Sephardic Approaches to Conversion 293 Richard Hidary 10

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sephardic Approaches to Conversion 293 Richard Hidary 10 Contents Contributors ix Series Editor’s Preface xiii Editors’ Introduction xv Adam Mintz and Marc D. Stern Part I: Intermarriage 1. Intermarriage in the Early Modern Period 3 Judith Bleich 2. Diagnosing Challenges to Contemporary Modern Orthodox Families 47 Sylvia Barack Fishman 3. Intermarriage and Jewish Communal Policy : Challenges to Orthodoxy 65 Steven Bayme Part II: Conversion in the State of Israel 4. From “Who Is a Jew” to “Who Should Be a Jew” : The Current Debates on Giyur in Israel 109 Arye Edrei 5. Giyur in the Context of National Identity 151 Chaim I. Waxman v vi Conversion, Intermarriage, and Jewish Identity Part III : History of Geirut 6. Conversion to Judaism in Tannaitic Halakhah 189 Lawrence H. Schiff man 7. Approaches to Conversion in Medieval European Rabbinic Literature : From Ashkenaz to Sefarad 217 Ephraim Kanarfogel Part IV: Current Contemporary Halakhic Approaches to Geirut 8. Modern-day Ashkenazi Psak regarding the Nullification of Conversion 261 Yosef Zvi Rimon 9. Sephardic Approaches to Conversion 293 Richard Hidary 10. Geirus Procedures and Standards Network 329 Yosef Blau Appendix B 345 11. The Contemporary Rabbinate and Conversion 347 Benjamin J. Samuels Part V: The Theological Foundations of Jewish Identity 12. “If You Were A Human Being” A Thought Experiment 385 Shalom Carmy Part VI: Orthodox Responses to New Paradigms of Jewishness 13. American Orthodox Responses to Intermarriage 409 Jonathan D. Sarna 14. The Jewish People – A Yawning Definitional Gap 427 Marc D. Stern 15. Actually Jewish : How Young American Jews See Their Status and How Orthodox Rabbis Respond 453 Yehuda Sarna List of Participants 479 Contributors Dr. Steven Bayme serves as director of AJC’s Koppelman Institute on American Jewish-Israeli Relations and Contemporary Jew- ish Life Department. He is currently a visiting professor of history at the Jewish Th eological Seminary. His most recent publications include co-editing (with Steven Katz) Continuity and Change: A Festschrift in Honor of Dr. Irving Greenberg, and co-authoring (with Manfred Gerstenfeld) American Jewry’s Comfort Level. Rabbi Yosef Blau is the senior mashgiach at Yeshiva University and its affi liated Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Th eological Seminary. He serves on the Manhattan Beit Din for Geirut as part of the GPS of the Rabbinical Council of America. Dr. Judith Bleich is professor of Judaic Studies at Touro Graduate School of Jewish Studies and the Lander College for Women in New York City. She has written extensively on modern Jew- ish history. Rabbi Shalom Carmy teaches Jewish Studies and philosophy at Yeshiva University, where he is co-chair of the Jewish Studies Executive at Yeshiva College. He is the editor of Tradition. Dr. Arye Edrei is professor of law at Tel Aviv University. Dr. Sylvia Barack Fishman is chair of the Near Eastern and Judaic Studies Department at Brandeis University. Th e author of seven books, Professor Fishman teaches courses on contem- porary Jewish life and is co-director of the Hadassah Brandeis Institute. ix x Conversion, Intermarriage, and Jewish Identity Dr. Richard Hidary is a graduate of Yeshiva University (1997), received semikha from Midrash Sefaradi in Jerusalem, and a PhD from New York University. He is an assistant professor of Judaic studies at Yeshiva University, Stern College for Women. He has published Dispute for the Sake of Heaven: Legal Plural- ism in the Talmud (Brown University Press, 2010), as well as articles appearing in AJS Review, Dine Israel, Encyclopedia Judaica, and Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception. Rabbi Robert S. Hirt (series editor of Th e Orthodox Forum Publica- tions), is vice president emeritus of the Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Th eological Seminary, an affi liate of Yeshiva University. Rabbi Hirt co-edited Shimon Huberband’s critically acclaimed book on the Holocaust, Kiddush Hashem: Jewish Religious and Cul- tural Life in Poland During the Holocaust, and has contributed to Tradition, Th e Journal of Orthodox Jewish Th ought, and other educational publications. Dr. Ephraim Kanarfogel is the E. Billi Ivry University Professor of Jewish History, Literature and Law at Yeshiva University. A fel- low of the American Academy for Jewish Research, Professor Kanarfogel is the author or editor of six books and a winner of the National Jewish Book Award. His most recent book, Th e Intellectual History and Rabbinic Culture of Medieval Ashkenaz, was awarded the prestigious international Goren-Goldstein Prize for Best Book in Jewish Th ought, 2010–2012, by Ben- Gurion University of the Negev. Rabbi Adam Mintz, PhD completed his rabbinical ordination at Yeshiva University and received his doctorate at New York University. Rabbi Mintz is a founder of Kehilat Rayim Ahu- vim, a Modern Orthodox synagogue in Manhattan, and an adjunct associate professor in Jewish history at City College, New York. Rav Yosef Zvi Rimon established the Halacha Center to disseminate knowledge about Jewish law around the world. He has writ- ten many books on the sources of halakhah. He is the rabbi of Alon Shvut South, a rabbi in Har Etzion Yeshiva, and the founder of JobKatif. Contributors xi Rabbi Benjamin J. Samuels has been rabbi of Congregation Shaa- rei Tefi llah in Newton Centre, Massachusetts, since 1995. He earned his semikha, as well as his BA and MA, from RIETS and Yeshiva University in the mid-1990s. He is currently the president of the Vaad Harabonim of Massachusetts and serves on its Beit Din. Dr. Jonathan D. Sarna is the Joseph H. & Belle R. Braun Professor of American Jewish History and chair of the Hornstein Jewish Professional Leadership Program at Brandeis University, and chief historian of the National Museum of American Jewish History. Rabbi Yehuda Sarna serves as the executive director of the Bronf- man Center for Jewish Student Life and university chaplain at New York University, as well as adjunct assistant professor at the Wagner School for Public Service. Dr. Lawrence H. Schiff man is the Judge Abraham Lieberman Pro- fessor of Hebrew and Judaic Studies at New York University and Director of the Global Institute for Advanced Research in Jewish Studies. He has served as the Chair of the Skirball Department of Hebrew and Judaic Studies at New York Uni- versity and Ethel and Irvin A. Edelman Professor of Hebrew and Judaic Studies. He is a specialist in the Dead Sea Scrolls, Judaism in Late Antiquity, the history of Jewish law, and Tal- mudic literature. Marc D. Stern, Esq. is a graduate of Yeshiva University and Colum- bia University School of Law. Formerly of the American Jewish Congress, Marc is now general counsel for legal advocacy at the American Jewish Committee. Th e First Freedom Center awarded Marc its Religious Liberty Award in 2012. Dr. Chaim I. Waxman is professor emeritus of sociology and Jew- ish Studies at Rutgers University and senior fellow at the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute. He specializes in the sociology of religion and the sociology of ethnicity with special focus on America’s Jews, Jews in Israel, as well as global Jewish identity and identifi cation. 9 Sephardic Approaches to Conversion Richard Hidary Ideally, a convert to Judaism should be motivated by a desire “to enter into the covenant, to take refuge under the wings of the Shekhinah, and to accept upon himself the yoke of Torah.”1 In reality, however, many proselytes “convert for an ulterior motive”2 and without full commitment. This paper will trace some of the major approaches to dealing with such problematic cases expressed by Sephardic poskim from the Rambam until contemporary authorities. In general, we should not regard Sephardic halakhah and Ashkenazic halakhah as two insular spheres since poskim from all countries have always read and cited each other.3 There is also no one Sephardic or Ashkenazic approach to conversion as both traditions contain voices of leniency and stringency. Nevertheless, it is possible to detect a major trend among many of the most prominent Sephardic poskim who identify themselves as being part of a Sephardic tradition of leniency in this regard. The Sephardic experience also includes several unique ap- 293 294 Richard Hidary proaches to conversion that may be instructive for all communities facing similar issues. We will begin with a review of the most relevant Talmudic sources that form the basis for all subsequent deliberation. We will then see how the Talmudic law is codifi ed by Rambam and Rabbi Yosef Karo. From there we will jump to modern times focusing on three poskim who have devoted much thought about how to apply the laws of conversion in a secular world. We will conclude with a historical overview of the unique ban against conversion currently in force in my own community. Mishnah Yevamot 2:8 addresses one who converts for ulterior motives: One who was suspected of having relations with a maid- servant who was then freed, or with a Gentile who then converted, he may not marry her but if he did marry her we do not remove her from him. If a man is suspected4 of having had relations with a Gentile woman and the Gentile subsequently converts, the Mishnah rules that he may not marry her ab initio. However, ex post facto, if he violates the law and marries her, the court does not force him to divorce her. Furthermore, as the Talmud notes, she is free to marry any other Jew. This assumes that her conversion, although perhaps initiated by ulterior motives, is valid. The Gemara at Bavli Yevamot 24b elaborates: Therefore, she is nevertheless a valid convert. However, another source states: Both a man who con- verts for the sake of a woman and a woman who converts for the sake of a man, and similarly one who converts for the sake of sitting at the table of kings, for the sake of being among the slaves of Solomon, they are not valid converts, so says R.
Recommended publications
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION RECOVERING A REPRESSED PAS T On February 12, 2013, Ruth Calderon was invited to the dais of the Israeli Knesset to deliver her firs t speech as a newly-elected member of parliament.1 The speech was unlike any given in the his tory of deliberations in Israel’s legislature in that it consis ted primarily of her reading and interpreting a Talmudic s tory. The Talmudic s tory that Calderon read before the Knesset, firs t in the original Aramaic and then in Hebrew translation, was, as is typical of these s tories, very brief: Rabbi Rahumi s tudied under Rava in Mehoza. He would regularly come home to his wife on the eve of Yom Kippur. One day [on the eve of Yom Kippur] the topic [he was s tudying] drew him in. His wife anticipated him, “He is coming. He is coming.” He did not come. She began to grieve. She shed a tear from her eye. He was sitting on a roof. The roof collapsed under him, and he died. (B. Ketubot 62b)2 The s tory reflects what appears to have been a common practice among rabbinic scholars in Babylonia: to absent themselves from home for long periods of time to s tudy Torah. The author of the s tory expresses his disapproval of this cus tom by portraying empathically the emotional s tress experienced by Rabbi Rahumi’s wife when he was so engaged in Torah s tudy that he forgot to return home for the sacred holiday. The excitement captured in her cry of anticipation, “He is coming.
    [Show full text]
  • A Future for Israeli-Palestinian Peacebuilding
    Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre A future for Israeli-Palestinian peacebuilding Ned Lazarus July 2017 The Israel-Palestine conflict is one of the most heavily researched in the world. Yet a shockingly small fraction of this research focuses on the millions of Israelis and Palestinians who share this land, their relations with one another, and how such relations could be improved so that a breakthrough might be possible. This report is both timely and necessary, and can hopefully provide a blueprint for greater international support of civil society efforts to foster conflict resolution. John Lyndon Executive Director of OneVoice Europe and Research Fellow at Kings College London BICOM, the Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre, is an independent British think tank producing research and analysis to increase understanding of Israel and the Middle East in the UK. Fathom: for a deeper understanding of Israel and the region is BICOM’s online research journal, publishing interviews, articles and reviews from a range of Israeli, Palestinian and international contributors. Front Cover Photo: EcoPeace’s Israeli, Jordanian and Palestinian directors and staff standing together in the Jordan River as part of their campaign to rehabilitate the river which is dwindling due to diversion of its source waters and pollution. Photograph used by permission of EcoPeace. The Author Ned Lazarus is Visiting Professor of International Affairs at the George Washington University’s Elliott School, and an Israel Institute Teaching Fellow. A conflict resolution scholar, practitioner and evaluator, Ned has conducted evaluative studies of Israeli-Palestinian peacebuilding initiatives on behalf of USAID, USIP and the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Objectives of the Institution of Marriage
    Rabbi Dr. Binyamin Lau is the Rosh Beit Midrash of Beit Morasha in Jerusalem and is the author of numerous articles and books. THE TWO OBJECTIVES OF THE INSTITUTION OF MAR R IAGE1 “For She is Your Companion, and the Wife of Your Covenant.” (Malakhi 2:14) Rabbi Dr. Binyamin Lau Introduction: Marriage According to Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik In the beginning of his article on marriage,2 Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik notes that there are two basic theories about the institution of marriage. The first expresses commitment to the welfare of the group outside the matrimonial union, the partners to the marriage placing themselves at the service of society. The second expresses commitment within the matrimonial union, a commit- ment rooted in the experience of the joining of two individuals thirsting for love and fellowship. One practical difference between the two theories relates to the place assigned to procreation. According to the first theory, having children is the central element upon which the entire structure of marriage rests. Remove that obligation from marriage, and the institution loses all its meaning. According to the second theory, the significance of marriage is not diminished by the absence of offspring. The very union of the wedded partners is itself the desired creation. In his typical manner,3 here too Rabbi Soloveitchik tries to uncover both of these motifs in Scripture. The command to “be fruitful and multiply” (Gen.1:28) expresses the essence and goal of the man created in the first chapter of the book of Genesis. Man’s obligation to procreate, which appears in chapter 1, is presented as part of man being God’s partner in the continuous process of creation.
    [Show full text]
  • Yeshivat Har Etzion Yisrael Koschitzky Virtual Beit Midrash (Vbm) *********************************************************
    YESHIVAT HAR ETZION YISRAEL KOSCHITZKY VIRTUAL BEIT MIDRASH (VBM) ********************************************************* SEFER MELAKHIM BET: THE SECOND BOOK OF KINGS By Rav Alex Israel Shiur #23: Chapters 18-19 – Sancheriv’s Siege of Jerusalem Last shiur we discussed Chizkiyahu's rise to power. We noted his devotion to God and we charted his initial accomplishments: his repudiation of his father's idolatry, his nationwide campaign to expunge pagan worship from the kingdom, the purification and reopening of the Temple and his ambitious strategy to reunify the northern and southern kingdoms. We recall that this last aspiration materialized in a grand, national celebration of Pesach at the Temple in Jerusalem. The subsequent story of Chizkiyahu is narrated through three dramatic episodes: 1. 18:13-19:37 The Assyrian attack on Jerusalem 2. 20:1-11 Chizkiyahu's sickness 3. 20:12-19 The diplomatic visit of Berodakh Baladan from Bavel Despite some question as to the correct chronology1 of these three independent literary segments, we shall study each story according to the order that it features in Sefer Melakhim. 1 We shall address some of the chronological issues in our upcoming chapter. For now, let us note a significant disparity between the timeline in Tanakh and the Assyrian timeline, adopted by historians. Shomron falls in Chizkiyahu's sixth year. Historians date this event to 722 BCE. But the siege in Jerusalem is dated to 701 BCE, some twenty-one years later. This is problematic because Melakhim, Yeshayahu and Divrei Ha-yamim all agree that the siege occurred in the fourteenth year of Chizkiyahu's reign.
    [Show full text]
  • REMAKING of JEWISH SOCIALITY in CONTEMPORARY POLAND: HAUNTING LEGACIES, GLOBAL CONNECTIONS. a Thesis Submitted to the University
    REMAKING OF JEWISH SOCIALITY IN CONTEMPORARY POLAND: HAUNTING LEGACIES, GLOBAL CONNECTIONS. A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in the Faculty of Humanities. 2013 JAN LORENZ SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES List of contents Abstract 3 Declaration 4 Copyright statement 4 Acknowledgements 5 PART I Chapter 1 Introduction 7 Chapter 2 Framing the research. Methodology and visual media 38 Chapter 3 Film and ethnography 54 PART II Chapter 4 The haunting 73 Chapter 5 Belonging 111 Chapter 6 Gmina 151 Chapter 7 Interzone 172 Chapter 8 Becoming 203 Chapter 9 Conclusions 222 Bibliography 230 Word count: 87 797 2 Abstract The University of Manchester Jan Lorenz PhD in Social Anthropology with Visual Media “Remaking Jewish sociality in contemporary Poland: haunting legacies, global connections.” 2013 The Holocaust and post-war anti-Semitism-propelled migration changed the face of Poland, a country that for centuries has been the heartland of the Jewish diaspora. Remnants of the Polish Jewry that did not emigrate, regardless of whether they considered themselves Poles, Poles of Jewish descent or Polish Jews, often felt fearful about speaking of their ancestry, let alone acting upon it. Jewish organizations and social life did not disappear, but religious congregations in particular gradually diminished in number and activity. Post-socialist Poland has become an arena of profound transformation of Jewish communal life, fostered by stakeholders with distinct agendas and resources: empowered and politically emancipated Jewish Religious Communities, now-marginalized secular organizations of the communist era, a nascent generation of Polish Jewish activists and volunteers, and transnational Jewish non-governmental organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel As a Jewish State
    ISRAEL AS A JEWISH STATE Daniel J.Elazar Beyond Israel's self-definition as a Jewish state, the question remains as to what extent Israel is a continuation of Jewish political history within the context of the Jewish political tradition. This article addresses that question, first by looking at the realities of Israel as a Jewish state and at the same time one compounded of Jews of varying ideologies and per suasions, plus non-Jews; the tensions between the desire on the part of many Israeli Jews for Israel to be a state like any other and the desire on the part of others for it to manifest its Jewishness in concrete ways that will make it unique. The article explores the ways in which the tradi tional domains of authority into which power is divided in the Jewish po litical tradition are manifested in the structure of Israel's political sys tem, both structurally and politically; relations between the Jewish reli gion, state and society; the Jewish dimension of Israel's political culture and policy-making, and how both are manifested through Israel's emerging constitution and the character of its democracy. Built into the founding of every polity are certain unresolved ten sions that are balanced one against another as part of that founding to make the existence of the polity possible, but which must be resolved anew in every generation. Among the central tensions built into the founding of the State of Israel are those that revolve around Israel as a Jewish state. on Formally, Israel is built themodern European model of central ized, reified statehood.
    [Show full text]
  • Fine Judaica, to Be Held May 2Nd, 2013
    F i n e J u d a i C a . printed booKs, manusCripts & autograph Letters including hoLy Land traveL the ColleCtion oF nathan Lewin, esq. K e s t e n b au m & C om pa n y thursday, m ay 2nd, 2013 K est e n bau m & C o m pa ny . Auctioneers of Rare Books, Manuscripts and Fine Art A Lot 318 Catalogue of F i n e J u d a i C a . PRINTED BOOK S, MANUSCRIPTS, & AUTOGRAPH LETTERS INCLUDING HOLY L AND TR AVEL THE COllECTION OF NATHAN LEWIN, ESQ. ——— To be Offered for Sale by Auction, Thursday, May 2nd, 2013 at 3:00 pm precisely ——— Viewing Beforehand: Sunday, April 28th - 12:00 pm - 6:00 pm Monday, April 29th - 12:00 pm - 6:00 pm Tuesday, April 30th - 10:00 am - 6:00 pm Wednesday, May 1st - 10:00 am - 6:00 pm No Viewing on the Day of Sale This Sale may be referred to as: “Pisgah” Sale Number Fifty-Eight Illustrated Catalogues: $38 (US) * $45 (Overseas) KestenbauM & CoMpAny Auctioneers of Rare Books, Manuscripts and Fine Art . 242 West 30th street, 12th Floor, new york, NY 10001 • tel: 212 366-1197 • Fax: 212 366-1368 e-mail: [email protected] • World Wide Web site: www.Kestenbaum.net K est e n bau m & C o m pa ny . Chairman: Daniel E. Kestenbaum Operations Manager: Jackie S. Insel Client Accounts: S. Rivka Morris Client Relations: Sandra E. Rapoport, Esq. (Consultant) Printed Books & Manuscripts: Rabbi Eliezer Katzman Ceremonial & Graphic Art: Abigail H.
    [Show full text]
  • Kampen Om Israels Sjæl Martin Krasnik
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Tidsskrift.dk (Det Kongelige Bibliotek) Kampen om Israels sjæl Martin Krasnik Er Israel skabt som et refugium for alverdens jøder, der skulle gøre jøder til herrer over egen skæbne, eller er det en jødisk stat, hvor jødiske love og normer flyder sammen med staten? Lige før nytår skete et lille mirakel i jøder med orientalsk baggrund. Jerusalem. Det gør der sikkert hele Men det har bevæget sig stadig tiden i Den Hellige Stad, men netop længere mod højre i civile religiøse denne begivenhed burde have fået spørgsmål for ikke at tale om de bred international opmærksomhed. uforsonlige holdninger til palæsti- Hør bare: I det israelske parlament nenserne. Partiet symboliserer mere Knesset sidder det lille politiske par- end noget andet den stærkt religiø- ti Shas. Normalt er partiets parla- se del af Israels voksende indflydelse mentsmedlemmer enige om alting, i på hele det israelske samfund. hvert fald udadtil. Hierarkiet er Men så skete der noget. Partiet støbt i beton, og man refererer med har to rabbinere blandt sine 11 par- stor disciplin til ledelsen, ikke mindst lamentsmedlemmer. En af dem hed- den ældgamle ‘åndelige leder’ Ova- der Haim Amsalem, en from mand, dia Yosef og hans nærmeste folk. I der er født i Algeriet og kom til Isra- hvert fald udadtil. el som 11-årig i en af de mange im- Shas er det måske mest indflydel- migrationsbølger fra arabiske lande. sesrige parti i Israel, fordi det de sid- Han gik til frontalangreb på sit eget ste mange år har været udslagsgiven- parti.
    [Show full text]
  • צב | עב January Tevet | Sh’Vat Capricorn Saturn | Aquarius Saturn
    צב | עב January Tevet | Sh’vat Capricorn Saturn | Aquarius Saturn Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 | 17th of Tevet* 2 | 18th of Tevet* New Year’s Day Parashat Vayechi Abraham Moshe Hillel Rabbi Tzvi Elimelech of Dinov Rabbi Salman Mutzfi Rabbi Huna bar Mar Zutra & Rabbi Rabbi Yaakov Krantz Mesharshya bar Pakod Rabbi Moshe Kalfon Ha-Cohen of Jerba 3 | 19th of Tevet * 4* | 20th of Tevet 5 | 21st of Tevet * 6 | 22nd of Tevet* 7 | 23rd of Tevet* 8 | 24th of Tevet* 9 | 25th of Tevet* Parashat Shemot Rabbi Menchachem Mendel Yosef Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon Rabbi Leib Mochiach of Polnoi Rabbi Hillel ben Naphtali Zevi Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi Rabbi Yaakov Abuchatzeira Rabbi Yisrael Dov of Vilednik Rabbi Schulem Moshkovitz Rabbi Naphtali Cohen Miriam Mizrachi Rabbi Shmuel Bornsztain Rabbi Eliyahu Eliezer Dessler 10 | 26th of Tevet* 11 | 27th of Tevet* 12 | 28th of Tevet* 13* | 29th of Tevet 14* | 1st of Sh’vat 15* | 2nd of Sh’vat 16 | 3rd of Sh’vat* Rosh Chodesh Sh’vat Parashat Vaera Rabbeinu Avraham bar Dovid mi Rabbi Shimshon Raphael Hirsch HaRav Yitzhak Kaduri Rabbi Meshulam Zusha of Anipoli Posquires Rabbi Yehoshua Yehuda Leib Diskin Rabbi Menahem Mendel ben Rabbi Shlomo Leib Brevda Rabbi Eliyahu Moshe Panigel Abraham Krochmal Rabbi Aryeh Leib Malin 17* | 4th of Sh’vat 18 | 5th of Sh’vat* 19 | 6th of Sh’vat* 20 | 7th of Sh’vat* 21 | 8th of Sh’vat* 22 | 9th of Sh’vat* 23* | 10th of Sh’vat* Parashat Bo Rabbi Yisrael Abuchatzeirah Rabbi Yehudah Aryeh Leib Alter Rabbi Chaim Tzvi Teitelbaum Rabbi Nathan David Rabinowitz
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbi Ben-Zion Meir Chai Uziel Rabbi Jonathan Ziring: [email protected]
    Rabbi Ben-Zion Meir Chai Uziel Rabbi Jonathan Ziring: [email protected] born 23 May 1880, died 4 ,בן ציון מאיר חי עוזיאל :Ben-Zion Meir Hai Uziel (Hebrew September 1953) was the Sephardi chief rabbi of Mandatory Palestine from 1939 to 1948, and of Israel from 1948 until his death in 1953. Biography Ben-Zion Meir Hai Uziel was born in Jerusalem, where his father, Joseph Raphael, was the av bet din of the Sephardi community of Jerusalem, as well as president of the community council.At the age of twenty he became a yeshivah teacher and also founded a yeshivah called Mahazikei Torah for Sephardi young men. 1. Rabbinic Career (Wikipedia) In 1911, Uziel was appointed Hakham Bashi of Jaffa and the district. There he worked closely Abraham Isaac Kook, who was the spiritual leader of the Ashkenazi community. Immediately upon his arrival in Jaffa he began to work vigorously to raise the status of the Oriental congregations there. In spirit and ideas he was close to the Kook, and their affinity helped to bring about more harmonious relations than previously existed between the two communities. During World War I, Uziel was active as a leader and communal worker. His intercession with the Ottoman government on behalf of persecuted Jews finally led to his exile to Damascus but he was permitted to return to Palestine, arriving in Jerusalem before the entry of the British army. In 1921, he was appointed chief rabbi of Salonika, accepting this office with the consent of the Jaffa-Tel Aviv community for a period of three years.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Phenomenological Existentialism in the Rabbinic Law of Beit Hillel
    135 “If I am here, then all is here”: Towards a Phenomenological Existentialism in the Rabbinic Law of Beit Hillel By: HILLEL E. BRODER and MOSHE L. LAX “Subjective reflection turns in towards subjectivity, wanting in this inner absorption to be truth’s reflection, and in such a way that…where objectivity was brought forward and subjectivity disappeared, so here subjectivity itself is what is left and objectivity what vanishes.” —Soren Kierkegaard1 “If I am here, then all is here.” —Hillel 2 Perhaps the most central name in rabbinic antiquity, Hillel (c. 60 B.C.E. to c. 20 C.E.) and his affiliated mishnaic and talmudic school (“Beit Hil- lel”) of nearly four centuries figure predominantly in both aggadic ideals and normative legal decisions within the rabbinic textual tradition. Hillel’s school is principal in Mishnaic debates and enjoys victory as the dominant rabbinic voice in the majority of over 350 legal disputes.3 In traditional 1 Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs ed. Alastair Hannay (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009), 165. 2 bSukka, 53a. 3 Standard readings of Beit Hillel initialize the house’s genealogy and extend it through 356 C.E. with the death of Hillel II; see most recently Binyamin Lau, The Sages, Vol. 1 (Maggid, 2010), 203–239; Alfred J. Kolatch, Masters of the Talmud: Their Lives and Views (JD Books, 2003), 220. Most significant scholarly opposi- tion to such a traditional theory can be found in Louis Ginzberg “Significance of the Halacha,” On Jewish Law and Lore (Atheneum, 1970). Ginzberg argues that Hillel and Shammai were, in fact, the final Pair (zug) or “preeminent figures” of legal liberalism and conservatism, respectively, who “figured as the last in the period that began with the first Pair, Jose ben Joezer and Jose ben Johanan” (90) referenced in mAbot 1:4–12.
    [Show full text]
  • A Compilation: Thou Shalt Love the Convert Jewish State
    1/20/2016 Bulletin: Lenient Halakhic rulings on Conversion Like 6 Tweet Share Announcements Updates Resources Contact Us Editorial Discuss this and other issues with fellow RRFEI members in the network's new Facebook group by January 18, 2015 clicking HERE! Dear Friends, Many in Israel are working toward a return to halakhah as intended by our tradition, and not as a political gambit to secure power in the A compilation: Thou shalt love the convert Jewish State. by Rabbi Chuck Davidson We have heard in past [Click to download] weeks from Rabbi Aaron Leibowitz, who is working for a rational and traditional Since the fall of the Iron Curtain, Israel has standard of kashrut that been privileged to receive more than one does not coerce Israelis into million Olim from the former USSR. This paying exorbitant fees or Aliya has continued for over two decades, discriminating against other blessing the State of Israel in many ways, religions: a kashrut that is including economically, academically, about food and not about technologically, demographically and politics. [link] culturally. These Olim share a great desire to contribute to their new home, including serving in the IDF's We heard from Rabbi combat units in larger percentages than the general population. The Michael Chernick about second generation has been successfully absorbed into the country, those groups working to and are no different from their Sabra peers who were born in Israel. reform the marriage laws in Israel, so that the hundreds On the one hand, the successful absorption of these Olim has been of thousands or perhaps a blessing to the whole country, and on the other hand it has even millions of Israelis presented significant challenges to Israeli society.
    [Show full text]