DOCSLIB.ORG

THE PENTATEUCHAL TARGUMS: a REDACTION HISTORY and GENESIS 1: 26-27 in the EXEGETICAL CONTEXT of FORMATIVE JUDAISM by GUDRUN EL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE PENTATEUCHAL TARGUMS: a REDACTION HISTORY and GENESIS 1: 26-27 in the EXEGETICAL CONTEXT of FORMATIVE JUDAISM by GUDRUN EL THE PENTATEUCHAL TARGUMS: A REDACTION HISTORY AND GENESIS 1: 26-27 IN THE EXEGETICAL CONTEXT OF FORMATIVE JUDAISM by GUDRUN ELISABETH LIER THESIS Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR LITTERARUM ET PHILOSOPHIAE in SEMITIC LANGUAGES AND CULTURES in the FACULTY OF HUMANITIES at the UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG PROMOTER: PROF. J.F. JANSE VAN RENSBURG APRIL 2008 ABSTRACT THE PENTATEUCHAL TARGUMS: A REDACTION HISTORY AND GENESIS 1: 26-27 IN THE EXEGETICAL CONTEXT OF FORMATIVE JUDAISM This thesis combines Targum studies with Judaic studies. First, secondary sources were examined and independent research was done to ascertain the historical process that took place in the compilation of extant Pentateuchal Targums (Fragment Targum [Recension P, MS Paris 110], Neofiti 1, Onqelos and Pseudo-Jonathan). Second, a framework for evaluating Jewish exegetical practices within the age of formative Judaism was established with the scrutiny of midrashic texts on Genesis 1: 26-27. Third, individual targumic renderings of Genesis 1: 26-27 were compared with the Hebrew Masoretic text and each other and then juxtaposed with midrashic literature dating from the age of formative Judaism. Last, the outcome of the second and third step was correlated with findings regarding the historical process that took place in the compilation of the Targums, as established in step one. The findings of the summative stage were also juxtaposed with the linguistic characterizations of the Comprehensive Aramaic Lexicon Project (CAL) of Michael Sokoloff and his colleagues. The thesis can report the following findings: (1) Within the age of formative Judaism pharisaic sages and priest sages assimilated into a new group of Jewish leadership known as ‘rabbis’. Under the direction of these scholars, Pentateuchal Targums were collectively and purposefully redacted for use in liturgical, educational ABSTRACT or halakhic contexts. This finding counters the alternative view that priestly groups remained distinct from rabbinic circles until the fourth century C.E. and that priests alone were responsible for the compilation of Targum Pseudo-Jonathan. (2) The analysis of midrashic literature revealed different modes of exegesis used by Tannaim and Amoraim, thus providing information on the time and context wherein midrashic passages were compiled. When midrashic passages were then juxtaposed with individual renderings of Genesis 1: 26-27, it became possible to obtain more specific information on the dating and purpose for which extant Pentateuchal Targums were compiled. (3) The comparison of targumic renderings of Genesis 1: 26-27 with the Hebrew Masoretic Text and each other challenges the assumption that all extant Targums were compiled for the Synagogue. In Fragment Targum and Neofiti 1, haggadic rendering goes together with the popular Aramaic dialect used in Synagogue services, while the use of Standard Literary Aramaic employed in the context of halakhic decision-making characterizes the literal rendering of Targum Onqelos. The use of different dialects in Targum Pseudo-Jonathan (PJ) in conjunction with an expansive rendering of Genesis 1: 26-27, which concurs with rhetorical arguments of Palestinian Amoraim in the Palestinian Talmud and Genesis Rabbah, may be an indication that PJ was used for educational purposes. CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT CONTENTS i ABBREVIATIONS vi LABELS USED IN THE THESIS xii ELECTRONIC TEXTS xvii TRANSLITERATION OF CONSONANTS xix CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Aramaic Dialects 18 1.2 Discussion of Selected Primary and Secondary Sources 20 1.3 Terminology and Methodology 21 1.4 Motivation for Chapters 2-8 24 CHAPTER 2 A HISTORICAL CONTEXT FOR PENTATEUCHAL 27 TARGUMS 2.1 ‘Targum’ as Defined by Scholars 30 2.2 Categories of Pentateuchal Targums 31 2.3 Theories Concerning Oral and Written Targums 32 2.4 The Impact of the Destruction of the Second Temple on 42 Judaism 2.4.1 The standardization of the Synagogue liturgy 42 2.4.1.1 The exigency for standardization 43 i 2.4.1.2 Synagogue functions before and after the Destruction 44 2.4.2 The ‘house of study’ after the Destruction 47 2.4.3 The emergence of an innovative new leadership 48 2.4.3.1 The increasing influence of pharisaic sages 49 2.4.4 The term ‘rabbi’ as title 58 2.4.4.1 Different rabbinic titles 60 2.4.5 Who provided the leadership in Palestinian Synagogues? 60 2.4.5.1 Different leaders in post-Temple Synagogues in Palestine 62 2.4.6 Two forms of study 67 2.4.6.1 Two religious groupings: strict and lenient 68 2.5 Pentateuchal Targums: Different Dialects Dissimilar 72 Designs 2.5.1 The use of Aramaic Bible translations 72 2.5.2 The prohibition on writing 73 2.5.3 Fixed authorized Aramaic renditions 76 2.5.3.1 Targumic rendering in the Synagogue 77 2.5.3.2 The meturgeman 79 2.5.3.3 Liturgical and scholarly Targums 83 2.5.4 The function of Proto-O 85 2.5.5 A proposed theory of standardized liturgical Targums 87 2.5.6 The case for academic Targums 89 2.6 Summative: The Relation between Targums and Rabbinic 91 Academies CHAPTER 3 THE HISTORICAL ROOTS OF TARGUMIC 95 ii INTERPRETATION OF GENESIS 1: 26-27 CHAPTER 4 A MIDRASHIC FRAMEWORK FOR RENDERINGS OF 106 GENESIS 1: 26-27 4.1 The Concept of God’s Unity and Uniqueness 116 4.2 Midrash Defined in Correspondence with Gen. 1: 26-27 117 4.3 A Systematic Analysis of Gen. 1: 26-27 in Midrashim 119 4.3.1 Gen. 1: 26-27 in Mek. Pischa 14 and GenR 8: 11 120 4.3.2 Gen. 1: 26-27 and the identification of polytheistic exegeses 130 141 דמות Gen. 1: 26-27 and the aspect of 4.3.3 4.4 Midrashic Exegeses of Gen 1: 26-27: A Comparative 154 Summary CHAPTER 5 GENESIS 1: 26-27 ACCORDING TO FRAGMENT 159 TARGUM (RECENSION P, MS PARIS 110) AND NEOFITI 1 5.1 Current Scholarly Views on FragTarg (Recension P, MS 159 Paris 110) and Neofiti 1 5.2 The Theological Emphasis of Liturgical Targums 160 5.3 FragTarg (Recension P, MS Paris 110) 162 5.3.1 Conclusive Remarks on FragTarg 174 5.4 Neofiti 1 174 5.4.1 Neofiti’s rendering of Gen. 1: 26-27 178 5.4.1.1 Gen. 1: 26 179 iii 5.4.1.2 Gen. 1: 27 187 5.5 Conclusive Remarks on FragTarg and N 189 CHAPTER 6 TARGUM ONQELOS AND GENESIS 1: 26-27 191 6.1 TO and the Rendering of Gen. 1: 26-27 192 6.2 Exegetical and Historical Relationships in TO 222 CHAPTER 7 PSEUDO-JONATHAN AND THE RENDERING OF 225 GENESIS 1: 26-27 7.1 PJ’s Composite Arrangement 226 7.1.1 Different layers in PJ 226 7.1.2 Dialectical differences in PJ 228 7.2 The Integrated Character of PJ 231 7.3 Rabbinic Learning in Formative Judaism and PJ 234 7.4 Gen. 1: 26-27 in PJ 241 7.4.1 Gen. 1: 26 in PJ 244 7.4.1.1 Gen. 1: 26 in PJ and midrashic traditions 244 7.4.2 Gen. 1: 27 in PJ 251 7.4.2.1 Gen. 1: 27 in PJ and midrashic traditions 253 7.5 Exegetical and Historical Relationships in PJ Gen. 1: 26- 262 27 7.6 The Problem of Priestly Entitlements in PJ 265 7.7 Conclusive Remarks in Matters of PJ Gen. 1: 26-27 269 iv CHAPTER 8 SUMMARY AND GENERAL CONCLUSIONS 274 BIBLIOGRAPHY BOOKS, ARTICLES AND BOOK REVIEWS 283 APPENDIX 306 v ABBREVIATIONS General observations Full stops are retained for initials in personal names: G.E. Lier (without a space between the G. and the E.). Spaces are retained after any abbreviation which is followed by a full stop: p. 43. p. and pp. as abbreviations for ‘page(s)’ are avoided except where there is real danger of confusion. Full stops are omitted in contractions (i.e. where the last letter of the word is retained), e.g. Dr, St, eds, vols, including contractions of titles of biblical books. Otherwise a final full stop is included. Abbreviations end with a full stop only if the abbreviation ends with a letter other than the last letter of the name. General abbreviations follow the Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (6th edition). The following are used: c. (circa), ed./eds (edition/editions), fn. (footnote), frg./frgs (fragment/fragments), n.d. (no date of publication), n.p. (no place of publication), n.s. (new series), o.s. (old series), vol./vols (volume/volumes) , cf. (compare), e.g. (for example), ff. (following further), i.e. (that is), cent. (century). The terms i.e. and e.g. are not followed by a comma. Abbreviations of journal titles and well-known encyclopaedias, etc. use the commonly used abbreviations, but are not abbreviated in the bibliography. vi Abbreviations in ancient sources Names of biblical books are abbreviated when both chapter and verse are given, otherwise not: Gen. 1: 26, Genesis 1, Genesis 1-6. Biblical abbreviations Gen., Exod., Lev., Num., Deut., Josh., Judg., Ruth, 1 Sam., 2 Sam., 1 Kgs, 2 Kgs, 1 Chron., 2 Chron., Ezra, Neh., Esth., Job, Ps./Pss, Prov., Eccl., Song, Isa., Jer., Lam., Ezek., Dan., Hos., Joel, Amos, Obad., Jon., Mic., Nah., Hab., Zeph., Hag., Zech., Mal., Matt., Mark, Luke, John, Acts, Rom., 1 Cor., 2 Cor., Gal., Eph., Phil., Col., 1 Thess., 2 Thess., 1 Tim., 2 Tim., Tit., Phlm., Heb., Jas, 1 Pet., 2 Pet., 1 John, 2 John, 3 John, Jude, Rev. Josephus Antiq. = Antiquities of the Jews War = The Wars of the Jews Life = The Life of Flavious Josephus Apion = Against Apion Specific abbreviations Abbreviations which consist of sets of initials (JSS), no full stops are used.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On Changing the Immutable by Marc B. Shapiro,The History and Dating
    וְהָאֱמֶת וְהַשָּׁלוֹם On Changing the ;אֱהָבוּ Immutable by Marc B. Shapiro On Changing the Immutable by ;וְהָאֱמֶת וְהַשָּׁלוֹם אֱהָבוּ Marc B. Shapiro By Yitzchok Stroh Professor Marc Shapiro’s latest work, Changing the Immutable, contains considerable interesting and pertinent information for the student of Jewish history. As stated on the cover, the author attempts to reveal how the (Jewish) orthodox ‘establishment’ silences both past and present dissenting voices through “Orthodox Judaism Rewriting Its History.” I don’t intend this to be a review of the entire work (that would take a lot more time and space), however I did want to share some of my frustration here, because I sense that the author’s bias affected his objectivity, and I am afraid that many a reader will be left with an impression that in many ways does not reflect the reality of this complex topic. In this article, I would like to examine one passage of Shapiro’s work to illustrate this point. In chapter eight, entitled, “Is the truth really that important?” Shapiro writes: Because my purpose in this chapter is to chart the outer limits of what has been viewed as acceptable when it comes to falsehood and deception. I will be focusing on the more ‘liberal’ positions. My aim is to show just how far some rabbinic decisors were willing to go in sanctioning deviations from the truth. One must bear in mind, however, that there are often views in opposition to the ones I shall be examining. Perhaps this knowledge can serve as a counterweight to the shock that many readers will experience upon learning of some of the positions I will mention.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Jews, Gentiles, and the Modern Egalitarian Ethos
    Jews, Gentiles, and the Modern Egalitarian Ethos: Some Tentative Thoughts David Berger The deep and systemic tension between contemporary egalitarianism and many authoritative Jewish texts about gentiles takes varying forms. Most Orthodox Jews remain untroubled by some aspects of this tension, understanding that Judaism’s affirmation of chosenness and hierarchy can inspire and ennoble without denigrating others. In other instances, affirmations of metaphysical differences between Jews and gentiles can take a form that makes many of us uncomfortable, but we have the legitimate option of regarding them as non-authoritative. Finally and most disturbing, there are positions affirmed by standard halakhic sources from the Talmud to the Shulhan Arukh that apparently stand in stark contrast to values taken for granted in the modern West and taught in other sections of the Torah itself. Let me begin with a few brief observations about the first two categories and proceed to somewhat more extended ruminations about the third. Critics ranging from medieval Christians to Mordecai Kaplan have directed withering fire at the doctrine of the chosenness of Israel. Nonetheless, if we examine an overarching pattern in the earliest chapters of the Torah, we discover, I believe, that this choice emerges in a universalist context. The famous statement in the Mishnah (Sanhedrin 4:5) that Adam was created singly so that no one would be able to say, “My father is greater than yours” underscores the universality of the original divine intent. While we can never know the purpose of creation, one plausible objective in light of the narrative in Genesis is the opportunity to actualize the values of justice and lovingkindness through the behavior of creatures who subordinate themselves to the will 1 of God.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust & Catastrophe
    Volume VI, Issue 6 Lag ba-Omer April 28, 2013 18 Iyyar 5773 Kol Hamevaser The Jewish Thought Magazine of the Yeshiva University Student Body Responses to Technology Issue, p. 3-5 The Presence of Narrative and the Poland Trip Holocaust & Gavriel Brown, p. 6 The Wartime Activites of R. Catastrophe Barukh Rabinowicz Akiva Weisinger, p. 7 A Late Twentieth-Century Pogrom, Made in the USA: What We Talk About When We Talk About the Crown Heights Riot Chesky Kopel, p. 10 An Interview with Simon Goldberg, p. 15 Eliezer Berkovits’ Post- Holocaust Theology Yoni Zisook, p. 16 “Nose be-Ol Im Havero”: A Burden Worth Carrying Mordechai Shichtman, p. 19 Creative Arts Section p. 21-23 www.kolhamevaser.com EDITORS-IN-CHIEF 1 & CATASTROPHE HOLOCAUST Gabrielle Hiller Kol Hamevaser Holocaust & Catastrophe The Jewish Thought Magazine of Editors’ Thoughts: “A Time to Mourn and a Time to Dance” Chesky Kopel By: Gabrielle Hiller the Yeshiva University Student Body On April 7, 1959, the Knesset of the wished us to envision. The twenty-seventh celebrate on Lag ba-Omer, when the deaths grapple with the depths of our history, but ASSOCIATE EDITORS How Long Will You Limp Between Opinions?: On the Difference Between the State of Israel passed a law establishing of Nissan approximates the anniversary ceased. On Yom ha-Zikaron, we remember also fathom the heights to which we have Adam Friedmann Academy and the Yeshivah 3 the twenty-seventh of Nissan as the day on of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising,4 an event the soldiers who gave their lives to protect risen.
    [Show full text]
  • Torah in Triclinia: the Rabbinic Banquet and the Significance of Architecture
    Theological Studies Faculty Works Theological Studies 2012 Torah in triclinia: the Rabbinic Banquet and the Significance of Architecture Gil P. Klein Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/theo_fac Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Klein, Gil P. "Torah in Triclinia: The Rabbinic Banquet and the Significance of Architecture." Jewish Quarterly Review, vol. 102 no. 3, 2012, p. 325-370. doi:10.1353/jqr.2012.0024. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Theological Studies at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theological Studies Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. T HE J EWISH Q UARTERLY R EVIEW, Vol. 102, No. 3 (Summer 2012) 325–370 Torah in Triclinia: The Rabbinic Banquet and the Significance of Architecture GIL P. KLEIN INASATIRICALMOMENTin Plato’s Symposium (175a), Socrates, who ARTICLES is expected at the banquet, disappears, only to be found lost in thought on the porch of a neighboring house. Similarly, in the Palestinian Talmud (yBer 5.1, 9a), Resh Lakish appears so immersed in thought about the Torah that he unintentionally crosses the city’s Sabbath boundary. This shared trope of the wise man whose introspection leads to spatial disori- entation is not surprising.1 Different as the Platonic philosopher may be
    [Show full text]
  • German Jews in the United States: a Guide to Archival Collections
    GERMAN HISTORICAL INSTITUTE,WASHINGTON,DC REFERENCE GUIDE 24 GERMAN JEWS IN THE UNITED STATES: AGUIDE TO ARCHIVAL COLLECTIONS Contents INTRODUCTION &ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1 ABOUT THE EDITOR 6 ARCHIVAL COLLECTIONS (arranged alphabetically by state and then city) ALABAMA Montgomery 1. Alabama Department of Archives and History ................................ 7 ARIZONA Phoenix 2. Arizona Jewish Historical Society ........................................................ 8 ARKANSAS Little Rock 3. Arkansas History Commission and State Archives .......................... 9 CALIFORNIA Berkeley 4. University of California, Berkeley: Bancroft Library, Archives .................................................................................................. 10 5. Judah L. Mages Museum: Western Jewish History Center ........... 14 Beverly Hills 6. Acad. of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences: Margaret Herrick Library, Special Coll. ............................................................................ 16 Davis 7. University of California at Davis: Shields Library, Special Collections and Archives ..................................................................... 16 Long Beach 8. California State Library, Long Beach: Special Collections ............. 17 Los Angeles 9. John F. Kennedy Memorial Library: Special Collections ...............18 10. UCLA Film and Television Archive .................................................. 18 11. USC: Doheny Memorial Library, Lion Feuchtwanger Archive ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Laws of Shabbat
    Shabbat: The Jewish Day of Rest, Rules & Cholent Meaningful Jewish Living January 9, 2020 Rabbi Elie Weinstock I) The beauty of Shabbat & its essential function 1. Ramban (Nachmanides) – Shemot 20:8 It is a mitzvah to constantly remember Shabbat each and every day so that we do not forget it nor mix it up with any other day. Through its remembrance we shall always be conscious of the act of Creation, at all times, and acknowledge that the world has a Creator . This is a central foundation in belief in God. 2. The Shabbat, Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan, NCSY, NY, 1974, p. 12 a – (אומן) It comes from the same root as uman .(אמונה) The Hebrew word for faith is emunah craftsman. Faith cannot be separated from action. But, by what act in particular do we demonstrate our belief in God as Creator? The one ritual act that does this is the observance of the Shabbat. II) Zachor v’shamor – Remember and Safeguard – Two sides of the same coin שמות כ:ח - זָכֹוראֶ ת יֹום הַשַבָתלְקַדְ ׁשֹו... Exodus 20:8 Remember the day of Shabbat to make it holy. Deuteronomy 5:12 דברים ה:יב - ׁשָמֹוראֶ ת יֹום הַשַבָתלְקַדְ ׁשֹו... Safeguard the day of Shabbat to make it holy. III) The Soul of the Day 1. Talmud Beitzah 16a Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish said, “The Holy One, Blessed be He, gave man an additional soul on the eve of Shabbat, and at the end of Shabbat He takes it back.” 2 Rashi “An additional soul” – a greater ability for rest and joy, and the added capacity to eat and drink more.
    [Show full text]
  • Philo Ng.Pdf
    PHILO AND THE NAMES OF GOD By A. MARMORSTEIN,Jews College, London IN A recent work on the allegorical exegesis of Philo of Alexandria' Philo's views and teachings as to the Hebrew names of God are once more discussed and analyzed. The author repeats and shares the old opinion, elaborated and propagated by Zacharias Frankel and others that Philo was more or less ignorant of the Hebrew tongue. Philo's treat- ment of the divine names is put in the first line of witnesses to corroborate this literary verdict. This question touches wider and more important problems than the narrow ques- tion whether Philo knew Hebrew, or not,2 and if the former is the case how far his knowledge, and if the latter is true how far his ignorance went. For the theologians generally some important historical and theological problems, for Jewish theology especially, besides these, literary and relig- ious questions as to the date and origin of religious concep- tions, and the antiquity and value of our sources are involved. Philo is criticized for having no idea2 of the equivalent names used by the LXX for the Tetragrammaton and Elohim respectively. The former is translated KVptOS, the latter 4hos. This omission is the more serious since the distinction between these two names is one of Philo's chief doctrines. We are referred to a remark made by Z. Frankel about ' Edmund Stein, Die allegorische Exegese des Philo aus Alexandreia; Giessen, 1929. (Beihefte Zur ZAW. No. 51.) 2 Ibid., p. 20, for earlier observations see G. Dalman, Adonaj, 59.1, Daehne, Geschichtliche Darstellung, I 231, II 51; Freiidenthal, Alexander Polyhistor, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisdom, Israel and Other Nations Perspectives from the Hebrew Bible, Deuterocanonical Literature, and the Dead Sea Scrolls
    Wisdom, Israel and Other Nations Perspectives from the Hebrew Bible, Deuterocanonical Literature, and the Dead Sea Scrolls Marko Marttila (University of Helsinki) and Mika S. Pajunen (University of Helsinki)1 “Wisdom” is a central concept in the Hebrew Bible and Early Jewish literature. An analysis of a selection of texts from the Second Temple period reveals that the way wisdom and its possession were understood changed gradually in a more exclusive direction. Deuteronomy 4 speaks of Israel as a wise people, whose wisdom is based on the diligent observance of the Torah. Prov- erbs 8 introduces personified Lady Wisdom that is at first a rather universal figure, but in later sources becomes more firmly a property of Israel.Ben Sira (Sir. 24) stressed the primacy of Israel by combining wisdom with the Torah, but he still attempted to do justice to other nations’ con- tacts with wisdom as well. One step further was taken by Baruch, as only Israel is depicted as the recipient of wisdom (Bar. 3–4). This more particularistic understanding of wisdom was also employed by the sages who wrote the compositions 4Q185 and 4Q525. Both of them emphasize the hereditary nature of wisdom, and 4Q525 even explicitly denies foreigners’ share of wisdom. The author of Psalm 154 goes furthest along this line of development by claiming wisdom to be a sole possession of the righteous among the Israelites. The question about possessing wisdom has moved from the level of nations to a matter of debate between different groups within Judaism. 1. Introduction Israel as the Chosen People is one of the central theological themes in the Hebrew Bible.2 Israel’s specific relationship with God gains its impressive for- mulation in the so-called Bundesformel: “I will be your God, and you shall be my people” (e.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing a Dvar Torah
    PREPARING A DVAR TORAH GUIDELINES AND RESOURCES Preparing a dvar Torah 1 Preparing a dvar Torah 2 Preparing a dvar Torah 1 MANY PEOPLE WHO ARE ASKED TO GIVE a dvar Torah don't know where to begin. Below are some simple guidelines and instructions. It is difficult to provide a universal recipe because there are many different divrei Torah models depending on the individual, the context, the intended audience and the weekly portion that they are dealing with! However, regardless of content, and notwithstanding differences in format and length, all divrei Torah share some common features and require similar preparations. The process is really quite simple- although the actual implementation is not always so easy. The steps are as follows: Step One: Understand what a dvar Torah is Step Two: Choose an issue or topic (and how to find one) Step Three: Research commentators to explore possible solutions Step Four: Organize your thoughts into a coherent presentation 1Dvar Torah: literallly, 'a word of Torah.' Because dvar means 'a word of...' (in the construct form), please don't use the word dvar without its necessary connected direct object: Torah. Instead, you can use the word drash, which means a short, interpretive exposition. Preparing a dvar Torah 3 INTRO First clarify what kind of dvar Torah are you preparing. Here are three common types: 1. Some shuls / minyanim have a member present a dvar Torah in lieu of a sermon. This is usually frontal (ie. no congregational response is expected) and may be fifteen to twenty minutes long. 2. Other shuls / minyanim have a member present a dvar Torah as a jumping off point for a discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Garden of Eden to the New Creation in Christ : a Theological Investigation Into the Significance and Function of the Ol
    The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Theses 2017 From the Garden of Eden to the new creation in Christ : A theological investigation into the significance and function of the Old estamentT imagery of Eden within the New Testament James Cregan The University of Notre Dame Australia Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses Part of the Religion Commons COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further copying or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Do not remove this notice. Publication Details Cregan, J. (2017). From the Garden of Eden to the new creation in Christ : A theological investigation into the significance and function of the Old Testament imagery of Eden within the New Testament (Doctor of Philosophy (College of Philosophy and Theology)). University of Notre Dame Australia. https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses/181 This dissertation/thesis is brought to you by ResearchOnline@ND. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@ND. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FROM THE GARDEN OF EDEN TO THE NEW CREATION IN CHRIST: A THEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE SIGNIFICANCE AND FUNCTION OF OLD TESTAMENT IMAGERY OF EDEN WITHIN THE NEW TESTAMENT. James M. Cregan A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame, Australia. School of Philosophy and Theology, Fremantle. November 2017 “It is thus that the bridge of eternity does its spanning for us: from the starry heaven of the promise which arches over that moment of revelation whence sprang the river of our eternal life, into the limitless sands of the promise washed by the sea into which that river empties, the sea out of which will rise the Star of Redemption when once the earth froths over, like its flood tides, with the knowledge of the Lord.
    [Show full text]
  • Newly Discovered – the First River of Eden!
    NEWLY DISCOVERED – THE FIRST RIVER OF EDEN! John D. Keyser While most people worry little about pebbles unless they are in their shoes, to geologists pebbles provide important, easily attained clues to an area's geologic composition and history. The pebbles of Kuwait offered Boston University scientist Farouk El-Baz his first humble clue to detecting a mighty river that once flowed across the now-desiccated Arabian Peninsula. Examining photos of the region taken by earth-orbiting satellites, El-Baz came to the startling conclusion that he had discovered one of the rivers of Eden -- the fabled Pishon River of Genesis 2 -- long thought to have been lost to mankind as a result of the destructive action of Noah's flood and the eroding winds of a vastly altered weather system. This article relates the fascinating details! In Genesis 2:10-14 we read: "Now a river went out of Eden to water the garden, and from there it parted and became FOUR RIVERHEADS. The name of the first is PISHON; it is the one which encompasses the whole land of HAVILAH, where there is gold. And the gold of that land is good. Bdellium and the onyx stone are there. The name of the second river is GIHON; it is the one which encompasses the whole land of Cush. The name of the third river is HIDDEKEL [TIGRIS]; it is the one which goes toward the east of Assyria. The fourth river is the EUPHRATES." While two of the four rivers mentioned in this passage are recognisable today and flow in the same general location as they did before the Flood, the other two have apparently disappeared from the face of the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Torah Toons One Sample
    1. Bereshit Genesis 1:1-6:8 At the beginning of God’s creating of the heavens and the earth (Genesis 1:1). [1] BERESHIT starts things. God creates the world. This is done in seven days. On the first day, light is created. On the second day, there is a division of the waters. On the third day, dry land appears and plants begin to grow. On the fourth day, God creates the things which give light—the sun, moon and stars. On the fifth day, birds and fish are created. And, on the sixth day, God creates animals and people. On the seventh day, God rests. [2] Next, the sidrah tells the story of what happens in the Garden of Eden. The garden is described, and Adam then Havva are created. The garden has two trees in its center—the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowing Good from Evil. Havva and Adam are told not to eat from the trees in the center, but do so at the urging of the snake. God then sends Adam and Havva from the garden. Two angels guard the entrance. 5 [3] Once outside the garden, Adam and Havva have two sons: Kayin and Hevel. Kayin is a farmer and Hevel is a shepherd. Both offer sacrifices to God, but God accepts only Hevel’s offering. The two then fight and Kayin kills Hevel. God then marks Kayin, who heads off into the sunset. [4] The sidrah ends with a list of the ten generations from Adam to Noah. At the end of the list the Torah gives us a preview of COMING ATTRACTIONS: Tune in next week for the Flood.
    [Show full text]