Diocese of Gloucester
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Records of Bristol Cathedral
BRISTOL RECORD SOCIETY’S PUBLICATIONS General Editors: MADGE DRESSER PETER FLEMING ROGER LEECH VOL. 59 RECORDS OF BRISTOL CATHEDRAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 RECORDS OF BRISTOL CATHEDRAL EDITED BY JOSEPH BETTEY Published by BRISTOL RECORD SOCIETY 2007 1 ISBN 978 0 901538 29 1 2 © Copyright Joseph Bettey 3 4 No part of this volume may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, 5 electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any other information 6 storage or retrieval system. 7 8 The Bristol Record Society acknowledges with thanks the continued support of Bristol 9 City Council, the University of the West of England, the University of Bristol, the Bristol 10 Record Office, the Bristol and West Building Society and the Society of Merchant 11 Venturers. 12 13 BRISTOL RECORD SOCIETY 14 President: The Lord Mayor of Bristol 15 General Editors: Madge Dresser, M.Sc., P.G.Dip RFT, FRHS 16 Peter Fleming, Ph.D. 17 Roger Leech, M.A., Ph.D., FSA, MIFA 18 Secretaries: Madge Dresser and Peter Fleming 19 Treasurer: Mr William Evans 20 21 The Society exists to encourage the preservation, study and publication of documents 22 relating to the history of Bristol, and since its foundation in 1929 has published fifty-nine 23 major volumes of historic documents concerning the city. -
Bishop of Gloucester, Rachel Treweek
General Synod Safeguarding presentation from Bishop of Gloucester, Rachel Treweek, February 2018 I’m aware that when we talk about safeguarding it engages our hearts, our minds and our guts, and depending on our own experiences, our antennae will be set at different angles. So I hope that in our time of questions there will be opportunity for people to clarify what they’ve heard. I have been asked to say something brief about the Diocese of Gloucester and I look forward to contributing more in response to questions. It was not long after I arrived in Gloucester that Peter Ball, a previous Bishop of Gloucester was finally convicted of horrific abuse - You have the Gibb report (GS Misc. 1172). As I have previously said publicly, I am deeply ashamed of that legacy and deeply sorry; just as I am deeply ashamed and sorry about the abuse people have suffered across the Church which has so often been compounded by wholly inadequate response and a lack of compassion and understanding… .. I do believe that in the present I have the privilege of working with a committed and professional team in Gloucester. And that is not intended to sound defensive. The starting place is the big picture of the good news of the Kingdom of God and the truth that every person is a unique individual with a name, made in the image of God. Transformation, flourishing and reconciliation is at the heart of who God is. Yet we live amid prolific broken relationship including abuse of children and adults, neglect, misused power.. -
History and Antiquities of Stratford-Upon-Avon
IL LINO I S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN PRODUCTION NOTE University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Brittle Books Project, 2009. UNIVERSrryOF ILLINOIS-URBANA ' 3 0112 079790793 C) c)J U0 CI 0F 622-5 CV157 111STORY & ANTIQUITIES STR4TF RkDi U]PO~A I1 ONA"r III c iI1Pir . i r M t a r HISTORY AND ANTIQUITIES OF 5TJRATFORDJPONAVON: fO MPRISI N C A DESCRIPTION OF THlE COLLEGIATE CHURCH,7 THE LIFE OF SJL4KSPEAJRJ, AN Copies of several Documents relating to him anti his Pamniy never before printed; WITH A 13IOGt4PII1C4L SKETCH OF OTHER -V MJNENT CILIRACT2PS , Natives of, or who have resided in STRITFORD, To which, is added, a particular Account of THE- JUBILEE, Celebrated at Stratford, in Honour of our immortal Bard, BYT R. B. WIIELER. 0 gratum Musis, 0 nornen. amabile Plwcbo, Qtam sociarn adsciscant, Minicius atque Meles. Ac tibi, cara hospes, si mens divinior, et te Ignea SiKSPEARI muss ciere queat; Siste gradum; crebroquc oculos circum undique liectas, Pierii lae inontes, hec tOb Pindus erit. &ttatfouYon5ivbon: PRTNTED AND~ SOLD BY J. WARD; SOLD ALSO BYVLONGISAN AND CO.PATERNOSTERa ROW, LONDON'S WILKS AND CO. BIRIMINGHAM, AN!) BY MOST OTHER BOOKSELLERS IN TOWN AND COUNTIRY W2,2. Z3 cws;-7 PREFACE., FIE want of a work in some degree sifilar to the. res sent undertaking eatcouraged the publication of the follow4 ilig sheets, the'offspring oft afew leisure hours; and it is hoped that the world will, on an impartial perusal, make aflowanees for the imperfections, by reflecting as well upon the inexperieace of the Jiuvenile author, as that they were originally collected for"his own private information. -
The Rt Revd Rachel Treweek
The Rt Revd Rachel Treweek Our ref: DB/10/20 Bishop of Gloucester The Bishops’ Office 13 October 2020 2 College Green, Gloucester, GL1 2LR [email protected] Tel: 01452 835511 Dear Sisters and Brothers Last week the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, IICSA, published its overarching investigation report into the Anglican Church in England and Wales, highlighting the failures of the Church of England regarding child sexual abuse. It is not comfortable reading, and neither should it be. This report brings together in one place the shocking failures of the Church, not least in often being more concerned with protecting reputation than focusing on the care of victims and survivors of abuse and responding with compassion. In many ways the sickening findings of this report come as no surprise given the content of the 2017 Gibb report investigating the Church’s response to Peter Ball’s abuse, followed in 2019 by the IICSA report on Peter Ball. I spoke out with lament and shame following these publications and now this final IICSA report highlights our failure as a Church to respond swiftly to some of the key recommendations made, which have been repeatedly voiced by victims and survivors of abuse. Listening, admittance of failure and expression of shock and sorrow are important but they are not enough. Action is required. Therefore, while I am glad that the report acknowledges significant changes which have been made over the years, it also shines a bright light on the systemic failures of governance structures and decision-making. This has undoubtedly hindered the much-needed action being taken swiftly at national level, including a process of satisfactory redress for victims and survivors of abuse, and the need for independence to be appropriately present in policies and procedures. -
Brian Knight
STRATEGY, MISSION AND PEOPLE IN A RURAL DIOCESE A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE DIOCESE OF GLOUCESTER 1863-1923 BRIAN KNIGHT A thesis submitted to the University of Gloucestershire in accordance with the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts and Humanities August, 2002 11 Strategy, Mission and People in a Rural Diocese A critical examination of the Diocese of Gloucester 1863-1923 Abstract A study of the relationship between the people of Gloucestershire and the Church of England diocese of Gloucester under two bishops, Charles John Ellicott and Edgar Charles Sumner Gibson who presided over a mainly rural diocese, predominantly of small parishes with populations under 2,000. Drawing largely on reports and statistics from individual parishes, the study recalls an era in which the class structure was a dominant factor. The framework of the diocese, with its small villages, many of them presided over by a squire, helped to perpetuate a quasi-feudal system which made sharp distinctions between leaders and led. It is shown how for most of this period Church leaders deliberately chose to ally themselves with the power and influence of the wealthy and cultured levels of society and ostensibly to further their interests. The consequence was that they failed to understand and alienated a large proportion of the lower orders, who were effectively excluded from any involvement in the Church's affairs. Both bishops over-estimated the influence of the Church on the general population but with the twentieth century came the realisation that the working man and women of all classes had qualities which could be adapted to the Church's service and a wider lay involvement was strongly encouraged. -
Chaplain the Diocese of Gloucester
Diocese of Gloucester The next Bishop of Gloucester’s Chaplain The Diocese of Gloucester Our diocese covers the county of Gloucestershire and parts of neighbouring counties. It runs from the Welsh border in the west to Lechlade in the east, and from beyond Chipping Campden in the north to Chipping Sodbury in the south. It is home to over 600,000 people and is served by some 327 parishes, 390 churches and 117 church schools. Mission and ministry in the Diocese of Gloucester is shaped by our ‘LIFE’ vision as we seek to share the transforming Gospel of Jesus Christ so that people may know life in all its fullness. The Culture and Values for ministry can be found here. The two bishops and the two archdeacons are based at 2 College Green. In addition to the chaplain, the bishops’ personal staff includes the Bishop of Tewkesbury’s chaplain/PA, the Bishop of Gloucester’s personal secretary and an additional part-time secretary. Bishop Rachel also has a driver. Bishop Rachel seeks to know and be known by her clergy and places a high value on engaging with communities across the diocese and building positive networks of relationship. The Bishop seeks to appoint a chaplain who is personally mature and liturgically literate; a meticulous planner who is excellent with both paper and people and has a heart for the Kingdom of God. Roles and Responsibilities • To be a personal support to the Bishop and someone to whom she can • To liaise with other individuals and organisations in relation to the talk in confidence. -
Anglican Church in Australia SRG 94/10 Adelaide Diocese Church Office Special List Photographs Series 10/18
___________________________________________________________________ Anglican Church in Australia SRG 94/10 Adelaide Diocese Church Office Special List Photographs Series 10/18 Album 1 1. W.D. Maclagan, Bishop of Lichfield 1878-1891, Archbishop of York, 1891- 1908, died 1910. 2. [? C.G. Lang] 3. C.G. Lang, Bishop of Stepney 1901, Archbishop of York 1909 4. [? E.S. Talbot] 5. E.S. Talbot, born 19 Feb. 1844, Bishop of Rochester 1895-1905, Bishop of Southwark 1905-1911. 6. Wm Temple, Bishop of Manchester 1917, Archbishop of York 1927, Archbishop of Canterbury 1942. 7. Dr John Wordsworth, born 1843, Bishop of Salisbury 1884, died 1911 8. Christopher Wordsworth, Bishop of Lincoln 1869-1885, died 1885. 9. Samuel Wilberforce, Bishop of Oxford 1846, Bishop of Winchester 1869, died 1873. 10. B. F. Westcott, Bishop of Durham 1890-1901, died 1901 11. F.E. [unidentified Indian cleric] Ridgeway, Bishop of Kensington 1901, [unidentified Indian cleric] Bishop of Salisbury 1911. 12. [unidentified Indian cleric] 13. [unidentified Indian cleric] 14. [unidentified] 15. [unidentified] 16. W.E. Collins, Bishop of Gibraltar 1904, died 1911. 17. [unidentified bishop in procession] 18. T.C. Fisher, Bishop of Nyasaland 1910 19. A.B. Turner, Bishop of Corea [sic] 1905, died 1910 20. A.R. Tucker, Bishop of Uganda 1890 21. J.A. Kempthorne, Bishop of Lichfield 22. Dr Paget, Bishop of Oxford, 1901-1911 23. B.O.F. Heywood, Bishop of Southwell, Bishop of Ely 24. Unidentified group photo of bishops 25. G. Nickson, Bishop of Jarrow 1906, Bishop of Bristol 26. F.S.G. Warman, Bishop of Truro, Bishop of Manchester 27. -
The Anglican Church
The Anglican Church Investigation Report October 2020 2020 The Anglican Church Safeguarding in the Church of England and the Church in Wales Investigation Report October 2020 A report of the Inquiry Panel Professor Alexis Jay OBE Professor Sir Malcolm Evans KCMG OBE Ivor Frank Drusilla Sharpling CBE © Crown copyright 2020 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the document title specified. Where third‑party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] or Freepost IICSA INDEPENDENT INQUIRY. This publication is available at https://www.iicsa.org.uk/publications CCS0620778888 10/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled‑fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Contents Executive Summary v Pen portraits ix Part A: Introduction 1 A.1: Background to the investigation 2 A.2: The Church of England 2 A.3: The Church in Wales 6 A.4: Methodology 7 A.5: Terminology 10 A.6: References 11 Part B: The Church of England 13 B.1: Safeguarding in the Church of England 14 B.1.1: Introduction 14 B.1.2: Safeguarding structures 15 B.1.3: Safeguarding policies 25 B.1.4: Safeguarding in recruitment -
Adultery in Early Stuart England
Veronika Christine Pohlig ___________________________ Adultery in Early Stuart England ________________________________________ Dissertation am Fachbereich Philosophie und Geisteswissenschaften der Freien Universität Berlin 2009 Erstgutachterin: Frau Prof. Dr. Sabine Schülting Zweitgutachter: Herr Prof. Dr. Dr. Russell West-Pavlov Datum der mündlichen Prüfung: 03.07.2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, I would like to take this opportunity to thank Prof. Ann Hughes, whose enlightening undergraduate seminar at Keele University taught me the fundamentals of historic research, and first sparked my interest in matters of gender and deviance, thus laying the basis for this project. I wish to express my gratitude towards the Graduiertenkolleg Codierung von Gewalt im medialen Wandel for giving me the opportunity to work with a number of amazing individuals and exchange ideas across disciplinary boundaries, and also for providing the financial means to make travelling in order to do research for this project possible. Special thanks goes out to the helpful staff at Gloucestershire Archives. Above all, I am greatly indebted to Prof. Sabine Schülting for providing the warm intellectual home in which this project could thrive, and for blending munificent support with astute criticism. I am most grateful to have benefited from her supervision. I wish to extend my most heartfelt thanks to Maggie Rouse, Sabine Lucia Müller, Anja Schwarz, Judith Luig, and to Kai Wiegandt for their insightful comments on various parts of this dissertation in various stages, but, more importantly, for unerring support and motivation. These were also given most generously by my brother-in-law, Matthias Pohlig, who read the manuscript with a keen historian's eye and provided invaluable feedback at a crucial stage of its genesis. -
Form Part Of, the Said Archdeaconry of Wilts ; and That
2176 form part of, the said archdeaconry of Wilts ; and nothing herein contained shall prevent us from re- that the rural dean of the said deanery, and all pa- forarriending and proposing other measures relating rishes and places, churches and chapels, and the io~ the said bishopricks of Salisbury, Gloucester and whole clergy and others withia the same; shall be Bristol, and Worcester, in conformity with the pro- released from the jurisdiction of the present and visions of the said Act. every future Archdeacon of Salisbury, and be subject All which we humbly recommend and propose to to the jurisdiction of the Archdeacon of Wilts for the your Majesty in Council. tine being. • In witness whereof we have hereunto set our com- And vre further recotnmend nrul propose, with mon seal this thirteenth day of July in the year the consent of the Right Reverend Robert James one eight hundred and thirty-seven. Bishop of Worcester, in testimony whereof he has Aud whereas the said scheme has been approved also" signed and sealed this scheme, and, with the by Her Majesty in Council; now, therefore, Her Ma- like consent of the said James Henry Bishop of jesty, by and with the advice of Her said Council, h Gloucester aud Bristol, testified as aforesaid, that the pleased hereby to ratify the said scheme, and to . whole parish of Shenington, in the county of Glou- order and direct that the same, and every part thereof, cester, but locally situate between the counties of shah1 take effect immediately from and after the tiree Warwick and Oxford, and now forming -
The Collation & Installation of Adrian Partington As a Member of The
THE CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF SAINT PETER AND THE HOLY AND INDIVISIBLE TRINITY GLOUCESTER The Collation & Installation of Adrian Partington as a Member of the College of Canons (Live-streamed service) Tuesday 8 June 2021 5.30pm ORDER OF PROCESSION The Chapter The Apparitor The Bishop of Tewkesbury and the Dean of Gloucester The Canons Elect and Vice Dean The Registrar The choir process into the Quire and the hymn is sung as the Cathedral Procession enters. Hymn (sung by the Choir in the cathedral, please join in at home) Praise the Lord! Ye heavens, adore him; praise him, angels, in the height; sun and moon, rejoice before him, praise him, all ye stars and light. Praise the Lord! for he hath spoken; worlds his mighty voice obeyed: laws, which never shall be broken, for their guidance he hath made. Praise the Lord! for he is glorious; never shall his promise fail: God hath made his saints victorious; sin and death shall not prevail. Praise the God of our salvation; hosts on high, his power proclaim; heaven and earth and all creation, laud and magnify his name! CP 556 Words: Foundling Hospital Collection, c.1796, Psalm 148 Tune: Austria, Joseph Haydn (1732-1809 The Bishop of Tewkesbury welcomes the congregation The Canon Elect stands before the Bishop with the Vice Dean THE COLLATION Bishop Adrian, Canons are called to live a holy life, to pray regularly for God’s blessing upon the mission of the Church in the world, and especially in this Diocese and Cathedral of Gloucester, and to enter gladly into the succession of those in each generation who have served God through the worship offered in this holy place. -
Report on Strand 3A
Church Growth Research Programme Strand 3: Structures Cranmer Hall, St Johns College, Durham Report on Strand 3a Cathedrals, Greater Churches and the Growth of the Church October 2013 Canon John Holmes & Ben Kautzer 1 Contents Introduction Cathedrals are Growing p.5 Cathedrals are Growing Aims Limitations Methodology Overview Reflection Section 1 Background Section 1.1 The Narrative of Cathedral Growth p.8 1.1.1 Introduction 1.1.2 White Elephants? 1.1.3 Pilgrims and Tourists: Growth of Cathedral Visitors 1.1.4 Social change and church attendance 1.1.5 Growing signs 1.1.6 Spiritual Capital 1.1.7 Latest statistics Section 1.2 What are Cathedrals For? Cathedral Ministry and Mission in Context 1.2.1 Introduction 1.2.2 The Bishop’s seat 1.2.3 A Centre of worship 1.2.4 A centre of mission 1.2.5 Worship 1.2.6 Teaching 1.2.7 Service 1.2.8 Evangelism 1.2.9 Witness Section 2 Growing Cathedrals Section 2.1 Where is Cathedral Growth Happening? The Statistics p.16 2.1.1 Introduction 2.1.2 The Statistical Evidence for Cathedral Growth 2.1.3 Analysing the Data 2.1.3.1 Strengths of the data 2.1.3.2 Limitations of the data 2.1.4 Unpacking the Headline Statistics 2.1.4.1 Attendance Statistics by Province 2.1.4.2 Attendance Statistics by Region 2.1.4.3 Attendance Statistics by Cathedral Type 2.1.5 Church Growth and the Shifting Patterns of Cathedral Worship 2.1.5.1 Sunday Services 2.1.5.2 Weekday Services 2.1.6 Conclusion Section 2.2 Who is Attending Cathedral Services? The Worshipper Survey 2.2.1 Introduction 2.2.2 Towards a New Research Strategy 2 2.2.3