The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania in the Name of the Republic of Lithuania

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania in the Name of the Republic of Lithuania Case no 3/2018 THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA IN THE NAME OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA RULING ON THE COMPLIANCE OF THE RESOLUTION (NO XIII-1022) OF THE SEIMAS OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA OF 12 JANUARY 2018 ON FORMING AN AD HOC INVESTIGATION COMMISSION OF THE SEIMAS OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA AND MANDATING IT TO CONDUCT A PARLIAMENTARY INVESTIGATION INTO THE MANAGEMENT OF THE LITHUANIAN NATIONAL RADIO AND TELEVISION AND ITS FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES (AS AMENDED ON 20 SEPTEMBER 2018) WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA 16 May 2019, no KT14-N6/2019 Vilnius The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, composed of the Justices of the Constitutional Court: Elvyra Baltutytė, Gintaras Goda, Vytautas Greičius, Danutė Jočienė, Gediminas Mesonis, Vytas Milius, Daiva Petrylaitė, Janina Stripeikienė, and Dainius Žalimas The court reporter – Daiva Pitrėnaitė Andrius Kubilius and Mykolas Majauskas, members of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, acting as representatives of a group of members of the Seimas, the petitioner Agnė Širinskienė, the Chair of the Committee on Legal Affairs of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, acting as the representative of the Seimas, the party concerned The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, pursuant to Articles 102 and 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania and Article 1 of the Law on the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, at the hearing of the Court on 16 April 2019, considered, under oral procedure, constitutional justice case no 3/2018 subsequent to the petition (no 1B-3/2018) of a group of members of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, the petitioner, requesting an investigation into whether the resolution (No XIII-1022) of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania of 12 January 2018 on forming an ad hoc investigation commission of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania and 2 mandating it to conduct a parliamentary investigation into the management of the Lithuanian National Radio and Television and its financial and economic activities is in conflict with Article 25 of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania and the constitutional principle of a state under the rule of law. The Constitutional Court has established: I The arguments of the petitioner 1. The petition of the group of members of the Seimas, the petitioner, is based on these main arguments. According to Article 1 of the resolution (No XIII-1022) of the Seimas of 12 January 2018 on forming an ad hoc investigation commission of the Seimas and mandating it to conduct a parliamentary investigation into the management of the Lithuanian National Radio and Television and its financial and economic activities (as amended on 20 September 2018) (hereinafter also referred to as the resolution of the Seimas of 12 January 2018), an ad hoc investigation commission of the Seimas was established, which had to perform an important function of exercising control over the activity of the national public broadcaster, i.e. to conduct an investigation into its management and its financial and economic activities. The exclusive constitutional mission of the Lithuanian National Radio and Television (hereinafter referred to as the LRT) is defined in a number of articles of the Constitution, in particular in Article 25 thereof, which guarantees the human right to have one’s own convictions and freely express them and the right to seek, receive, or impart information and ideas unhindered, as well as in the preamble to the Constitution, which enshrines the striving for an open, just, and harmonious civil society and a state under the rule of law. The constitutional mission of the public broadcaster presupposes, among other things, its independence from interference with its activity by public authorities, officials, and other persons. Thus, the independence of the LRT can be guaranteed only by ensuring that public authorities and officials do not interfere with the activities of the LRT. The activity of the national public broadcaster must be controlled in accordance with the model of control over its activity, where that model must be established by means of the law defining the activity of the national public broadcaster. The official constitutional doctrine states who is not allowed to exercise control over the activity of the national public broadcaster: persons who themselves are related to the national public broadcaster by official, property, or financial links or are dependent on it in one way or another, or who themselves have interests related to the activity of the national public broadcaster, or who belong to the interest groups (also institutionalised ones) that have precisely such interests. 3 According to the petitioner, the setting up of the Commission is a way of controlling the activity of the national public broadcaster and such control must not violate the independence of the national public broadcaster, which would be violated if such control were carried out by the persons who themselves have their own interests related to the activity of the national public broadcaster, or who belong to the interest groups (also institutionalised ones) that have precisely such interests. As one of the important tasks of the national public broadcaster is to provide objective coverage of the major events in the state, to provide information on the activities of the most important public authorities (the President of the Republic of Lithuania, the Government of the Republic of Lithuania, the Seimas, the political parties, the courts, other most important institutions), it is clear that the members of the Seimas and representatives of political parties fall into the category of persons who are not allowed to exercise control over the activities of the national public broadcaster, otherwise, the independence of the national public broadcaster would be violated. Consequently, according to the provisions of the official constitutional doctrine, the Commission, which was mandated to exercise control over the activity of the national public broadcaster, could not be formed from members of the Seimas, and the resolution of the Seimas of 12 January 2018, which formed such a Commission, is in conflict with Article 25 of the Constitution and the constitutional principle of the rule of law. II The arguments of the representatives of the party concerned 2. In the course of the preparation of the case for the hearing of the Constitutional Court, written explanations by Agnė Širinskienė, the Chair of the Committee of the Seimas on Legal Affairs, and Ona Buišienė, a senior adviser at the Legal Department of the Office of the Seimas, were received, in which they maintain that the impugned resolution of the Seimas of 12 January 2018 is not in conflict with the Constitution. 2.1. The position of Agnė Širinskienė, the Chair of the Committee of the Seimas on Legal Affairs, a representative of the Seimas, the party concerned, regarding the constitutionality of the resolution of the Seimas of 12 January 2018, is based on the following main arguments. 2.1.1. According to the provisions of the Republic of Lithuania’s Law on the National Radio and Television, the Seimas considers the annual report of the LRT Council. The annual activity report for 2016, submitted by the LRT Council, to the extent that it related to the use of the LRT budget funds and the LRT management, was incomplete and sketchy: it was unclear to the members of the Seimas how the LRT uses the funds allocated to it by the state and how the management of the LRT is organised. Therefore, a group of members of the Seimas twice approached the LRT with a request for certain information, but the LRT refused to provide some of the requested information due to confidentiality and some of the information provided was incomplete. 4 Precisely because the members of the Seimas had not received detailed information and explanations from the LRT regarding the LRT activity and how it used its budget funds, the Seimas was not able to fulfil its duty, when considering the annual report submitted by the LRT Council, to carry out parliamentary control, among other things, the Seimas was unable to properly assess the execution of the LRT budget, the use of the LRT funds, the application of the Law on the LRT and other legal acts governing the LRT management, and its financial and economic activities. For these reasons, a decision was made to set up an ad hoc investigation commission of the Seimas for conducting a parliamentary investigation into the management of the LRT and its financial and economic activities, which, under the Republic of Lithuania’s Law on Ad Hoc Investigation Commissions of the Seimas, has wider powers than a group of members of the Seimas. 2.1.2. The LRT is a state-owned public establishment. The LRT is provided funding from the state budget – funds allocated to the LRT are indicated in a separate line of the state budget. Item 14 of Article 67 of the Constitution consolidates the constitutional function of the Seimas to approve the state budget and supervise its execution. This function of the Seimas is imperative. There are no provided exceptions when the Seimas may refuse to carry it out, nor are there any specified circumstances under which the Seimas has no right to perform parliamentary control actions regarding specific legal entities financed from the state budget funds, where those actions are related to the use of the allocated budget funds. Thus, the way the LRT, a state-owned public establishment, to which the state has ensured financing from the state budget funds, uses these funds, as well as the way it carries out economic and financial activities, and organises the related management of the establishment, is subject to parliamentary control, which is in line with the powers of the Seimas defined in Item 14 of Article 67 of the Constitution.
Recommended publications
  • BARACKAS OBAMA: TRIMATIS SPAUSDINIMAS DERAMASI DĖL PINIGŲ 16 P
    ATOMINIAME PROJEKTE BARACKAS OBAMA: TRIMATIS SPAUSDINIMAS DERAMASI DĖL PINIGŲ 16 p. TREJI NUSIVYLIMO METAI 30 p. ŽADA GAMYBOS REVOLIUCIJĄ 46 p. 4,99 Lt www.veidas.lt 2011 spalio 31 Nr. 44 BRONISLOVAS LUBYS in memoriam Nr. 44, 2011 m. spalio 31–lapkriãio 6 d. TURINYS Savaitės interviu „Praradome pakabą, LIETUVA ant kurios žmonės galėtų EKSPRESAS SAVAITĖ . .8–11 kabinti vertybes“, – SENTENCIJOS . .13 mano Dominikonų SAVAITĖS INTERVIU: „Praradome pakabą, ant kurios ordino vienuolis brolis žmonės galėtų kabinti vertybes“, – mano Dominikonų Pijus Eglinas OP ordino vienuolis brolis Pijus Eglinas OP . .14 ENERGETIKA: atominiame projekte deramasi dėl pinigų . .16 TYRIMAS: Lietuvos TVF fobija paremta ir mitais . .18 PINIGAI: valstybės 2012 m. piniginė: ką rodo visų 14 p. biudžetų skaičiai . .20 A.UFARTO "BFL" NUOTR. VERSLAS VIRŠELIO TEMA: B.Lubys dar nesitikėjo išeiti . .22 Privačiuose Lietuvos PASAULIS medicinos KAIMYNAI: Latvijos vyriausybė – pasmerkta? . .28 KATASTROFOS: stichijos atskleidė silpnąsias centruose valstybių puses . 29 lankosi jau JAV: treji nusivylimo Baracku Obama metai . 30 trečdalis VISUOMENĖ pacientų. ISTORIJA: Interpolas svastikos voratinklyje . .32 TEMA: privačiuose Lietuvos medicinos centruose lankosi jau trečdalis pacientų . .34 34 p. SVEIKATA: privati medicina gydo sveikatos apsaugos “VEIDO” ARCHYVO NUOTR. sistemos skaudulius . .38 MAISTAS: Vilniuje plinta sveiko maisto restoranai . .43 MOKSLAS: trimatis spausdinimas žada gamybos Vilniuje plinta sveiko maisto restoranai revoliuciją . .46 TECHNOLOGIJOS: karuose dėl idėjų naudojamos bet Vilniuje po truputį atsiranda netradicinių kokios priemonės . .48 restoranų – viename siūlomas termiškai neapdorotas maistas, kitame svečius sutinka ir pakalbina patys šeimininkai, KULTŪRA trečiame kėdes atstoja pagalvėlės ant žemės, o įeiti į salę galima tik PROFILIS: „Nemaukite visų ant bendro kurpalio“, – nusiavus batus. aukštojo mokslo optimizatorių prašo Vilniaus dailės akademijos rektorius A.Klimas .
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Religion to Be Recognized by a State
    Defining religion to be recognized by a state The case of neo-pagan community “Romuva“ in Lithuania Lukrecijus Tubys Master thesis Religion, conflict and dialogue programme Faculty of Theology Helsinki University 2020 2 3 Tiedekunta – Fakultet – Faculty Koulutusohjelma – Utbildingsprogram – Degree Theology Programme Religion, conflict and dialogue Tekijä – Författare – Author Lukrecijus Tubys Työn nimi – Arbetets titel – Title Defining religion to be recognized by a state. The case of neo-pagan community “Romuva“ in Lithuania Oppiaine/Opintosuunta – Läroämne/Studieinriktning – Subject/Study track Työn laji – Arbetets art – Level Aika – Datum – Month Sivumäärä – Sidoantal – Number of Masters and year 11, 2020 pages ​82 4 Tiivistelmä – Referat – Abstract Lithuanian neo-pagan community “Romuva” approached the Lithuanian parliament to grant it state’s recognition. According to the Ministry of Justice, the religious community met all necessary requirements – it has been registered for 25 years, its customs and creeds do not contradict law and morals, and it has support in the society. However, the Lithuanian parliament voted against granting the new status. This thesis aims on how was the legal recognition of the “Romuva” argued for and against in the public media and the Lithuanian parliament and what kind of understanding of neo-paganism in particular and religion in general was constructed in these arguments. To achieve the goal two sets of data were analyzed: all articles related with “Romuva” recognition appeared on the most popular as well as pro-christian and pro-romuvian media sites from 2018-2020. Also public records from the Lithuanian parliament during submission and consideration phases, letters to parliamentarians. The data was also structured in a timeline to track the development of arguments.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 2021. No. 2
    News Agency on Conservative Europe Report 2021. No. 2. Report on conservative and right wing Europe January 20, 2021 GERMANY 1. DW.com Germany 2021: 1. Fighting COVID and replacing Angela Merkel (translated) What will define Germany in 2021? The fight against the coronavirus pandemic? Or rather the political battles as the country faces several elections — and the task to replace Chancellor Angela Merkel. At the moment, nothing in Germany is more important than the coronavirus pandemic, and that's likely to remain so in the new year. Resistance is growing to the curbs on individual freedoms brought about by rules made to combat COVID-19. "A social movement is brewing, in which right-wing and left-wing extremists, but also esotericists and science deniers, are gathering," political scientist Florian Hartleb told DW. 2 Seven elections The balancing act between protecting public health and people's rights to freedom will also influence elections, and there are plenty of those in Germany in 2021.Citizens will head to the polls in six of Germany's 16 states. In Baden-Württemberg, popular Premier Winfried Kretschmann — the first and only state premier from the environmentalist Green party — is standing for reelection in March. April will be interesting in Thuringia, where Bodo Ramelow is currently the sole state premier from the Left party.In Saxony-Anhalt, it will be decided, at the latest, by the election in June whether the troubled coalition of the conservative Christian Democrats, center-left Social Democrats, and Greens will endure.But the most important election of the year won't be until September — the federal election, when the era of Chancellor Angela Merkel is set to come to an end.
    [Show full text]
  • Vilniaus Universitetas TARPTAUTINIŲ SANTYKIŲ IR POLITIKOS MOKSLŲ INSTITUTAS
    Vilniaus universitetas TARPTAUTINIŲ SANTYKIŲ IR POLITIKOS MOKSLŲ INSTITUTAS Politikos mokslų bakalauro programa Bakalauro darbas GIEDRĖ ULYTĖ IV kurso, 2 grupės studentė DAUGYBINĖS PILIETYBĖS KONCEPTAI LIETUVOS RESPUBLIKOS SEIME BAKALAURO DARBAS Darbo vadovė: Prof. Natalija Arlauskaitė Vilnius, 2019 Bakalauro darbo vadovės išvados dėl darbo gynimo: ................................................................................................................................................................ ................................................................................................................................................................ ................................................................................................................ ................ ................................................. ........................ (data) (v., pavardė) (parašas) Bakalauro darbas įteiktas gynimo komisijai: .............. ........................................................................ (data) (Gynimo komisijos sekretorės parašas) Bakalauro darbo recenzentas: ........................................................................... (v., pavardė) Bakalauro darbų gynimo komisijos įvertinimas: ................................................................................................................................................ Komisijos pirmininkas: Komisijos nariai: 1 PATVIRTINIMAS APIE ATLIKTO DARBO SAVARANKIŠKUMĄ Patvirtiname, kad įteikiamas darbas (Daugybinės pilietybės konceptai Lietuvos
    [Show full text]
  • Worldreginfo - 9483D6aa-Ef8d-43E9-96Db-86418477A4cf
    WorldReginfo - 9483d6aa-ef8d-43e9-96db-86418477a4cf AB RYTŲ SKIRSTOMIEJI TINKLAI CONSOLIDATED AND COMPANY’S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2009 PREPARED ACCORDING TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS, AS ADOPTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION PRESENTED TOGETHER WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT AND CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT 1 WorldReginfo - 9483d6aa-ef8d-43e9-96db-86418477a4cf CONTENTS Page INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT 3 - 4 CONSOLIDATED AND COMPANY’S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION 5 STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 6 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY 7 - 8 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 9 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 10 - 4 6 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT 47 - 113 WorldReginfo - 9483d6aa-ef8d-43e9-96db-86418477a4cf WorldReginfo - 9483d6aa-ef8d-43e9-96db-86418477a4cf WorldReginfo - 9483d6aa-ef8d-43e9-96db-86418477a4cf WorldReginfo - 9483d6aa-ef8d-43e9-96db-86418477a4cf Statement of comprehensive income GROUP COMPANY Note 2009 2008 Note 2009 Revenue 1 163 245 1 194 218 1 160 346 1 190 962 Other income 25 45 - - Electricity purchased (563 494) (549 392) (563 494) (549 392) Electricity transmission service expense (159 425) (166 073) (159 424) (166 073) Depreciation and amortisation 4, 5, 15 (250 418) (286 495) (245 496) (279 170) Employee benefits and related social security 20 (109 174) (140 819) (90 672) (109 147) contributions Repair and maintenance expense (29 073) (43 969) (44 531) (63 446) Transportation expense (1 932) (1 518) (9 544) (14 193) Effect of revaluation of property, plant and 4 (72 880) (47 927) (69
    [Show full text]
  • Lietuvos Respublikos Seimas Nutarimas Dėl Lietuvos
    LIETUVOS RESPUBLIKOS SEIMAS NUTARIMAS DĖL LIETUVOS RESPUBLIKOS SEIMO BIUDŽETO IR FINANSŲ KOMITETO ATLIKTO PARLAMENTINIO TYRIMO DĖL VIETINIŲ IR REGIONINIŲ VEIKSNIŲ IR APLINKYBIŲ, LĖMUSIŲ 2009–2010 METŲ KRIZĖS LIETUVOJE REIŠKINIUS IR VIEŠŲJŲ FINANSŲ BŪKLĘ, ĮSKAITANT VIEŠOJO SEKTORIAUS SKOLOS DYDĮ IR ŠIOS SKOLOS VALDYMO SĄNAUDAS, IŠVADOS 2020 m. birželio 4 d. Nr. XIII-3013 Vilnius Lietuvos Respublikos Seimas n u t a r i a: 1 straipsnis. Pritarti Lietuvos Respublikos Seimo Biudžeto ir finansų komiteto atlikto parlamentinio tyrimo dėl vietinių ir regioninių veiksnių ir aplinkybių, lėmusių 2009–2010 metų krizės Lietuvoje reiškinius ir viešųjų finansų būklę, įskaitant viešojo sektoriaus skolos dydį ir šios skolos valdymo sąnaudas, išvadai (pridedama). Seimo Pirmininkas Viktoras Pranckietis PRITARTA Lietuvos Respublikos Seimo 2020 m. birželio 4 d. nutarimu Nr. XIII-3013 LIETUVOS RESPUBLIKOS SEIMO BIUDŽETO IR FINANSŲ KOMITETO ATLIKTO PARLAMENTINIO TYRIMO DĖL VIETINIŲ IR REGIONINIŲ VEIKSNIŲ IR APLINKYBIŲ, LĖMUSIŲ 2009–2010 METŲ KRIZĖS LIETUVOJE REIŠKINIUS IR VIEŠŲJŲ FINANSŲ BŪKLĘ, ĮSKAITANT VIEŠOJO SEKTORIAUS SKOLOS DYDĮ IR ŠIOS SKOLOS VALDYMO SĄNAUDAS, IŠVADA Lietuvos Respublikos Seimo Biudžeto ir finansų komitetas (toliau – Komitetas) Lietuvos Respublikos Seimo pavedimu laikinosios tyrimo komisijos teisėmis atliko parlamentinį tyrimą dėl vietinių ir regioninių veiksnių ir aplinkybių, lėmusių 2009–2010 metų krizės Lietuvoje reiškinius ir viešųjų finansų būklę, įskaitant viešojo sektoriaus skolos dydį ir šios skolos valdymo sąnaudas (toliau – parlamentinis tyrimas). 1. Komiteto įgaliojimų pagrindas. Lietuvos Respublikos Seimo 2018 m. kovo 29 d. nutarimas Nr. XIII-1065 „Dėl pavedimo Lietuvos Respublikos Seimo Biudžeto ir finansų komitetui atlikti parlamentinį tyrimą dėl vietinių ir regioninių veiksnių ir aplinkybių, lėmusių 2009–2010 metų krizės Lietuvoje reiškinius ir viešųjų finansų būklę, įskaitant viešojo sektoriaus skolos dydį ir šios skolos valdymo sąnaudas“ (toliau – Seimo nutarimas Nr.
    [Show full text]