DOCSLIB.ORG

3.2 an Evaluation of Fds and Clark Coupled Wildfire Model

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3.2 an Evaluation of Fds and Clark Coupled Wildfire Model 3.2 AN EVALUATION OF FDS AND CLARK COUPLED WILDFIRE MODEL Ruiyu Sun1 ∗ and Steven K. Krueger1 and Mary Ann Jenkins2 and William Mell3 and Joseph J. Charney4 1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 2York University, Toronto, Canada 3National Institute of Stardards and Technology,Gaiithersburg,MD 4United States Forest Service, North Central Research Station,Easy Lansing,MI 1. Introduction wildland fire, it is not possible to develop models that include all scales. Therefore, depending on the mod- Wildland fire is a natural phenomenon involving com- eler’s interests, each fire model concentrates on mod- plex chemical and physical processes. The range of eling wildfire behavior within a certain scale range. Ac- length scales for each process is large, from the sub- cording to Mell et al (2005), there are four basic types millimeter scale (combustion process) to the kilometer of models depending on whether the two interactions scale (convection process). In the evolution of a large are involved: operational models that do not explicitly wildland fire, the interactions between the flame and include the two interactions; models that mainly in- the fire plume and the local close–in and larger–scale volve the flame+plume/atmosphere interaction; mod- environment are important. The fires studied by Baum els that mainly involve the flame/fuel interaction; and (2000) can be characterized by the nature of their in- models that include both interactions to a greater or teraction with the local environment, where the local lesser degree. environment is defined by the geometry and burning The Clark coupled atmosphere–fire model (Clark et characteristics of the fuel bed, the properties of the am- al 1996; hereafter referred to as the Clark coupled bient close–in atmosphere, and the local topography. model) is an example of a wildfire model that empha- The two most important interactions therefore are be- sizes the interaction between the fire plume and the tween the fire flame and the fuel (hereafter referred atmosphere, and is designed to simulate wildland fires to as flame–fuel interaction), and between the fire over scales where a typical computational grid size of flame and plume and the ambient atmosphere (here- 10s of meters is too coarse to resolve physical pro- after referred to as flame+plume–atmosphere interac- cesses in the combustion zone. Evolving model winds tion). The flame–fuel interaction involves gas gener- from the lowest levels of the atmospheric fluid dynam- ation by solid fuel pyrolysis, the subsequent combus- ical model are passed to an operational empirically– tion of the fuel gases, and the resultant heat flux back based fire–spread–rate formulation (e.g., Hirsch 1996, to the solid fuel. The flame+plume–atmosphere in- Rothermel 1972) which is used to advance the fireline teraction involves the response of the fire flame and (Clark et al 2004). Because the thermal degradation of plume to the ambient atmospheric conditions and the the solid fuel is not modeled directly and combustion response of the atmosphere to the buoyant fire plume. is parameterized, computational resources are devoted This interaction can alter the orientation and geometry to resolving atmospheric physics. of the fire flame and plume, influencing the distribu- Examples of a wildfire modeling approach similar tion and intensity of the net heat flux to the solid fuel to the multiphase models that involve both inter- and the burning of the fuel (Mell et al 2005), and con- actions are the Fire Dynamic Simulator (FDS) and sequently changing the properties of local atmospheric FIRETEC. FIRETEC was designed at the Los Alamos conditions. National Laboratory (Linn 1997; Linn et al 2002; Linn It is extremely difficult to study wildland fires by di- et al 2005) and built to analyze complex wildfire behav- rect observation. Along with the cost and safety issues, ior that the current operational empirically–based wild- controlled fire experiments are practically impossible to fire models cannot represent. The FDS was designed at achieve in a natural setting. For these reasons current the Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and computational fluid dynamical models are important originally built to analyze industrial-scale fires. Mell et tools for the study of wildfire, especially severe wild- al (2005) has extended the FDS to simulate outdoor fire. fires in vegetative fuels (called WFDS for Wildland Fire Because of the wide range of scales involved in a Dynamics Simulator). In these models the pyrolysis of ∗ fuels and gas phase combustion are implemented in Corresponding author address: Department of Meteorology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. E-mail: a numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations, [email protected] appropriate for low-speed, thermally-driven flow with an emphasis on smoke and heat transport from fires. was about 600 MW. Measurements were taken us- Computational resources are devoted to resolving fire ing a radiosonde-radiowind system, kite balloons, pho- combustion and the close–in fire/atmosphere flow over togrammetry from four observing stations, a ground the fire. network of temperature and wind velocity sensors, and Though capable of accounting for almost all the vari- an aircraft. The plume’s geometrical parameters, in- ables that exist in wildfire prediction, the computa- cluding radius (accuracy estimated at 10%) and verti- tional fluid dynamical models are not yet suitable for cal velocity at the visible boundary of the plume, delim- faster–than–real–time applications on today’s comput- ited by thick black smoke, were determined by a pho- ers. Such models can be used to improve our com- togrammetric method (Saporte 1966). Temperature prehension of wildfire and the accuracy of operational and vertical velocity measurements were made directly wildfire models to forecast actual fire spread and be- in the plume with a radiosonde system using a kite havior. Before applying these wildfire simulation mod- balloon. Below 600 m, plume–averaged vertical veloc- els to these problems, model validation is necessary. ity data were obtained with photogrammetry and the We need to compare model results to real fires. radio-sounding kite balloon, while at higher altitudes Proper model evaluation requires an appropriate set these data were obtained only with photogrammetry of field observations, taken under well–documented of the rising plume edge. and controlled conditions, and carefully analyzed for Benech (1976) claimed that the following plume fire behavior. In the so–called “Meteotron” fire experi- properties remained practically identical below the first ment, Benech (1976) presented the results of measure- 600 m of elevation for all experimental fires: ments in and around convective plumes initiated in the • atmosphere from the ground by an exceptionally pow- plume averaged radius at a given altitude; erful artificial heat source. The experimental project • plume vertical velocities at a given altitude; was designed to provide data for theoretical study of a 3 −1 stationary, non-spreading, convective fire plume. • vertical flux (m s ) at a given altitude, deduced The purpose of this report therefore is to use the from the former data; results from the Meteotron fire to examine how well • and temperature difference (hereafter referred to the FDS and Clark model depict low–level struc- as temperature excess) between the inside and the ture/properties of this type of fire plume. A fire outside of the plume at a given altitude. plume represents how the major portion of the en- ergy from the fire’s combustion process is put into the In the following sections, the FDS and Clark cou- atmosphere and the resulting buoyancy distribution. pled model simulations are compared to the Meteotron The plume is one mechanism for the flame+plume– mean plume radius, vertical velocity, mass flux, and atmosphere interaction. The turbulent characteristics temperature excess (temperature difference between of the plume also mean that surrounding air will be the plume–averaged temperature and environment– entrained into the plume and consequently a flow will averaged temperature) taken from Figures 5, 6, 7, and be induced in the air surrounding the fire. Once we 8 in Benech (1976), and the mean plume buoyancy flux demonstrate here how accurately the FDS and the constructed with these data. Clark coupled model simulate the properties and be- havior of a stationary, non-spreading plume, we can 3. Numerical Experimental Set-up begin to use WFDS, a physically–based multiphase fire model, to improve the fire parameterizations for A single FDS simulation and two Clark coupled model spreading fires utilized by wildfire coupled models and simulations were completed, and results from the sim- the forecast accuracy of operational models like FAR- ulations are compared to each other and to the obser- SITE. vational data from the Meteotron fire experiment. The version of FDS used in this study is described 2. The Meteotron Experiment by Mell et al (2005). The FDS domain was 400 m (x) × 400 m (y) × 600 m (z) and covered by a grid mesh From 1971 to 1973 Benech (1976) conducted eleven of 100 (x) × 100 (y) × 100 (z). The vertical grid was atmospheric fire plume experiments during the Me- stretched and vertical grid size was about 3 m near teotron fire experiment. The heat source consisted ground level. The model atmosphere was isothermal, of 97 burners arranged into a hexagonal area of with an ambient temperature of 30.85◦C. A uniform about 4000 m2 (radius 36 m). The experiments wind of 3 m s−1 and constant with height blew into generally lasted five to ten minutes, and in most of the domain from the west (in the positive x direction). the experiments the total theoretical thermal power To match the size and total heat release rate of the 2 Meteotron fires (4000 m2; 600 MW), a square fire of ing the plume soot density provided by the FDS simu- 63.25 m × 63.25 m was set.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PITT Research Brief Pyrolysis
    POTENTIAL PFAS DESTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY: PYROLYSIS AND GASIFICATION In Spring 2020, the EPA established the PFAS Innovative Treatment Team (PITT). The PITT was a multi-disciplinary research team that worked full-time for 6-months on applying their scientific efforts and expertise to a single problem: disposal and/or destruction of PFAS- contaminated media and waste. While the PITT formally concluded in Fall 2020, the research efforts initiated under the PITT continue. As part of the PITT’s efforts, EPA researchers considered whether existing destruction technologies could be applied to PFAS-contaminated media and waste. This series of Research Briefs provides an overview of four technologies that were identified by the PITT as promising technologies Figure 1. Biosolids beneficial use. for destroying PFAS and the research underway by the readily available, cost effective, and produce little to no EPA’s Office of Research and Development to further hazardous residuals or byproducts. Pyrolysis and explore these technologies. Because research is still gasification have been identified as promising needed to evaluate these technologies for PFAS technologies that may be able to meet these destruction, this Research Brief should not be considered requirements with further development, testing, and an endorsement or recommendation to use this demonstrations. technology to destroy PFAS. Background Pyrolysis/Gasification: Technology Overview Pyrolysis is a process that decomposes materials at Various industries have produced and used per- and moderately elevated temperatures in an oxygen-free polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) since the mid-20th environment. Gasification is similar to pyrolysis but uses century. PFAS are found in consumer and industrial small quantities of oxygen, taking advantage of the products, including non-stick coatings, waterproofing partial combustion process to provide the heat to materials, and manufacturing additives.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Products: Thermal Degradation and Fire
    Wood Products: Thermal Degradation and off. The hemicelluloses and lignin components are pyrolyzed in the ranges 200-300°C and 225-450 °C, Fire respectively (see Wood, Constituents of). Much of the acetic acid liberated from wood pyrolysis is attributed Wood is a thermally degradable and combustible to deactylation of hemicellulose. Dehydration reac­ material. Applications range from a biomass provid­ tions around 200°C are primarily responsible for ing useful energy to a building material with unique pyrolysis of hemicellulose and lignin and results in a properties. Wood products can contribute to unwant­ high char yield for wood. Although cellulose remains ed fires and be destroyed as well. Minor amounts of mostly unpyrolyzed, its thermal degradation can be thermal degradation adversely affect structural pro­ accelerated in the presence of water, acids, and oxygen. perties. Therefore, knowledge of the thermal degrad­ As the temperature increases, the degree of poly­ ation and fire performance of wood can be critical in merization of cellulose decreases further, free radicals many applications. Chemical treatments are available appear, and carbonyl, carboxyl, and hydroperoxide to improve fire performance characteristics. groups are formed. Bryden (1998) assumed tar under- goes cracking to lighter gases and repolymerization to char while streaming through the hot charred residue. Overall pyrolysis reactions are endothermic due to 1. Thermal Degradation decreasing dehydration and increasing CO formation As wood reaches elevated temperatures, the different from porous char reactions with H2O and CO2 with chemical components undergo the thermal de- increasing temperature. During this “low-temperature gradation that affects the performance of wood. The pathway” of pyrolysis, exothermic reactions of ex- extent of the changes depends on the temperature level posed char and volatiles with atmospheric oxygen are and length of time under exposure conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyrolysis Fuel Oil (PFO)
    PRODUCT BACKGROUNDER Pyrolysis Fuel Oil (PFO) Important! For detailed information on this product and emergency measures, obtain the Canadian Safety Data Sheet (SDS)/ U.S. Safety Data Sheet (SDS). In the case of an emergency, please call our 24-hour hotline at 1-800-561-6682 or 1-403-314-8767. May also be called: PFO-Joffre, Heavy Fuel Oils Product/Substance Use: • This product is a complex mixture of naphthalene, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, indene, and dicyclopentadiene, manufactured at NOVA Chemicals' Joffre, Alberta facility and shipped by railcar. • This product is used as chemical intermediate feedstock or industrial fuel. Characteristics and Safe Handling: • This product is a dark coloured, oily liquid with a pungent odour whose odour threshold is < 1 ppm. • This product is classified as a flammable liquid, health and environmental hazard in the workplace and as flammable for transportation. • Any equipment used in areas of handling or storage of the heated product must be approved for flammable liquids and properly grounded for control of static electricity. • If released from containment, product may be ignited by uncontrolled heat, sparks or flames. Containers exposed to fire conditions may explode. • Material burns readily when heated, and sparks or flames may ignite released hot liquids, vapours or mists. The vapor is heavier than air and may collect in low areas Ignition from a distant source with flashback is possible. • Any release to land or water must be isolated, controlled to avoid ignition, contained and recovered or cleaned up by properly trained and equipped personnel. Health and Safety Information: • Wear all recommended personal protective equipment if any contact with this material is likely.
    [Show full text]
  • 1983 Center for Fire Research Annual Conference on Fire Research
    1983 CENTER FOR FIRE RESEARCH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON FIRE RESEARCH (Summaries of Research Grants and CFR In-House Programs) August 23-25, 1983 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards National Engineering Laboratory Center for Fire Research Washington, D.C. 20234 July 1983 Preprint of the 1983 Center for Fire Research Annual Conference on Fire Research to be Held August 23-25, 1983 QC 100 .U56 #82-2612- 1983 CENTER FOR FIRE RESEARCH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON FIRE RESEARCH (Summaries of Research Grants and CFR In-House Programs) August 23-25, 1983 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards National Engineering Laboratory Center for Fire Research Washington, D.C. 20234 July 1983 Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce Ernest Ambler, Director, National Bureau of Standards Preprint of the 1983 Center for Fire Research Annual Conference on Fire Research to be Held August 23-25, 1983 — FOREWORD The Seventh Annual Conference on Fire Research honors Professor Howard Emmons who retires from Harvard University this year. Professor Emmons has provided leadership and inspiration to many in this field as attested by the breadth and depth of the topics in the conference modeling of fire growth, flame phenomena and spread, diffusion flames and radiation, fire plumes , extinction and suppression— and the contributions of those he has taught. Howard Emmons has demonstrated the viability of scientifically based fire protection engineering practice. Of course, much remains to be done. The conference program and papers (to be published separately) provide a good indication of where we are in a numoer or crt-txcal areas of tare science.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicity of the Pyrolysis and Combustion Products of Poly (Vinyl Chlorides): a Literature Assessment
    FIRE AND MATERIALS VOL. II, 131-142 (1987) Toxicity of the Pyrolysis and Combustion Products of Poly (Vinyl Chlorides): A Literature Assessment Clayton Huggett and Barbara C. Levin* us Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, National Engineering Laboratory, Center for Fire Research, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA Poly(vinyl chlorides) (PVC) constitute a major class of synthetic plastics. Many surveys of the voluminous literature have been performed. This report reviews the literature published in English from 1969 through 1984 and endeavors to be more interpretive than comprehensive. pve compounds, in general, are among the more fire resistant common organic polymers, natural or synthetic. The major products of thermal decomposition include hydrogen chloride, benzene and unsaturated hydrocarbons. In the presence of oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and water are included among the common combustion products. The main toxic products from PVC fires are hydrogen chloride (a sensory and pulmonary irritant) and carbon monoxide (an asphyxiant). The LCso values calculated for a series of natural and synthetic materials thermally decomposed according to the NBS toxicity test method ranged from 0.045 to 57 mgl-l in the flaming mode and from 0.045 to > 40mgl-l in the non-flaming mode. The LCso results for a PVC resin decomposed under the same conditions were 17 mg 1- 1 in the flaming mode and 20 mg 1- 1 in the non-flaming mode. These results indicate that PVC decomposition products are not extremely toxic when compared with those from other common building materials. When the combustion toxicity (based on their HCI content) of PVC materials is compared with pure HCI experiments, it appears that much of the post-exposure toxicity can be explained by the HCI tha t is genera ted.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Deaths and Toxic Gases Ization and the Development of Separate Tests in Germany, France, Japan and from Barbara Chernov Levin Belgium
    18 News& Views Nature Vol. 300 4 November 1982 International Organization for Standard­ Fire deaths and toxic gases ization and the development of separate tests in Germany, France, Japan and from Barbara Chernov Levin Belgium. All these tests provide information on AMoNG the industrialized countries which of Utah7 and suggests the need for an the acute toxicity resulting from the record statistics on fires, the United States animal testing system - conventional inhalation of combustion products, but has the most fires per capita. The rate of chemical techniques would have failed to each test is performed in different labor­ fire death in the United States is almost detect such an unusual toxic product. atory decomposition conditions. The tests twice the international average and is sur­ Moreover, scientists at the National do not address the problem of the total passed only by Canada 1 • In 1979, approxi­ Bureau of Standards have found that car­ toxic hazard which a fire produces or the mately 7,800 people died and another bon monoxide concentrations measured at contribution of a material (or product in its 2 31,000 were reported injured • Direct the LC50 of twelve thermally decomposed actual end use) to that hazard under a 'real dollar loss was greater than $5 billion, but materials were 60-4,400 p.p.m., whereas fire' situation. Nonetheless, some building when indirect costs (meeting fire codes, the LC50 of pure carbon monoxide was code officials and state regulators are installing fire protection systems, support­ 5,000 p.p.m. The LC50 here measures the anxious to evaluate the combustion ing fire departments and insuring property) amount of material necessary to kill 50 per product toxicity of materials and are exam­ are included in this calculation, the annual cent of the rats exposed for 30 min.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyrolysis of Char Forming Solid Fuels: a Critical Review of the Mathematical Modelling Techniques
    Proceedings, 5th AOSFST, Newcastle, Australia, 2001 Editors: M.A. Delichatsios, B.Z. Dlugogorski and E.M. Kennedy PYROLYSIS OF CHAR FORMING SOLID FUELS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE MATHEMATICAL MODELLING TECHNIQUES B. Moghtaderi Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Newcastle AUSTRALIA ABSTRACT Recent advances in mathematical modelling and numerical analysis of the pyrolysis of char forming solid fuels have shed new light on the pyrolytic behaviour of these materials under fire conditions. A review of the pyrolysis models of charring solid fuels developed over the past 30 years is presented in the order of increasing complexity. The models can be broadly categorised into thermal and comprehensive type models. While thermal models predict the conversion of the virgin fuel into products based on a critical pyrolysis criterion and the energy balance, the comprehensive models describe the degradation of the fuel by a chemical kinetic scheme coupled with the conservation equations for the transport of heat and/or mass. A variety of kinetic schemes have been reported in the literature ranging from simple one-step global reactions to semi-global and multi-step reaction mechanisms. There has been much less uniformity in the description of the transport phenomena (i.e. heat and mass) in comprehensive models and different levels of approximation have been used. It is shown that the accuracy of pyrolysis models largely depends on the model parameters. If reliable data are not available, even the most advanced models give poor predictions. Keywords: Pyrolysis, charring solid fuels, mathematical modelling, fires. INTRODUCTION Pyrolysis of solid fuels plays an important role in both the ignition and growth stages of fires.
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomous Kinetic Modeling of Biomass Pyrolysis Using Chemical Reaction Neural Networks
    Autonomous Kinetic Modeling of Biomass Pyrolysis using Chemical Reaction Neural Networks Weiqi Ji a,1, Franz Richter b,1, Michael J. Gollner b, Sili Deng a,* a Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. b Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94701, USA. 1 Weiqi Ji and Franz Richter contribute equally to this work. * Corresponding author: Sili Deng ([email protected]). Abstract Modeling the burning processes of biomass such as wood, grass, and crops is crucial for the modeling and prediction of wildland and urban fire behavior. Despite its importance, the burning of solid fuels remains poorly understood, which can be partly attributed to the unknown chemical kinetics of most solid fuels. Most available kinetic models were built upon expert knowledge, which requires chemical insights and years of experience. This work presents a framework for autonomously discovering biomass pyrolysis kinetic models from thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) experimental data using the recently developed chemical reaction neural networks (CRNN). The approach incorporated the CRNN model into the framework of neural ordinary differential equations to predict the residual mass in TGA data. In addition to the flexibility of neural-network-based models, the learned CRNN model is fully interpretable, by incorporating the fundamental physics laws, such as the law of mass action and Arrhenius law, into the neural network structure. The learned CRNN model can then be translated into the classical forms of biomass chemical kinetic models, which facilitates the extraction of chemical insights and the integration of the kinetic model into large-scale fire simulations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Pyrolysis and Gasification in a Carbon Negative Economy
    processes Review The Role of Pyrolysis and Gasification in a Carbon Negative Economy Robert C. Brown Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA; [email protected] Abstract: The International Panel on Climate Change and the 2015 Climate Summit in Paris have recommended that efforts to reduce carbon emissions be coupled with carbon removal from the atmosphere. Carbon negative energy combines net carbon removal with the production of energy products or other revenue-generating products beyond sequestered carbon. Even though both biochemical and thermochemical approaches to carbon negative energy can be envisioned, this paper considers the prospects for the latter including pyrolysis and gasification. The fundamentals of these two processes are described to better understand how they would be integrated with carbon removal. Characteristics of pyrolysis and gasification are related to the kinds of sequestration agents they would produce, the scale of their deployment, the fraction of biomass carbon that could ultimately sequestered, the challenges of effectively sequestering these different forms of carbon and the economics of thermochemical carbon negative energy. Keywords: carbon removal; carbon negative energy; pyrolysis; gasification; biomass; biochar 1. Introduction Despite policymakers’ efforts to regulate emissions of greenhouse gases, the concen- Citation: Brown, R.C. The Role tration of carbon dioxide in in the atmosphere continues to rise. In 2014, the International of Pyrolysis and Gasification in a Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) recommended that efforts to reduce carbon emissions Carbon Negative Economy. Processes be coupled with carbon removal from the atmosphere [1]. Similarly, the 2015 Climate 2021, 9, 882. https://doi.org/ Summit in Paris concluded that nations should strive for a balance between anthropogenic 10.3390/pr9050882 emissions by sources and removals by sinks of greenhouse gases [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Effects Guide This Page Was Last Modified 06/21/01 |Disclaimer| | Privacy| | Copyright| |Webmaster|
    National Wildfire Coordinating Group Fire Effects Guide This page was last modified 06/21/01 |Disclaimer| | Privacy| | Copyright| |Webmaster| Home Preface FIRE EFFECTS GUIDE Objectives Fire Behavior Fuels Sponsored by: Air Quality Soils & Water Plants National Wildlife Coordinating Group Wildlife Cultural Res. Fire Use Working Team Grazing Mgmt. Evaluation Copies of the guide (NFES 2394) can be ordered form: Data Analysis Computer National Interagency Fire Center Soft. Great Basin Area Cache Glossary 3833 S. Development Ave. Bibliography Boise ID 83702 Contributions National Wildfire Coordinating Group Fire Effects Guide This page was last modified 06/20/01 |Disclaimer| | Privacy| | Copyright| |Webmaster| Home PREFACE Preface Objectives by Dr. Bob Clark and Melanie Miller Fire Behavior Fuels A. Purpose Air Quality Soils & Water Plants The Federal government manages a variety of ecosystems across the Wildlife United States, including deserts, grasslands, tundra, shrublands, Cultural Res. forestlands, estuaries, and riparian zones. These ecosystems range Grazing from arid to humid, warm to cold, and sea level to over 10,000 feet Mgmt. elevation. Fires naturally occur in almost all of these ecosystems, with Evaluation fire characteristics determined by climate, vegetation, and terrain. Data Analysis Computer The purposes of this Guide are to summarize available information on Soft. fire effects principles and processes, provide references for additional Glossary information, and provide guidelines for the collection, analysis, and Bibliography evaluation of wild and prescribed fire effects data. Basic mechanisms of Contributions fire effects are described so that the reader will be able to understand and interpret fire effects literature, and evaluate observed results that conflict with those presented in published reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Soils and Water
    United States Department of Agriculture Wildland Fire in Forest Service Rocky Mountain Ecosystems Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42- volume 4 Effects of Fire on Soil and Water September 2005 Abstract _____________________________________ Neary, Daniel G.; Ryan, Kevin C.; DeBano, Leonard F., eds. 2005. (revised 2008). Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on soils and water. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol.4. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 250 p. This state-of-knowledge review about the effects of fire on soils and water can assist land and fire managers with information on the physical, chemical, and biological effects of fire needed to successfully conduct ecosystem management, and effectively inform others about the role and impacts of wildland fire. Chapter topics include the soil resource, soil physical properties and fire, soil chemistry effects, soil biology responses, the hydrologic cycle and water resources, water quality, aquatic biology, fire effects on wetland and riparian systems, fire effects models, and watershed rehabilitation. Keywords: ecosystem, fire effects, fire regime, fire severity, soil, water, watersheds, rehabilitation, soil properties, hydrology, hydrologic cycle, soil chemistry, soil biology, fire effects models The larger bold check-mark boxes indicate the volumes in “The Rainbow Series” currently published. To order, check any box or boxes below, fill in the address form, and send to the mailing address listed below. Or send your order and your address in mailing label form to one of the other listed media. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 1. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Pyrolisis Temperature and Time on Liquid Smoke Characteristics
    E3S Web of Conferences 148, 02007 (2 020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20 2014802007 ETMC and RC EnvE 2019 Effect of pyrolisis temperature and time on liquid smoke characteristics Seri Maulina1,2,*, Rizki Amalia1, and Ekanzha R Kamny1 1Department of Chemical Enginnering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia 2Sustainable Energy and Biomaterial Center of Excellence, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia Abstract.Oil palm frond is a lignocellulose material, by pyrolysis, it will produce liquid smoke which have many advantages because of the compounds, such as acetic acid, carbonyls and phenolics contained in it. The pyrolysis of oil palm fronds in this study carried out at temperatures 400 oC, 500 oC, and 600 oC for 40 minutes, 90 minutes, and 120 minutes. There were 3 parameters observed in this study, they were acetic acid, phenolics and carbonyl contents which were analyzed by GC-MS instrument. The results of the study showed that the different temperatures and times of pyrolysis affected the content of chemical components in liquid smoke and acetic acid was the most dominant component obtained in the liquid smoke. The highest acetic acid content in the liquid smoke obtained was 92,30% at pyrolysis temperature of 500 oC for 120 minutes. Meanwhile, the highest total phenolic content obtained was 7,32% at pyrolysis temperature of 600 oC for 120 minutes and the highest carbonyl content obtained was 32,56% at the pyrolysis temperature of 400 oC for 60 minutes 1 Introduction as biosepticide to reduce termites impact on wood [11, 12]. In the oil palm plantation, the major biomass wastes are Raw material type along with pyrolysis operation trunks and oil palm fronds [1].
    [Show full text]