<<

Awareness of drug interactions increasing in patients with

Drug Interactions in Stem  Prevalence in HSCT patients Cell Transplantation unknown  4.5-58% in cancer patients  Numerous electronic databases exist with variable reliability Jeannine McCune, PharmD, BCOP  Electronic systems and alerts are University of Washington promising, but have challenges Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research  alert fatigue Center

Lemachatti et al. Anticancer Res. 2009 Nov;29(11):4741-4 ; van Leeuwen Ann Oncol. 2011 Oct;22(10):2334-41. Epub 2011 Feb 22. Scott et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):789-98

When is a drug interaction in HSCT Learning objectives recipients important?

 Explain the common metabolic pathways  Many potential drug interactions in the  Type of interactions  Identify approaches to overcome drug  Pharmaceutical interactions seen in HSCT  Incompatibilities at administration site  Pharmacokinetic  Identify those drug interactions of importance  What the body does to the drug  Understand how to preemptively prevent drug  Pharmacodynamic interactions from occurring  What the drug does to the body  HSCT interaction example: live vaccines  Important if leads to an undesired outcome, whether it be ↓ efficacy or ↑ toxicity

The challenges unique to HSCT Quick review of patients are ….. pharmacokinetic-based  The concentration-effect (i.e., pharmacodynamic) relationships are drug interaction basics rarely defined  Degree of an interaction (and thus its significance) rarely described Drug metabolizing  Cytokines influence regulation Drug transporters  Interpatient variability in the interaction  When an adverse drug interaction occurs, we often lack the pharmacokinetic data to explain it Relationship between and pharmacodynamics Pharmacology is multifactorial

Dose  Can affect both the pharmacokinetics and Absorption pharmacodynamics Distribution  Factors include… Metabolism Excretion  Age Total serum concentration Receptor Site  Sex  Ethnicity Unbound serum concentration Pharmacologic  Weight Response  Condition being treated Protein Bound Concentration  Pharmacogenetics Therapeutic  Idiosyncrasy Outcome  Drug interaction

Slide courtesy of Gail Anderson, PhD

Pharmacokinetic parameters: Pharmacokinetic parameters elimination

 Absorption  Metabolism  The rate at which a drug leaves the site of  Predominately liver administration and the extent to which it occurs  Other sites: kidney, lung, (GI), plasma  HSCT interaction example: proton pump inhibitors with mycophenolate mofetil  HSCT interaction example: many  Distribution  Excretion  Process of reversible transfer of a drug to and  Kidneys and hepatic/GI tract from the site of measurement  Other sites: milk, sweat, saliva, tears  HSCT interaction example: non-steroidal anti-  HSCT interaction example: cyclosporine with inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with (also interacts at kidney)

Biotransformation (Metabolism) Phase I metabolism

 Theory  Oxidation, reduction, hydrolysis  Drug inactivation  Cytochrome P450 family of enzymes  Increased elimination from the body  7 primary enzymes responsible for majority of  Reality  Metabolites may have biological activity;  Can predict drug interactions based on similar or different than parent knowledge of metabolizing enzymes  Various family, subfamily, individual genes  May contribute to toxic and/or beneficial effects  CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP3A4/5  Example: metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) to  Inhibition  CYP,  concentration,  dose 4hydroxycyclophosphamide  Induction  CYP,  concentration,  dose Cytochrome P450 (CYP) system Examples of important CYP in HSCT

 Large (but not only) source of drug interactions Drug Substrate Reaction  Many in vitro methods to identify which Cyclosporine 3A4/5 Elimination CYP metabolizes a drug, and potential drug 3A4/5 “ interactions 3A4/5 “ 3A4/5 “  However, magnitude of drug interaction 3A4/5 “ difficult to predict Cyclophos- 2C9, 2C19 Activation to 4hydroxyCY (HCY)  ‘Cocktail’ studies in healthy volunteers phamide (CY)2 2B6, 3A4/5*  Cytokines (e.g., IL6) affect CYP 3A4/5 Detoxification to dechloroCY

Hebert. Metabolic Drug Interactions 2000; Shimada Transplant International 2003. Ren Cancer Research 1997; Huang Biochem Pharmacol 2000; Qiu Clin Pharm Ther 2004

Phase II metabolism Phase II: Relevant conjugation reactions

 Glutathione S-transferase  Term coined to represent metabolism  Mediate conjugation of electrophilic occurring after oxidation, reduction or compounds to glutathione hydrolysis associated with bioactivation  Important detoxifying pathway for alkylating  Many drugs don’t require Phase I metabolism agents  Functional group created conjugated to less  Glucuronidation toxic or inactive compound  Most common conjugation reaction for drugs  UGT (UDP-glucuronosyl transferase)  Conjugation of endogenous substances, bilirubin, mycophenolic acid, morphine

ABC transporters relevant to HSCT Drug transporters patients

 Of the 400 transporters in the human Transporter Substrate genome, 30 are relevant to ABCB1 (MDR1)* inhibitors, sirolimus pharmacokinetics corticosteroids  ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily ABCC1 (MRP1) methotrexate ABCC2 (MRP2) cyclophosphamide metabolite  Relevant to systemic pharmacokinetics and mycophenolic acid intracellular transport ABCC3 methotrexate ABCG2 (BCRP) etoposide, topotecan *codes for pglycoprotein (pgp)

Endres et al. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2006 Apr;27(5):501-17 Additional transporters Excretion

 Organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)  Drugs are eliminated from the body  methotrexate, opioids, corticosteroid metabolites unchanged or as metabolites  Organic anion transporters (OAT)  Complex, for example renal excretion  beta-lactams, metabolites of corticosteroids, NSAIDs involves  Equilibrative transporter 1 (ENT)  Glomerular filtration  fludarabine  Concentrative -preferring nucleoside  Active tubular transport transporter 1 (CNT)  Passive tubular absorption  fludarabine  HSCT interaction example: NSAIDs inhibit renal tubular secretion of methotrexate and/or reduce renal blood flow by

Zhang et . Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Apr;89(4):481-4; Pauli-Magnus Pharmacogenetics 2003; 13: 189; Sekine Annals of Oncology 2001; 12: 1515; Oleschuk Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2003 inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis Feb;284(2):G280;

Elimination half-life

Pharmacokinetic parameters Example: Plasma Concentrations Drug with T1/2 = 12 hrs  Clearance measures body’s ability to Dose 100 mg 200 mg eliminate drugs  Elimination half-life is time it takes for the C0 20 g/ml 40 g/ml amount of drug in the body to be reduced by C 10 g/ml 20 g/ml 50% 12hr C 5 g/ml 10 g/ml  T1/2 = 0.693•Vd 24hr Cl C36hr 2.5 g/ml 5 g/ml  where Vd = volume of distribution and Cl = total body clearance C48hr 1.2 g/ml 2.5 g/ml  Impact of CYP interactions on clearance C60hr < 1 g/ml 1.2 g/ml  Inhibition  CYP,  clearance,  concentration,  dose  Induction  CYP,  clearance,  concentration,  dose C72hr < 1 g/ml < 1 g/ml

Slide courtesy of Gail Anderson, PhD

Approximate half-lives of relevant Steady state immunosuppressants

 Css = the concentration at which the rate  Calcineurin inhibitors: 11-35 hours (hr) of drug input is equal to the rate of drug elimination  Sirolimus: 62 hr  Can be defined as area under the curve/dosing interval (busulfan)  Mycophenolic acid: 0.6-11.9 hr

 Takes approximately 5 T1/2 to reach steady state  Methylprednisolone, prednisone: 1.7 to 4.1 hr

 Take approximately 5 T1/2 to completely eliminate a drug after discontinuation  Css is dependent on dosage and clearance Learning objectives

 Explain the common metabolic pathways in the liver GVHD Medications  Identify approaches to overcome drug interactions seen in HSCT  Identify those drug interactions of importance Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus,  Understand how to preemptively prevent drug Sirolimus, Methotrexate, interactions from occurring Mycophenolate mofetil, Corticosteroids

Less commonly used GVHD medications The interactions discussed

 Immunomodulating modalities mTOR-  Pharmacokinetic interactions relevant to GVHD inhibitors, , prophylaxis and treatment  Will discuss herbal preparations, but recall they are hydroxychloroquine, vitamin A analogs, unique because of potential pill to pill variability in content, for fungal contamination, immunologic , , properties…..  Cytostatic agents: cyclophosphamide,  Omitting others not because they are less pentostatin important but they may be  more easily identified (e.g., the opioids because of close concentration – effect relationship)  more broad therapeutic index of the medication (e.g., most antibiotics)

Pidala BBMT 2011, 17(10):1528; 2Ferrara Lancet 2009, 373: 9674; Holler Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2007 Jun;20(2):281-94, Wolff BBMT 2011;17(1):1-17

Effect of food/herbs Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)

Effect  Cyclosporine (CyA) and tacrolimus (TAC) Grapefruit juice  intestinal CYP3A,  pgp  Considerable pharmacokinetic variability in CNI St. John’s wort  CYP3A4, pgp concentrations obtained in patients receiving Garlic  CYP3A4 same dose  CNI concentrations related to clinical  Difficult to know magnitude of problem outcomes (pharmacodynamics)  Difficult to predict  CyA/TAC risk of acute GVHD  Expect grapefruit juice to ↑ absorption of etoposide, a CYP3A/pglycoprotein substrate, but it actually ↓  CyA/TAC nephrotoxicity absorption in cancer patients  Pharmacodynamic (e.g., antioxidant) concerns reviewed well in Nutrition chapter of Thomas 4th edition Cancer Research 2004; 64: 4346; Leather BMT 2004; 33:137. Yee; N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 65; Ram et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011 Aug 26 Personalized dosing of CNIs Variability in CYP3A content

 Using pharmacokinetics, CNI doses personalized to achieve target trough concentrations  But….considerable interpatient variability in efficacy and toxicity remain  Better biomarkers (e.g., calcineurin activity1, pharmacogenomics2) still needed  Drug interactions can be identified, and doses adjusted as needed  Important because CNIs are substrates (metabolized by) CYP3A and p-glycoprotein

1Sanquer S et al. Transplantation 2004;77(6):854-8. Pai SY et al, Blood 1994;84(11):3974-9; Koefoed-Nielsen et al. Transplant International 2006;19: 821-7. 2Woodahl EL et al, Pharmacogenomics J. 2008 Aug;8(4):248- 55. Lin et al. Mol Pharmacol 2002;62:162-72

Medications that increase CyA or P-glycoprotein TAC plasma concentrations

 Additional names Effect  Multidrug resistance protein (MRP1) Inhibitors CYP3A P-gp  ATP-dependent drug transporter (ABCB1) Azoles – vary within class   (Fluconazole, Itraconazole,  Drug interaction potential Ketoconazole, )  Limits oral drug Diltiazem, Verapamil   Chloramphenicol ? ?  Transports drugs out of renal tubular epithelial cells and mesangial cells on the glomerulus Norfloxacin  ? Clarithromycin, Erythromycin    Blood brain barrier Grapefruit Juice   Intracellular accumulation Imatinib  ?

Management: Monitor concentrations,  dose of CNI PRN

Hebert. Metabolic Drug Interactions 2000 Ch 37; Leather HL. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004 Jan;33(2):137- 52

Medications that decrease CyA or Importance of transporters: TAC plasma concentrations Cyclosporine causing interactions

Effect  Interaction with statins Inducers CYP3A P-gp  Unexpected interaction of CyA with two statins (rosuvastatin and pravastatin) Enzyme inducing antiepileptics (EIAED)  Numerous mechanisms: CyA inhibits OATP1B1 Carbamazepine  (organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1), Phenobarbital   OATP1B3, and BCRP (breast cancer resistance protein) Phenytoin   Rifampin    Interaction with mycophenolate mofetil St. John’s Wort    CyA inhibits ABCC2, which reduces the enterohepatic recirculation of mycophenolic Management: Monitor concentrations,  dose of CNI PRN acid (MPA), and increases MPA clearance

Hebert. Metabolic Drug Interactions 2000 Ch 37; Leather HL. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004 Jan;33(2):137- 52 Zhang et . Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Apr;89(4):481-4; Endres et al. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2006 Apr;27(5):501-17 Sirolimus Potential sirolimus interactions

 Substrate for CYP3A & Effect on sirolimus concentrations p-glycoprotein INCREASE Decrease  Similar drug Azoles (fluconazole, itraconazole, EIAED (carbamazepine, interactions as CyA and ketoconazole, posaconazole, phenytoin, phenobarbital) TAC voriconazole) Amiodarone St. John’s wort  Long half-life Diltiazem, Verapamil Nevirapine (average: 62 hours) CyA Rifabutin  Will take 5–7 days for Amprenavir Rifampin steady state sirolimus Clarithromycin, Erythromycin concentrations if drug Grapefruit Juice interaction occurs Management: Monitor concentrations, adjust sirolimus dose PRN

Stenton et al. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44(8):769-86; Zimmerman. J Clin Pharmacol 2003; 43: 1168 Micromedex

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) Potential MMF interactions

 Increase MPA levels

esterases  Rosiglitazone (?) MMF Mycophenolic acid*UGTs MPA glucuronide  Decrease MPA levels Renal excretion  Select antibiotics (gut decontamination, norfloxacin & Biliary excretio metronidazole, Augmentin) to intestine (18% of dose)  Some proton pump inhibitors  Rifampin (?)

MPA glucuronide  Calcium polycarbophil Similar amount of  Cholestyramine pharmacokinetic variability as CNIs  Telmisartan  Sevelamer Pharmacodynamic relationships being identified in HSCT patients

Corticosteroids Corticosteroid drug interactions

 In general, steroid  6 -hydroxylation  Increase levels metabolism involves occurs via CYP3A4/5  Ketoconazole sequential but is a relatively hydroxylation followed minor pathway  Oral Contraceptives by conjugation to  P-glycoprotein water-soluble appears to be involved metabolites in the transport of  Decrease levels some steroids  Phenytoin (cortisol,  Phenobarbital dexamethasone,  Carbamazepine methylprednisolone)  Rifampin

Hebert Metabolic Drug Interactions Chapter 37; McCune Clin Pharmacol Ther 2000. Conclusions

 Drug interactions are frequent in HSCT patients  Changes in CYP cause many pharmacokinetic drug interactions, but other types of interactions are also relevant  Considerable interpatient variability in magnitude of a drug interaction  Management of drug interactions much easier when pharmacokinetic monitoring is available  Further data needed to know impact of drug interactions with sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, corticosteroids and post-HSCT cyclophosphamide