DOCSLIB.ORG

“The Forced Migration from Russia to Ottoman Empire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“The Forced Migration from Russia to Ottoman Empire EMIGRATIONS FROM THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE TO THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: AN ANALYSIS IN THE LIGHT OF THE NEW ARCHIVAL MATERIALS A Master’s Thesis by BERAT YILDIZ THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA September 2006 To Denef “EMIGRATIONS FROM THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE TO THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: AN ANALYSIS IN THE LIGHT OF THE NEW ARCHIVAL MATERIALS” The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by BERAT YILDIZ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA September 2006 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. -------------------------------- Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hakan Kır ıml ı Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. --------------------------------- Asst. Prof. Dr. Hasan Ünal Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. --------------------------------- Asst. Prof. Dr.Oktay Özel Examining Committee Member Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences --------------------------------- Prof. Dr. Erdal Erel Director ABSTRACT Yıldız, Berat M.A. Department of International Relations Supervisor: Associate Prof. Hakan Kırımlı September 2006 The aim of this study is to describe and evaluate a recently founded special registry book in the Ottoman Archives catalogued as BEO 291/1. The book gives various statistical data about the emigrants who were forced by the Russian Empire to emigrate to the Ottoman lands during the second half of the 19th century. Including the information about the immigrants, the registry book encompasses the six different places within the borders of Ottoman Empire. Besides the description of the book of 291/1, the thesis attempts to explain the settlement policy of the Ottoman Empire by analyzing the Adyge/Circassian settlements on the province of Ottoman Syria based on the data in the book with the help of other existing archival documents and monographs. Evidently, Ottoman Empire put deliberate policies into practice for the settlements of the immigrants who would become the loyal subjects to the Sultan in the next decades. Keywords: Emigration, Emigration Movements to the Ottoman Empire, Syria, Settlements of the Immigrants, Circassians, Adyges, Crimean Tatars, Nogays, Ajarians, Dagestanis, Abkhazians. iii ÖZET Yıldız, Berat Master tezi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi: Doçent Dr. Hakan Kırımlı Eylül 2006 Bu çalışmanın amacı Osmanlı Arşivlerinde yeni ortaya çıkartılan ve BEO 291/1 olarak kataloglanan defteri tavsif etmek ve değerlendirmektir. Defter Osmanlı sınırları dâhilindeki altı değişik yeri kapsamaktadır ve 19.yüzyılın ikinci yarısında Rusya imparatorluğu tarafından Osmanlı topraklarına göçe zorlanan muhacirlerle alakalı çeşitli istatistikî bilgiler içermektedir. Defterin tavsifinin yanında bu tez Osmanlı İmparatorluğunun iskân siyasetini, Adige/Çerkes muhacirlerin Suriye’deki yerleşimlerini defterdeki bilgiler, diğer arşiv belgeleri ve monograflar dâhilinde inceleyerek anlamaya çalışacaktır. Şurası açıktır ki Osmanlı imparatorluğu muhacirlerin yerleşimleri için basiretli siyasalar uygulamış ve bu da muhacirlerin birkaç on yıl içerisinde padişaha bağlı tebâ olmalarını sağlamıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Göç, Osmanlı İmparatorluğuna Göç Hareketleri, Suriye, Muhacirlerin İskânı, Çerkesler, Adigeler, Kırım Tatarları, Nogaylar, Abhazlar, Dağıstanlılar, Acaralılar. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my deep gratitude to my supervisor Associate Prof. Hakan Kırımlı. Without his guidance and encouragement, it would be sure that this thesis could have never been realized. His academic insights and visions did help me construct my thesis as well as my future plans. I am also grateful to Ass. Prof. Oktay Özel and, Ass. Prof. Hasan Ünal who participated in my jury and made important comments on draft of my thesis. I am also very grateful to Dr.Raşit Gündoğdu and Sefer Berzeg. They not only provided me with important source materials but also let me benefit from their deep knowledge on the subject. Last, but not least, my friends Chong Jin, Valeriy, İbrahim, Abdürrahim, Çağatay, and Pınar also deserve my special thanks for their every kind of supports during the preparation of this thesis. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT...................................................................................................... iii ÖZET................................................................................................................. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS................................................................................... v TABLE OF CONTENTS.............................................................................….. vi CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION AND HISTORIOGRAPHY....................…. 1 1.1 Literature Review .............................................................................. 4 CHAPTER II: THE PROCESS OF EMIGRATION TO THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: A GENERAL OUTLOOK...................................... 12 2.1 Emigration Phases.................................................................................. 12 2.1.1 Emigration Prior to the Crimean War...................................... 13 2.1.2 Emigration after the Crimean War........................................... 14 2.1.3. Emigration after the Ottoman-Russian War of 1877–1878…. 16 2.2 Emigrating Ethnic Groups..................................................................... 17 2.2.1 Circassians..........................................................................…. 17 2.2.2 Crimean Tatars and Nogays.................................................... 19 2.2.3 Abkhazians............................................................................. 22 2.2.4 Ajarians.................................................................................. 24 2.2.5 Dagestanis............................................................................. 25 CHAPTER III: THE BOOK OF “SADÂRET 291/1”............................... 27 3.1 Description of the Book of “Sadâret 291/1”..................................… 27 3.2 Biga...............................................................................................…. 29 3.3 Niğde..............................................................................................… 46 3.4 Aydın..............................................................................................… 49 3.5 Canik.................................................................................................. 59 3.6 Ankara...........................................................................................…. 92 vi CHAPTER IV: THE SETTLEMENTS OF THE CIRCASSIANS IN SYRIA.. 105 4.1 The Lands of the Syrian Province....................................................... 105 4.2 Circassian Settlements in Syria Prior to the Ottoman-Russian War of 1877- 1878........................................................................................ 107 4.3 The Circassian Settlements After the Ottoman-Russian War of 1877- 1878.............................................................................................….. 110 4.4 The Ottoman Settlement Policies Regarding the Circassians in Syria.. 112 4.5 Circassian Settlements in the Golan Heights....................................... 115 4.6 Two Surviving Immigrant Villages: Kfar Kama and Reyhaniye......... 117 4.7 Some Notes on the Settlements of Circassians in Syria...................... 118 CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION…………………........................................... 126 BIBLIOGRAPHY............................................................................................. 131 vii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORIOGRAPHY Beginning with the 18th century onwards, the appearent Russian supremacy over the Ottomans enabled Russian Empire to put the expansionist policies into practice on the newly acquired lands from the Ottoman Empire and the adjacent areas, particularly the Crimea and the Caucasus. Following the invasion, Russian Empire put the expulsion policy of the Muslims into practice aiming at forcing out the Muslim population from its native lands. The result was the еmigration of millions of Muslims to the lands of their coreligionist brethren in the Ottoman Empire. According with the Russian advance the bulk of the Muslim emigrants left their homeland in two waves after the Crimean War and the Ottoman-Russian War of 1877-1878 respectively though certain waves of the emigrations had taken place before the Crimean War. Though quite a few important studies were made on the emigration movements and its influences upon the demographic structure of the Ottoman Empire, an all-encompassing analysis of the emigration or its impacts is yet to be published. As the existing monographs are usually more descriptive in content, new some analytical approaches at the subject seem necessary. The depth of the topic 1 and the fact that it is largely untouched requires a comprehensive study based on extensive archival research especially by utilizing the material which has recently been made accessible. Of course, a better understanding of the effects of the immigration movement will
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the Lands of the Romanovs: an Annotated Bibliography of First-Hand English-Language Accounts of the Russian Empire
    ANTHONY CROSS In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of The Russian Empire (1613-1917) OpenBook Publishers To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/268 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917) Anthony Cross http://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2014 Anthony Cross The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt it and to make commercial use of it providing that attribution is made to the author (but not in any way that suggests that he endorses you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Cross, Anthony, In the Land of the Romanovs: An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917), Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/ OBP.0042 Please see the list of illustrations for attribution relating to individual images. Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omissions or errors will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. As for the rights of the images from Wikimedia Commons, please refer to the Wikimedia website (for each image, the link to the relevant page can be found in the list of illustrations).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Turks and Europe by Gaston Gaillard London: Thomas Murby & Co
    THE TURKS AND EUROPE BY GASTON GAILLARD LONDON: THOMAS MURBY & CO. 1 FLEET LANE, E.C. 1921 1 vi CONTENTS PAGES VI. THE TREATY WITH TURKEY: Mustafa Kemal’s Protest—Protests of Ahmed Riza and Galib Kemaly— Protest of the Indian Caliphate Delegation—Survey of the Treaty—The Turkish Press and the Treaty—Jafar Tayar at Adrianople—Operations of the Government Forces against the Nationalists—French Armistice in Cilicia—Mustafa Kemal’s Operations—Greek Operations in Asia Minor— The Ottoman Delegation’s Observations at the Peace Conference—The Allies’ Answer—Greek Operations in Thrace—The Ottoman Government decides to sign the Treaty—Italo-Greek Incident, and Protests of Armenia, Yugo-Slavia, and King Hussein—Signature of the Treaty – 169—271 VII. THE DISMEMBERMENT OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: 1. The Turco-Armenian Question - 274—304 2. The Pan-Turanian and Pan-Arabian Movements: Origin of Pan-Turanism—The Turks and the Arabs—The Hejaz—The Emir Feisal—The Question of Syria—French Operations in Syria— Restoration of Greater Lebanon—The Arabian World and the Caliphate—The Part played by Islam - 304—356 VIII. THE MOSLEMS OF THE FORMER RUSSIAN EMPIRE AND TURKEY: The Republic of Northern Caucasus—Georgia and Azerbaïjan—The Bolshevists in the Republics of Caucasus and of the Transcaspian Isthmus—Armenians and Moslems - 357—369 IX. TURKEY AND THE SLAVS: Slavs versus Turks—Constantinople and Russia - 370—408 2 THE TURKS AND EUROPE I THE TURKS The peoples who speak the various Turkish dialects and who bear the generic name of Turcomans, or Turco-Tatars, are distributed over huge territories occupying nearly half of Asia and an important part of Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewed Circassian Mobilization in the North Caucasus 20-Years After the Fall of the Soviet Union
    Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe Vol 11, No 2, 2012, 103-135 Copyright © ECMI 21 December 2012 This article is located at: http://www.ecmi.de/publications/detail/issue-22012-vol-11-254/ Renewed Circassian Mobilization in the North Caucasus 20-years after the Fall of the Soviet Union Lars Funch Hansen* University of Copenhagen The renewed ethnic mobilization among Circassians in the North Caucasus region in Russia that has unfolded since the latter half of the 2000s is illustrated by the establishment of new civil society organizations and a substantially increased number of internet-based initiatives. All of this reflects a new and increased form of agency and unity among the Circassians in which youth activism has played key role. It also illustrates how Circassian civil society actors and cyber-activists have not only been able to establish a counter-public sphere or develop a new space for action, but also increasingly have been able to move key issues from Circassian spheres into the wider public sphere of mainstream Russian media and politics. The upcoming 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, in particular, has functioned as a lever in this process, which has also resulted in increasing support among Circassians for calls for recognition of the nineteenth century forced expulsion of the majority of the Circassians from the Caucasus as an act of genocide. In this manner, a mega-event such as the Sochi Olympics has contributed to generating a more radical or politicized understanding or framing of the Caucasian exodus that, since the fall of the Soviet Union, has generally been known as “our national tragedy”.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Intelligence Review, Volume 23, Number 16, April 12
    What is LaRouche's tists many of them veterans of the Soviet "There exists no authority on Russia? space program possible solution • • April 1994, laRouche, paroled in On Oct. 12, 1988, in Berlin, laRouche In to this crisis, either issued his famous Food for Peace pro­ January after five years in prison, made for Russia or for posal, which included collaboration his first visit to Russia, at the invitation of the world within the between the Soviet Union and a free, re­ the Universal Ecological Academy. bounds of the united Germany to overcome the grow­ previously accepted ing economic crisis. WHY YOU NEED THIS REPORT: EIR's Special Report, issued in August includes terms of dominant • 1989, laRouche enunci­ 1994, In November "Russia�s Future: The Three Alternatives": international ated his Paris-Berlin-Vienna Productive Lyndon laRouche's account of his six-day trip economic and Triangle, an infrastructure program for to Russia. "A Reconstruction Strategy for financial institutions." the economic reconstruction of post­ Russia-And the World Economy" by communist Eurasia. -Lyndon LaRouche Lyndon H. laRouche, Jr. ''Whither Russia: • Situation Report," by Brig. Gen. Paul-Albert in "Prospects for Russian In October 1993, laRouche was elect­ A Economic Revival," ed to the Universal Ecological Academy Scherer (ret.) "The Military in Post­ prepared for Feb. 20, for his contributions to the science of Bolshevik Russia," by Konstantin George 1995 hearings at the phy sical economy. The Academy was "Have We Already Lost Eastern Europe Russian State Duma. and Russia?" by William Engdahl founded in May 1989 by a group of scien- Mail 142 pages, $250 EIR 94-004 to: __ Name __________________________________ ________ ____ ______ o Please sene the EIR Special Report, "Russia's future: dictatorship, chaos, or Address ___________________________________________________ _ reconstruction?" to the address shown.
    [Show full text]
  • Church – Consolidating the Georgian Regions
    Church – Consolidating the Georgian Regions Metropolitan Ananya Japaridze Saint Ilia the Righteous said from the very establishment of the holy Church of Georgia, that it presented a strong power consolidating the whole population of the state. It was not locked within the narrow ethnic borders but was the belonging of different ethnos residing in the state. According to Holy Writ, it never differentiated Hellenist from Jew, Georgian from non-Georgian, as its flocks were children of Georgia with mutual responsibility to the country and citizenship. Even Saint Nino, founder of the Georgian Church, came from Kapadokia. Saint of Georgian Church, martyr Razhden, and Saint Evstati Mtskheteli were Persian. Famous 12 fathers struggling against fire-worship and Monophysitism were Assyrian (Syrian). Neopyth Urbani Episcope was Arabian. The famous Saint Abo Tbileli came from Arabia too. The Saint Queen Shushanik was Armenian etc. The above list shows that Georgian church unified all citizens of the country in spite of their ethnic origin. At the same time, the Georgian church always used to create a united cultural space. The Georgian Church was consolidating regions and different ethnic groups of Georgia. The Georgian language was the key factor of Georgian Christian culture. Initially, Georgian language and based on it Georgian Christian culture embraced whole Georgia, all its regions. Divine services, all church acts, in mountains and lowlands from the Black Sea to Armenia and Albania were implemented only in Georgian language. Georgian language and Georgian culture dominated all over the Georgian territory. And just this differentiates old Georgia from the present one. It’s evident that the main flocks of Georgian Church were Georgians of West, South and East Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflicts in the North Caucasus
    Central Asian Survey, (1998), 17(3), 409-441. Conflicts in the North Caucasus SVANTE E. CORNELL* Although the conflicts that have attracted most international attention in the post- cold war era have been those of the Transcaucasus, another area of both potential and actual turmoil is the North Caucasus. The first example of serious conflicts in the area, naturally, is the war in Chechnia. However, the existence of this war, and its astonishing cruelty and devastation, has been instrumental in obscuring the other grievances that exist in the area, and that have the potential to escalate into open conflict. These can be divided into two main categories, which however spill over into one another. The first type of conflicts are those among the peoples of the region; the second type is conflicts between these peoples and Russia. Doubtlessly, the main example of the unrest in the North Caucasus has been the short but bloody war between the Ingush and the Ossetians. However, this war distinguishes itself only by being the only one of the conflicts in the region that has escalated into war. Among the other known problems, three issues call for special attention: First and perhaps most pressingly, the bid for unity of the Lezgian people in Dagestan and Azerbaijan; Second, the latent problem between the Turkic Karachai and the Circasssian peoples in the two neighbour republics of Karachaevo-Cherkessia and Kabardino-Balkaria; and thirdly the condition of the most complex of all the North Caucasian republics: Dagestan. It seems logical in this study to start with the most well-known of these issues: the war that raged in November 1992 in the Prigorodniy raion between the Ingush and the North Ossetians.
    [Show full text]
  • The Movement Toward a Monolingual Nation in Russia: the Language Policy in the Circassian Republics of the Northern Caucasus
    Journal of Caucasian Studies (JOCAS) / Kafkasya Çalışmaları - Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi September / Eylül 2015, Yıl / Vol. 1, № 1 ISSN 2149–9527 (print / basılı) ISSN 2149–9101 (online / çevrimiçi) The Movement Toward a Monolingual Nation in Russia: The Language Policy in the Circassian Republics of the Northern Caucasus Sufian Zhemukhov * Şener Aktürk ** Abstract In the context of an institutionalized multi-nationalist ideology, the language policy in Russia is based on the distinction of the native language of the Russian people and the languages of all other non- Russians. Such a distinction is reflected in ‘the Constitution of the Russian Federation,’ federal and regional laws and policy practices that have given advantage to Russian over the other titular languages of the indigenous people in the Russian Federation. This article charts the grand ‘shift’ in Russian state policy toward ethnic diversity. The Soviet- era multinational Leninist/Stalinist approach summarized in the slogan "druzhba narodov" (friendship of peoples) shifted toward a more assimilationist nation-building model. Such ideology reduces the ethnic diversity into just a cultural, folkloric feature of an otherwise monolingual, mono-cultural nation-state. What is the purpose of this discriminatory ethnic and language policy? Our case study of Circassians, one of the ethnic groups in the North Caucasus, demonstrates that, after many decades, such a policy has only caused political and cultural damages to all sides and alienation between them. On the one hand, the assimilationist language policy continues to cause problems with the non-Russian ethnic groups adding to the major challenges that the Russian state faces today. On the other hand, non-Russian ethnic groups, though not yet assimilated into the Russian culture, have undergone significant decrease in terms of their rights to develop their languages.
    [Show full text]
  • UNPO Plays Key Role in Transcaucasus Blowup
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 23, Number 16, April 12, 1996 so the Abkhazian war, which was a cause celebre for the ment of these troops to guard strategic roads and railways. In British Foreign Office.In December 1990, secessionist leader December, his rival, Gamsakhurdia, who had tried to organize Vladislav Ardzinba, a former department director of the So­ an insurrection against Shevardnadze in summer 1993, was viet Institute for Oriental Studies with specialization in an­ murdered by unknown assailants. In February 1994, Georgia cient Anatolian cults, was elected chairman of the Abkhazian and Russia signed a Friendship Treaty which mandated the Supreme Soviet. In July 1992, one month after the South creation of five Russian military bases in Georgia, and the Ossetian cease-fire, the Abkhazia Supreme Soviet ruled that stationing of Russian border guards along Georgia's border the 1925 constitution, which called for only a loose treaty with Turkey. relationship with Georgia, was in force. The Georgia State Council declared the ruling invalid. On Aug. 14, the Georgian Army invaded Abkhazia and occupied its capital, Sukhumi. But after the Confederation of Mountain Peoples of the Cau­ casus declared war on Georgia that month, the Abkhazians began a successful rollback of Georgian troops. UNPO plays key role in The Confederation, with Chechnya's Dudayev at the helm, claimed the Russians were supporting the Georgian Transcaucasus blowup advance against Abkhazia.Their aid to Abkhazia was justified on the basis of a need to stop Russian imperialism. On the by Mark Burdman other hand, the region's Cossacks also joined the Abkhazian side; the Abkhazian fight against Georgia, the Cossacks said, was important to secure a Greater Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Ethnic Cleansing and the Eurocentric International System on the Entrance of the Ottoman Empire Into the Great War, 1878-1914
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works School of Arts & Sciences Theses Hunter College Fall 1-5-2018 The Impact of Ethnic Cleansing and the Eurocentric International System on the Entrance of the Ottoman Empire into the Great War, 1878-1914 Parker Lake CUNY Hunter College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/hc_sas_etds/251 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Impact of Ethnic Cleansing and the Eurocentric International System on the Entrance of the Ottoman Empire into the Great War, 1878-1914 by Parker J. Lake Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History, Hunter College The City University of New York January 5, 2018 Thesis Sponsor: Date Signature January 5, 2018 Professor Karen M Kern Date Signature of Second Reader January 5, 2018 Professor Jonathan Rosenberg Table of Contents 1. Introduction……..………………………..……………………………………..……....1 2. Chapter 1……………………………………………………………….………..….....14 3. Chapter 2…………………………………………………………….…….….…….....37 4. Chapter 3…………………………………………………………….………..……….57 5. Chapter 4………………………………………………………….……….…….…….71 6. Conclusion…………...…………………………………………….………….…...….85 Appendix A……………………………………..……….………………………….……89 Appendix B…………………………………………..……………………….…….……90 Appendix C………………………………………………..………………….…….……91 Bibliography…………………………………………………..…………..……….……..92 1 Introduction The Ottoman Empire entered the First World War on the November 1, 1914, after three months of continuous appeals to both camps of the belligerent powers.1 The actions of the Great Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia, France, and Great Britain) over the course of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century had placed the Ottoman Empire in a precarious position.
    [Show full text]
  • Nato Mw Report 2004-2005
    Final Report - Manfred Wörner Fellowship 2004 / 2005 Prospects For Regional Cooperation on NATO’s South Eastern Border Developing a Turkish-Russian Cooperation in South Caucasus Submitted on 30 June 2005 By Dr. Burcu Gültekin Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris Turkish-Armenian Business Development Council In consultation with the Economy & Conflict Research Group of South Caucasus (ECRG) / International Alert 1 Acknowledgments This report has been possible thanks to NATO’s Manfred Wörner fellowship. I am profoundly grateful to the Public Diplomacy Division at NATO Headquarters, notably to Deputy Assistant Secretary General for External Relations Dr. Jamie Shea and to Dr. Stefanie Babst, Head of NATO Countries Section. My special thanks go to Despina Afentouli, Information Officer Greece and responsible for South Caucasus, whose friendly support has been particularly valuable throughout all the research process, and to Ioanna Synadino. I have benefited from conversations with Robert Simmons, Deputy Assistant Secretary General for Security Cooperation and Partnership and with Amb. Daniel Speckhard, Director of Policy Planning at the Office of the Secretary General. My deep thanks go to Ünal Çeviköz, Ambassador of Turkey to Bagdat, who has actively supported my work on the South Caucasus for many years and to Ertan Tezgör, Ambassador of Turkey to Tbilisi for his continuous help and multiple in-depth discussions during my research in Tbilisi. Brigadier General Muzaffer Çarpan, Turkish Armed Forces Attaché at the Turkish Embassy in Tbilisi, David Sikarulidze, Deputy Minister of Defense of Georgia and General Melkunian from the Ministry of Defense of Armenia have been gracious with their time and insights. I am grateful to Henry Cuny, Ambassador of France to Yerevan for his valuable support to my Turkish-Armenian initiatives, and to Amb.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Conflicts in North Caucasus
    ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИЕ ЗАМЕТКИ DOI: 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10044 ETHNIC CONFLICTS IN NORTH CAUCASUS Monalisha Acharjee Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India Article history: Abstract: Ethnic confl icts are a challenge to the state as it impacts the foreign policy as well as the domestic politics Received: of a nation. The region of North Caucasus has been the most 03.11.2018 unstable region among the Republics of the Russian Federation. The present article will analyse the causes of the rising tensions Accepted:: among the ethnic groups and the role of Russia in solving the 03.07.2019 problems in the region. It will further explain the drawbacks of the Russian authorities and will recommend policies which About the authors: could bring a positive change in the confl ict. The use of force PhD Research Scholar, Center for Russian and Central would not be able to bring any change in the region rather it Asian Studies, School of International Studies, would be more fruitful if efforts are made to address the causes Jawaharlal Nehru University for the ethnic violence. e-mail: [email protected] Key words: North Caucasus; ethnicity; Russia; security; Islam; Chechnya; confl ict The end of cold war and the disintegration has a vast density of languages anywhere on of the Soviet Union have resulted in an increase earth.2 The geostrategic location of the North in the number of ethnic confl icts in the region. Caucasus has played an important role in North Caucasus has been one such region in the the multi diversity of the ethnic group in the Russian Federation where till date there has been region.
    [Show full text]
  • Importance of Russian-Turkish War of 1877-1878 for the Circassian History
    CircassianWorld.com Importance of Russian-Turkish War of 1877-1878 for the Circassian History By Samir H. Hotko The Adygheyan Republican Institute of Humanitarian Researches, Russian Federation The Ottoman-Russian War of 1877-78 Edited by Ömer Turan, Ankara 2007 - pp. 221-226 The Russian-Turkish War of 1877-1878 was the largest military conflict of the second half of the XIX century in the region of Europe and Caucasus. It broke up 13 years later the ending of the Caucasian war and did not involve the territory of Adygheya (Circassia) but still had the most direct relation to Adygheyan people whose greater part to the moment of the conflict’s beginning lived on the lands of the European Turkey and Western Anatolia. The conflict between Turkey and Russia during that period had inevitable character for several reasons: 1) as continuation of the expansionist policies of the Russian Empire in the region of the Black sea when the Tsar Cabinet openly started with the ideas of pan-Slavism and transformation of the Black sea into internal lake of the Russian Empire; 2) because of the Bulgarian crisis of 1875-1876 that had caused a sharp aggravation of the Russian-Turkish relationship; and 3) in connection with some aspirations of Petersburg to rise above its defeat in the Crimean (Eastern) war. Ripening of the new conflict seemed to be obvious right after the end of the Crimean war: many Russian dignitaries and generals – Evdokimov, Milyutin, Bariatinsky, and others – wrote about it after 1857. In that connection the role of Circassia as the most probable battlefield between Turkey (supported by the Western countries) and Russia was extremely important.
    [Show full text]