Confronting Fiji Futures

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Confronting Fiji Futures CONFRONTING FIJI FUTURES EDITED BY A. HAROON AKRAM-LODHI Published by ANU eView The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at eview.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Confronting Fiji futures / A Haroon Akram-Lodhi (editor). ISBN: 9781921934292 (paperback) 9781921934308 (ebook) Subjects: Fiji--Politics and government. Fiji--Economic conditions. Fiji--Social conditions. Other Creators/Contributors: Akram-Lodhi, A. Haroon (Agha Haroon), 1958- editor. Dewey Number: 320.099611 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover photograph by M M (padmanaba01): www.flickr.com/photos/43423301@N07/3997565309/ First published 2000 by Asia Pacific Press This edition © 2016 ANU eView Stop Press Confronting the Present: The Coup of May 2000 A Haroon Akram-Lodhi On 19 May 2000, as With widespread doubt community politics that it ConfrontingFiji Futures went about who was in charge of suggested was not universal. to press, a group of 7 men the country, the Great It can be argued that the armed with machine guns Council of Chiefs met. On25 failure of the senior entered the Parliamentary May, following an intensely members of the government Complex in Suva. They took divided meeting, the council to recognise and seek to the Prime Minister, authorised the President to strengthen the fragility of Mahendra Chaudhry, establish, pending the the political consensus members of the Cabinet, and release of the hostages and helped create a climate that other members of the Fiji the resignation of the Prime made the coup possible. Labour Party-led People's Minister, a new interim Even backbenchers and Coalition Government administration drawn from grassroots members within hostage, including Ganesh a council of advisers. the indigenous Fijian parties Chand, a contributor to this Although common law was that formed part of the book. A previously little­ used to justify the Coalition did not support known figure, George authorisation, the suggested the 1997 constitutional Speight, took responsibility arrangements were clearly settlement, or did so for the attempted coup, extra-constitutional. Speight grudgingly. It would appear stating that he had assumed rejected the arrangements. that the rapid movement executive power in order to The coup is an demonstrated by the represent the interests of unfortunate reminder of the government at times on indigenous Fijians. It was salience of the issues raised sensitive issues was an later revealed that rogue in Confronting Fiji Futures. unnecessarily dangerous elements within the Fiji Robbie Robertson argues course of action. Rapid Military Forces' Counter that Fiji has witnessed only movement on sensitive Revolutionary Warfare Unit a partial retreat from the issues overrode the positive were directing the attempted exclusionary communalism achievements of the coup . Indigenous Fijian that shaped the politics of government, such as the youths rampaged through the country in the aftermath maintenance of macro­ Suva and other of the 1987 coups, despite economic stability. It communities, smashing the achievements of the 1997 overrode a number of major windows, looting shops, Constitution and the 1999 policies to assist the poor, setting fire to buildings, and elections. The limited extent significantly Fijians. It terrorising their fellow of this partial retreat has helped create the ground citizens. Despite the been vividly illustrated by upon which the Ta ukei declaration of a state of the coup, which has also movement could be revived, emergency by the President, illustrated, as both Yash and the politics of exclusion Ratu Sir Kamisese Mara, the Ghai and Satendra Prasad resurrected as a viable police and the army seemed note in this book, that political strategy. unable to contain the support for the 1997 violence. Constitution and the cross- Land is a particularly indigenous Fijian interests in Fiji in 1987. The most sensitive issue. Indigenous Fiji could take place. important social cleavage in Fijians own the land, but it Historically, communalism Fiji now lies within the is worked by Indo-Fijians. has been a viable political indigenous Fijian com­ The government had been strategy to maintain the munity, demonstrated at seeking to deal with the fa<;adeof unity in the face of length by the contributors to issue of land during its term difference, as the events of this book. Differences of of office. Biman Prasad and May 2000 demonstrate. status, region, and class Sunil Kumar examine the The irony is that the have fostered conflict within complexity of the issue here. presumed homogeneity of the indigenous Fijian com­ Speight has made it clear the indigenous Fijian munity, and it is this conflict that indigenous Fijians community is now very which explains the origins of wanted 'their' land back. much a fiction. Social the coup, an expression of The land issue is seen by inequality occurs not just attempts within the many indigenous Fijians as between communities; it indigenous Fijian com­ the answer to the economic occurs within them. The munity to establish political backwardness and social contributions by Holger ascendancy. In particular, exclusion faced by some Korth, Steven Ratuva, the coup has witnessed the within their community­ William Sutherland and indigenous Fijian nouveaux the 'Fijian question' Robbie Robertson demon­ riches that emerged, as (William Sutherland). Yet, as strate the sharp social, described by Steven Ratuva, Sutherland makes clear, economic and geographical out of the economic affir­ land will not resolve the differentiation that has mative action policies since Fijian question. During the occurred within the 1987 come into conflict with course of the 1990s the Fiji indigenous Fijian com­ the economically connected state undertook an extensive munity since 1987. While aristocracy that ruled Fiji program of structural some have prospered, many between 1970 and 1992. Both reform, examined in detail in have not, and the result of groups have used indi­ this volume. A central these economic differences genous Fijian nationalism in component was economic has been a fracturing of the an effort to unite themselves affirmative action for the culture of the indigenous with the indigenous Fijian benefit of the indigenous Fijian community. Add to community from which they Fijian community as a whole this the difficulties described have become increasingly but which, as is documented by Robertson in even cut off. It is the deepening by Steven Ratuva, ended up defining an indigenous recognition of social cleavage benefiting a minority within Fijian. The leader of the coup within the indigenous Fijian the indigenous Fijian embodies the contradictions. community that has led community. Structural Speight, who is of more indigenous Fijians to reform and economic indigenous Fijian and Euro­ accept the basic multiethnic affirmative action stood in Fijian parentage, isa foreign­ and multicultural reality of contradiction, and the result, educated failed businessman their country than at any as discussed in different who both benefited from the time in its history. It is these ways in the contributions by economic affirmative action people who, along with the John Cameron, Jacqueline policies of previous govern­ members of the other Leckie, Sepehri and Akram­ ments while at the same time communities of Fiji, tried to Lodhi, Chand, Sutherland, being unable to navigate the oppose the coup. Indeed, it Robertson and Ratuva, was treacherous waters of is the extent of the a deepening of social structural reform. He is an opposition to the coup inequality. This created the atypical indigenous Fijian. across the communities of material circumstances in As stressed by Martin Fiji that can give rise to a which a violent reassertion Doornbos and Haroon guardedly cautious opti­ of what Simione Durutalo Akram-Lodhi, Fiji in 2000 is mism as Fiji confronts its termed the 'paramountcy' of a very different country from futures. Contents Contributors x Preface A Haroon Akram-Lodhi xii Part I: Politics, economics and social inequality 1 1. Introduction: Confronting the future, confronting the past Martin Doornbosand A Haroon Akram-Lodhi 3 2. The implementation of the Fiji Islands Constitution Yash Ghai 21 3. Fiji's 1999 general elections: outcomes and prospects Satendra Prasad 50 4. Fiji's economy: the challenge of the future Ardeshir Sepehri and A Haroon Akram-Lodhi 71 5. Institutional rigidities and economic performance in Fiji Biman Prasad and Sunil Kumar 111 6. Confronting social policy challenges in Fiji John Cameron 133 7. Labour market deregulation in Fiji Ganesh Chand 152 8. Women in post-coup Fiji: negotiating work through old and new realities Jacqueline Leckie 178 Part II: The 'Fijian' question 203 9. The problematics of reform and the 'Fijian' question William Sutherland 205 10. Addressing inequality? Economic affirmative action and communal capitalism in post-coup Fiji Steven Ratuva 226 11. Ecotourism and the politics of representation in Fiji Holger Korth 249 12. Retreat from exclusion? Identities in post-coup Fiji Robbie Robertson 269 References 293 Index 310 Tables Table 3.1 1999 election results for 'Fijian communal seats' 59 Table 3.2 1999 election results in the open seats 62 Table 3.3 Party representation in Cabinet after the 1999 elections 65 Table 4.1 Selected macroeconomic indicators, 1971-96 73 Table 4.2 Specification of the three-gap model 92 Table 4.3 Econometric results of the structural equations and the three-gap equations 96 Table 4.4 Projected growth path scenarios, 1997-2001 102 Table 5.1 Categories of land ownership in Fiji 118 Table 5.2 Land use classification in per cent, 1965 and 1978 119 Table 5.3 Sugarcane production in the Labasa mill area, 1986-95 120 Table 5.4 Percentage of Inda-Fijian and indigenous Fijian farmers in the Seaqaqa project, 1981-93 121 Table 5.5 Classification of native land in Fiji 122 Table 5.
Recommended publications
  • Confronting Fiji Futures
    CONFRONTING FIJI FUTURES EDITED BY A. HAROON AKRAM-LODHI Published by ANU eView The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at eview.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Confronting Fiji futures / A Haroon Akram-Lodhi (editor). ISBN: 9781921934292 (paperback) 9781921934308 (ebook) Subjects: Fiji--Politics and government. Fiji--Economic conditions. Fiji--Social conditions. Other Creators/Contributors: Akram-Lodhi, A. Haroon (Agha Haroon), 1958- editor. Dewey Number: 320.099611 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover photograph by M M (padmanaba01): www.flickr.com/photos/43423301@N07/3997565309/ First published 2000 by Asia Pacific Press This edition © 2016 ANU eView Stop Press Confronting the Present: The Coup of May 2000 A Haroon Akram-Lodhi On 19 May 2000, as With widespread doubt community politics that it ConfrontingFiji Futures went about who was in charge of suggested was not universal. to press, a group of 7 men the country, the Great It can be argued that the armed with machine guns Council of Chiefs met. On25 failure of the senior entered the Parliamentary May, following an intensely members of the government Complex in Suva. They took divided meeting, the council to recognise and seek to the Prime Minister, authorised the President to strengthen the fragility of Mahendra Chaudhry, establish, pending the the political consensus members of the Cabinet, and release of the hostages and helped create a climate that other members of the Fiji the resignation of the Prime made the coup possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Coup Coup Land: the Press and the Putsch in Fiji
    Asia Pacific Media ducatE or Issue 10 Article 16 1-2001 Coup coup land: The press and the putsch in Fiji D. Robie University of the South Pacific, Fiji Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/apme Recommended Citation Robie, D., Coup coup land: The press and the putsch in Fiji, Asia Pacific Media ducatE or, 10, 2001, 148-162. Available at:https://ro.uow.edu.au/apme/vol1/iss10/16 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Coup Coup Land: The Press And The Putsch In Fiji On 19 May 2000, an insurrection led by failed businessman George Speight and seven renegade members of the élite 1st Meridian Squadron special forces engulfed the Fiji Islands in turmoil for the next three months. Speight and his armed co-conspirators stormed Parliament and seized the Labour-led Mahendra Chaudhry Government hostage for 56 days. On Chaudhry’s release from captivity, he partly blamed the media for the overthrow of his government. Some sectors of the media were accused of waging a bitter campaign against the Fiji Labour Party-led administration and its rollback of privatisation. In the early weeks of the insurrection, the media enjoyed an unusually close relationship with Speight and the hostage-takers, raising ethical questions. Dilemmas faced by Fiji and foreign journalists were more complex than during the 1987 military coups. As Fiji faces a fresh general election in August, this article examines the reportage of the Coalition Government’s year in office, media issues over coverage of the putsch, and a controversy over the author’s analysis presented at a Journalism Education Association (JEA) conference in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • WILLIAMS COLLEGE LIBRARIES Your Unpublished Thesis, Submitted
    WILLIAMS COLLEGE LIBRARIES Your unpublished thesis, submitted for a degree at Williams College and administered by the Williams College Libraries, will be made available for research use. You may, through this form, provide instructions regarding copyright, access, dissemination and reproduction of your thesis. _ The faculty advisor to the student writing the thesis wishes to claim joint authorship in this work. In each section, please check the ONE statement that reflects your wishes. 1. PUBLICATION AND QUOTATION: LITERARY PROPERTY RIGHTS A student author automatically owns the copyright to his/her work, whether or not a copyright symbol and date are placed on the piece. The duration of U.S. copyright on a manuscript--and Williams theses are considered manuscripts--is the life of the author plus 70 years. _ I/we do not choose to retain literary property rights to the thesis, and I wish to assign them immediately to Williams College. ;,de('tlni~ this wili tn the lln~ III 1,0 '.\.n \tudem lunhor from later pUf!lishirig his/her \vorl-;: the studem would, however. need to contact the Archi ves for a form. 'rhe Archi ves wOllk! be li\~e ill this lU abo grant pel'nll\S!On small sections fruln the thesis. would thcr(~ be Hny iTl.hon for tlk /\rchives to gnm1 pe!.·IHI:SS!O!l to another party IU tlh~ thesis in its if sueh a situation amse. the Archive,; would in touch \\ith the mnhor to let them know that such request had heeu madt\ L~we wish to retain literary property rights to the thesis for a period of three years, at which time the literary property rights shall be assigned to Williams College.
    [Show full text]
  • In Exile at Home-A Fiji-Indian Story
    In Exile at Home-A Fiji-Indian Story Satish C. Rai Submitted in part fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Creati e Arts Copyright © 2010 by Satish Rai School of Humanities and Languages The (ni ersity )estern Sydney Sydney May 2011 Declaration I, Satish Rai, declare that the exegesis In Exile at Home-A Fiji-Indian Story is approximately 32,008 words in length including preface, notes, appendix, quotes and references. his thesis contains no material that has been previously submitted, in whole or in part, for the award of any other academic diploma or degree, except indicated otherwise. his thesis is my own work, based on the findings of my primary and secondary research which have been acknowledged. Signature.......................................... (Date) '''''''' Name: Satish Chand Rai Student ID No: 9,031,0. Statement by Super isor he research in this exegesis was performed under my supervision and to my knowledge is the sole work of Mr. Satish Rai. Signature.......................................... (Date) ''''''' Name'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''.. Designation''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' 2 ACK,O)L.D/M.,TS he candidature would not have been successfully completed without assistance from many people around the world and I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to all them. Naming all of these people is not possible but I would like to acknowledge the following individuals who were at the forefront with their assistance and without whom this thesis may not have been reali0ed. 1irstly, my heart2felt gratitude to Associate Professor 5udith Snodgrass, who provided much needed advice and guidance when the need was greatest. Professor Subramani is the only supervisor who supervised this candidature from its beginning to the end.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Concerning the Republic of the Fiji Islands
    SUBMISSION TO THE COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION CONCERNING THE REPUBLIC OF THE FIJI ISLANDS Endorsed by three Fiji Non-Government Organisations AUGUST 2007 NGOs Submission to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination concerning Fiji CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND SHORT FORMS .............................................................0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................2 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................4 1.1 About the NGO Coalition on Human Rights............................................4 1.2 Purpose and Scope of this Submission ..................................................4 1.3 Impact of Events Surrounding 5 December 2006 ...................................4 1.4 Recent History of Reporting by Fiji Under the Convention......................5 1.5 Issues Addressed in this Submission .....................................................7 2. PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT OF COUP LEADERS AND THE PROMOTION OF RECONCILIATION, TOLERANCE AND UNITY BILL 2005 .....9 2.1 Preferential Treatment: Identifying a Pattern ........................................10 2.2 Promotion of Reconciliation, Tolerance and Unity Bill 2005 .................12 2.3 State Party's Rationale for Reconciliation, tolerance and unity Bill. …...14 2.3 Conclusions on Preferential Treatment.................................................17 3. FAILURE TO FORM A MULTI-PARTY CABINET IN ACCORDANCE WITH
    [Show full text]
  • Chand, S., Clemens, M. Skilled Emigration and Skill Creation
    Working Paper Number 152 September 2008 Skilled Emigration and Skill Creation: A quasi-experiment By Satish Chand and Michael Clemens Abstract Does the emigration of highly-skilled workers deplete local human capital? The answer is not obvious if migration prospects induce human capital formation. We analyze a unique natural quasi-experiment in the Republic of the Fiji Islands, where political shocks have provoked one of the largest recorded exoduses of skilled workers from a developing country. Mass emigration began unexpectedly and has occurred only in a well-defined subset of the population, creating a treatment group that foresaw likely emigration and two different quasi-control groups that did not. We use rich census and administrative microdata to address a range of concerns about experimental validity. This allows plausible causal attribution of post-shock changes in human capital accumulation to changes in emigration patterns. We show that high rates of emigration by tertiary-educated Fiji Islanders not only raised investment in tertiary education in Fiji; they moreover raised the stock of tertiary educated people in Fiji—net of departures. The Center for Global Development is an independent, nonprofit policy research organization that is dedicated to reducing global poverty and inequality and to making globalization work for the poor. This paper was made possible in part by financial support from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the Australian Agency for International Development. Use and dissemination of this Working Paper is encouraged; however, reproduced copies may not be used for commercial purposes. Further usage is permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons License.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Capital Investment Under Exit Options: Evidence from a Natural Quasi- Experiment
    DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 12173 Human Capital Investment under Exit Options: Evidence from a Natural Quasi- Experiment Satish Chand Michael A. Clemens FEBRUARY 2019 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 12173 Human Capital Investment under Exit Options: Evidence from a Natural Quasi- Experiment Satish Chand University of New South Wales and ANU Michael A. Clemens Center for Global Development and IZA FEBRUARY 2019 Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. ISSN: 2365-9793 IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–9 Phone: +49-228-3894-0 53113 Bonn, Germany Email: [email protected] www.iza.org IZA DP No. 12173 FEBRUARY 2019 ABSTRACT Human Capital Investment under Exit Options: Evidence from a Natural Quasi- Experiment* Theory suggests that groups historically subject to discrimination, such as Jews, could exhibit traditionally high investment in education because discrimination spurred exit facilitated by human capital.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2006 Military Takeover in FIJI a Coup to End All Coups?
    The 2006 MiliTary Takeover in FiJi a Coup to end all Coups? The 2006 MiliTary Takeover in FiJi a Coup to end all Coups? Jon Fraenkel, Stewart Firth and Brij V. Lal (eds) State, Society and Governance in Melanesia Program Studies in State and Society in the Pacific, No. 4 Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/coup_coup_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: The 2006 military takeover in Fiji: a coup to end all coups? / editors, Stewart Firth, Jon Fraenkel, Brij V. Lal. ISBN: 9781921536502 (pbk.) 9781921536519 (pdf) Notes: Includes index. Subjects: Government, Resistance to--Fiji. Fiji--History--21st century. Fiji--Politics and government--21st century. Other Authors/Contributors: Firth, Stewart, 1944- Fraenkel, Jonathan. Lal, Brij V. Dewey Number: 996.11 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by Annie Di Nallo Design Copy editing by Wendy Tubman Cover photograph of Colonel Sitiveni Rabuka: Ian Mackley [ca 29 May 1987], reference number: EP/1987/2601. Dominion Post Collection, Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. Cover photographs of George Speight and Commodore Frank Bainimarama: AAP/AFP/ Torsten Blackwood. Printed by University Printing Services, ANU This edition © 2009 ANU E Press Table of Contents Acronyms and abbreviations vii Authors’ biographies xi Introduction 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Consequences of the Coup for the Fiji Labour Movement
    11. Heading for the scrap heap of history? The consequences of the coup for the Fiji labour movement Vijay Naidu During the period 2001±06, in between his repeated media skirmishes with Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase's government, the commander of the Republic of Fiji Military Forces (RFMF), Commodore Frank Bainimarama, proclaimed his intention to depose Qarase's Soqosoqo Duavata ni Lewenivanua (SDL) party from government.1 Even though Qarase had, for the first time, followed Fiji constitution's power-sharing provision, and established a multiparty government, with ministerial appointments for eight Fiji Labour Party (FLP) members of parliament, it was evident, from three very controversial bills, that Qarase continued to push an ethno-nationalist agenda; this was used by the Commodore as a justification for the coup. The interim administration, with Commodore Bainimarama as prime minister, has taken its authority and legitimacy from the Office of the President of the Republic of the Fiji Islands. Fiji is not a republic in the accepted meaning of the word; it does not denote sovereignty residing in the people of the nation. Under the constitution, the President of Fiji is nominated by the unelected Bose Levu Vakaturaga (Great Council of Chiefs or GCC). Paramountcy of ‘indigenous rights’ coups and the ‘clean-up’ coup Fiji's 2006 coup not only bestowed near-absolute sovereignty on Fiji's President, it also caused considerable confusion and angst among those who had previously supported the overthrow of legitimately elected governments. The coups of 1987 and 2000 had been justified by the perpetrators in terms of protecting and promoting indigenous Fijian interests against those of non-ethnic Fijian citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • 00 Upfront.Pmd
    postscript 11 Postscript Fiji went to the polls in mid May 2006, the tenth time since independence in 1970. In what was widely expected to be a contest marred by internal political fragmentation among indigenous Fijians and a surge of independents—18 political parties were registered on the eve of the elections and an unprecedented 68 independents contested—the elections delivered a result that defied most predictions. The ruling Soqosoqo Duavata Lewenivanua (SDL) party won 36 seats of the 71 seats in the House of Representatives, a clear win over rival Fijian parties. The Fiji Labour Party won 31 seats, its appeal far outweighing that of its long time rival the National Federation Party. The United Peoples Party and independents each winning two of the remaining four seats, the latter joining the government to boost its numbers. Of the total 479, 674 registered voters 256,014 (53.4 per cent) were Fijians, 204, 470 (42.6) were Indo-Fijians, 5,373 (1.1 per cent) were Rotumans, and 13,817 (2.9 per cent) were Generals (that is, all those not included in any of the other categories).1 The voter turnout, despite early fears to the contrary, was high: 87.7 per cent compared to 81 per cent in 2001. The turnout was uniformly higher among all ethnic groups: 90 per cent in Fijian provincial constituencies in 2006 compared to 82 per cent in 2001, 89 per cent among Indo-Fijians compared to 81 per cent in 2001, an increase of 10 per cent among Generals 73 per cent to 84 per cent and from 76.4 per cent to 88 per cent among Rotumans.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Advice Fiji FJI36559 – Fiji – Fiji Labour Party – New Labour Unity Party – Professor Rajesh Chandra 28 May 2010 1
    Country Advice Fiji FJI36559 – Fiji – Fiji Labour Party – New Labour Unity Party – Professor Rajesh Chandra 28 May 2010 1. Deleted. 2. Deleted. 3. Please provide information on Professor Rajesh Chandra and, in particular, any connection with the Fiji Labour Party or the current Fijian regime. Publicly available information found on Professor Rajesh Chandra relates primarily to his role as an academic, including his Vice Chancellorships of the University of the South Pacific (USP) and the University of Fiji. No information was found to indicate that Professor Chandra has had formal connections with either the Fiji Labour Party (FLP) or the current regime other then through his work as an academic and university administrator. In broadest overview of relevant events, Professor Chandra was controversially “overlooked” for appointment as the Vice Chancellor of the government-controlled USP immediately following the coup in May 2000 and again in 2004, before being appointed Vice Chancellor of the University of Fiji, which was newly founded to “provide a home for Indian students” in 2005. Since the current interim government came to power in 2007, Professor Chandra has reportedly been approached for consultations regarding the proposed People‟s Charter for Change, Peace and Progress, has succeeded in being appointed Vice Chancellor of the USP and has been appointed chairman of the Higher Education Commission. More detailed information regarding these events follows. Professor Chandra, already a senior USP administrator and academic, was recommended for appointment to the position of Vice Chancellor at a meeting of the USP Council at the time of the coup which ousted the government of Mahendra Chaudhry in May 2000, but the recommendation was rejected.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Hostage
    The 2000 Speight coup in Fiji: An analysis of the role of The Fiji Times and the impact of partisan media Thakur Ranjit Singh A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Communication Studies (MCS) School of Communication Studies Auckland University of Technology January 2011 Research abstract The 2000 Speight coup in Fiji: An analysis of the role of The Fiji Times and the impact of partisan media. In May 1999, Mahendra Pal Chaudhry was sworn in as the first Indo-Fijian Prime Minister of Fiji. A year later, an unruly protest march opposing his leadership climaxed in a renegade soldier-led attempted coup. The rebel Counter-Revolutionary Warfare soldiers led by a failed businessman, George Speight, took the elected Fiji government hostage. As was the case with the original coup d’état in May 1987, the Labour-led Indo–Fijian dominated coalition government’s term in office was cut short by Speight and his ethno-nationalist forces. The May 2000 attempted coup, the dissolution of Chaudhry government and the lack of popular uprising to support democracy have been partially attributed to an alleged irresponsible journalism which put considerable pressure on the fledgling first Indo- Fijian-led government. Claims have been made that the media, particularly The Fiji Times, played a critical role in this event through the way it portrayed Chaudhry and his government. Such reporting has been challenged as having contributed to racial animosity, leading to political disorder. This research, conducted through content analysis between May 1999 and May 2000 along with an examination of documents and the coup literature, seeks to explore any role The Fiji Times may have played leading to political instability, culminating in the putsch, seizure of the Parliament and eventual imprisonment of George Speight after his death sentence for treason was commuted to life in jail.
    [Show full text]