Government Hostage
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The 2000 Speight coup in Fiji: An analysis of the role of The Fiji Times and the impact of partisan media Thakur Ranjit Singh A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Communication Studies (MCS) School of Communication Studies Auckland University of Technology January 2011 Research abstract The 2000 Speight coup in Fiji: An analysis of the role of The Fiji Times and the impact of partisan media. In May 1999, Mahendra Pal Chaudhry was sworn in as the first Indo-Fijian Prime Minister of Fiji. A year later, an unruly protest march opposing his leadership climaxed in a renegade soldier-led attempted coup. The rebel Counter-Revolutionary Warfare soldiers led by a failed businessman, George Speight, took the elected Fiji government hostage. As was the case with the original coup d’état in May 1987, the Labour-led Indo–Fijian dominated coalition government’s term in office was cut short by Speight and his ethno-nationalist forces. The May 2000 attempted coup, the dissolution of Chaudhry government and the lack of popular uprising to support democracy have been partially attributed to an alleged irresponsible journalism which put considerable pressure on the fledgling first Indo- Fijian-led government. Claims have been made that the media, particularly The Fiji Times, played a critical role in this event through the way it portrayed Chaudhry and his government. Such reporting has been challenged as having contributed to racial animosity, leading to political disorder. This research, conducted through content analysis between May 1999 and May 2000 along with an examination of documents and the coup literature, seeks to explore any role The Fiji Times may have played leading to political instability, culminating in the putsch, seizure of the Parliament and eventual imprisonment of George Speight after his death sentence for treason was commuted to life in jail. The thesis discusses the performance of The Fiji Times in the context of a range of media theories and models in a developing nation and examines possible contributory factors in the fall of democracy and the one-year rule of the Chaudhry government. The author of this thesis also draws on his own personal experience in the Fiji news media as the publisher of one of Fiji’s three daily newspapers, Fiji’s Daily Post; as a columnist; as a political commentator and as an independent Hindi programme presenter for the public broadcaster, Fiji Broadcasting Corporation, during this turbulent period. i Statement of Source I declare that the work presented in this thesis is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, original and my own work, except as acknowledged in the text. It contains no material either in whole or part, submitted for a degree at this or any other University. .............................................. .............................................. Ranjit Singh 25 January 2011 ii Acknowledgements My first gratitude rests with my mentor who later went on to become my supervisor and a good friend, Associate Professor and Head of Pacific Media Centre, Dr David Robie, who encouraged me to apply for the AUT/PIMA Postgraduate Scholarship in Communication Studies, and has been my constant guide all along. I take this opportunity to also thank AUT and the Pacific Islands Media Association (PIMA) for considering me worthy of this scholarship which allowed me to fulfil my childhood ambition of acquiring a journalism qualification. My special thanks go to my lecturers at AUT’s Communication Studies Programme, including Dr Robie, Dr Alan Cocker, Dr Janet Bedggood, Dr Rosser Johnston and Brad Mercer for their direction and contributions in their attempts at polishing this rough diamond. Of course the Alexander Turnbull (National) Library in Wellington and the Macmillan Brown Library at University of Canterbury, Christchurch from where I collected my data shots of The Fiji Times newspaper need special mention. My gratitude to my nephews and niece-in-laws respectively, Kashmir Kaur and Ajay Singh and their families in Kelson, Lower Hutt and Roshni and Vijay Singh, with son Renan in Christchurch, for being my hosts during data collection. I also acknowledge the encouragement of others who I have used as sounding boards every now and then. My fellow media columnists, Subhash Appana and Rajendra Prasad, author of Tears in Paradise, were my constant guides. Sue Knox, the tutor in Long Documents has shown me the methods of formatting this thesis and its layout is result of her guide and coaching. My immediate family members, wife Shashi and children Ranjeet Roshan and Ragni, and son in law Ravi, who appreciated why this old fella, wished to get a second Masters, so late in life. Finally, I thank all my extended families and friends, who understood and appreciated my excuse of being busy with my thesis when I wished to avoid them. Of course, the overall responsibility and accountability of my research, including any errors and omissions, rests with me and me alone. iii Contents Research abstract ................................................................................................................ i Statement of Source .......................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... iii Table of Figures ............................................................................................................. viii List of Tables ................................................................................................................. xvi Terminologies, acronyms and abbreviations................................................................. xvii Map of Fiji ..................................................................................................................... xix Chronology ...................................................................................................................... xx PART I: A THEORETICAL BASE .............................................................................. xxiii Chapter 1: Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Mooloolaba Paper (MLP) - the genesis of allegations on The Fiji Times ... 2 1.2 Why this research and thesis? ............................................................................. 3 Chapter 2: Media Theories ................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Siebert et al.’s Four Theories of the Press .......................................................... 6 2.2 The Propaganda Model ..................................................................................... 15 2.3 Four World’s News Values model .................................................................... 19 2.4 Development Journalism .................................................................................. 23 Chapter 3: General Literature.......................................................................................... 30 3.1 Allegations of media bias in Fiji ....................................................................... 30 3.2 Chaudhry versus The Fiji Times ....................................................................... 32 3.3 Other critics of The Fiji Times .......................................................................... 33 3.4 The indigenous angle ........................................................................................ 35 3.5 The race card in Fiji media ............................................................................... 37 Chapter 4: Previous media research ................................................................................ 42 4.1 Lynda Duncan ................................................................................................... 42 4.2 Susan Sandhya Kiran ........................................................................................ 45 4.3 Padmini Gaunder .............................................................................................. 47 4.4 Nwomye Obini .................................................................................................. 49 4.5 Christine Gounder ............................................................................................. 50 4.6 Pramila Devi ..................................................................................................... 51 4.7 A summary of this chapter ................................................................................ 52 Chapter 5: Methodology ................................................................................................. 53 5.1 The literature ..................................................................................................... 53 Chapter 6: The research: Steps and direction of the content analysis ............................. 58 6.1 Research questions ............................................................................................ 58 6.2 Sampling strategy .............................................................................................. 58 6.3 Recording unit to depict direction and orientation ........................................... 58 iv 6.4 Categories for analysis ...................................................................................... 59 6.5 Interpretation and analysis ...............................................................................