paper are the only data of this sort available, and as such, they may be useful for com- and goldfish (Fisher and Easter, '79) synap- parison with similar work elsewhere in the togenesis continues even when the retina is nervous system, or in other species. illuminated. One final point about Phase I1 concerns the ACKNOWLEDGMENTS bipolar cell. Blanks et al. ('74) has shown that I thank Sharon Burke for her invaluable the dendrites of the bipolars are invaginating technical assistance and Bonita Johnson for the photoreceptor terminals at this time. typing the manuscript. I especially appreci- Therefore, the bipolar cell is differentiating ate the suggestions and assistance given by synaptically at both ends, simultaneously. Stephen S. Easter, Jr. in the preparation of Phase I11 is characterized by no further de- the manuscript. This work was supported by velopments in the central retina. This con- Research Grant EY-01281 from the National trasts with the continued development in the Eye Institute. retinas of adult amphibians menopus laeuis [Fisher, '761 and Rana pipiens [Fisher, '721) LITERATURE CITED and fish (Carassius auratus [Fisher and Ahercrombie, M. 1946 Estimation of nuclear population Easter, '791). One salient difference between from microtome sections. Anat. Rec., 94: 239-247. Blanks, J. C., A. M. Adinolfi and R. N. Lolley 1974 Synapto- the mouse on the one hand and the fish and genesis in the photoreceptor terminal of the mouse reti- amphibians on the other is that the retinas of na. J. Comp. Neur.. 156: 81-94. the latter two continue to grow while the Boycott, B. B.,J. E. Dowling. S. K. Fisher, H. Kolb and A. M. former does not. Laties 1975 Interplexiform cells of the mammalian reti- na and their comparison with catecholamine-containing Development of the mouse retina has been retinal cells. Proc. R. SOC.Lond. B., 191: 353-368. qualitatively described by Olney ('68). The Colonnier, M. 1964 The tangential organization of the quantitative morphological approach used in visual cortex. J. Anat. (London), 98: 327-344. this report, however, is an outgrowth of the Cragg, B. G. 1967 The density of synapses and neurones pioneering work of Dowling and Boycott ('661, in the motor and visual areas of the cerebral cortex. J. Anat., 101: 639-654. who revealed the inherent simplicity of the 1972 The development of cortical synapses dur- IPL, and of Dowling ('68) and Dubin ('701, who ing starvation in the rat. Brain, 95: 143.150. examined this layer in different vertebrate Dowling, J. E. 1968 Synaptic organization of the frog species. The extra variable of ontogeny has retina: an electron micrmcopic analysis comparing the retinas of frogs and primates. Proc. R. Soc. B., 170: been explored here and in earlier reports 205-228. (Fisher, '72, '76; Fisher and Easter, '791, and it Dowling, J. E.,and B. B. Boycott 1966 Organization of the seems appropriate now to summarize and com- primate retina: electron microscopy. Proc. R. Soc. B., 166: pare these developmental studies (table 1). 80-111. Dowling, J. E., B. Ehinger and W. L. Hedden 1976 The in- Several features warrant comment. First, in terplexiform cell: a new type of retinal neuron. Invest. both numerical density and the number of Ophthalmol., 15: 916-926. synapses per nucleus, conventional synapses Dubin.~ -- ., M. W. 1970 The inner olexiform laver of the ver- 372 LESLIE J. FISHER

tebrate retina: a quantitative and comparative electron other aspects of developing mouse retina. Invest. Oph- microscopic analysis. J. Camp. Neur., 140: 479-506. thalmol., 7: 250-268. Fisher, L. J. 1972 Changes duringmaturation and meta- Polyak, S. 1957 The Vertebrate . Heinrich morphosis in the synaptic organization of the tadpole ret- Kluver, ed. U. of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois. ina inner plexiform layer. Nature, 235: 391-393. Ramon y Cajal, S. 1972 The Structure of the Retina. S. 1976 Synaptic arrays in the inner plexiform A. Thorp and M. Glickstein. translators. Charles C layer of the developing retina of Xenopus. Dev. Biol., 50: Thomas, Springfield, Illinois. 402-412. Raviola, G., and E. Raviola 1967 Light and electron micro- 1979 Interplexiform cell of the mouse retina: a scopic observations on the inner plexiform layer of the Golgi demonstration. Invest. Ophthalmol., 18: 521-523. rabbit retina. Am. J. Anat., 120: 403-426. Fisher, L. J., and S. S. Easter, Jr. 1979 Retinal synaptic Sidmsn, R. L. 1961 Histogenesis of Mouse Retina Stud- arrays: continuing development in the adult goldfish. J. ied with Thymidine-H3. G. K. Smelser, ed. Academic Comp. Neur., 185: 373-380. Press, New York. Kolb, H., and R. W. West 1977 Synaptic connections of the Weibel, E. R. 1969 Stereological principles for morpho- interplexiform cell in the retina of the cat. J. Neurocytol., metry in electron microscopic cytology. Int. Rev. Cytol., 6: 155-170. 26: 235-302. McArdle, C. B., J. E. Dowling and R. H. Masland 1977 De- West, R. W. 1972 Thick sections of Epon. Stain Technol., velopment of outer segments and synapses in the rabbit 47: 201. retina. J. Comp. Neur., 175: 253-274. Witkovsky, P., and J. E. Dowling 1969 Synaptic relation- Olney, J. W. 1968 An electron microscopic study of syn- ships in the plexiform layers of carp retina. Z. Zellforsch., apse formation, receptor outer segment development, and 100; 60-82.